Skip to main content
Download PDF

Sex difference in the associations among risk factors with gastroesophageal reflux disease in a large Taiwanese population study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 24, Article number: 165 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common global health issue. Previous studies have revealed a higher prevalence of GERD in females than in males, however few studies have investigated sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD. Therefore, the aim of this population-based study was to examine sex differences in the risk factors for GERD in a large cohort of over 120,000 Taiwanese participants.

Methods

We enrolled 121,583 participants (male: 43,698; female: 77,885; mean age 49.9 ± 11.0 years) from the Taiwan Biobank. The presence of GERD was ascertained using self-reported questionnaires. Sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD were examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

The overall prevalence of GERD was 13.7%, including 13.0% in the male participants and 14.1% in the female participants (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age, hypertension, smoking history, alcohol history, low fasting glucose, and low uric acid were significantly associated with GERD in the male participants. In the female participants, older age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking history, alcohol history, low systolic blood pressure, low fasting glucose, high hemoglobin, high total cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low uric acid were significantly associated with GERD. Significant interactions were found between sex and age (p < 0.001), diabetes (p < 0.001), smoking history (p < 0.001), fasting glucose (p = 0.002), triglycerides (p = 0.001), HDL-C (p = 0.001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.002) on GERD.

Conclusions

Our results showed a higher prevalence of GERD among females compared to males. Furthermore, sex differences were identified in the risk factors associated with GERD, and older age, diabetes, smoking history, and low HDL-C were more closely related to GERD in females than in males.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common global health issue, with a prevalence of approximately 10% to 20% in Western countries and about 2.5% to 17% in Asia [1,2,3,4,5]. In Taiwan, the prevalence of GERD has been estimated to be around 25% in the community [6]. Female sex and an age from 40–59 years are both known risk factors related to the development of GERD [6]. The pathogenesis of GERD is considered to be multifactorial, including transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and other lower esophageal sphincter pressure malfunctions, leading to reflux of acid, bile, pepsin and pancreatic enzymes into the esophagus causing mucosal damage [7]. Other etiologies of GERD such as hiatal hernia, impaired esophageal clearance, delayed gastric emptying and impaired mucosal defensive factors have also been reported [8,9,10]. Symptoms of GERD such as heartburn, regurgitation, belching, fullness sensation affect females more than males, while pathologic changes are more common in males than in females [11, 12]. Esophageal sensitivity can also differ between males and females, and this may explain the difference in symptoms [13]. On the other hand, the anti-inflammatory and mucosal protective effects of estrogen may play a role against acid reflux-induced mucosal damage [14, 15]. Complication from GERD such as Barrett's esophagus, erosive esophagitis, and chronic laryngitis may induce further structural stricture and increase the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma [11]. Hence, identifying risk factors which may be associated with GERD and the sex differences among these risk factors is important to decrease the burden on healthcare systems and develop new treatments to improve patient care.

Sex differences have been observed in many diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, cancers and liver diseases, and these differences have an important influence on the clinical presentation, progression, and response to management [16]. The mechanisms behind sex differences and sexual dimorphism are considered to be linked to sex hormones [17]. Hung et al. evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for GERD in 1238 people in the general population in Taiwan, and found that female sex was an independent risk factor related to the development of GERD, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.71 [6]. Nevertheless, few studies have investigated sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD [18,19,20]. In S Nasseri-Moghaddam’s study, frequent GERD was seen in 18.2%. Female sex (OR: 1.55) was a risk factor for GERD. However, the study didn’t separately compare risk factors of different sex with the association of GERD [20]. In J C Chiocca’s study, no statistically significant differences between sexes were observed. Thus, no further comparing risk factors of different genders with the association of GERD [18]. Shyam Menon et al. evaluated 154 406 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies, 24 240 (15.7%) patients had reflux esophagitis. The incidence of reflux esophagitis increased was more marked in women with increasing age, compared with men. However, this study only investigated the GERD relationship with age and sex. Other risk factors were not surveyed in this article [19]. Therefore, the aim of this population-based study was to examine sex differences in the risk factors for GERD in a large cohort of over 120,000 Taiwanese participants.

Methods

The Taiwan Biobank (TWB)

Due to the increasingly aged population in Taiwan, the TWB was established by the Ministry of Health and Welfare for the promotion of health services and prevention of chronic diseases. The TWB enrolls cancer-free members of the general community between the ages of 30 and 70 years, and records lifestyle factor, genomic and medical data [21,22,23]. The detailed information could be obtained from the official website: https://www.twbiobank.org.tw/. The Ethics and Governance Council of the TWB and Institutional Review Board on Biomedical Science Research, Academia Sinica, Taiwan granted ethical approval.

On enrollment, basic and medical data are collected from all participants, including age, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension, weight and height. Laboratory analysis of serum is also performed at baseline and after an 8-h fast (COBAS Integra 400, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, D-68298 Mannheim, Germany), and data on fasting glucose, hemoglobin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C/LDL-C), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (calculated as reported previously [24]), uric acid and creatinine (calculated as reported previously [24]) are recorded.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BPs) are also measured using an automated BP device by a nurse, and the average of three measurements was used in our analysis. We also recorded details of exercise habits, and a minimum of three 30-min sessions in 1 week was defined as “regular exercise” according to current guidelines in Taiwan [25]. This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUHIRB-E(I)-20,210,058).

Sample population and sample size

Participants between 30–70 years of age without a personal history of cancer, recruited between 2012 and 2018 in the TWB. All participants were enrolled. A total of 121,583 participants (male: 43,698; female: 77,885; mean age 49.9 ± 11.0 years) were included to analyze sex differences among the risk factors for GERD. Those who reported a history of GERD after completing a questionnaire were classified into the GERD group, and those who did were classified into the non-GERD group.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are shown in mean ± (SD), with categorical variables in number (%). Comparisons of continuous data were made using the independent t test, and comparisons of categorical data were made using the chi-square test. Associations between GERD and the studied risk factors in the male and female participants were examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. An interaction p and β in logistic analysis: Model disease (y) =  × 1 +  × 2 +  × 1 ×  × 2 + covariates. × 1 ×  × 2 was the interaction term, where y = GERD and its components; × 1 = sex; × 2 = each variable; covariates = age, DM and hypertension, smoking, alcohol and regular exercise habits, systolic and diastolic BPs, body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose, hemoglobin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, eGFR and uric acid. From the value of β, we can know which sex is more closely associated with GERD. If β > 0, this factor is more closely associated with male (OR > 1), and female (OR < 1); if β < 0, this factor is more closely associated with female (OR > 1) and male (OR < 1). In our database, we set male = 1, female = 0. We used SPSS for the analysis (v19, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY), and two-tailed p values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

Overall, 13.7% of the 121,583 enrolled participants had GERD, including 13.0% of the male participants and 14.1% of the female participants (p < 0.001).

Comparison of the participants with and without GERD

Table 1 shows comparisons of the clinical characteristics between the GERD and non-GERD groups. The GERD group was older, had a higher proportion of female participants, and higher prevalence of DM, hypertension, smoking, alcohol and regular exercise habits, higher fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL-C, and lower eGFR and uric acid than the non-GERD group.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study participants classified by the presence of GERD
Full size table

Determinants of GERD

Multivariable analysis with adjustments for the covariates listed in the Statistical analysis section showed significant associations between GERD with female sex (male vs. female; OR = 0.786; 95% confidence interval = 0.744–0.829), older age, hypertension, smoking history, alcohol history, low systolic BP, low fasting glucose, high hemoglobin, low uric acid (all p < 0.001), DM (p = 0.001), high BMI (p = 0.040), high total cholesterol (p = 0.001), low HDL-C (p = 0.003), and low LDL-C (p = 0.009) (Table 2).

Table 2 Determinants for GERD using multivariable logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Comparison of the male and female participants

Compared to the male participants, the female participants had lower prevalence of DM and hypertension, higher prevalence of GERD, and lower prevalence of smoking, alcohol and regular exercise habits, higher total cholesterol, HDL-C and eGFR, and lower systolic and diastolic BPs, BMI, fasting glucose, hemoglobin, triglycerides, LDL-C, and uric acid (Table 3).

Table 3 Clinical characteristics of the study participants classified by sex
Full size table

Comparisons of the male and female participants with and without GERD

The male participants with GERD were older, had higher prevalence of hypertension, smoking, alcohol and regular exercise habits, lower prevalence of hyperuricemia, and lower diastolic BP, BMI, uric acid and eGFR than the male participants without GERD (Table 4). The female participants with GERD were older, had higher prevalence of DM, hypertension, alcohol, smoking and regular exercise habits, higher systolic BP, BMI, fasting glucose, hemoglobin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C and uric acid, and lower HDL-C and eGFR than the female participants without GERD (Table 4).

Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the study participants classified by the presence of different sex and GERD
Full size table

Associations and interactions among the risk factors for GERD in the male and female participants

Table 5 shows the association and interaction of factors with GERD in different sex using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regarding the associations and interactions among the risk factors for GERD in the male and female participants, multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustments for the covariates listed in the Statistical analysis section showed significant associations between GERD with older age, hypertension, smoking history, alcohol history, low uric acid (all p < 0.001) and low fasting glucose (p = 0.004) in the male participants (Table 5). In the female participants, older age, DM, hypertension, smoking history, low systolic BP (all p < 0.001), low uric acid (p = 0.001), alcohol history (p = 0.033), low fasting glucose (p = 0.002), high hemoglobin (p = 0.001), high total cholesterol (p = 0.015), low HDL-C (p = 0.008), and low LDL-C (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with GERD.

Table 5 Association and interaction of factors with GERD in different sex using multivariable logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Significant interactions were found between sex and the following factors on GERD: age (p < 0.001), DM (p < 0.001), smoking history (p < 0.001), fasting glucose (p = 0.002), triglycerides (p = 0.001), HDL-C (p = 0.001), and eGFR (p = 0.002).

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD in a large Taiwanese population. We found that the female participants had a higher prevalence of GERD than the male participants, and that the risk factors associated with GERD in the female participants were older age, DM, hypertension, smoking and alcohol history, low systolic BP, high hemoglobin, low fasting glucose, high total cholesterol, low HDL-C, low LDL-C and low uric acid. On the other hand, the risk factors associated with GERD in the male participants were older age, hypertension, smoking and alcohol history, low systolic BP, low fasting glucose and low uric acid. Furthermore, there were sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD, including age, DM, smoking history, fasting glucose, triglyceride, HDL-C and eGFR. Among them, older age, DM, smoking history, and low HDL-C were more closely related to GERD in the females than in the males.

Our finding of a higher prevalence of GERD in the female participants than in the male participants is consistent with the study by Nasseri-Moghaddam et al., who also reported that female participants had a higher prevalence of GERD (OR = 1.55 in frequent GERD, OR = 1.24 in infrequent GERD) in a questionnaire survey conducted in Iran [20]. According to their study, female sex was independently associated with frequent GERD. A possible explanation for this finding is that risk factors associated with GERD such as a higher BMI, less education, smoking, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were also more prevalent in females, and these factors may have contributed to the higher prevalence of GERD in this population [20]. Another population-based study conducted in urban Brazil by Moraes-Filho et al. also demonstrated that GERD symptoms including heartburn and regurgitation were more frequently found in females than in males [26]. In addition, they found that the occurrence of GERD increased with emotional distress which is significant linked with GERD and women. In Taiwan, women were significantly associated with depression compared to men [27]. Our study did not survey the relationship between emotional condition with GERD and sex. However, the significant higher prevalence of depression in women than in men might contribute to the higher prevalence of GERD in females. The anti-inflammatory effect of estrogen had been shown in animal models, and this effect has been shown to enhance esophageal mucosal resistance to gastric acid injury and nitric oxide-induced tissue damage [28, 29]. In a study of male rats, exogenous nitric oxide treatment was shown to lead to the development of severe esophageal ulcers and inflammation, characterized by the infiltration of lymphocytes. In contrast, only mild tissue damage was observed in female rats under similar conditions [28]. These mechanisms may at least partially explain the sex differences in GERD.

We also found that older age was more closely related to GERD in females than in males. Menon et al. reported that the incidence of GERD increased with age, but that this phenomenon was more obvious in females than in males [19]. Braniste et al. postulated that the decrease in serum estrogen levels resulting from aging could compromise epithelial integrity and induce bacterial translocation, particularly post menopause in females [30, 31]. This may then result in an increased incidence of GERD and also more severe reflux symptoms [15, 32]. Another factor associated with reflux symptoms, especially in nonerosive reflux disease, is visceral hypersensitivity. This may be caused by the upregulation of certain molecules in the esophageal mucosal, such as transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 [33, 34]. Females have been shown to have higher sensitivity to mechanical stimuli of pain and larger referred pain areas in the esophagus than males [35]. Therefore, we hypothesize that the age-associated decrease in serum estrogen levels may explain why older age was more closely related to GERD in females.

Another interesting finding of this study is that DM was more closely related to GERD in females than in males. The association between DM and upper gastroenterology symptoms such as GERD has been reported in many studies [36, 37]. Lower esophageal contraction strength, frequency of peristaltic waves, and pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter along with atypical gastroesophageal reflux may contribute to this phenomenon [38, 39]. Decreased density and anomalous morphology of nerve fibers in the gastric mucosa of individuals with DM also play a role in peristalsis dysfunction [40, 41]. A meta-analysis of trends in the prevalence and incidence of DM in Taiwan from 2000–2014 disclosed that females with DM had a higher percentage of > 10 years lived with disability than males [42, 43]. We hypothesize that the longer patients have DM, the worse esophageal nerve damage will be. This pathophysiology may then worsen GERD in female patients with DM. In addition, female patients with DM are also associated with a higher incidence of other comorbidities. For example, female DM patients are more likely to develop metabolic syndrome (MetS) compared to male DM patients [44,45,46]. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that after menopause, the decline in estrogen levels leads to changes in body composition and metabolism, including an increase in body fat and a decrease in lean muscle mass [47]. This evolutionary energy conservation regulation may increase the risk of MetS in modern female DM patients, and consequently increase the prevalence of GERD.

Another key finding of this study is that smoking was more closely related to GERD in females than in males. Smoking can induce GERD by nicotine blocking cholinergic receptors, which in turn reduces pressure in the lower esophagus [48, 49]. In addition, smoking causes a reduction in the rate of salivary secretion and decrease in salivary bicarbonate concentration, which then reduces acid clearance time [50]. Nilsson et al. conducted a large population-based study (43,363 cases) in Norway, and found that tobacco smoking was highly associated with GERD, but with no sex difference [51]. In our study, however, we found that the female smokers had a greater OR than the male smokers for GERD. Smoking has also been associated with sex differences in other health issues. For instance, women who smoke have been associated with a higher risk of lung cancer than men with similar smoking exposure [52]. Sex differences in the expressions of some somatic gene mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene or epidermal growth factor receptor have been shown to induce higher levels of DNA adducts in women than in men [53]. Another example of a sex difference in smoking-related comorbidity is coronary artery disease, and Huxley et al. reported that compared with nonsmokers, female smokers had a 25% greater relative risk of coronary artery disease than male smokers [54]. The protective effect of estrogen on plaque rupture or erosions is considered to be more prominent in women than in men [55]. In addition, estrogen may interfere with the accumulation of foam cells in coronary plaques [55]. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms by which smoking causes a higher prevalence of GERD in women than in men.

Our results also showed that a low HDL-C level was more closely related to GERD in females than in males. In a study by Hsieh et al. of 4895 patients who received upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Taiwan, a low HDL-C level was not significantly associated with GERD [56]. In addition, a Korean population study analyzed a total of 6082 subjects with MetS, and also found no significant association between HDL-C and GERD [57]. A decreased level of serum HDL-C has been associated with long-term Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, which may also be associated with cardiovascular disease [58]. It has been shown that chronic H. pylori infection is not associated with GERD or even inversely correlated with the severity of reflux esophagitis [59, 60]. However, symptoms caused by chronic H. pylori infection such as epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and delayed gastric emptying may mimic the symptoms of GERD. Chen et al. recently reported an updated analysis on the prevalence of H. pylori infection in Taiwan, and reported that females had a significantly higher OR of H. pylori infection [61]. Because our data were acquired by self-reported questionnaire, it is possible that some of the GERD patients had concomitant H. pylori infection. HDL-C is currently considered to be not only associated with cholesterol transportation, but also with anti-inflammation, cellular antioxidant activity and immunomodulation [62, 63]. Notably, serum estrogen has been demonstrated to be inversely proportional to serum HDL-C level, and especially in menopausal women [64]. We postulate that the decrease in estrogen level in menopause may induce chronic inflammation, which consequently damages the gastric mucosa, lower esophageal sphincter and enteric nervous system, and exacerbates GERD.

The strength of this research is the inclusion of large cohort of community-dwelling participants and the comprehensive analysis of sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD. Nevertheless, several limitations should also be noted. First, we did not evaluate the duration of GERD in this cross-sectional study, and hence we could not evaluate causal relationships. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to investigate the risk of incident GERD. Second, we did not validate the self-reported presence of GERD, and we could not analyze the type and severity of GERD. In addition, no further symptoms and/or signs were evaluated. Therefore, we could analyze the associated factors with symptoms/signs of GERD. Further research is needed to explore the sex difference in the associations among risk factors with the type and severity of GERD. Nevertheless, a previous study demonstrated fair agreement between claims data and self-reported diseases in Taiwan. Finally, the Chinese ethnicity of our participants may limit the findings to other groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results showed a higher prevalence of GERD in females than in males in this large Taiwanese cohort. Furthermore, there were sex differences in the risk factors associated with GERD, and older age, DM, smoking history, and low HDL-C were more closely related to GERD in females than in males.

Availability of data and materials

The data underlying this study are from the Taiwan Biobank Database. Due to restrictions placed on the data by the Personal Information Protection Act of Taiwan, the minimal data set cannot be made publicly available. Data may be available upon request to interested researchers. Please send data requests to: Szu-Chia Chen, PhD, MD. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

GERD:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

H. pylori:

Helicobacter pylori

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

OR:

Odds ratio

TWB:

Taiwan Biobank

References

  1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63(6):871–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu WH, Wong WM, Lam CL, Lam KF, Hui WM, Lai KC, Xia HX, Lam SK, Wong BC. Anxiety but not depression determines health care-seeking behaviour in Chinese patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16(12):2081–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li YM, Du J, Zhang H, Yu CH. Epidemiological investigation in outpatients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux from the Department of Medicine in Zhejiang Province, east China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(2):283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang JH, Luo JY, Dong L, Gong J, Tong M. Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a general population-based study in Xi’an of Northwest China. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(11):1647–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong WM, Lai KC, Lam KF, Hui WM, Hu WH, Lam CL, Xia HH, Huang JQ, Chan CK, Lam SK, et al. Prevalence, clinical spectrum and health care utilization of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in a Chinese population: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(6):595–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung LJ, Hsu PI, Yang CY, Wang EM, Lai KH. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a general population in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(7):1164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, Sekiguchi T, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC, Petrie DJ. Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest. 1980;65(2):256–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Storr M, Meining A, Allescher HD. Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis. 2000;18(2):93–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckles DC, Sarosiek I, McMillin C, McCallum RW. Delayed gastric emptying in gastroesophageal reflux disease: reassessment with new methods and symptomatic correlations. Am J Med Sci. 2004;327(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron AJ. Barrett’s esophagus: prevalence and size of hiatal hernia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(8):2054–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ford AC, Forman D, Reynolds PD, Cooper BT, Moayyedi P. Ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status as risk factors for esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(5):454–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mishima I, Adachi K, Arima N, Amano K, Takashima T, Moritani M, Furuta K, Kinoshita Y. Prevalence of endoscopically negative and positive gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Japanese. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(9):1005–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen P, Scott M, Castell DO. Evidence of gender differences in esophageal pain threshold. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90(6):901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang L, Toner BB, Fukudo S, Guthrie E, Locke GR, Norton NJ, Sperber AD. Gender, age, society, culture, and the patient’s perspective in the functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1435–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grishina I, Fenton A, Sankaran-Walters S. Gender differences, aging and hormonal status in mucosal injury and repair. Aging Dis. 2014;5(2):160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero JJ, DeMeo DL, De Vries GJ, Epperson CN, Govindan R, Klein SL, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mittendorfer B. Insulin resistance: sex matters. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8(4):367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiocca JC, Olmos JA, Salis GB, Soifer LO, Higa R, Marcolongo M. Argentinean gastro-oesophageal reflux study g: prevalence, clinical spectrum and atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in Argentina: a nationwide population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(4):331–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Menon S, Jayasena H, Nightingale P, Trudgill NJ. Influence of age and sex on endoscopic findings of gastrooesophageal reflux disease: an endoscopy database study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(5):389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Mofid A, Ghotbi MH, Razjouyan H, Nouraie M, Ramard AR, Zaer-Rezaie H, Habibi R, Rafat-Zand K, Malekzadeh R. Epidemiological study of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: reflux in spouse as a risk factor. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28(1):144–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen CH, Yang JH, Chiang CWK, Hsiung CN, Wu PE, Chang LC, Chu HW, Chang J, Song IW, Yang SL, et al. Population structure of Han Chinese in the modern Taiwanese population based on 10,000 participants in the Taiwan Biobank project. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(24):5321–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan CT, Hung TH, Yeh CK. Taiwan regulation of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(4):816–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin JC, Fan CT, Liao CC, Chen YS. Taiwan Biobank: making cross-database convergence possible in the big data era. Gigascience. 2018;7(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ministry of Education: Physical Fitness 333 Plan. http://www.fitness.org.tw/.

  26. Moraes-Filho JP, Chinzon D, Eisig JN, Hashimoto CL, Zaterka S. Prevalence of heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease in the urban Brazilian population. Arq Gastroenterol. 2005;42(2):122–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tseng H, Lee J-I, Geng J-H, Chen S-C. Sex difference in the associations among risk factors with depression in a large Taiwanese population study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1070827.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Masaka T, Iijima K, Endo H, Asanuma K, Ara N, Ishiyama F, Asano N, Koike T, Imatani A, Shimosegawa T. Gender differences in oesophageal mucosal injury in a reflux oesophagitis model of rats. Gut. 2013;62(1):6–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Velders M, Schleipen B, Fritzemeier KH, Zierau O, Diel P. Selective estrogen receptor-beta activation stimulates skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. FASEB J. 2012;26(5):1909–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Braniste V, Leveque M, Buisson-Brenac C, Bueno L, Fioramonti J, Houdeau E. Oestradiol decreases colonic permeability through oestrogen receptor beta-mediated up-regulation of occludin and junctional adhesion molecule-A in epithelial cells. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 13):3317–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Braniste V, Jouault A, Gaultier E, Polizzi A, Buisson-Brenac C, Leveque M, Martin PG, Theodorou V, Fioramonti J, Houdeau E. Impact of oral bisphenol A at reference doses on intestinal barrier function and sex differences after perinatal exposure in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(1):448–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boeckxstaens G, El-Serag HB, Smout AJ, Kahrilas PJ. Symptomatic reflux disease: the present, the past and the future. Gut. 2014;63(7):1185–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen CL. Visceral hypersensitivity in non-erosive reflux disease: neurogenic overwhelming in esophagus? Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(8):2131–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhat YM, Bielefeldt K. Capsaicin receptor (TRPV1) and non-erosive reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18(3):263–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pedersen J, Reddy H, Funch-Jensen P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Gregersen H, Drewes AM. Differences between male and female responses to painful thermal and mechanical stimulation of the human esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49(7–8):1065–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boehme MW, Autschbach F, Ell C, Raeth U. Prevalence of silent gastric ulcer, erosions or severe acute gastritis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus–a cross-sectional study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54(74):643–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Horikawa A, Ishii-Nozawa R, Ohguro M, Takagi S, Ohtuji M, Yamada M, Kuzuya N, Ujihara N, Ujihara M, Takeuchi K. Prevalence of GORD (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease) in Type 2 diabetes and a comparison of clinical profiles between diabetic patients with and without GORD. Diabet Med. 2009;26(3):228–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lluch I, Ascaso JF, Mora F, Minguez M, Pena A, Hernandez A, Benages A. Gastroesophageal reflux in diabetes mellitus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(4):919–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kinekawa F, Kubo F, Matsuda K, Fujita Y, Tomita T, Uchida Y, Nishioka M. Relationship between esophageal dysfunction and neuropathy in diabetic patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(7):2026–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Selim MM, Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Redmon JB, Khoruts A, Hodges JS, Koch K, Walk D, Kennedy WR. Gastric mucosal nerve density: a biomarker for diabetic autonomic neuropathy? Neurology. 2010;75(11):973–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jin HY, Kang YM, Kim CY, Kim SH, Liu WJ, Piao MH, Park JH, Baek HS, Park TS. Morphological comparison of small nerve fibres in gastric mucosa in non-diabetic and Type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabet Med. 2009;26(9):943–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jiang YD, Chang CH, Tai TY, Chen JF, Chuang LM. Incidence and prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus in Taiwan: analysis of the 2000–2009 Nationwide Health Insurance database. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012;111(11):599–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sheen YJ, Hsu CC, Jiang YD, Huang CN, Liu JS, Sheu WH. Trends in prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus from 2005 to 2014 in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019;118(Suppl 2):S66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goedecke JH, Mtintsilana A, Dlamini SN, Kengne AP. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in African women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;123:87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sarafidis PA, Nilsson PM. The metabolic syndrome: a glance at its history. J Hypertens. 2006;24(4):621–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ilanne-Parikka P, Eriksson JG, Lindstrom J, Hamalainen H, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Mannelin M, Rastas M, Salminen V. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its components: findings from a finnish general population sample and the diabetes prevention study cohort. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(9):2135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ribas V, Drew BG, Zhou Z, Phun J, Kalajian NY, Soleymani T, Daraei P, Widjaja K, Wanagat J, de AguiarVallim TQ. Skeletal muscle action of estrogen receptor α is critical for the maintenance of mitochondrial function and metabolic homeostasis in females. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(334):334ra354-334ra354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Misiewicz JJ, Waller SL, Anthony PP, Gummer JW. Achalasia of the cardia: pharmacology and histopathology of isolated cardiac sphincteric muscle from patients with and without achalasia. Q J Med. 1969;38(149):17–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kahrilas PJ, Gupta RR. Mechanisms of acid reflux associated with cigarette smoking. Gut. 1990;31(1):4–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kahrilas PJ, Gupta RR. The effect of cigarette smoking on salivation and esophageal acid clearance. J Lab Clin Med. 1989;114(4):431–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nilsson M, Johnsen R, Ye W, Hveem K, Lagergren J. Lifestyle related risk factors in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut. 2004;53(12):1730–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Powell HA, Iyen-Omofoman B, Hubbard RB, Baldwin DR, Tata LJ. The association between smoking quantity and lung cancer in men and women. Chest. 2013;143(1):123–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mollerup S, Ryberg D, Hewer A, Phillips DH, Haugen A. Sex differences in lung CYP1A1 expression and DNA adduct levels among lung cancer patients. Can Res. 1999;59(14):3317–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Huxley RR, Woodward M. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT. Liang Y-h, Smialek J, Virmani R: Effect of risk factors on the mechanism of acute thrombosis and sudden coronary death in women. Circulation. 1998;97(21):2110–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hsieh Y-H, Wu M-F, Yang P-Y, Liao W-C, Hsieh Y-H, Chang Y-J, Lin I-C. What is the impact of metabolic syndrome and its components on reflux esophagitis? A cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Song HJ, Shim K-N, Yoon SJ, Kim S-E, Oh HJ, Ryu KH, Ha CY, Yeom HJ, Song JH, Jung S-A. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of reflux esophagitis in koreans and its possible relation to metabolic syndrome. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(2):197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Takashima T, Adachi K, Kawamura A, Yuki M, Fujishiro H, Rumi MA, Ishihara S, Watanabe M, Kinoshita Y. Cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2002;7(2):86–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shirota T, Kusano M, Kawamura O, Horikoshi T, Mori M, Sekiguchi T. Helicobacter pylori infection correlates with severity of reflux esophagitis: with manometry findings. J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(5):553–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chung SJ, Lim SH, Choi J, Kim D, Kim YS, Park MJ, Yim JY, Kim JS, Cho SH, Jung HC, et al. Helicobacter pylori serology inversely correlated with the risk and severity of reflux esophagitis in helicobacter pylori endemic area: a matched case-control study of 5,616 health check-up Koreans. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17(3):267–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Chen MJ, Fang YJ, Wu MS, Chen CC, Chen YN, Yu CC, Kuo CC, Chiu MC, Hu WH, Tsai MH, et al. Application of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test to survey the updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(2):233–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Irino Y, Toh R, Ishida T. A novel indicator for HDL functionality. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019;26(11):945–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Hiltbold EM, Poloso NJ, Roche PA. MHC class II-peptide complexes and APC lipid rafts accumulate at the immunological synapse. J Immunol. 2003;170(3):1329–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. El Khoudary SR, Nasr A, Billheimer J, Brooks MM, McConnell D, Crawford S, Orchard TJ, Rader DJ, Matthews KA. Associations of endogenous hormones with HDL novel metrics across the menopause transition: the SWAN HDL study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(1):e303–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported partially by the Research Center for Precision Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan and by Kaohsiung Medical University Research Center Grant (KMU-TC111A01 and KMUTC111IFSP01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan

    Chien-Chieh Lin

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan

    Chien-Chieh Lin, Huang-Ming Hu & Chao-Hung Kuo

  3. Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 812, Taiwan

    Jiun-Hung Geng

  4. Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan

    Jiun-Hung Geng

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, 482, Shan-Ming Rd., Siaogang Dist., Kaohsiung, 812, Taiwan R.O.C.

    Pei-Yu Wu, Jiun-Chi Huang, Szu-Chia Chen & Chao-Hung Kuo

  6. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Pei-Yu Wu, Jiun-Chi Huang & Szu-Chia Chen

  7. Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan

    Pei-Yu Wu, Jiun-Chi Huang, Huang-Ming Hu, Szu-Chia Chen & Chao-Hung Kuo

Authors
  1. Chien-Chieh Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiun-Hung Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pei-Yu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiun-Chi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huang-Ming Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Szu-Chia Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chao-Hung Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: C.-C.L., H.-H.G., P.-Y.W., J.-C.H., H.-M.H., S.-C.C. and C.-H.K. Methodology: H.-H.G. and S.-C.C. Validation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, and supervision: S.-C.C. and C.-H.K. Software and investigation: H.-H.G. and S.-C.C. Resources, project admin-istration, and funding acquisition: S.-C.C. Data curation: C.-C.L., H.-H.G., P.-Y.W., J.-C.H., H.-M.H., S.-C.C. and C.-H.K. Writing—original draft preparation: C.-C.L. Visualization: S.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Szu-Chia Chen or Chao-Hung Kuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and it was granted approval by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUHIRB-E(I)-20210058), and the TWB was granted approval by the IRB on Biomedical Science Research, Academia Sinica, Taiwan and the Ethics and Governance Council of the TWB. All participants in the TWB provide written informed consent before enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CC., Geng, JH., Wu, PY. et al. Sex difference in the associations among risk factors with gastroesophageal reflux disease in a large Taiwanese population study. BMC Gastroenterol 24, 165 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03254-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03254-3

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us