Skip to main content

Steroid-mediated liver steatosis is CD1d-dependent, while steroid-induced liver necrosis, inflammation, and metabolic changes are CD1d-independent

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Glucocorticoids contribute to the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Natural killer T cells play a role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and response to steroids. The present study aimed to determine the role of CD1d in steroid-mediated metabolic derangement and the steroid-protective effect of glycosphingolipids.

Methods

Ten groups of mice were studied. Steroids were orally administered to C57BL/6 mice to assess the therapeutic effect of β-glucosylceramide (GC) on the development of steroid-mediated liver damage and metabolic derangements. The role of CD1d in the pathogenesis of steroid-induced liver damage and in mediating the hepatoprotective effect of GC was studied in CD1d−/− mice.

Results

A model of oral administration of steroids was established, resulting in insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, liver steatosis, and hepatocellular injury. Steroid administration to CD1d−/− mice was associated with hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia. However, CD1d−/− mice did not manifest marked steroid-induced steatosis. GC treatment alleviated steroid-associated metabolic derangements and liver injury independent of CD1d expression.

Conclusion

A steroid-mediated model of NAFLD and metabolic derangements was established in which steroid-mediated steatosis was CD1d-dependent while steroid-induced liver necrosis, inflammation, and metabolic changes were CD1d-independent, which may support a dichotomy between steatosis and steatohepatitis in NAFLD.

Peer Review reports

Significance statement

The paper describes a steroid-mediated model of NAFLD and metabolic derangements. Steroid-mediated steatosis was CD1d-dependent, while steroidinduced liver necrosis, inflammation, and metabolic changes were CD1d-independent.

Introduction

Glucocorticoid administration inhibits mitochondrial beta-oxidation and lipid beta-peroxidation enzymes, leading to hepatic steatosis. Glucocorticoids inhibit medium- and short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenation and hepatic lipid secretion [1]. In addition, corticosteroids promote de novo fatty acid synthesis by stimulating lipogenic enzymes, including fatty acid synthase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and 11 beta-hydroxysteroids dehydrogenase type 1 in the liver [2]. Glucocorticoids increase hepatic phosphatidate phosphatase (PAP1) activity, promoting fatty acid storage as triacylglycerols (TAGs). TAGs serve for beta-oxidation of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion [3].

Glucocorticoids are catabolic, leading to energy substrates during stress [4, 5]. Steroids play a role in developing diet-induced obesity by modulating fasting triglyceride metabolism [6]. During the fasting state, glucocorticoids mobilize lipids, thus increasing fatty acid delivery, and in the fed state, they promote lipid accumulation [7]. Steroids augment the levels of circulating fatty acids by increasing the caloric and dietary fat intake and the hydrolysis of circulating triglycerides by lipoprotein lipase activity [4]. The process may be associated with ectopic fat distribution in the liver, muscle, and central adipocytes.

Extreme action of cortisol and fatty acids contributes to insulin resistance and associated pathologies [8]. An imbalance of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis exacerbates the effects of cortisol [8]. Fatty acids and cortisol induce insulin resistance, augmenting lipogenesis in the liver and hepatic secretion of glucose and VLDL [9]. In high insulin concentrations, cortisol promotes energy deposition and leads to obesity [8]. Lowered glucose metabolism is associated with altered fatty acid supply, composition, and utilization, as well as with "lipotoxicity," which further contributes to steroid-mediated liver damage [10].

Glucocorticoids may play a role in the pathogenesis of all stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by affecting both the liver and the adipose tissue [7]. Both microvesicular steatosis and ultrastructural mitochondrial lesions have been reported [1]. Chronic glucocorticoids and a high-fat diet (HFD) independently induce insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, and NAFLD. In a rodent model, the combination of glucocorticoids and an HFD resulted in central obesity, insulin resistance, increased liver lipid content, and fibrosis [11]. The liver damage was independent of inflammation [11] and the anti-inflammatory effect of steroids [12].

Intravenous glucocorticoids as a treatment for various steroid-responsive diseases may be associated with liver toxicity. An increase in anabolic–androgenic steroid-mediated hepatotoxicity is a significant public health problem [13]. Both hepatocellular and cholestatic features were described. Statins, for example, when concomitantly employed with methylprednisolone, lead to liver dysfunction [14]. Natural killer T (NKT) cells are a unique subset mostly abundant in murine and human livers. NKT cells are divided into type 1 and type 2 according to their dependence on the interaction with CD1d, a non-polymorphic glycolipid antigen-presenting molecule. NKT cells modulate hepatic inflammation through CD1d recognition in conjunction with glycolipid antigen, and they have a protective role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the response to steroids [15,16,17]. Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) exert a hepatoprotective effect in animal models by alleviating liver inflammation via an NKT cell-mediated effect [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The present study aimed to determine the role of CD1d in steroid-mediated liver injury, metabolic derangement, and the steroid-protective effect of GSLs.

Materials and methods

Animals

10-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories (Jerusalem, Israel). CD1d−/− mice (C57 background) were kindly provided by Dr. Luc Van Kaer, Department of Microbiology and Immunology Medical Center North, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. Mice were maintained in the animal core of the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical School. All mice were administered standard laboratory chow and water ad libitum and maintained a 12-h light/dark cycle. The animal experiments were carried out according to the guidelines of the Hebrew University-Hadassah Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and with the committee's approval.

Induction of liver and metabolic damage and GSL treatment

Metabolic and liver damage were induced by oral administration of Dexamethasone (0.5 mg/day). β-glucosylceramide (GC) was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA), dissolved in a vehicle of a mixture of 30% Cremophor EL (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel) and ethanol (1:1) in PBS, and administered orally at a dose of 15 µg/day.

Study design

Mice in all groups were followed to determine the effect of steroids and GC on metabolic derangements and liver damage. The graphs are representative of three separate experiments in which similar results were obtained.

Experimental groups

Ten groups of mice were studied in three experiments (Table 1). In the first part of the study, three groups of C57BL/6 mice were followed for eight weeks to assess the preventive effect of GC on the development of steroid-mediated liver damage. Group A received vehicle alone, Group B received Dexamethasone, and group C received a combination of Dexamethasone and GC. To determine the therapeutic effect of GC on the existing damage, four groups of C57BL/6 mice were studied in the second part of the study.

Table 1 Experimental groups

Mice in group D received vehicle alone; group E received Dexamethasone, group F received a combination of Dexamethasone and GC, mice in group G received Dexamethasone for six weeks followed by two weeks of administration of Dexamethasone in combination with GC. To determine the involvement of CD1d in steroid-induced liver damage and the steroid-protective effect of GC, we used CD1d−/− mice were for the third part of the study: Mice in group H received vehicle alone, group I received Dexamethasone, and group J received a combination of Dexamethasone and GC for eight weeks.

Fasting serum glucose and insulin levels

Fasting serum glucose levels were measured using a standard glucometer. The manufacturer's instructions determined serum insulin levels using a commercially available ELISA kit (Mercodia AB; Uppsala, Sweden).

Glucose tolerance test (GTT)

A glucose tolerance test (GTT) was performed using a standard glucometer by oral glucose administration (1.25 g/kg) with repeated glucose level tests (the tail vein using a standard glucometer.

Liver enzymes and triglyceride levels

Serum aspartyl transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and serum triglycerides were measured using commercially available sticks by a Reflovet Plus analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

Histological examination

A portion of each excised liver from all mice in all groups was formalin-fixed. Tissue samples were embedded in paraffin, and 5-μm sections were cut. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and read by a blinded pathologist.

Hepatic triglycerides content

Accumulation of intrahepatic triglycerides (TGs) was quantified using a modification of the Folch method [29]. Triglycerides were extracted by a GPO-Trinder kit (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel), then quantified by a spectrophotometer, and normalized levels to the homogenate protein content.

Serum cytokine levels

Serum levels of IL10 and IL17 were measured using a commercially available sandwich ELISA kit (Quantikine, R&D Systems, MN, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Anova test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Steroid treatment-induced insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and liver damage

Figure 1 shows the effect of steroids on metabolic parameters and liver damage. Oral administration of Dexamethasone resulted in insulin resistance manifested by increased fasting serum glucose levels (Fig. 1a). It increased GTT as shown by the study curves (Fig. 1b), by the calculated areas under the curve (AUC) (Fig. 1c), and by increased serum insulin levels (Fig. 1d). Steroid treatment also increased serum triglyceride levels (Fig. 1e). The effect of steroids on insulin and lipid metabolism was associated with a significant hepatocellular injury manifested by an increase in ALT and AST serum levels (Fig. 1f).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of steroid treatment on metabolic and liver parameters. Three groups of C57BL/6 mice were followed for eight weeks to assess the preventive effect of GC on the development of steroid-mediated liver damage. Group A received vehicle alone; Group B received Dexamethasone, and group C received a combination of Dexamethasone with GC. Mice were followed for fasting serum glucose levels (a); postprandial glucose levels as manifested by glucose tolerance test absolute values (b) and AUC (c); serum insulin levels (d); serum triglyceride levels (e); and AST and ALT liver enzymes (f) (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).

Oral administration of β-Glucosylceramide prevented the steroid-mediated metabolic and liver damage

Co-administration of GC and steroids prevented the increase in fasting glucose levels (Fig. 1a), postprandial hyperglycemia (Fig. 1b, c), hyperinsulinemia (Fig. 1d), hypertriglyceridemia (Fig. 1e), and the increase in liver enzymes (Fig. 1f), signifying its protective effect against steroid-mediated metabolic and hepatic damage.

Oral administration of β-Glucosylceramide alleviated steroid-mediated metabolic and liver damage

The second part of the study (Fig. 2) aimed to determine the therapeutic effect of orally administering GC following steroid-mediated metabolic and liver damage induction. GC therapy was associated with a reduction of fasting plasma glucose levels on week eight (Fig. 2a), improvement in the GTT (Fig. 2b), and reduction of serum insulin levels (Fig. 2c). These effects were comparable to the protective effect of GC when administered for prevention (group F vs. group G, prevention vs. treatment, respectively). Similarly, GC therapy alleviated steroid-mediated hypertriglyceridemia (Fig. 2d) and liver injury by reducing ALT and AST serum levels (Fig. 2e). Histological analysis showed a reduction in ballooning and cell apoptosis (Fig. 2f). However, GC did not affect total liver triglyceride content in WT mice (Fig. 2g). GC therapy was associated with an increase in IL10 and IL17 serum levels, suggesting an effect on the systemic immune milieu in this system (Fig. 2h).

Fig. 2
figure 2figure 2

The therapeutic effect of GC on existing metabolic and liver damage was studied in four groups of C57BL/6 mice. Mice in group D received the vehicle alone; Group E received Dexamethasone; Group F received a combination of Dexamethasone with GC; mice in group G received Dexamethasone for six weeks followed by two weeks of Dexamethasone with GC. Mice were followed for fasting glucose levels (a); postprandial glucose levels as manifested by glucose tolerance test (b); serum insulin levels (c); serum triglyceride levels (d); AST and ALT liver enzymes (e); liver histology (H&E X10) (f); hepatic triglycerides content (g); and for serum levels of IL10 and IL17 (h) (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05)

CD1d-dependence of liver steatosis and CD1d-independence of the steroid-mediated damage and therapeutic effect of GC

The third part of the study (Fig. 3) aimed to determine the involvement of NKT cells in steroid-mediated damage and the therapeutic effect of GC. Steroid administration in CD1d−/− mice was associated with significant insulin resistance manifested by increased fasting serum glucose levels (Fig. 3a) and increased GTT (Fig. 3b), along with hypertriglyceridemia (Fig. 3c). Administration of steroids to CD1d−/− mice was associated with significant liver damage manifested by increased liver enzymes (Fig. 3d) and necrosis as seen by histological examination (Fig. 3e). However, CD1d−/− mice manifested the absence of an increase in liver TG content following steroid administration (Fig. 3f).

Fig. 3
figure 3figure 3

The CD1d-dependency of the steroid-induced liver damage, and the steroid-protective effect of GC, were studied in three groups of CD1d−/− mice. Mice in group H received the vehicle alone; Group I received Dexamethasone, and Group J received a combination of Dexamethasone with GC for eight weeks. Mice were followed for fasting glucose levels (a); postprandial glucose levels as manifested by glucose tolerance test (b); serum triglyceride levels (c); AST and ALT liver enzymes (d); liver histology (H&E X10) (e); and hepatic triglycerides content (f) (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05)

The protective effect of GC was independent of CD1d. GC treatment alleviated steroid-mediated hyperglycemia (Fig. 3a, b) and hypertriglyceridemia (Fig. 3c). GC treatment prevented steroid-mediated liver damage as manifested by decreased liver enzymes (Fig. 3d). Histologically, GC treatment alleviated steroid-mediated hepatocyte ballooning, cell apoptosis, and steatosis. Interestingly, GC treatment significantly reduced the triglyceride content (Fig. 3e), an effect that was not observed in WT mice.

Data of all experiments are included in the Additional file 1.

Discussion

The present study established a model of oral steroid administration for eight weeks to simulate insulin resistance and the associated liver injury similar to that noted in patients with metabolic syndrome. Steroid-treated mice exhibited insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and hepatocellular injury. These results support previously published data on the effect of steroids on the liver [7, 11]. CD1d−/− mice were used for determining the potential role of CD1d in mediating steroid damage. The steroid-associated hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia were independent of CD1d. However, CD1d−/− mice did not manifest marked steroid-induced steatosis. The relative resistance to steatosis was independent of the steroid-induced liver damage in these mice manifested by the increased liver enzymes and hepatocytes necrosis on histology. The present study supports a role for CD1d in the development of steatosis per se while not preventing steroid-mediated hepatocyte damage or metabolic derangements. These results suggest a partial role in activating CD1d-positive cells in NAFLD development.

Hepatic steatosis is associated with activation of the innate immune system [30]. Leptin-deficient ob/ob mice exhibit metabolic and inflammatory features that mimic human NAFLD [31,32,33,34]. These mice exhibit a decrease in liver NKT cells [35, 36], suggesting that these lymphocytes may regulate the development of NAFLD [30]. In this model, leptin deficiency modulates inflammation independently of hepatic steatosis. An obese/steatosis HFD model, associated with weight gain and hepatic steatosis, is also associated with a reduction in liver NKT cells [30, 37, 38]. These findings can be interpreted as a lack of a full protective effect of NKT deficiency, wherein a decrease of NKT cells is associated with more significant damage, independent of steatosis. These observations may also result from post-activation-mediated cell death, wherein NKT activation leads to greater steatohepatitis and a subsequent decrease in NKT cells [27]. Endogenous IL-12 released by Kupffer cells (KC) in obesity may promote the release of IFN-γ by activated NKT cells, with a subsequent decrease of intrahepatic NKTs [30, 39]. Dietary fatty acids are linked to hepatic NKT cell deficiency [40], showing that dietary saturated fatty acids (SFA) or monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), but not polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), deplete liver NKT lymphocytes [30, 40].

Obesity is characterized by low-grade systemic inflammation, and the adipocyte-macrophage interaction contributes to its development [41, 42]. An interplay between insulin resistance and inflammation contributes to hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis. Anti-inflammatory agents are beneficial in animal models and patients with NASH [25, 43]. The present study results support the lack of a direct relationship between steroid-induced metabolic changes and hepatocyte injury and steatosis, implying a pathogenesis dichotomy between steatosis and liver damage in NAFLD. NAFLD comprises a spectrum from pure steatosis to NASH. The present data suggest that the mechanism that induces liver damage in NASH may be independent of steatosis and can further explain the liver damage in lean NASH patients and the fact that the majority of patients with simple steatosis do not develop NASH [44, 45].

GC acts as liver-protecting agents and may prevent drug-induced liver injury (DILI) of several hepatotoxic drugs [18]. In the present study, administering GC prevented and treated the steroid-mediated liver damage as observed by a reduction of ALT and AST serum levels and a decrease in the levels of ballooning and apoptosis upon histological examination. GC alleviated steroid-induced hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. The protective effect of GC was independent of CD1d. However, while CD1d−/− mice showed less steroid-mediated steatosis, GC treatment exerted a more profound effect on reducing steatosis in these mice compared with WT mice. These data support a dichotomy in GC function for reducing steroid-mediated steatosis, which is prevented by CD1d, which was not seen for the effect of GC on hepatocellular damage.

