Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Gastroenterology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A low level of serum total testosterone is independently associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

  • Sunmi Kim1,
  • Hyuktae Kwon2Email author,
  • Jin-Ho Park3,
  • Belong Cho3,
  • Donghee Kim4,
  • Seung-Won Oh2,
  • Cheol Min Lee2 and
  • Ho-Chun Choi3
BMC Gastroenterology201212:69

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-69

Received: 27 December 2011

Accepted: 12 June 2012

Published: 12 June 2012

Abstract

Background

The association between low serum testosterone levels, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and metabolic syndrome is now well known. However, the relationship between hepatic steatosis and serum testosterone levels has not been extensively studied. Our aim was to investigate the association of serum total testosterone levels with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), adjusting for the influence of VAT and insulin resistance.

Methods

This study is a retrospective observational cross-sectional one of healthy Korean men and was conducted at the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center. We used data obtained from 495 men who were at least 20 years of age and who had undergone blood testing, abdominal computed tomography, and ultrasonography. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association of serum total testosterone levels with NAFLD.

Results

Men in the low serum testosterone quintile were at a higher risk for NAFLD than men in the highest serum testosterone quintile. After adjusting for age, smoking, diabetes, exercise, BMI, triglycerides, and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, subjects with serum testosterone levels in the lowest quintile had an odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 5.12 (2.43–10.77) for NAFLD (p value, 0.0004). The inverse association between serum testosterone and NAFLD was attenuated by further adjustment for variables including VAT; however, it remained statistically significant (OR (95% CI): 4.52 (2.09–9.80) in the lowest quintile; p value=0.004).

Conclusions

A low serum total testosterone level was independently associated with NAFLD. This report is the first one suggesting the association remains unchanged even after controlling for VAT and insulin resistance.

Keywords

Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseTotal testosteroneVisceral adipose tissue

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease in South Korea [1] as well as in North America and Europe, where the prevalence of NAFLD is reported to be up to 30% in the general population [2, 3]. NAFLD has been found to be closely related to abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, all of which are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [46]. Furthermore, several recently published prospective studies have shown that NAFLD is an independent risk factor for CVD [711]. Insulin resistance is regarded as the major factor contributing to the pathogenesis of NAFLD [12]; moreover, NAFLD has been reported to be a very early and sensitive indicator of insulin resistance [13, 14]. Similarly, increased visceral adipose tissue (VAT), which induces insulin resistance and plays a key role in the development of metabolic syndrome, has been well established as a major risk factor for NAFLD [15, 16].

Numerous studies have shown that low serum testosterone levels in men are associated with an increased risk of obesity, abdominal obesity, and metabolic syndrome [1720]. The inverse association between serum testosterone levels and metabolic syndrome is often explained by VAT accumulation and insulin resistance [19, 2123]. Testosterone exerts contrasting influences on muscle and VAT by affecting the commitment of pluripotent stem cells and by suppressing the growth of preadipocytes [19]. Based on the inverse correlation of VAT, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance to serum testosterone levels [19, 2123], one expects a similar relation between hepatic steatosis and serum testosterone levels; however, this potential relationship has not been extensively investigated. In an early study, 10 patients with hepatic steatosis were reported to have lower serum testosterone levels than reference subjects of the same age [24]. A German study found that men with low serum testosterone levels were at a higher risk of hepatic steatosis than men with high serum testosterone levels [25]. Recently, a study that investigated a cohort of 117 men showed that raising serum testosterone concentrations to normal levels by treatment with parenteral testosterone for 1 year improved the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), as well as weight, body mass index (BMI), waist size, and lipid profiles [26]. Low serum testosterone levels are thus closely related with VAT accumulation and insulin resistance [17, 22], both of which are known to play important roles in the pathogenesis and prognosis of NAFLD [15]. We hypothesized that the testosterone level would be associated with NAFLD and that VAT might have a confounding effect on their association. In the present study, our aim was to investigate the association of serum total testosterone levels with NAFLD after adjusting for the influence of VAT and insulin resistance.

Methods

Participants and study design

This study is a retrospective observational cross-sectional one of healthy Korean men who were aged 20 years or more and who voluntarily visited the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center between January 2008 and April 2010 for routine health checkups. Study data were obtained using questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, blood samples, abdominal computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography. Among 28,670 examinees, those with missing data on key variables (1,298 examinees who had not undergone abdominal ultrasonography; 21,425, abdominal CT scans; 4890, serum total testosterone determination) were excluded from the study. We included only the remaining 1057 men who underwent an examination of serum total testosterone, abdominal ultrasonography, and abdominal CT scans of their own accord, which was necessarily a convenience sample. All examinees routinely took serology tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV). Of the remaining 1057 men, 77 subjects were excluded on the grounds of HBsAg or anti-HCV positivity. By using self-report questionnaires, we also excluded 433 men who consumed more than 140 g of alcohol per week, had a medical history of other types of hepatitis such as autoimmune hepatitis and chronic viral liver disease, cholestasis, and other metabolic liver diseases, or had previously used steatogenic medications including antiretroviral drugs, antiarrhythmic drugs, anticancer drugs, corticosteroids and hormone.

In addition, 52 subjects were excluded because of missing data on key variables such as smoking, medical history of diabetes, and physical activity. The final analysis included 495 men. Among the participants included, there were no subjects who had the evidence of hepatic cirrhosis or portal hypertension (such as splenomegaly and esophageal varix) on ultrasonography, abdominal CT or gastroscopy. This study protocol was approved by the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Measurements

Abdominal ultrasonography

The diagnosis of NAFLD was based on abdominal ultrasonography (Acuson, Sequoia 512; Siemens, Mountain View, CA) performed by experienced radiologists blinded to the medical information and the laboratory parameters of the participants. Fatty infiltration of the liver was diagnosed if hepatorenal contrast and liver brightness were detected [27]. The subjects thus identified as having a fatty liver in the absence of other potential causes of hepatitis such as excessive alcohol consumption (>140 g/week) were diagnosed with NAFLD [28, 29].

Serum total testosterone

Blood samples for the measurement of serum total testosterone were collected via venipuncture performed between 8:00 and 11:00 AM. Serum total testosterone was measured using the Coat-A-Count total testosterone kit (Siemens Diagnostics Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA). The Coat-A-Count procedure is a solid-phase radioimmunoassay that uses a testosterone-specific antibody-coated polypropylene tube and reports results within the range of 0.04–16 ng/mL.

Other clinical and laboratory assessments

Medical history and life style, including information on liver disease, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, and exercise, were documented using self-report questionnaires. We surveyed the average frequency and amount of alcohol consumption per week. Anthropometric data were measured by trained personnel, who used a standardized protocol and instruments. Height and body weight were measured using a digital scale, and BMI (kg/m2) was calculated. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest [30]. Laboratory examinations included determination of AST, ALT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), total cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG) levels. Venous blood samples were taken from all examinees between 8:00 and 11:00 AM after a minimum 14-h overnight fast. All biochemical determinations were conducted in the same laboratory with standard methods. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was used as an indicator of insulin resistance and was defined as follows: fasting insulin (μIU/mL) × fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)/22.5 [31]. Data on adipose tissue area were acquired through use of the CT cross-sectional scan, a validated procedure that has been demonstrated to show very low interobserver variation [32, 33]. The subjects underwent abdominal CT with a 16-detector row CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 16; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) in the supine position. A 5-mm-thick slice obtained at the level of the umbilicus with a 0.5-s scan time was used to calculate abdominal fat compartments by means of CT (Rapidia 2.8; INFINITT, Seoul, Korea). VAT was defined as intraperitoneal fat bounded by the parietal peritoneum or transversalis fascia, excluding the vertebral column and paraspinal muscles, organs, blood vessels, and bowels.

Statistical analysis

The general characteristics of the participants grouped according to the presence of NAFLD were compared using the Student’s t-test, the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Pearson’s Chi-squared test. We constructed 3 models and used the multiple logistic regression to explore the association of serum total testosterone with NAFLD, after adjusting for variables such as age, diabetes, smoking, exercise, BMI, VAT, HOMA-IR, and hs-CRP. The statistical significance of the nonlinear effects of independent variables was tested by the likelihood ratio test in the logistic regression models. Multicollinearity was assessed using the variance inflation factors (VIFs) [34]. A large proportion of our study subjects had normal serum total testosterone levels over 3 ng/mL. Therefore, we additionally analyzed the association between NAFLD and serum total testosterone in the subgroup of 413 subjects with normal serum total testosterone levels [35]. The statistical analyses were performed using STATA, version 10.0. and R version 2.12.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Statistical significance was defined by a two-tailed p-value of <0.05.

Results

General characteristics of the study subjects

NAFLD was found in 251 subjects (50.71%). Men with NAFLD showed lower testosterone levels (3.94 ng/mL vs. 4.83 ng/mL) and more unfavorable metabolic profiles. The mean VAT in the NAFLD group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAFLD group (164.79 cm2 vs. 106.74 cm2). The NAFLD group had higher proportions of diabetics (27.09% vs. 12.30%), and elevated FBS levels (101 mg/dL vs. 96 mg/dL). The NAFLD group also showed significantly higher hs-CRP (0.09 mg/dL vs. 0.04 mg/dL) and HOMA-IR (2.67 mg/dL vs 1.76 mg/dL) than the non-NAFLD group. Further characteristics of study subjects with and without NAFLD are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

General characteristics of study subjects categorized by the presence of NAFLD

 

no NAFLD (n = 244)

NAFLD (n = 251)

p value

Age *

54.98 (10.22)

53.85 (9.83)

0.2118

Total testosterone (ng/mL)

4.83 (3.73–5.96)

3.94 (3.10–4.85)

< 0.0001

Smoking †

  

0.310

non-smoker

72 (29.51)

59 (23.51)

 

ex-smoker

110 (45.08)

125 (49.8)

 

current smoker

62 (25.41)

67 (26.69)

 

drinking amount (g/week)

21.04 (0–71.01)

8.53 (0–59.7)

0.0595

Exercise †

  

0.013

yes

193 (79.1)

174 (69.32)

 

WC (cm)

85 (81–89.9)

91.5 (88–95.5)

< 0.0001

BMI (kg/m2)

23.56 (22.13–25.10)

26.14 (24.38–27.78)

< 0.0001

VAT (cm2)

106.74 (80.62–142.86)

164.79 (135.97–197.95)

< 0.0001

Diabetes †

  

< 0.001

yes

30 (12.30)

68 (27.09)

 

FBS (mg/dL)

96 (90–103)

101 (93–114)

< 0.0001

SBP (mmHg) *

118.97 (13.02)

122.44 (13.86)

0.0043

DBP (mmHg) *

79.15 (9.81)

80.83 (10.94)

0.0734

total cholesterol (mg/dL) *

196.27 (34.46)

199.79 (37.10)

0.2747

TGs (mg/dL)

95 (71–130)

140 (99–195)

< 0.0001

HDL-C (mg/dL)

51 (44–59)

44 (40–51)

< 0.0001

LDL-C (mg/dL) *

125.51 (33.43)

130.18 (33.26)

0.1198

Total bilirubin (mg/dL)

1.1 (0.85–1.3)

1.1 (0.9–1.3)

0.687

ALP (IU/L)

59 (49.5–69)

62 (52–72)

0.018

AST (IU/L)

22 (19–27)

26 (22–33)

< 0.0001

ALT (IU/L)

22 (17–30)

33 (24–49)

< 0.0001

γ-GT (IU/L)

27 (20–39)

34 (26–49)

< 0.0001

hs-CRP (mg/dL)

0.04 (0.04–0.15)

0.09 (0.03–0.2)

0.0001

HOMA-IR (mg/dL)

1.76 (1.33–2.29)

2.67 (1.96–3.48)

0.0001

Metabolic syndrome †

  

< 0.001

yes

41 (16.80)

130 (51.79)

 

a Data for continuous variables without a normal distribution are presented as the median (range, Quartile 25–Q75) and were tested by the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

b Data for continuous variables with a normal distribution are shown as the mean (± standard deviation) and were tested by the Student’s t-test.

c In the case of categorized variables, the number (n) and proportion (%) of subjects were tested by the Pearson’s Chi-square test.

* Mean (± standard deviation).

† the number (n) and proportion (%) of subjects.

WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TGs, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.

NAFLD and serum testosterone levels

In both high- (VAT ≥ 100 cm2) and low- (VAT < 100 cm2) VAT groups, the mean age-adjusted prevalence of NAFLD decreased as the serum testosterone level increased from the 1st quintile to the 5th quintile (Figure 1). The association between serum total testosterone levels and NAFLD was examined by employing multiple logistic regression analysis with potential confounding variables such as age, smoking, diabetes, exercise, BMI, TGs, HDL-C, HOMA-IR, hs-CRP, and VAT controlled. An inverse relationship between serum total testosterone levels and NAFLD was shown in all models (p value: 0.0004 in model 1, 0.0006 in model 2, and 0.004 in model 3) (Table 2). As the serum testosterone level decreased from the 5th quintile to the 1st quintile, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for NAFLD increased. The OR and 95% CI values in the 1st quintile were 5.12 (CI, 2.43–10.77) in model 1, 4.99 (2.36–10.57) in model 2, and 4.52 (2.09–9.80) in model 3. A linear trend was seen in all models (p value for the trend < 0.001 for all models). Although the association was slightly attenuated in models 2 and 3 compared to those in model 1, the statistical significance of the association between serum total testosterone level and NAFLD persisted. The correlation coefficients between VAT and BMI, TGs, HDL-C, HOMA-IR, and hs-CRP were 0.653, 0.300, -0.312, 0.205, and 0.147, respectively. However, the VIFs for independent variables in all models in Table 2 were lower than 2.1. Therefore, no evidence of a serious multicollinearity effect was present. Similar results were observed in the subgroup analysis conducted with 413 subjects who had normal serum testosterone levels (≥3 ng/mL). An inverse association between serum total testosterone levels and NAFLD was also shown in all models (p value: 0.0036 in model 1, 0.0044 in model 2, and 0.0292 in model 3). All models showed a linear trend (p value for the trend: 0.001 in model 1 and model 2; 0.004 in model 3) Additional file 1: Table S1.
Figure 1

Age-adjusted prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by serum testosterone levels (stratified by VAT) a the range of serum testosterone quintiles (ng/mL): 1st quintile (0.11–3.17), 2nd quintile (3.18–3.88), 3rd quintile (3.92–4.78), 4th quintile (4.8–5.7), and 5th quintile (5.71–13.43) VAT, visceral adipose tissue.

Table 2

The association between NAFLD and serum testosterone levels in the 495 subjects included in the study

 

Model 1*

Model 2†

Model 3‡

Total testosterone (ng/mL)

OR (95% CI)

p value

OR (95% CI)

p value

OR (95% CI)

p value

1st quintile (0.11–3.17),

5.12 (2.43–10.77)

0.0004

4.99 (2.36–10.57)

0.0006

4.52 (2.09–9.80)

0.0040

2nd quintile (3.18–3.88)

2.62 (1.28–5.38)

2.48 (1.20–5.12)

2.31 (1.09–4.88)

3rd quintile (3.92–4.78)

3.39 (1.68–6.84)

3.33 (1.65–6.75)

2.72 (1.31–5.65)

4th quintile (4.80–5.70)

2.30 (1.12–4.70)

2.22 (1.09–4.57)

2.01 (0.96–4.23)

5th quintile (5.71–13.43)

1

1

1

p for the trend

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 

a Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the associations between NAFLD and serum total testosterone levels.

b p value: tested by the Wald test.

* Model 1: adjusted for age, smoking, diabetes, exercise, BMI, TGs, and HDL-C.

† Model 2: Model 1 + HOMA-IR and hs-CRP.

‡ Model 3: Model 2 + VAT (as the continuous variable).

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

In this study, we found that low levels of serum total testosterone was independently associated with NAFLD among apparently healthy Korean men. This inverse association between serum testosterone and NAFLD persisted even after controlling for the effect of VAT, insulin resistance (as HOMA-IR), and low-grade inflammation (as hs-CRP), which are considered as possible links between testosterone and NAFLD.

Few studies have investigated the association between testosterone and fatty liver, and even fewer have addressed the potential relation between testosterone and NAFLD. A case–control study on men with chronic alcoholism suggested no association between serum testosterone and fatty liver [36], but this study included only 20 cases and 20 age-matched controls, with the study population consisting of chronic alcoholics. By contrast, a recent large observational study on 1912 German men showed an inverse association between hepatic steatosis and serum testosterone levels [25], a finding consistent with that in our study.

The mechanisms underlying the association between testosterone and NAFLD are still largely unclear. One possible explanation is the accumulation of VAT and subsequent insulin resistance among men with low serum testosterone. Men with testosterone levels in the lower range are well known to have an increased risk of VAT accumulation, which in turn is related to higher insulin resistance [17, 22, 37]. Excess VAT results in exposure of the liver to higher amounts of free fatty acids, which lead to hepatic insulin resistance and ultimately to systemic insulin resistance [38], and which are involved in the pathogenesis and prognosis of NAFLD [15, 16]. There is also evidence that testosterone directly improves insulin sensitivity [39]. Research conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital concluded that impaired Leydig cell function is directly associated with insulin resistance in men [39]. These findings led to the assumption that the association between low serum total testosterone levels and NAFLD might be mediated by the effect of VAT and insulin resistance. In the same context, the attenuation of the association between serum testosterone and NAFLD after adjusting for VAT and HOMA-IR suggests that VAT and insulin resistance may partially influence the pathway between testosterone and NAFLD.

Low-grade inflammation could be another possible link between testosterone and NAFLD. The chronic inflammatory state is fundamental to the progression of NAFLD [40, 41]. Low serum testosterone is associated with markers of inflammation [4244], and testosterone replacement therapy in men has been observed to have an anti-inflammatory effect, with a reduction in TNF-α, IL-1b, and sIL-6r levels and an increase in IL-10 and hs-CRP levels [1, 26, 42, 45, 46].

Testosterone may also influence microRNAs (miRNAs) in the liver or the activity of hepatic lipase [6, 44, 47]. Recent studies provide evidence that miRNAs are abundant in the liver and modulate a diverse spectrum of liver functions [6]. Moreover, deregulation of miRNA expression may be a key pathogenetic factor in many liver diseases [6]. Testosterone has been reported to potentially regulate miRNAs in the mouse liver [44], but the molecular mechanisms underlying transcriptional regulation of miRNA genes in the liver remain largely unknown [6]. A study reported that the activity of hormone-sensitive lipase is affected by testosterone in the adipose tissue and heart of the male rat [47]. These observations have only been reported in animals; hence, we could not establish definite conclusions. Further studies are necessary to uncover new mechanisms linking testosterone and NAFLD.

Our study had some limitations. First, we used ultrasonography, which cannot identify fatty infiltration below 30%, as the mode of diagnosis. While liver biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for detecting hepatic steatosis [2], liver biopsy was not feasible in the case of this population-based study. Ultrasonography is the diagnostic test of choice for NAFLD, because it is noninvasive, safe, sensitive (up to 93%), and specific (up to 89%) in terms of identifying fatty infiltration [48]. Its clinical efficacy in this regard has also been proven, since a recent study on Koreans showed that ultrasonography-diagnosed NAFLD acts as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease [11]. Second, although we checked the medical history of liver disease and previous use of steatogenic drugs through the self-report questionnaires, it was possible that rare liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis and Wilson’s disease and fatty liver disease caused by steatogenic drugs were not completely excluded considering the recall bias of self-report questionnaires. Third, only serum total testosterone was used to assess testosterone levels because of the absence of available data on free testosterone and sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Fourth, the use of a convenience sample and a cross-sectional design limited the drawing of conclusions on causality. Fifth, the findings are restricted by sex because only men were used in this study. Since testosterone plays a role in energy metabolism in females as well, the role of this hormone in female NAFLD will also need to be examined. Despite these limitations, the contribution of this study is that it is the first one to identify the association of testosterone with NAFLD after adjusting for the effect of VAT and insulin resistance. Further longitudinal cohort studies are needed to verify the causal relationship between NAFLD and total serum testosterone levels, and well-designed randomized clinical trials could show whether testosterone replacement therapy can improve NAFLD.

Conclusions

In conclusion this study shows that low levels of serum total testosterone was independently associated with NAFLD. This inverse association was independent of the effect of VAT, insulin resistance (as HOMA-IR), and low-grade inflammation (as hs-CRP).

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

Abbreviations

NAFLD: 

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

VAT: 

Visceral adipose tissue

BMI: 

Body mass index

CT: 

Computed tomography

HBsAg: 

Hepatitis B surface antigen

Anti-HCV: 

Hepatitis C antibody

WC: 

Waist circumference

AST: 

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT: 

Alanine aminotransferase

γ-GT: 

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

ALP: 

Alkaline phosphatase

HbA1c: 

Glycosylated hemoglobin

TGs: 

Triglycerides

HDL-C: 

High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol

HOMA-IR: 

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

hs-CRP: 

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

OR: 

Odds ratio

VIFs: 

Variance inflation factors.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Seung Sik Hwang, Associate Professor at Inha University, for advising us on statistical analysis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital
(2)
Department of Family Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center
(3)
Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
(4)
Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center

References

  1. Park SH: Current status of liver disease in Korea: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Korean J Hepatol. 2009, 15: S34-10.3350/kjhep.2009.15.S6.S34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angulo P: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 1221-1231. 10.1056/NEJMra011775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chitturi S, Wong VW-S, Farrell G: Nonalcoholic fatty liver in Asia: Firmly entrenched and rapidly gaining ground. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011, 26: 163-172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Moscatiello S, Manini R, Marchesini G: Diabetes and liver disease: an ominous association. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007, 17: 63-70. 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.08.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lonardo A, Lombardini S, Ricchi M, Scaglioni F, Loria P: Review article: hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005, 22 (Suppl 2): 64-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bedogni G, Gastaldelli A, Manco M, De Col A, Agosti F, Tiribelli C, Sartorio A: Relationship between fatty liver and glucose metabolism: a cross-sectional study in 571 obese children. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010, 22: 120-126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin YC, Lo HM, Chen JD: Sonographic fatty liver, overweight and ischemic heart disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11: 4838-4842.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Takeda N, Nagata C, Takeda J, Sarui H, Kawahito Y, Yoshida N, Suetsugu A, Kato T, et al: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a novel predictor of cardiovascular disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13: 1579-1584.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Volzke H, Robinson DM, Kleine V, Deutscher R, Hoffmann W, Ludemann J, Schminke U, Kessler C, John U: Hepatic steatosis is associated with an increased risk of carotid atherosclerosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11: 1848-1853.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, Rodella S, Tessari R, Zenari L, Day C, Arcaro G: Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 1212-1218. 10.2337/dc06-2247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi SY, Kim D, Kim HJ, Kang JH, Chung SJ, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim CH, Choi SH, Kim W, et al: The relation between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the risk of coronary heart disease in Koreans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009, 104: 1953-1960. 10.1038/ajg.2009.238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Machado M, Cortez-Pinto H: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006, 9: 637-642. 10.1097/01.mco.0000241677.40170.17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vanni E, Bugianesi E, Kotronen A, De Minicis S, Yki-Jarvinen H, Svegliati-Baroni G: From the metabolic syndrome to NAFLD or vice versa?. Dig Liver Dis. 2010, 42: 320-330. 10.1016/j.dld.2010.01.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rhee E-J, Lee W-Y, Cho Y-K, Kim B-I, Sung K-C: Hyperinsulinemia and the Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nondiabetic Adults. Am J Med. 2011, 124: 69-76. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.08.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eguchi Y, Mizuta T, Sumida Y, Ishibashi E, Kitajima Y, Isoda H, Horie H, Tashiro T, Iwamoto E, Takahashi H, et al: The pathological role of visceral fat accumulation in steatosis, inflammation, and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol. 2011, 46 (Suppl 1): 70-78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eguchi Y, Eguchi T, Mizuta T, Ide Y, Yasutake T, Iwakiri R, Hisatomi A, Ozaki I, Yamamoto K, Kitajima Y, et al: Visceral fat accumulation and insulin resistance are important factors in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol. 2006, 41: 462-469. 10.1007/s00535-006-1790-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsai EC, Boyko EJ, Leonetti DL, Fujimoto WY: Low serum testosterone level as a predictor of increased visceral fat in Japanese-American men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000, 24: 485-491. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Svartberg J, von Muhlen D, Sundsfjord J, Jorde R: Waist circumference and testosterone levels in community dwelling men. The Tromso study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004, 19: 657-663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zitzmann M: Testosterone deficiency, insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009, 5: 673-681. 10.1038/nrendo.2009.212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Punnonen K, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen TP, Valkonen VP, Salonen R, Salonen JT: Testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin predict the metabolic syndrome and diabetes in middle-aged men. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1036-1041. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Derby CA, Zilber S, Brambilla D, Morales KH, McKinlay JB: Body mass index, waist circumference and waist to hip ratio and change in sex steroid hormones: the Massachusetts Male Ageing Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006, 65: 125-131. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02560.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsai EC, Matsumoto AM, Fujimoto WY, Boyko EJ: Association of bioavailable, free, and total testosterone with insulin resistance: influence of sex hormone-binding globulin and body fat. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 861-868. 10.2337/diacare.27.4.861.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pitteloud N, Mootha VK, Dwyer AA, Hardin M, Lee H, Eriksson KF, Tripathy D, Yialamas M, Groop L, Elahi D, Hayes FJ: Relationship between testosterone levels, insulin sensitivity, and mitochondrial function in men. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 1636-1642. 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1636.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kley HK, Nieschlag E, Wiegelmann W, Solbach HG, Kruskemper HL: Steroid hormones and their binding in plasma of male patients with fatty liver, chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1975, 79: 275-285.Google Scholar
  25. Völzke H, Aumann N, Krebs A, Nauck M, Steveling A, Lerch MM, Rosskopf D, Wallaschofski H: Hepatic steatosis is associated with low serum testosterone and high serum DHEAS levels in men. Int J Androl. 2010, 33: 45-53. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00953.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Haider A, Gooren LJ, Padungtod P, Saad F: Improvement of the metabolic syndrome and of non-alcoholic liver steatosis upon treatment of hypogonadal elderly men with parenteral testosterone undecanoate. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010, 118: 167-171. 10.1055/s-0029-1202774.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. S-i K: Watanabe N, Numata M, Ogawa T, Matsuzaki S: Increase in the prevalence of fatty liver in Japan over the past 12 years: analysis of clinical background. J Gastroenterol. 2003, 38: 954-961. 10.1007/s00535-003-1178-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Cerrelli F, Lenzi M, Manini R, Natale S, Vanni E, Villanova N, Melchionda N, Rizzetto M: Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003, 37: 917-923. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim HJ, Lee KE, Kim DJ, Kim SK, Ahn CW, Lim SK, Kim KR, Lee HC, Huh KB, Cha BS: Metabolic significance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese, nondiabetic adults. Arch Intern Med. 2004, 164: 2169-2175. 10.1001/archinte.164.19.2169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. WHO: Report of a WHO consultation on obesity: prevention and managing, the global epidemic. 1999, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985, 28: 412-419. 10.1007/BF00280883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chung SJ, Kim D, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS: Metabolic syndrome and visceral obesity as risk factors for reflux oesophagitis: a cross-sectional case–control study of 7078 Koreans undergoing health check-ups. Gut. 2008, 57: 1360-1365. 10.1136/gut.2007.147090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Maurovich-Horvat P, Massaro J, Fox CS, Moselewski F, O'Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U: Comparison of anthropometric, area- and volume-based assessment of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes using multi-detector computed tomography. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006, 31: 500-506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Glantz SA, Slinker BK: Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. 1990, New York: McGraw-Hill, 181-238.Google Scholar
  35. Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ: Serum testosterone assays–accuracy matters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 520-524. 10.1210/jc.2003-032175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Myking O, Aakvaag A, Digranes O: Androgen-oestrogen imbalance in men with chronic alcoholism and fatty liver. Alcohol Alcohol. 1987, 22: 7-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Seidell JC, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L, Kvist H, Sannerstedt R: Visceral fat accumulation in men is positively associated with insulin, glucose, and C-peptide levels, but negatively with testosterone levels. Metabolism. 1990, 39: 897-901. 10.1016/0026-0495(90)90297-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kapoor D, Malkin CJ, Channer KS, Jones TH: Androgens, insulin resistance and vascular disease in men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005, 63: 239-250. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02299.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pitteloud N, Hardin M, Dwyer AA, Valassi E, Yialamas M, Elahi D, Hayes FJ: Increasing insulin resistance is associated with a decrease in Leydig cell testosterone secretion in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90: 2636-2641. 10.1210/jc.2004-2190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tarantino G, Savastano S, Colao A: Hepatic steatosis, low-grade chronic inflammation and hormone/growth factor/adipokine imbalance. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16: 4773-4783. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4773.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Kamada Y, Takehara T, Hayashi N: Adipocytokines and liver disease. J Gastroenterol. 2008, 43: 811-822. 10.1007/s00535-008-2213-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Maggio M: Correlation between Testosterone and the Inflammatory Marker Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor in Older Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91: 345-347. 10.1210/jc.2005-1097.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Punnonen K, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen TP, Salonen R, Rauramaa R, Salonen JT: Sex hormones, inflammation and the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003, 149: 601-608. 10.1530/eje.0.1490601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kupelian V, Chiu GR, Araujo AB, Williams RE, Clark RV, McKinlay JB: Association of sex hormones and C-reactive protein levels in men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010, 72: 527-533. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03713.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Malkin CJ, Pugh PJ, Jones RD, Kapoor D, Channer KS, Jones TH: The effect of testosterone replacement on endogenous inflammatory cytokines and lipid profiles in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 3313-3318. 10.1210/jc.2003-031069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Payer J, Banarova A: The influence of testosterone on cardiovascular disease in men. Vnitr Lek. 2010, 56: 702-708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Langfort J, Jagsz S, Dobrzyn P, Brzezinska Z, Klapcinska B, Galbo H, Gorski J: Testosterone affects hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) activity and lipid metabolism in the left ventricle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 399: 670-676. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Joy D, Thava VR, Scott BB: Diagnosis of fatty liver disease: is biopsy necessary?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003, 15: 539-543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/12/69/prepub

Copyright

© Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement