Skip to main content

Quinolone resistant Salmonella species isolated from pediatric patients with diarrhea in central Iran

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the frequency and the antibiotic resistance patterns of Salmonella species that were isolated from infectious diarrhea samples taken from pediatric patients in central Iran.

Methods

The study analyzed 230 stool specimens that were cultured on XLD, MacConkey agar and GN broth. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the Salmonella genus. The antibiotic resistance profiles and the frequency of quinolone and integron genes were obtained.

Results

Out of 230 samples of infectious diarrhea, 21 (9.1%) cases of Salmonella spp. were identified using culture methods. Another 28 (12.1%) samples had positive PCR results, with S. serovar Paratyphi B and C (9/21; 42.8%) and S. Typhi (3/21; 14.3%) being the most recognized. The highest antibiotic resistance rates were found for nalidixic acid (15/21; 71.4%), tetracycline (9/21; 42.8%). However, six (28.5%) of isolates were found resistant to cotrimoxazole, ampicillin and chloramphenicol. Among the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants, qnrS, qnrA, and qnrB were positive in (9/15; 60%), (6/15; 40%) and (3/15; 20%) of the isolates, respectively. Class 1 and 2 integrons were identified in 15 (71.4%) and 3 (14.3%) isolates, respectively.

Conclusion

High rates of quinolone resistant and low frequency of MDR Salmonella spp. isolates were identified in central Iran, similar to findings in other parts of Asia. To prevent the spread of these resistant strains, the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. isolates should be under constant surveillance, and empiric antibiotic therapy should be adapted appropriately.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastroenteritis remains a serious public health problem. This common human disease is the second leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries, including Iran, and has a particularly high morbidity in children younger than 5 years old (with an estimated 525,000 deaths per year worldwide) [1]. Diarrheal diseases can negatively affect early pediatric growth both through enteric dysfunction and the impaired uptake of macronutrients and micronutrients [2]. Salmonella is a common cause of infectious gastroenteritis among the pediatric age group in many developing countries [3]. Globally, human salmonellosis causes 200 million to over 1 billion disease cases annually, with over 150 thousand of these cases resulting in death [4]. The S. enterica serovars Typhi (S. Typhi) and Paratyphi (S. Paratyphi A, B and C) are the most common causes of human salmonellosis worldwide [5]. Initially, the antimicrobial resistance profiles of these Salmonella serovars were determined against the antibiotics of ampicillin, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and chloramphenicol, and bacteria with simultaneous resistance to all three types of antibiotics were characterized as multi-drug resistant (MDR) [6]. Currently, MDR typhoid is in decline in the Asian regions, where there is a high level of resistance to second-line drugs, such as quinolones and fluoroquinolones [6]. This increased antimicrobial resistance has decreased the number of effective treatment options and, consequently, increased the treatment costs, the risk of complications and the death rate, especially in the pediatric age group [3].

In the summer, diarrhea and dysentery are so common among the pediatric patients at central Iran [7,8,9,10,11]. It is not efficient to identify typhoidal Salmonella in clinical detection labs, and specific information about the scale of typhoidal Salmonella in Iran’s central region is not available. Therefore, this study has been conducted to examine in depth the abundance, the phenotypic antimicrobial resistance levels and the resistance gene content of the region’s Salmonella species by examining diarrhea samples from patients.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

This study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Arak University of Medical Sciences (ARAKMU.REC. 93-176-30 and 1395.83). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. For this cross-sectional, descriptive study, 230 samples of diarrhea were gathered from pediatric patients who were referred to the Children’s Educational-Therapeutic Center affiliated with Arak University of Medical Sciences (in the city of Arak, Iran) due to diarrhea from May 2015 to May 2016. The parent/guardian consent form was provided for participants under 16 years old.

The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: a completed consent form and a questionnaire was filled out by the patient or the patient’s parents and caregivers; observation of more than five white blood cells per high-power field (HPF) in a stool specimen [12] and the patient had not taken antibiotics for a week before consultation at the hospital.

Phenotypic investigation

The fecal samples were cultured in Gram-negative (GN) broth, xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) and MacConkey media (Merck, Hamburg, Germany); then biochemical and serological tests were performed [7]. Application programming interface (API) testing (Biomeriux, France) was used to confirm the presence of Salmonella spp. isolated. S. enterica subsp. enterica PTCC 1709, S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi A PTCC 1230, S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B PTCC 1231 and S. Typhi PTCC 1609 were used as controls in each assay (obtained from the Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology). S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi C control strains were acquired from the microbiology department of the Arak University of Medical Sciences.

Investigating Salmonella antibiotic resistance by disk diffusion

Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines [13], an antibiogram assay was performed on the isolated Salmonella spp. colonies. The antibiotic discs contained nalidixic acid (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftizoxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and imipenem (10 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom).

Genotypic investigations

DNA extraction

DNA was directly extracted from the fecal samples and the reference Salmonella spp. isolates using the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The amount and purity of the extracted DNA were measured with a NanoDrop apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham. Massachusetts, United States) and confirmed using the universal primers for the bacterial 16S rRNA gene [8].

Genotypic identification

PCR of the inlA gene was performed to confirm the Salmonella genus [14]. PCR of the qnr determinant genes qnrS, qnrA, and qnrB was performed to amplify the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) targets. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes of the quinolone-resistant Salmonella spp. isolates were also identified using DNA sequencing techniques [7]. Sul1,2 for sulfonamide resistance and quartenary ammonium compounds (qac) resistance genes were investigated using PCR method (Table 1) [15].

Table 1 The primers used in this study

Integron detection

To investigate class 1, 2 and 3 integrons, PCR assay was performed as previously described in the literature (Table 1) [7].

Results

Of the 230 analyzed samples, 21 (9.1%) and 28 (12.1%) were found to be positive for Salmonella spp. using the exclusive culture and PCR methods, respectively. All the culture-positive samples were identified as positive using PCR; and seven of the samples that were culture-negative were also identified as positive using PCR. Of the 21 patients (9.1%) afflicted with Salmonella spp., 9 (42.8%) were female and 12 (57.1%) were male, resulting in a female-to-male infection ratio of 1:1.3. The average age of the people afflicted with salmonellosis was 4 years and 5 months. The youngest diseased person was an 8-month-old girl; the oldest was a 12-year-old boy. The clinical symptoms among the people suffering from salmonellosis are given in Table 2.

Table 2 Frequency of clinical symptoms in pediatric patients with Salmonella spp.

Phenotypic and genotypic investigation

Of the 21 cultured Salmonella spp. isolates, 9 (42.8%) were identified as S. Paratyphi B, 9 (42.8%) were identified as S. Paratyphi C, and 3 (14.3%) was identified as S. Typhi; no case of S. Paratyphi A was found.

Phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance determination

Using the CLSI 2017 guidelines, the highest resistance rates in Salmonella spp. were observed against nalidixic acid (15/21; 71.4%), tetracycline (9/21; 42.8%), cotrimoxazole (6/21; 28.5%), ampicillin (6/21; 28.5%), and chloramphenicol (6/21; 28.5%) (Table 3). All of the Salmonella isolates were susceptible to cefixime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, ceftazidime, cefoxitin, cefepime, gentamicin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem. No cases of MDR were observed. All isolates carrying PMQR contain similar mutations in parC at amino acid 80 (replacement of serine with isoleucine; GenBank accession no. HM068910) and gyrA at amino acid 83 (replacement of serine with leucine). The frequency of antibiotic resistance genes among Salmonella spp. was given in Table 4.

Table 3 Phenotypic antibiotic resistance rates in Salmonella spp.
Table 4 The frequency of antibiotic resistance genes among Salmonella spp.

Discussion

The frequency of salmonellosis, as determined by bacterial culture and PCR, was 9.1% and 12.1%, respectively. Of these two methods, the sensitivity of the PCR method was higher [16, 17]. Other studies conducted in Sudan, Iran (Tehran), Iraq reported frequencies of 4%, 7%, and 14.8%, respectively [14, 18, 19]. These differences in the frequency of salmonellosis may be related to a variety of factors, including exposure to the natural reservoirs of Salmonella species in these geographical areas, differences in climate and many other environmental conditions, as well as age differences, and differences in the level of economic development, the level of individual hygiene, and contamination via food preparers who are chronic carriers of Salmonella [5].

In the present study, the most prevalent Salmonella enterica serovar isolates were S. Paratyphi B and S. Paratyphi C (42.8%). In other studies, S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi B were reported to be the predominant serogroup in Iran (Tehran) and Ethiopia, respectively [19, 20]. General hygiene, socioeconomic conditions, and ecological conditions affect the frequency of Salmonella spp. serogroups [4].

Because salmonellosis is spread by food, any information regarding the frequency and the antimicrobial resistance of the isolates is a public health concern [21]. The antibiotic resistance properties of Salmonella spp have been reported to vary and be regionally distinct [22]. The present study is the first to report on the frequency of salmonellosis and its associated resistance patterns for a panel of 16 antibiotics in central Iran.

The traditional first-line drugs used to treat Salmonella spp. are chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and cotrimoxazole [6]. In Iran (Tehran) and Mexico, 11% and 33% of the strains have been reported to be resistant to chloramphenicol, respectively [3, 23]. In Iran (Tehran), Mexico, and Pakistan 13.5%, 20%, and 66.1% of the strains were found to be resistant to ampicillin [23,24,25]. In Iran (Tehran), Mexico, and Pakistan 23%, 28.8%, and 66.5% of the strains were resistant to cotrimoxazole, respectively [23,24,25]. These differences indicate that resistance to Salmonella first-choice agents may be related to presentation from different sources [26]. In Iran (Tehran), Sul1 was found to be resistant in 32% of the strains [3]. In India, Sul1 and Sul2 were found to be resistant in 100% and 77.7% of the strains, respectively [27]. The difference in frequency of sulfonamide-resistant in different regions mainly relates to different antibiotic usage patterns [5]. However, MDR Salmonella spp. are a worldwide concern but is not very common [6].

In Iran (Tehran), Malaysia, and Nigeria, 51.8%, 42%, and 65.9% of the strains were resistant to tetracycline, respectively [28,29,30].

Although quinolone/fluoroquinolones are intended to be appropriate drugs against resistant isolates, the enhancement in antimicrobial resistance is a burden in controlling infections caused by Salmonella spp. [31]. In the present study, 71.4% of the Salmonella strains were found to be resistant to nalidixic acid, and none of the strains was resistant to ciprofloxacin. In Iran (Tehran), Nigeria, and India, 66.6%, 59%, and 96% of the strains were resistant to nalidixic acid, respectively [32,33,34].

In this study, qnrS, qnrA, and qnrB were found at 60%, 40%, and 20%, respectively, in nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella strains. In Iran (Tehran), qnrS, qnrA, and qnrB were found at 56.5%, 30.4%, and 1.1% in the strains, respectively [32]. In Brazil, qnrS, qnrB, and qnrA were found at 53.3%, 40%, and 0% in the strains, respectively [31], while in India, qnrB was at 70% and none of the strains showed resistance to qnrA and qnrS [35]. Quinolones, and especially fluoroquinolones, are widely used in poultry farms and in the treatment of companion animals in Iran, and this contributes to the risk of resistant zoonotic bacterial agents being spread via the food chain [36]. Generally, studies have determined a direct relationship between quinolone usage in poultry and the frequency of nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella spp. isolates from humans [37]. Fluoroquinolone resistance is prevalent across Asia, in part because of the widespread consumption of this class of antimicrobials [6].

In the current study, qac were found at 42.8% in Salmonella isolates, while in Iran (Tehran) and Iraq, qac were found at 31% and 60% in the strains, respectively [3, 38].

In Iran (Tehran), int1 (32%), int2 (13%), and int3 (0%) were found in the strains [3], while in Hong Kong, int1 was found in 13% of the strains but none showed resistance to int2 and int3 [39]. Of the three categories of integrons pertinent to antimicrobial resistance, the class I integron is the most frequently obtained in Gram-negative bacteria [40]. The prevalence of integrons in the enterobacteriacae family has been varied and has played a significant role in the development of drug-resistant bacteria [41]. Thus, the high prevalence of antibiotic resistance probably relates to the high prevalence of class I and II integrons.

Conclusion

To reduce and prevent outbreaks of quinolone resistance, and prevention of the emergence of MDR Salmonella spp., a coherent program needs to be developed for the control and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in the long run. Further, empiric antibiotic therapy should be adapted appropriately, and Salmonella carriers should be identified and given specific treatment in order to prevent this transmission route.

Availability of data and materials

All data pertaining to this study are within the manuscript in sections sample collection and results. The datasets analyzed and/or used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

XLD:

Xylose lysine deoxycholate

PMQR:

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance

MDR:

Multi-drug resistant

HPF:

High-power field

BLAST:

Basic local alignment search tool

References

  1. 1.

    Liu J, Platts-Mills JA, Juma J, Kabir F, Nkeze J, Okoi C, et al. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1291–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Troeger C, Colombara DV, Rao PC, Khalil IA, Brown A, Brewer TG, et al. Global disability-adjusted life-year estimates of long-term health burden and undernutrition attributable to diarrhoeal diseases in children younger than 5 years. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(3):e255–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tajbakhsh M, Hendriksen RS, Nochi Z, Zali MR, Aarestrup FM, Garcia-Migura L. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. recovered from patients admitted to six different hospitals in Tehran, Iran from 2007 to 2008. Folia Microbiol. 2012;57(2):91–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chlebicz A, Śliżewska K. Campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, yersiniosis, and listeriosis as zoonotic foodborne diseases: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(4):901–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Britto CD, Wong VK, Dougan G, Pollard AJ. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the etiological agent of typhoid. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(10):e0006779.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Abbasi E, Abtahi H, van Belkum A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Multidrug-resistant Shigella infection in pediatric patients with diarrhea from central Iran. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1535.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Abbasi E, van Belkum A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Quinolone and macrolide-resistant campylobacter jejuni in pediatric gastroenteritis patients from Central Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(7):1080–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Abbasi E, Mondanizadeh M, van Belkum A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Multi-drug-resistant diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes in pediatric patients with gastroenteritis from central Iran. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:1387.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Abbasi E, Amouzandeh-Nobaveh A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Frequency of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from diarrhea samples of pediatric patients at central Iran. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;8(2):172.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Abbasi E, Khansari-nejad B, Abtahi H, Akbari M, Ghaznavi-rad E. Low prevalence of Aeromonas hydrophilain infectious diarrhea samples of pediatric patients in Arak, Iran. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;5(1):15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mazaheri M, Haji Rezaei M, Aalinezhad M, Sharif MR, Akhavan T. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of pediatric Campylobacter spp. Acute Gastroenteritis. Arch Pediatric Infect Dis. 2016:1–6.

  13. 13.

    Patel J, Cockerill III F, Eliopoulos G, Jenkins S, Lewis J, Limbago B, et al. M100 Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. United State: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017:240.

  14. 14.

    Harb A, Abraham S, Rusdi B, Laird T, O’Dea M, Habib I. Molecular detection and epidemiological features of selected bacterial, viral, and parasitic enteropathogens in stool specimens from children with acute diarrhea in Thi-Qar Governorate, Iraq. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9):1573.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Guo W, Shan K, Xu B, Li J. Determining the resistance of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae to common disinfectants and elucidating the underlying resistance mechanisms. Pathog Global Health. 2015;109(4):184–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mamuye Y, Metaferia G, Birhanu A, Desta K, Fantaw S. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Shigella and Salmonella among under 5 children with acute diarrhoea: A cross-sectional study at selected public health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Clinical Microbiology: Open Access. 2015.

  17. 17.

    Ranjbar R, Bolandian M, Behzadi P. Virulotyping of Shigella spp isolated from pediatric patients in Tehran Iran. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2017;64(1):71–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Saeed A, Abd H, Sandstrom G. Microbial aetiology of acute diarrhoea in children under five years of age in Khartoum, Sudan. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(Pt 4):432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Farahani NN, Jazi FM, Nikmanesh B, Asadolahi P, Kalani BS, Amirmozafari N. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Salmonella and Shigella species isolated from pediatric diarrhea in Tehran. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2018 (in press).

  20. 20.

    Asrat D. Shigella and Salmonella serogroups and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Ethiopia. 2008.

  21. 21.

    Vlahović K, Matica B, Bata I, Pavlak M, Pavičić Ž, Popović M, et al. Campylobacter, Salmonella and Chlamydia in free-living birds of Croatia. Eur J Wildl Res. 2004;50(3):127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Eng S-K, Pusparajah P, Ab Mutalib N-S, Ser H-L, Chan K-G, Lee L-H. Salmonella: a review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front Life Sci. 2015;8(3):284–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zaidi MB, Estrada-García T, Campos FD, Chim R, Arjona F, Leon M, et al. Incidence, clinical presentation, and antimicrobial resistance trends in Salmonella and Shigella infections from children in Yucatan, Mexico. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mahmoudi S, Pourakbari B, Moradzadeh M, Eshaghi H, Ramezani A, Ashtiani MTH, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Shigella spp. among children with gastroenteritis in an Iranian referral hospital. Microbial Pathog. 2017;109:45–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Qamar FN, Azmatullah A, Kazi AM, Khan E, Zaidi AKM. A three-year review of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A in Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8(08):981–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hasan R, Zafar A, Abbas Z, Mahraj V, Malik F, Zaidi A. Antibiotic resistance among Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A in Pakistan (2001–2006). J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2(04):289–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Adesiji YO, Deekshit VK, Karunasagar I. Antimicrobial-resistant genes associated with Salmonella spp. isolated from human, poultry, and seafood sources. Food Sci Nutr. 2014;2(4):436–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ranjbar R, Giammanco GM, Farshad S, Owlia P, Aleo A, Mammina C. Serotypes, antibiotic resistance, and class 1 integrons in Salmonella isolates from pediatric cases of enteritis in Tehran, Iran. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011;8(4):547–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yoke-Kqueen C, Learn-Han L, Noorzaleha A, Son R, Sabrina S, Jiun-Horng S, et al. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolated from indigenous vegetables and poultry in Malaysia. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;46(3):318–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Akinyemi K, Smith S, Oyefolu AB, Coker A. Multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar typhi isolated from patients with typhoid fever complications in Lagos, Nigeria. Public Health. 2005;119(4):321–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pribul BR, Festivo ML, Rodrigues MS, Costa RG, Rodrigues ECdP, de Souza M, et al. Characteristics of quinolone resistance in Salmonella spp isolates from the food chain in Brazil. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Malehmir S, Ranjbar R, Harzandi N. The molecular study of antibiotic resistance to quinolones in Salmonella enterica strains isolated in Tehran, Iran. Open Microbiol J. 2017;11:189.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Akinyemi K, Coker A. Trends of antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar typhi isolated from hospitalized patients from 1997 to 2004 in Lagos, Nigeria. 2007.

  34. 34.

    Kumar Y, Sharma A, Mani KR. High level of resistance to nalidixic acid in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in Central India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3(06):467–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Geetha V, Yugendran T, Srinivasan R, Harish B. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in typhoidal Salmonellae: a preliminary report from South India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32(1):31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rad M, Kooshan M, Mesgarani H. Quinolone resistance among Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli of animal origin. Comp Clin Pathol. 2012;21(2):161–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Solnik-Isaac H, Weinberger M, Tabak M, Ben-David A, Shachar D, Yaron S. Quinolone resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Virchow isolates from humans and poultry in Israel: evidence for clonal expansion. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2575–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hindi A, Addos S, Ahmed E. Molecularstudy on multidrug resistant of Salmonella enterica isolated from patients with enteric fever in Najaf-Province/Iraq. Int Res J Med Sci. 2014;2(7):12–6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Jin Y, Ling J. Prevalence of integrons in antibiotic-resistant Salmonella spp, Hong Kong. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009;62(6):432–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kang HY, Jeong YS, Oh JY, Tae SH, Choi CH, Moon DC, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(5):639–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kaushik M, Kumar S, Kapoor RK, Virdi JS, Gulati P. Integrons in Enterobacteriaceae: diversity, distribution and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(2):167–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the educational assistance of Arak University of Medical Sciences due to its financial contributions to and support of this study.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Arak University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number 1395.83 and ARAKMU.REC. 93-176-30). The funder had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. This funding is only for purchasing materials in this study. No additional external funding was received for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EGR conceptualized and designed the study. EA were involved in the data collection, generation, and performed data analysis. All authors have read and approved this version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsanollah Ghaznavi-Rad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical approval from the Arak University of Medical Sciences (Numbers: 2137 and 2571). Informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or guardian for participants under 16 years old. A signed consent form was obtained from each patient. There was no access to any information that enabled authors to identify individual patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors stipulate that they have no conflict of interest in regard to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbasi, E., Ghaznavi-Rad, E. Quinolone resistant Salmonella species isolated from pediatric patients with diarrhea in central Iran. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01719-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Salmonella spp.
  • Diarrhea
  • Antibiotic
  • Quinolone resistance
  • Iran