Skip to main content
Download PDF

The evaluation of the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio in peptic ulcer and its association with refractory helicobacter pylori infection

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 287 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is one of the leading causes of peptic ulcers, and its treatment is a worldwide challenge. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors influence the development and healing of peptic ulcers. This study aimed to evaluate the ratios of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) in patients with peptic ulcers that are sensitive or resistant to H. pylori treatment and compare them with healthy individuals.

Methods

In this study, 95 patients were included and divided into two groups sensitive (41 patients) and resistant to treatment (54 patients). The results were compared with a control group of 20 participants with normal endoscopy and H. pylori-negative. After obtaining written informed consent, five ml of venous blood was taken to determine their serum MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

In patients with H. pylori-induced peptic ulcers, the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio was significantly higher than the healthy controls (P < 0.05). MMP-2 level was associated with patients’ response to treatment (P < 0.05). The MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio was higher in patients with simultaneous gastric and duodenal ulcers (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

It seems that peptic ulcer disease caused by infection with H. pylori increases the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio in patients with peptic ulcers. However, it might not be a good predictor of refractory H. pylori-induced peptic ulcer disease.

Peer Review reports

Background

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a prevalent condition in the digestive system which usually occurs in the stomach or duodenum due to the damage caused by peptic acid [1]. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the leading cause of PUD. However, only a limited number of H.pylori-positive patients or NSAID consumers become afflicted with PUD [2, 3]. Diagnostic tests for detecting active H. pylori infection include endoscopy, urea breath test, and stool antigen test. A stool antigen test is usually used to primarily detect H.pylori infection and confirm its eradication [4, 5]. H.pylori infection is common in Iran, and its prevalence is between 36 and 90% in different geographic areas [6].

Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance and failure of treatment in almost 20% of the patient, the first attempt to eradicate H. pylori has become a challenge. It is essential to perform a confirmation test to verify that H. pylori has been completely eradicated after the eradication therapy. The stool antigen test is a widely used and effective tool for this purpose [7].

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-dependent proteolytic enzymes that degrade the basement membrane (BM) and extracellular matrix (ECM) components [8]. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) are endogenous and naturally occurring inhibitors of MMPs, inhibiting their actions by creating noncovalent complexes. Four members of TIMPs, TIMP-1, -2, -3, and -4, have been characterized. The balance between MMPs and TIMPs is responsible for regulating the turnover of the extracellular matrix and maintaining tissue homeostasis. Any changes in this balance can lead to the development of various diseases. TIMP-1 is a potent inhibitor of several MMPs and also plays a crucial role in controlling different biological processes, including cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis, by binding to undisclosed receptors [9].

If an individual contracts H. pylori, it will ultimately result in the production of MMPs. This leads to a state of chronic inflammation, causing severe harm to the mucosal lining. Furthermore, it creates an environment that makes it easier for bacteria, immune cells, and stroma to connect with the epithelium, thereby exacerbating the situation [10].

Several studies have examined MMP levels in tissue and serum samples of patients with H. pylori infection. In the tissue sample, MMP types 2, 7, 8, and 9, as well as MT1-MMP, were found to be elevated, but research on TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 has yielded conflicting results [11,12,13]. When using the ELISA method to examine the serum of adults with PUD caused by H. pylori and comparing it to healthy individuals, the results indicated that the levels of MMP-8 and -9 increased while the level of MMP-7 did not change. Additionally, the levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 decreased [14].

There have been conflicting reports about the levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 in patients with H. pylori infection. While some studies have shown a decrease in these levels, others have found the opposite [14, 15]. This has made establishing a clear association between H. pylori infection and MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels difficult. Additionally, there has been no research on the link between MMPs/TIMPs and resistant H. pylori infection. This study aims to investigate the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio in patients with PUD and its relationship with refractory H. pylori infection. By measuring this ratio before starting treatment, it may be possible to predict the likelihood of resistance and prescribe a more effective treatment plan. This approach will be more cost-effective and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance while improving patient tolerance.

Methods

Study design

This analytical cross-sectional study investigated patients referring to the Gastroenterology Clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ardabil, Iran. A checklist of demographic information, including age, sex, etc., and endoscopy results were filled out for each patient.

