Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Paraoxonase-1 is related to inflammation, fibrosis and PPAR delta in experimental liver disease



Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) is an antioxidant enzyme synthesized by the liver. It protects against liver impairment and attenuates the production of the pro-inflammatory monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). We investigated the relationships between hepatic PON1 and MCP-1 expression in rats with liver disease and explored the possible molecular mechanisms involved.


CCl4 was administered for up to 12 weeks to induce liver damage. Serum and hepatic levels of PON1 and MCP-1, their gene and protein expression, nuclear transcription factors, and histological and biochemical markers of liver impairment were measured.


High levels of PON1 and MCP-1 expression were observed at 12th week in the hepatocytes surrounding the fibrous septa and inflammatory areas. CCl4-administered rats had an increased hepatic PON1 concentration that was related to decreased gene transcription and inhibited protein degradation. Decreased PON1 gene transcription was associated with PPARδ expression. These changes were accompanied by increased hepatic MCP-1 concentration and gene expression. There were significant direct relationships between hepatic PON1 and MCP-1 concentrations (P = 0.005) and between PON1 and the amount of activated stellate cells (P = 0.001).


Our results from this experimental model suggest a hepato-protective role for PON1 against inflammation, fibrosis and liver disease mediated by MCP-1.

Peer Review reports


Chronic liver diseases are characterised by the concomitant presence of oxidative stress and a severe inflammatory response [1]. The ubiquitous presence of antioxidant enzymes may represent an important defence mechanism in diminishing the burden of the pro-oxidant stimuli. Paraoxonase-1 (PON1), an enzyme with lactonase and esterase activities, is synthesized, in humans, mainly by the liver [2, 3]. It hydrolyses lipid peroxides, and circulates in plasma bound to high-density lipoproteins (HDL) [4]. We have reported previously that serum PON1 activity is decreased in patients with liver diseases, while serum PON1 concentration and hepatic PON1 protein expression are increased [57]. We also proposed that PON1 may play a role in the regulation of hepatic parenchymal cell apoptosis [6]. More recent evidence indicates that PON1 over-expression provides strong protection against the development of experimental liver disease [8]. Conversely, low PON1 levels are associated with an enhanced sensitivity to the development of liver damage [9].

The cells responsible for the inflammatory response may vary but, usually, resident or recruited monocytes/macrophages play a key role [10]. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) regulates the recruitment of monocytes into tissues and their subsequent differentiation to macrophages. Its expression is increased in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, including liver impairment [1114]. In liver cirrhosis, MCP-1 expression is up-regulated in portal tracts, epithelial cells of regenerating bile ducts, activated stellate cells and Kupffer cells [10]. This suggests that the protein may be involved in sustaining hepatic injury and fibrosis and, as such, to down-regulate the action of MCP-1 may represent a potentially effective therapeutic option.

Despite evident clinical interest, the relationships between PON1 expression and MCP-1 production in chronic liver diseases have not been studied to-date. The present study was designed to investigate the chronological sequence and quantitative relationships between PON1 expression and activity, free radical production, MCP-1 expression, and fibrosis. The model used was experimental rats with chronic liver impairment induced by CCl4 administration and, in which, free radical production and inflammatory cell recruitment to the liver have been extensively documented [1518]. Also, we examined the possible rebound of genetic and pathological changes following the cessation of the hepato-toxic injury, and we explored the molecular mechanisms that may be implicated in the observed changes.


Experimental design

The handling of animals and the procedures described were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Rovira i Virgili University. Liver fibrosis was induced in male Wistar rats (n = 30) weighing 207 ± 9 g (Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) by twice a week intra-peritoneal (i.p.) injections of 0.5 mL of CCl4 diluted 1:1 (v/v) in olive oil [19]. CCl4 administration was continued for up to 12 weeks in a group of 18 rats; 3 subgroups of 6 animals each being sacrificed at 6, 8 and 12 weeks of CCl4 administration. Another group of 12 rats received CCl4 for 6 weeks, the toxicity-inducing agent was stopped, and 2 subgroups of 6 animals each were killed at weeks 7 and 8 (1 and 2 weeks of recovery). An additional group of 6 rats receiving only olive oil was used as a control group. All the animals were fed ad libitum with standard rat chow (Harlan Interfauna, Barcelona, Spain). Before sacrifice, the livers were removed under anaesthesia. Portions were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin for histology examination. The remaining portion of the liver was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for subsequent biochemical and RNA expression analyses.

