Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Chemopreventive effects of berberine on intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+mice

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Gastroenterology201313:163

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-163

©  Cao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 22 April 2013

Accepted: 23 November 2013

Published: 27 November 2013

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid, has shown inhibitory effects on growth of several tumor cell lines in vitro. The aim of this study was to investigate chemopreventive effects of berberine on intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+ mice.

Methods

Four-week old Apc min/+ mice were treated with 0.05% or 0.1% berberine in drinking water for twelve weeks. The number and the size of tumors were measured to evaluate intestinal tumor development. Tissue sections were prepared for PCNA and Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cell proliferation, and TUNEL assay and cleaved caspase-3 immunostaining for apoptosis. Western blot analysis and immunostaining were performed to detect the activation of Wnt and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways and COX-2 expression in the intestinal tumor cells. The prostaglandin E2 level in the small intestine was detected using ELISA.

Results

Compared with untreated Apc min/+ mice, the total numbers of tumors in the small intestine and the colon were reduced by 39.6% and 62.5% in 0.05% and 0.1% berberine-treated mice, respectively. The numbers of tumors in proximal, middle, and distal segments of the small intestine in 0.1% berberine-treated mice were significantly reduced by 53.7%, 55.3%, and 76.5% respectively. Berberine treatment also decreased the numbers of all sizes of tumors (>2 mm, 1–2 mm, and <1 mm) in the small intestine. Berberine suppressed tumor cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. Furthermore, berberine decreased the activation levels of Wnt and EGFR signaling pathways, and down-regulated COX-2 expression in intestinal tumor cells and prostaglandin E2 production in the small intestine.

Conclusions

Berberine inhibits intestinal tumor development, which is correlated with its activity to suppress tumor cell proliferation and increase apoptosis in Apc min/+ mice. Down-regulation of Wnt and EGFR signaling pathways and COX-2 expression by berberine may be involved in its anti-tumorigenic effects.

Keywords

  • Berberine
  • Intestinal tumor
  • Proliferation
  • Apoptosis
  • Wnt
  • Epidermal growth factor receptor
  • Apc min/+ mouse

Background

Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid, is present in several plants, such as Hydrastis canadensis (goldenseal), Berberis aquifolium (Oregon grape), and Berberis vulgaris (barberry). Berberine has a wide range of pharmacologic effects, including antimicrobial activities, lipid-lowering efficacy, and regulation of inflammatory responses [1, 2]. Recent studies have demonstrated that berberine has antineoplastic effects on several tumor cell lines in vitro, including gastrointestinal and liver tumor cells, through inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, inducing caspase-dependent/independent apoptosis, and attenuating reactive oxygen species production [3–7].

However, information regarding berberine’s effects on intestinal tumor development in vivo remains limited. The Apc min/+ mouse carries a germline mutation of the mouse adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) gene. The Apc gene is a tumor-suppressor gene homologous to the human Apc, and mouse carrying this mutation can spontaneously develop multiple tumors in the intestine [8, 9]. Since the Apc gene mutation plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic intestinal cancers in patients, Apc min/+ mouse model is considered as an ideal genetic animal model mimicking human intestinal tumorigenesis. Thus, we used this model for studying chemopreventive effects of berberine on intestinal tumor development.

Several signaling pathways have been reported to promote tumor development in intestinal tumorigenesis, including Wnt and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [10–12]. Apc gene which functions to target β-catenin for degradation has been linked to Wnt signaling pathway. Importantly, it has been shown that Apc deficiency is associated with increased EGFR activity in intestinal tumor of Apc min/+ mice [13]. Moreover, down-regulation of these activated signaling pathways has been reported to effectively inhibit growth of colon cancer cells in humans and tumor formation in Apc min/+ mice [12, 14]. This study was aimed to investigate chemopreventive effects and potential mechanisms of berberine on intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+ mouse model.

Methods

Mice and treatment

Apc min/+ mice on C57BL/6J background (purchased from Animal Model Institution of Nanjing University, P. R. China) were housed on a 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle. According to dosages in published reports [2, 4–6], 0.05% or 0.1% Berberine chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in drinking water was administered to 4-week old Apc min/+ mice for 12 weeks. Untreated Apc min/+ mice were used as the control. Mice were monitored daily for signs of illness. Body weight was recorded weekly. All animal experiments were performed according to the protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P. R. China.

Analysis of intestinal tumor development

Analysis of intestinal tumor development was performed as previously described [14–17]. The small intestine and colon were examined using an Olympus SZX7 stereo dissecting microscope. Tumors were categorized as large (>2 mm), medium (1–2 mm), and small (<1 mm). The number of tumors was recorded by the same investigator blinded to the treatment. Swiss-rolled whole small intestine and colon and the liver and the kidney tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for preparing Paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and observed under the light microscope to assess tumor stage and toxicity of the liver and the kidney. Tissue sections were also used for immunostaining.

Immunohistochemistry

To unmask antigens, the small intestinal sections were boiled for 15 min in Antigen Unmasking Solution (Vector laboratories, Inc. Burlingame, CA, USA). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation of sections in 3% H2O2 for 5 minutes. After blocking non-specific binding using 10% goat serum for 1 h, tissue sections were incubated with primary antibodies, mouse monoclonal anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), Ki-67 (Novocastra, New Castle, UK), and rabbit polyclonal anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), β-catenin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), cyclin D1 (Thermo Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), EGFR and phospho-EGFR (Tyr1068) (p-EGFR, Cell Signaling), phospho-extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK, Cell Signaling), phospho-Akt (p-Akt, Ser473) (Cell Signaling), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2, Cell Signaling). Then sections were incubated with peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG antibody and developed using DAB. The tissue sections were evaluated under the light microscope by the same investigator blinded to the treatment. At least three tumors in each mouse and five fields at 400X for each tumor were randomly selected for counting the number of positively stained cells. None of the selected fields were overlapped. Data were quantified by calculating percentage of the positive cell in each tumor, then obtaining the average of the percentages of positive cells in each tumor. A modified semiquantitative scoring system was used to calculate COX-2 immunoreactivity scoring, a scale of 0–4 for determining the percentage of positive cells (0, no staining; 1+, <25% of the epithelium stain positive; 2+, 25–50% positive; 3+, 50–75% positive; and 4+, >75% positive), and a scale of 0–3 for strength of intensity of staining (0, no staining; 1+, mild; 2+, moderate; and 3+, intense). The result was presented by the percentage scale X the strength of intensity scale.

TUNEL assay

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) was used to detect apoptotic cells [14–16]. Apoptotic cells were determined by counting percentage of positive-stained cells in five randomly selected fields in each tumor. At least three tumors in each mouse were randomly selected.

Preparation of tissue extracts

The tumor tissues from the distal small intestine were solubilized using Cell Lytic™ MT mammalian tissue lysis/extraction reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and homogenized. The lysates were centrifuged, and the supernatants were retained as total tissue extracts.

Nuclear fractions were prepared using the Nuclear Extraction Kit (Signosis, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Briefly, tumor tissues were cut into small pieces, rinsed twice with PBS. Then tissues were solubilized in Buffer I working reagent (10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L EDTA, supplemented with 1 mmol/L DTT and 1 mmol/L protease inhibitor] and homogenized until a single cell suspension was observed microscopically. After centrifugation, pellets were washed and resuspended in Buffer I. After shaking and centrifugation, the nuclear pellets were resuspended in Buffer II working reagent supplemented with 1 mmol/L DTT and 1 mmol/L protease inhibitor. Samples were centrifuged and the supernatant (nuclear extract) was frozen at −80°C.

Western blot analysis

The protein concentrations were determined using Bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Thermo Scientific Inc.). The total cellular lysates and nuclear fractions were mixed with Laemmli sample buffer for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blot using primary antibodies against β-catenin, EGFR, p-EGFR and COX-2, and then blotted with horseradish peroxidase conjugated second antibodies. The membranes were visualized using ECL (GE Healthcare, Bucks, UK). Anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a total cellular lysate loading control. Anti-histone H3 antibody (Cell signaling) was used as a nuclear protein loading control. The band density was detected using an image processor program (Image J), and was determined by comparing the density of the indicated band to the internal control band of the same mouse.

ELISA

Normal distal small intestinal mucosal tissues were collected for detecting the prostaglandin E2 level (PGE2) using ELISA kit (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, as previously described [9].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 13.0; Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows. Means and standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables. The multiplicity of intestinal tumors in each group was compared using One-way ANOVA analysis, followed by a post hoc multiple comparisons test. Student’s t-test was used to compare the percentage of positively stained cells or the fold changes of the ratio for the relative density of bands of berberine-treated group with those of untreated group. The level of statistically significance was set at two-tailed P < 0.05.

Results

Evaluation of side effects in Apc min/+mice treated with berberine

There was no mortality throughout the treatment period in untreated and in 0.05% and 0.1% berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice. We did not find any difference of food and fluid intake and growth rate in berberine-treated mice, compared to untreated Apc min/+ mice. No histopathologic alterations were found in the liver and the kidney of berberine-treated mice. Thus, no significant side effects by berberine treatment used in this study were found.

Berberine inhibits intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+mice

We first evaluated tumor development in 16-week old Apc min/+ mice with or without 12-week berberine treatment. Berberine significantly reduced the multiplicity of intestinal tumor in Apc min/+ mice in a dose-dependent manner (Table 1, Figure 1). Compared with the total number of tumor in the small intestine and the colon in untreated Apc min/+ mice (30.63 ± 1.69), 0.05% and 0.1% berberine treatment significantly decreased the number of tumor by 39.6% (18.50 ± 1.51, P < 0.01), and 62.5% (11.50 ± 2.05, P < 0.01, Figure 1B), respectively. Berberine reduced 62.0% and 31.2% of the number of colon tumor in 0.05% and 0.1% treatment groups (Figure 1B). In addition, tumor numbers in proximal, middle, and distal portions of the small intestine in 0.1% berberine-treated group were reduced by 53.7%, 55.3%, and 76.5%, respectively, while those in 0.05% group were reduced by 37.4%, 41.5%, and 42.0%, respectively. The numbers of all sizes of tumors (>2 mm, 1–2 mm, and <1 mm) in the small intestine were significantly reduced (Figure 1D). Adenomas with or without low-grade dysplasia were found in the small intestine and colon in untreated and berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice, and we did not find the difference regarding tumor stage in these two groups (data not shown).
Table 1

Effects of berberine on intestinal tumor multiplicity in Apc min/+ mice ( x ¯ ± S , n = 10)

 

Untreated mice

0.05% berberine

0.1% berberine

Total number

30.63 ± 1.69

18.50 ± 1.51*

11.50 ± 2.05$, &

Small intestinal

28.00 ± 2.00

16.69 ± 1.03*

10.50 ± 1.77$, &

    Proximal

8.38 ± 1.51

5.25 ± 1.16*

3.88 ± 0.64$, §

     Middle

9.50 ± 1.77

5.56 ± 0.50*

4.25 ± 1.04$

     Distal

10.13 ± 1.55

5.88 ± 0.83*

2.38 ± 0.92$, &

     <1 mm

8.13 ± 0.83

6.81 ± 0.65#

5.25 ± 1.04$, §

    1-2 mm

10.13 ± 1.36

6.19 ± 0.84*

3.25 ± 0.46$, &

     >2 mm

9.75 ± 2.05

3.69 ± 1.03*

2.00 ± 0.76$, §

Colon

2.63 ± 0.74

1.81 ± 0.65#

1.00 ± 0.46$, §

*, P < 0.01 and #, P < 0.05, 0.05% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice; $, P < 0.01 and ※, P < 0.05, 0.1% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice; &, P < 0.01 and §, P < 0.05, 0.1% berberine vs 0.05% berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Berberine inhibits intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+ mice. (A) Apc min/+ mice (age, 4 weeks) were treated with berberine, and sacrificed after 12 weeks. The representative gross appearance of the intestinal tumors from untreated and 0.1% berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice was shown under an Olympus SZX7 stereo dissecting microscope. (B) The number of tumors/mouse in the small intestine and colon in 0.05% and 0.1% berberine-treated groups were compared with the untreated Apc min/+ mice. (C-D) Tumor numbers in each section of the small intestine, and size distribution in each group were also listed. Columns, mean from the ten mice in each group; bars, standard deviation. *, P < 0.01 and #, P < 0.05, 0.05% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice; $, P < 0.01 and ※, P < 0.05, 0.1% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice; &, P < 0.01 and §, P < 0.05, 0.1% berberine vs 0.05% berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice.

Berberine suppresses cell proliferation and increases apoptosis in intestinal tumors

To further evaluate mechanisms of berberine’s effects on intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+ mice, we assessed tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis (Figure 2). We focused on comparison between samples from untreated Apc min/+ mice and 0.1% berberine-treated group, which showed the higher degree inhibition of intestinal tumor development. Immunostaining showed that berberine significantly decreased PCNA (44.60 ± 2.88 vs 65.80 ± 3.27, by 32%) and Ki-67 (6.73 ± 2.16 vs 14.89 ± 2.75, by 55%) positive cells (Figure 2A-B), suggesting that berberine inhibits tumor cell proliferation in Apc min/+ mice.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Berberine reduces proliferation and induced apoptosis in intestinal tumors of Apc min/+ mice. (A-B) Distal small intestinal sections from untreated and 0.1% berberine-treated mice were stained with PCNA and Ki-67. (C-D) Small intestinal segments from untreated and 0.1% berberine-treated groups were processed for TUNEL and cleaved caspase-3 staining (400×). Data were quantified as mean percentage of positive cells at five randomly selected fields in each sample. Scale bars, 50 μm. Columns, means from at least six mice in each group; bars, standard deviation. *, P < 0.01, 0.1% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice.

The apoptotic cells in tumors detected by TUNEL staining were significantly increased by 2.14 fold in berberine-treated mice compared with that in the untreated mice (10.52 ± 0.61 vs 4.92 ± 0.86, P < 0.01, Figure 2C). Moreover, berberine treatment increased caspase-3 activation detected by cleavage caspase-3 immunostaining of intestinal tissues (8.18 ± 1.45 vs 3.60 ± 1.34, P < 0.01, Figure 2D). Thus, these results suggest that inhibition of proliferation and promotion of apoptosis by berberine may play a role in the prevention of tumor development in Apc min/+ mice.

Berberine regulates signaling pathways in intestinal tumor of Apc min/+mice

We further studied the effects of berberine on signaling pathways involved in tumor development. It has been reported that cytoplasmic accumulation and nuclear translocation of β-catenin was found in Apc min/+ mice, which indicated the aberrant Wnt signaling. Immunostaining showed that berberine treatment decreased the percentage of positive cells of β-catenin in cytoplasm and/or nuclear of intestinal tumor in Apc min/+ mice (43.20 ± 1.63 vs 63.00 ± 3.08, P < 0.01, Figure 3A). Cell cycle arrest is associated with the expression of cell cycle regulators. Decreased cyclin D1, one of the key downstream molecules of Wnt signaling, promotes G1 arrest. Berberine reduced expression of cyclin D1 by 54% (24.80 ± 3.11 vs 54.40 ± 3.78, P < 0.01, Figure 3B). Furthermore, phosphorylation of EGFR, ERK, and Akt in intestinal tumors was suppressed by berberine treatment. The average percentages of p-EGFR-positive cells in berberine and untreated groups were 4.05 ± 2.74 vs 18.80 ± 3.74 (P < 0.01, Figure 3C), p-ERK-positive cells are 16.55 ± 1.54 vs 46.88 ± 7.25 (P < 0.01, Figure 3D), and p-Akt stained cells were 42.13 ± 7.76 vs 77.60 ± 8.36 (P < 0.01, Figure 3E), respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Berberine treatment regulates signaling pathways in intestinal tumors of Apc min/+ mice. (A-B) Immunohistochemical analyses of tumors using antibodies against β-catenin and cyclinD1 from the distal small intestine of untreated and 0.1% berberine-treated mice were shown (400×). Scale bars, 50 μm. Data were quantified as mean percentage of positive cells for β-catenin in cytoplasm and/or nuclear and cyclinD1 at five randomly selected fields. (C-E) p-EGFR, p-ERK and p-Akt were also analyzed by immunohistochemical staining. Data were quantified as mean percentage of positive cells. (F) Nuclear protein extracts were prepared from tumors, and analyzed by Western blot analysis using anti-β-catenin antibody. Anti-histone H3 antibody was used as a nuclear protein loading control. Protein lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western blot analysis using anti-total EGFR and p-EGFR antibodies, and anti-β-actin antibody was used as a protein loading control. The protein band ratio was calculated by comparing the relative density of the protein band for β-catenin, total EGFR, and p-EGFR to that of internal control band from the same mouse. The average ratio in control was set as 100%, the fold changes of the ratio in treated mice were shown. Columns, means from at least six mice in each group; bars, standard deviation. *, P < 0.01, 0.1% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice.

Moreover, the protein band ratio was calculated by comparing the relative density of the protein band on Western blots for β-catenin, total EGFR, and p-EGFR to that of internal control band from the same mouse. The average ratio in control was set as 100%, the fold changes of the ratio in treated mice were shown. The levels of these proteins were reduced in tumors of berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice compared with that of untreated group (P < 0.01, Figure 3F).

Berberine down-regulates COX-2 expression and PGE2production

Over expression of COX-2 and increased PGE2 production were reported to be associated with chronic inflammation and cell proliferation. Berberine significantly down-regulated COX-2 immunoreactivity in small intestinal tumors of Apc min/+ mice (3.38 ± 0.51 vs 7.60 ± 0.57, P < 0.01, Figure 4A-B). The expression level of COX-2 was significantly decreased in tumors of berberine-treated Apc min/+ mice, compared with that of untreated group (P < 0.01, Figure 4C). Berberine also decreased PGE2 production, a downstream product of COX-2, in normal mucosa (0.76 ± 0.08 vs 1.06 ± 0.10, P < 0.01; Figure 4D). The results suggest that the inhibition of COX-2 and PGE2 production by berberine may play a role in chemoprevention of intestinal tumorigenesis.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Berberine down-regulates COX-2 expression and PGE 2 production. (A-B) Tumors of the distal small intestine from untreated and 0.1% berberine-treated groups were immunostained using COX-2 antibody. Immunoreactivity scoring using a modified semiquantitative scoring system was shown (400×). Scale bars, 50 μm. (C) Protein lysates were prepared from tumors and analyzed by Western blot analysis. Anti-β-actin antibody was used as a protein loading control. The protein band ratio was calculated by comparing the relative density of the protein band on Western blots for COX-2 to that of internal control band from the same mouse. The average ratio in control was set as 100%, the fold change of the ratio in treated mice was shown. (D) PGE2 levels of normal mucosa from untreated and 0.1% berberine-treated groups were detected by ELISA. Columns, means from at least six mice in each group for immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis, and ten mice in each group for ELISA assay; bars, standard deviation. *, P < 0.01, 0.1% berberine-treated vs untreated Apc min/+ mice.

Discussion

Evaluation of ancient natural products that have been widely used for specific diseases, including berberine, has attracted attention to explore their broad clinical applications. Our studies suggest that berberine has the potential to prevent the growth and recurrence of intestinal precancerous lesions. Although aspirin and some specific COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib, have shown chemopreventive effects on colonic tumor development in animal model and some patients [9, 18–21], the potential gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects in patients limit their long-term use [22, 23]. Berberine has recently emerged as a potential chemopreventive agent due to its antineoplastic effects [3–7]. The in vitro activities of berberine may not represent the in vivo effects. Therefore, it is important to investigate the efficacy of berberine in vivo. The present study provides information regarding effects of berberine on intestinal tumor development using Apc min/+ mice model. Berberine was well tolerated, and significantly reduced the multiplicity of intestinal tumor in a dose-dependent manner. Berberine reduced cell proliferation and induced apoptosis, which are associated with inhibition of Wnt and EGFR signaling pathways in intestinal tumor of Apc min/+ mice. Our data also showed that berberine down-regulated COX-2 activity. These results, together with the recent study of prevention of azoxymethane-induced colon cancer by berberine in rats [24], support the chemopreventive effects of berberine on intestinal tumor.

Excessive proliferation and insufficient apoptosis are related to intestinal tumor development and progression [14, 25–27]. We found that berberine inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in tumor in Apc min/+ mice by regulating signaling pathways involved in proliferation and apoptosis. Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects play roles in inhibition of intestinal tumor formation and growth by berberine. One of the most important observations in the present study is that larger size tumors (>2 mm in the small intestine) were significantly decreased by berberine, suggesting that berberine exerts strong activity to limit progression of polyps.

Dysregulation of Wnt signaling pathway has been reported to play a major role in intestinal tumorigenesis in humans and Apc min/+ mice [10, 14, 28]. Truncated APC protein encoded by mutated gene causes cytoplasmic accumulation and nuclear translocation of β-catenin to transactivate T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor in the nucleus, leading to increasing transcription of many oncogenic genes including cyclin D1 [10]. Our data showed that the increased expressions of β-catenin in cytoplasm and nuclear in Apc min/+ mice were significantly decreased by berberine, which supports berberine’s role in antiproliferative mechanisms. These results are in consistence with the findings from the in vitro study showing that berberine inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer cells by inactivating Wnt/β-catenin signaling [29]. Further studies are required to characterize the exact mechanisms underlying berberine’s inhibitory effects on Wnt signaling, such as whether berberine inhibits β-catenin translocation into the nucleus or enhances β-catenin degradation.

EGFR signaling pathway activation is another key process in the development and progression of many tumors, including intestinal cancer [30]. Interestingly, Roberts et al. reported that Apc min/+ mice carrying an EGFR mutation with a marked reduction in EGFR activity had a 90% reduction in intestinal tumor compared with Apc min/+ mice expressing normal EGFR [31]. Recently, increasing evidence indicates that both Wnt and EGFR signaling pathways mediate β-catenin activation [32]. Aberrant Wnt pathway triggers pro-survival/anti-apoptotic signaling cascades activation such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway [33, 34]. We analyzed the activation of EGFR signaling pathway in intestinal tumors of Apc min/+ mice. Importantly, berberine treatment could significantly suppress EGFR activation and its downstream targets ERK and Akt. Therefore, we hypothesize that berberine inhibits intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+ mice through concomitant suppression of EGFR pathway, leading to decreasing tumor cell proliferation and increasing apoptosis.

Over expression of COX-2 and increased PGE2 production were reported to be associated with chronic inflammation and endothelial cell proliferation by releasing various angiogenic factors [35, 36], and boosting PGE2 production was also shown to be related to the polyps expansion [37]. Thus, the inhibition of COX-2 and PGE2 production by berberine may also play a role in chemoprevention of intestinal tumorigenesis.

Conclusions

The present study shows that berberine treatment significantly suppresses spontaneous intestinal tumor development in Apc min/+ mice, inhibits tumor cell proliferation, and induces apoptosis, which are associated with berberine’s activity to inhibit signaling pathways involved in tumor development. Thus, berberine may be a relatively nontoxic and low-cost agent to prevent intestinal tumor development.

Ethics approval

This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P. R. China.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81070283 to BW and 81300272 to HC), a grant from Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology for Young Scientists (13JCQNJC10600 to HC), and a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian (2010J0615 to TH).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
(2)
Department of Pathology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
(3)
Cancer Research Center, Xiamen University Medical College, Xiamen, China
(4)
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA

References

  1. Kong W, Wei J, Abidi P, Lin M, Inaba S, Li C, Wang Y, Wang Z, Si S, Pan H, Wang S, Wu J, Wang Y, Li Z, Liu J, Jiang JD: Berberine is a novel cholesterol-lowering drug working through a unique mechanism distinct from statins. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 1344-1351. 10.1038/nm1135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yan F, Wang L, Shi Y, Cao H, Liu L, Washington MK, Chaturvedi R, Israel DA, Cao H, Wang B, Peek RM, Wilson KT, Polk DB: Berberine promotes recovery of colitis and inhibits inflammatory responses in colonic macrophages and epithelial cells in DSS-treated mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012, 302: G504-G514. 10.1152/ajpgi.00312.2011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lin JP, Yang JS, Wu CC, Lin SS, Hsieh WT, Lin ML, Yu FS, Yu CS, Chen GW, Chang YH, Chung JG: Berberine induced down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-1, -2 and −9 in human gastric cancer cells (SNU-5) in vitro. In Vivo. 2008, 22: 223-230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chidambara Murthy KN, Jayaprakasha GK, Patil BS: The natural alkaloid berberine targets multiple pathways to induce cell death in cultured human colon cancer cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012, 688: 14-21. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.05.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang L, Cao H, Lu N, Liu L, Wang B, Hu T, Israel DA, Peek RM, Polk DB, Yan F: Berberine inhibits proliferation and down-regulates epidermal growth factor receptor through activation of Cbl in colon tumor cells. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e56666-10.1371/journal.pone.0056666.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang L, Liu L, Shi Y, Cao H, Chaturvedi R, Calcutt MW, Hu T, Ren X, Wilson KT, Polk DB, Yan F: Berberine induces caspase-independent cell death in colon tumor cells through activation of apoptosis-inducing factor. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e36418-10.1371/journal.pone.0036418.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jie S, Li H, Tian Y, Guo D, Zhu J, Gao S, Jiang L: Berberine inhibits angiogenic potential of Hep G2 cell line through VEGF down-regulation in vitro. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011, 26: 179-185. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06389.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moser AR, Pitot HC, Dove WF: A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science. 1990, 247: 322-324. 10.1126/science.2296722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnes CJ, Lee M: Chemoprevention of spontaneous intestinal adenomas in the adenomatous polyposis coli Min mouse model with aspirin. Gastroenterology. 1998, 114: 873-877. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70305-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pishvaian MJ, Byers SW: Biomarkers of WNT signaling. Cancer Biomark. 2007, 3: 263-274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yarom N, Jonker DJ: The role of the epidermal growth factor receptor in the mechanism and treatment of colorectal cancer. Discov Med. 2011, 11: 95-105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchanan FG, Holla V, Katkuri S, Matta P, DuBois RN: Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor for the prevention and treatment of intestinal cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 9380-9388. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moran AE, Hunt DH, Javid SH, Redston M, Carothers AM, Bertagnolli MM: Apc deficiency is associated with increased Egfr activity in the intestinal enterocytes and adenomas of C57BL/6J-Min/+ mice. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 43261-43272. 10.1074/jbc.M404276200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rajamanickam S, Velmurugan B, Kaur M, Singh RP, Agarwal R: Chemoprevention of intestinal tumorigenesis in APCmin/+ mice by silibinin. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 2368-2378. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3249.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Velmurugan B, Singh RP, Kaul N, Agarwal R, Agarwal C: Dietary feeding of grape seed extract prevents intestinal tumorigenesis in APCmin/+ mice. Neoplasia. 2010, 12: 95-102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Shen G, Khor TO, Hu R, Yu S, Nair S, Ho CT, Reddy BS, Huang MT, Newmark HL, Kong AN: Chemoprevention of familial adenomatous polyposis by natural dietary compounds sulforaphane and dibenzoylmethane alone and in combination in ApcMin/+ mouse. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 9937-9944. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Volate SR, Muga SJ, Issa AY, Nitcheva D, Smith T, Wargovich MJ: Epigenetic modulation of the retinoid X receptor alpha by green tea in the azoxymethane-Apc Min/+ mouse model of intestinal cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2009, 48: 920-933. 10.1002/mc.20542.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Half E, Arber N: Colon cancer: preventive agents and the present status of chemoprevention. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009, 10: 211-219. 10.1517/14656560802560153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacoby RF, Seibert K, Cole CE, Kelloff G, Lubet RA: The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib is a potent preventive and therapeutic agent in the min mouse model of adenomatous polyposis. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 5040-5044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Steinbach G, Lynch PM, Phillips RK, Wallace MH, Hawk E, Gordon GB, Wakabayashi N, Saunders B, Shen Y, Fujimura T, Su LK, Levin B: The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1946-1952. 10.1056/NEJM200006293422603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Reuter BK, Zhang XJ, Miller MJ: Therapeutic utility of aspirin in the ApcMin/+ murine model of colon carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2002, 2: 19-10.1186/1471-2407-2-19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Solomon SD, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Wittes J, Fowler R, Finn P, Anderson WF, Zauber A, Hawk E, Bertagnolli M, Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) Study Investigators: Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 1071-1080. 10.1056/NEJMoa050405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Solomon SD, Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Fowler R, Finn P, Levin B, Eagle C, Hawk E, Lechuga M, Zauber AG, Bertagnolli MM, Arber N, Wittes J, APC and PreSAP Trial Investigators: Effect of celecoxib on cardiovascular events and blood pressure in two trials for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Circulation. 2006, 114: 1028-1035. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.636746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Thirupurasundari CJ, Padmini R, Devaraj SN: Effect of berberine on the antioxidant status, ultrastructural modifications and protein bound carbohydrates in azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2009, 177: 190-195. 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maga G, Hubscher U: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116: 3051-3060. 10.1242/jcs.00653.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fu M, Wang C, Li Z, Sakamaki T, Pestell RG: Minireview: cyclin D1: normal and abnormal functions. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 5439-5447. 10.1210/en.2004-0959.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Yuan J: Caspases in apoptosis and beyond. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 6194-6206. 10.1038/onc.2008.297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Segditsas S, Tomlinson I: Colorectal cancer and genetic alterations in the Wnt pathway. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 7531-7537. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu K, Yang Q, Mu Y, Zhou L, Liu Y, Zhou Q, He B: Berberine inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer cells by inactivating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Int J Oncol. 2012, 41: 292-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. de Castro-Carpeño J, Belda-Iniesta C, Casado Sáenz E, Hernández Agudo E, Feliu Batlle J, González Barón M: EGFR and colon cancer: a clinical view. Clin Transl Oncol. 2008, 10: 6-13. 10.1007/s12094-008-0147-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts RB, Min L, Washington MK, Olsen SJ, Settle SH, Coffey RJ, Threadgill DW: Importance of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in establishment of adenomas and maintenance of carcinomas during intestinal tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 1521-1526. 10.1073/pnas.032678499.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu T, Li C: Convergence between Wnt-β-catenin and EGFR signaling in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2010, 9: 236-10.1186/1476-4598-9-236.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Agarwal A, Das K, Lerner N, Sathe S, Cicek M, Casey G, Sizemore N: The AKT/I kappa B kinase pathway promotes angiogenic/metastatic gene expression in colorectal cancer by activating nuclear factor-kappa B and beta-catenin. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 1021-1031. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208296.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharma M, Chuang WW, Sun Z: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt stimulates androgen pathway through GSK3beta inhibition and nuclear beta-catenin accumulation. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 30935-30941. 10.1074/jbc.M201919200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hernandez Y, Sotolongo J, Breglio K, Conduah D, Chen A, Xu R, Hsu D, Ungaro R, Hayes LA, Pastorini C, Abreu MT, Fukata M: The role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE 2) in toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated colitis-associated neoplasia. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010, 10: 82-10.1186/1471-230X-10-82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenhough A, Smartt HJ, Moore AE, Roberts HR, Williams AC, Paraskeva C, Kaidi A: The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment. Carcinogenesis. 2009, 30: 377-386. 10.1093/carcin/bgp014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Takeda H, Sonoshita M, Oshima H, Sugihara K, Chulada PC, Langenbach R, Oshima M, Taketo MM: Cooperation of cyclooxygenase 1 and cyclooxygenase 2 in intestinal polyposis. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4872-4877.PubMedGoogle Scholar

    38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/13/163/prepub

Copyright

© Cao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us