Then they underwent standard quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection with 14 days of omeprazole (20 mg twice a day), metronidazole (500 mg twice a day), clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day), and bismuth subsalicylate (two tablets, four times a day). A stool antigen test was performed 8–12 weeks after therapy to confirm H. pylori eradication.

To evaluate the serum MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels, 5 ml of blood sample was taken before treatment began. After keeping the blood samples for 20 min at room temperature, samples were centrifuged at 2500–3000 rpm for 10–15 min to separate the serum. The samples were then transferred to a refrigerator and stored at -80 °C until use. Finally, the samples were analyzed for serum MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels using ELISA kits (ZellBio®, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In Fig. 1, the flowchart of the study design is illustrated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The study design flowchart

Full size image

Samples preparation

The patients who entered the study were diagnosed with PUD and H. pylori infection based on their endoscopy and biopsy results. We excluded participants with chronic PUD, pneumonia, bronchiectasis, and a history of using NSAIDs or having malignancies from the study as these conditions have the potential to affect the MMP-2 or TIMP-1 levels and could introduce bias to the results [16,17,18,19]. Ninety-five patients participated in the study and were divided into two groups. The resistant group consisted of 54 patients who still tested positive, while the sensitive group had 41 patients who tested negative. Additionally, a control group was included, which consisted of 20 healthy individuals with normal endoscopy and negative H. pylori test.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Medical Sciences with the approval code of IR.ARUMS.REC.1399.081. Before entering the study, written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Statistical analyses

The obtained data were coded and fed into SPSS Software, Version 26. The Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between the treatment response and variables. Also, to evaluate the relationship between variables and serum levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and their ratios, the one-way ANOVA and independent t-test were used. The significance level was set at 0.05 for all tests.

Results

Demographic features and endoscopy findings of the enrolled population

The study examined a total of 115 participants, including 95 patients with H. pylori-positive PUD and 20 healthy individuals. Of these participants, 70 were male, and 45 were female, with an average age of 52.23 ± 9.91 years. The use of alcohol among the three groups showed significant differences (P < 0.05), according to the Chi-Square test, but the endoscopic findings did not show any significant results (P = 0.65) (Table 1).

Table 1 The distribution of demographic features and endoscopy findings in the study groups
Full size table

Comparison of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 ratios with demographic features and endoscopy findings

The levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and their ratio were found to be related to alcohol consumption and smoking, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Patients with a smoking history and those without a history of alcohol consumption had higher levels of MMP-2. Smoking also caused a significant increase in the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio (P = 0.01). Endoscopic findings showed a significant association with MMP-2, TIMP-1, and their ratio (P < 0.05), with the highest levels of MMP-2 and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio and the lowest levels of TIMP-1, observed in patients with PUD simultaneously present in the gastric and duodenal regions (Table 2).

Table 2 Analysis of mean MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels and their relationship with demographic features and endoscopy findings
Full size table

Comparison of MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio in the study groups

The mean MMP-2 level was 741.93 ± 218.16 ng/ml in the H. pylori-induced PUD group and 204.50 ± 33.80 ng/ml in the control group. The mean TIMP-1 level for these two groups was 205.67 ± 77.18 ng/ml and 107.31 ± 9.27 ng/ml, respectively. Furthermore, the mean MMP-2/TMP-1 ratio in these two groups was 4.36 ± 2.48 ng/ml and 1.92 ± 0.39 ng/ml, respectively. The results of the analyses indicated that the patient and control groups were significantly different in terms of mean levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The comparison of mean serum levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratios between patients with H. pylori induced peptic ulcer and control groups

Full size image

The mean MMP-2 level in the sensitive group was 677.34 ± 177.28 ng/ml, and in the resistant group was 790.96 ± 234.56 ng/ml. The mean TIMP-1 levels for these two groups were 220.49 ± 88.99 ng/ml and 194.42 ± 65.49 ng/ml, respectively. Also, the mean MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratios in the two groups were 4.07 ± 2.01 ng/ml and 4.57 ± 2.79 ng/ml, respectively. The results of the analyses revealed that the two groups were significantly different in terms of mean MMP-2 levels (P < 0.05). However, as regards the mean TIMP-1 level and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio, no significant differences were observed between the sensitive and the resistant groups (P > 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The comparison of mean serum levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and their ratios between H. pylori treatment sensitive and resistant patients

Full size image

Discussion

H. pylori infection is among the leading causes of PUD. Research has revealed that eradicating H. pylori in the affected patients not only cures PUD but also improves the related clinical symptoms. PUD heals following the formation of granulation tissue and repair of the injured tissue in the base of the ulcer. The balance between MMPs and TIMPs affects peptic ulcer formation and healing processes. A higher proportion of MMPs increases proteolysis in ECM and causes ulcers, while a higher proportion of TIMPs brings about better protection for ECM, decreases proteolysis, and heals the ulcer [20, 21].

The few studies on the effects of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 on patients with H. pylori-induced PUD show controversial results. In 2004, Calabrò et al. conducted a study investigating the variations of MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-13, and their inhibitor (TIMP-1) in a mouse model with an acetic acid-induced ulcer. They observed that the variations in the levels of MMPs and TIMP-1 were similar during the healing process of the ulcer; their levels increased rapidly after the injury occurrence, reached the highest after one week, and constantly reduced through the last phase of tissue repair. However, quantitative analyses indicated a relative increase in the expression of TIMP-1 in comparison with MMPs during the first week, while after four weeks, the expression of MMPs and TIMP-1 decreased relatively [22]. Our study assessed MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels and their ratio only once, and the results revealed a higher serum level of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and their ratio, despite all the controversies, which might be due to the higher rate of ECM degradation and the healing process in the presence of multiple ulcers. Furthermore, the presentation of the highest levels of MMP-2 and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio, along with the lowest levels of TIMP-1 in the coincidence of gastric and duodenal ulcer, raise the presumption of more severe infection in these patients.

In a study by Rautelin et al., the increase of MMPs in response to H. pylori-induced gastritis was investigated. MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, NE, MPO, and TIMP-1 levels were examined. The results indicated that in H. pylori-positive patients with gastritis, the serum levels of myeloperoxidase, neutrophil elastase, MMP-8, and MMP-9 increased significantly. Also, MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels were decreased significantly compared to controls with negative H. pylori infection. As regards the serum level of MMP-7, the two groups revealed no significant difference [14]. Their study's sample size was smaller than ours (44 vs. 95 patients, respectively), suggesting the lower precision of the results obtained in their study. Contrary to the findings reported in the mentioned study, our study indicated that MMP-2 and TIMP-1 levels and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio significantly increased in patients with H. pylori-induced PUD. Studies show higher levels of TIMP-1 in H.pylori infection-induced PUD than other reasons, such as NSAIDs [20]. These findings prevail the efficacy of these factors’ measurements in patients with PUD for differentiating the cause of PUDs.

Several studies have been conducted on the effect of alcohol on H. pylori infection; some present a negative impact, while others show no significance [23, 24]. But theories such as its antibacterial and bactericidal effects against new and old infections have been proposed for its negative effects. In the types of alcohol that cause stomach acid secretion, it is presumed that as a basal pH is needed for the infection to live in the stomach, the reduction in the stomach pH levels causes this infection to be annihilated [23, 25]. Additionally, alcohol has been found to decrease the activity of MMP-2 in the human body [26]. Our study showed that most of our H. pylori-induced PUD patients and most refractory cases did not use alcohol. As the number of alcohol consumers is limited, the significant decrease in MMP-2 levels and less alcohol use in the resistant population does not seem reliable. However, further study on this subject with more population in both groups is suggested.

Yu et al. conducted a review article studying the impact of smoking on H. pylori eradication. They found that smoking affects H. pylori eradication through four mechanisms. Firstly, smokers have increased secretion of pentapeptides. Secondly, nicotine reduces blood flow, resulting in decreased antibiotic delivery. Thirdly, there are changes in proton pump inhibitors metabolism. Fourthly, smoking is linked to lower treatment adherence. Furthermore, smokers with H. pylori-induced PUD have a higher risk of treatment failure [27]. Furthermore, previous studies present a delayed healing of peptic ulcers in smokers through the reduction of gastric blood flow and angiogenesis at the ulcer margin [28]. Our research found no significant correlation between smoking and H. pylori resistance. However, we did discover that MMP-2 levels were considerably higher in smokers, which aligns with the findings of the Ning et al. study [29]. Smoking is well-known as a common but not independent risk factor for PUD [30]. Since MMP-2 levels are elevated in these patients, it is reasonable to assume that smoking may contribute to PUD development in H. pylori patients by increasing MMP-2 levels. We will leave the investigation of this subject to future studies.

In our study, the levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and their ratio have been investigated in refractory H. pylori-induced PUD for the first time. It is demonstrated that there is a significant increase in the MMP-2 level, but the TIMP-1 level and MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio both show insignificant results. Based on the existing data, higher levels of MMP-2 in the absence of other diseases can be used as a predictive factor for the existence of refractory H. pylori-induced PUD. However, the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio might not be used as a refractory H. pylori-induced PUD marker.

One of this study’s limitations is that we only focused on serum levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 due to our attempts to clarify the inconsistency in their levels in H. pylori-induced PUD. However, our findings suggest that these factors may have the potential to predict the resistance of H. pylori infection to treatment, which has not been previously explored.

Future studies should focus on comparing endoscopy-based histopathologic findings and serum levels of these molecules. This can be done by taking deeper biopsies of PUD sites and normal sites, comparing the levels of MMPs and TIMPs between different types and locations of ulcers, and studying their association with the duration of symptoms, as previous studies in mouse models have shown [22]. Additionally, it is recommended to conduct further studies to discover the relationship between other MMPs and TIMPs and the treatment response of H. pylori infection.

Conclusion

H. pylori-induced PUD can increase the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio but might not be a good predictor of refractory H. pylori-induced PUD. However, the increased MMP-2 level in the absence of other diseases can be used as a predictive marker for refractory H. pylori-induced PUD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

H. pylori:

Helicobacter pylori

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

TIMP:

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase

PUD:

Peptic ulcer disease

NSAIDs:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BM:

Basement membrane

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

MPO:

Myeloperoxidase

NE:

Neutrophil elastase

References

  1. Yim MH, Kim KH, Lee BJ. The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Keikha M, Ali-Hassanzadeh M, Karbalaei M. Association of Helicobacter pylori vacA genotypes and peptic ulcer in Iranian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Masclee GM, Valkhoff VE, Coloma PM, de Ridder M, Romio S, Schuemie MJ, et al. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding from different drug combinations. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(4):784-92.e9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chey WD, Wong BC, Gastroenterology PPCotACo. American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1808–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dechant F-X, Dechant R, Kandulski A, Selgrad M, Weber F, Reischl U, et al. Accuracy of different rapid urease tests in comparison with histopathology in patients with endoscopic signs of gastritis. Digestion. 1964;101(2):184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rostami-Nejad M, Villanacci V, Mashayakhi R, Molaei M, Bassotti G, Zojaji H, et al. Celiac disease and Hp infection association in Iran. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101(12):850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce MG, Bruden D, Newbrough D, Hurlburt DA, Hennessy TW, Morris JM, et al. The relationship between previous antimicrobial use, antimicrobial resistance and treatment outcome among Alaskans treated for Helicobacter pylori infection. GastroHep. 2019;1(4):172–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Longo GM, Xiong W, Greiner TC, Zhao Y, Fiotti N, Baxter BT. Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 work in concert to produce aortic aneurysms. J Clin Investig. 2002;110(5):625–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim K-H, Burkhart K, Chen P, Frevert CW, Randolph-Habecker J, Hackman RC, et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 deficiency amplifies acute lung injury in bleomycin-exposed mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;33(3):271–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Posselt G, Crabtree JE, Wessler S. Proteolysis in helicobacter pylori-induced gastric cancer. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9(4):134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergin PJ, Anders E, Sicheng W, Erik J, Jennie A, Hans L, et al. Increased production of matrix metalloproteinases in Helicobacter pylori-associated human gastritis. Helicobacter. 2004;9(3):201–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koyama S. Significance of cell-surface expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors on gastric epithelium and infiltrating mucosal lymphocytes in progression of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(11):1046–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadeghiani M, Bagheri N, Shahi H, Reiisi S, Rahimian G, Rashidi R, et al. cag Pathogenicity island-dependent upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-7 in infected patients with Helicobacter pylori. J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2017;38(6):595–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rautelin HI, Oksanen AM, Veijola LI, Sipponen PI, Tervahartiala TI, Sorsa TA, et al. Enhanced systemic matrix metalloproteinase response in Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Ann Med. 2009;41(3):208–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang C, Werb Z. The many faces of metalloproteases: cell growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(11):S37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Syggelos S, Giannopoulou E, Gouvousis P, Andonopoulos A, Aletras A, Panagiotopoulos E. In vitro effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cytokine, prostanoid and matrix metalloproteinase production by interface membranes from loose hip or knee endoprostheses. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(5):531–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourboulia D, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): positive and negative regulators in tumor cell adhesion. Semin Cancer Biol. 2010;20(3):161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Almuntashiri S, Alhumaid A, Zhu Y, Han Y, Dutta S, Khilji O, et al. TIMP-1 and its potential diagnostic and prognostic value in pulmonary diseases. Chin Med J Pulmonary Crit Care Med. 2023;1(2):67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor SL, Rogers GB, Chen AC, Burr LD, McGuckin MA, Serisier DJ. Matrix metalloproteinases vary with airway microbiota composition and lung function in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(5):701–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng H-C, Yang H-B, Chang W-L, Chen W-Y, Yeh Y-C, Sheu B-S. Expressions of MMPs and TIMP-1 in gastric ulcers may differentiate H. pylori-infected from NSAID-related ulcers. Sci World J. 2012;2012:539316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li SL, Zhao JR, Ren XY, Xie JP, Ma QZ, Rong QH. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 associated with gastric ulcer recurrence. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(28):4590–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Calabrò A, Grappone C, Pellegrini G, Evangelista S, Tramontana M, Schuppan D, et al. Spatial and temporal pattern of expression of interstitial collagenase, stromelysin/transin, gelatinase A, and TIMP-1 during experimental gastric ulcer healing. Digestion. 2004;70(2):127–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogihara A, Kikuchi S, Hasegawa A, Kurosawa M, Miki K, Kaneko E, et al. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and smoking and drinking habits. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15(3):271–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moayyedi P, Axon AT, Feltbower R, Duffett S, Crocombe W, Braunholtz D, et al. Relation of adult lifestyle and socioeconomic factors to the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(3):624–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bujanda L. The effects of alcohol consumption upon the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(12):3374–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fiotti N, Tubaro F, Altamura N, Grassi G, Moretti M, Dapas B, et al. Alcohol reduces MMP-2 in humans and isolated smooth muscle cells. Alcohol. 2008;42(5):389–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu J, Yang P, Qin X, Li C, Lv Y, Wang X. Impact of smoking on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2022;27(1):e12860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma L, Chow JYC, Cho CH. Cigarette smoking delays ulcer healing: role of constitutive nitric oxide synthase in rat stomach. Am J Physiol Gastrointestin Liver Physiol. 1999;276(1):G238–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ning W, Dong Y, Sun J, Li C, Matthay MA, Feghali-Bostwick CA, et al. Cigarette smoke stimulates matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity via EGR-1 in human lung fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36(4):480–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Garrow D, Delegge MH. Risk factors for gastrointestinal ulcer disease in the US population. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:66–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This article was prepared without any support or funding and.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

    Mohammad Negaresh

  2. School of Medicine and Allied Medical Sciences, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

    Elham Safarzadeh

  3. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

    Nasrin Fouladi

  4. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Digestive Diseases Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

    Somaieh Matin

  5. Students Research Committee, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

    Sanaz Pourfarzi

Authors
  1. Mohammad Negaresh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elham Safarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nasrin Fouladi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Somaieh Matin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sanaz Pourfarzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MN drafted, checked, and revised the manuscript; ES drafted or substantively revised the work; NF analyzed and interpreted the data; SM drafted and designed the work; and SP drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Somaieh Matin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (IR.ARUMS.REC.1399.081). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects according to the instructions of the Ethics Committee of the Ardabil University of Medical Sciences.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negaresh, M., Safarzadeh, E., Fouladi, N. et al. The evaluation of the MMP-2/TIMP-1 ratio in peptic ulcer and its association with refractory helicobacter pylori infection. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 287 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02923-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02923-z

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us