Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Economic burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis in Thailand

BMC Gastroenterology volume 21, Article number: 135 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has been recognised as a significant form of chronic liver disease and a common cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, resulting in a considerable financial burden on healthcare resources. Currently, there is no information regarding the economic burden of NASH in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study was to estimate the economic burden of NASH in Thailand as a lesson learned for LMICs.

Methods

To estimate the healthcare costs and prevalence of NASH with significant fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥ 2) in the general Thai population, an eleven-state lifetime horizon Markov model with 1-year cycle length was performed. The model comprised Thai population aged 18 years and older. The cohort size was based on Thailand Official Statistic Registration Systems. The incidence of NASH, transitional probabilities, and costs-of-illness were based on previously published literature, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The age-specific prevalence of NASH was based on Thai NASH registry data. Costs were expressed in 2019 US Dollars ($). As we undertook analysis from the payer perspective, only direct medical costs were included. All future costs were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

The estimated total number of patients with significant NASH was 2.9 million cases in 2019, based on a NASH prevalence of 5.74%. The total lifetime cost of significant NASH was $15.2 billion ($5,147 per case), representing approximately 3% of the 2019 GDP of Thailand. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the lifetime costs of significant NASH varied from $11.4 billion to $18.2 billion.

Conclusions

The economic burden associated with NASH is substantial in Thailand. This prompts clinicians and policy makers to consider strategies for NASH prevention and management.

Peer Review reports

Background

The excess accumulation of fat in the liver in patients without other causes such as excessive alcohol consumption or viral hepatitis is recognised as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [1]. It is a spectrum of diseases comprising two distinct conditions: non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [2]. The latter is a severe form in which the steatosis is accompanied by lobular inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning that can progress to liver fibrosis, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and other liver-related and non-liver related mortalities such as cardiovascular diseases [3,4,5,6,7]. These are the causes of the mounting number of hospital admissions, which are likely to continue to increase every year.

NASH is now considered the second most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States after chronic hepatitis C [8]. A number of previous studies have revealed that patients with NASH are at high risk for advanced liver disease [9,10,11], and those with significant fibrosis have a significantly higher risk of overall mortality than the general population [12]. A study on the epidemiology and disease burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis suggested that NASH can affect 3% to 5% of the global population, with minor variations at the country-specific level [13]. A study focusing on the economic impact of NASH in Hong Kong suggested that the projected cost of NASH over 20 years would be $1.32 billion, at $257 per-person year [14], while a study on the lifetime cost of advanced NASH in the United States demonstrated that the condition costs a total of $96.18 billion, at $139,724 per patient [15].

In Thailand, several studies have calculated the incidence and prevalence of NAFLD. Previous studies showed that the prevalence of NAFLD varied from 24.58 to 67% depending on patients’ underlying diseases [16,17,18,19]. However, information concerning the cost of illness of NASH—particularly NASH with significant fibrosis—is still limited in Thailand as well as in other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Certainly, an understanding of the economic burden of NASH in Thailand might be useful in helping policy makers with the development of strategies to manage this disease, which is likely to become a significant health issue in the near future. Therefore, this study set out to estimate the economic burden of NASH with significant fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥ 2), using Thailand as an example of an LMIC.

Methods

Description of model

A Markov model, which was built in Microsoft Excel, was adapted from a study conducted by Chongmelaxme et al. [20] to estimate the health care costs and prevalence of NASH with significant fibrosis (fibrosis stage 2 and higher) in Thailand. The model consisted of the normal state and the ten other health states, namely, no fibrosis (F0), fibrosis stage 1 (F1), fibrosis stage 2 (F2), fibrosis stage 3 (F3), compensated cirrhosis or fibrosis stage 4 (F4), decompensated cirrhosis, HCC, liver transplantation (LT), post-liver transplantation (post-LT), and death. The model was developed adhering to the natural history of the disease, which progressively worsens to more severe states, and regression was allowed only from F0 to normal, F1 to F0, F2 to F1, F3 to F2, and F4 to F3 (Fig. 1). The model comprised the general Thai population aged 18 years and older (51 million people) at the beginning of the model. In the analysis, the population in each age cohort entered the model at the normal state, and in the next cycle, they either remained in this state or transited to fibrosis stage 0 or death. The annual cycle length and a lifetime horizon were used in the model. The size of the population of each age group was based on Thailand Official Statistic Registration Systems, and the age-specific mortality rate (ASMR) was based on Global Health Observatory data from the World Health Organization [21, 22] (Additional file 1: Appendix 1 and 2). This model was performed from a payer perspective. All costs were discounted at the rate of 3%, in accordance with the recommendations of the Thai Health Technology Assessment (HTA) guidelines [23].

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Markov model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. CC compensated cirrhosis, DC decompensated cirrhosis, F0 fibrosis stage 0/ no fibrosis, F1 fibrosis stage 1, F2 fibrosis stage 2, F3 fibrosis stage 3, F4 fibrosis stage 4, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LT liver transplantation, Post-LT post-liver transplantation, TP transitional probability

Full size image

Input parameters

Overall, the input parameters were based on a literature review and country-specific data sources. All input parameters are detailed in (Table 1). The prevalence of NAFLD in the general Thai population was pooled from previously published local studies [17,18,19, 24], and the age-specific prevalence of NASH with significant fibrosis was calculated from the NASH registry data of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, and previous publications [25, 26] (see Additional file 1: Appendix 3 and 4). The transitional probabilities were mainly based on the study of Chongmelaxme et al. [20], which was the previous, model-based, economic evaluation study in Thailand.

Table 1 Input parameters, values, and data sources
Full size table

Transitional probabilities

The transitional probabilities for all fibrosis stages were reanalysed using data from a systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the rates of fibrosis progression [27]. The transitional probabilities from F4 to decompensated cirrhosis and to HCC were based on published articles [28,29,30,31,32], whereas that of patients experiencing liver transplantation was derived from country-specific studies [33,34,35]. The age-specific mortality rate (ASMR) of the Thai population [22] multiplied by the relative risks of mortality among NAFLD and cirrhosis patients [36] was used as the mortality rate. The mortality rate of HCC patients was derived from a study estimating the mortality rate of Thai patients with HCC [37]. Since data on the mortality rate of transplanted NASH patients are not available, this study applied the death rate associated with liver transplants and post-liver transplantation in chronic hepatitis B and C patients [38].

Costs

Since this study was conducted from a payer perspective, only the direct medical costs were estimated. A micro-costing method was utilised to estimate the cost of health care utilisation. The outpatient costs included outpatient medication care and laboratory testing, with NAFLD patients being assumed to visit an outpatient clinic four times a year [39]. The relevant costs were obtained from a costing database in Thailand [40]. The treatment costs only related to NAFLD and NASH. As the costs for compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and HCC are not available, they were assumed to be the same as for hepatitis C patients and were adapted from a country-specific study [41]. However, the costs of hepatitis C medications and viral testing were excluded. Also, it can be assumed that the costs of management of DC, HCC, LT, and post-LT would be the same in patients with advanced liver disease, regardless of the disease etiologies [15]. All costs were adjusted using the Consumer Price Index and reported in 2019 US Dollars (1 US Dollar = 32.3 Thai Baht) [42, 43].

Analysis

The outcome measures were the first-year cost, the fifth-year cost and the lifetime cost for each age group. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD and the NASH with significant fibrosis population were estimated for 2019. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed to assess uncertainty and the impact of the base-case input parameters on the model outputs and their robustness. The sensitivity analyses were conducted for all age groups.

Results

Prevalence of NAFLD and NASH with significant fibrosis

The model estimated that the total NAFLD prevalence rate would be 32.17% and the total NASH with significant fibrosis prevalence rate would be 5.74% in 2019. It was found that the 18–39 age group would have the highest prevalence rate, with 35.12% and 7.14% for NAFLD and NASH with significant fibrosis, respectively. In 2019, of the total NAFLD cohort, 17.84% of the cases were estimated to have NASH. Based on the Thailand population, our model predicted that the total number of adult patients with NAFLD would be 16.6 million, while the number of NASH patients with significant fibrosis would be 2.9 million in 2019. Additionally, about 50% of the NASH with significant fibrosis population in 2019 would comprise adults aged under 39 (Table 2; Additional file 1: Appendix 5).

Table 2 Prevalence of NAFLD and NASH with significant fibrosis in Thailand in 2019
Full size table

Estimated costs

We estimated the economic burden of NASH with significant fibrosis at the first-year, fifth year and over a lifetime. In the base-case analysis, the first-year costs would be $886,664,483, the fifth-year costs would be $886,376,246, and the total lifetime cost for NASH with significant fibrosis was projected to be $15.2 billion or $5,174 per case. In 2019, the GDP of Thailand was $543 billion which this burden account for approximately 3% of the 2019 GDP. On one hand, we found that the highest estimated lifetime cost per case would be for adults aged over 60, mounting to $9,492 per patient, while the lowest cost per case would be in the 18–39 age cohort, at $4,393 per case. In contrast, the lifetime cost of the population aged 18–39 would account for 42% of the total amount, whereas that of patients aged over 60 would account for 21% of the total (Table 3; Additional file 1: Appendix 6).

Table 3 Lifetime cost for NASH with significant fibrosis
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis

Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted for the NASH with significant fibrosis patients and included all age groups (Additional file 1: Appendix 7). The results showed that the total cases varied from 2.94 million to 2.99 million in 2019. Moreover, the lifetime cost of NASH with significant fibrosis was found to be around $15.2 billion, varying from $11.4 billion to $18.2 billion, with the lifetime cost per case averaging $5,147, ranging from $3,833 to $6,150 (Table 4; Fig. 2a, b).

Table 4 Sensitivity analysis results
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). PSA represented by box plots showing the median, 25th percentile, 75th percentile, and outlier cost of NASH with significant fibrosis of each age group (2019 $) (a) total lifetime costs (b) lifetime cost per case

Full size image

Discussion

This study showed that the estimated prevalence of NASH with significant fibrosis in the adult Thai population in 2019 would be 2.9 million cases, with an estimated cost of $886,376,245 in the fifth year. The predicted lifetime cost of this liver condition would be $15.2 billion, or $5,174 per case, which represented approximately 3% of the 2019 GDP of Thailand [45].

The NAFLD prevalence of Thailand from our study is relatively higher than those for Africa, North America, Europe, and other Asian countries, but similar to those for South America and the Middle East [9]. As to NASH, the total estimated NASH prevalence rate of our study, 5.74% of the Thai population, is similar to the rates for Canada and the US (5.2% [46] and 5.3% [47], respectively). However, these rates are slightly higher than the global prevalence, which ranges between 3 and 5% [13]. Interestingly, compared with other Asian countries such as China (2.4% [47]), Japan (3.0% [47]) and Hong Kong (4.5% [14]), the estimated NASH prevalence rate for Thailand is higher. This higher prevalence may be influenced by differences in ethnicity, genetic composition, diets, and sedentary lifestyles [14, 48]. Also, previous data showed that the growth rate of overweight and obesity has been much higher in recent decades in Thailand as compared to those countries [49]. However, these contributing factors need to be explored further. Nevertheless, awareness of this high prevalence for Thailand is important because it could urge clinicians and policy makers to focus on, and prepare for, the significant burdens presented by this disease.

In addition, when considered individual age groups, our results revealed that the lower-aged population has a higher prevalence of NAFLD and NASH. This could result from the older population having lower levels of fat deposits in the liver [50,51,52], which might be explained by the accumulated fat in the liver being burned out and becoming more fibrotic. Moreover, younger people today will face a higher burden of metabolic syndrome as compared to earlier generations [53], this could contribute to higher NAFLD and NASH prevalence in the lower-aged cohort.

The total lifetime cost of NASH is substantially high, being equivalent to approximately 3% of the GDP of Thailand for 2019 [45]. Focusing on each age group, we found that the lifetime cost per case for the younger age group was lower than that for the older group. Although the life expectancy of the older population is shorter than that of the younger population, the total lifetime cost per case is double that of the older population because more advanced diseases and higher progression rates are detected in the older population. Additionally, our results reveal the significant burden from NASH with significant fibrosis which is not only comparable with other significant health issues in Thailand such as alcohol consumption [54], smoking-related diseases [55], and obesity [56], but also higher in terms of economic burden resulting in the loss of health care resources and the country’s economy.

Evidently, NASH with significant fibrosis cause the financial burden in both developing and developed countries. When comparing the total number of NASH cases and the financial burden revealed by our study with the corresponding data from developed countries [15], the costs and the number of cases in Thailand are lower. Nevertheless, they have a relatively high impact when considered in relation to the Thai economy.

It is important to note that our study estimated the burden from a payer perspective; hence, the costs of comorbidities, nonmedical costs, and societal costs of NASH were excluded from the model. This means that the economic burden of this disease is likely to have been markedly underestimated. If such parameters were included, the total costs of NASH would be larger because it would include the money spent by patients and their household members, as well as non-monetary losses, such as opportunity costs and lost income caused by illness.

In Thailand's context, health care services are still restricted, particularly human resources. This is a critical issue that must be considered. There is a significant human impact both in terms of the healthcare professionals needed to deal with the disease and its consequences, and the loss of productive workers due to the illness. From our findings, around 3 million cases of NASH are predicted in 2019, yet there are only about 61,000 clinicians in Thailand [57]. This equates to a ratio of 1:50 for the doctors available to the number of NASH with significant fibrosis patients. There is an even lower ratio for the current number of hepatologists in Thailand (1:6,000 for NASH with significant fibrosis, and 1:130,000 for the general population, of whom about 6% may be diagnosed with NASH at any time). These ratios indicate that if a strategy is not developed to prevent NASH and its consequences, there will be insufficient numbers of medical professionals to provide adequate care to all patients and to effectively monitor the disease. As well, there will not be sufficient funding available to support patients from low-income households or those receiving healthcare via Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme.

Thus, we should develop strategies to prevent NASH and its progressive state; otherwise, we will have to deal with the high costs of the disease. Screening is one possible strategy. It could enable early disease detection and promote early treatment, which would require relatively low funding. However, the cost of the screening strategy itself should be considered; therefore, a further study on screening costs is required.

Both NASH and its complications present huge burdens. For example, while cirrhosis and HCC need high-cost treatments, these diseases typically have poor outcomes. This study only considered NASH and its consequent diseases; when we take the real-world situation into account, there is much evidence that NASH is associated with comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases [8, 14, 58,59,60]. It may also lead to higher mortality and a higher financial burden for those with underlying diseases [10, 36]. Thus, predictions of the economic and financial burdens of the disease are important evidence in support of the need for preventative strategies, especially in developing countries.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the economic burden of NASH in LMICs. This study used Thailand as an example LMIC to reflect the increased burden of NASH in Southeast Asia. Our results are consistent with other studies that claimed that the burden of NAFLD and NASH are large and are ever increasing [14, 15, 46, 59]. The findings of the present study highlight that the prevention and treatment of NASH should be addressed by every LMIC in the world.

A key strength of this study was that its findings are likely to be valid as most of the input data used for the model were drawn from local sources. Secondly, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis that we conducted determined that the model was robust in its estimations of the costs of NASH with significant fibrosis.

There are some limitations to this study. First, there is a lack of biopsy-proven NAFLD prevalence data for the Thai general population. We therefore pooled the prevalence of NAFLD from studies [17,18,19, 24] that had diagnosed the disease using imaging tests (ultrasonography) and transient elastography techniques (FibroScan). Because of their higher sensitivity, these information sources provided a more accurate disease prevalence than studies that had used liver function tests as the diagnostic method. Moreover, the prevalence of NAFLD was consistent with the previous systematic review and meta-analysis in Asia [61]. Second, there are no direct assessments of the incidence and prevalence of NASH in NAFLD patients, in view of the high risk of severe complications from liver biopsies conducted on NAFLD patients without any explicit risk of having NASH with significant fibrosis. Consequently, the NASH with significant fibrosis data were limited. Hence, we adopted the biopsy-proven and elastography-confirmed NASH with significant fibrosis prevalence to signify the proportion of NAFLD cases in Thailand [25, 26] as well as to minimise errors from the sampling variability that may occur in biopsy diagnostic method [62]. Third, we used the constant rate of liver transplantation which does not vary according to age of the patients. Nevertheless, the probability of liver transplantation was based on local data [33,34,35]. Forth, due to the unavailability of local or NASH-specific data, a few input parameters were retrieved from international studies, for instance, the transitional probabilities of fibrosis progression and regression. As well, the mortality rates of liver transplant and post-transplantation patients were adopted from the rates of Thai patients with hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections. Nevertheless, this information should be able to be used as representative data for the Thai population [20]. Fifth, regardless of clinical manifestation, entire patients in this model who had been diagnosed NASH were assumed to receive standard treatment and applied in the cost calculation. In the real-world practice, those without clinical abnormality might not receive the treatment. Lastly, our study did not consider other non-liver-related events which are known to associated with NASH such as cardiovascular diseases, obesity, etc. Thus, the total costs will increase if the treatment of those comorbidities are included.

Conclusions

NASH with significant fibrosis cause substantial economic burden in Thailand. This should prompt clinicians and policy makers to pay more attention in developing and implementing the effective strategies for the prevention and management of NASH.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASMR:

Age specific mortality rate

CC:

Compensated cirrhosis

F0:

Fibrosis stage 0/ no fibrosis

F1:

Fibrosis stage 1

F2:

Fibrosis stage 2

F3:

Fibrosis stage 3

F4:

Fibrosis stage 4

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HTA:

Health Technology Assessment

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

LT:

Liver transplantation

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NAFL:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver

NASH:

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

post-LT:

Post-liver transplantation

References

  1. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Sanyal AJ. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Papatheodoridi M, Cholongitas E. Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): current concepts. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(38):4574–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balp M-M, Krieger N, Przybysz R, Way N, Cai J, Zappe D, McKenna SJ, Wall G, Janssens N, Tapper E. The burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) among patients from Europe: a real-world patient-reported outcomes study. JHEP Rep. 2019;1(3):154–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Glen J, Floros L, Day C, Pryke R. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2016;354:i4428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh S, Kuftinec GN, Sarkar S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in South Asians: a review of the literature. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017;5:76–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease—a global public health perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;70:531–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasper P, Martin A, Lang S, Kutting F, Goeser T, Demir M, Steffen HM. NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases: a clinical review. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01709-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, George J, Bugianesi E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dulai PS, Singh S, Patel J, Soni M, Prokop LJ, Younossi Z, Sebastiani G, Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, et al. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017;65(5):1557–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim D, Kim WR, Kim HJ, Therneau TM. Association between noninvasive fibrosis markers and mortality among adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States. Hepatology. 2013;57(4):1357–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Mills PR, Keach JC, Lafferty HD, Stahler A, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, associates with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease HHS public access. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(2):389–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Povsic M, Wong OY, Perry R, Bottomley J. A structured literature review of the epidemiology and disease burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Adv Ther. 2019;36(7):1574–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tampi RP, Wong VWS, Wong GLH, Shu SST, Chan HLY, Fung J, Stepanova M, Younossi ZM. Modelling the economic and clinical burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in East Asia: data from Hong Kong. Hepatol Res. 2020;50(9):1024–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Younossi ZM, Tampi R, Priyadarshini M, Nader F, Younossi IM, Racila A. Burden of illness and economic model for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Hepatology. 2019;69(2):564–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phisalprapa P, Ujjin A, Apisarnthanarak P, Charoensak A, Washirasaksiri C, Srivanichakorn W, Pandejpong D, Charatcharoenwitthaya P. Sa1050 Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in asian individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(5):S-947.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pitug B. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and correlation between revalence of NAFLD and obesity in people living in borabue district, Mahasarakham province. Mahasarakham Hosp J. 2017;14(2):22–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leelaprasert S. Prevalence and risk factor of non alcoholic fatty liver disease using abdominal ultrasound in Krabi hospital. Reg 11 Med J. 2015;29(4):597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rattanangamkul M. The relation of non alcoholic fatty liver and metabolic syndrome in Thais. Durakij Pundit University; 2017.

  20. Chongmelaxme B, Phisalprapa P, Sawangjit R, Dilokthornsakul P, Chaiyakunapruk N. Weight reduction and pioglitazone are cost-effective for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Thailand. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(2):267–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Official statistics registration systems. Population Statistics. https://stat.bora.dopa.go.th/download/list.php. Accessed 6 Dec 2019.

  22. World Health Organization. Life tables: Thailand. https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.country.country-THA?lang-en. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.

  23. Teerawattananon Y. Guidelines for health technology assessment in Thailand (second edition). J Med Assoc Thail. 2014;97(5):S4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thinkhamrop K, Khuntikeo N, Phonjitt P, Chamadol N, Thinkhamrop B, Moore MA, Promthet S. Association between diabetes mellitus and fatty liver based on ultrasonography screening in the world’s highest cholangiocarcinoma incidence region, Northeast Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(9):3931–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saokaew S, Kanchanasuwan S, Apisarnthanarak P, Charoensak A, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Phisalprapa P, Chaiyakunapruk N. Clinical risk scoring for predicting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in metabolic syndrome patients (NAFLD-MS score). Liver Int. 2017;37(10):1535–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Treeprasertsuk S, Piyachaturawat P, Soontornmanokul T, Wisedopas-Klaikaew N, Komolmit P, Tangkijavanich P. Accuracy of noninvasive scoring systems to assess advanced liver fibrosis in Thai patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2016;10(s1):s49–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver versus nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(4):643–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hui J. Long-term outcomes of cirrhosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis compared with hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38(2):420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanyal AJ, Banas C, Sargeant C, Luketic VA, Sterling RK, Stravitz RT, Shiffman ML, Heuman D, Coterrell A, Fisher RA, et al. Similarities and differences in outcomes of cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2006;43(4):682–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ascha MS, Hanouneh IA, Lopez R, Tamimi TA-R, Feldstein AF, Zein NN. The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51(6):1972–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ratziu V, Bonyhay L, Di Martino V, Charlotte F, Cavallaro L, Sayegh-Tainturier M-H, Giral P, Grimaldi A, Opolon P, Poynard T. Survival, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma in obesity-related cryptogenic cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002;35(6):1485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yatsuji S, Hashimoto E, Tobari M, Taniai M, Tokushige K, Shiratori K. Clinical features and outcomes of cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis compared with cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(2):248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pachanee K, Wongphan T, Prakongsai P. Economic evaluation and budget impact of liver transplantation among Thai adults in universal health insurance coverage. J Health Sci. 2016;25(5):908–19.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Subwongcharoen S, Treepongkaruna S-A, Leelawat K, Ruksakul K. Long-term outcome of patients undergoing liver transplantation at Rajavithi Hospital. Thailand J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95:1292–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Poovorawan K, Treeprasertsuk S, Thepsuthammarat K, Wilairatana P, Kitsahawong B, Phaosawasdi K. The burden of cirrhosis and impact of universal coverage public health care system in Thailand: nationwide study. Ann Hepatol. 2015;14(6):862–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stål P, Kechagias S, Hultcrantz R. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1547–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Leerapun A, Thaikruea L, Pisespongsa P, Chitapanarux T, Praisontarangkul O-A, Thongsawat S. Clinical features and prognostic factors for liver cancer from a referral center in northern Thailand. J Med Assoc Thail. 2013;96(5):531–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kositamongkol P, Sanphasitvong V, Sirivatanauksorn Y, Pongpaibul A, Limsrichamrern S, Mahawithitwong P, Asavakarn S, Tovikkai C, Dumronggittigule W. Outcome of liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients at Siriraj Hospital. Transplant Proc. 2017;49(5):1114–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Phisalprapa P, Supakankunti S, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Apisarnthanarak P, Charoensak A, Washirasaksiri C, Srivanichakorn W, Chaiyakunapruk N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasonography screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in metabolic syndrome patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(17):e6585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Riewpaiboon A. Standard cost lists for health technology assessment. https://costingmenu.hitap.net/. Accessed 6 Dec 2019.

  41. Thongsawat S, Piratvisuth T, Pramoolsinsap C, Chutaputti A, Tanwandee T, Thongsuk D. Resource utilization and direct medical costs of chronic hepatitis C in Thailand: a heavy but manageable economic burden. Value Health Reg Issues. 2014;3(1):12–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bureau of Trade and Economic Indices. Consumer Price Index (CPI) of Thailand. http://www.price.moc.go.th/price/cpi/index_new_all.asp. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  43. Bank of Thailand. Historical Foreign Exchange Rates. https://www.bot.or.th/App/BTWS_STAT/statistics/ReportPage.aspx?reportID=123&language=eng. Accessed 8 May 2020.

  44. Sirivatanauksorn Y, Kongkaewpaisan N, Pongpaibul A, Limsrichamrern S, Mahawithitwong P, Kositamongkol P, Tovikkai C, Asavakarn S. Outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation in non-malignant end-stage liver diseases. Transplant Proc. 2014;46(3):778–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. World Bank. GDP (current US$)-Thailand https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=TH. Accessed 10 May 2020.

  46. Swain MG, Ramji A, Patel K, Sebastiani G, Shaheen AA, Tam E, Marotta P, Elkhashab M, Bajaj HS, Estes C, et al. Burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Canada, 2019–2030: a modelling study. CMAJ Open. 2020;8(2):E429–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Estes C, Anstee QM, Arias-Loste MT, Bantel H, Bellentani S, Caballeria J, Colombo M, Craxi A, Crespo J, Day CP, et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016–2030. J Hepatol. 2018;69:896–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fan JG, Kim SU, Wong VWS. New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia. J Hepatol. 2017;67(4):862–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). NATIONAL ADULT BODY-MASS INDEX Evolution of BMI over time. https://ncdrisc.org/data-downloads-adiposity.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.

  50. Bertolotti M, Lonardo A, Mussi C, Baldelli E, Pellegrini E, Ballestri S, Romagnoli D, Loria P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and aging: epidemiology to management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14185–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Frith J, Day CP, Henderson E, Burt AD, Newton JL. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in older people. Gerontology. 2009;55(6):607–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mak KM, Chu E, Lau KHV, Kwong AJ. Liver fibrosis in elderly cadavers: localization of collagen types I, III, and IV, α-smooth muscle actin, and elastic fibers. Anat Rec. 2012;295(7):1159–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Acosta-Cazares B, Acuin C, Adams RJ, Aekplakorn W, Afsana K, Aguilar-Salinas CA, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. The Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Yothasamut J, Lertpitakpong C, Thitiboonsuwan K, Neramitpitagkul P, Chaikledkaew U. The economic costs of alcohol consumption in Thailand, 2006. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bundhamcharoen K, Aungkulanon S, Makka N, Shibuya K. Economic burden from smoking-related diseases in Thailand. Tob Control. 2016;25(5):532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pitayatienanan P, Butchon R, Yothasamut J, Aekplakorn W, Teerawattananon Y, Suksomboon N, Thavorncharoensap M. Economic costs of obesity in Thailand: a retrospective cost-of-illness study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. The Medical Council of Thailand. Health workforce statistics. https://www.tmc.or.th/pdf/st-tmc-02-07-20-001.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2020.

  58. Gholam PM, Flancbaum L, Machan JT, Charney DA, Kotler DP. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in severely obese subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(2):399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):123–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sayiner M, Koenig A, Henry L, Younossi ZM. Epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States and the rest of the world. Clin Liver Dis. 2016;20(2):205–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Li J, Zou B, Yeo YH, Feng Y, Xie X, Lee DH, Fujii H, Wu Y, Kam LY, Ji F, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and outcome of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Asia, 1999–2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(5):389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A, Capron F, Poynard T, Group LS. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(7):1898–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University for the data and Miss Pinyapat Ariyakunaphan, research assistant, for collecting the data. The authors, also, gratefully thank David Park for editorial support with the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Ambulatory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Pochamana Phisalprapa, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Weerachai Srivanichakorn & Chaiwat Washirasaksiri

  2. Department of Pharmacy Technicians, Sirindhorn College of Public Health Suphanburi, Suphanburi, Thailand

    Ratthanon Prasitwarachot

  3. Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Pranaidej Hengswat

  4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand

    Sombat Treeprasertsuk

  5. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya

  6. Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA

    Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

Authors
  1. Pochamana Phisalprapa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ratthanon Prasitwarachot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chayanis Kositamongkol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pranaidej Hengswat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weerachai Srivanichakorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chaiwat Washirasaksiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sombat Treeprasertsuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PP, RP, PH, CK and NC contributed to the study concept and design, data acquisition, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript drafting, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final review of the manuscript. WS and CW participated in the data acquisition, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final review of the manuscript. ST and PC participated in the study concept and design, data acquisition, data interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The protocol for this study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (Si 540/2011). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk received an honorarium as advisory board for Intercept. All other authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix 1

. Thai population; Appendix 2. Age-specific mortality rate of Thai general population, NAFLD patients and cirrhosis patients; Appendix 3. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in Thailand; Appendix 4. Prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis in Thailand; Appendix 5. Estimated number of patients in advanced health state; Appendix 6. The proportion of total costs by health state; Appendix 7. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phisalprapa, P., Prasitwarachot, R., Kositamongkol, C. et al. Economic burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis in Thailand. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01720-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01720-w

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us