Skip to main content

Long-term prognosis of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer according to submucosal invasion: a multicenter cohort study



Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can provide a high en bloc resection rate and has been widely applied as curative treatment for early colorectal cancer (ECC). However, surgical treatment is occasionally required, and reports on the long-term prognosis of ESD are insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of ECC removal by ESD, including local recurrence and metastasis.


This multicenter study was conducted retrospectively on 450 consecutive patients with ECC who were treated with ESD between November 2003 and December 2013. Clinical, pathological, and endoscopic data were collected to determine tumor depth, resection margin, lymphovascular invasion, and recurrence.


The median follow-up period was 53.8 (12–138 months). The en bloc resection rate was 85.3% (384) and in intramucosal cancer being 84.1% and in superficial submucosal invasion (SM1) cancer being 89.8% (p = 0.158). The curative resection rate was 76.0% (n = 342), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (77.3% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.231). The overall recurrence free survival rate (RFS) was 98.7% (444/450). In patients with curative resection, there was no statistically significant difference in RFS according to invasion depth (intramucosal: 99.3% vs. SM1: 97.1%, p = 0.248).


Patients with curatively resected ECC treated with ESD showed favorable long-term outcomes. Curatively resected SM1 cancer has a RFS similar to that of intramucosal cancer.

Peer Review reports


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide [1]. The CRC is predicted to cause 2.2 million new cases and 1.1 million deaths by 2030 [2]. Since most CRCs originate from colon adenoma [3], screening by performing colonoscopy to identify early and resect these adenomas plays an important role in cancer prevention [4]. Recently, with the implementation of CRC screening programs, there is an increase and the widespread use of high-resolution endoscopes [5]. Hence, it is predicted that patients would be diagnosed with early stage of CRC more frequently [6].

The prognosis of patients with CRC is rudimentary, as determined by the stage of the cancer at the time of diagnosis. According to the recent data, nearly 75% of newly diagnosed CRC is in early stage of cancer without metastasis [7, 8]. Early CRC (ECC) is defined as cancer cells that are confined to the mucosa and submucosa with or without metastasis to lymph nodes or other organs [9,10,11] An ECC can be completely removed surgically, the 5-year survival rate is greater than 90%, and the prognosis is satisfactory [12, 13].

The risk of complications in patients undergoing traditional surgical resection is high (20%) [14]; hence, the demand for endoscopic resection is increasing. Recently, endoscopic resection, which can be selectively employed for stage I cancer, has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of complications [15, 16]. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can provide a high en bloc resection rate and is widely accepted as a treatment for ECC [17,18,19,20].

According to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) 2019 guidelines, intramucosal or superficial submucosal invasive (SM1) CRC (defined by the depth of invasion from the muscularis mucosa as less than 1,000 um) is an indication for endoscopic resection [21].

There is an increase in the number of studies on the outcomes of ESD; however, data on the long-term outcomes of ESD for ECC are insufficient. This is because the results of previous studies were confined to pedunculated polyp lesions [22], patients with high-grade dysplasia and adenomas accounted for the majority of the study subjects [23,24,25], or the number was not sufficiently large [26]. Particularly, the data on the long-term outcomes of SM1 cancer removal by ESD is insufficient.

Hence, this study aimed to identify the long-term outcomes of ESD for superficial ECC, including recurrences and metastasis, and to evaluate the differences in the pathologic features for risk assessment of recurrence according to the submucosal invasion.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

Between November 2003 and December 2013, a total of 783 patients who underwent ESD for CRC at nine Korean ESD study group-affiliated hospitals (Asan Medical Center, Hallym University Medical Center, Presbyterian Medical Center, Samsung Medical Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Ewha Woman’s University Medical Center, and Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital) were considered for enrollment in this study. The patients were retrospectively selected according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) age > 20 years, (2) sufficient pathological reports, and (3) no history of previous or synchronous cancer. Based on the following criteria, 333 patients were excluded: (1) deep submucosal invasion (≥ 1000 um, SM2) in the pathological results, (2) in the case of poorly differentiated carcinoma or carcinoma other than adenocarcinoma, and (3) follow-up for less than 12 months and incomplete data. The remaining 450 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study (Fig. 1). The medical records of all patients were reviewed to obtain clinical information. The patients were allocated by the depth of cancer invasion into intramucosal cancer (n = 352, 78.2%) and SM1 cancer (n = 98, 21.8%). For the purpose of analysis, the patients were divided into two groups according to curative resection. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, and was approved by the institutional review boards of all the participating hospitals (IRB No. 2015-06-074-002).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient selection flowchart. Abbreviations: ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, ECC early colorectal cancer, SM submucosa, PM proper muscle