Biochemical measurements

Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture and serum and EDTA-plasma samples were stored at -80°C until required for analysis. Liver tissue (30 mg) was homogenised in 500 μl of 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH = 7.4) with 100 mM NaCl, and 1% Nonidet-40, in a Precellys 24 homogeniser (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). Homogenisation was 1 cycle of 23 s at 6500 rpm. The esterase activity of PON1 was measured as the rate of hydrolysis of paraoxon at 410 nm and 37°C [5]. The lactonase activity was measured as the hydrolysis of 5-thiobutyl butyrolactone (TBBL) [20, 21]. PON1 concentration was determined by an in-house ELISA method using a polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide derived from the sequence of mature PON1 [22]. MCP-1 concentration was analysed with a murine JE/MCP-1 ELISA development kit from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity, and cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were measured with reagents purchased from Beckman-Coulter (Fullerton, CA, USA).

Quantitative real-time PCR

A 30 mg portion of liver was lysed with 650 μL of 1× Nucleic Acid Purification Lysis Solution® (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). RNA extraction was performed in an ABI Prism™ 6100 nucleic acid prep-station (Applied Biosystems). Reverse transcription to cDNA of 1 μg of total RNA was with random hexamer primers from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Real-time PCR analysis was performed with TaqMan® Low Density Arrays (Applied Biosystems) [23] using primers and probes (TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays) for rat PON1, MCP-1, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), PPARδ, and PPARγ genes. Thermal cycling and fluorescence detection was performed in an Applied Biosystems ABI Prism 7900 HT Sequence Detection System. Amplification involved 40 cycles with the following parameters: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 94.5°C and, for each cycle, 30 s at 97°C for denaturation and 1 min at 59.7°C for transcription. Analysis of gene expression values were performed using the 2-ΔΔCT method. β-glucoronidase (Gusb) gene expression was used for normalisation. This gene has been shown not to undergo any significant change during prolonged administration of CCl4 [24].

Measurement of AP-1 and Sp-1 binding activation

DNA-binding activity of Sp-1 and that of several members of the AP-1 family of nuclear transcription factors (c-Fos, FosB, c-Jun, JunB, JunD, Fra-1, and Fra-2) were analysed in liver homogenates using DNA-binding ELISA methods (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Histological and immunochemical methods

Livers were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h at room temperature, washed twice with water, stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C, and embedded in paraffin. PON1 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the previously described polyclonal anti-PON1 antibody [22]. MCP-1 and PPARδ protein expressions were assessed with polyclonal antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Hepatic 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-protein adducts were measured as an index of lipid peroxidation using a monoclonal antibody from the Japan Institute for the Control of Aging (Shizuoka, Japan). Macrophage staining was performed with a monoclonal antibody against the F4/80 antigen (Serotec, Oxford, UK). The amount of activated stellate cells in the liver was estimated by α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) immunohistochemistry [25] using an anti-SMA antibody from Novocastra (Menarini, Florence, Italy). Biotinylated secondary antibodies used in all the immunochemical methods were obtained from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin. Collagen content of biopsies was estimated by image analysis of the Masson's trichrome stain using an image software system (AnalySIS™, Soft Imaging System, Munster, Germany).

Evaluation of hepatic proteolytic activity

To evaluate the hepatic proteolytic ability, we measured the cathepsin B activity in liver homogenates obtained as described above. Cathepsin B is a lysosomal cysteine protease and its levels are a reliable index of the overall hepatic proteolysis [26]. We used the Innozyme™ Cathepsin B Activity Assay Kit (Calbiochem, Gibbstown, NJ, USA). We investigated the appearance in the homogenates of the inactive procathpsin B by Western Blot using a rabbit polyclonal primary antibody against rat cathepsin B (Abcam, London, UK) which also recognises the proenzyme. Secondary antibodies used were goat polyclonal anti-rabbit immunoglobulins/HRP (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). We also investigated the presence of anti-PON1 immunoreactive fragments in liver homogenates by Western Blot using the polyclonal anti-PON1 antibody described before [22].

Statistical analyses

The effects of CCl4 administration and cessation (recovery) on the biochemical variables over multiple time periods were analysed by ANOVA. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences between any 2 individual time periods. The Spearman regression test was used to evaluate the degree of association between any 2 variables. Results are shown as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 14.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL. USA).


Changes in variables associated with liver injury

The development of chronic liver impairment was associated with significant increases in serum AST activity, the percentage of collagen, and the amount of activated stellate cells in liver tissue. Cessation of CCl4 administration was associated with a partial recovery of normal liver histology and function, as evidenced by a decrease in serum AST activity and the percentage of collagen and activated stellate cells staining in the liver tissue (Table 1). Serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations decreased significantly with CCl4 administration and, in the case of cholesterol, became normalised by the end of the study. Cessation of CCl4 administration was associated with a partial recovery of both parameters.

Table 1 Effect of CCl4 on the liver injury

Hepatic PON1 expression is associated with MCP-1 and fibrosis

The hepatic immunoreactivities of PON1 and MCP-1 were significantly increased in CCl4-administered rats after 12 weeks of CCl4 exposure (Fig. 1). Of note is that the distribution was similar for both proteins. Hepatocytes were strongly stained when located in close proximity to inflammatory infiltrates (indicated by macrophage F4/80 antigen staining) and fibrosis septa. The expression of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal protein adducts (an index of the degree of hepatic oxidative stress) was highest in these areas. The amounts of positively-stained hepatocytes for PON1 and MCP-1 were lower in the less-affected areas of the liver.

Figure 1
figure 1

Representative micrographs of protein expression (A and B) PON1; (C and D) MCP-1; (E and F) F4/80 and (G and H) 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-protein adducts in liver tissue of control rats (A, C, E, G) and rats treated with CCl 4 for up to 12 weeks (B, D, F, H). Original magnification: ×100. The inserts represent the mean percentages of positively-stained areas with respect to the total, in control and treated animals. * P < 0.001.

To extend these observations, we measured the hepatic and serum concentrations of PON1 and MCP-1 and their respective gene expressions. Hepatic PON1 concentration was significantly increased in CCl4-administered rats but, surprisingly, PON1 gene expression showed a significant decrease throughout the CCl4 exposure period. Serum PON1 concentration showed a significant decrease after 6 weeks of CCl4 exposure, followed by a subsequent increase to reach levels similar to those of control animals (Fig. 2A). Hepatic MCP-1 concentration and gene expression showed significant increases that were accompanied by moderate increases in plasma MCP-1 concentrations.

Figure 2
figure 2

Changes in MCP-1 and PON1 protein and gene expression with CCl 4 administration (A) and with CCl 4 withdrawal/recovery of liver function (B).

When we evaluated the recovery of liver histology and function following the cessation of CCl4 administration, we found that the hepatic and serum PON1 concentrations proceeded towards normal levels, and PON1 gene expression remained relatively unmodified (Fig. 2B). The recovery period was associated with a significant decrease in hepatic MCP-1 protein, MCP-1 gene expression, and plasma MCP-1 concentration.

Taking all the experimental data together (treatment + recovery), we observed significant direct relationships between hepatic PON1 concentrations, MCP-1 (r = 0.47; P = 0.005) and α-SMA staining (r = 0.55; P = 0.001).

Changes in hepatic PON1 expression are associated with nuclear transcription factors and decreased proteolysis

To assess the molecular mechanisms of the apparently contradictory changes in the hepatic PON1 gene and its protein product expressions, we sought associations between nuclear transcription factors and the changes in PON1 gene expression. Hence, we analysed the levels of activated Sp-1 and those of several members of the AP-1 family, as well as the gene expressions of PPARα, PPARδ and PPARγ . We observed a strong decrease of PPARδ gene expression during the CCl4 exposure (Fig. 3A and 3B). Fra-2 changes followed a similar trend, albeit not so pronounced. We did not observe any significant change in Sp-1 or any of the other AP-1 proteins studied, nor in PPARα and PPARγ gene expressions (data not shown).

Figure 3
figure 3

Changes in PPARδ gene expression and Fra-2 activation over the period of CCl 4 administration (A) and CCl 4 withdrawal/recovery (B). Panel (C) shows the relationship between PPARδ and PON1 gene expressions in all the animals studied (treatment and recovery). Panels (D) shows representative micrographs of PPARδ protein expression in liver tissue of control rats (left) or animals treated with CCl4 for 12 weeks (right). Original magnification: ×100.

Taking all the experimental data together (treatment + recovery), we observed a significant direct relationship between PPARδ and PON1 (Fig. 3C) gene expression (r = 0.55; P < 0.001) but not between activated Fra-2 levels and PON1 (r = 0.27; P = 0.121) or between Fra-2 and PPARδ (r = 0.26; P = 0.127). PPARδ immunohistochemistry confirmed gene expression analysis, since it was clearly positive in control rats and faint in animals treated with CCl4for 12 weeks (Fig. 3D). These results suggest that PPARδ reduction may be involved in the molecular alterations underlying the inhibition of PON1 gene expression.

We then investigated the possibility that a decrease in PON1 protein degradation explains the increase in the intra-hepatic levels of this protein, despite the decreased gene expression. We estimated the liver proteolytic activity by measuring the protease cathepsin B, a reliable marker of hepatic cell proteolysis [26]. The hepatic cathepsin B activity was significantly increased after 6 weeks of CCl4 administration, followed by a decrease at weeks 8 and 12. This change was accompanied by the appearance, on Western Blot analysis, of bands corresponding to inactive procathepsin B (Fig. 4). We confirmed these results by performing Western Blot analyses of liver homogenates by using a specific anti-PON1 antibody. We observed that the presence of small immunoreactive fragments (MW lower than 35 kDa) was decreased after 12 weeks of CCl4 administration (Fig. 5).

Figure 4
figure 4

Changes in (A) cathepsin B activity; (B) cathepsin B protein expression analysed by Western Blot over the period of CCl 4 administration, and the subsequent withdrawal/recovery period.

Figure 5
figure 5

Hepatic PON1 protein expression over the period of CCl 4 administration. Mature PON1 appears as a double band at ~40 kDa. Low-molecular weight immunoreactive fragments are clearly observed in control rats and in animals receiving CCl4 for 6 and 8 weeks, but their expression is decreased at week 12. In addition, the expression of a high-molecular weight (~55 kDa) unknown immunoreactive protein is enhanced in CCl4-administered animals at 6 and 8 weeks.

Changes in PON1 lactonase and esterase activities

Serum and liver PON1 lactonase activities were consistently decreased throughout the exposure to CCl4, relative to control animals. We did not observe any significant change in PON1 esterase activity. The recovery of liver function was associated with a significant increase in serum PON1 lactonase activity, but PON1 esterase activity did not show any major alteration (Fig. 6). Hepatic PON1 lactonase activity was inversely related to hepatic MCP-1 concentration (r = -0.55; P = 0.001), and to the percentage of collagen in the liver biopsies (r = -0.37; P = 0.028), and to α-SMA staining (r = -0.61; P < 0.001). Serum PON1 lactonase activity was directly related to hepatic lactonase activity (r = 0.40; P = 0.017), and inversely to AST (r = -0.53; P = 0.001), to the percentage of collagen (r = -0.46; P = 0.005), and to α-SMA staining (r = -0.69; P < 0.001). We did not find any significant relationship between PON1 esterase activity and any of these parameters.

Figure 6
figure 6

Changes in the PON1 serum and liver lactonase and esterase activities during CCl 4 administration (A) and recovery (B).


The molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of CCl4 involve the production of the highly pro-oxidant trichloromethyl free radical (CCl3 *) and trichloromethylperoxy radical (CCl3OO*) which play key roles in the development of hepatic damage [27]. Reactive oxygen intermediates and aldehyde end-products of lipid peroxidation (such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal) act as mediators affecting signal transduction pathways as well as proliferation and functional responses of hepatic cells [28, 29]. MCP-1 expression by the liver is up-regulated by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal [30]. Our results show a significant increase in MCP-1 gene and protein expression in our experimental model, and which support previous studies in patients with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis [31, 32] in which MCP-1 expression correlated with monocyte infiltration in the liver. In these previous studies, the infiltration was observed in the portal tracts, the regenerating bile ducts, and in the septa surrounding the regenerating nodules, and was similar to the distribution of MCP-1 immunostaining observed in the present investigation. We also found that the histological and functional recovery following the CCl4 withdrawal was associated with a significant decrease in MCP-1 protein and gene expression.

MCP-1 is synthesised by a variety of hepatic cells including macrophages, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and hepatocytes [31]. The influence of MCP-1 on the histological alterations leading to liver impairment would appear to be crucial. This protein enhances hepatic stellate cell chemotaxis and contributes to the increase in collagen synthesis [33]. Further, MCP-1 knockout mice develop a lower degree of oxidative stress and accumulation of inflammatory cell infiltrate than their corresponding wild-type animals when receiving a single CCl4 dose [34]. Aldehyde products of lipid peroxidation and MCP-1 would appear to induce a synergistic effect on the fibrogenetic process leading from acute to chronic liver damage.

Several studies have investigated the role played by intracellular antioxidant defences in the protection against hepatic oxidative stress [35]. However, there is a paucity of information on the contribution of PON1 in this process. Recently, transgenic mice over-expressing human PON1 were shown to be partially protected against CCl4-induced liver injury [8]. PON1 attenuates MCP-1 production in cultured endothelial cells incubated with oxidised low-density lipoproteins [36]. This enzyme catalyses the hydrolysis of oxidised phospholipids and at least two of these phospholipids [1-palmytoyl-2-(5-oxovaleroyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine and 1-palmytoyl-2-glutaroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine] stimulate the production of MCP-1 [37]. In the present study, we observed a significant increase in the hepatic PON1 concentration following 6 and 8 weeks of CCl4 administration. During this period, MCP-1 hepatic concentration and gene expression were low. MCP-1 only increased around the 12th week when PON1 concentration showed a trend towards a decrease. These data suggest that PON1 acts as a barrier against hepatic oxidative stress and, only when this barrier is overcome by protracted exposure to CCl4, does MCP-1 increase together with a concomitant development of a severe pro-inflammatory reaction. The histological examination of the liver biopsies in our present study suggests, as well, that the enhanced PON1 protein expression is related to the protection of hepatocytes from increased oxidative stress; PON1 staining being stronger in those cells surrounding the areas of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal deposition and of macrophage infiltration. The recovery of liver function was associated with a significant decrease in hepatic PON1 protein expression.

The mechanisms underlying the regulation of PON1 and MCP-1 in this experimental model are complex. Of note was that despite observing an increased PON1 protein expression, PON1 gene expression was not enhanced but, rather, was decreased following CCl4 administration. These results may seem paradoxical, but we need to bear in mind that the intracellular accumulation of any protein is a result of a balance between synthesis, degradation, and secretion into the medium. Our results suggest that changes in PPARδ may be, at least in part, responsible for this alteration. PPARδ is the lesser known of the PPAR group of nuclear transcription factors. PPARδ increases apolipoprotein A-I and HDL synthesis by mechanisms that probably involve activation of the ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA1) gene [38]. We hypothesise that the decrease in PPARδ gene expression observed in the present study would be associated with a decreased HDL synthesis, which accords with the decreased serum cholesterol concentrations. This decrease would have, as a consequence, a decreased PON1 secretion to the extracellular medium. This would explain the decreased serum PON1 concentrations at weeks 6 and 8 of CCl4 administration (paralleling those of cholesterol) and the increased hepatic PON1 concentration. Moreover, PPARδ has been shown to up-regulate the expression of several antioxidant genes including superoxide dismutase, catalase and thioredoxin [39]. As such, a direct effect of PPARδ on the regulation of PON1 gene expression is a likely possibility.

A precise explanation for PPARδ gene expression decrease in experimental liver disease is difficult. This transcription factor inhibits apoptosis in cultured cardiomyoblasts [40] and we have previously described hepatocyte apoptosis as being stimulated in experimental liver disease [41]. Probably, PPARδ levels decrease as a part of a pro-apoptotic mechanism tending to eliminate damaged hepatocytes during the process of liver damage. Within this context, hepatic PON1 levels continue to be elevated as a consequence of the combination of a decreased PON1 secretion into the HDL particles, essentially very early in the study, and to an inhibition of lysosomal protein degradation by the last weeks of the study. This enables the enzyme to continue playing its antioxidant and hepato-protective role. A scheme of the proposed mechanisms underlying the alterations in PON1expression in experimental liver disease is shown in Fig. 7.

Figure 7
figure 7

A hypothetical biochemical pathway that could explain the PON1 alterations observed in the CCl 4 -administered rats. Free radical-induced liver impairment would result in a decrease in PPARδ gene expression and, as a consequence, in PON1 gene expression. It would also induce an inhibition of ABCA1, a decrease in HDL synthesis and, therefore, a decrease in serum PON1 concentration. Serum lactonase activity would be decreased secondarily to these changes and, as well, due to a direct inhibition by free radicals. Intrahepatic PON1 levels would be increased as a consequence of a decreased protein degradation.

A similar rationale to that of PPARδ may apply to Fra-2. This protein also stimulates ABCA1 gene expression [42], decreases cell apoptosis and stimulates proliferation [43]. However, our results show that Fra-2 decrease is lower than that of PPARδ, and does not correlate with PON1 gene expression. Probably, the contribution of this transcription factor to hepatic PON1 levels is, if any, modest or even indirect.

Hepatic and serum lactonase activity decreased during CCl4 administration and increased during the recovery period (CCl4 withdrawal). The finding of a reduced lactonase activity together with an enhanced hepatic PON1 protein expression is consistent with our previous studies in which we observed similar results in patients with chronic liver diseases [6]. The decreased lactonase activity is perhaps secondary to enzyme depletion following its reaction with products of lipid peroxidation. For example, there is evidence that PON1 is inactivated following the hydrolysis of lipid peroxides [44, 45]. The changes in serum PON1 lactonase activity observed in our study were, in general, inversely correlated with the alterations in the concentrations of serum PON1 and MCP-1, and the degree of liver impairment. Conversely, the esterase activity, with paraoxon as the substrate, did not show any significant relationships with these parameters. Serum esterase activity is much lower in rats than in humans [5] and, in the light of the present results, we propose that it does not represent functional PON1 activity, but rather a more non-specific activity due, at least in part, to the action of other serum esterases, or to the esterase capability of serum albumin [46]. These results suggest that interpreting serum PON1 esterase activity would need to be conducted with caution in experimental studies in rodents.


We suggest a hepato-protective role for PON1 against inflammation, fibrosis and liver disease mediated by MCP-1, and propose a hypothetical model to explain the hepatic PON1 alterations observed. Further studies with animals treated with artificial PON1-containing lipid constructs or with PPARδ agonists would be valuable in investigating measures to counteract the inflammatory and fibrogenetic processes in chronic liver impairment and, possibly, to provide new effective tools to treat this disease.



ATP-binding cassette transporter-1


aspartate aminotransferase


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


monocyte chemoattractant protein-1


polymerase chain reaction




peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor


smooth muscle actin


5-thiobutyl butyrolactone.


  1. Parola M, Robino G: Oxidative stress-related molecules and liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2001, 35: 297-306. 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00142-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leviev I, Negro F, James RW: Two alleles of the human paraoxonase gene produce different amounts of mRNA. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17: 2935-2939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodrigo L, Gil F, Hernández AF, Marina A, Vázquez J, Pla A: Purification and characterization of paraoxon hydrolase from rat liver. Biochem J. 1997, 321: 595-601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. La Du BN: Human serum paraoxonase/arylesterase. Pharmacogenomics of drug metabolism. Edited by: Kalow W. 1992, Pergamon Press, 51-91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferré N, Camps J, Prats E, Vilella E, Paul A, Figuera L, Joven J: Serum paraoxonase activity: a new additional test for the improved evaluation of chronic liver damage. Clin Chem. 2002, 48: 261-268.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferré N, Marsillach J, Camps J, Mackness B, Mackness M, Riu F, Coll B, Tous M, Joven J: Paraoxonase-1 is associated with oxidative stress, fibrosis and FAS expression in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2006, 45: 51-59. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsillach J, Ferré N, Vila MC, Lligoña A, Mackness B, Mackness M, Deulofeu R, Solá R, Parés A, Pedro-Botet J, Joven J, Caballeria J, Camps J: Serum paraoxonase-1 in chronic alcoholics: Relationship with liver disease. Clin Biochem. 2007, 40: 645-650. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.01.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang C, Peng W, Jiang X, Chen B, Zhu J, Zang Y, Zhang J, Zhu T, Qin J: Transgene expression of human PON1 Q in mice protects the liver against CCl4 induced injury. J Gene Med. 2008, 10: 94-100. 10.1002/jgm.1128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ustundag B, Bahcecioglu IH, Sahin K, Duzgun S, Koca S, Gulcu F, Ozercan IH: Protective effect of soy isoflavones and activity levels of plasma paraoxonase and arylesterase in the experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis model. Dig Dis Sci. 2007, 52: 2006-2014. 10.1007/s10620-006-9251-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson KJ, Henderson NC, Bone-Larson CL, Lukacs NW, Hogaboam CM, Kunkel SL: Chemokines in the pathogenesis of liver disease: so many players with poorly defined roles. Clin Sci (Lond). 2003, 104: 47-63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daly C, Rollins BJ: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL2) in inflammatory disease and adaptive immunity: therapeutic opportunities and controversies. Microcirculation. 2003, 10: 247-257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Czaja MJ, Geerts A, Xu J, Schmiedeberg P, Ju Y: Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) expression in toxic rat liver injury and human liver disease. J Leukoc Biol. 1994, 55: 120-126.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marsillach J, Bertran N, Camps J, Ferré N, Riu F, Tous M, Coll B, Alonso-Villaverde C, Joven J: The role of circulating monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 as a marker of hepatic inflammation in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Biochem. 2005, 38: 1138-1140. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coll B, Alonso-Villaverde C, Joven J: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and atherosclerosis: Is there room for an additional biomarker?. Clin Chim Acta. 2007, 383: 21-29. 10.1016/j.cca.2007.04.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iredale JP: Models of liver fibrosis: exploring the dynamic nature of inflammation and repair in a solid organ. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 539-548. 10.1172/JCI30542.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arthur MJ, Mann DA, Iredale JP: Tissue inhibitors or metalloproteinases, hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998, 13: S33-S38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiménez W, Clària J, Arroyo V, Rodés J: Carbon tetrachloride induced cirrhosis in rats: a useful tool for investigating the pathogenesis of ascites in chronic liver disease. J Gastroentrol Hepatol. 1992, 7: 90-97. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1992.tb00940.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferré N, Camps J, Cabré M, Paul A, Joven J: Hepatic paraoxonase activity alterations and free radical production in rats with experimental cirrhosis. Metab Clin Exp. 2001, 50: 997-1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gassó M, Rubio M, Varela G, Cabré M, Caballería J, Alonso E, Deulofeu R, Camps J, Giménez A, Pajares M, Parés A, Mato JM, Rodés J: Effects of S-adenosylmethionine on lipid peroxidation and liver fibrogenesis in carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1996, 25: 200-205. 10.1016/S0168-8278(96)80074-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khersonsky O, Tawfik DS: Chromogenic and fluorogenic assays for the lactonase activity of serum paraoxonases. Chembiochem. 2006, 7: 49-53. 10.1002/cbic.200500334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaidukov L, Tawfik DS: The development of human sera tests for HDL-bound serum paraoxonase PON1 and its lipo-lactonase activity. J Lipid Res. 2007, 48: 1637-1646. 10.1194/jlr.D600045-JLR200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marsillach J, Mackness B, Mackness M, Riu F, Beltrán R, Joven J, Camps J: Immunochemical analysis of paraoxonases-1, 2, and 3 expression in normal mouse tissues. Free Rad Biol Med. 2008, 45: 146-157. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.03.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goulter AB, Harmer DW, Clark KL: Evaluation of low density array technology for quantitative parallel measurement of multiple genes in human tissue. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 34-10.1186/1471-2164-7-34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chung H, Hong DP, Yung JY, Kim HJ, Jang KS, Sheen YY, Ahn JI, Lee YS, Kong G: Comprehensive analysis of differential gene expression profiles on carbon tetrachloride-induced rat liver injury and regeneration. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005, 206: 27-42. 10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bataller R, Gäbele E, Schoonhoven R, Morris T, Lehnert M, Yang L, Brenner DA, Rippe RA: Prolonged infusion of angiotensin II into normal rats induces stellate cell activation and proinflammatory events in liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003, 285 (3): G642-G651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kharbanda KK, McVicker DL, Zetterman RK, Donohue TM: Ethanol consumption reduces the proteolytic capacity and protease activities of hepatic lysosomes. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1995, 1245: 421-429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hensley K, Robinson KA, Gabbita P, Salsman S, Floyd RA: Reactive oxygen species, cell signalling and cell injury. Free Rad Biol Med. 2000, 28: 1456-1462. 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00252-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parola M, Bellomo G, Robino G, Barrera G, Dianzani MU: 4-Hydroxynonenal as a biological signal: molecular basis and pathophysiological implications. Antioxidant Redox Signaling. 1999, 1: 255-284. 10.1089/ars.1999.1.3-255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zamara E, Novo E, Marra F, Gentilini A, Romanelli RG, Caligiuri A, Robino G, Tamagno E, Aragno M, Danni O, Autelli R, Colombatto S, Dianzani MU, Pinzani M, Parola M: 4-Hydroxynonenal as a selective pro-fibrogenic stimulus for activated human hepatic stellate cells. J Hepatol. 2004, 40: 60-68. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00480-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Czaja M, Geerts A, Xu J, Schmiedeberg P, Ju Y: Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) expression occurs in toxic rat liver injury and human liver disease. J Leukoc Biol. 1994, 55: 120-126.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marra F, DeFranco R, Grappone C, Milani S, Pastacaldi S, Pinzani M, Romanelli RG, Laffi G, Gentilini P: Increased expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 during active hepatic fibrogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1998, 152: 423-430.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tabata T, Mine S, Kawahara C, Okada Y, Tanaka Y: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 induces scavenger receptor expression and monocyte differentiation into foam cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 305: 380-385. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00771-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marra F, Romanelli RG, Giannini C, Failli P, Pastacaldi S, Arrighi MC, Pinzani M, Laffi G, Montalto P, Gentilini P: Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 as a chemoattractant for human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 1999, 29: 140-148. 10.1002/hep.510290107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zamara E, Galastri S, Aleffi S, Petrai I, Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Novo E, Bertolani C, Milani S, Vizzutti F, Vercelli A, Pinzani M, Laffi G, LaVilla G, Parola M, Marra F: Prevention of severe toxic liver injury and oxidative stress in MCP-1 deficient mice. J Hepatol. 2007, 46: 230-238. 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parola M, Robino G: Oxidative stress-related molecules and liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2001, 35: 297-306. 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00142-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mackness B, Hine D, Liu Y, Mastorikou M, Mackness M: Paraoxonase-1 inhibits oxidised LDL-induced MCP-1 production by endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 318: 680-683. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Navab M, Berliner JA, Subbanagounder G, Hama S, Lusis AJ, Castellani LW, Reddy S, Shih D, Shi W, Watson AD, van Lenten BJ, Vora D, Fogelman AM: HDL and the inflammatory response induced by LDL-derived oxidised phospholipids. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21: 481-488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fürnsinn C, Willson TM, Brunmair B: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ, a regulator of oxidative capacity, fuel switching and cholesterol transport. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 8-17. 10.1007/s00125-006-0492-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fan Y, Wang Y, Tang Z, Zhang H, Qin X, Zhu Y, Guan Y, Wang X, Staels B, Chien S, Wang N: Suppression of pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules by PPAR-δ in human vascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008, 28: 315-321. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.149815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pesant M, Sueur S, Dutartre P, Tallandier M, Grimaldi PA, Rochette L, Connatt JL: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ) activation protects H9c2 cardiomyoblasts from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2006, 69: 440-449. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.10.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cabré M, Ferré N, Folch J, Paternain JL, Hernández M, Del Castillo D, Joven J, Camps J: Inhibition of hepatic cell nuclear DNA fragmentation by zinc in carbon tetrachloride-treated rats. J Hepatol. 1999, 31: 228-234. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80218-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang XP, Freeman LA, Knapper CL, Amar MJ, Remaley A, Brewer HB, Santamarina-Fojo S: The E-box motif in the proximal ABCA1 promoter mediates transcriptional repression of the ABCA1 gene. J Lipid Res. 2002, 43 (2): 297-306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Karin M, Liu Z, Zandi E: AP-1 function and regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997, 9: 240-246. 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80068-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Aviram M, Billecke S, Sorenson R, Bisgaier C, Newton R, Rosenblat M, Erogul J, Hsu C, Dunlop C, La Du B: Paraoxonase active site required for protection against LDL oxidation involves its free sulfhydryl group and is different from that required for its arylesterase/paraoxonase activities: selective action of human paraoxonase allozymes Q and R. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998, 18: 1617-1624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Billecke S, Erogul J, Sorenson R, Bisgaier CL, Newton RS, La Du B: Human serum paraoxonase (PON1) is inactivated by oxidized low density lipoproteins and preserved by antioxidants. Free Rad Biol Med. 1999, 26: 892-904. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00272-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li B, Sedlacek M, Manoharan I, Boopathy R, Duysen EG, Masson P, Lockridge O: Butyrylcholinesterase, paraoxonase, and albumin esterase, but not carboxylesterase, are present in human plasma. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005, 70: 1673-1684. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.08.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references


Supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS 02/0430, 05/1607, RCMN C03/08 and RD06), Ministerio de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain. NF is a post-doctoral research fellow funded by the Juan de la Cierva program of the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid, Spain. JM is the recipient of a post-graduate fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya (FI 05/00068). The authors are grateful to Drs. Dan Tawfik, Leonid Gaudikov and Olga Khersonsky from the Weizmann Institute of Science (Rehovot, Israel) for the generous gift of the TBBL reagent. Editorial assistance was provided by Dr. Peter R. Turner from t-SciMed (Reus, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Camps.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that there have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JM, study design, performed experimental studies, statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript; JC, study design, edited the manuscript; NF, study design, performed experimental studies; RB, immunohistochemistry, nuclear transcription factor analyses; AR, rat breeding, immunohistochemistry; BM & MM, generation of anti-PON1 antibodies, contribution to study design, edited the manuscript; JJ, edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marsillach, J., Camps, J., Ferré, N. et al. Paraoxonase-1 is related to inflammation, fibrosis and PPAR delta in experimental liver disease. BMC Gastroenterol 9, 3 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: