Skip to main content
Download PDF

Gene variants of the SLC2A5 gene encoding GLUT5, the major fructose transporter, do not contribute to clinical presentation of acquired fructose malabsorption

BMC Gastroenterology volume 22, Article number: 167 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

While role of ALDOB-related gene variants for hereditary fructose intolerance is well established, contribution of gene variants for acquired fructose malabsorption (e.g. SLC2A5, GLUT5) is not well understood.

Methods

Patients referred to fructose breath test were further selected to identify those having acquired fructose malabsorption. Molecular analysis of genomic DNA included (I) exclusion of 3 main ALDOB gene variants causing hereditary fructose intolerance and (II) sequencing analysis of SLC2A5 gene comprising complete coding region, at least 20 bp of adjacent intronic regions and 700 bp of proximal promoter.

Results

Among 494 patients, 35 individuals with acquired fructose malabsorption were identified based on pathological fructose-breath test and normal lactose-breath test. Thirty four of them (97%) had negative tissue anti-transglutaminase and/or deamidated gliadin antibodies in their medical records. Molecular analysis of SLC2A5 gene of all 35 subjects identified 5 frequent and 5 singular gene variants mostly in noncoding regions (promoter and intron). Allele frequencies of gene variants were similar to those reported in public databases strongly implying that none of them was associated with acquired fructose malabsorption.

Conclusions

Gene variants of coding exons, adjacent intronic regions and proximal promoter region of SLC2A5 gene are unlikely to contribute to genetic predisposition of acquired fructose malabsorption.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Gastrointestinal symptoms are frequent causes for medical check-up in medical office and clinics as well. Pathophysiological mechanisms are numerous including infectious causes (viral, bacterial, parasitical), immunologically-related disorders (e.g. eosinophilic esophagitis, gastritis, coeliac disease, and chronic inflammatory bowel disease), intolerance towards nutrients or components (e.g. food-related allergies) and malabsorption syndromes of nutrients such as lactose [1] and fructose [2] as most common ones.

Malabsorption syndromes have rarely monogenic causes. Pathogenic mutations strongly affecting function of lactase [1, 3] or aldolase B [2, 4] as key enzymes for metabolizing lactose and fructose, respectively, are present in very few subjects. The overall majority of patients suffering from lactose- and fructose-related symptoms are caused multifactorially by hereditary, environmental, sociology-economic factors; in particular diet plays a major role. Lactose-related disorders had been widely studied for decades and have been comprehensively understood concerning its multi-factorial pathogenesis including genetic variants [5,6,7]. In contrast, fructose-related disorders are not well understood. Notably, fructose-associated disorders have sharply increased over the last 2 decades strongly associated with increasing demand of fructose consumption in a variety of food [8,9,10]. Incomplete intestinal absorption of fructose can lead to various symptoms in vulnerable subjects such as flatulence, diarrhea, bloating, nausea and pain [10,11,12]. Routinely, diagnosis of fructose malabsorption syndrome is mainly performed by hydrogen breath test after ingestion of defined amount of fructose [12]. Several studies demonstrated pathophysiological role of fructose transporters, in particular GLUT5, for the development of fructose-associated symptoms, although divergent results were reported. Mice experiments (either knockout or feeding models) highlighted a predominant role of slc2a5 gene (glut5) as major intestinal transporter for fructose and signaling molecule for the induction of down-stream acting genes encoding fructolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes [13,14,15]. Furthermore, slc2a5-mRNA was found to be regulated by age and presence of fructose in rat model [16, 17]. In human intestinal cell line models fructose was shown to positively regulate SLC2A5/GLUT5 expression by transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation [18, 19]. However, ex vivo studies of human samples did not show differences in SLC2A5-mRNA or GLUT5-protein content in intestinal biopsies from patients with fructose intolerance [20]. In addition to GLUT5 in intestine, the glucose-transporter GLUT2 contributes to the hepatic uptake of fructose since GLUT5 is weakly expressed in liver [21]. Very recently, several studies revealed potential regulatory role of GLUT5 for malignancy and proliferation of various tumor cells driven by high consumption of fructose as carbon source [22, 23]. Based on these recent observations, diagnostic and therapeutic potential of targeting this metabolic pathway has been started to be investigated [24,25,26,27]. The only study addressing the role of gene variants of SLC2A5/GLUT5 for the development of fructose malabsorption studied 8 patients suffering from isolated fructose malabsorption without finding any functionally relevant gene variant. Mutational analysis was performed by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and in one index case by Sanger sequencing [28]. In order to analyze potential role of SLC2A5 gene variants in a larger cohort, a genomic region comprising the complete coding region, adjacent introns and 700 bp of proximal promoter region of 35 subjects with acquired fructose malabsorption were comprehensively analyzed by Sanger sequencing.

Laboratory methods

Study design and patients

Study design was composed of retrospective and prospective parts (Fig. 1). Patients were included between 2013/01/01 and 2017/02/28. Patients referred to perform fructose-breath test in our center (n = 494) were screened for abnormal results suggesting malabsorption of fructose. Prior to the breath test, the 3 major gene variants of the ALDOB-gene causing hereditary fructose intolerance were excluded by PCR analysis. Among 167 patients with abnormal fructose breath test results, 86 presented normal results for lactose-breath test. Fifty-one patients from one gastroenterological center were selected allowing assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms by retrospective study of medical records. All 51 patients were invited to the study by phone and/or personal interview. Overall, 35 patients agreed participating to the study and provided signed informed consent. Study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the study and experimental protocols were approved by the Ethic Committee of the Land Sachsen-Anhalt (Vote No. 19/15).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study scheme

Full size image

Taken together, inclusion criteria were: (I) age > 18 years, (II) presence of symptoms implying upper gastrointestinal disorders (e.g. abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, bloating, flatulence), (III) lack of 3 major gene variants of the ALDOB-gene causing hereditary fructose intolerance, (IV) pathological fructose-breath test and (V) normal lactose-breath test; details in Fig. 1. Note that no information in the medical records was available concerning the potential use of fructose–free diet in the study cohort. Based on the “pathological result” of the fructose breath test, which was a mandatory prerequisite for the study, a malabsorption of fructose after an intake of 25 g was suspected. Whether the patient was recommended to use/try fructose-free diet and the compliance of this aspect was not followed up in this study.

Lactose-/fructose breath test

Breath tests were performed by routine methods. After 12 h fasting interval (not eating or drinking), patients were challenged with either 50 g lactose or 25 g fructose, dissolved in 200 ml water. Proportion of H2 in breath samples were analyzed every 30 min for a maximal period of 3 h. After identifying an increase of H2 samples were taken every 10–15 min. Generally, pathological findings for both breath tests were defined as increase of H2 content > 20 ppm compared to baseline (time point 0) and/or presence of gastrointestinal symptoms during test period. The presence of symptoms was assessed up to 8 h after test initiation by phone on the next day. For study purpose, pathological fructose-breath test was considered only if rise of hydrogen > 20 ppm was determined with and without presence of symptoms, while lactose breath test was also considered “positive” if only gastrointestinal symptoms appeared without increase of H2, since about 15% of all individuals are “H2-non-producer”.

Molecular analysis of ALDOB-related SNPs and SLC2A5 gene

Genomic DNA from blood samples were extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using QIACUBE and corresponding DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden Germany).

Three aldolase B (ALDOB)-single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using TaqMan® assays with a 7500™ real-time cycler, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) using Roche light cycler LCII. The 3 SNPs were: NM_000035.3(ALDOB):c.448G > C (p.Ala150Pro), rs1800546; c.524C > A (p.Ala175Asp), rs76917243 and c.1005C > G (p.Asn335Lys), rs78340951. Based on the absence of these SNPs, aldolase B deficiency could be excluded at > 90%.

Sequence analysis of SLC2A5 included untranslated exon 1, all coding exons 2–13 with at least 20 bp of corresponding intron–exon boundaries and 700 bp promoter region upstream of untranslated exon 1. PCR products were amplified using Qiagen Hot Start Plus polymerase and M13/M13reverse-tagged primers and conditions as outlined in Table 1. Standard PCR conditions were: 1 × 94 °C, 5 min; 42 × (94 °C, 20 s; 54 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 1 min) and 1 × 72 °C, 10 min.

Table 1 Primers used for amplification and sequencing
Full size table

Sequence analysis was performed by standard Sanger sequencing protocols using GeXP platform as described by manufacturer (AbSciex, Darmstadt, Germany). Purification of PCR amplicons and sequencing products were performed using magnetic beads Agencourt AMPure XP and CleanSEQ (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) as described by manufacturer. Sequence data were compared with reference sequences published at NCBI (NG_050918.1; NM_001328619.2) using CLC Workbench 8.23 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Data presentation

Categorical data are expressed as absolute numbers with percentages. Age is shown as a mean with standard deviation. Frequencies of identified gene variants were compared to public databases such as “thousand genome project”. Due to the low numbers of (I) gene variants identified and (II) number of patients analyzed in the study, data are presented descriptively only and were not statistically analyzed.

Results

Characterization of study group

As summarized in Table 2, the majority of patients was female (29/35) and the mean age was about 38 years. Retrospective evaluation of clinical records revealed abdominal pain and diarrhea as leading symptoms. Data concerning the duration of symptomatic disease was available for 40% of the study group. Furthermore it was shown that 34 out of the 35 patients analyzed had negative serology for coeliac disease; either anti-deamidated gliadin IgG/IgA (n = 30) or anti-tissue transglutaminase IgG/IgA (n = 4) (Table 2).

Table 2 Demographic and clinical data of study group. Multiple symptoms were possible. Note that data were retrospectively recorded from medical records of patients; no structured interview was performed
Full size table

The routine follow up of patients included in the majority of cases upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (n = 25/35) and/or colonoscopy (n = 23/35). No malignancy was identified in the study cohort. Oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy revealed diagnoses such as gastritis, gastric erosions, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hiatal hernia, bulbitis or no alterations (n = 7). Note that none of the patients demonstrated signs of intestinal atrophy that is associated with coeliac disease. Colonoscopy revealed normal findings (n = 12) and diagnosis such as hemorrhoids, chronic sigmoiditis, proctitis, diverticolitis.

Molecular analysis of SLC2A5

Sequence analysis of SLC2A5 was successfully performed for all 35 patients. In total, 10 gene variants were identified from those 5 were frequent and 5 were identified just once (Table 3). The 5 frequent gene variants are located in promoter and adjacent intronic regions and demonstrated frequencies between 10.0 and 47.1%. Comparison of identified allele frequencies between public databases and own data demonstrate similar ranges for frequent variants (Table 3). The 5 rare variants (including the missense variant) were identified in individual patients only. Among them the only exonic variant found was a synonymous gene variant leaving amino acid p.Leu278 unchanged. Based on the criteria of the guidelines of the “American College of Medical Genetics” (ACMG) none of the gene variants are considered having pathological relevance (Table 3).

Table 3 Allele frequencies of GLUT5 gene variants in 35 patients with acquired fructose intolerance (TGP: Thousand Genome Project; https://www.internationalgenome.org/data/; gnomAD: Genome Aggregation Database; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/)
Full size table

Discussion

Here, we demonstrated that gene variants of SLC2A5 gene encoding the fructose transporter GLUT5 are not generally involved in the pathogenesis of acquired fructose malabsorption. Based on the number of subjects studied (n = 35) we cannot exclude a rare role of such gene variants, but the portion of patients suffering from “pathogenic GLUT5 variants” is likely to be < 3–5%.

A major strength of the study is the clinically based definition of the study cohort prior to molecular analysis. Related gastrointestinal disorders such as hereditary lactose-intolerance and acquired lactose malabsorption, both leading to pathological lactose breath test, were excluded. Hereditary ALDOB deficiency was practically ruled out by analyzing the 3 major mutations of ALDOB leading to this disease. Coeliac disease, also considered as chimera among gastrointestinal diseases, was kept out of the study group by 2 approaches. First, since secondary lactose malabsorption is a well-known leading symptom for coeliac disease, these patients were excluded by abnormal lactose breath test. Second, for 34 out of the 35 individuals, corresponding serological parameters (anti-tissue anti-transglutaminase or anti-deamidated gliadin antibodies) were found to be negative.

The symptoms reported by our patients are rather unspecific and in line with those reported in similar studies with patients (I) suffering from fructose malabsorption tested by breath test [29,30,31], or (II) classified as having irritable bowel disease (IBS) [32, 33]. However it is notable that symptoms in our studies were assessed retrospectively only by analyzing patients’ medical records, and no structured interview or assessment of questionnaire in context to e.g. IBS-related Rome criteria [34] was performed.

In summary, the 35 subjects included in the molecular analysis of the SLC2A5 gene presented (I) clinically relevant symptoms that are consistent with acquired fructose-malabsorption, (II) demonstrated abnormal fructose-induced breath test and (III) relevant other related diagnoses (e.g. coeliac disease, hereditary fructose intolerance) were basically excluded. Taken together, we are confident that overall the great majority of these 35 subjects are patients suffering from acquired fructose malabsorption. It has been shown that the individual ability of metabolizing fructose for subjects without any side effects differs widely from 5–50 g (reviewed in [21]) supporting the multi-factorial etiology of acquired fructose malabsorption.

The aim of the study, molecular analysis of SLC2A5 gene concerning gene variants associated with fructose malabsorption, was based on other studies showing the role of SNPs/mutations affecting the uptake/metabolism of related sugars. Variants including partial deficiency of sucrose-isomaltase were shown to be associated with IBS [35]. Analysis of UK biobank data revealed that gene variants in human ketohexokinase gene are associated with loss of function and resulting in the rare benign condition of fructosuria [36]. In vitro mutation analysis in rats between GLUT5 and its closest related transporter (GLUT7) revealed that single amino acids (e.g. p.Gln166Glu) are responsible for the specific transport of fructose, and mutation of this residue to p.166Glu results in the uptake of glucose, whereas other variants and chimera between GLUT5 and GLUT7 demonstrated strong reduction or even complete lack of fructose uptake [15].

The fact that the allele frequencies of the 10 gene variants between ours and those reported in database were very similar strongly implies that none of these variants have a relevant role for the clinical manifestation of acquired fructose malabsorption. Notably, 5 of the 10 gene variants were singular findings that do not allow any general conclusion due to study size. But taken into account the very low frequencies reported in databases, the potential relevance for the very frequent fructose-absorption syndrome seems to be very limited. Since the study was considered as pilot study to identify potential pathogenic gene variants of the SLC2A5 gene in relation to acquired fructose malabsorption, we did not include an own control group in the study design and decided instead to initially compare identified frequencies of gene variants with public databases.

While this study demonstrate that SLC2A5-related gene variants do not play a relevant role in the pathogenesis of acquired fructose malabsorption, other pathogenic factors have been recently identified to be associated with this disorder. Trelis and co-workers identified a frequent association of the disease with the infection of parasites, in particular Giardia intestinalis [37]. Several animal studies identified specific changes in the gut microbiome in context to genetic host factors [38] and the intake of fructose [38, 39] showing that Akkermansia spec. seems to play an important role in the prevention fructose-induced metabolic dysregulation. Over-expression of slc2a5 in slc2a5/glut5-knock out mice let to profound increase of fructose utilization and subsequent higher levels of Clostridium and Enterococcus spec. [40]. Overall most related studies demonstrate that higher intestinal luminal levels of fructose caused by changes in fructose consumption or absorption will likely affect bacterial load and composition of the microbiome (reviewed in [41]).

In humans, several studies highlighted the role of the transcription factor ChREBP encoded by the MLXIPL gene for the predisposition concerning fructose intolerance malabsorption [21, 42] and diarrhea—predominant IBS patients with impaired intestinal fructose transport [43]. The association between ChREBP and fructose malabsorption was further supported by animal models [44, 45]. Nuclear receptor LXR (lxralpha, NR1H3) is another transcriptional regulator of GLUT5 expression identified in mice and human that is thought to be a potential pharmaceutical target for selective modulation of GLUT5 expression in context to cancer and metabolic disease [46]. Notably, authors identified a functional LXR responsive element in the human SLC2A5 promoter region located at position-385 based on transcriptional start site, but none of our 35 patients showed a variation at this position.

Overall, these different findings strengthen the hypothesis that fructose-related malabsorption syndrome associated with different pathological conditions has multi-factorial etiology. Different transcriptional regulatory patterns affecting the SLC2A5 gene expression contribute to the pathology, whereas gene variants of SLC2A5 including the promoter region, which was the focus of this study, do not play a relevant role.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Fassio F, Facioni MS, Guagnini F. Lactose maldigestion, malabsorption, and intolerance: a comprehensive review with a focus on current management and future perspectives. Nutrients. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111599.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson PR, Newnham E, Barrett JS, et al. Review article: fructose malabsorption and the bigger picture. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(4):349–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wanes D, Husein DM, Naim HY. Congenital lactase deficiency: mutations, functional and biochemical implications, and future perspectives. Nutrients. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker P II, Ayres L, Gaughan S, et al. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., editors. Hereditary fructose intolerance. GeneReviews®. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2020.

  5. Lukito W, Malik SG, Surono IS, et al. From “lactose intolerance” to “lactose nutrition.” Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2015;24(Suppl 1):S1-8. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.2015.24.s1.01.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ingram CJ, Mulcare CA, Itan Y, et al. Lactose digestion and the evolutionary genetics of lactase persistence. Hum Genet. 2009;124(6):579–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-008-0593-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Järvelä IE. Molecular genetics of adult-type hypolactasia. Ann Med. 2005;37(3):179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones HF, Butler RN, Brooks DA. Intestinal fructose transport and malabsorption in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300(2):G202–6. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00457.2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebert K, Witt H. Fructose malabsorption. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2016;3(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-016-0035-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hammer HF, Hammer J. Diarrhea caused by carbohydrate malabsorption. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2012;41(3):611–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2012.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel C, Douard V, Yu S, Gao N, et al. Transport, metabolism, and endosomal trafficking-dependent regulation of intestinal fructose absorption. FASEB J. 2015;29(9):4046–58. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.15-272195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Amieva-Balmori M, Coss-Adame E, Rao NS, et al. Diagnostic utility of carbohydrate breath tests for SIBO, fructose, and lactose intolerance. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65(5):1405–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05889-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel C, Douard V, Yu S, et al. Fructose-induced increases in expression of intestinal fructolytic and gluconeogenic genes are regulated by GLUT5 and KHK. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015;309(5):R499-509. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00128.2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barone S, Fussell SL, Singh AK, et al. Slc2a5 (Glut5) is essential for the absorption of fructose in the intestine and generation of fructose-induced hypertension. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(8):5056–66. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M808128200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebert K, Ewers M, Bisha I, et al. Identification of essential amino acids for glucose transporter 5 (GLUT5)-mediated fructose transport. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(6):2115–24. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA117.001442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shu R, David ES, Ferraris RP. Dietary fructose enhances intestinal fructose transport and GLUT5 expression in weaning rats. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(3 Pt 1):G446–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Suzuki T, Douard V, Mochizuki K, et al. Diet-induced epigenetic regulation in vivo of the intestinal fructose transporter Glut5 during development of rat small intestine. Biochem J. 2011;435(1):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20101987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gouyon F, Onesto C, Dalet V, et al. Fructose modulates GLUT5 mRNA stability in differentiated Caco-2 cells: role of cAMP-signalling pathway and PABP (polyadenylated-binding protein)-interacting protein (Paip) 2. Biochem J. 2003;375(Pt 1):167–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesonero J, Matosin M, Cambier D, et al. Sugar-dependent expression of the fructose transporter GLUT5 in Caco-2 cells. Biochem J. 1995;312(Pt 3):757–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilder-Smith CH, Li X, Ho SS, et al. Fructose transporters GLUT5 and GLUT2 expression in adult patients with fructose intolerance. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2014;2(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640613505279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hannou SA, Haslam DE, McKeown NM, et al. Fructose metabolism and metabolic disease. J Clin Investig. 2018;128(2):545–55. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI96702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Su C, Li H, Gao W. GLUT5 increases fructose utilization and promotes tumor progression in glioma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;500(2):462–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin X, Liang Y, Liu D, et al. An essential role for GLUT5-mediated fructose utilization in exacerbating the malignancy of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2019;35(5):471–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-019-09478-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin C, Gong X, Shang Y. GLUT5 increases fructose utilization in ovarian cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:5425–36. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S205522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan X, Liu H, Liu M, et al. Increased utilization of fructose has a positive effect on the development of breast cancer. PeerJ. 2017;5: e3804. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kannan S, Begoyan VV, Fedie JR, et al. Metabolism-driven high-throughput cancer identification with GLUT5-specific molecular probes. Biosensors (Basel). 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8020039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tripp J, Essl C, Iancu CV, et al. Establishing a yeast-based screening system for discovery of human GLUT5 inhibitors and activators. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06262-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasserman D, Hoekstra JH, Tolia V, et al. Molecular analysis of the fructose transporter gene (GLUT5) in isolated fructose malabsorption. J Clin Investig. 1996;98(10):2398–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Posovszky C, Roesler V, Becker S, Warschburger P, et al. Roles of lactose and fructose malabsorption and dietary outcomes in children presenting with chronic abdominal pain. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):3063. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11123063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mehta M, Beg M. Fructose intolerance: cause or cure of chronic functional constipation. Glob Pediatr Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X18761460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammer V, Hammer K, Memaran N, et al. Relationship between abdominal symptoms and fructose ingestion in children with chronic abdominal pain. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(5):1270–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4997-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nybacka S, Störsrud S, Lindqvist HM, et al. Habitual FODMAP intake in relation to symptom severity and pattern in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrients. 2020;13(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13010027.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jung KW, Seo M, Cho YH, et al. Prevalence of fructose malabsorption in patients with irritable bowel syndrome after excluding small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24(2):307–16. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm17044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lacy BE, Patel NK. Rome criteria and a diagnostic approach to irritable bowel syndrome. J Med. 2017;6(11):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm6110099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ohlsson B. Theories behind the effect of starch- and sucrose-reduced diets on gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome (review). Mol Med Rep. 2021;24(4):732. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.12372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnston JA, Nelson DR, Bhatnagar P, et al. Prevalence and cardiometabolic correlates of ketohexokinase gene variants among UK Biobank participants. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2): e0247683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Trelis M, Taroncher-Ferrer S, Gozalbo M, et al. Giardia intestinalis and fructose malabsorption: a frequent association. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122973.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahn IS, Lang JM, Olson CA, et al. Host genetic background and gut microbiota contribute to differential metabolic responses to fructose consumption in mice. J Nutr. 2020;150(10):2716–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Song M, Li X, Zhang X, et al. Dietary copper-fructose interactions alter gut microbial activity in male rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018;314(1):G119–30. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00378.2016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmitt CC, Aranias T, Viel T, et al. Intestinal invalidation of the glucose transporter GLUT2 delays tissue distribution of glucose and reveals an unexpected role in gut homeostasis. Mol Metab. 2016;6(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2016.10.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferraris RP, Choe JY, Patel CR. Intestinal absorption of fructose. Annu Rev Nutr. 2018;38:41–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-082117-051707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Agius L, Chachra SS, Ford BE. The protective role of the carbohydrate response element binding protein in the liver: the metabolite perspective. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11: 594041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.594041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Oh AR, Sohn S, Lee J, et al. ChREBP deficiency leads to diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Metabolism. 2018;85:286–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.04.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kato T, Iizuka K, Takao K, et al. ChREBP-knockout mice show sucrose intolerance and fructose malabsorption. Nutrients. 2018;10(3):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim M, Astapova II, Flier SN, et al. Intestinal, but not hepatic, ChREBP is required for fructose tolerance. JCI Insight. 2017;2(24): e96703. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.96703.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Zwarts I, van Zutphen T, Kruit JK, et al. Identification of the fructose transporter GLUT5 (SLC2A5) as a novel target of nuclear receptor LXR. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45803-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors like to thank patients for their contributions and other colleagues of the Laboratory “Prof. Schenk/Dr. Ansorge & Colleagues” not listed as authors.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Genetics, Medical Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Genetics “Prof. Schenk/Dr. Ansorge and Colleagues”, Schwiesaustr. 11, 39124, Magdeburg, Germany

    Irina Taneva, Dorothee Grumann, Elina Taneva, Thomas Ansorge & Thomas Wex

  2. Medical Office Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Olvenstedter Str. 11, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany

    Dietmar Schmidt

  3. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-Von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany

    Ulrike von Arnim & Thomas Wex

Authors
  1. Irina Taneva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dorothee Grumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dietmar Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elina Taneva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulrike von Arnim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas Ansorge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Wex
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I.T. included patients, acquired data, analyzed primary data, and was involved in writing of the manuscript. D.G. included patients, acquired data, analyzed primary data, and was involved in writing of the manuscript. D.S. included patients and provided retrospective data of study cohort. E.T. was involved in providing funding, planning of study, providing data of breath tests. U.v.A. was involved in study design, assessment of serological data. T.A. was involved in providing funding, planning of study, providing data of breath tests. T.W. was involved in study design, inclusion of patients, primary data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Wex.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study scheme and experimental protocols were approved by the Ethic Committee of the Land Sachsen-Anhalt (Vote No. 19/15). The study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All patients who participated in the study provided signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taneva, I., Grumann, D., Schmidt, D. et al. Gene variants of the SLC2A5 gene encoding GLUT5, the major fructose transporter, do not contribute to clinical presentation of acquired fructose malabsorption. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02244-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02244-7

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us