Skip to main content
Download PDF

Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in elderly patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study from a tertiary center

BMC Gastroenterology volume 24, Article number: 219 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of adequate models specifically designed for elderly patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to predict the risk of death. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the overall survival of SAP in elderly patients.

Methods

Elderly patients diagnosed with SAP between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022 were included in the study. Risk factors were identified through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis. Subsequently, a novel nomogram model was developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using metrics such as the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

A total of 326 patients were included in the analysis, with 260 in the survival group and 66 in the deceased group. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that age, respiratory rate, arterial pH, total bilirubin, and calcium were independent prognostic factors for the survival of SAP patients. The nomogram demonstrated a performance comparable to sequential organ failure assessment (P = 0.065). Additionally, the calibration curve showed satisfactory predictive accuracy, and the DCA highlighted the clinical application value of the nomogram.

Conclusion

We have identified key demographic and laboratory parameters that are associated with the survival of elderly patients with SAP. These parameters have been utilized to create a precise and user-friendly nomogram, which could be an effective and valuable clinical tool for clinicians.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP), characterized by rapid progression, multiple organ failure, and high mortality, is a common inflammatory disease of pancreas worldwide [1]. While most cases are mild, with a global incidence ranging from 8 to 50 cases per 100,000 individuals annually [2], a significant proportion of patients (15–35%) will experience a severe episode with mortality rates reaching up to 30% [3]. Studies have shown that patients diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) may experience improved outcomes through enhanced monitoring, prompt aggressive fluid resuscitation, and early enteral feeding [4, 5]. Early diagnosis and accurate assessment of disease severity are essential for timely intervention.

In recent years, various scoring systems have been used for risk stratification in AP, including sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and Ranson [6]. However, these systems have drawbacks such as complexity, lack of convenience, and suboptimal accuracy. Recent studies have suggested that C-reactive protein [7], red blood cell distribution width [8], and D-dimer [9] may serve as potential predictors of hospital mortality in SAP. Nevertheless, there is inconsistency in the thresholds of these individual predictors across different studies.

A nomogram is a useful mathematical tool used to predict certain outcomes, such as disease progression or mortality, based on various key parameters [10]. While some studies have created nomograms to predict in-hospital mortality of AP using critical care databases [11, 12], their main limitations were small sample sizes and lack of external validation. These studies have identified age as an independent risk factor for death in AP patients. According to Gardner et al., individuals aged 70 years and older are identified as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with SAP [13]. While AP presents similarly in both younger and older patients, certain characteristics are unique to the elderly population. In cases of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, elderly patients face a higher likelihood of complications, including multisystem failure [14]. As a result, it is recommended that these patients receive closer monitoring and more aggressive treatment. However, there is a lack of systematic models specifically designed for elderly patients with SAP to predict in-hospital mortality.

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors capable of predicting hospital mortality in elderly patients with SAP and to construct a practical and efficient nomogram model. This model aims to equip clinicians with valuable personalized intervention information in advance.

Methods

Study design and eligibility

This retrospective study was carried out in an 81-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary teaching hospital in Jiangsu Province, China. The research adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the amended Declaration of Helsinki. Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital (No. 2,023,035), and written informed consent was not required due to the retrospective nature of the study. Patient information was de-identified and anonymized prior to analysis.

The study population consisted of patients admitted to the ICU between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, with severe pancreatitis. Patients who were transferred to the ICU due to worsening of their condition during hospitalization were excluded from the analysis. The diagnosis of AP was confirmed if at least two of three criteria were met: abdominal pain, elevated levels of amylase or lipase exceeding three times the upper limit of normal, or abdominal imaging findings consistent with AP, according to the 2012 revised Atlanta criteria [15]. SAP was defined as the presence of persistent organ failure (> 48 h) in patients. Organ failure was defined by a Marshall score of ≥ 2, indicating that at least one organ system (respiratory, cardiovascular, renal) must be affected. The inclusion criteria for this study required participants to be aged 65 years or older and have complete laboratory parameters and clinical data available within 24 h of admission. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, malignant tumors, history of pancreatic surgery, and history of abdominal trauma. The patients were then divided into two groups: those who survived (n = 260) and those who died (n = 66). The flow chart illustrating patient selection can be found in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of patient enrollment. ICU, intensive care unit

Full size image

Data collection

The data were collected from the electronic medical record archives and included demographic features (gender, age), height, weight, past medical history, as well as vital signs on admission including respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Additionally, the SOFA scores on admission were also recorded. The laboratory indices extracted for analysis included red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, serum sodium, serum potassium, serum calcium, glucose, creatinine, albumin, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, triglycerides, cholesterol, serum amylase, serum lipase, and arterial blood gas analysis. The arterial blood gas analysis encompassed arterial pH, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), and lactic acid.

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normal distribution for measurement data. Normally distributed data were expressed as means ± standard deviation, and the skewed distributed data was reported as medians (quartiles). The two groups were compared using t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Categorical data were expressed as a percentage, using χ 2 or Fisher’s exact probability tests. The study employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method to determine the key predictors for hospital mortality. Following this, a nomogram was developed using a multivariate logistic regression model with the identified variables.

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) were utilized to assess the predictive accuracy of the developed nomogram. A calibration curve was used to evaluate the concordance between the predicted probabilities and the observed outcomes. The net reclassification improvement (NRI) was utilized for comparing the predictive accuracy of the nomogram and SOFA, while the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was employed to determine the efficacy of the enhancements. The clinical relevance of the prediction model was evaluated through decision-curve analysis (DCA). All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.6.1, CRAN) and SPSS (version 24.0, Chicago, IL). A P-value < 0.05 means significant statistical difference.

Results

Baseline characteristics and outcomes

Out of the 356 SAP patients who met the inclusion criteria during the study period, 30 were excluded for various reasons (2 patients were pregnant, 15 had advanced tumors, 6 had a history of pancreatic surgery, and 7 had a history of abdominal trauma). Ultimately, 326 patients were selected, with 260 in the survival group and 66 in the deceased group (Fig. 1). The in-hospital mortality rate in our study was 20.25%.

Among all the characteristics, age, cholelithiasis, RR, SBP, DBP, SOFA, platelet, total bilirubin, serum calcium, creatinine, albumin, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and arterial pH differed significantly between the two groups (P < 0.05). Other baseline clinicopathological data were similar between the two groups, as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of selected patients
Full size table

Construction of a predictive nomogram

The variables identified were further analyzed using LASSO binary logistic regression with a lambda selected based on the 1 standard error criteria (Fig. 2A and B). A total of 12 independent risk factors associated with hospital mortality were identified, which included age, cholelithiasis, RR, SBP, arterial pH, lactic acid, platelet, neutrophil, total bilirubin, potassium, calcium, and albumin upon admission for patients who survived compared to those who did not. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted on these 12 variables, leading to the development of a multi-factor risk model through the stepwise backward method (Table 2). Age, RR, arterial pH, total bilirubin, and calcium were then integrated to create a novel predictive nomogram (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Identification of the risk factors of hospital mortality by LASSO regression (A) Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator coefficient profiles of the 41 variables. (B) Tuning parameter selection in the LASSO model used 10-foldcross validation via minimum criteria. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was plotted versus log(λ). Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the optimal values by using the minimum criteria and the 1 standard error of the minimum criteria

Full size image
Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the predictors for hospital mortality
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Predictive nomogram for the probability of hospital mortality in elderly SAP patients. SAP, severe acute pancreatitis

Full size image

Evaluation and validation of the nomogram

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the nomogram model. Upon visual examination of the AUC, the nomogram model demonstrated superior performance compared to SOFA score. However, the AUC values of nomogram and SOFA score were 0.794 and 0.710, respectively, with no statistically difference (P = 0.065, Fig. 4A). The parameters of the ROC curves at the nomogram cut-off point are shown in Table 3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(A) The receiver operating characteristic curves. (B) The calibration curves. (C) The decision curves

Full size image
Table 3 Comparison of the nomogram model and SOFA for predicting the hospital mortality
Full size table

To validate the model’s performance internally, bootstrapping technique was utilized. the calibration plot visually demonstrates a strong agreement between the predicted and actual in-hospital mortality (Fig. 4B). In this study, the IDI was 0.030 (95% CI − 0.042 to 0.102), indicating no significant difference (P = 0.415) in performance between the nomogram model and SOFA score. Additionally, the NRI value was − 0.012 (95% CI − 0.177 to 0.154), with no significant difference (P = 0.891) (Table 3). Figure 4C illustrates the net benefit of using the nomogram model and SOFA score, showing several overlaps where the net benefit of the nomogram model was comparable to that of SOFA score. The DCA demonstrated that the nomogram exhibited a superior overall net benefit across a broad and practical range of threshold probabilities, as illustrated in Fig. 4C. Furthermore, clinical interventions guided by our nomogram showed a higher net benefit compared to the SOFA score when the threshold probability ranged from 0.2 to 0.8.

Discussion

Most patients with AP will recover spontaneously without any organ failure, while approximately 20% of cases will progress to a severe form that is linked to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, sepsis, and high mortality [16]. Age is a well-established factor associated with negative outcomes in AP patients, especially in the elderly [17]. To the best knowledge, this is the first study to develop a systematic nomogram specifically tailored for elderly patients with SAP. In our study, we identified 5 predictors, including age, RR, arterial pH, total bilirubin, and calcium, as independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality of SAP in elderly patients. The nomogram demonstrated excellent performance in predicting in-hospital mortality of SAP. Furthermore, our nomogram exhibited similar discrimination and clinical applicability when compared to the traditional SOFA system.

The current clinical evaluation indicators for the severity and prognosis of SAP include the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and Ranson score. SOFA and APACHE II are widely used prognostic tools in the ICU setting to predict severity and mortality [18]. However, a limitation of both SOFA and APACHE II is that they rely on numerous variables that are not routinely collected upon general hospital admission [19, 20]. On the other hand, the Ranson score necessitates 48 h of inpatient observation [21], leading to delayed triage and management. Some studies have indicated that CT images can diagnose and assess the severity of SAP, but these features typically manifest in abdominal CT scans of AP patients 48 h after onset [22], with limited predictive value within the first 24 h. The nomogram model stands out due to its simplicity and accuracy, requiring only five parameters that do not involve additional calculations and are easily accessible to clinicians. Apart from age, other risk factors can be modified through timely and aggressive treatment, which is crucial for enhancing patient outcomes.

Older age has long been recognized as a significant indicator of poor prognosis in AP [23], as evidenced by its inclusion in both the APACHE II score and Ranson score as a predictive factor. This association is likely attributed to the higher likelihood of comorbid conditions as age increases [24]. In elderly patients with limited organ reserve, there is a chronic inflammatory state present, leading to a higher incidence of adverse events [25]. Our research findings indicated that the hospital mortality rate for older patients with SAP was 20.25%, consistent with existing literature [26]. Additionally, age was identified as an independent risk factor in our study, underscoring the importance for clinicians to closely monitor older patients with poorer prognoses associated with advanced age.

There is substantial evidence supporting the significance of RR as a key physiological indicator in severely ill patients and in the worsening of clinical symptoms [27]. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) has been identified as the primary form of organ failure in both early and late stages of AP [1]. In a retrospective study of 813,120 hospitalized AP patients, Gajendran et al. found ARF in 21,415 cases (2.63%), with a corresponding mortality rate of 17% [28]. SAP can often be complicated by ARF, leading to increased mortality [29]. The study highlights the importance of RR as a critical prognostic factor for hospital mortality, emphasizing the need for clinicians to promptly identify the underlying causes of increased respiratory rate and provide personalized treatment.

The association between acidosis and an increase in multiple organ failure and mortality for intensive care patients has been well-documented. A study found that severe metabolic or mixed acidosis, defined by a plasma pH lower than 7.20, occurs in 6% of critically ill patients within the first 24 h in the ICU, and was linked to high mortality rates [30]. However, there is limited research of acidosis on predicting SAP. In a prospective study focusing on young and middle-aged patients, Sharma discovered that those with metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.35) had higher rates of organ failure, interventions, and mortality [31]. Our study further supports this by highlighting that arterial pH at presentation could be a valuable early indicator for predicting hospital mortality in elderly patients with SAP.

Total bilirubin was identified as a significant predictor for mortality in AP, a finding that had been supported by numerous studies [27]. Prior research has shown that in cases of AP, obstruction of the bile duct could impede the excretion of bile, leading to the accumulation of bilirubin in liver cells [32]. This accumulation disrupts the normal metabolic processes of the liver cells, ultimately resulting in their degeneration, necrosis, and impaired function. Elevated bilirubin levels are associated with a poor outcome [33]. Our study similarly revealed that total bilirubin serves as a risk factor for hospital mortality in elderly SAP patients.

Hypocalcemia is a crucial element in Ranson’s scoring system used to evaluate the severity of pancreatitis [34]. Research indicates that the level of calcium plays a significant role in both the exocrine functions of the pancreas and the pathological progression of AP. A study by Chhabra et al. found that patients with hypocalcemia during AP had a notably higher incidence of persistent organ failure, need for intervention, and mortality compared to those with normal serum calcium levels [35]. The suggested mechanisms for hypocalcemia in the early phase include autodigestion of mesenteric fat by pancreatic enzymes leading to the release of free fatty acids that form calcium salts, transient hypoparathyroidism, and hypomagnesemia [36]. Nonetheless, our study also identified calcium as an independent predictor of hospital mortality for elderly SAP patients.

This retrospective study investigated mortality risk factors in elderly patients with SAP and developed a nomogram for precise prediction of in-hospital mortality. The SOFA score has been identified as a valuable tool for predicting short-term mortality in critically ill patients [37]. Additionally, the SOFA score has shown higher specificity in predicting ICU hospitalization rates and mortality in SAP patients compared to the APACHE II score [38]. The nomogram developed in this study demonstrated comparable predictive performance for hospital mortality in elderly patients compared to the SOFA score. Moreover, DCA was used to assess the clinical effectiveness of nomogram-guided medical interventions for elderly patients with SAP. The findings indicated that nomogram-guided interventions yielded greater net benefits than the SOFA score when the threshold probability ranged from 0.2 to 0.8.

Our study still has some limitations. Firstly, this study was retrospective, which means that selection and detection bias could exist. To improve the level of evidence, prospective studies are needed. Secondly, this was a single-center retrospective study that was only internally validated and lacked external validation. Therefore, our findings will need to be confirmed through studies on larger, multi-center cohorts. Thirdly, the nomogram only considers examination indicators at admission, not the dynamic changes in these indicators. Clinicians usually assess the patient’s condition sequentially and modify treatment strategies accordingly. Finally, despite our efforts to adjust for confounding factors through multivariate logistic regression analysis, there may still be residual confounding factors from unknown or unmeasured covariates that have not been completely ruled out.

Conclusion

A nomogram model was developed for elderly patients, incorporating clinical and laboratory parameters measured upon admission to predict SAP mortality accurately. This tool shows promise in aiding clinicians to tailor individualized treatment plans for these patients, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes, conserving medical resources and costs, and facilitating early recovery.

Data availability

The data sets used during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AP:

Acute pancreatitis

SAP:

Severe acute pancreatitis

SOFA:

Sequential organ failure assessment

APACHE-II:

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

ICU:

Intensive care unit

RR:

Respiratory rate

HR:

Heart rate

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

POS2 :

Arterial oxygen partial pressure

PACo2 :

Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

AUC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

NRI:

Net reclassification improvement

IDI:

Integrated discrimination improvement

DCA:

Decision-curve analysis

ARF:

Acute respiratory failure

References

  1. Shah J, Rana SS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in acute pancreatitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020;39:123–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R, et al. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:819–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Dijk SM, Hallensleben NDL, van Santvoort HC, et al. Acute pancreatitis: recent advances through randomised trials. Gut. 2017;66:2024–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Srinivasan G, Venkatakrishnan L, Sambandam S, et al. Current concepts in the management of acute pancreatitis. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016;5:752–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jabaudon M, Belhadj-Tahar N, Rimmele T, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia and mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: a Multicenter Propensity Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e198–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leppaniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A, et al. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:27–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tian F, Li H, Wang L, et al. The diagnostic value of serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and lactate dehydrogenase in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;510:665–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karabuga B, Gemcioglu E, Konca Karabuga E, et al. Comparison of the predictive values of CRP, CRP/albumin, RDW, neutrophil/lymphocyte, and platelet/lymphocyte levels in determining the severity of acute pancreatitis in patients with acute pancreatitis according to the BISAP score. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2022;123:129–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wan J, Yang X, He W, et al. Serum D-dimer levels at admission for prediction of outcomes in acute pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, et al. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Z, Yang Y, Song H, et al. A prediction model with measured sentiment scores for the risk of in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10:676–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu X, Ai F, Huang M. Deceased serum bilirubin and albumin levels in the assessment of severity and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17:2685–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner TB, Vege SS, Chari ST, et al. The effect of age on hospital outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2008;8:265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Su YJ, Lai YC, Chou CY, et al. Emphysematous pancreatitis in the Elderly. Am J Med Sci. 2020;359:334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurusamy KS, Belgaumkar AP, Haswell A, et al. Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD011383–453.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li C, Ren Q, Wang Z, Wang G. Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis: a retrospective observational cohort study based on a large multicentre critical care database. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e041893–902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Beigmohammadi MT, Amoozadeh L, Rezaei Motlagh F et al. Mortality Predictive Value of APACHE II and SOFA Scores in COVID-19 Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Can Respir J 2022; 2022:5129314–5129321.

  19. Al-Hadeedi S, Fan ST, Leaper D. APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 1989; 738.

  20. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, et al. The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit Care. 2019;23:374–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang CJ, Chen J, Phillips AR, et al. Predictors of severe and critical acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zver T, Calame P, Koch S, et al. Early Prediction of Acute biliary pancreatitis using clinical and abdominal CT features. Radiology. 2022;302:118–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Di MY, Liu H, Yang ZY, et al. Prediction models of mortality in Acute Pancreatitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2016;16:482–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moran RA, Garcia-Rayado G, de la Iglesia-Garcia D, et al. Influence of age, body mass index and comorbidity on major outcomes in acute pancreatitis, a prospective nation-wide multicentre study. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2018;6:1508–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang J, Ge H, Zhu X, et al. Risk factors analysis and nomogram construction for postoperative pulmonary infection in elderly patients with hip fractures. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023;35:1891–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, et al. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care. 2009;47:626–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Han D, Xu F, Li C et al. A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: An Analysis Based on the Large MIMIC-III Clinical Database. Emerg Med Int 2021; 2021:9190908–9190919.

  28. Gajendran M, Prakash B, Perisetti A, et al. Predictors and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in hospitalised patients with acute pancreatitis. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021;12:478–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shafiq F, Khan MF, Asghar MA, et al. Outcome of patients with acute pancreatitis requiring intensive care admission: a retrospective study from a tertiary care center of Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34:1082–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jung B, Rimmele T, Le Goff C, et al. Severe metabolic or mixed acidemia on intensive care unit admission: incidence, prognosis and administration of buffer therapy. A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care. 2011;15:R238–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma V, Shanti Devi T, Sharma R, et al. Arterial pH, bicarbonate levels and base deficit at presentation as markers of predicting mortality in acute pancreatitis: a single-centre prospective study. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014;2:226–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sekimoto M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. JPN guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: epidemiology, etiology, natural history, and outcome predictors in acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:10–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Koutroumpakis E, Wu BU, Bakker OJ, et al. Admission hematocrit and rise in blood Urea Nitrogen at 24 h outperform other laboratory markers in Predicting Persistent Organ failure and pancreatic necrosis in Acute Pancreatitis: a Post Hoc Analysis of three large prospective databases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1707–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abraham M, Mitchell J, Simsovits D, Gasperino J. Hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis caused by the oral Contraceptive Agent Estrostep. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;30:303–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chhabra P, Rana SS, Sharma V, et al. Hypocalcemic tetany: a simple bedside marker of poor outcome in acute pancreatitis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29:214–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pokharel A, Sigdel PR, Phuyal S et al. Prediction of Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Using Total Serum Calcium and Albumin-Corrected Calcium: A Prospective Study in Tertiary Center Hospital in Nepal. Surg Res Pract. 2017; 2017:1869091–1869095.

  37. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: for the Third International Consensus definitions for Sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:762–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Teng TZJ, Tan JKT, Baey S, et al. Sequential organ failure assessment score is superior to other prognostic indices in acute pancreatitis. World J Crit Care Med. 2021;10:355–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the contribution of all patients, medical staff and investigators.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qingcheng Zhu, Mingfeng Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China

    Qingcheng Zhu, Mingfeng Lu, Bingyu Ling, Dingyu Tan & Huihui Wang

Authors
  1. Qingcheng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingfeng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bingyu Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dingyu Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huihui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhu QC and Lu MF contributed equally to this work; Zhu QC, Lu MF and Wang HH designed the research study; Zhu QC, Lu MF and Ling BY performed the research; Wang HH and Tan DY contributed analytic tools; Zhu QC, Wang HH and Lu MF analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approve the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huihui Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital (No. 2023035). Written informed consent was not required due to the retrospective nature of the study, and the need for consent to participate was also waived by the ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Q., Lu, M., Ling, B. et al. Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in elderly patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study from a tertiary center. BMC Gastroenterol 24, 219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03308-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03308-6

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us