Skip to main content

Age is the only predictor for upper gastrointestinal malignancy in Chinese patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia: a prospective investigation of endoscopic findings

Abstract

Background

Dyspepsia is a common cause of physician visits. If and when endoscopy should be performed depend on the regions and the populations. This study aimed to identify the current risk factors predictive of upper gastrointestinal malignancy or peptic ulcer in China with high prevalence of gastric cancer.

Methods

A questionnaire was conducted among consecutive outpatients undergoing their first esophagogastroduodenoscopy for dyspepsia. Symptoms other than alarm symptoms in this study were defined as uncomplicated dyspepsia.

Results

4310 outpatients (mean age 44, median 42, range 14–86) were included in the final analyses. Significant pathology was found in 13.8% (595/4310) patients including peptic ulcer (12.3%) and upper gastrointestinal malignancy (1.5%). Age, male sex and alarm symptoms were significantly associated with malignancy. The age cut-off identified for upper gastrointestinal malignancy was 56 years among patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia, which was similar to the combined cutoff of age and gender.

Conclusions

Age should be considered as the primary predictor for upper gastrointestinal malignancy in Chinese patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia. 56 could probably be the optimal age to identify those lesions in this population. Trial registration: Chictr.org (ChiCTR2000040775).

Peer Review reports

Background

Dyspepsia is a common complaint in China and although almost three-quarters of patients with dyspepsia do not have endoscopic findings [1, 2], peptic ulcers and gastric cancer are both frequent [3, 4]. The majority of gastric cancers worldwide occur in Asia with China being responsible for the majority of cases [4]. The status of upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease in China currently approximates that of early to mid-twentieth century in the United States or Europe with duodenal ulcer being common in the younger population and gastric ulcer and gastric cancer becoming more common as the population ages [5]. Gastroesophageal reflux is also common although the expression may differ from that commonly seen in the West [6]. For example, an endoscopic survey in Shanghai showed only 28.8% of patients with erosive esophagitis had typical symptoms [7].

In Japan, the population is encouraged to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as part of their regular physical examination starting at age 50 [8]. The role EGD in the evaluation of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia varies depending on the background prevalence of peptic ulcer and gastric cancer in the population as well as factors such as age, sex, presence or absence of symptoms, family history, use of gastrotoxic or antisecretory drugs, etc [9]. The high prevalence of peptic ulcer and gastric cancer in China supports the use of endoscopy for evaluation of dyspepsia, its use for universal screening remains controversial in China and has not been adopted as standard policy. This contrasts with the use of endoscopy in Japan and South Korea, both high gastric cancer risk countries, where it is used to screen for early cancer has achieved good results [10].

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of different upper gastrointestinal pathologies in a large Chinese population presenting to hospital because of upper gastrointestinal symptoms with the goal of identifying risk factors useful to predict major endoscopic findings in this population.

Methods

Study design and participants

This prospective observational study was carried out at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Renji Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. From January to December 2017 consecutive adult outpatients presenting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms who had no prior investigations enrolled with no preference (dyspepsia, heartburn, alarm symptoms, etc.) were offered upper GI endoscopy. The exclusive criteria and questionnaire screening detail was shown in previous study [11]. Major symptom and symptom duration could be seen below for details. The EGD was performed by qualified gastroenterologists or endoscopic physicians, who were blinded to the included subjects. It is also routine practice at our endoscopic center to obtain biopsies for histological examination and rapid urease tests (RUT) for H pylori infection detection. All biopsy specimens were evaluated by experienced pathologists of the Department of Pathology of Renji Hospital. H. pylori infection was determined by one of positive outcome of rapid urease test (RUT) and histology or 13C urea breath test (UBT). Previous H. pylori infection was identified by the eradication history and its negative result of H. pylori in the study.

Definitions

The Rome IV diagnostic criteria [12] for dyspepsia were used and included upper abdominal symptoms including postprandial fullness, early satiety, epigastric pain or epigastric burning. Reflux symptoms were defined as heartburn, regurgitation, or retrosternal pain according to the Montreal Consensus [13]. Alarm symptoms considered in this study included melena, vomiting, anemia, weight loss (more than 10% weight loss in six month), hematemesis or vomiting brown liquid or dysphagia. Other symptoms scored included belching, poor appetite, retrosternal discomfort, abdominal discomfort, nausea, hiccup, bad breath and pharyngeal symptoms. Symptoms other than alarm symptoms in this study were defined as uncomplicated dyspepsia. The principle for ranking of multiple symptoms was alarm symptoms first and followed by the most troublesome symptom. Based on clinical practice, the symptoms in this study were divided into the following 5 groups based on symptoms duration (x): < 1 week, 1 week ≤ x < 1 month, 1 month ≤ x < 3 months, 3 months ≤ x < 6 months, ≥ 6 months. Endoscopic findings were defined in previous study [11].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed with SPSS 18.0 and MedCalc Version 19.2.0 for Windows (Statistical Product and Service Solutions). According to endoscopic findings, patients were divided into 3 groups: malignancy, peptic ulcer and non-major lesions. The influence factors between the different subgroups were analyzed by univariate logistic correlation analysis and multivariate logistic stepwise regression and their odd ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals and p values were calculated. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The diagnostic accuracy of related factors was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC). The curve represents the relationship between sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of major lesions. The cutoff value of age for malignancy was determined by Youden’s index.

Results

Demographic and clinical data of patients

A total of 4624 patients completed the survey questionnaire and 4310 (93.2%) underwent EGD. Patient demographic data are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. There were no statistically significant differences in gender (p = 0.342) or age (p = 0.194) between study population and the population lost to follow-up. RUT was not performed in 19 patients or/and H. pylori histology was not done because a malignant lesion obstruction prevented endoscopic entry or they were taking anticoagulant drugs. In those subjects active H. pylori infection was determined by 13C urea breath test or the positive serum antibody without eradication history.

EGDs were normal in 75.1%. Major lesions were found in 13.8% (595 patients) (Table 1) including 12.3% (529 patients) with peptic ulcers, 350 duodenal ulcers (8.1%), 125 gastric ulcers (2.9%), and 54 gastric and duodenal ulcers (1.3%). There were 66 malignancies (1.5%) including 51 gastric cancers (1.2%, 7 early, 44 advanced) and 15 esophageal cancers (0.3%, 13 squamous, 2 adenocarcinoma).

Table 1 Endoscopic findings (n = 4310)

The prevalence of endoscopic findings in relation to symptoms is shown in Additional file 1: Table S2. Malignancies first appeared in the 30–40 year age group and the prevalence increased rapidly with age (Additional file 1: Table S3). A total of 1475 patients (34.2%) had active H. pylori infections including 72.4% of those with peptic ulcers and 24.2% with malignancy (esophagus cancer 26.7%, gastric cancer 23.5%). Erosive esophagitis was present in 11.3%. Except for peptic ulcer, the prevalence of active H. pylori infection was similar in all groups: dyspeptic symptoms (29.8%), reflux symptoms (25.6%), alarm symptoms (26.8%) and other symptoms (27.3%) (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Factors associated with the major lesions

Age, male sex and alarm symptoms were the risk factors significantly associated with malignancy (Table 2). Age, male sex, smoking history, alarm symptoms, symptom duration of < 1 week and active H. pylori infection were significantly related to peptic ulcer (Table 3).

Table 2 Univariate logistic analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis of related factors of malignancy
Table 3 Univariate logistic analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis of related factors of peptic ulcer

The subgroup of 4037 patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia has 45 malignancies (68.2%, 12 females; 33 males). Four patients (6.1%) were aged less than 50 years. Age cutoffs derived from the ROC curve of Youden’s index were 56 years for males and 57 years for females, with 28 of 33 and 11 of 12 cancers detected over these thresholds, respectively. Table 4 shows the effect of combination of age and gender on the predictive capability of malignancy in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia. Shifting the age cut-off to 56 for males and to 57 for females compared to the recommended age of 50 in Japan showed a numerical increase for the positive likelihood ratio obviously and also improved the sensitivity and specificity relatively. The age cut-off identified for upper gastrointestinal malignancy was 56 years among patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia (Fig. 1), which is similar to combined cut-off of age and gender.

Table 4 Effect of combination of age and Gender on the predictive capability of malignancy in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia (n = 4037)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Age indication for malignancy in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia

Discussion

In this prospective study of 4310 consecutive patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for evaluation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms, 75.1% had a normal EGD; 13.8% had major lesions (peptic ulcer disease 12.3%, gastric cancer 1.2%, and esophageal cancer 0.3%). These results are consistent with another study from China showing that as least a quarter of patients undergoing EGD had significant endoscopic findings [14]. These findings contrast with those of western countries where reflux esophagitis and endoscopic suspected esophageal metaplasia (ESEM) are currently the predominant findings. The high prevalence of H. pylori and its related diseases, peptic ulcer and malignancy, remains high in China [14] such that in China, in contrast to many western countries, screening for peptic ulcer and malignancy has proven to be cost effective [15, 16].

The prevalence of peptic ulcer (12.3%) is slightly below the range of the endoscopic case series reported in China (13.7–22.5%) [17, 18], probably due to the relatively low prevalence of H. pylori infection (34.2% in the total study sample). This prospective study revealed a strong positive association between active H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer. The majority of individuals with peptic ulcer (72.4%) in the study were found to be H. pylori positive. Age, male sex, smoking history, alarm symptoms and symptom duration of < 1 week were also independent predictors for developing peptic ulcer. NSAID use, known to be associated with gastrointestinal injury, including erosions, ulceration and hemorrhage, was not identified as a risk factor for the development of symptomatic peptic ulcer in this study.

The diagnostic value of any symptom or set of common symptoms is generally related to the prevalence of the disease being sought in that population. As such, gastric cancer is expected to be a rare endoscopic finding for evaluation of dyspepsia in the United States [19] and to become increasingly common in proportion to the incidence of gastric cancer in the population [20]. In China H. pylori infection and its related diseases are common as confirmed in this study 12.3% and 1.2% of dyspeptic patients were diagnosed with peptic ulcer and gastric cancer, respectively. Our study also confirmed that most patients presenting with dyspepsia have a normal endoscopy which is reflected in the lack of a significant association between the presence of dyspepsia and finding a peptic ulcer or gastric cancer.

The value of alarm symptoms remains controversial, particularly in low cancer incidence countries where alarm symptoms, with the possible exception of dysphagia and weight loss, have little or no predictive value [21, 22]. Even in areas with a high rate of esophago-gastric cancer only 7.7% of patients with alarm symptoms had an upper gastrointestinal malignancy. For the 31.8% of patients with malignancy in this study the presence of alarm symptoms had an OR of 8.54.

Although upper GI endoscopy is an important means of diagnosing upper GI diseases, its cost effectiveness as a screening modality depends on the costs and expected findings in the candidate population. In western countries, the most common clinical diseases associated with uninvestigated dyspepsia are gastroesophageal reflux disease (40%), non-ulcer dyspepsia (40%) and peptic ulcer (13%) [23]. In those populations gastric cancer is rare and endoscopic screening of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia is generally not recommended until an age of 60 [24]. All people more than 50 years old in Japan were required to undergo endoscopy to rule out organic disease [8]. Based on the results of the present study, in the subgroup of 45 patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia who had malignancy at EGD, the Japan’s recommend age cut-off of 50 years demonstrated a lower positive likelihood ratio for predicting malignancy. Better clinical predictors for upper GI malignancy need to be identified. Given the high prevalence of dyspepsia, the immediately endoscopic investigation in the cut-off age is not a trivial exercise. Thus, even a variation of a few years in the cut-off age would change management strategy in thousands of people especially in China with a large population basis. Our study suggests the age cut-offs identified for upper GI malignancy was 56 years for males and 57 years for females in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia, which is similar to the age cut-off alone (56 years). However, a prospective multicenter study in Italy showed that the age cut-offs identified for malignancy with uncomplicated dyspepsia were 35 years for males and 56 years for females [25].

Compared to the previous study, we had some characteristics. Patients with the first EGD were selected as the target population, so the indications of endoscopy were diverse and comprehensive. Length of symptom and H. pylori infection were also included, which were rarely mentioned in previous studies. Moreover, this study originally find out that the age cut-off for malignancy is 56 year which isn’t basically affected by gender among patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia in China with high background prevalence of H. pylori infection and upper GI malignancy. The limitation of this study was that this was a single-center observational study and 314 patients did not finish EGD.

Conclusions

Age should be considered as the primary predictor for malignancy in Chinese with uncomplicated dyspepsia regardless of the gender. Our data strongly suggest that 56 could probably be the optimal age to identify those lesions in this population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due privacy issues, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

GI:

Gastrointestinal

RUT:

Rapid urease tests

UBT:

Urea breath test

OR:

Odd ratios

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under curve

References

  1. Zagari RM, Law GR, Fuccio L, et al. Dyspeptic symptoms and endoscopic findings in the community: the Loiano-Monghidoro study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:565–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford AC, Marwaha A, Sood R, et al. Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, uninvestigated dyspepsia: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2015;64:1049–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Z, Zou D, Ma X, et al. Epidemiology of peptic ulcer disease: endoscopic results of the systematic investigation of gastrointestinal disease in China. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2570–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, et al. National estimates of cancer prevalence in China, 2011. Cancer Lett. 2016;370:33–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Graham DY. History of Helicobacter pylori, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zou D, He J, Ma X, et al. Epidemiology of symptom-defined gastroesophageal reflux disease and reflux esophagitis: the systematic investigation of gastrointestinal diseases in China (SILC). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Herregods TV, Troelstra M, Weijenborg PW, et al. Patients with refractory reflux symptoms often do not have GERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:1267–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Asaka M. A new approach for elimination of gastric cancer deaths in Japan. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1272–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasechnikov V, Chukov S, Fedorov E, et al. Gastric cancer: prevention, screening and early diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13842–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Li M, Chen S, et al. Endoscopic screening in asian countries is associated with reduced gastric cancer mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:347-354.e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Y, Li H, Long X, et al. Lessons learned from upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese. Helicobacter. 2021;26:e12803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki H. The application of the Rome IV criteria to functional esophagogastroduodenal disorders in Asia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;23:325–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20 (quiz 1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Rabitti S, et al. Prevalence of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in the community: a systematic review of studies in unselected samples of subjects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:1527–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ro TH, Mathew MA, Misra S. Value of screening endoscopy in evaluation of esophageal, gastric and colon cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng X, Mao X, Xu K, et al. Massive endoscopic screening for esophageal and gastric cancers in a high-risk area of China. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0145097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia B, Xia HH, Ma CW, et al. Trends in the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori infection in family physician-referred uninvestigated dyspeptic patients in Hong Kong. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:243–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong SN, Sollano JD, Chan MM, et al. Changing trends in peptic ulcer prevalence in a tertiary care setting in the Philippines: a seven-year study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:628–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Canga C 3rd, Vakil N. Upper GI malignancy, uncomplicated dyspepsia, and the age threshold for early endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:600–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sung JJ, Lao WC, Lai MS, et al. Incidence of gastroesophageal malignancy in patients with dyspepsia in Hong Kong: implications for screening strategies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:454–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kapoor N, Bassi A, Sturgess R, et al. Predictive value of alarm features in a rapid access upper gastrointestinal cancer service. Gut. 2005;54:40–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallace MB, Durkalski VL, Vaughan J, et al. Age and alarm symptoms do not predict endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia: a multicentre database study. Gut. 2001;49:29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. North of England Dyspepsia Guideline Development G. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Dyspepsia: Managing Dyspepsia in Adults in Primary Care. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): University of Newcastle upon Tyne Crown Copyright © 2004. 2004.

  24. Moayyedi P, Lacy BE, Andrews CN, et al. ACG and CAG clinical guideline: management of dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:988–1013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, et al. Combination of age and sex improves the ability to predict upper gastrointestinal malignancy in patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia: a prospective multicentre database study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:784–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL: study concept and design, acquisition of data, data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. YH and HYL: patient recruitment, acquisition of data, statistical analysis and critical revision of the manuscript. QG: critical revision of the manuscript. XHL and XL: patient recruitment and study coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients prior to study participation.

Consent for publication

No identifiable data is presented.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Supplemental Table 1. Basic characteristics of patients studied (n=4310). Supplemental Table 2. The prevalence of endoscopic findings in various symptoms. Supplemental Table 3. The prevalence of gastric pathology in different ages. Supplemental Figure 1. The prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with various symptoms.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Gui, Q., Li, H. et al. Age is the only predictor for upper gastrointestinal malignancy in Chinese patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia: a prospective investigation of endoscopic findings. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 441 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01951-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01951-x

Keywords

  • Symptom
  • Endoscopy
  • Malignancy
  • Peptic ulcer