Skip to main content

Association of circulating tumor cell-white blood cell clusters with survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer after curative intent surgery



The analysis of circulating tumor cell-associated white blood cell (CTC-WBC) clusters represented the progress in the liquid biopsy of malignant tumors, however, related research in patients with colorectal cancer is still absent.


To explore associations between CTC-WBC clusters and the prognosis of these patients, we conducted an independent cohort of 329 colorectal cancer patients after curative intent surgery and pre-operative CTC detection in Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China between January 1, 2017, and September 31, 2019. The primary cohort referred to patients with CTC-WBC clusters positive. The control cohort was defined as those with exclusively CTCs positive. CTCs were enriched and distinguished by The CanPatrol™ system (SurExam, China). The Kaplan–Meier curve was used to compare the progressive-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between two groups. The COX regression model was used to assess the predictive value of CTC-WBC clusters.


Sixty three patients presented CTC-WBC clusters positive (CTC-WBC group) and 266 patients showed solely CTCs (CTC group). The number of CTCs was significantly different between two groups (P < 0.001) and the rest of clinical characteristics were not markedly associated with the presence of CTC-WBC clusters. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and OS exhibited that the CTC-WBC group had significantly shorter PFS (P = 0.011), while not for OS. The multivariate model further suggested that the CTC-WBC clusters (Hazard Ratio = 1.89, 95% Confidence Interval 1.02–3.51, P = 0.042) was an independent predictor for the PFS of in post-operation CRC patients.


The CTC-WBC cluster is significantly associated with recurrence after operation in CRC patients. This finding facilitates the evaluation of this indicator in tumor progression.

Peer Review reports


Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third-highest rate of estimated new cases and mortality worldwide [1]. The metastasis is found in 20% firstly-diagnosed CRC patients and among others who have only local lesions, 25% will develop metastatic clony(ies) in few months or years [2]. The intransigent metastasis and local recurrence are responsible for the majority of deaths for CRC patients. Common serological marker detection such as tumor cancer embryo antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) have limited accuracy for CRC. Therefore, finding a sensitive and convenient avenue of the early discrimination for patients at a high risk of recurrence and metastasis has become an important issue for clinicians.

The theories concerning tumor metastasis are complex and diverse, one is that circulating tumor cells may travel as individual cells or clusters from the primary site to the microvascular of distant tissues [3]. The circulating tumor cells (CTC) have been detected in a penal of common carcinomas, such as breast [4], prostate [5], lung [6], renal [7], bladder [8], liver [9] colon [10] and gastric cancer [11]. Known as liquid biopsy, CTCs are easy to collect, reducing the burden of invasive tissue biopsies, and are enable to reveal overall cancer genome features instead of constrained information from isolated tumor samples [12]. Current efforts mainly focus on the quantitative abundance, biological characteristics and genomic heterogeneity of CTCs to evaluate the haematological metastasis, recurrence of tumors and the response of chemotherapy. Clinical decisions can be made as early as possible for those who represent poor prognosis or have resistance to cancer targeted drugs due to heterogeneity between the origin and metastatic lesion. Our previous study provided proof that CTCs exhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) feature could serve as the monitor of therapy response in patients with gastric cancer before and after surgery as well as during adjuvant chemotherapy [13].

However, it is rather a challenge for tumor cells from the local site to overcome the high pressure and turbulences during blood borne dissemination, as well as the immune attack to seed in distant parenchyma, which makes it difficult for the detection of CTCs in a constant cut-off value [11]. Recent studies illustrated the concept that the migration ability of CTCs could be ameliorated by gathering into clusters, and further enhanced by close interaction of with white blood cells (WBC) and platelets in the blood microenvironment [14]. Szczerba et al. [15] has revealed the role of neutrophils as escorts in the blood steam to promote the cell cycle progression and accelerate metastasis formation in the breast cancer model. Researches seeking the crosstalk between the tumor prognosis and CTC-WBC clusters have been conducted in several cancers, including those of breast [15], lung [16], renal [17], liver [18] and gastric [19], but absent for CRC.

To investigate the prognostic value of CTC-WBC clusters in CRC, we conducted a retrospective, single-center study, comparing the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the CTC-WBC clusters positive group and the exclusively CTCs positive group in post-operative CRC patients based on a prospectively registered database in China.


Study design and patients

For this retrospective cohort study, we included an independent cohort of 329 CRC patients in total who had received palliative or radical surgery and CTC detection in Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. Patients were included between January 1, 2017, and September 31, 2019. The blood was drawn from patients for CTC testing approximately 1 week before they received surgery in our hospital and the primary data were collected in the database for later analysis. We constructed the primary cohort with patients who had a confirmed detection of CTC-WBC clusters positive. The control cohort was defined as the exclusively CTCs positive. The study was approved by the ethics review committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. None of the patients were treated with steroids or anti-inflammatory drugs that could affect blood immune cell counts before blood sample collection.

Data collection

The baseline data were obtained from the database of our hospital’s electronic medical record system, including gender, age, histological type, surgery type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, postoperative liver metastasis etc. Blood detection biomarkers included CTC data (number of CTCs, type of CTCs, CTC-WBC clusters) and pre-operative CEA, CA199. The disease progression was obtained from our follow-up system, including the disease condition after surgery, the date of recurrence, metastatic or death. Tumor staging was based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual [20]. OS was calculated from the date of surgery until death due to any cause. PFS covered the period from the date of surgery to disease progression or death occurred due to any reasons. The last follow-up date was August, 2020. We choose CTC data from 2017 to 2019 to explore associations between CTC-WBC clusters and the prognosis of CRC patients retrospectively.

Isolation and enumeration of CTCs and CTC-WBC clusters

5 ml peripheral blood samples were collected from CRC patients before surgery in EDTA tubes. CTCs were enriched and distinguished into subgroups by the CanPatrol™ CTC analysis system (SurExam, China) within 72 h after intravenous blood drawn. The collecting process was based on nano membrane filtration. The ribonucleic acid in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) method was adopted to subtype CTCs. The epithelial type was identified using fluorescently labeled antibodies against the epithelial cell adhesion antigen (EpCAM), cytokeratoin 8, 18, and 19. The mesenchymal type was detected by the expression of Vimentin and Twist protein. Leukocyte biomarkers CD45 were used to intercept CTC-WBC clusters. The red fluorescent signal dots represented epithelial-like CTCs and the green dots referred to mesenchymal-like CTCs. The mixed type was observed as a hybrid of red and green dots. CTC-WBC clusters labelled by CD45 were stained as white dots scattered by red, green, or red/green mixture under the automated fluorescence microscope (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The epithelial type presented as the red fluorescent signal points (A); the mesenchymal type presented as the green fluorescent signal points (B); the mixed type presented as both red and green fluorescent signal points (C); CTC-WBC cells appeared as white dots surrounded by red, green, or red/green fluorescent signals points (D)

Statistical analysis

All data were collected and analyzed in SPSS version 22.0 (IBM) and R version 4.0.2. The histological type of CRC was classified into nonspecific adenocarcinoma, specific adenocarcinoma (mucosal adenocarcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma) and the mixed. The threshold of CTC number was set according to the median. The baseline data were assessed with the unpaired, 2-tailed Pearson's chi-square tests after the patients were divided into cohorts. The Kaplan–Meier curve was used to compare the prognosis for the CTC-WBC positive group and the exclusively CTC positive group. The Kaplan–Meier curve was checked by the log-rank test. We used the univariate cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the predictive value of CTC-WBC clusters and other indicators. Relevant influencing factors were incorporated in the multivariate cox proportional hazards analysis to compare PFS. In general, 2-sided P < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference.


Baseline characteristics

In this study, a total of 329 post-operation CRC patients were consecutively included. All of them were evaluable and admitted in the final analysis. Among these patients, 218 (66.3%) were men and 111 (33.7%) were women. The age ranged from 16 to 88 and the median age was 58. Most patients have undergone radical surgery (291 cases, 88.4%), the remaining patients were diagnosed as stage IV and could only receive palliative surgery (38 cases, 11.6%). The disease severity was staged according to the TNM system, where 41 (12.5%) patients with stage I, 114 (34.7%) patients with stage II, 144 (43.8%) patients with stage III and 30 (9.1%) patients with stage IV. The median number (Inter-quartile Range) of CTCs was 6/5 mL blood (1–116 mL blood), and 176 (53.5%) patients showed the number of CTCs >6. For the type of CTCs, mesenchymal phenotype was expressed in 296 (90.0%) patients. The clinicopathological features classified by CTC-WBC clusters are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinicopathological features in postoperative colorectal cancer patients

Comparisons of CTC versus CTC-WBC

Among 329 patients, 63 (19.1%) patients presented CTC-WBC clusters positive (CTC-WBC group) and 266 (80.9%) patients showed solely CTCs (CTC group). The number of CTCs, which divided by the median 6 was significantly different between two groups (P < 0.001). We aimed to compare the influence of CTC-WBC clusters on liver metastasis after the surgery, while there is no significant difference between the two (P = 0.274). Next, we investigated whether immune cells induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition feature. Although only 33 (10.0%) patients showed exclusively epithelial CTCs, the CTC-WBC cluster was not correlated with EMT (P = 0.433). The rest of clinical characteristics was not markedly associated with the present of CTC-WBC clusters.

Survival outcomes

The follow-up duration ranged from 11 to 43 months, with a median of 30 months. Eighteen patients have received pre-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, among them 2 patients showed pathological complete response, 1 showed stable disease, the others showed partial response. There were 44 (13.4%) deaths in total and three of them died of non-neoplastic causes. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and OS were illustrated to compare the CTC-WBC and CTC group, exhibiting that the CTC-WBC group showed significantly shorter PFS (P = 0.011, Fig. 2A) than the latter, while not for OS (P = 0.72, Fig. 2B). The univariate Cox risk proportional regression analysis demonstrated that the surgery type [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 6.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.74–10.22, P < 0.001], tumor stage (HR = 5.36, 95% CI 2.81–10.23, P < 0.001), preoperative CEA (HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.28–3.50, P = 0.004), and CTC-WBC/CTC group (HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.17–3.79, P = 0.013) were significantly correlated with the progression free survival (Table 2). The multivariate model further suggested that the CTC-WBC cluster (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.02–3.51, P = 0.042), the surgery type (HR = 3.52, 95% CI 1.98–6.24, P < 0.001) and the pTNM stage (HR = 3.39, 95% CI 1.69–6.80, P = 0.001) were all independent predictors for the PFS of post-operative CRC patients. (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation of CTC group and CTC-WBC group with PFS (a) and OS (b) in post-operation CRC patients

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS in post-operation CRC patients


In the present study, we found that CTC-WBC cluster was associated with worse progressive-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer after radical or palliative surgery. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis underscored the independent influence of CTC-WBC clusters for PFS as well. The detection of changing levels of CTCs provides a “liquid biopsy” approach to monitor therapy responses during the course of treatment. Compared to medical image scans and laparoscopy, CTC detection commonly costs less and is conducted more conveniently with a blood test. It could give clues for tumor progression before measurable changes found in the image, as early as 4 weeks from the beginning of therapy [21]. As for routine serological examination like tumor markers, researches show that the surveillance of CTC have an increased sensitivity without the disturbance from nonmalignant conditions [22]. From the count of single CTC, to the comprehensive acquirement of tumor functional representatives, this weapon has been continuously optimized with multiple detection strategies including a package with WBCs. Our findings hold promise for the CTC-WBC cluster becoming a new therapeutic target through disassembling of this package.

Long before the last decade, the value of CTC for tumor prognosis had been understood by oncology researchers, and a large number of studies using cytometric methods or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches had been conducted in colorectal cancer and confirmed the prognostic value of CTC. Later, the CellSearch system (Veridex LLC) was established and became popular [23, 24]. However, this method using anti-EpCAM-coated magnetic beads to capture markers absent from leukocytes has considerable limitations in detecting EMT CTCs, which have been proven to be linked to a worse treatment response in gastric cancer patients by our previous study [13]. In addition, due to the low detection rate of CTC in patients with early staged CRC, the uncertainty of the CTC cut-off value will bewilder the interpretation of the carcinoma prediction by CTC. In a prospective multicenter study of 519 patients with stage III CRC recruited, no significant association was seen between CTC enumeration and the prognosis [25]. Nevertheless, there has been an increased interest regarding the possible use of the association between tumor cells and immune cells. In the present study, we used an improved CanPatrol™ CTC enrichment technique to unbiasedly isolate CTCs and CTC-WBC clusters. The system combined the superiority of CD45+ leukocytes depletion and isolation of CTCs by size, which is more efficient and duplicable for CTC gathering and enumeration [26].

The role of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) as a driver of tumor progression have been drilled down deeply by previous studies. Specific examples of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β shaping the pro-tumorigenic (N2) or antitumorigenic (N1) effects of TAN were demonstrated [27]. However, trials exploring the correlation between CTC-WBC clusters and the prognosis in cancer patients have been blank until the inspiration by Szczerba et al. [15]. The research revealed the mechanism of interactions between CTCs and WBC-clusters in breast cancer mouse models. They found that the proportion of neutrophils in CTC-WBC clusters ranged from 85.5 to 91.7% whereas only a minority (8.3–14.5%) were monocytes, which was consistent with studies reporting an association between a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and poor clinical outcomes in various cancers [28]. Szczerba et al. also showed that CTCs from CTC–WBC clusters were predisposed to be exuberant in positive regulators of cell cycle and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication programs compared to CTCs alone and could express genes that encode granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which facilitated pro-tumor activities like neutrophil recruitment, Bv8 expression and angiogenesis [29,30,31]. On the contrary, genes involved in EMT were not related with the interaction between CTCs and neutrophils. Accordingly, in our study, although only 33 (10%) patients expressed epithelial solely CTC, no significant association was observed between CTC-WBC positive and mesenchymal phenotype. However, the sample size derived from patients in Szczerba’s study were small with merely 34 heterogenous CTC-detectable patients. In the absence of confounding cause adjustment, the bonus influence of CTC-WBC clusters could be attenuated.

Although TANs were identified as the supporting factors mediating distant CRC metastasis, especially liver metastasis [32], the therapeutic benefit of CTC-WBC clusters in CRC patients has not been studied so far. Our study mainly focused on validating the prediction value of CTC-WBC clusters in CRC patients after surgery. By means of the Kaplan–Meier survival curves, a significant shorter progression-free survival period could be seen compared with the CTC-WBC negative group. The univariate Cox risk proportional regression analysis proposed that the surgery type, tumor stage, preoperative CEA and CTC-WBC/CTC group were all independent predicting factors correlated with poor PFS and the multivariate analysis further suggested that CTC-WBC clusters was an independent predictor for the PFS of post-operative CRC patients after adjustments with all of these factors.

The study has several limitations. The significant association with CTC-WBC clusters was neither exhibited in the overall survival, nor the post-operative liver metastasis. Among the primary culprit for causing is the small number of cases from the single-center. Also, a longer follow-up and a consistent CTC monitor after the surgery are needed. The first two factors induce insufficient end-point events, while the latter indicates the lack of pre- and post-operative comparisons and subsequent long-term surveillance. In addition, the post-operative chemotherapy information of patients was not included due to the discharge of patients, which prevented us from adjusting the influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis or evaluating the therapy efficacy via CTC-WBC clusters. The failure in predicting liver metastasis may be explained by these reasons. Finally, the study was limited by the inherent flaws of retrospective studies and wanted in an extensive exploration of molecular mechanisms as we mentioned above. More work will need to be done to establish multi-center prospective studies with larger-scale samples and a longer follow-up duration.


In summary, our study found the presence of CTC-WBC clusters in peripheral blood of preoperative CRC patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CTC-WBC cluster at baseline was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival and could serve as an independent predictor for CRC patients undergone radical or palliative surgery, while not for the overall survival. These clinical sample data provide clues for a more convenient and predictive monitoring for CRC patients and indicate a supplementary tool to early identify the occult progression of tumors. The prognosis could be improved by the timely adjustment of chemotherapy and surgery program. It is worth noting that larger-scale, multi-center and prospective studies are needed to obtain more convincing evidence.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Colorectal cancer


Cancer embryo antigen


Carbohydrate antigen 199


Circulating tumor cell


Epithelial-mesenchymal transition


White blood cell


CTC-associated white blood cell


Progression free survival


Overall survival


Ribonucleic acid in situ hybridization


Epithelial cell adhesion antigen


Confidence interval


Hazard ratio


Polymerase chain reaction


Tumor-associated neutrophils


Transforming growth factor






Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio


Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor


Deoxyribonucleic acid


  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. Ca-Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biller LH, Schrag D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. JAMA. 2021;325:669–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambert A, Pattabiraman D, Weinberg R. Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell. 2017;168:670–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang H, Lin X, Huang Y, et al. Detection methods and clinical applications of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pantel K, Hille C, Scher HI. Circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer: from discovery to clinical utility. Clin Chem. 2019;65:87–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapeleris J, Kulasinghe A, Warkiani ME, et al. The prognostic role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rossi E, Fassan M, Aieta M, et al. Dynamic changes of live/apoptotic circulating tumour cells as predictive marker of response to sunitinib in metastatic renal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1286–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rink M, Chun FK, Dahlem R, et al. Prognostic role and HER2 expression of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients prior to radical cystectomy: a prospective study. Eur Urol. 2012;61:810–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn JC, Teng PC, Chen PJ, et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells and their implications as a biomarker for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic monitoring in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2021;73:422–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Dalum G, Stam GJ, Scholten LF, et al. Importance of circulating tumor cells in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:1361–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pernot S, Badoual C, Terme M, et al. Dynamic evaluation of circulating tumour cells in patients with advanced gastric and oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma: prognostic value and early assessment of therapeutic effects. Eur J Cancer. 2017;79:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nordgard O, Tjensvoll K, Gilje B, et al. Circulating tumour cells and DNA as liquid biopsies in gastrointestinal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e110–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li T. Evaluation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitioned circulating tumor cells in patients with resectable gastric cancer: relevance to therapy response. World J Gastroentero. 2015;21:13259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heeke S, Mograbi B, Alix-Panabieres C, et al. Never travel alone: the crosstalk of circulating tumor cells and the blood microenvironment. Cells. 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Szczerba BM, Castro-Giner F, Vetter M, et al. Neutrophils escort circulating tumour cells to enable cell cycle progression. Nature. 2019;566:553–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu HH, Liu YT, Feng Y, et al. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) and their subtypes in small cell lung cancer: predictors for response and prognosis. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12:2749–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guan Y, Xu F, Tian J, et al. The prognostic value of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and CTC white blood cell clusters in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo Q, Wang C, Peng B, et al. Circulating tumor-cell-associated white blood cell clusters in peripheral blood indicate poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qiu Y, Zhang X, Deng X, et al. Circulating tumor cell-associated white blood cell cluster is associated with poor survival of patients with gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy. EJSO. 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiser MR. AJCC 8th edition: colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1454–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Budd G, Cristofanilli M, Ellis M, et al. Circulating tumor cells versus imaging – predicting overall survival in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6403–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Allard W, Matera J, Miller MC, et al. Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:6897–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riethdorf S, Fritsche H, Müller V, et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a validation study of the cell search system. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:920–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Torino F, Bonmassar E, Bonmassar L, et al. Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:759–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sotelo MJ, Sastre J, Maestro ML, et al. Role of circulating tumor cells as prognostic marker in resected stage III colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:535–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu S, Liu Z, Liu S, et al. Enrichment and enumeration of circulating tumor cells by efficient depletion of leukocyte fractions. CCLM. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fridlender ZG, Sun J, Kim S, et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: “N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:183–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JNCI. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kowanetz M, Wu X, Lee J, et al. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor promotes lung metastasis through mobilization of Ly6G+Ly6C+ granulocytes. P Natl A SCI. 2010;107:21248–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qu X, Zhuang G, Yu L, et al. Induction of Bv8 expression by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in CD11b+Gr1+ cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:19574–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shojaei F, Wu X, Qu X, et al. G-CSF-initiated myeloid cell mobilization and angiogenesis mediate tumor refractoriness to an-ti-VEGF therapy in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:6742–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mizuno R, Kawada K, Itatani Y, et al. The role of tumor-associated neutrophils in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2021A1515011146), Guangdong Provincial Major Talents Project (Grant No. 2019JC05Y361) and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Cancer (Grant No. 2020B121201004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



YX and QZ contributed equally to clinical data interpretation, statistical analysis, the manuscript preparation and editing. ZX, QX, and WD contributed equally to study design, data acquisition from the laboratory and associated quality control. HL and HD contributed equally to the propose of study concepts and manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Liu or Haijun Deng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics review committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Zhang, Q., Xu, Z. et al. Association of circulating tumor cell-white blood cell clusters with survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer after curative intent surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 503 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: