Skip to main content

Changing phenotype, early clinical course and clinical predictors of inflammatory bowel disease in Sri Lanka: a retrospective, tertiary care-based, multi-centre study

Abstract

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in the Asia-Pacific region, with changes in disease phenotype and course. We aimed to assess the changing phenotypes of IBD over ten years, describe the early clinical course (ECC) and identify the clinical predictors (CP) of poor outcomes among a large, multi-centre, cohort of Sri Lankan IBD patients.

Methods

We included patients [diagnosed between June/2003–December/2009-Group-1(G1), January/2010–June/2016-Group-2(G2)] with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) from five national-referral centres. Changing phenotype from G1 to G2, ECC (disease duration < 3-years) and CP of poor outcomes (disease duration ≥ 1-year) was assessed. Poor outcomes were complicated-disease (CompD-stricturing/penetrating-CD, extensive-UC/pancolitis, perforation/bleeding/colectomy/malignancy) and treatment-refractory disease (TRD-frequently-relapsing, steroid-dependent/refractory and biologic use).

Results

375 (UC-227, CD-148) patients were recruited. Both G1/G2 had more UC than CD (77% vs 23%, 54.5 vs 45.5 respectively, p < 0.01). Increase of CD from G1-to-G2 was significant (23–45.4%, p < 0.001). In both groups, left-sided colitis (E2) and ileo-colonic (L3)/non-stricturing, non-penetrating disease behaviour (B1) CD predominated. Extensive-colitis (E3) (36.4% vs 22.7, p < 0.05) and stricturing-CD (B2) (26.1% vs 4.0%, p < 0.01) was commoner in G1. ECC was assessed in 173-patients (UC-94, CD-79). Aggressive disease behaviour and TRD were low among both UC and CD. Immunomodulator use was significantly higher among CD than UC (61.5% vs 29.0% respectively, p < 0.01). Anti-TNF use was low among both groups (UC-3.2%, CD-7.7%). Disease complications among UC [bleeding (2.1%), malignancy-(1.1%), surgery-(2.1%)] and CD [stricture-(3.9%), perforation-(1.3%), malignancy-(1.3%), surgery-(8.9%)] were generally low. CPs were assessed in 271-patients (UC-163, CD-108). Having a family history of IBD (for UC), extraintestinal manifestation (EIM), severe disease at presentation, being in younger age categories and severe disease at presentation, (for both UC and CD) predicted poor outcomes.

Conclusion

There was an increase in CD over time without change in disease phenotype for both UC and CD. A relatively benign ECC was observed. Family history (UC), EIMs (UC/CD), severe disease at presentation (UC/CD), younger age (CD/UC) CPs of poor outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD), are chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract imposing a significant disease burden worldwide. Pathogenesis of IBD is multifactorial where genetic predisposition, gut microbiota, and other environmental factors contribute [1]. This resulted in distinct epidemiological trends over time and across geographical regions. IBD was initially considered a disease of wealthy areas including Europe, North America and Australasia [2]. Initially, UC was commoner in most of these countries. Later CD gradually increased in incidence and in some parts of the world it has surpassed UC in rate [3]. IBD is increasingly detected in the emerging economies of the world, such as in China, Singapore, South Korea and India [1]. Although data on the evolution of epidemiological and morphological characteristics of IBD is available from some of these countries, a comparative paucity of evidence is noted from the South-Asian region.

In Europe, the overall annual incidence of IBD per 100,000 population is reported to be 3–7 cases for CD and 4–11 cases for UC [4]. The Asia Pacific Crohn’s and Colitis Epidemiology Study (ACCESS) carried out in Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Thailand showed a rapid rise in the incidence of IBD [5]. The crude annual incidence per 100,000 is estimated to be 0.76 for UC and 0.54 for CD in the ACCESS study [6, 7]. Considering the scarcity of more representative studies, there is a need for understanding the transition of phenotypes and disease characteristics from the early course of the disease epidemiology from low- and middle-income countries.

Sri Lanka does not have a National IBD registry, and there are only a few tertiary referral centres carting to specialist care of IBD patients. Therefore, a study involving all the major referral centres in the country would be best reflective of a nationwide analysis of IBD and its care in Sri Lanka in the absence of a national registry. The objectives of the present study were to assess the changing phenotypes of IBD over ten years, describe the early clinical course (ECC) of IBD and identify the clinical predictors (CP) of poor outcomes among a large, multi-centre, cohort of Sri Lankan IBD patients.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter-study among adult patients (> 16 years of age) with histologically confirmed IBD from five national referral centres in three major cities in Sri Lanka. We recruited patients from Gastroenterology Units of Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Kalubovila, Teaching Hospital, Kandy and Teaching Hospital Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka. These centres collectively provide tertiary level specialist Gastroenterology care for the majority of Sri Lankan IBD patients. The study was conducted from June 2014 to June 2016. From each centre, we recruited all consecutive, consenting patients with IBD during the period of the study.

The patients were diagnosed with UC or CD based on clinical, endoscopic and histological features. We excluded patients with other inflammatory or infective bowel conditions such as infective colitis, indeterminate colitis or intestinal TB.

Data were obtained using an interviewer-administered, structured questionnaire. In addition, clinical data were collected by review of medical records. Phenotypic data (type, location, severity, treatment types, response to treatment and complications) of patients were recorded. Comorbid conditions, details on disease and treatment were confirmed using medical records whenever possible. Montreal classification of IBD was used for the study [8]. Therefore, severe disease at presentation was defined as E3 or S3 for UC and multi-segmental disease, B2 or B3 or presence of P modifier for CD.

We defined complicated disease (CompD) as having stricturing or penetrating disease among patients with CD and extensive or pancolitis in patients with UC. Perforation, significant bleeding, requirement of colectomy or malignant change having taken place were also considered as CompD.

Patients with a disease course that was frequently relapsing (two or more episodes of worsening symptoms after a period of remission), steroid-dependent (who fails to taper steroids below 10 mg within 16 weeks from a starting dose of 0.75–1 mg/kg oral prednisone-equivalent, or who relapses within 12 weeks after steroid discontinuation), steroid-refractory (a patient not responding to 0.75–1 mg/kg of oral prednisone-equivalent within two to four weeks) or requiring biologics were classified as a treatment-refractory disease (TRD) [9].

We grouped patients according to the time of diagnosis as follows: Group-1(G1)-diagnosed between June/2003–December/2009, Group-2(G2)-January/2010–June/2016. We considered patients with a disease duration of less than three years to be in the ECC. We analyzed CP of CompD and TRD among those with one year or more follow up period.

Data were analyzed with STATA version 13. Suitable parametric and non-parametric tests were used, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained by univariate logistic regression analysis.

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka and individual hospital ERCs.

Results

A total of 375 patients (UC-227, CD-148) were included in the study. Six patients with indeterminate colitis (IBD unclassified) were excluded from the analysis. Mean age was 44.9 (SD = 15.9) years, and 50.1% were males. These patients were diagnosed between 2003 and 2016. Characteristics of the patients diagnosed in the period between June-2003–December-2009 (group 1) and January-2010 to June-2016 (group 2) are shown in Table 1. The average age at diagnosis was 38.6 (SD = 0.7) years (UC = 40.3 years CD = 35.4 years, p < 0.01). 100 (26.7%) patients belonged to G1, and 275 (73.3%) patients belonged to G2. Both G1 and G2 had a higher proportion of UC compared to CD (77% vs 23%, p < 0.01 and 54.5 vs 45.5, p < 0.01 respectively).

Table 1 Demographic and disease characteristics of patients diagnosed between June 2003 and December 2009 (Group 1) and January 2010–June 2016 (Group 2)

The increase of proportion of CD from G1 to G2 was significant (23% to 45.4%, p < 0.001). In both groups (G1 and G2), left-sided colitis (E2) (49.4% and 58.0%) for UC and ileo-colonic (L3) (65.2% and 48.3%)/non-stricturing, non-penetrating disease behavior (B1) (69.5% and 84%) for CD predominated. Extensive colitis (E3) for UC (36.4% vs 22.7, p < 0.05) and stricturing-CD (B2) (26.1% vs 4.0%, p < 0.01) was commoner in G1.

A total of 173 patients (UC-94, CD-79) were within three years of initial diagnosis and was used for assessing the ECC. In this group, there were 94 (54.3%) patients with UC and 79 (45.7%) patients with CD. Disease characteristics of this group of patients are described in Table 2. Age (SD) at diagnosis was higher for UC compared to CD (42.7 vs 34.2 years respectively, p < 0.05).

Table 2 Characteristics of the patients in early clinical course (ECC) of UC and CD (within 3 years of diagnosis)

Immunomodulator use was significantly higher among CD compared to UC (61.5% vs 29.0% respectively, p < 0.01) and anti-TNF use were low among both groups (3.2% and 7.7% respectively for UC and CD). Complications among UC [bleeding (2.1%), malignancy-(1.1%), surgery-(2.1%)] and among CD [stricture-(3.9%), perforation-(1.3%), malignancy-(1.3%), surgery-(8.9%)] were generally low during the ECC.

CPs for poor outcomes were assessed in 271 (UC-163, CD 108). Results of binary logistic regression analyses in the patients with UC and CD on associations of CompD, and TRD are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Having a family history of IBD (OR 3.35), extraintestinal manifestation (OR 1.76) and severe disease at presentation (OR 2.22) were associated with poor outcomes in UC. Patients in higher age categories (> 50 years) was less likely to have complicated disease and patients above the age of 30 years were less likely to have TRD in UC. Having extraintestinal manifestations and severe disease at presentation predicted poor outcomes in CD.

Table 3 Predictors of poor outcomes in UC
Table 4 Predictors of complicated disease, disease with complications and treatment refractory disease in CD

Discussion

In the present study, there was an increase in CD over time, but no changes in disease phenotype for either UC or CD. Left-sided UC and ileocolonic CD were the main phenotypes. Only a few patients had CompD or TRD for both UC and CD indicating a relatively benign ECC within three years of diagnosis. Family history of IBD, younger age, presence of EIMs and severe disease at presentation were the CPs of poor outcomes in this cohort.

Our findings showed a near doubling of the proportion of patients with CD (from 23 to 46%) from 2003/2009 to 2010/2016. Similar epidemiological transitions were observed in Western countries during the early phase of the epidemic of IBD [2] and in some Asian countries where IBD is recently rising in prevalence [10, 11]. Although an exact mechanism for the proportional increase in CD compared to UC over time in a given population is not well understood, a multitude of environmental changes, dietary patterns along with genetic and epigenetic factors may contribute [2]. Further, CD was also the diagnosis in 45.7% (79/173) of the patients who were in the ECC. This percentage of CD in G2 and ECC is significantly a higher proportion compared to the previously reported value of 18.6% CD (55/295) from Sri Lanka [12] but is comparable to the figures of 40.1% (1606/4006) reported in a recent study from India [13].

Scientists first noted changes in disease patterns of IBD along with the potential role of environmental and genetic interactions more than fifteen years ago when they observed second-generation South Asian migrants having an equal risk of UC as their western counterparts [14]. Another study in a pediatric population in British Columbia demonstrated a higher prevalence and different phenotypic characteristics including more extensive colonic disease and male predominance in South Asian migrant populations compared to Caucasians [15].

In Caucasian patients, the average age of diagnosis of CD had been between 33 and 45 years while the average age of diagnosis of UC was approximately five years later [16, 17]. Our findings agreed to the same and the mean age at diagnosis was lower for CD compared to UC (34.2 and 42.7 years respectively). We observed a lower mean age at diagnosis for G2 compared to G1 (43.6 and 46.0 years, respectively). This finding is similar to the evidence from the Western world where more and more younger people are detected to have IBD, especially UC [18, 19].

In both G1 and G2, left-sided colitis/proctosigmoiditis (E2) for UC (49.4% and 58.0% respectively) and inflammatory phenotype (B1) (69.5% and 84.0% respectively) and ileocolic location (L3) (65.2% and 48.3% respectively) for CD predominated indicating no change in disease phenotype over time. Comparable disease phenotype predominance for both UC (51% for E2) and CD (67.8% B1 and 40.9% L3) has been reported recently from India [13].

Patients diagnosed after 2009 were less likely to have extensive colitis for UC and less likely to have structuring disease behaviour for CD. Shorter duration of disease, earlier detection and availability of better treatment may have contributed to this pattern.

Patients with CD in their ECC showed less aggressive disease behaviour compared to Caucasian patients. They had a lesser prevalence of stricturing, penetrating and fistulating CD behaviour [16, 20]. Among patient with an early course of UC, the prevalence of pan-colitis was similar to Caucasian populations at approximately one-fifth of all patients [21, 22]. Patients in their ECC had low (< 30%) CompD, low (< 10%) TRD indicating a relatively benign ECC. Previous evidence from Sri Lanka also points towards milder disease in both UC and CD in local patients compared to western populations [10]. In a hospital-based survey in Sri Lanka, 26.2% of patients with UC had extensive large bowel involvement, and 9% had a severe disease at presentation. Out of patients with CD, perianal disease and upper gastrointestinal involvement was seen in 1.6% each and severe disease was observed in 20.0% [10].

Significantly, a higher proportion of patients with CD were on immunomodulatory therapy compared to UC, during the ECC. A very low percentage (< 8% for CD and < 4% for UC) were on biological therapies in the ECC. These findings again favour a relatively benign ECC for both UC and CD in our cohort.

Identifying characteristics associated with poor outcomes can help to direct treatment in patients with IBD. In this population presence of EIMs and severe disease at presentation were associated with a poorer outcome for both UC and CD. This is in agreement of current understanding of UC and CD in Caucasian populations [21, 22]. We found that most of the other established associations of poor outcomes for IBD were not present in our sample of patients. In Caucasian populations, some predictors of poor outcome in UC were extensive disease at the time of presentation, having extraintestinal manifestations, younger age at diagnosis, the severity of mucosal inflammation and inadequate response to initial treatment [21]. Younger age at presentation, presence of disease complications (stricturing disease, penetrating disease, the involvement of the proximal gastrointestinal tract), need of systemic steroids, tobacco smoking and appendectomy have been noted as indicators of poor outcome in patients with CD [23, 24].

Having a positive family history was associated with the development of CompD in UC this study. However, most of the current evidence suggested that although having a family history increases the likelihood of developing UC but does not influence the prognosis or disease course [25]. In the present study, for patients with CD, a family history of IBD was not associated with having poor outcomes. Numerous authors have observed more severe and complicated CD in patients with a family history of IBD. In a large group of patients with CD followed up for a period of over five years, Laurent Beaugerie reported that younger age (< 40 years) at the onset, disease that involves both small and large intestine, perianal disease and requirement of systemic steroids during the first episode was predictive of disabling disease [23].

There are several limitations to the study. The present study only included tertiary referral care centres, which means that there will be selection bias not reflective of the general population. Milder cases of IBD, either misdiagnosed, presenting to and being managed in the primary or secondary care, as well as milder cases on traditional alternative therapies is not reflected in this study. The data presented are retrospective, so the cumulative probability of an outcomes could not be evaluated. Despite these limitations, this is the largest study to report the IBD demographics and phenotype, ECC and CPs from Sri Lanka [12]. Since we have included the five major tertiary care referral centre in the country with specialist services for IBD, the present study may be considered a nation-wide representative sapmle of symptomatic cases of IBD from Sri Lanka.

The age-adjusted incidence of IBD in Sri Lanka, from a study conducted between April 2011 to March 2012, was 1.55 per 100,000 persons (0.94 for UC and 0.56 for CD) [26]. These values were obtained by a prospective, hospital surveillance study in one district of Sri Lanka. The data we present here are on patients admitted to the main tertiary referral hospitals that treat IBD in Sri Lanka over two periods (June 2003 to December 2009 and January 2010 to June 2016). As such, there is a referral bias and these values cannot be compared to the incidence data.

Conclusions

Our results confirm the increasing prevalence of CD compared to UC overtime during the early phase of the IBD epidemic. Characteristics of patients during their early stage of the illness and associations of poor outcomes were inconsistent among South Asians compared to Caucasian populations. Severe initial episode and extraintestinal manifestations were associated with poor outcome in both CD and UC. Having a positive family history was associated with CompD in UC but not in CD. The findings may suggest that there is a difference in disease patterns and disease associations between Western or Caucasian populations and South Asians.

Availability of data and materials

The de-identified datasets used and analyzed during the current study are only available for a valid request to the corresponding author, after notification to and approval of the ERC, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

References

  1. Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2007;448(7152):427–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, Cortot A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(6):1785–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loftus EV Jr. Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(6):1504–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vegh Z, Kurti Z, Lakatos PL. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel diseases from west to east. J Dig Dis. 2017;18(2):92–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(12):720–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng SC. Emerging leadership lecture: Inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: emergence of a “W estern” disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(3):440–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng SC, Tang W, Ching JY, Wong M, Chow CM, Hui AJ, Wong TC, Leung VK, Tsang SW, Yu HH, Li MF. Incidence and phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease based on results from the Asia-pacific Crohn’s and colitis epidemiology study. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(1):158–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel J. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55(6):749–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, Hendy PA, Smith PJ, Limdi JK, Hayee BH, Lomer MC, Parkes GC, Selinger C, Barrett KJ. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2019;68(Suppl 3):s1-06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahuja V, Tandon RK. Inflammatory bowel disease in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparison with developed countries and regional differences. J Dig Dis. 2010;11(3):134–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Da Silva BC, Lyra AC, Rocha R, Santana GO. Epidemiology, demographic characteristics and prognostic predictors of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2014;20(28):9458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niriella MA, De Silva AP, Dayaratne AH, Ariyasinghe MH, Navarathne MM, Peiris RS, Samarasekara DN, Satharasinghe RL, Rajindrajith S, Dassanayake AS, Wickramasinghe AR. Prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in two districts of Sri Lanka: a hospital based survey. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10(1):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Banerjee R, Pal P, Nugent Z, Ganesh G, Adigopula B, Pendyala S, Bernstein CN. IBD in India: similar phenotype but different demographics than the west. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;54(8):725–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang SK, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001;7(3):260–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinsk V, Lemberg DA, Grewal K, Barker CC, Schreiber RA, Jacobson K. Inflammatory bowel disease in the South Asian pediatric population of British Columbia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(5):1077–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loftus EV, Schoenfeld P, Sandborn WJ. The epidemiology and natural history of Crohn’s disease in population-based patient cohorts from North America: a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16(1):51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prideaux L, Kamm MA, De Cruz PP, Chan FK, Ng SC. Inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(8):1266–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henderson P, Hansen R, Cameron FL, Gerasimidis K, Rogers P, Bisset MW, Reynish EL, Drummond HE, Anderson NH, Van Limbergen J, Russell RK. Rising incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Scotland. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(6):999–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pant C, Anderson MP, Deshpande A, Grunow JE, O’Connor JA, Philpott JR, Sferra TJ. Trends in hospitalizations of children with inflammatory bowel disease within the United States from 2000 to 2009. J Investig Med. 2013;61(6):1036–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Henriksen M, Jahnsen J, Lygren I, Aadland E, Schulz T, Vatn MH, Moum B, Ibsen Study Group. Clinical course in Crohn’s disease: results of a five-year population-based follow-up study (the IBSEN study). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42(5):602–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Torres J, Billioud V, Sachar DB, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Colombel JF. Ulcerative colitis as a progressive disease: the forgotten evidence. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(7):1356–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farmer RG, Easley KA, Rankin GB. Clinical patterns, natural history, and progression of ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(6):1137–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaugerie L, Seksik P, Nion-Larmurier I, Gendre JP, Cosnes J. Predictors of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(3):650–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Park Y, Cheon JH, Park YL, Ye BD, Kim YS, Han DS, Kim JS, Hong SN, Kim YH, Jeon SR, Kim WH. Development of a novel predictive model for the clinical course of Crohn’s disease: results from the connect study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(7):1071–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Loly C, Belaiche J, Louis E. Predictors of severe Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(8):948–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasturiratne A, Mufeena MN, Mettananda KC, Fernandopulle N, Rajindrajith S, Waraketiya PR, Weerasinghe SK, Ranaweera A, Hewavisenthi SJ, de Silva AP, de Silva HJ. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Gampaha district: details of the Sri Lankan component of the Asia-Pacific Crohn’s and colitis epidemiology study. Ceylon Med J. 2014;59(1):16–8. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v59i1.6734.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Drs Rajapakshe N, Nanayakkara SD, Luke HPDP, Silva KTM for assisting with the data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from National Research Council, Sri Lanka (Grant number 13-108).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAN, APDeS, RWJ and HJdeS conceptualised the study. NMMM, RKP, UPK and SRK collaborated to provide access to IBD patients at their respective clinics. SKK collected the data. IKL analysed the data. IKL, AVGAMJ and MAN drafted the manuscript. All authors were substantially involved in the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Niriella.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka and individual hospital ERCs. Informed written consent was obtained from all the study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niriella, M.A., Liyanage, I.K., Kodisinghe, S.K. et al. Changing phenotype, early clinical course and clinical predictors of inflammatory bowel disease in Sri Lanka: a retrospective, tertiary care-based, multi-centre study. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01644-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01644-5

Keywords

  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Crohn disease
  • Phenotype
  • Clinical course
  • Clinical predictors
  • Sri Lanka