- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Non-invasive index of liver fibrosis induced by alcohol, thioacetamide and schistosomal infection in mice
© Hessien et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 15 September 2009
- Accepted: 1 June 2010
- Published: 1 June 2010
Non invasive approaches will likely be increasing utilized to assess liver fibrosis. This work provides a new non invasive index to predict liver fibrosis induced in mice.
Fibrosis was generated by thioacetamide (TAA), chronic intake of ethanol, or infection with S. mansoni in 240 mice. Both progression and regression of fibrosis (after treatment with silymarin and/or praziquantel) were monitored. The following methods were employed: (i) The METAVIR system was utilized to grade and stage liver inflammation and fibosis; (ii) Determination of hepatic hydroxyproline and collagen; and (iii) Derivation of a new hepatic fibrosis index from the induced changes, and its prospective validation in a group of 70 mice.
The index is composed of 4 serum variable including total proteins, γ-GT, bilirubin and reduced glutathione (GSH), measured in diseased, treated and normal mice. These parameters were highly correlated with both the histological stage and the grade. They were combined in a logarithmic formula, which non-invasively scores the severity of liver fibrosis through a range (0 to 2), starting with healthy liver (corresponding to stage 0) to advanced fibrosis (corresponding stage 3).Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for the accuracy of the index to predict the histological stages demonstrated that the areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.954, 0.979 and 0.99 for index values corresponding to histological stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Also, the index was correlated with stage and grade, (0.947 and 0.859, respectively). The cut off values that cover the range between stages 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3 are 0.4, 1.12 and 1.79, respectively. The results in the validation group confirmed the accuracy of the test. The AUROC was 0.869 and there was good correlation with the stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation.
The index fulfils the basic criteria of non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis since it is liver-specific, easy to implement, reliable, and inexpensive. It proved to be accurate in discriminating precirrhotic stages.
- Liver Fibrosis
- Hepatic Stellate Cell
- Receiver Operate Characteristic Curf Curve
The end stage complications of liver disease including cirrhosis, and portal hypertension are related to advanced fibrosis . Management decisions in patients with chronic liver diseases often depend upon the stage of liver fibrosis. Hence, the accurate estimation of fibrosis is important for the prevention of the subsequent complications. For 60 years, liver biopsy has been regarded as a gold standard diagnostic method for assessing liver fibrosis. Despite its longstanding utility, liver biopsy has some disadvantages which include its invasive nature , expense, as well as inter observer variability. It also has some negative features such as resistance of patients to undergo liver biopsy due to the discomfort , possible complications , and sampling error due to inadequate liver specimen length or fragmentation [4, 5]. Therefore, alternative and accurate non invasive means to estimate fibrosis are needed.
Multiple hepatic fibrosis markers utilizing either simple blood tests or measurements of components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) have been proposed, and some are in clinical use. Imbert-Bismut and colleagues  proposed an index combining 5 variables (bilirubin, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GT), haptoglobin, alpha 2-macroglobulin, and apoliprotein A1). The index ranges from 0-1 and currently is marketed as the FibroTest. Subsequently, other hepatic fibrosis markers have been proposed such as the Forns index , the AST/platelet ratio index (APRI) , and the European or Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Index . These tests generally separate mild from significant fibrosis or mild/moderate from advanced fibrosis. Apart from Fibrotest, they usually have 2 cut offs with an indeterminate zone, where the accuracy is less. They can also be combined in decisional algorithms [10, 11]. Another non invasive tool is transient elastography, either alone or combined with a hepatic fibrosis marker such as the Fibrotest . Other investigators have suggested for best accuracy combining both a simple index and an ECM index [12, 13]. Such approach expands the number of investigations and increases the cost required to stage the degree of fibrosis.
The majority of publications have been concerned with fibrosis among HCV infected patients. Also, few studies have monitored the regression of drug-mediated fibrosis. This triggered our interest to establish a non-invasive index to score the liver fibrosis in mice models induced by injury from a hepatotoxin (thioacetamide, TAA), chronic intake of alcohol or Schistosomal infection. Moreover, we employed the index to monitor the reversibility of fibrosis in mice treated with silymarin and/or praziquantel (PZQ). The index includes four serum biochemical markers (3 liver-specific and one oxidative stress) combined in a logarithmic formula derived from values of both tested and normal control mice.
The study was carried out on 310 albino mice (MC1 strain), weighing 17.78-26.62 g, They were kept in breeding cages, and they received similar basic care with a standard diet. The test set included 240 mice, whereas the validation set included 70 mice. Humane and ethical animal practices were followed that were under the standard regulations dictated by the animal care committee of School of Science, Tanta University.
70 mice were used to validate the proposed index (validation group). These animals were categorised into 4 subgroups. Three groups (20 mice each) were treated with TAA, infected with S. mansoni or intoxicated with ethanol similar to groups I, V and X, respectively. Animals of these groups were sequentially sacrificed, where 5-7 animals were killed every 10-15 days. The fourth group (10 mice) was untreated and used as a normal control group.
Induction and treatment of liver fibrosis
TAA-induced liver fibrosis was generated in mice by intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/Kg TAA (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., USA) twice a week for a month . S. mansoni-induced liver fibrosis was generated by immersion of mouse tails into a suspension of 50 cercaria for 30 minutes. Cercaria usually develop into larva, and subsequently into an adult worm in about 42 days . To develop ethanol-induced liver fibrosis, ethanol (10%) was given to the mice in drinking water  for at least 35 days. Silymarin (Sedico Co., Egypt) was dissolved in water (140 mg/dl) and taken orally . As a reference antischistosomiasis drug, mice (in groups VI and IX) were orally injected by lavage with a single dose of 600 mg/Kg of mice body weight of PZQ (Biltricide, Epico Co., ARE). In the validation group (n = 70), liver fibrosis was similarly induced like test groups, then animals were given code numbers. Both the histological anlaysis and the score value were independently caluculated for each mouse.
At the end of treatment period, animals were sacrificed, where both blood and the liver tissues were collected. Serum was recovered for biochemical investigations and liver homogenate was prepared and used for determination of hepatic variables. In addition, a portion of the liver was preserved in 10% formalin and used in histopathological analysis.
Serum total bilirubin, gamma glutamyltransferase (γ-GT) (E.C.184.108.40.206.) activity, and total proteins (TP) were estimated using the commercially available reagents following the manufacturer instructions. Serum level of reduced glutathione (GSH) was estimated according to Ellman . The method is based on the oxidation of GSH by 5,5'-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid, [DTNB], and the resultant yellow colored ion, is measured at 412 nm. Liver homogenate (10%) was prepared and used to estimate total malondialdehyde (MDA) according to Okhawa and Ohishi . The method depends on the reaction of MDA with thiobarbituric acid (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., USA). Also, hydroxyproline (HP) content of collagen was determined in liver according to Bergman and Loxlely  and Medugorac , where HP was hydrolyzed with HCl, oxidized into pyrole and coupled with p-dimethyl-aminobenzaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., USA) forming a red color, which is measured at 558 nm. The collagen content was calculated by multiplying the HP concentration by 7.46, where this imino acid represents 13.4% of collagen. Tissue transglutaminase activity was estimated in 100 μl liver homogenate, by a direct spectrophotometric method developed by DeMacedo and co-authors . The method uses N,N-dimethyl-1,4-phenylenediamine (DMPDA) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., USA) as γ-glutamyl acceptor substrate and carbobenzyloxy L-glutamylglycine (Z-Gln-Gly) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co, USA) as a peptide γ-glutamyl donor substrate. The resulting anilide, substituted with a strong electron-donating group, is a chromophore that absorbs light at 278 nm. Thus, the transamidation activity of transglutaminase could be determined kinetically over 7 minutes period by measuring the increase in absorbance. A routine laboratory method was used in determination of proteins in liver homogenate assayed according to Lowry et al.,  using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Histological and non-invasive scoring of liver fibrosis
In order to analyze the histological features of liver according to the METAVIR scoring system, the standard protocol of tissue staining  was applied, where liver tissues were fixed, paraffin-embedded and stained with at least haematoxylin and eosin. Slides were examined by a single pathologist unaware of animal treatments. Every specimen was staged according to F0 to F4 system: F0 = no fibrosis, F1 = portal fibrosis without septa, F2 = few septa, F3 = numerous septa without cirrhosis, and F4 = cirrhosis . Histological activity (a measure of necroinflammatory lesions) was graded as follows: G0 = no histological activity, G1 = mild activity, G2 = moderate activity, and G3 = severe activity.
Both serum and hepatic variables are expressed as a mean (± standard deviation). The normal distribution of initial data (bilirubin, TP, γ-GT and GSH) was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) normality test. Accordingly, the comparison between means were analyzed by the ANOVA test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. The correlation between index variables and the histological stages and grades were investigated. Also, the correlations between the non invasive score and the corresponding histological stage and grade were estimated by the nonparametric Spearman correlation test. Comparisons between the histological stages of diffrent groups were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Graphpad Instat software package (Graphpad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used, however reciever operating curves (ROC) and K mean clustring were performed by SPSS-10.0 (strandard version, SPSS Inc.).
Levels of serum markers used to formulate the non-invasive fibrosis index
Group No. (treatment)
γ GT (U/L)
0.015 ± 0.006
9.27 ± 0.83
6.10 ± 0.10
1.42 ± 0.04
0.19 ± 0.017a
28.49 ± 1.32a
3.83 ± 0.17a
0.82 ± 0.02a
III (TAA silymarin)
0.037 ± 0.006ab
13.9 ± 0.82ab
5.67 ± 0.22ab
1.34 ± 0.01ab
IV (TAA then Silymarin)
0.024 ± 0.009b
10.42 ± 0.82b
5.98 ± 0.13b
1.38 ± 0.03b
V (S. mansoni infection).
0.127 ± 0.019a
22.93 ± 0.52a
4.74 ± 0.22a
1.23 ± 0.02a
VI (PZQ after infection).
0.103 ± 0.019a
22.00 ± 0.63a
4.80 ± 0.23a
1.24 ± 0.03a
VII (Silymarin during infection).
0.054 ± 0.008ab
16.91 ± 1.04ab
5.25 ± 0.18ab
1.33 ± 0.03ab
VIII (Silymarin after infection).
0.065 ± 0.008ab
18.30 ± 0.97ab
5.07 ± 0.11ab
1.31 ± 0.01ab
IX (Silymarin after PZQ).
0.017 ± 0.006b
9.73 ± 0.63b
5.95 ± 0.15b
1.41 ± 0.02b
0.162 ± 0.017a
26.17 ± 1.32a
4.31 ± 0.20a
0.99 ± 0.03a
XI (Silymarin during ethanol intake).
0.028 ± 0.006ab
11.12 ± 1.04ab
5.85 ± 0.23ab
1.34 ± 0.01ab
XII (Silymarin after ethanol intake).
0.022 ± 0.008b
10.19 ± 0.97b
5.95 ± 0.35b
1.40 ± 0.02b
Liver and oxidative stress markers in liver tissue
Group No. (treatment)
14.84 ± 1.24
110.80 ± 9.22
0.83 ± 0.02
42.65 ± 3.65a
318.19 ± 27.2a
2.15 ± 0.12a
III (TAA+ silymarin)
17.33 ± 1.97ab
129.24 ± 14.66ab
0.99 ± 0.07ab
IV (TAA then Silymarin)
16.14 ± 1.43b
122.14 ± 10.70b
0.87 ± 0.04 b
V (S. mansoni infection).
32.40 ± 2.35a
241.83 ± 17.50a
1.39 ± 0.14a
VI (Praziquantel after infection).
31.72 ± 2.68a
236.62 ± 20.02a
1.32 ± 0.05a
VII (Silymarin during infection).
19.28 ± 1.35ab
143.84 ± 10.08ab
1.09 ± 0.07a
VIII (Silymarin after infection).
21.92 ± 1.54ab
163.51 ± 11.47ab
1.14 ± 0.05a
IX (Silymarin after Prazaquantel).
15.94 ± 1.31b
118.88 ± 9.76b
0.85 ± 0.01b
37.96 ± 3.20a
283.19 ± 23.88a
1.74 ± 0.06a
XI (Silymarin during ethanol intake).
17.70 ± 1.58ab
132.04 ± 11.79ab
0.95 ± 0.02ab
XII (Silymarin after ethanol intake).
15.98 ± 1.82b
119.21 ± 13.55b
0.87 ± 0.03b
Correlations between non-invasive score and hepatic markers (MDA and collagen)
Hepatic biochemical variables
Non invasive score of training set
Modelling of hepatic fibrosis marker
Correlations between the histological analysis (stage and grade) and each marker of the index panel
Non invasive serum variables
Where: bil = serum total bilirubin, γ-GT = serum gamma glutamyl transferase, TP = serum total protein and GSH = reduced glutathione. Small letters (t and c), refer to the "test" and "control" samples, respectively. To calculate the non-invasive score, Bilc, γ-GTc, TPc and GSHc were replaced with the corresponding levels measured in normal mice (0.015 mg/dl, 9.27 U/l, 6.1 g/dl and 1.42 mM), respectively. This formula, derived from test set, was also used to assess fibrosis score of validation set.
Regression of fibrosis stage and inflammatory grade
Biochemical scoring of fibrosis
K-mean clustering and cut off values of the index corresponding to different precirrhotic histological stages
0.127 ± 0.03
0.668 ± 0.29
1.350 ± 0.26
2.030 ± 0.13
K mean clustering
Biochemical versus histological scoring
Area under receiver operating characteristic curves and range of confidence intervals for both test and validation sets
Asymptotic 95% Confidence Interval
Correlations and Kruskal-Wallis test between non-invasive score and the liver histology of both training and validation sets
Non invasive Score
P < 0.01
χ2 = 88.3
P < 0.05
χ2 = 82.4
χ2 = 76.4
P < 0.001
χ2 = 74.6
Without diminishing the importance of histological assessment of liver fibrosis, non-invasive indices are moving towards accuracy and reliability. Previously proposed panels have included 2 to 7 markers. Increasing the number of variables may improve the accuracy, however it also increases the complexity and cost of the index. Previously reported indices included one (or more) variables from four categories. These categories include: (i) ECM proteins and enzymes involved in scar production, degradation, or hepatic stellate cells (HSC) activation, such as laminin, collagen, lysyl oxidase, prolyl hydroxylase, lysyl hydroxylase hyalauronic acid, or tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1); (ii) Liver specific markers (bilirubin, transaminases or globulin); (iii) Haematological variables (platelets or PT); and (iv) Conjugated or derived lipids (apolipoprotein and cholesterol).
This work adds one more predictive non-invasive index that combines four simple, cheap and informative biochemical serum variables. The panel consists of an average number of variables (four), including three liver-specific, and one oxidative stress marker, simultaneously assessed in both normal (hypothetical standard) and tested samples. The aim was to formulate an index of liver fibrosis, which is experimentally induced with three different methods including: exposure to TAA, chronic alcohol intake and, for the first time, infection with S. mansoni, which predominantly exists in the Nile delta and upper-Egypt. Because the study was performed on mice, and due to the unavailability of animal model for HBV or HCV infection, viral hepatitis-induced liver fibrosis was not included. Also, the experiment was designed to non-invasively score the fibrotic changes during the compensated stages of fibrosis, where animals were maintained in the precirrhotic stages (< F4) to monitor the drug-mediated resolution of fibrosis.
Occupational TAA induced liver fibrosis in man is quite uncommon compared to alcohol, viral and s. mansoni related chronic liver diseases. It is, however a potent hepatotoxin that is rapidly eliminated and can cause cumulative injury . In addition to the oxidative stress it generates, TAA decreases the level of some endogenous antioxidants such as α-tocopherol . Consequently, it is anticipated that supplementation of mice with silymarin (a known anti-oxidant), will compensate the depletion of the vitamin and challenge the oxidant effect of TAA. Treatment of fibrosis in S. mansoni-infected mice, in contrast, required a specific eradication of the parasite with PZQ , followed by treatment with silymarin. This pattern of progressive and regressive fibrogenesis process was used to score the degree of scar formation (or resolution) using a dual approach of histological and non-invasive biochemical index.
The results revealed that oxidative stress commonly developed in mice with liver fibrosis as indicated by the depletion of serum GSH and elevated hepatic MDA. In such conditions, HSCs are activated and excessively produce ECM proteins (2-fold increase of hepatic collagen was observed). The over production of collagen was accompanied with changes in liver markers and the corresponding histological stage. We believe that the changes in the level (or the activity) of ECM proteins and enzymes, reported in some previous indices , follows the oxidative stress-mediated HSC activation. Novitskiy and his co-workers  found that treatment of HSC with ethanol led to the formation of ROS, activation of HSC and subsequently promotion of fibrogenesis. Thus, both GSH and hepatic MDA are able to monitor the initial steps rather than other ECM variables (collagens, HA, and other ECM proteins). Also, due to the complexity of ECM environment, inclusion of ECM variables may decrease the sensitivity of the index. Moreover, ECM proteins and enzymes are not exclusively liver-specific and may reflect impaired hepatic clearance . Mizushima and co-workers , for instance, validated prolyl hydroxylase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) as a marker of pancreatic fibrosis. Moreover, ECM molecules are largely affected by the balance between enzymes that control scar formation, stabilization and degradation. In addition certain pathological states, like pulmonary fibrosis, are associated with increased levels of certain fibrosis markers . Previously we found that transglutaminase (liver derived enzyme known to stabilize the scar formation) did not show significant differences among patients with different grades of cirrhosis and HCC . Also, the high correlations (Spearman) we obtained between GSH with both the histological stage and grade (-0.898 and -0.819, respectively) have nominated GSH as an integral member of the proposed index.
The remaining parameters included in the index are known to be directly involved in cellular pathogenesis and the synthetic capability of liver cells. ALT and AST have repeatedly used in hepatic fibrosis indices (individually, as a ratio or combined with other variables such as platelets [8, 35, 36]. ALT, in particular, was included in some non-invasive panels to indicate the necro-inflammatory activity . Detection of fibrosis in HCV patients with normal transaminases  may decrease their validity as fibrosis markers. Bilirubin and albumin (the major fraction of plasma proteins) are traditionally among the biochemical parameters used to monitor the severity of liver disease. γ-GT is used as a marker of liver damage by alcohol intake . This enhanced our predictive usefulness for the proposed index. The high correlations between liver histology (stage and grade) from one side and γ-GT (rather than ALT, AST, and ALP), bilirubin and T. Proteins from the other side (Table 4), have encouraged their combined involvement in the logarithmic formula. Liver dysfunction, leads to a decrease of the level of two of the selected markers (GSH and TP) and an increase the others (bilirubin and γ-GT). This predictive pattern was formulated by the mutual reversing the test/control ratio in the logarithmic formula.
The ground base is achieved in normal liver, where the ratio will be (or near to) "1". Accordingly, the index starts with "0", which corresponds to normal histological pattern. The highest scores (2, 1.5 and 1.8) matched the histological stages F3, F2 and F3 in groups II, V and X. A marked decrease in fibrosis index was observed in treated groups with index values ranging from 0.1 to 0.2.
Histologically, the highest fibrotic stage was observed in mice in groups II, V and X (Figure 2). Different treatments (with silymarin or PZQ), however, led to regression of the fibrotic stages to mild or moderate fibrosis in TAA groups or complete resolution of fibrosis in schistosomiasis and alcohol-induced fibrosis. The index was comparable to histological anaysis both following initial treatments with alcohol, TAA, and s. mansoni as well as following regression of fibrosis after treatment with silymarin and PZQ. High correlations were observed between the score and both grade and stage. Also, the values of AUROC inhances the potential usefulness of the index (Figure 4 and Tables 6). Within groups the index is correlated well with the corresponding histological stages, where in TAA, S.mansoni and alcoholism groups (r = 0.97, 0.84 and 0.97, respectively). Also, the data prospectively obtained from the validation set enhances the index reliability, where it matched the pathological stages and grades, which were independently assessed.
This index resulted in higher AUROC values and better identification of individual stages of fibrosis than the indices that are currently being used clinically in man. This could partly be because compared with these indices, it was studied in a more controlled and predictable environment over a shorter term. Nevertheless, its assessment in chronic liver disease in man may be warranted.
This study assessed the fibrotic changes during the progression and regression of fibrosis. It provides a new experimental, reproducible and non invasive index of liver fibrosis, formulated in a logarthmic formula, which combined 3 common routine laboratory liver specific markers in addition to GSH. The index can predict the full range of precerrhotic stages and correlated well of the histological staging and grading. Different etiologies cause liver fibrosis in man including viral infection, s mansoni, ethanol, and autoimmune diseases. This index was utilized in mice experiments that assess the development and/or treatment of fibrosis. It could be used in future rodent models to assess damage and treatment for various hepatic toxins and pathogens. If such a model could be validated in prediction of fibrosis in man, it would minimize the need for liver biopsy to assess hepatic fibrosis.
- Bataller R, Brenner DA: Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115 (4): 1100-1109. 10.1172/JCI200524282C1.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S: Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 495-500. 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castera L, Negre I, Samii K, Buffet C: Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1999, 30: 1529-1530. 10.1002/hep.510300624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, Milikowski C, Molina EG, Pyrsopoulos NT, Feng ZZ, Reddy KR, Schiff ER: Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002, 97: 2614-2618. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.06038.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colloredo G, Guido M, Sonzogni A, Leandro G: Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. J Hepatol. 2003, 39: 239-244. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00191-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, Charlotte F, Benhamou Y, Poynard T: Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001, 357: 1069-1075. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04258-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forns X, Ampurdanès S, Llovet JM, Aponte J, Quintó L, Martínez-Bauer E, Bruguera M, Sánchez-Tapias JM, Rodés J: Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology. 2002, 36 (4 Pt 1): 986-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS: Simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003, 38 (2): 518-526. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guha INParkes J, Roderick P, Chattopadhyay D, Cross R, Harris S, Kaye P, Burt AD, Ryder SD, Aithal GP, Day CP, Rosenberg WM: Noninvasive markers of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Validating the European Liver Fibrosis Panel and exploring simple markers. Hepatol. 2008, 47 (2): 455-60. 10.1002/hep.21984.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sebastiani G, Halfon P, Castera L, Pol S, Thomas DL, Mangia A, Di Marco V, Pirisi M, Voiculescu M, Guido M, Bourliere M, Noventa F, Alberti A: Safe biopsy: a validated method for large-scale staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol. 2009, 49 (6): 1821-1827. 10.1002/hep.22859.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castéra L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Le Bail B, Chanteloup E, Haaser M, Darriet M, Couzigou P, De Lédinghen V: Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005, 128 (2): 343-350. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leroy V, Hilleret MN, Sturm N, Trocme C, Renversez JC, Faure P, Morel F, Zarski JP: Prospective comparison of six non-invasive scores for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2007, 46 (5): 775-782. 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.12.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snyder N, Nguyen A, Gajula L, Soloway R, Xiao S-Y, Lau DT-Y, Petersen J: The APRI may be enhanced by the use of FIBROSpect II in the estimation of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Clin Chem Acta. 2007, 381: 119-123. 10.1016/j.cca.2007.02.046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller A, Machinc F, Zimmermann T, Schubert H: thioacetamide induced cirrhosis-like lesion in rats- usefulness and reliability of this animal model. Exp Pathol. 1988, 34: 229-236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warren KS: The pathogenesis of hepatosplenic schistosomaisis: from man to monkey to muse to molecule. Edited by: Prober H, Schanffer F. New York 1979; Grune and Stratton, 439-455.Google Scholar
- Virginie F, Evelyne A, Monique G, Samuel WF, Helene R: Effects of chronic ethanol administration on rat liver proteasome activities: Relationship with oxidative stress. Hepatol. 1999, 29 (1): 14-20. 10.1002/hep.510290106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yi-Fang Wu, Shu-Ling Fu, Cheng-Heng Kao, Chu-Wen Yang, Chao-Hsiung Lin, Ming-Ta Hsu, Ting-Fen Tsai: Chemopreventive effect of silymarin on liver pathology in HBV X protein transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (6): 2033-2042. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2450.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellman G: Plasma Antioxidant. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959, 82: 70-77. 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okhawa H, Ohishi N: Assay for lipid peroxidation in animal tissue by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979, 95: 351-358. 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergman I, Loxley : Two improved and simplified methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Anal Chem. 1963, 35: 1961-1965. 10.1021/ac60205a053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medugorac I: Myocardial collagen in different forms of heart hypertrophy in the rat. Res Exp Med. 1980, 177: 201-211. 10.1007/BF01851210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeMacedo P, Marrano C, Keillor JW: A direct continuous spectrophotometric assay for transglutanminase activity. Annal Biochem. 2000, 285: 16-20. 10.1006/abio.2000.4713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951, 193 (1): 265-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scheuer P, Chalk B: Staining methods (eds), in "Clinical tests of histopathology. 1986, Wolf medical publication Ltd (London), 84-85.Google Scholar
- Bedossa P, Poynard T: An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis. Hepatol. 1996, The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group, 24: 289-293. 10.1002/hep.510240201.Google Scholar
- Dashti H, Jeppsson B, Hagersrrand I, Hultberg B, Stinivas U, Abdulla M, Joclsson B, Bengmark S: Early biochemical and histological changes in rats exposed to a single injection of thioacetamide. Pharmacol Toxical. 1987, 60: 171-174. 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1987.tb01727.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balkan J, Dogru-Abbasoglu S, Kanbagli O, Cevikbas U, aykac-Toker G, Uysal M: Taurine has a protective effect against thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis by decreasing oxidative stress. Hum Exp Toxical. 2001, 20 (5): 251-254. 10.1191/096032701678227758.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andrews P: Praziquantel: mechanisms of anti-schistosomal activity. Pharmacol. Ther. 1985, 28: 129-156. 10.1016/0163-7258(85)90020-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie Shi-Bin, Ji-Lu Yao, Rong-Qin Zheng, Xiao-Mou Peng, Zhi-Liang , Gao ZL: Serum hyaluronic acid, procollagen type II and IV in histological diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Hepatobiliary pancreat Dis Int. 2003, 2 (1): 69-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Novitskiy G, Traore K, Wang L, Trush MA, Mezey E: Effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde on reactive oxygen species production in rat hepatic stellate cells. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006, 30 (8): 1429-35. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00171.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedman SL: Liver fibrosis from bench to bedside. J Biol Chem. 2003, 38 (1): 38-53.Google Scholar
- Mizushima T, Ochi K, Koide N: Fibrosis markers in heavy alcohol drinkers. Rinsho Byori. 2007, 55 (8): 751-757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huh JW, Kim DS, Oh YM, Shim TS, Lim CM, Lee SD, Koh Y, Kim WS, Kim WD, Kim KR: Is metalloproteinase-7 specific for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?. Chest. 2008, 133 (5): 1058-1060. 10.1378/chest.07-2116.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohamed Hessien, Mohamed Ayad, Ibrahim Wafaa M, Batoul Izzul Arab: Stepwise Deterioration of Prothrombin, Factors I, IV but Not Factor XIII in Progressive Stages of Liver Cirrhosis and HCC. Asian Journal of Medical Science. 2010, 2 (1): 1-6.Google Scholar
- Myers RP, Tainturier MH, Ratziu V, Piton A, Thibault V, Imbert-Bismut F, Messous D, Charlotte F, Di Martino V, Benhamou Y, Poynard T: Prediction of liver histological lesions with biochemical markers in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2003, 39: 222-230. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00171-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poynard T, Imbert-Bismut F, Munteanu M, Messous D, Myers RP, Thabut D, Ratziu V, Mercadier A, Benhamou Y, Hainque B: Overview of the diagnostic value of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest, HCV FibroSure) and necrosis (ActiTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Comp Hpeatol. 2004, 3 (1): 8-10.1186/1476-5926-3-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naveau S, Raynard B, Ratziu V, Abella A, Imbert-Bismut F, Messous D, Beuzen F, Capron F, Thabut D, Munteanu M, Chaput JC, Poynard T: Biomarkers for the prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005, 3 (2): 167-174. 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00625-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puoti C, Magrini A, Stati T, Rigato P, Montagnese F, Rossi P, Aldegheri L, Resta S: Clinical, histological, and virological features of hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal or abnormal alanine transaminase levels. Hepatol. 1997, 26: 1393-1398. 10.1002/hep.510260603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/10/53/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.