Manipulations of NKT cells are beneficial in the settings of diabetes, fatty liver disease, and NASH in animal models and humans [16,17,18,19,20, 23, 39, 40, 46,47,48,49,50]. GC treatment exerts a fat-reducing effect in animal models and humans [23, 33]. The present data support CD1d+ lymphocyte plasticity, which underlines the differences noted between the different models. NKT cells were shown to be either beneficial or associated with liver damage under different conditions in an environment- and disease-dependent manner [47, 48]. GC treatment alleviates immunologically incongruous disorders, suggesting it is associated with a "fine-tuning" of immune responses by altering NKT-plasticity [48, 49], and this effect may be CD1d-mediated [50, 51]. The CD1d-independence of the GC-fat reduction effect under steroid therapy in the present study may also suggest an alternative CD1d-independent liver protective effect of GC. A CD1d evading mechanism similar to the one described for infectious agents may also play a role under these conditions [52]. Interleukin-1 is an essential target of steroid therapy [53] and promotes the inflammation in NASH [51]; a possible link via IL1 and GC may explain these findings.

GC therapy has been associated with increased IL10 and IL17 serum levels, suggesting its effect on the systemic immune system. Serum IL-10 levels are significantly lower in patients with NASH [54], while IL-17 exacerbates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in NAFLD [55]. As only two cytokines were measured in the present study, a general alteration of the cytokine milieu in an anti-inflammatory direction may underlie the noted beneficial clinical effect. Future studies will need to dissect the subsets of cells mediating these effects.

The study's limitation is the lack of analysis of phenotypes of wild type and CD1d-knockout mice side by side, by recruiting both wild type and knockout littermates, instead of performing all the analyses separately. Additional tests to determine the effect of therapies on lipid accumulation in the liver will be conducted in future studies.

Conclusion

Our study established a model of NAFLD and metabolic derangements by steroid administration for eight weeks in which the steroid-mediated steatosis was CD1d-dependent while steroid-induced liver necrosis and inflammation, insulin resistance, and hyperlipidemia were CD1d-independent. The results may support a pathogenesis dichotomy between steatosis and steatohepatitis in NAFLD. CD1d−/− mice were relatively resistant to steroid-induced steatosis, suggesting that NKT cells play a role in fat accumulation. The data may support the lack of a direct association between steatosis per se and liver damage. The beneficial effect of GC to alleviate the steroid induced-metabolic changes and liver damage were independent of CD1d, while CD1d prevented the ability of GC to reduce steroid-mediated steatosis. Overall, the data support the potential use of GC as both a liver protector with steroid therapy and as a drug to treat NAFLD. Our data also support the need for combination therapy in patients with NASH wherein both inflammatory and metabolic pathways need to be targeted [56].

Availability of data and materials

All data of is included in the supplementary file.

Change history

  • 11 May 2022

    After publication of the original article, it was noted that the given and family names of Ami Ben Ya’acov were incorrectly structured. This has been corrected.

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

GSLs:

Glycosphingolipids

NKT:

Natural killer T cells

PAP1:

Phosphatidate phosphatase

TAGs:

Triacylglycerols

HFD:

High-fat diet

GC:

β-Glucosylceramide

GTT:

Glucose tolerance test

AST:

Aspartyl transaminase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

TGs:

Triglycerides

NASH:

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

KC:

Kupffer cells

IFN-γ:

Interferon-gamma

SFA:

Saturated fatty acids

MUFA:

Monounsaturated fatty acids

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

DILI:

Drug-induced liver injury

References

  1. Letteron P, Brahimi-Bourouina N, Robin MA, et al. Glucocorticoids inhibit mitochondrial matrix acyl-CoA dehydrogenases and fatty acid beta-oxidation. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:G1141–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia Y, Viswakarma N, Fu T, et al. Conditional ablation of mediator subunit MED1 (MED1/PPARBP) gene in mouse liver attenuates glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone-induced hepatic steatosis. Gene Expr. 2009;14:291–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manmontri B, Sariahmetoglu M, Donkor J, et al. Glucocorticoids and cyclic AMP selectively increase hepatic lipin-1 expression, and insulin acts antagonistically. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:1056–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Peckett AJ, Wright DC, Riddell MC. The effects of glucocorticoids on adipose tissue lipid metabolism. Metabolism. 2011;60:1500–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Macfarlane DP, Forbes S, Walker BR. Glucocorticoids and fatty acid metabolism in humans: fuelling fat redistribution in the metabolic syndrome. J Endocrinol. 2008;197:189–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mantha L, Palacios E, Deshaies Y. Modulation of triglyceride metabolism by glucocorticoids in diet-induced obesity. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:R455–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woods CP, Hazlehurst JM, Tomlinson JW. Glucocorticoids and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;154:94–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brindley DN. Role of glucocorticoids and fatty acids in the impairment of lipid metabolism observed in the metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995;19(Suppl 1):S69-75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kneeman JM, Misdraji J, Corey KE. Secondary causes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2012;5:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qi D, Rodrigues B. Glucocorticoids produce whole body insulin resistance with changes in cardiac metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;292:E654–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Souza AM, Beaudry JL, Szigiato AA, et al. Consumption of a high-fat diet rapidly exacerbates the development of fatty liver disease that occurs with chronically elevated glucocorticoids. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;302:G850–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rebolledo RA, Liu B, Akhtar MZ, et al. Steroid anti-inflammatory effects did not improve organ quality in brain-dead rats. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:207534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robles-Diaz M, Gonzalez-Jimenez A, Medina-Caliz I, et al. Distinct phenotype of hepatotoxicity associated with illicit use of anabolic androgenic steroids. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:116–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Covelli D, Vannucchi G, Campi I, et al. Statins may increase the risk of liver dysfunction in patients treated with steroids for active graves’ orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:1731–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tajiri K, Shimizu Y. Role of NKT cells in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:850836.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodge G, Hodge S. Steroid resistant CD8(+)CD28(null) NKT-like pro-inflammatory cytotoxic cells in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front Immunol. 2016;7:617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwon HJ, Won YS, Park O, et al. Opposing effects of prednisolone treatment on T/NKT cell- and hepatotoxin-mediated hepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 2014;59:1094–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mizrahi M, Adar T, Lalazar G, et al. Glycosphingolipids prevent APAP and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors-mediated liver damage: a novel method for “safer drug” formulation that prevents drug-induced liver injury. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018;6:127–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zigmond E, Tayer-Shifman O, Lalazar G, et al. beta-glycosphingolipids ameliorated non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the Psammomys obesus model. J Inflamm Res. 2014;7:151–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zigmond E, Zangen SW, Pappo O, et al. Beta-glycosphingolipids improve glucose intolerance and hepatic steatosis of the Cohen diabetic rat. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;296:E72–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zigmond E, Shalev Z, Pappo O, et al. NKT lymphocyte polarization determined by microenvironment signaling: a role for CD8+ lymphocytes and beta-glycosphingolipids. J Autoimmun. 2008;31:188–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lalazar G, Ben Ya’acov A, Eliakim-Raz N, et al. Beta-glycosphingolipids-mediated lipid raft alteration is associated with redistribution of NKT cells and increased intrahepatic CD8+ T lymphocyte trapping. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:1884–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lalazar G, Zigmond E, Weksler-Zangen S, et al. Oral Administration of beta-glucosylceramide for the treatment of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Food. 2017;20:458–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Margalit M, Abu Gazala S, Alper R, et al. Glucocerebroside treatment ameliorates ConA hepatitis by inhibition of NKT lymphocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289:G917–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ilan Y. Review article: novel methods for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis—targeting the gut immune system to decrease the systemic inflammatory response without immune suppression. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44:1168–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilan Y. Compounds of the sphingomyelin-ceramide-glycosphingolipid pathways as secondary messenger molecules: new targets for novel therapies for fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310:G1102–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ilan Y. Beta-glycosphingolipids as mediators of both inflammation and immune tolerance: a manifestation of randomness in biological systems. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Adar T, Shankar Lankalapalli R, Bittman R, et al. The assembly of glycosphingolipid determines their immunomodulatory effect: a novel method for structure-based design of immunotherapy. Cell Immunol. 2020;355:104157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Federico A, D’Aiuto E, Borriello F, et al. Fat: a matter of disturbance for the immune system. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4762–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pelleymounter MA, Cullen MJ, Baker MB, et al. Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science. 1995;269:540–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ilan Y, Maron R, Tukpah AM, et al. Induction of regulatory T cells decreases adipose inflammation and alleviates insulin resistance in ob/ob mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:9765–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Margalit M, Shalev Z, Pappo O, et al. Glucocerebroside ameliorates the metabolic syndrome in OB/OB mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319:105–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Elinav E, Pappo O, Sklair-Levy M, et al. Adoptive transfer of regulatory NKT lymphocytes ameliorates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and glucose intolerance in ob/ob mice and is associated with intrahepatic CD8 trapping. J Pathol. 2006;209:121–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Guebre-Xabier M, Yang S, Lin HZ, et al. Altered hepatic lymphocyte subpopulations in obesity-related murine fatty livers: potential mechanism for sensitization to liver damage. Hepatology. 2000;31:633–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Godfrey DI, MacDonald HR, Kronenberg M, et al. NKT cells: what’s in a name? Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Z, Soloski MJ, Diehl AM. Dietary factors alter hepatic innate immune system in mice with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;42:880–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Black BL, Croom J, Eisen EJ, et al. Differential effects of fat and sucrose on body composition in A/J and C57BL/6 mice. Metabolism. 1998;47:1354–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schmieg J, Yang G, Franck RW, et al. Glycolipid presentation to natural killer T cells differs in an organ-dependent fashion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1127–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hua J, Ma X, Webb T, et al. Dietary fatty acids modulate antigen presentation to hepatic NKT cells in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Lipid Res. 2010;51:1696–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Russo L, Lumeng CN. Properties and functions of adipose tissue macrophages in obesity. Immunology. 2018;155:407–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao Y, Lin L, Li J, et al. CD4(+) T cells in obesity and obesity-associated diseases. Cell Immunol. 2018;332:1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang JT, Mao YM. Pharmacotherapy of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: reflections on the existing evidence. J Dig Dis. 2017;18:607–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Das K, Chowdhury A. Lean NASH: distinctiveness and clinical implication. Hepatol Int. 2013;7(Suppl 2):806–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Araujo AR, Rosso N, Bedogni G, et al. Global epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: what we need in the future. Liver Int. 2018;38(Suppl 1):47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li Z, Lin H, Yang S, et al. Murine leptin deficiency alters Kupffer cell production of cytokines that regulate the innate immune system. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1304–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ilan Y. Immune rebalancing by oral immunotherapy: a novel method for getting the immune system back on track. J Leukoc Biol. 2018.

  48. Zigmond E, Preston S, Pappo O, et al. Beta-glucosylceramide: a novel method for enhancement of natural killer T lymphoycte plasticity in murine models of immune-mediated disorders. Gut. 2007;56:82–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ilan Y, Ohana M, Pappo O, et al. Alleviation of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in a murine model is associated with glucocerebroside-enhanced natural killer T lymphocyte plasticity. Transplantation. 2007;83:458–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhu S, Zhang H, Bai L. NKT cells in liver diseases. Front Med. 2018;12:249–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nishioka Y, Masuda S, Tomaru U, et al. CD1d-restricted type II NKT cells reactive with endogenous hydrophobic peptides. Front Immunol. 2018;9:548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Brutkiewicz RR, Yunes-Medina L, Liu J. Immune evasion of the CD1d/NKT cell axis. Curr Opin Immunol. 2018;52:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Gill PS, Regmi A, Porter-Gill PA, et al. Interleukin-1 regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), glucocorticoid receptor, c-fos and c-jun messenger RNA in the NPLC-KC cell line. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998;137:31–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rabelo F, Oliveira CP, Faintuch J, et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in steatosis and steatohepatitis. Obes Surg. 2010;20:906–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tang Y, Bian Z, Zhao L, et al. Interleukin-17 exacerbates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;166:281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ilan Y. Analogy between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hypertension: a stepwise patient-tailored approach for NASH treatment. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31:296–304.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TA, ABY, YS, MM, LZ, YL: Conducted the study analyzed the data. TA, ABY, YI: wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaron Ilan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal experiments were carried out according to the guidelines of The Hebrew University-Hadassah Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and with the committee's approval. All experimental protocols were approved by The Hebrew University-Hadassah Institutional Committee for Care. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines for the reporting of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Data of all experiments.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adar, T., Ben Ya’acov, A., Shabat, Y. et al. Steroid-mediated liver steatosis is CD1d-dependent, while steroid-induced liver necrosis, inflammation, and metabolic changes are CD1d-independent. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02242-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02242-9

Keywords