Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Loss of PTEN expression is associated with colorectal cancer liver metastasis and poor patient survival

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Gastroenterology20088:56

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-56

©  Sawai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

  • Received: 30 April 2008
  • Accepted: 26 November 2008
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is an important negative regulator of cell-survival signaling. To evaluate the correlation between PTEN expression and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with and without liver metastases, we investigated PTEN expression in primary colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Methods

Sixty-nine pairs of primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens were analyzed immunohistochemically, and the correlation between immunohistochemical findings and clinicopathological factors was investigated. Seventy primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases were used as controls.

Results

PTEN was strongly expressed in 44 (62.9%) colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases. In contrast, PTEN was weakly expressed in 52 (75.4%) primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients with liver metastases, and was absent in liver metastases. Weak PTEN expression in colorectal cancer tissues was significantly associated with advanced TNM stage (p < 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). PTEN expression was significantly stronger in primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases. Furthermore, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with positive PTEN expression compared to those with negative PTEN expression (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that loss of PTEN expression is involved with colorectal cancer aggressive capacity and that diagnostic evaluation of PTEN expression may provide valuable prognostic information to aid treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients.

Keywords

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Liver Metastasis
  • Colorectal Cancer Patient
  • PTEN Expression
  • Primary Colorectal Cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in Western countries, with liver metastases being the primary cause of death in most patients [1]. Despite improved cancer screening methods and adjuvant treatment regimens for primary colorectal cancer, synchronous and metachronous liver metastases remain a critical problem [2, 3]. Approximately 40% of patients who develop metastatic disease have tumour(s) confined to the liver, which has driven interest in regional therapies that target the liver [4].

An essential process for promotion of metastasis is cancer cell invasion, which is controlled by several biological factors, most notably tumour proliferation and invasion. The tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a critical negative regulator of the cell-survival signaling pathway initiated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) [5–9]. The PI3K-PTEN pathway promotes cell survival and proliferation, increases in cell size, and chemoresistance. Each of these biological outcomes results from the interaction of this pathway with other signaling networks. Further, loss of PTEN expression has been reported to be strongly associated with aggressive tumour features [10–13].

Controlling liver metastasis is considered essential in the treatment of colorectal cancer. It is therefore reasonable to expect that evaluation of PTEN expression levels in primary colorectal cancer and in liver metastases may provide information that will allow better prediction of therapy benefit. The aims of this study were to investigate PTEN expression in primary colorectal cancer and in colorectal cancer liver metastases and to evaluate the correlation between PTEN expression and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with and without liver metastases. Our results suggest that loss of PTEN expression is associated with the aggressive capacity of colorectal cancer and that understanding the biologic mechanisms responsible for regulation of PTEN expression may enable better translational treatment of colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

Sixty-nine pairs of primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens were analyzed in this study. Seventy primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastasis were used as controls. All tissues were obtained in the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Hospital with informed consent from patients or their relatives. Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin and subsequently embedded in paraffin.

Immunohistochemistry

Resected colorectal cancer and paired liver metastasis tissue specimens were sliced into 3.5-μm-thick sections and deparaffinized in five min. After blocking nonspecific binding with 10% bovine serum (Wako, Osaka, Japan), sections were incubated with anti-PTEN antibodies (clone 28H6; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 1:300 dilution for 60 min at room temperature. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the peroxidase-based EnVision™ kit (DakoCytomation, Copenhagen, Denmark) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Negative control sections were prepared using normal mouse IgG instead of primary antibody.

Immunohistochemical evaluation

Two observers (H.Ta. and H.S.) independently evaluated the immunohistochemical staining results. The concordance ratio was >90%. Differences of opinion were resolved by reaching a consensus with the assistance of a third evaluator (H.Tb.). The intensity of tissue staining was graded semiquantitatively on a 4-point scale (-, +, ++, and +++). Likewise, the proportion of cells stained was assessed on a 4-point scale (1, 0–15%; 2, 15–50%; 3, 50–85%; 4, 85–100% cells stained). Tissues were classified into strongly staining (Group S) and weakly staining (Group W) groups according to the intensity and proportion of immunohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemical staining of intensity more than +++ or a staining area > 3 was classified as Group S, the intensity less than ++ and a staining area < 2 was classified as Group W.

Statistical analysis

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics. Differences between Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression were tested with the Wilcoxon test. Statistical significance was indicated by p < 0.05 or 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.).

Results

Clinicopathological findings of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis

Sixty-nine pairs of primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens were evaluated (Table 1). The mean age of all patients was 60.7 ± 9.9 years. pT, pN, and pM categories were determined according to the TNM classification [14]. The M category was determined from preoperative imaging findings, intraoperative findings, and postoperative imaging findings. A total of 23 patients had synchronous liver metastases and 46 had metachronous metastases; 38 patients had solitary liver metastases and 31 patients had multiple (≥ 2) metastases. Some patients received postoperative treatment; however, there was no difference in outcome between the various treatment modalities. The median follow-up time for patients at the time of survival analysis was 35.5 months after primary surgery. The actuarial 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases was 34.3%.
Table 1

Comparison of clinicopathological findings by existence of liver metastases

  

Patients with liver metastases n = 69 (cases)

Patients without liver metastases n = 70 (cases)

pvalue

Gender

M/F

40/29

38/32

N.S.

Age

Years

60.7 ± 9.9

62.5 ± 10.1

N.S.

TNM stage

I/II/III/IV

0/12/23/34

11/38/21/0

< 0.01a

Tumour site

C/R

45/24

49/21

N.S.

LN mets

Yes/No

41/28

31/39

N.S.

Differentiation

w/mod/por

37/30/2

21/33/16

N.S.

Liver mets

Sync/Meta

23/46

N.A.

N.A.

No. of liver mets

Solo/Multi

38/31

N.A.

N.A.

PTEN expression

S/W

17/52

44/26

< 0.01a

Median follow-up

Months

35.5 ± 27.4

37.2 ± 39.9

N.S.

5-year survival

(%)

34.3

79.2

< 0.01b

LN, lymph node; mets, metastasis; M, male; F, female; C, colon; R, rectum; w, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; mod, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sync, synchronous metastasis; Meta, metachronous metastasis; Solo, solitary metastasis; Multi, multiple metastases; S, strong; W, weak; N.A., not applicable; N.S., not significant. The a p-values were obtained using the Mann-Whiteny U test. The b p-values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression tested with the Wilcoxon test. Values of age are given mean ± s.d. N.S., not significant.

Immunohistochemical localization of PTEN in colorectal cancer and liver metastasis specimens

PTEN expression was evaluated in primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens. PTEN was strongly expressed in 44 (62.9%) colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases (control, n = 70). In contrast, weak PTEN expression was observed in 52 (75.4%) primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients with liver metastases, and PTEN expression was absent in liver metastasis cancer specimens (Figure 1A–D). The marked nuclear staining of PTEN and slight cytoplasmic staining were observed. Weak PTEN expression was significantly associated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis (Table 2). The actuarial 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases and positive PTEN expression was 64.4%. In contrast, the actuarial 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases and negative PTEN expression was 12.7% (Figure 2). In addition, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, there was a significant difference in 5-year survival rate between patients with positive PTEN expression and those with negative PTEN expression (p = 0.012).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Expression of PTEN in colon cancer specimens. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a monoclonal anti-PTEN antibody (A, C) or negative control antibody (B) on a section sequential to that used in (A). (A) Strong PTEN expression in a representative moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma specimen from colon cancer patients without associated liver metastasis (×100). (C) Expression of PTEN is not observed in a representative moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma specimen from colon cancer patients with liver metastasis (×100). (D) Expression of PTEN is not observed in a specimen from metastatic liver tumor, in contrast, PTEN expression is observed in normal liver tissue (×100).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. A comparison of survival curves between cases with (thick line) and without (broken line) strong PTEN expression.

Table 2

Comparison of clinicopathological findings by PTEN expression

  

PTEN expression

  

Group S (n = 17)

Group W (n = 52)

pvalue

Gender

M/F

10/7

30/22

N.S.

Age

Year

60.3 ± 9.7

60.9 ± 10.1

N.S.

TNM stage

I/II/III/IV

0/6/7/4

0/6/16/30

< 0.01a

Tumour site

C/R

11/6

34/18

N.S.

LN mets

Yes/No

8/9

39/13

< 0.05a

Differentiation

w/mod/por

10/7/0

27/23/2

N.S.

Liver mets

Sync/Meta

4/13

19/33

N.S.

No. of liver mets

Solo/Multi

9/8

29/23

N.S.

5-year survival

(%)

64.4

12.7

< 0.05b

LN, lymph node; mets, metastasis; M, male; F, female; C, colon; R, rectum; w, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; mod, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sync, synchronous metastasis; Meta, metachronous metastasis, Solo, solitary metastasis; Multi, multiple metastases; N.S., not significant. The a p-values were obtained using the Mann-Whiteny U test. The b p-values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression tested with the Wilcoxon test. Values of age are given mean ± s.d. N.S., not significant.

Discussion

PTEN is a potent tumour suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in a large number of human cancers, including brain, endometrial, prostate, and kidney cancer. PTEN downregulates the activity of the lipid second messenger phosphoinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) through dephosphorylation, thereby negatively regulating PI3K-triggered signaling. The PI3K/Akt pathway is an important driver of cell proliferation and survival, most notably in cells responding to growth factor receptor engagement. Survival signals such as growth factors, cytokines, and hormones are known to activate PI3K [15]. Subsequently, PI3K activates Akt/PKB, which interferes with cellular apoptotic machinery [16]. Activated Akt/PKB mediates cell survival via the regulation of numerous proteins involved in apoptosis, such as the transcription factor NF-κB [17]. Akt-triggered survival signaling is suppressed by PTEN antagonization of PI3K activity.

PI3K and Akt are overexpressed in a variety of cancers [18, 19], while PTEN is frequently deleted in advanced tumours [20, 21]. These alterations lead to constitutively active survival signaling that enhances the insensitivity of tumour cells to apoptosis induction. Via PI3K antagonism, PTEN functions as a tumour suppressor. Thus, the PI3K-PTEN signaling network is crucial to proper regulation of cell survival. By reducing PI3K activity, PTEN inhibits the recruitment of Akt to the plasma membrane and prevents its activation. PTEN function is regulated by post-translational modification, cellular localization, and redox modulation of its active-site cysteine [22, 23]. When PTEN is deleted, mutated, or otherwise inactivated, activation of PI3K effectors – particularly the key survival kinase Akt/PKB – can occur in the absence of any exogenous stimuli, allowing tumourigenesis to be initiated.

The molecular mechanisms by which PTEN controls stem cell behavior are currently unknown. Previously, PTEN loss has been reported to lead to an increase in self-renewal and proliferation in neural stem cells [24], at least in part, by modulating the G0 to G1 cell cycle transition, a critical step for stem cell self-renewal and differentiation [25]. Studies of mouse embryonic fibroblasts and B lymphocytes lacking the PTEN gene have demonstrated that these cells migrate faster than their wild-type counterparts in culture, indicating a physiological role for PTEN in the suppression of cell motility [26, 27]. Re-introduction of PTEN into mammalian cells lacking the enzyme inhibits the motility of several cell lineages, including mouse embryo fibroblasts and tumour-derived cells of glial, prostate, and T cell origin [25, 27–30]; however, the majority of these studies have not addressed the biologic mechanism of PTEN action.

Numerous tumour types, including sporadic tumours and those that arise in association with a cancer predisposition syndrome, demonstrate either absent or altered PTEN expression [31]. Recent reports demonstrated the relationship between PTEN expression and the efficacy of cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [32–34]. Frattini et al reported the loss of PTEN expression is observed in 40 % of primary colorectal cancer patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic lesion and the loss of PTEN protein expression is associated with nonresponsiveness to cetuximab [32]. They also demonstrated a trend toward PTEN protein reduction in mucinous colorectal cancers, compared with well-differentiated tumors. In this study, we investigated PTEN expression in primary colorectal cancer and in colorectal cancer liver metastases and evaluated the correlation between PTEN expression and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with and without liver metastases. In our immunohistochemical analysis, strong PTEN expression was observed in 62.9% of primary colorectal cancer specimens obtained from patients without liver metastases, while weak PTEN expression was observed in 75.4% of colorectal cancer specimens obtained from patients with liver metastases. In addition, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, we found that weak PTEN expression was significantly associated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, a significant difference in 5-year survival rate was observed between patients with positive PTEN expression and those with negative PTEN expression. This is the first report to demonstrate an association between poor prognosis and PTEN expression in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that weak PTEN expression is significantly associated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. This is the first report to demonstrate a significant difference in 5-year survival rate between patients with positive PTEN expression and those with negative PTEN expression among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. These observations suggest that diagnostic evaluation of PTEN expression might provide valuable prognostic information to aid treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients.

List of abbreviations

PTEN: 

phosphatase and tensin homolog

PI3K: 

phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PIP3: 

phosphoinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate

EGFR: 

epidermal growth factor receptor.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

All tissues were obtained in the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Hospital with informed consent of patients or their relatives.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 4678601, Japan

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007, 57: 43-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vibert E, Canedo L, Adam R: Strategies to treat primary unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Semin Oncol. 2005, 32: 33-39. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.07.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mehdi K, Christophe P, Mohamed AH, Emmanuel M, Stephane B, Brigitte F, Philippe R, Bernard N: Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2006, 243: 1-7. 10.1097/01.sla.0000193603.26265.c3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chong G, Cunningham D: Improving long-term outcomes for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 9063-9066. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stambolic V, Suzuki A, de la Pompa JL, Brothers GM, Mirtsos C, Sasaki T, Ruland J, Penninger JM, Siderovski DP, Mak TW: Negative regulation of PKB/AKT-dependent cell survival by tumor suppressor PTEN. Cell. 1998, 95: 29-39. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81780-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomas GV, Horvath S, Smith BL, Crosby K, Lebel LA, Schrage M, Said J, De Kernion J, Reither RE, Sawyers CL: Antibody-based profiling of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in clinical prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 8351-8356. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Asano T, Yao Y, Zhu J, Li D, Abbruzzese JL, Reddy SAG: The PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway is activated due to aberrant Pten expression and targets transcription factors NF-κB and c-Myc in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 8571-8580. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stoll V, Calleja V, Vassaux G, Downward J, Lemoine NR: Dominant negative inhibitors of signaling through the phosphoinositol 3-kinase pathway for gene therapy of pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2005, 54: 109-116. 10.1136/gut.2004.046706.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cully M, You H, Levine AJ, Mak TW: Beyond PTEN mutations: the PI3K pathway as an integrator of multiple inputs during tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 184-192. 10.1038/nrc1819.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Okumura K, Zhao M, Depinho RA, Furnari FB, Cavenee WK: Cellular transformation by the MSP58 oncogene is inhibited by its physical interaction with the PTEN tumor suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 2703-2706. 10.1073/pnas.0409370102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Stanger BZ, Stiles B, Lauwers GY, Bardeesy N, Mendoza M, Wang Y, Greenwood A, Cheng KH, McLaughlin M, Brown D, Depinho RA, Wu H, Melton DA, Dor Y: Pten constrains centroacinar cell expansion and malignant transformation in the pancreas. Cancer Cell. 2005, 8: 185-195. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.07.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang S, Garcia AJ, Wu M, Lawson DA, Witte ON, Wu H: Pten deletion leads to the expansion of a prostatic stem/progenitor cell subpopulation and tumor initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 1480-1485. 10.1073/pnas.0510652103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Mulholland DJ, Dedhar S, Wu H, Nelson CC: PTEN and GSK3β: key regulators of progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 329-337. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch: UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 2002, Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons, 6Google Scholar
  15. Datta SR, Brunet A, Greenberg ME: Cellular survival: a play in three Akts. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 2905-2927. 10.1101/gad.13.22.2905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Burgering BM, Coffer PJ: Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction. Nature. 1995, 376: 599-602. 10.1038/376599a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones RG, Saibil SD, Pun JM, Elford AR, Bonnard M, Pellegrini M, Arya S, Parsons ME, Krawczyk CM, Gerondakis S, et al: NF-kappaB couples protein kinase B/Akt signaling to distinct survival pathways and the regulation of lymphocyte homeostasis in vivo. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 3790-3799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng JQ, Godwin AK, Bellacosa A, Taguchi T, Franke TF, Hamilton TC, Tsichlis PN, Testa JR: AKT2, a putative oncogene encoding a member of a subfamily of protein-serine/threonine kinases, is amplified in human ovarian carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 9267-9271. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9267.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Boehle AS, Kurdow R, Boenicke L, Schniewind B, Faendrich F, Dohrmann P, Kalthoff H: Wortmannin inhibits growth of human non-small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002, 387: 234-239. 10.1007/s00423-002-0314-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Podsypanina K, Ellenson LH, Nemes A, Gu J, Tamura M, Yamada KM, Cordon-Cardo C, Catoretti G, Fisher PE, Parsons R: Mutation of Pten/Mmac1 in mice causes neoplasia in multiple organ systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 1563-1568. 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1563.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Suzuki A, de la Pompa JL, Stambolic V, Elia AJ, Sasaki T, del Barco Barrantes I, Ho A, Wakeham A, Itie A, Khoo W, et al: High cancer susceptibility and embryonic lethality associated with mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in mice. Curr Biol. 1998, 8: 1169-1178. 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00488-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee SR, Yang KS, Kwon J, Lee C, Jeong W, Rhee SG: Reversible inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by H2O2. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 20336-20342. 10.1074/jbc.M111899200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gericke A, Munson M, Ross AH: Regulation of the PTEN phosphatase. Gene. 2006, 374: 1-9. 10.1016/j.gene.2006.02.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, Lesche R, Trumpp A, Zack JA, Kornblum HI, Liu X, Wu H: Negative regulation of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by the Pten tumor suppressor gene in vivo. Science. 2001, 294: 2186-2189. 10.1126/science.1065518.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, Dougherty J, LeBelle J, Zack J, Geschwind D, Liu X, Kornblum H, Wu H: PTEN negatively regulates neural stem cell self-renewal by modulating G0–G1 cell cycle entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 111-116. 10.1073/pnas.0509939103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liliental J, Moon SY, Lesche R, Mamillapalli R, Li D, Zheng Y, Sun H, Wu H: Genetic deletion of the Pten tumor suppressor gene promotes cell motility by activation of Rac1 and Cdc42 GTPases. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 401-404. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00417-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Suzuki A, Kaisho T, Ohishi M, Tsukio-Yamaguchi M, Tsubata T, Koni PA, Sasaki T, Mak TW, Nakano T: Critical roles of Pten in B cell homeostasis and immunoglobulin class switch recombination. J Exp Med. 2003, 197: 657-667. 10.1084/jem.20021101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Tamura M, Gu J, Matsumoto K, Aota S, Parsons R, Yamada KM: Inhibition of cell migration, spreading, and focal adhesions by tumor suppressor PTEN. Science. 1998, 280: 1614-1617. 10.1126/science.280.5369.1614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lacalle RA, Gomez-Mouton C, Barber DF, Jimenez-Baranda S, Mira E, Martinez AC, Carrera AC, Manes S: PTEN regulates motility but not directionality during leukocyte chemotaxis. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 6207-6215. 10.1242/jcs.01545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanchez T, Thangada S, Wu MT, Kontos CD, Wu D, Wu H, Hla T: PTEN as an effector in the signaling of antimigratory G protein-coupled receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 4312-4317. 10.1073/pnas.0409784102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Eng C: PTEN: one gene, many syndromes. Hum Mutat. 2003, 22: 183-198. 10.1002/humu.10257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Frattini M, Signoroni S, Pilotti S, Bertario L, Benvenuti S, Zanon C, Bardelli A, Pierotti MA: Phosphatase protein homologue to tensin expression and phosphatidylinositol-3 phosphate kinase mutations in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 11227-10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Frattini M, Saletti P, Romagnani E, Martin V, Molinari F, Ghisletta M, Camponovo A, Etienne LL, Cavalli F, Mazzucchelli L: PTEN loss of expression predicts cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cance. 2007, 97: 1139-1145. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Jhawer M, Goel S, Wilson AJ, Montagna C, Ling YH, Byun DS, Nasser S, Arango D, Shin J, Klampfer L, Augenlicht LH, Soler RP, Mariadason JM: PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 1953-1961. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5659.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

    35. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/8/56/prepub

Copyright

© Sawai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us