ESD procedure

An ESD for CRC was performed by a gastrointestinal endoscopist who was highly specialized in therapeutic colonoscopy procedures. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients enrolled in this study. Before performing ESD, the endoscopist estimated the location and size of the CRC and determined whether ESD was applicable. When endoscopic gross morphological findings suggestive of submucosal invasion, such as Kudo’s pit pattern or non-lifting sign, were observed, then surgery was recommended instead of ESD. All ESD procedures were performed using a standard single-accessory-channel endoscope while the patient was under conscious sedation. A mixture of normal saline, glycerin, and/or sodium hyaluronate with a small amount of indigo carmine was injected into the submucosal space using a 21- or 23-gauge needle. Electrosurgical instruments, such as flex, hook, dual, insulated tip (IT), and IT-nano knives, were selected at the discretion of the endoscopist and used for mucosal incision and submucosal dissection. The submucosal layer was directly dissected using one of the designated knives until complete removal was achieved. After ESD, prophylactic endoscopic hemostasis and clipping were performed on the exposed vessels with oozing, bleeding, or damaged muscle layers.

Histological evaluation of ESD specimens

Resected ESD specimens were retrieved using forceps, suctioning, or nets, stretched to an approximate length, and fixed using anti-rust pins on a Styrofoam surface. The full thickness of each specimen was pinned to identify the depth of invasion and the horizontal margin. After macroscopic observation, the ESD specimens were cut parallel to the direction of the closest margin. Specimens were step-sectioned at 1 or 2 mm intervals and then examined. The depth of submucosal invasion was defined as the distance from the deeper edge of the muscularis mucosa to the deepest invasive portion. When the muscularis mucosa could not be identified, the depth of submucosal invasion was considered as the distance between the tumor surface and the deepest invasive portion. Immunostaining including D2-40 and VB was selectively performed when additional evaluation was required, such as unclear lymphovascular structures. All CRC specimens were histologically evaluated and classified according to the World Health Organization system [27].

In this study, CRC was classified as intramucosal carcinoma, carcinoma with superficial submucosal invasion (< 1000 um) (SM1), carcinoma with deep submucosal invasion (≥ 1000 um) (SM2), and carcinoma with proper muscle invasion (PM).


En bloc resection was defined as cancer resection in one piece without fragmentation [10, 20, 28, 29]. Complete histological resection was defined as negative vertical and horizontal margins. The definition of curative resection in this study meant histologically complete resection with no risk of lymph node metastasis on histological examination of CRC specimen based on the JSCCR guidelines: (1) well or moderate differentiation, (2) negative resection margins, (3) no lymphovascular invasion, (4) tumor budding grade 1 (low), and (5) submucosal invasion depth < 1000 um (SM1) [21]. Recurrence was defined as cases where cancer was observed at the site where prior ECC was removed, lymph node metastasis was confirmed, and metachronous cancer occurred during the follow-up period.

Surveillance after ESD

All study subjects underwent intensive follow-up. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed at one year for patients who underwent curative resection, and at six months and one year for patients who underwent non-curative resection for tumors showing a histologically positive horizontal and deep margins. All enrolled patients underwent at least one follow-up colonoscopy. For early detection of recurrence, computed tomography (CT) scan were recommended once every 1–2 years for mucosal cancer and once every 6–12 months for SM cancer. Tumor marker tests (eg, cancer embryonic antigen) were tested annually only in some cases because follow-up is not recommended in early colorectal cancer below stage I. To evaluate the long-term outcomes, retrospective analysis of the recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence, local recurrence, and metachronous occurrence rates was performed.

Statistical analyses

The primary study endpoint was RFS in patients with intramucosal cancer and SM1 cancer removed using ESD. The clinical characteristics of the study subjects are expressed as medians (ranges) for continuous variables and numbers (percentages) for categorical variables. The differences between categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, Student’s t-test, chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test. RFS rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Differences in RFS curves among groups were assessed using the log-rank test. Two-tailed p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp. (Released 2017), IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows; Armonk, NY, USA).


Baseline clinical characteristics

A total of 450 patients (tumor stage 0–I, CRC with < 1000 um submucosal invasion) analyzed, including 271 men (60.2%), and the mean age of the patients was 61.2 ± 10.3 years. Concomitant chronic diseases included hypertension (28.9%), cardiovascular disease (4.2%), diabetes (11.1%), liver cirrhosis (6.4%), and renal insufficiency (1.1%). The patients on antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants were 11.1%. The proportion of patients with cancer located in the rectum was 48.7%, followed by right colon (27.3%), and left colon (24.0%). The median tumor size was 28 mm (8–102). The en bloc resection rate of all patients was 85.3% (384/450), that of intramucosal cancer was 84.1%, of SM1 cancer was 89.8%. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the en bloc resection rates (p = 0.158). There are no statistically significant differences between intramucosal cancer and SM1 cancer in the baseline clinical characteristics except for morphology. The detailed baseline clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics of study subjects

Histological characteristics of ECC patients treated with ESD

According to histological assessments, 352 patients (78.2%) had intramucosal cancer and 98 patients (21.8%) had SM1 cancer. (Fig. 1) The number of patients who met the JSCCR criteria for curative resection was 342 (76.0%) (Table 2). Well differentiated adenocarcinomas were identified in 343 patients (76.2%), and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas were identified in 107 patients (23.8%). Positive lymphatic invasion was observed in nine patients (2.0%), positive vascular invasion was observed in five patients (1.1%), and intermediate tumor budding was observed in two patients (0.4%). The pathological features associated with recurrence were significantly higher in SM1 cancer than in intramucosal cancer. There was no difference in the curative resection rate between the two groups according to the depth of invasion (272/352, 77.3% vs. 70/98, 71.4%; p = 0.231).

Table 2 Histological features of early colorectal cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection

Long-term outcomes after ESD in CRC patients

The median follow-up period was 53.8 (12–138 months). The RFS rates were 98.7% (444/450) in all enrolled patients (Fig. 2A) and in curatively resected patients were 98.8%, 4 patients (1.2%) had recurrence. The RFS rate showed no statistically significant differences with respect to depth of invasion (p = 0.532) (Fig. 2B). A total of 4 recurrences were observed among the curatively resected patients (Fig. 3A), and two cases of recurrence were observed in each group (Fig. 3B). In intramucosal cancer, one distant metastasis and one metachronous cancer were detected, and in SM1 cancer, two distant lymph node metastases were detected during the follow-up period. In one case of SM1 cancer recurrence, the vertical margin was 1500 μm and the safety margin was 1225 μm, and in another case, the vertical margin was 600 μm and the safety margin was only 300 μm. The clinical and histological features of the recurrence after ESD are shown in Table 3. In 143 patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, there was no recurrence except for one case in which cancer was additionally confirmed at a site different from the site removed by ESD at the time of diagnosis. Non-curatively resected patients underwent additional surgical treatment or were closely observed. Among non-curatively resected intramucosal cancer, only 5 (6.25%) underwent additional surgery, and among submucosal cancer, 12 (42.9%) underwent additional surgery. No recurrence was observed in patients who underwent additional surgery, but recurrence was confirmed in 2 patients who underwent close observation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrating cumulative recurrence free survival rates in A overall enrolled ECC patients and B according to depth of cancer invasion

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrating cumulative recurrence free survival rates A in curatively resected ECC patients and B according to depth in curatively resected patients

Table 3 Clinical features of the recurrence cases


In this large-scale multicenter study, the clinical and histological features of superficial CRC treated with ESD was reviewed and long-term follow-up outcomes were analyzed. It was observed that the 5-year RFS rate of superficial CRC curatively resected using ESD was 98.8% (338/342), and this result is a favorable outcome. Based on the results, although there was no difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups according to the depth of cancer, it was observed that histological features related to recurrence were significantly higher in SM1 cancer. Nevertheless, the RFS rates were satisfactorily high in both groups (99.3% vs. 97.1%), and no statistically significant difference was found between two groups (p = 0.248) (Fig. 3B).

Previous studies have reported favorable long-term outcomes of ESD for CRC [22,23,24,25,26, 30]; however, the prior reported studies had some limitations. The follow-up period was not long enough to confirm the long-term outcomes [23, 25]. The proportion of patients with ECC included in the study was insufficient [23, 25, 26, 30], and patients with high-grade dysplasia were included in the analysis [25]. Therefore, the previously reported studies could not sufficiently represent the long-term outcomes for ECC resected by ESD. In this study, only patients with ECC resected using ESD were evaluated, and a relatively large number of patients were analyzed.

Submucosal lymphatic vessels play an important role in lymphovascular invasion of CRC. Smith et al. reported that submucosal lymphatic vessels were more developed in SM1 than in SM3 colorectal tissue, although there was no difference in vessel size [31]. Consequently, the width of cancer invasion may be associated with greater access to the lymphatic system than the depth, and may subsequently be associated with a higher risk of lymph node metastasis [32]. A submucosal invasion width of more than 11.5 mm or invasion area more than 35 mm2 has important implications in the prediction of the presence of lymph node metastasis [33]. In this context, it is necessary to analyze whether the long-term outcomes of SM1 CRC curatively resection with ESD is different from that of intramucosal cancer. This study included many patients with SM1 cancers, enabling statistical analysis of the differences in the characteristics between SM1 and intramucosal cancers. In this study, lymphatic invasion was significantly higher in patients with SM1 cancer. Additionally, lymphatic invasion and other pathological findings related to recurrence were significantly higher. Nevertheless, a low RFS rate was observed, and there was no statistically significant difference in the RFS rate. Based on this study results, SM1 invasion in curatively resected ECC did not seem to have a noticeable effect on the prognosis.

The en bloc resection rate of ESD for superficial CRCs were examined. In this study, the en bloc resection rates for CRC were high [25, 30, 34]. One study showed a nearly 100% en bloc resection rate [20]. In this study, the en bloc resection rate was 85.3%, this was rather low as compared with the results of other studies. This difference was due to the deviation in the enrolled study subjects. Some studies with high en bloc resection rates included adenoma [23] and high-grade dysplasia cases [20]. For large-sized cancer, a part of the submucosal dissection lesion was removed in the middle of the procedure to secure the field of view, and the rest was then dissected. The number of large lesions also affects en bloc resection rate. The 85% is considered to be a sufficiently high level of en bloc rate in ECC with submucosal cancer [26].

Except for the case where metachronous cancer was confirmed, recurrence was confirmed in one case of piecemeal resection, where the resection margin could be evaluated, and in two SM1 cancers. The known significant factors associated with recurrence are granular type laterally spreading tumors, tumor size 40 mm or more, no pre-treatment magnification, more than10 years of experience in conventional endoscopic resection, and piecemeal resection only in ESD [35]. Although this study was a large-scale study, the treatment outcomes of superficial CRC through ESD was excellent, though there were few recurrence cases, and the factors affecting the recurrence could not be identified. If the tumor size is > 40 mm or if piecemeal resection is performed, active surveillance should be considered, even if the ECC is curatively resected. To identify factors associated with poor outcomes in SM1 cancer, additional large-scale studies are required.

The present study had several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, and it was inherently limited by the retrospective nature of the clinical data collected during the follow-up. Second, although the median follow-up period was relatively short (53.8 months), the follow-up period of most patients was more than 5 years, which was suitable for evaluating long-term prognosis. Additionally, all enrolled patients underwent appropriate follow-up colonoscopy and computed tomography for the evaluation of recurrence for more than 1 year. Third, although the total number of patients was large enough, the small number of recurrent cases may have made the identification of reliable risk factors difficult. Since this study was conducted on patients with early-stage cancer, it is inevitable that there were fewer recurrence cases. Despite these limitations, this study was considered to be sufficient to demonstrate the long-term prognosis of patients with superficial ECC treated with ESD.

In conclusion, patients with curatively resected ECC treated with ESD showed favorable long-term outcomes. SM1 cancer curatively resected by ESD did not show statistically significant differences in RFS rates compared to intramucosal cancer. Based on these results, we suggest that ESD could be considered the first treatment modality for superficial CRC. Since recurrence can be observed even in superficial CRCs completely removed by ESD, further large prospective studies are needed to predict the risk factors associated with recurrence.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to keeping privacy of patients but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Parkin M. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2013; 2.

  2. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66:683–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong SN. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of colorectal cancer. Intest Res. 2018;16:327–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim TJ, Kim ER, Hong SN, Kim YH, Chang DK. Current practices in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a survey of indications among Korean endoscopists. Intest Res. 2017;15:228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Hirano D, Tamaru Y, Ninomiya Y, et al. Clinical impact and characteristics of the narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:816–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta AK, Melton LJ 3rd, Petersen GM, Timmons LJ, Vege SS, Harmsen WS, et al. Changing trends in the incidence, stage, survival, and screen-detection of colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:150–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meester RGS, Mannalithara A, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Ladabaum U. Trends in incidence and stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in adults aged 40 through 49 years, 1975–2015. JAMA. 2019;321:1933–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong MA, Kang HW. Early-onset colorectal cancer. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2019;74:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019;394:1467–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dy GW, Gore JL, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C. Global burden of urologic cancers, 1990–2013. Eur Urol. 2017;71:437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Osterman E, Glimelius B. Recurrence risk after up-to-date colon cancer staging, surgery, and pathology: analysis of the entire Swedish population. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:1016–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Kobayashi N, et al. A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2013;45:718–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Nelson H, Wang E, Ko CY, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:2001–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morson BC, Whiteway JE, Jones EA, Macrae FA, Williams CB. Histopathology and prognosis of malignant colorectal polyps treated by endoscopic polypectomy. Gut. 1984;25:437–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujimori T, Kawamata H, Kashida H. Precancerous lesions of the colorectum. J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:587–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Saito Y, Uraoka T, Fukuzawa M, Fukunaga S, et al. Transcutaneous monitoring of partial pressure of carbon dioxide during endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasia with carbon dioxide insufflation: a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2231–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2020;32:219–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saito Y, Otake Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Yamada M, Haruyama S, et al. Indications for and technical aspects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver. 2013;7:263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi N, Takeuchi Y, Ohata K, Igarashi M, Yamada M, Kodashima S, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: prospective, multicenter, cohort trial. Dig Endosc. 2022;34(5):1042–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Freeman HJ. Long-term follow-up of patients with malignant pedunculated colon polyps after colonoscopic polypectomy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27:20–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada M, Saito Y, Takamaru H, Sasaki H, Yokota T, Matsuyama Y, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy. 2017;49:233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang DU, Park JC, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Kim KJ, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia with or without the hybrid technique. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22:2008–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen T, Qin WZ, Yao LQ, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-grade dysplasia and early-stage carcinoma in the colorectum. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018;38:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shigita K, Oka S, Tanaka S, Sumimoto K, Hirano D, Tamaru Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:546–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bosman FTWHOIAfRoC. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:343–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001;48:225–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Goto O, Ono S, Hirano K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy. 2010;42:723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith KJ, Jones PF, Burke DA, Treanor D, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Lymphatic vessel distribution in the mucosa and submucosa and potential implications for T1 colorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bartel MJ, Brahmbhatt BS, Wallace MB. Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection from the Western perspective. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:330–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Toh EW, Brown P, Morris E, Botterill I, Quirke P. Area of submucosal invasion and width of invasion predicts lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi YS, Kim WS, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, et al. Clinical outcomes of submucosal colorectal cancer diagnosed after endoscopic resection: a focus on the need for surgery. Intest Res. 2020;18:96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y, Iishi H, Kudo SE, Ikematsu H, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references



Members of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Su Jin Hong, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon. Jung-Won Jeon, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Bong Min Ko, M.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon. Weon Jin Ko, M.D., Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine. Sun Moon Kim. M.D. Ph.D., Division of Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University. Young Dae Kim, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea. Eun Ran Kim, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine. Kim Chan Gyoo, M.D. Ph.D., From the Center for Gastric Cancer and the Biometrics Research Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea. Gwang Ho Baik, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. Dong Hoon Baek, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Gastoenterology, Department of Internal medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine & Pusan National University Hospital. In Kyung Yoo, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Gastroenterology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam. Lee Kang Nyeong, M.D. Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Si Hyung Lee, M.D., Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine. Chul-Hyun Lim, M.D. Ph.D., Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. Hyun Joo Jang, M.D., Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine. Seong Woo Jeon, M.D., Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




JS, ERK and BMK made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted/revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. HJJ, DHB, D-HY, B-IL, KBC, JWC, S-AJ, SJH and KBM participated in the conception and design of the study, data analysis, and interpretation. ERK and BMK were responsible for the conception and design of the study; the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eun Ran Kim or Bong Min Ko.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consents to participate

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of our institution (Samsung Medical Center, 2015-06-074-002). This was a retrospective study and patient consent was not required for data collection or analysis, as approved by the aforementioned institutional review board. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, J., Kim, E.R., Jang, H.J. et al. Long-term prognosis of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer according to submucosal invasion: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 417 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: