Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dietary habits as associated factors with irritable bowel syndrome among medical students: evidence from a cross-sectional study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 24, Article number: 268 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Research on Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) among medical students has increased globally, highlighting a high prevalence in this demographic. However, there is a lack of data specifically regarding the prevalence of IBS among medical students in Yemen. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of IBS among Yemeni medical students.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study involving medical students who completed a validated self-administered questionnaire incorporating socio-demographic information, dietary habits, smoking status, sleep patterns, and the Rome IV criteria for IBS. We used bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models to identify IBS’s associated factors, estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and average marginal effect (AME) on the predicted probability of IBS.

Results

The study included 351 medical students with a mean age of 22.53 ± 2.70 years; 39.60% (139) were females. The prevalence of IBS was 26.21% (92 students), with 67.39% (62) of them classified as IBS-M (mixed). In multivariable analysis, the consumption of carbonated soft drinks remained significantly associated with IBS (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.14–9.88; P = 0.028). In males, coffee consumption had a substantial effect on the predicted probability of IBS (AME: 11.41%; 95% CI: 0.32–22.60). In females, the consumption of carbonated soft drinks had a significant effect on the predicted probability of IBS (AME: 24.91%; 95% CI: 8.34–41.48).

Conclusion

The consumption of carbonated soft drinks is significantly associated with IBS among medical students, with a particularly notable increase in the predicted probability of IBS in females. These findings highlight the necessity for gender-specific dietary recommendations in IBS management. Further research is essential to investigate IBS in the general population to gain a comprehensive understanding of its prevalence and associated factors.

Peer Review reports

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is recognized as a highly prevalent and economically impactful gastrointestinal disorder [1, 2]. While it doesn’t lead to increased mortality, its socioeconomic impact is profound, diminishing the quality of life for those affected, necessitating additional healthcare resources, and affecting productivity. IBS is characterized as a chronic gut-brain disorder presenting with altered bowel habits, abdominal discomfort, or pain, all in the absence of organic pathology [3].

Although significant research has been done, the pathophysiological mechanisms of IBS have yet to be fully understood [4]. It is widely accepted that the disorder arises from a dynamic interaction of various factors—dietary patterns, psychological stress, gut microbiota alterations, and genetic predispositions. Environmental influences and lifestyle choices also play pivotal roles in the manifestation and exacerbation of IBS symptoms [5].

The prevalence of IBS varies worldwide, influenced by geographic factors and the criteria used for diagnosis. In a global analysis of six studies employing the Rome IV criteria, encompassing 34 countries and 82,476 individuals, the prevalence of IBS was found to be 3.8% (95% CI: 3.1–4.5%; I²=96.6%) [6].

Among medical students, the prevalence of IBS ranged from 9.3 to 35.5% when diagnosed using the Rome III criteria [7]. Crucially, there is no definitive diagnostic test or biomarker for IBS, and its diagnosis relies solely on clinical assessment. The criteria for diagnosing IBS have evolved over time, from the Manning criteria in the 1970s to the current Rome IV criteria [8].

Medical students encounter distinctive challenges relative to other university students. They consistently experience high levels of stress, extended study hours, substantial workloads, sleep deprivation, elevated caffeine consumption, and difficulties in maintaining their social lives [9, 10]. In Yemen, the convergence of societal stressors with ongoing political instability and infrastructural deficits amplifies the relevance of studying IBS among medical students [11]. Yemeni medical students face a unique array of challenges, including the demanding task of mastering a complex curriculum in a non-native language and managing the financial burden of their education. These factors create a distinctive context that may significantly influence the prevalence and characteristics of IBS within this group, underscoring the importance of this study in understanding and addressing the condition in such a challenging environment. Previous studies reported that fewer males have IBS compared to females [6, 12]. Despite the global increase in research on IBS among medical students, the prevalence and associated factors specific to Yemeni medical students, as well as the sex-specific effects of these factors, such as dietary habits on the IBS, remain understudied. This research aimed to fill this gap by studying the prevalence of IBS and its associated factors among medical students at Ibb University, Yemen. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the factors associated with IBS, stratified by sex.

Methods

Study design and setting

This cross-sectional observational study was carried out from September 2022 to March 2023 among students enrolled at the Faculty of Medicine, Ibb University, Ibb governorate, Yemen. This time frame was selected to accommodate academic schedules and ensure maximum student participation.

Participants

Our study encompassed medical students of Ibb University from the first to the sixth year. We included all full-time medical students at the university during the study period and provided informed consent. We excluded the female students who reported abdominal pain or discomfort related to the menstrual cycle, students who reported organic gastrointestinal disorders, a family history of cancer, inexplicable weight loss, anaemia, bloody stools, abnormal laboratory results, other alarming signs, and individuals with a history of gastrointestinal surgery.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated using the subsequent equation: [n = Z2 × P × (1-P) / d2], with a 95% confidence interval, power of 80%, and precision of 0.04, assuming a prevalence of 15% [13].

Where:

Z = 1.96 (Z-score for a 95% confidence level)

P = 15% (estimated prevalence of IBS)

Q = 1 - P

N = PQ / (SE2) = PQ / (d/Z)2 = (Z2 × PQ) / d2

Substituting the values:

$${\rm{N}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,{\rm{((1}}{\rm{.96}}{{\rm{)}}^2}\, \times \,{\rm{0}}{\rm{.15}} \times (1 - 0.15))/{(0.04)^2}\, \approx \,306.34$$

To ensure reliability, we enrolled 351 medical students in the study.

Data collection and definitions of IBS and other covariates

Data collection was executed through a structured and validated self-assessment questionnaire. For efficient administration and clarification of the questionnaire content, a student from each academic year was recruited and trained. Their role was to elucidate the study’s purpose and assist in data gathering. The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part collected socio-demographic and lifestyle information (supplementary file 2), including age, sex, academic year, body mass index (BMI), employment status (employed or not), and living arrangements (with family or independently).

Additionally, it explored sleep patterns (early or late), dietary habits, food preferences (including fast food, fatty food, and legumes), beverage consumption (carbonated soft drinks, tea, and coffee), and smoking status (current smoker or not). Students were categorized based on their year in the medical program: junior (first three years) and senior (fourth year onwards). We categorized students as coffee drinkers, tea drinkers, and carbonated soft drink drinkers based on their daily consumption of these beverages. Additionally, we categorized eating patterns as either quick, characterized by rapidly finishing a meal, or slow, involving the unhurried enjoyment of meals at a more relaxed pace.

The second part included the Arabic version of the Rome IV criteria questionnaire [3, 14], which diagnoses IBS based on the presence of recurrent abdominal pain/discomfort for at least one day per week during the past three months, persisting for at least six months, along with two or more of the following: (i) the pain’s relationship to defecation, (ii) a change in stool frequency, and (iii) a change in stool appearance. The Rome IV Criteria for IBS diagnosis have an excellent specificity of 97.1% and a moderate sensitivity of 62.7% [15]. Considering the self-assessment format of the study questionnaire, the second part concluded with binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ questions designed to identify and exclude red flag symptoms as outlined in the exclusion criteria. The subtypes of IBS were categorized based on stool consistency as follows: IBS with constipation (IBS-C) was characterized by experiencing hard or lumpy stools in the majority of bowel movements. Conversely, IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) involves having loose or watery stools in the majority of bowel movements. Mixed IBS (IBS-M) was identified when individuals experienced a mix of hard or lumpy and loose or watery stools, occurring with similar frequencies over time. Un-subtyped or unknown IBS (IBS-U) was used to describe cases where stool consistency did not consistently align with the patterns of IBS-C, IBS-D, or IBS-M, indicating a lack of sufficient deviation in stool consistency to meet the criteria of these subtypes [16].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted utilizing STATA version 17.0. General characteristics were presented using descriptive statistics, including total counts and percentages. Group comparisons were assessed using either Pearson’s χ² test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables were evaluated using t-tests, wherein findings were displayed using mean values and standard deviations (SD). Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent associations with IBS in comparison to the control group without IBS [17]. The findings were reported as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). We explored the average marginal effects (AME) in the predicted probability of developing IBS, adjusted for confounders included in the multivariable model. AME was calculated separately for males and females to elucidate potential sex-specific effects of significant predictors. All p-values reported in the study were calculated using a two-tailed test, and statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Out of 450 questionnaires distributed, 351 participants responded, resulting in a response rate of 78%. Among these participants, 60.40% (212) were males, and 39.60% (139) were females. The mean age of the respondents was 22.53 years (SD 2.70). Furthermore, 55.84% (196) of the participants were juniors, while 44.16% (155) were seniors (Table 1).

Table 1 General characteristics of the population
Full size table

Prevalence of IBS and characteristics of students with and without IBS

The prevalence of IBS in the study population was 26.21% (92), and the predominant type was mixed bowel habit (IBS-M), 67.39% (62) of IBS patients. IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) accounted for 23.91% [22], and IBS with constipation (IBS-C) made up 8.70% [8] of the IBS patients.

The female students exhibited a significantly higher IBS prevalence (32.37%) compared to their male counterparts (22.17%). The Senior students displayed a notably significantly increased prevalence of IBS (31.61%) compared to junior students (21.94%). The students living in their family homes showed a significantly higher prevalence of IBS (30.95%) compared to students living independently (19.15%). The students who consumed carbonated soft drinks had a significantly higher IBS prevalence (28.21%) compared to non-consumers (10.26%). Similarly, students who consumed coffee exhibited a significantly higher IBS prevalence (28.82%) in contrast to non-consumers (14.29%).

Association between covariates and IBS

In the univariate analysis, major variables were investigated for their potential associations with the prevalence of IBS. Age showed a marginally non-significant association with IBS, where participants aged 22 years or older had 57% higher odds of having IBS compared to their younger counterparts (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57, 95% CI: 0.98–2.54). The female gender exhibited 68% higher odds of IBS compared to males (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.04–2.72, p = 0.034). The senior students showed significantly higher odds of having IBS compared to juniors (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02–2.65, p = 0.042). The living arrangement showed a protective association, where individuals living without family had lower odds of IBS (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.317–0.88, p = 0.014). Regarding dietary habits, coffee consumption was significantly associated with higher odds of IBS (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.15–5.14, p = 0.020) when compared to non-consumers. Similarly, consumption of carbonated soft drinks was strongly associated with higher odds of IBS (OR = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.15–5.14, p = 0.023) in contrast to non-consumers (Table 2). Other factors were not found to be significantly associated with IBS.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association between IBS and participant’s characteristics
Full size table

In the multivariate analysis, subsequent to controlling for factors including age, gender, academic stage, living arrangement, coffee consumption, and eaten fatty food, the consumption of carbonated soft drinks was strongly associated with a higher odd of IBS (OR = 3.35; 95% CI: 1.14–9.88, p = 0.028) (Table 2).

Average marginal effects (AME)

Based on the significant association observed in Table 2, we investigated the AMEs of the potential factors on the predicted probability of IBS adjusted for the confounders in the multivariable model in Table 2.

Overall, the coffee consumption (AME: 11.84%; 95% CI: 0.83–22.84) and carbonated soft drinks consumption (AME: 17.78%; 95% CI: 7.03–28.53) had a significant effect on the predicted probability of IBS. In males, coffee consumption had a substantial effect on the predicted probability of IBS (AME: 11.41%; 95% CI: 0.32–22.60). In females, the consumption of carbonated soft drinks had a significant effect on the predicted probability of IBS (AME: 24.91%; 95% CI: 8.34–41.48) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Estimated Average marginal effects with 95% CIs with respect to sex, academic level, accommodation, coffee, and carbonated beverage consumption. A: overall; B: Males; C: Females

Full size image

Discussion

IBS is a chronic condition involving the gut-brain axis, marked by changes in bowel habits and abdominal pain or discomfort, occurring without any detectable organic disease. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the prevalence of IBS among Yemeni medical students. The current study used Rome IV to diagnose IBS and identify independently associated factors, providing a platform for understanding the current magnitude of IBS and prioritizing future research efforts.

Our findings showed a high prevalence of IBS among Yemeni medical students, with 26.21% of the participants meeting the IBS’s Rome IV criteria. The mixed bowel habit (IBS-M) was the predominant subtype, affecting 68.48% of the IBS patients. In a cross-sectional study, the prevalence of IBS was 6.6% among medical students, based on Rome IV criteria [18]. Similarly, a study showed that the prevalence of IBS was 7.9% among medical students; based on Rome IV criteria, IBS constipation (IBS-C) was the predominant subtype, affecting 31.5%, followed by the mixed bowel habit (IBS-M), affecting 28.8% of the IBS patients [19]. Another descriptive-analytical study showed that 14% of medical students had IBS; based on Rome IV criteria, IBS constipation (IBS-C) was the predominant subtype, affecting 36.4%, followed by the diarrhoea bowel habit (IBS-D), affecting 25% of the IBS patients [20].

In contrast, the 26.21% prevalence rate of IBS among Yemeni medical students is relatively higher than that found in other regions, particularly Western countries [21]. This elevated prevalence rate may be attributed to the increased stress and burden experienced by Yemeni medical students due to the ongoing war. However, a recent cross-sectional study among Lebanese adults aged 18 years and older reported an IBS prevalence of 46.8%, which is higher than our findings [22]. Discrepancies between these results and ours may be due to various factors: differences in the demographic composition of the samples in the Lebanese study, variations in socio-cultural contexts between the two populations, differences in the study periods, and methodological variances, such as our offline data collection supervised by our research team versus their use of social media for data collection.

Likewise, in another cross-sectional study, 400 medical students were diagnosed with IBS using the Rome III criteria questionnaire. The study revealed that 121 students tested positive, resulting in an IBS frequency of 31.7% among the medical students. However, when examining the subtypes of IBS, it was determined that 26.6% of the cases were of the diarrhoea-predominant subtype (IBS-D) [23].

Similarly, a systemic review study diagnosed 7988 medical students with IBS using the Rome III criteria questionnaire; the prevalence of IBS among medical students ranged from 9.3 to 35.5% [7]. Several research studies alongside our study indicate that the rate of IBS prevalence varies according to the diagnostic tool and countries, with a higher prevalence in diagnosis based on Rome III criteria [24, 25]. In a comparison between the two criteria for IBS diagnosis (Rome III vs. Rome IV), Bai et al. found a substantially lower prevalence rate using Rome IV criteria (6.1% vs. 12.4% using Rome III criteria). They concluded that Rome IV-positive IBS patients represented a subgroup of Rome III-positive patients with more severe symptoms [26]. The relatively high IBS prevalence among medical students may be attributed to their stressful learning environment.

Dietary factors associated with IBS

Our study found a significant positive association between the consumption of carbonated soft drinks and IBS. This result aligns with previous findings that showed a higher carbonated soft drinks intake among individuals with IBS compared to controls. Additionally, another study reported more gastrointestinal complaints induced by carbonated beverages in subjects with IBS compared to controls. Thus, the higher intake of carbonated beverages may be linked to IBS symptoms due to the presence of caffeine or other components in these drinks.

Furthermore, our study observed that coffee consumption was nearly significantly associated with higher odds of experiencing IBS. This finding is supported by another study that investigated the link between adult coffee consumption and IBS. The study concluded that individuals who consumed coffee weekly or more frequently had a higher risk of experiencing IBS compared to non-consumers [27]. The impact of carbonated beverages and coffee consumption has been linked to the manifestation of IBS [28].

Covariate factors that affect the predicted probability of developing IBS

Overall, our research established a significant link between coffee consumption and carbonated soft drinks consumption and an increased likelihood of experiencing IBS. Interestingly, this effect varies by sex. We observed that men who regularly consume coffee seem to face an increased likelihood of experiencing symptoms associated with IBS. In contrast, women are more adversely affected by carbonated soft drinks, with these beverages being more closely linked to an increase in IBS symptoms. This disparity might be attributed to ingredients such as sugars or artificial sweeteners found in soft drinks, which are known to affect digestion and nutrient absorption [29]. The findings of our study highlighted the critical importance of individualized dietary guidance in the management of IBS. The findings also suggest that dietary recommendations for managing IBS may need to be tailored distinctly for men and women, considering their differing responses to beverages like coffee and carbonated soft drinks.

Clinical implication

Our study contributes to expanding the understanding of IBS in medical education setting, emphasizing the importance of considering dietary habits when addressing the prevalence of IBS among medical students. The significant associations with carbonated soft drinks and the near-significant link with coffee consumption suggest that lifestyle modifications could be beneficial. Clinicians can advise medical students to make healthier dietary choices and reduce their intake of these beverages to lower their risk of IBS. This reduction could also decrease the impact of IBS on their education, as symptoms can lead to increased absenteeism and hinder their academic performance.

Limitations

The study design as a cross-sectional poses limitations regarding the establishment of causality, thus warranting further longitudinal investigations to explore the dynamic nature of IBS within the specific population.

Noteworthy is that data collection relied on self-reported responses, which may be subjected to recall bias and social desirability bias. Additionally, since the study was conducted at a single institution, caution should be considered when generalizing the findings to other populations. Furthermore, it is essential to consider that additional factors not investigated in this study, such as stress levels, exercise, and genetic predispositions, may contribute to the occurrence of IBS among medical students and merit investigations in future research.

For all limitations mentioned previously, we recommend that future research address these gaps and employ longitudinal design to establish casual relationships. Furthermore, involving diverse populations from multiple institutions will provide more reliable data, offering a more thorough comprehension of the complex nature of IBS in medical students.

Conclusion

Our study revealed a high prevalence of IBS among Yemeni medical students, with dietary factors like carbonated soft drinks and coffee playing a significant role. Notably, these associations varied by sex, with our findings indicating that regular coffee consumption increases the risk of developing IBS symptoms, particularly among males. Conversely, consumption of carbonated soft drinks significantly elevates the risk of IBS symptoms in females. These results underscore the importance of personalized dietary recommendations in managing IBS, considering the varying impact of sex-specific dietary habits. They highlight the need for tailored interventions and heightened awareness of IBS among medical students, emphasizing dietary choices and stress management. Further research is necessary to evaluate how IBS affects the quality of life and academic performance of medical students. Additionally, studies aimed at estimating the prevalence of IBS in the general Yemeni population and identifying other associated factors are warranted to enhance understanding and management of this condition.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AME:

Average marginal effect

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

IBS:

Irritable bowel syndrome

IBS-C:

IBS with constipation

IBS-C:

IBS with constipation

IBS-D:

IBS with diarrhea

IBS-M:

Mixed IBS

IBS-U:

Un-subtyped IBS

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Talley NJJBP, Gastroenterology RC. Irritable bowel syndrome: definition, diagnosis and epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;13(3):371–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sperber AD, Bangdiwala SI, Drossman DA, Ghoshal UC, Simren M, Tack J, et al. Worldwide prevalence and burden of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Results Rome Foundation Global Study. 2021;160(1):99–114. e3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lacy BE, Mearin F, Chang L, Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Simren M, et al. Bowel Disorders Gastroenterol. 2016;150(6):1393–407. e5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee YJ, Park KSJWW. Irritable bowel syndrome: emerging paradigm in pathophysiology. World J Gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(10):2456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Oświęcimska J, Szymlak A, Roczniak W, Girczys-Połedniok K, Kwiecień JJA. New insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Adv Med Sci. 2017;62(1):17–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oka P, Parr H, Barberio B, Black CJ, Savarino EV, Ford ACJTG, et al. Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. 2020;5(10):908–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibrahim NKJTJG. A systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors of irritable bowel syndrome among medical students. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27(1):10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palsson OS, Whitehead WE, Van Tilburg MA, Chang L, Chey W, Crowell MD, et al. Development and validation of the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for adults. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1481–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qureshi SR, Abdelaal AM, Janjua ZA, Alasmari HA, Obad AS, Alamodi A et al. Irritable bowel syndrome: a global challenge among medical students. Cureus 2016;8(8).

  10. Farah R, Khamis N, Sneineh AA, Khatib A, Haddadin S, Darwish M et al. Prevalence and predictors of irritable bowel syndrome among medical students. 2022;56(1).

  11. Ahmad H, Hanafi IJJTJTAPI. The Yemeni Civil War’s impact on the Socio-Cultural conditions of the people in Yemen. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam. 2023;19(1):145–58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YS. Kim NJJon, motility. Sex-gender differences in irritable bowel syndrome. 2018;24(4):544.

  13. Kadam P, Bhalerao SJIA. Sample size calculation. Int J Ayurveda Res. 2010;1(1):55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. AlButaysh OF, AlQuraini AA, Almukhaitah AA, Alahmdi YM, Alharbi, FSJSJoGOJotSGA. Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome and its associated factors in Saudi undergraduate students. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(2):89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Simren M, Palsson OS, Whitehead WEJC. Update on Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders: implications for clinical practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacy BE, Patel NKJJ. Rome criteria and a diagnostic approach to irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Med. 2017;6(11):99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farah R, Khamis N, Sneineh AA, Khatib A, Haddadin S, Darwish M et al. Prevalence and predictors of irritable bowel syndrome among medical students. Jordan Med J 2022;56(1).

  19. Hakami RM, Elmakki E, Hasanain T, Alnami A, Khawaji A, Ali L, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome: assessment of prevalence and risk factors in Saudi University students using Rome IV Criteria. Gastroenterol Insights. 2019;10(1):8239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sehonou J, Dodo LRSJPAMJ. Profil Clinique et facteurs associés Au syndrome de l’intestin irritable chez les étudiants en médecine à Cotonou, Bénin. Pan Afr Med J2018;31(1).

  21. Anthea P, Tiziana F, Francesca P, Pierre EJTUMJ. Prevalence, behaviours and burden of irritable bowel syndrome in medical students and junior doctors. Ulster Med J. 2021;90(1):16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yazbeck G, Malaeb D, Shaaban H, Sarray El Dine A, Hallit S, Hallit RJBPH. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) among Lebanese adults: unidentified IBS and associated factors. 2023;23(1):1589.

  23. Elhosseiny D, Mahmoud NE, Manzour AFJJEPHA. Factors associated with irritable bowel syndrome among medical students at Ain Shams University. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2019;94:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung HJ, Park MI, Moon W, Park SJ, Kim HH, Noh EJ, et al. Are food constituents relevant to the irritable bowel syndrome in young adults?-a Rome III based prevalence study of the Korean medical students. J Neurogastroenterology Motil. 2011;17(3):294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Y, Liu L, Yang Y, He Y, Zhang Y, Wang M et al. A school-based study of irritable bowel syndrome in medical students in beijing, China: prevalence and some related factors. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014;2014.

  26. Bai T, Xia J, Jiang Y, Cao H, Zhao Y, Zhang L, et al. Comparison of the Rome IV and Rome III criteria for IBS diagnosis: a cross-sectional survey. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(5):1018–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koochakpoor G, Salari-Moghaddam A, Keshteli AH, Esmaillzadeh A, Adibi PJFN. Association of coffee and caffeine intake with irritable bowel syndrome in adults. Front Nutr. 2021;8:632469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Torres MJ, Sabate J-M, Bouchoucha M, Buscail C, Hercberg S, Julia CJT. Food consumption and dietary intakes in 36,448 adults and their association with irritable bowel syndrome: Nutrinet-Sante study. Therapeutic Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1756283X17746625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nilholm C, Larsson E, Roth B, Gustafsson R, Ohlsson BJN. Irregular dietary habits with a high intake of cereals and sweets are associated with more severe gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS patients. Nutrients. 2019;11(6):1279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our profound gratitude to our research assistants – Zakaria Mohsen Al-Hilali, Ammar Mohammed Ameen Abu-asba’a, Anas Abdullah Ghundal, Amin Al-Atab, and Jobran Moteaa Ahmed Alasaaydi – for their exceptional support in distributing and collecting the questionnaires. Their unwavering dedication and assistance were pivotal to the successful completion of our research.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2021ZDLSF02-06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Mueataz A. Mahyoub, Yarui Li, Mudan Ren & Shuixiang He

  2. Clinical Medical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (Oncology) of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Mueataz A. Mahyoub, Yarui Li, Mudan Ren & Shuixiang He

  3. Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Thamar University, Thamar, Yemen

    Mueataz A. Mahyoub, Yarui Li, Mudan Ren & Shuixiang He

  4. Department of Human Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jibla University for Medical and Health Sciences, Jibla, Yemen

    Osama Abbas

  5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Mohamed Elhoumed & Sarah Al-Qurmoti

  6. Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health Research (INRSP), Nouakchott BP. 695, Nouakchott, Mauritania

    Mohamed Elhoumed

  7. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen

    Saif Ghabisha

  8. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Disease of Ministry of Education, Health Science Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

    Moath Refat

  9. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thamar University, Thamar, Yemen

    Mustafa Abbas

Authors
  1. Mueataz A. Mahyoub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Osama Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Elhoumed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saif Ghabisha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Moath Refat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mustafa Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sarah Al-Qurmoti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yarui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mudan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shuixiang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A.M.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, data curation, formal analysis, and writing the original draft. O.A.: Questionnaire distribution and supervision, data collection, and data entry. M.E.: Data analysis, review, and editing. S.G.: Data collection, review, and supervision. M.R.: review and editing. M.A.: data collection, review, and editing. S.A.Q.: Data analysis, review, and editing. Y.R.L.: review, editing, and supervision. M.D.R: review, editing, and supervision. S.X.H.: conceptualization, methodology, review and editing, and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mudan Ren or Shuixiang He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Ibb University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science number (IBBUNI.AC.YEM.2022.102). All methods were carried out following relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants after they were fully informed about the study’s objectives. They were assured of the confidentiality of all data provided, with a guarantee that no personally identifying information would be utilized in the research (supplementary file 1).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahyoub, M.A., Abbas, O., Elhoumed, M. et al. Dietary habits as associated factors with irritable bowel syndrome among medical students: evidence from a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 24, 268 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03320-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03320-w

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us