- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Fully covered self-expanding metal stents placed temporarily in the bile duct: safety profile and histologic classification in a porcine model
© Bakhru et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 6 December 2010
- Accepted: 20 June 2011
- Published: 20 June 2011
Fully covered Self-Expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) have been shown efficacious in palliating malignant biliary obstructions. There is little data analyzing mucosal response to their temporary placement in the bile duct.
Ten mini pigs underwent endoscopic placement of a FCSEMS (Wallflex, Boston Scientific). FCSEMS were kept in place for three months. At the end of the 3 months, FCSEMS were removed endoscopically. Five pigs were euthanized and their bile ducts harvested. The other five were kept alive for another month post removal. A single pathologist, created a scoring system (to determine degree of inflammation, fibrosis, and epithelial injury), examined all specimens in a blinded fashion.
Four FCSEMS spontaneously migrated in the duodenum. On post mortem examination, mild mucosal thickness was noted in three bile duct specimens while superficial inflammation of the bile duct was noted in five animals. Histologic examination of the bile duct revealed focal acute inflammation in both groups. For the 5 animals euthanized immediately after stent removal, there was a tendency to have superficial mucosal erosion and fibrosis. In contrast, increased chronic inflammation was more commonly seen in the animals 1 month post stent removal, with all animals in this group showing moderate degrees of mononuclear inflammatory cell mucosal infiltrates. No severe inflammatory or fibrotic duct injury was observed in any of the study animals, with degree of injury graded as mild to moderate.
FCSEMS appear to induce minimal tissue overgrowth or fibrosis post placement. Ease of removability and no significant histologic injury are advantages noted with FCSEMS., however, further studies are needed to evaluate treating benign biliary strictures with FCSEMS in humans.
- Bile Duct
- Stent Placement
- Metal Stents
- Stent Migration
- Stent Removal
In the past decade, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been preferred for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice compared to plastic stents, especially in patients with longer predicted survival [1–5]. They provide prolonged patency, reduced endoscopic sessions, and better drainage due to their larger diameter [6, 7]. A major limitation of uncovered SEMS is their occlusion due to tumor growth through the uncovered mesh [8, 9]. Partially covered and later fully covered metal stents were created to prevent this occurrence . In terms of patency, recent studies do not demonstrate an advantage for covered metal stents, however, the ability to remove them offer the option of treating benign biliary strictures [10–12].
Partially covered metal stents when studied for benign biliary strictures were associated with migration and epithelial hypertrophy at the level of the uncovered portion of the metal stent [13, 14]. Fully covered metal stent with fins had their own set of complications probably related to their high radial force and anti-migratory fins [15–17].
A recently developed FCSEMS with flared ends, without fins might offer a higher resolution rate, if placed temporarily in the bile duct, with limited complications . Currently, there is limited data analyzing mucosal response to their temporary placement in the bile duct.
With the evolution of stents, the pathologic changes that can occur in the bile duct are still not clear. Indeed few animal studies have been done to examine various stents and their effects on the bile duct.
The aim of this study is to establish the safety and histologic effects of temporary FCSEMS placement in a porcine model.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the University of Virginia's Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC #3756) approved the study. A total of 10 female mini pigs (with acceptable health status and body weight) were acclimated in the vivarium for at least 3 days after arrival.
The animals were fasted the night before and water withheld the morning before procedures. Animals were pre-medicated intramuscularly with atropine sulphate (0.04 mg/kg) and anesthesia was induced with intramuscular Telazol/Xylazine 4-6/2 mg/kg. Propofol 2-3 mg/kg body weight was administered intravenously to effect to facilitate intubation. Isoflurane titrated to effect was administered to maintain anesthesia. Ventilation was provided via an endotracheal tube.
The animals were placed in recumbence on their left side on a fluoroscopy table. Vitals sign were continuously monitored during the procedure as well as distress or pain.
After the procedure, the animals were monitored continuously until fully recovered from anesthesia. Yohimbine (0.3 mg/kg) was administered during recovery from anesthesia and ketoprofen (0.5-1.0 mg/kg q 12 hr) with perceived level of need for post-operative analgesia. The animals were monitored daily by a veterinary technician.
Clinical signs including weight loss, pain, or jaundice were monitored as well as daily food intake, respiratory rate, heart rate, and demeanor score (scored as follows: 1 = normal; 2 = slightly to moderately depressed, listless, will stand; 3 = severely depressed, recumbent, will not stand) for the first month following FCEMS placement and weekly thereafter. Subsequently all animals had blood drawn (7 cc) at 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 2.5 months and as needed if the animal showed any clinical signs of malaise. Blood tests included: Total bilirubin (TB), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK) and Cell blood Count (CBC). The primary investigator (MK) reviewed any abnormal laboratory values.
At three months, all animals underwent endoscopic FCSEMS removal. The procedure for removal was similar to placement as described above including evaluating FCSEMS position and any tissue reaction or food impaction. The stent was grasped with a snare or forceps under endoscopic control (Figure 1C). Contrast injection via catheter was used to assess ductal anatomy post removal under fluoroscopy (Figure 1D).
The remaining 5 animals were observed for one month. After one month, they underwent repeat ERC before being euthanized and their bile duct harvested for histologic examination.
The dedicated scoring system described in Table 1 was applied by a single pathologist in a blinded fashion to quantify inflammation, fibrosis, and epithelial injury.
All 10 pigs had successful placement of a fully covered WallFlex stent, three pigs received a 10 mm × 40 mm stent and seven received an 8 mm × 60 mm stent. The stents were deployed proximal to the papilla and confirmed in proper position under fluoroscopy. Three of the pigs (Pig #1, 7, 10) had complications during the initial procedure. One pig had a wire perforation on a peripheral branch of the biliary tree noted under contrast injection during stent placement. Two other pigs had a contained perforation of the bulb during a challenging biliary cannulation, requiring the procedure to be postponed for 6 and 8 days, while the animal were treated with omeprazole (20 mg/d) to reduce inflammation. All three pigs were managed conservatively and fully recovered post procedure.
For the next three months, monitoring of the pigs included clinical parameters:, i.e.: respiratory rate, heart rate, and demeanor score daily as well as daily food intake for the first month and then weekly. The median change in weight was 16.8 kg with all mini-pigs gaining weight.
Total bilirubin was within normal range for the 2 week, 1.5 month, and 2.5 month interval. All ten pigs had low alkaline phosphatase through each interval with no significant rise. Only one pig had a clinically insignificant decrease in hemoglobin in the first two week interval and then normal at 1.5 and 2.5 months. Eight pigs had low WBC at the two week interval however there was no significant increase in WBC. Pig #1, 2, 4, and 5 were noted to have uneventful stent migration between 41 to 57 days after deployment, all found in the feces of the animal.
For the animals euthanized immediately after stent removal, there was a tendency to have more acute epithelial injury (Figure 4B) in the form of superficial mucosal erosion (4/5 vs 2/5) and mild to moderate mucosal fibrosis (3/5 vs 0/5) (Figure 4C).
In contrast, increased chronic inflammation (Figure 4D) was more commonly seen in the animals 1 month post stent removal (5/5 vs 2/5), with all animals in this group showing moderate degrees of mononuclear inflammatory cell mucosal infiltrates.
The degree of injury was mild to moderate both in acute and chronic inflammation, with no animal showing severe injury. Specifically, there was no abscess formation, deep tissue involvement by chronic inflammation, severe fibrosis, or mucosal ulceration (Table 2).
Fully covered self-expanding metal stents without fins offer adequate biliary drainage in malignant obstruction and potential advantages including reduction in mucosal hyperplasia and migration . These benefits present an attractive option for benign biliary strictures, which can be clinically challenging to treat with serious and often irreversible complications [19, 20].
This study analyzes the histologic changes in the bile duct induced by temporary placement of FCSEMS. This particular FCSEMS has a platinol wiring, associated with increased flexibility and radiopacity compared to its predecessor, the partially covered Wallstent . The close cell construction and double coating should reduce tissue ingrowth while the looped and flared ends are intended to reduce tissue trauma and stent migration.
Previous studies have examined the effects of stent placement on the bile duct, but were not designed to provide a histologic grading system for the changes noted. Silvis et al examined surgically placed covered and uncovered wire mesh stents (Wallstent 5 mmx23 mm) in the canine biliary tract and showed mild to moderate cellular infiltration in all animals and marked mucosal hyperplasia with uncovered stents . Van Os et al examined self expanding spiral nitinol stents in a porcine model but had technical limitations in stent placement and removal, related to disparity in stent and duct size or faulty release mechanism (3 of 6 animals). They showed moderate inflammation and fibrosis in 4 of 6 animals euthanized 3 months after stent deployment and mild inflammation in 2 animals kept alive one more month . Further, Ginsberg et al studied bioabsorbable biliary stents in a porcine model, which remained patent up to 6 months with no bile duct integration or proliferative changes, however, stent occlusion and migration was still encountered . More recently, Petersen and colleagues examined the ability to remove partially covered Wallflex stents (within five minutes of deployment) utilizing a porcine model. They demonstrated no significant tissue damage leading to complications .
Our objective was to assess the potential changes in the bile duct epithelium after stent placement. Ten mini-pigs were selected and clinically monitored after stent placement for 3 months. Stents were removed or had migrated from all animals at the end of 3 months.
Clinically, there was no evidence of any biliary obstruction in the next three months as evidenced by lack of rising laboratory parameters (bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, hematocrit, white blood cell count) or clinical findings (jaundice, decreased food intake, pain, change in vital signs or demeanor score). Overall, all pigs gained weight with median change at 16.8 kg from baseline to stent removal.
During the three-month follow up, four of the animals were found with the stent in their feces within two months of placement, without any clinical consequences. The other six had stent removal with no difficulty, except one.
Endoscopic findings at 3 months demonstrated a normal cholangiogram on all animals. Specifically, no biliary injury was noticed on fluoroscopic examination. Gross pathologic examination revealed only mild superficial inflammation in two mini-pigs and mild mucosal thickness in three. The pigs that were euthanized at the 3 month mark included those with stent migration. (Table 1) In addition, of the five mini-pigs kept alive for another month, three had superficial inflammation noted after harvesting the bile duct (Table 2).
The histologic examination confirmed mild acute inflammation in five of the animals, and superficial mucosal erosion (4/5) and mucosal fibrosis (3/5) in the animals sacrificed immediately after stent removal. In contrast, increased chronic inflammation (involving of mucosal and/or submucosal area) was more commonly seen in the animals kept alive after stent removal (5/5). The degree of injury was mild to moderate and no animal had severe injury classified as abscess formation, deep tissue inflammatory involvement, severe fibrosis, or mucosal ulceration.
This study emphasizes the need for a systematic histologic assessment in order to truly understand the implication associated with temporary metal stent placement.
Using a scoring system developed by our pathologist, the bile duct histopathologic alterations after temporary stent placement can be measured and reproduced. This scoring system once validated has the potential to be used for biopsy of the bile duct after stent removal in a patient. Further clinical studies in human subjects using this scoring system could effectively prove the ultimate safety of FCEMS in humans and possibly expand the indication of metal stents to benign biliary strictures.
Limitations to this study include small sample size. Early migration of the stents (noted in 4 pigs #1, 2, 4, 5) was another limitation of this study. All four were analyzed histologically at 3 months. Even though the migration occurred from 41-57 days, respectively, they had similar histologic scores along with the six other pigs. However, because of the early migration, they should be considered as having stent deployed for approximately 1.5-2 months. Importantly, we did not evaluate for post-stenting pancreatitis because of the anatomical difference that would make it less likely for post-ercp pancreatitis in a porcine model. Post-ercp pancreatitis after FCSEMS placement would be a complication to evaluate in human studies, especially in benign biliary strictures.
Overall, FCSEMS only appear to induce minimal acute inflammation and more importantly minimal fibrosis after stent removal. Chronic inflammation of mild to moderate degree was noted in the animals alive one month longer. The inflammation overall appears to have no clinical effect. Their high rate of migration in the normal bile duct of the pig suggests the necessity to induce a stricture before placement. However, it remains to be determined if FCSEMS can achieve sustained resolution of benign biliary stricture in humans.
-The study was funded from a research grant from Boston Scientific.
-The author would like to acknowledge the support provided by Fujinon who supplied all endoscopes used in this study.
- Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Delcenserie R, Canard JM, Fritsch J, Rey JF, Burtin P: Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003, 57 (2): 178-182. 10.1067/mge.2003.66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Palma GD, Pezzullo A, Rega M, Persico M, Patrone F, Mastantuono L, Persico G: Unilateral placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar obstruction: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003, 58 (1): 50-53. 10.1067/mge.2003.310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman ML, Overby C: Selective MRCP and CT-targeted drainage of malignant hilar biliary obstruction with self-expanding metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003, 58 (1): 41-49. 10.1067/mge.2003.292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perdue DG, Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Overby CS, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Snady HW, Moore JP, ERCP Outcome Study ERCOST Group: Plastic versus self-expanding metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: A prospective multicenter observational cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008, 42 (9): 1040-1046. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31815853e0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moss AC, Morris E, Mac Mathuna P: Palliative biliary stents for obstructing pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, CD004200-2Google Scholar
- Wagner HJ, Knyrim K, Vakil N, Klose KJ: Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. A prospective and randomized trial. Endoscopy. 1993, 25 (3): 213-218. 10.1055/s-2007-1010295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Costamagna G, Pandolfi M: Endoscopic stenting for biliary and pancreatic malignancies. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004, 38 (1): 59-67. 10.1097/00004836-200401000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon WJ, Lee JK, Lee KH, Lee WJ, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB: A comparison of covered and uncovered wallstents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006, 63 (7): 996-1000. 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Tsujino T, Sasahira N, Hirano K, Toda N, Nakai Y, Yamamoto N, Tada M, Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Kawabe T, Omata M: A prospective randomised study of "covered" versus "uncovered" diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gut. 2004, 53 (5): 729-734. 10.1136/gut.2003.018945. PMCID: PMC1774024View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kahaleh M, Tokar J, Le T, Yeaton P: Removal of self-expandable metallic wallstents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004, 60 (4): 640-644. 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01959-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park do H, Kim MH, Choi JS, Lee SS, Seo DW, Kim JH, Han J, Kim JC, Choi EK, Lee SK: Covered versus uncovered wallstent for malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction: A cohort comparative analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006, 4 (6): 790-796. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahaleh M, Behm B, Clarke BW, Brock A, Shami VM, De La Rue SA, Sundaram V, Tokar J, Adams RB, Yeaton P: Temporary placement of covered self-expandable metal stents in benign biliary strictures: A new paradigm? (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008, 67 (3): 446-454. 10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho H, Mahajan A, Gosain S, Jain A, Brock A, Rehan ME, Ellen K, Shami VM, Kahaleh M: Management of complications associated with partially covered biliary metal stents. Dig Dis Sci. 2009Google Scholar
- Behm B, Brock A, Clarke BW, Ellen K, Northup PG, Dumonceau JM, Kahaleh M: Partially covered self-expandable metallic stents for benign biliary strictures due to chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2009, 41 (6): 547-551. 10.1055/s-0029-1214708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahajan A, Ho H, Sauer B, Phillips MS, Shami VM, Ellen K, Rehan M, Schmitt TM, Kahaleh M: Temporary placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stents in benign biliary strictures: Midterm evaluation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009, 70 (2): 303-309. 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Isayama H, Nakai Y, Toyokawa Y, Togawa O, Gon C, Ito Y, Yashima Y, Yagioka H, Kogure H, Sasaki T, Arizumi T, Matsubara S, Yamamoto N, Sasahira N, Hirano K, Tsujino T, Toda N, Tada M, Kawabe T, Omata M: Measurement of radial and axial forces of biliary self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009, 70 (1): 37-44. 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang AY, Ellen K, Berg CL, Schmitt TM, Kahaleh M: Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in the management of complex biliary leaks: Preliminary data - a case series. Endoscopy. 2009, 41 (9): 781-786. 10.1055/s-0029-1215050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen BT, Kahaleh M, Kozarek R, Loren D, Gupta K, Kowalski T, Freeman M, Chen Y, Branch M, Edmundowicz S, Binmoeller K, Baron T, Gluck M, Kamran A, Shah R, Kinney T, Ross WA, Jowell P: A multi-site, single arm, prospective study of a new nitinol, self-expanding, biliary fully-covered stent for the palliative treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction. 2008, 67 (5): AB232-T1498.Google Scholar
- Frattaroli FM, Reggio D, Guadalaxara A, Illomei G, Pappalardo G: Benign biliary strictures: A review of 21 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1996, 183 (5): 506-513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Judah JR, Draganov PV: Endoscopic therapy of benign biliary strictures. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13 (26): 3531-3539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Soderlund C, Linder S: Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006, 63 (7): 986-995. 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silvis SE, Sievert CE, Vennes JA, Abeyta BK, Brennecke LH: Comparison of covered versus uncovered wire mesh stents in the canine biliary tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994, 40 (1): 17-21. 10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70004-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Os EC, Petersen BT, Batts KP: Spiral nitinol biliary stents in a porcine model: Evaluation of the potential for use in benign strictures. Endoscopy. 1999, 31 (3): 253-259. 10.1055/s-1999-13678.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ginsberg G, Cope C, Shah J, Martin T, Carty A, Habecker P, Kaufmann C, Clerc C, Nuutinen JP, Tormala P: In vivo evaluation of a new bioabsorbable self-expanding biliary stent. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003, 58 (5): 777-784. 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02016-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen BT, Damarati J, Gregory PG: Acute removability study of the partially-covered wallflex metal biliary stent in a porcine model. 2007, 65 (5): AB231-M1336.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/76/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.