Skip to main content

Granulomatous colitis in a patient with metastatic melanoma under immunotherapy: a case report and literature review



Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have changed the way advanced malignancies are currently confronted, improving cancer patients’ outcomes but also generating distinct immune-related (ir) adverse events. ICPIs-induced colitis is a common complication showing different clinical and histological manifestations. In the literature review, 14 cases with ICPIs related colon granulomas have been reported in 5 studies with either limited or unavailable information regarding histology. Granulomatous reactions can be mistakenly perceived as disease recurrence or progression. Better understanding and identification of this infrequent histological display can help to avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old female patient with metastatic melanoma was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of nausea, persistent diarrhea and shivering fever under consecutive treatments with ICPIs, initially pembrolizumab and subsequently ipilimumab. Sigmoidoscopy was performed revealing mucosal edema, hyperemia and erosions of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Histological evaluation of sigmoid colon mucosa biopsies revealed an unusual colitis pattern characterized by multiple intracryptal granulomas attributed to ICPIs therapy. Steroids were administered and the patient recovered. ICPIs treatment was discontinued. The patient was subsequently treated with chemotherapy but follow up radiology showed disease progression. A re-challenge with another ICPI regimen was decided and the patient is currently under immunotherapy with stable disease regarding melanoma status and without any sign of colitis recurrence.


The present report provides detailed histological description of a distinctive ICPIs-induced granulomatous colitis and highlights the need for awareness of the distinct adverse events and reaction patterns in the context of immunotherapy.

Peer Review reports


Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have rapidly evolved into a breakthrough oncological treatment, which changed the natural course of many different cancers and improved patients’ survival. Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) was the first agent approved for the treatment of late-stage melanoma. Subsequently two other ICPIs acting against PD1 receptor (programmed death receptor 1), pembrolizumab and nivolumab, received approval for advanced melanoma. Currently, an anti-PD1 regimen is the preferred immunotherapy with ipilimumab being administrated in combination with nivolumab or as second-line option [1].

Despite their impressive anticancer effects, ICPIs are also responsible for some serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affecting multiple organs such as skin, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, liver, lungs, lymph nodes, nervous and endocrine systems. Among irAEs, colitis is a very common immune-mediated complication requiring immediate clinical and histological evaluation, since severe cases can be life-threatening [2]. GI toxicity is more frequently reported in anti-CTLA4 administration, presenting with diarrhea of any grade in 27–54% of the patients [3]. The diagnosis of immune-related (ir) colitis is challenging as clinical manifestation is often atypical and non-specific mimicking other pathologic conditions such as intestinal bacterial infection or medication-associated diarrhea. The comprehensive approach of ir-colitis encompasses endoscopic and histological evaluation of colon mucosa. Typical colonoscopy findings are erythema, erosions, loss of vascular pattern and ulcerations, while in few cases mucosa may appear totally normal [3]. Histology reveals different patterns of injury, while granulomas have rarely been mentioned.

Herein, we describe a case of a female patient with metastatic melanoma under consecutive treatments with ICPIs, who developed a distinctive granulomatous colitis manifested by multiple intracryptal granulomas attributed to ICPIs therapy. A review of all cases with ICPIs related colon granulomas reported in the literature was also performed.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old Caucasian female patient with no past medical history was diagnosed in 2014 with cutaneous melanoma on her right heel, Breslow thickness 8.5 mm, Clark level V, mitotic figures 10/mm2. Following primary diagnosis, she underwent wide local excision with sentinel lymph node dissection that was negative for residual disease. She subsequently received adjuvant high dose interferon (5 days/week for 4 weeks), according to approved guidelines at the time. Three years later, whole body computerized tomography (CT) scanning revealed a lesion of 45 mm in the lower lobe of the left lung. Patient underwent lobectomy and histology confirmed metastatic melanoma, BRAF wild type on molecular analysis. At that point, no adjuvant treatment was provided. A year later, CT restaging revealed several pulmonary nodules scattered on both lungs, enlarged lymph nodes in the left hilum and gastroesophageal area. Given melanoma relapse, the patient received pembrolizumab intravenously (iv), 200 mg flat dose every 3 weeks, without any immune-related complications except of a mild elevation of transaminases. Three months post pembrolizumab initiation, lesions and lymphadenopathy were increased in size and therefore anti-PD1 was discontinued. The patient was scheduled to receive 4 cycles of iv ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, as second-line treatment. Approximately 2 weeks after the second administration of ipilimumab, she complained of nausea, persistent diarrhea and shivering fever and was admitted to our clinic for further evaluation and management. On physical examination, fever reached 38 °C and her abdomen was distended with hyperactive bowel sounds. The white blood cell count was 6.48 × 109/L with 71.3% neutrophils; C-reactive protein (135 mg/L, normal value < 5 mg/L) and lactate dehydrogenase (379U/L, normal range: 135–215 U/L) were increased while serum albumin was low (27.5 g/L, normal range: 35–50); transaminases and cholestatic enzymes were elevated (AST: 56 U/L, ALT: 45 U/L, GGT: 307 U/L, ALP: 170 U/L) with normal bilirubin (0.74 mg/dl, normal range: 0.3–1.2 mg/dl). Thyroid-stimulating hormone was increased (17.83 mU/L, normal range: 0.27–4.5 mU/L)] giving the suspicion for immune-mediated thyroiditis with the rest of serum endocrine parameters being normal [adrenocorticotropic hormone = 35 pg/ml (normal range: 10–65 pg/ml) and cortisol = 221.9 mmol/L (normal range: 173.6–505 mmol/L)]. Approaching her as an immunocompromised case, wide-range antibiotics were empirically delivered without resolution of her symptoms. Stool cultures for bacteria, ova and parasites, Clostridium difficile toxins (A and B), as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) were all negative. Abdominal CT scan was negative for visceral metastasis showing thickening of the large bowel wall, a finding supportive of colonic inflammation. The patient underwent sigmoidoscopy that revealed mucosal edema, hyperemia and erosions of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Representative biopsies were obtained for histological evaluation.

Histological findings

Histological examination revealed multiple small, non-necrotizing epithelioid granulomas within the crypts with partial or complete destruction of the crypt epithelium and derangement but not total disruption of the basement membrane, depicted in Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) histochemical stain. Some intracryptal granulomas were accompanied by rupture of the crypt wall and pericryptal expansion (Fig. 1a–e). Active inflammation was also present characterized by moderate lamina propria lymphoplasmacytic infiltrations, focal cryptitis and rare crypt abscesses. Basal plasmacytosis, intraepithelial lymphocytes or crypt architectural distortions were not apparent while neutrophils and eosinophils were scarce. Few apoptotic bodies were occasionally seen at the crypt base. Histochemical PAS and Ziehl–Neelsen stains were negative for fungi and acid-fast bacteria respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Intracryptal granulomas a, b Total and partial crypt wall destruction (H/EX100). c, d Partial destruction of the crypt epithelium and derangement but not total disruption of the basement membrane (H/EX200, PASX200). e Partial crypt wall destruction including epithelial lining and basement membrane (PASX200). f Attenuation of the pericryptal myofibroblasts (SMAX200)

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4 μm-thick sections using Dako Envision Flex system (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The following antibodies were applied: CD20 (Dako, clone L26, mouse monoclonal, 1:700 dilution, Glostrup, Denmark), CD3 (Dako, rabbit polyclonal, 1:50 dilution), CD4 (Dako, clone 4B12, mouse monoclonal, 1:50), CD8 (Dako, clone C8/144B, mouse monoclonal, 1:200 dilution) and SMA (Dako, clone 1A4, mouse monoclonal, 1:800 dilution). Based on the above immunostains, the vast majority of lymphocytes were T cells (CD3 +) predominately CD4+. SMA highlighted the attenuation of the pericryptal myofibroblasts (Fig. 1f).

In view of the patient’s clinical history, the lesion was reported as granulomatous colitis probably induced by ipilimumab.

Management after ir-colitis

Anti-CTLA4 was discontinued and iv prednisone at a dose of 75 mg/d was initiated with immediate clinical improvement of the diarrheic syndrome. The patient was subsequently treated with chemotherapy with no reported serious adverse events till September 2019, when radiology showed new disease progression. A re-challenge with another anti-PD1 agent, namely nivolumab, was decided, and currently the patient is under immunotherapy with stable disease regarding melanoma status and without any sign of colitis recurrence.

Literature review

Running through the literature on PubMed and using the following terms (CTLA4, PD1/PD-L1, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, immune-related adverse events, granulomatous reactions, granulomatous colitis and colon granulomas), we ended up to 5 studies that described in total 14 cases with immunotherapy related colon granulomas. A flow diagram of the performed systematic review is illustrated in Fig. 2. In these cases, melanoma was commonly the underlying cancer treated with ICPIs, while the median time to colitis onset exceeded 30 days with one exception of ir-colitis presentation 27 days after the initiation of a combination immunotherapy.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow diagram of the performed systematic review

Of the 14 reported cases of colitis with granuloma formation, 1 was associated with PD1 inhibitor [4], 2 with nivolumab/ipilimumab combination [5], 3 with an anti-PD1 regimen without being clearly mentioned if the patients were receiving also ipilimumab [6], and 5 with anti-CTLA4 treatment [5, 7]. For the remaining 3 cases it is not clear whether patients received ipilimumab alone or in combination with melanoma peptide vaccines to enhance host’s immunization [8], therefore granuloma formation could be related to ipilimumab, to vaccination or both. Table 1 summarizes the data of the studies reporting colon granulomas in patients under ICPIs.

Table 1 Summary of studies reporting colon granulomas in patients under ICPIs

Apart from colon, granulomatous/sarcoid-like reactions (G/SLR) have also been described in different organs of cancer patients treated with ICPIs. Table 2 presents a synopsis of published series with 3 or more patients under immunotherapy reporting at least one case of ICPIs-associated G/SLR in organs other than GI tract [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Lungs, lymph nodes and skin were the main tissues with granuloma formation, while melanoma was the main underlying malignancy.

Table 2 Cases with ICPIs-associated granulomatous/sarcoid-like reactions in organs other than GI tract

Discussion and conclusions

ICPIs have transformed the therapeutic strategy for many malignancies and physicians have to face various aspects of their widespread oncological implication in everyday clinical practice. Among them, ir-toxicity is of major importance since it requires immediate recognition and treatment. In case of ir-colitis, endoscopy with biopsy collection is the initial fundamental step in the diagnostic work-up followed by a careful histological evaluation.

Histological features of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1-induced colitis overlap significantly. According to a recent review [22] four distinct histological patterns can be attributed to ipilimumab-induced colitis: active colitis, active colitis with prominent epithelial apoptosis, chronic active colitis mimicking idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and lymphocytic colitis. Lamina propria infiltration by lymphocytes, plasma cells and a varying number of neutrophils and eosinophils is constantly present. Cryptitis and crypt micro-abscesses are also common findings. Increased epithelial apoptotic bodies at the base of the crypts is characteristic feature of the “active colitis with prominent epithelial apoptosis”. An IBD-like pattern with signs of chronicity such as basal plasmacytosis, significant crypt architectural distortion and Paneth cell metaplasia in the distal colon seems to evolve if ipilimumab-colitis is left untreated, immunosuppressive treatment proves to be ineffective or after recurrent episodes of colitis. A histological subtype mimicking lymphocytic colitis with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, surface epithelial injury and minimal neutrophilic infiltration has also been described [22, 23]. In a previous study from our department [24] ipilimumab-related inflammation always involved the sigmoid colon showing pathologic features mostly resembling to IBD. Anti-PD1-associated colitis usually appears as active colitis showing cryptitis and neutrophilic crypt abscesses accompanied by increased apoptosis and crypt atrophy/dropout. Another histological pattern is “lymphocytic colitis” similar to the one observed in ipilimumab-related injury, while recurrent anti-PD1 colitis can result in IBD-like chronic active colitis [23, 25]. Few cases of ICPIs-induced collagenous colitis have also been reported [26,27,28]. Concerning lymphocytic subsets, T cell population prevails in ICPIs-associated colitis. CD8 + T-cells predominate in the lamina propria and epithelium of anti-PD1 related colitis, whereas CD4 + T-cells are more numerous in anti-CTLA4-induced colitis [24, 29, 30]. Our case does not fulfill the histological features of the above-mentioned colitis subtypes and seems to represent a distinctive colitis pattern determined by intracryptal granulomas.

In most of literature cases showing granuloma formation after immunotherapy, histological details are not available. Geukes Foppen et al. [5] report that granulomas were found mainly in the lamina propria of colon mucosa and rarely in the submucosa, while in another study [6] granulomas were seen in a minority of the examined biopsies in relation to ruptured crypts and were considered secondary to crypt damage. Our case is differentiated by the presence of multiple, minute, epithelioid granulomas, the majority confined within the crypt limits, as shown by the preservation of the basement membrane and subepithelial myofibroblasts. These findings favor intracryptal formation as initial reaction followed by disruption of the crypt wall. Considering that granulomas were the prevailing finding, the term granulomatous colitis is justified.

To support the diagnosis of ICPIs-induced colitis, we excluded a history of inflammatory bowel disease as well as infections that can be manifested as granulomatous colitis. The onset of diarrhea after ICPIs exposure and the resolution of symptoms soon after steroid administration were in favor of our diagnosis. Given the PD1 inhibition with pembrolizumab before ipilimumab administration, we cannot be sure whether the clinical syndrome and the granulomatous inflammation was an anti-CTLA4 or an anti-PD1 side effect or a consequence of their sequencing. However, there are some data supporting the causality of ipilimumab. The onset of GI symptoms following ipilimumab administration (e.g. two weeks after the second dose and 5 after its initiation) is in agreement with the time-point of irAE presentation according to published evidence, which suggest that ir-colitis may occur at any time during 1–10 infusions of anti-CTLA4 [3]. Moreover, no colitis recurrence was observed for more than 4 months after re-induction of anti-PD1 treatment and finally the predominance of CD4 + T lymphocytes also favor the implication of anti-CTLA4  agent.

As far as other parts of GI tract are concerned, 2 cases of anti-CTLA4-related granulomatous gastritis and 1 of duodenitis have been reported, unaccompanied by histological description [7]. Although rare in GI, granulomatous/sarcoid-like reaction (G/SLR) associated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA4 antibodies is an already recognized immunotherapy-induced toxicity that can affect different organs. Better understanding and identification of this infrequent histological display can help to avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement, since G/SLR can be erroneously perceived as disease recurrence or progression [31]. It has also been suggested that the formation of granulomas itself may not represent an irAE but rather a part of antitumor immune response with self-limited potential not requiring steroid treatment [32, 33].

The exact mechanism of granulomas formation in sarcoidosis, Crohn’s disease and similar granulomatous reactions is currently unknown. There are indications of a T cell-mediated phenomenon involving T-helper (Th) and T-regulatory (Tregs) cells. Uncontrolled activity of Th1 cells with overproduction of cytokines together with already present macrophages seem to play a crucial role in the development of granulomas [34]. Two recently published studies identified significant up-regulation of mucosal expression of TGF-α and IFN-γ in anti-CTLA4-induced colitis supporting the enrollment of IFN-γ in pathogenesis [24, 30]. Furthermore, decreased CTLA4 expression on Tregs has been reported in patients with sarcoidosis permitting incrimination of CTLA4 and Tregs function defects in granuloma formation in autoinflammatory diseases [35]. Based on the latter assumption, the suppression of Tregs by anti-CTLA4 could be pathogenetically involved in granulomatous reaction. One should not overlook the fact that in our case granulomas displayed most often intracryptal topography favoring infectious or non-infectious particles of the luminal content as foreign triggering factors. It could also be speculated that crypt epithelial lesions may also present an initial immune-mediated damage aggravated by the following granulomatous reaction.

This report presents a rare case of ICPIs-induced granulomatous colitis and highlights the need for awareness of the distinct adverse events and reaction patterns in the context of immunotherapy, in order to avoid misdiagnosis. It is crucial for the medical community not only to be vigilant for the reported iRAEs and their management, but also for novel reactions mediated by these revolutionary drugs.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study are included in this paper and shall be available from the corresponding author upon request.



Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors




Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte—associated Antigen 4


Programmed—death receptor 1


Programmed death ligand 1


Immune—related adverse events




Computerized tomography


V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B




Polymerase chain reaction




Periodic acid—Schiff


Cluster of differentiation


Smooth muscle actin


Granulomatous/sarcoid—like reactions


Inflammatory bowel diseases


T helper


T regulatory


Transforming growth factor alpha


Interferon gamma


  1. Michielin O, van Akkooi ACJ, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Keilholz U. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-updagger. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1884–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, Bingham CO 3rd, Brogdon C, Dadu R, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haanen J, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):119–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyahara K, Noda T, Ito Y, Hidaka H, Fujimoto S, Takedomi H, et al. An investigation of nine patients with gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Digestion. 2020;101(1):60–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geukes Foppen MH, Rozeman EA, van Wilpe S, Postma C, Snaebjornsson P, van Thienen JV, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition-related colitis: symptoms, endoscopic features, histology and response to management. ESMO Open. 2018;3(1):e000278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez RS, Salaria SN, Bohannon CD, Huber AR, Feely MM, Shi C. PD-1 inhibitor gastroenterocolitis: case series and appraisal of “immunomodulatory gastroenterocolitis.” Histopathology. 2017;70(4):558–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marthey L, Mateus C, Mussini C, Nachury M, Nancey S, Grange F, et al. Cancer immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies induces an inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10(4):395–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck KE, Blansfield JA, Tran KQ, Feldman AL, Hughes MS, Royal RE, et al. Enterocolitis in patients with cancer after antibody blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(15):2283–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johncilla M, Misdraji J, Pratt DS, Agoston AT, Lauwers GY, Srivastava A, et al. Ipilimumab-associated hepatitis: clinicopathologic characterization in a series of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(8):1075–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Belliere J, Meyer N, Mazieres J, Ollier S, Boulinguez S, Delas A, et al. Acute interstitial nephritis related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(12):1457–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Firwana B, Ravilla R, Raval M, Hutchins L, Mahmoud F. Sarcoidosis-like syndrome and lymphadenopathy due to checkpoint inhibitors. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017;23(8):620–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cousin S, Toulmonde M, Kind M, Cazeau AL, Bechade D, Coindre JM, et al. Pulmonary sarcoidosis induced by the anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(6):1178–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tetzlaff MT, Nelson KC, Diab A, Staerkel GA, Nagarajan P, Torres-Cabala CA, et al. Granulomatous/sarcoid-like lesions associated with checkpoint inhibitors: a marker of therapy response in a subset of melanoma patients. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, Champiat S, Mateus C, Lambotte O, et al. Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hepatol. 2018;68(6):1181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faviez G, Bousquet E, Rabeau A, Rouquette I, Collot S, Goumarre C, et al. Sarcoid-like granulomatosis in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoints inhibitors. Rev Mal Respir. 2018;35(9):963–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubicki SL, Welborn ME, Garg N, Aung PP, Patel AB. Granulomatous dermatitis associated with ipilimumab therapy (ipilimumab associated granulomatous dermatitis). J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45(8):636–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang LL, Patel G, Chiesa-Fuxench ZC, McGettigan S, Schuchter L, Mitchell TC, et al. Timing of onset of adverse cutaneous reactions associated with programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(9):1057–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Larsen BT, Chae JM, Dixit AS, Hartman TE, Peikert T, Roden AC. Clinical and histopathologic features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43(10):1331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez EF, Lipson E, Suresh K, Cappelli LC, Monaco SE, Maleki Z. Immune checkpoint blocker-related sarcoid-like granulomatous inflammation: a rare adverse event detected in lymph node aspiration cytology of patients treated for advanced malignant melanoma. Hum Pathol. 2019;91:69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zen Y, Chen YY, Jeng YM, Tsai HW, Yeh MM. Immune-related adverse reactions in the hepatobiliary system: second-generation check-point inhibitors highlight diverse histological changes. Histopathology. 2020;76(3):470–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chorti E, Kanaki T, Zimmer L, Hadaschik E, Ugurel S, Gratsias E, et al. Drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction in adjuvant immunotherapy: Increased rate and mimicker of metastasis. Eur J Cancer. 2020;131:18–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Trac B, Chen HH, Muhlbauer A, Ma Y, Duan X, Ding X. IpiColitis: ipilimumab-induced colitis with a wide spectrum of histological features. Am J Digest Dis. 2018;5(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karamchandani DM, Chetty R. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal and hepatic injury: pathologists’ perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(8):665–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bamias G, Delladetsima I, Perdiki M, Siakavellas SI, Goukos D, Papatheodoridis GV, et al. Immunological characteristics of colitis associated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy. Cancer Invest. 2017;35(7):443–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen JH, Pezhouh MK, Lauwers GY, Masia R. Histopathologic features of colitis due to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(5):643–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes MS, Molina GE, Chen ST, Zheng H, Deshpande V, Fadden R, et al. Budesonide treatment for microscopic colitis from immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou W, Huang Y, Lai J, Lu J, Feely M, Liu X. Anti-inflammatory biologics and anti-tumoral immune therapies-associated colitis: a focused review of literature. Gastroenterol Res. 2018;11(3):174–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baroudjian B, Lourenco N, Pages C, Chami I, Maillet M, Bertheau P, et al. Anti-PD1-induced collagenous colitis in a melanoma patient. Melanoma Res. 2016;26(3):308–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Som A, Mandaliya R, Alsaadi D, Farshidpour M, Charabaty A, Malhotra N, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(4):405–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Coutzac C, Adam J, Soularue E, Collins M, Racine A, Mussini C, et al. Colon immune-related adverse events: anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade induce distinct immunopathological entities. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11(10):1238–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gkiozos I, Kopitopoulou A, Kalkanis A, Vamvakaris IN, Judson MA, Syrigos KN. Sarcoidosis-like reactions induced by checkpoint inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(8):1076–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Luke JJ, Lezcano C, Hodi FS, Murphy GF. Antitumor granuloma formation by CD4+ T cells in a patient with rapidly progressive melanoma experiencing spiking fevers, neuropathy, and other immune-related toxicity after treatment with ipilimumab. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):e32–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Andersen R, Norgaard P, Al-Jailawi MK, Svane IM. Late development of splenic sarcoidosis-like lesions in a patient with metastatic melanoma and long-lasting clinical response to ipilimumab. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3(8):e954506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Timmermans WM, van Laar JA, van Hagen PM, van Zelm MC. Immunopathogenesis of granulomas in chronic autoinflammatory diseases. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016;5(12):e118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Broos CE, van Nimwegen M, Veen JC, Hoogsteden HC, Hendriks RW, van den Blink B, et al. Decreased cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 expression on regulatory T Cells and Th17 cells in sarcoidosis: double trouble? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(6):763–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


No funding supported the writing and the submission of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Treatment of the case: HG, DCZ. Conceptualization: SS, ID. Data curation: SS, DNZ. Investigation, Methodology: DNZ, DCZ, DP. Writing—original draft: SS, DNZ, DCZ, DP. Writing—review and editing: HG, ID. All authors have read and approved the manuscript, and ensure that this is the case.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stratigoula Sakellariou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval by committee was not required for this case report. It was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

HG has received grants and personal fees by Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis and personal fees by Amgen and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakellariou, S., Zouki, D.N., Ziogas, D.C. et al. Granulomatous colitis in a patient with metastatic melanoma under immunotherapy: a case report and literature review. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 227 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: