Skip to main content
Download PDF

Lower end of treatment HBsAg and HBcrAg were associated with HBsAg loss after nucleos(t)ide analog cessation

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 224 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Since hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is rarely achieved with nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment, most patients require life-long NA treatment. Previous studies have shown that some patients remain virologically responsive even after NA cessation. However, there is still controversy surrounding whether NA discontinuation increases the HBsAg loss rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the cumulative rate of HBsAg loss and identify the predictors of HBsAg loss after NA discontinuation.

Methods

This multicenter prospective study included HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients without cirrhosis from 12 hospitals in China who met the inclusion criteria. The enrolled patients stopped NA and were followed up with clinical and laboratory assessments every 3 months for 24 months after NA cessation or until clinical relapse (CR) occurred.

Results

Overall, 158 patients were classified into two groups. Group A included patients with HBsAg positivity at NA cessation (n = 139), and Group B included patients with HBsAg negativity at NA cessation (n = 19). In Group A, the 12-month and 24-month cumulative rates of HBsAg loss were4.3%and 9.4%, respectively. End of treatment (EOT) HBsAg (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.152, P < 0.001) and EOT hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) (HR = 0.257, P = 0.001) were associated with HBsAg loss. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for EOT HBsAg and HBcrAg levels were 0.952 (P < 0.001) and 0.765 (P < 0.001), respectively. Patients with EOT HBsAg ≤ 135 IU/mL (59.2% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) or HBcrAg ≤ 3.6 logU/mL (17% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.027) had a higher 24-month cumulative HBsAg loss rate. In Group B, none of the patients experienced virological relapse after NA cessation. Only 1 (5.3%) patient had HBsAg reversion.

Conclusions

EOT HBsAg ≤ 135 IU/mL or HBcrAg ≤ 3.6 logU/mL can be used to identify patients with a higher likelihood of HBsAg loss after NA cessation. Patients with HBsAg negativity after NA cessation have favorable clinical outcomes, and HBsAg loss was durable in most cases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Viral suppression using nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) improves the prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, NA treatment cannot eliminate intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) or achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance [1, 2]. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that a proportion of patients maintained virological response even after discontinuing NA, suggesting that cessation may increase the rate of HBsAg loss [1, 3]. For example, in the DARING-B study following 57 patients who discontinued NA, the cumulative rates of HBsAg loss were 5%, 16%, and 25% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively [4]. Another retrospective study from Taiwan, involving 691 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB patients who stopped treatment, revealed a 13% HBsAg loss after 6 years of treatment, which was significantly higher than that during treatment [1].

It is important to identify predictors that can determine which patients are more likely to experience HBsAg loss after NA cessation. Some studies have reported that patients with lower end-of-treatment (EOT) HBsAg levels have a higher chance of achieving HBsAg loss after NA discontinuation [5, 6]. However, other studies have failed to find a significant association [7, 8]. Evaluating the predictive value of other HBV serum markers, such as HBV core-related (HBcrAg) and HBV RNA, may be of interest, although data are scarce [6, 9]. Furthermore, several studies have explored the predictive power of combining these HBV markers.

However, research findings have indicated that NA-induced HBsAg loss shows similar durability to spontaneous HBsAg loss and is associated with favorable clinical outcomes [10, 11]. Several studies have shown that relapses are absent in patients with CHB who discontinue NA after HBsAg loss [12]. However, other studies have reported rates of HBsAg seroreversion ranging from 4.8 to 11.7% at 3 years after NA discontinuation [10, 11]. Whether NA-treated patients with HBsAg loss can safely stop NA treatment has not been well established.

Therefore, we conducted this prospective study to address two key questions: (1) the incidence and predictors of HBsAg loss after NA cessation and (2) whether HBsAg loss is durable in patients with HBsAg negativity upon NA cessation.

Methods

Patients

A total of 158 initially HBeAg-positive CHB patients without cirrhosis discontinued NA treatment and were followed up from January 2017 to December 2020 in 12 hospitals in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei provinces in China. The patients were classified into two groups according to their HBsAg status after NA cessation. Group A included patients with HBsAg positivity at NA cessation (n = 139), while Group B included patients with HBsAg negativity at NA cessation (n = 19).

The inclusion and exclusion criteria and follow-up schedule were described in our previous study [13]. Briefly, all patients met the NA cessation criteria, which included undetectable serum HBV DNA, normal serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and HBeAg seroconversion for at least 3 years. Additionally, the duration of NA treatment was more than 4 years, according to the Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B [14]. All patients discontinued NA upon entering this study and were followed-up every 3 months for 24 months or until clinical relapse (CR). Retreatment was initiated if CR was observed, defined as ALT level > 2 ULN along with an HBV DNA level of > 2000 IU/mL, which was considered virological relapse (VR). Consolidation therapy was defined as the duration of treatment from the first report of HBeAg seroconversion until NA cessation [13].

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University People’s Hospital (2017PHB001-01), and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Biochemical and virological test

Serum ALT levels were tested at local laboratories with the ULN set at 40 U/L. HBV DNA, HBsAg, and anti-HBs were assessed in a central laboratory located at Peking University People’s Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. HBV DNA was quantitatively detected using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HBV Test, with a lower detection limit of 20 IU/mL. Serum HBsAg and anti-HBs levels were quantified using an automated chemiluminescent assay (Architect I2000SR; Abbott). Range of the HBsAg test was 0.05–250 IU/mL. If the HBsAg level was > 250 IU/mL, serial dilutions from 1:100 to 1:1000 were performed. An anti-HBs level ≥ 10 mIU/mL was considered positive.

HBV RNA was isolated using the Diagnostic Kit for Hepatitis B virus pgRNA (PCR-Fluorescence Probing) (Hotgen Biotech, Beijing, China) and detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using an ABI Prism 7500 Real-time PCR System (ABI, USA). The lower detection limit was 300 copies/mL.

A chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Lumipulse G HBcrAg assay) was employed to measure serum HBcrAg levels using a Lumipulse G1200 analyzer manufactured by (Fujirebio, Japan). The lower limit of quantification was 3 logU/mL. In cases where the sample concentration was > 7 logU/mL, dilution and subsequence retesting were performed.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentages), while continuous variables were summarized as medians (interquartile ranges). The HBsAg and HBV RNA levels were logarithmically transformed for statistical analysis. To analyze the differences between groups, either the χ2 test or the Student t test was deployed. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to calculate the cumulative rates of HBsAg loss, which were compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of off-treatment HBsAg loss. The accuracy of the serum markers in predicting HBsAg loss was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P value < 0.05. Statistical analyses and representations were performed using IBM SPSS software version 26.0, while Graphical analyses and representation of data were conducted using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software.

Results

Group A: patients with HBsAg positive when NA cessation

Characteristics of patients at the start of treatment and end of treatment

Overall, 139 patients with HBsAg positivity at NA cessation were classified into Group A. All enrolled patients were of Asian descent, with 58.3% being male, and the median age was 36 years. All subjects were treated with NA for an average duration of 6.4 (4.7–8.6) years. The duration of undetectable HBV DNA and HBeAg seroconversion before NA cessation was 5.8 (4.3–7.8) years and 4 (3.5–5.8) years, respectively. The range of HBsAg ranged from 0.05 to18512.6 IU/mL. Among the patients 22 (15.8%) had EOT HBsAg levels < 100 IU/mL, and 39 (28.1%) had levels between 100 and 1,000 IU/mL.The 12-month cumulative rates of VR, CR, HBeAg reversion, and HBsAg loss were 38.8%, 15.1%, 8.6%,and 4.3%, respectively, and the corresponding 24-month cumulative rates were 50.4%, 24.5%, 11.5%,and 9.4%, respectively [13]. Patients with HBsAg loss (n = 13) had a lower percentage of a family history of hepatitis B (23.1% VS 53.2%, P = 0.039). The proportion of patients with HBsAg-loss was higher among males (P = 0.043), and they were older following NA cessation (P < 0.001). Significant differences in EOT HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA levels were observed between patients with and without HBsAg loss. Patients with HBsAg loss had lower HBsAg (median 0.7 vs. 3.2 log10IU/mL, P < 0.001) and HBcrAg (median 3.2 vs. 3.8 logU/mL, P = 0.001) levels at the end of treatment. Simultaneously, a higher proportion of them had negative HBV RNA (92.3 vs. 69%, P = 0.012) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of Group A patients at the start of treatment and end of treatment
Full size table

Kinetics of HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA after NA cessation

As shown in Fig. 1 (A)–(C), significant differences were observed in the levels of HBsAg and HBcrAg between patients with and without HBsAg loss. Patients with HBsAg loss had lower HBsAg (P < 0.001) and HBcrAg (P < 0.001 or P = 0.001) levels at the end of treatment and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after NA cessation, respectively. Notably, significant differences in HBV RNA levels were found at the end of treatment and at 18 and 24 months after NA cessation but not at 6 and 12 months after NA cessation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A)-(C), Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA at end of treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after treatment cessation in Group A patients with HBsAg loss or without HBsAg loss. (D)-(F), Comparison of HBsAg, HBcrAg and HBV RNA change from end of treatment to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment cessation in Group A patients with HBsAg loss or without HBsAg loss. The box plots showed median, interquartile range and absolute range

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 1 (D)–(F), rapid decreases in HBsAg (P < 0.001) and HBcrAg (P < 0.001 or P = 0.001) levels were observed from baseline to 6, 12, and 24months after NA discontinuation in patients with HBsAg loss. However, no significant differences were found inΔHBV RNA from baseline to 6, 12, and 24months after NA cessation (P > 0.05).

Predictors forHBsAg loss after NA cessation

Changes in HBsAg levels after NA cessation were reported in our previous study [13]. Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of HBsAg loss after NA cessation. Neither the treatment duration nor the consolidation treatment duration was associated with HBsAg loss. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.073–1.207; P < 0.001), EOT HBsAg level (HR, 0.152; 95% CI, 0.065–0.355; P < 0.001), and EOT HBcrAg level (HR, 0.257; 95% CI, 0.113–0.586; P = 0.001) were independent predictors of HBsAg loss. Rapid decreases in HBsAg and HBcrAg levels from baseline to 6-month (Δ6m), 12-month (Δ12m), and 24-month (Δ24m) after NA discontinuation were also associated with HBsAg loss (Table 2).

Table 2 Predictors for HBsAg loss in Group A patients by Cox regression
Full size table

To further assess the ability of EOT HBsAg, EOT HBcrAg, EOT HBV RNA, ΔHBsAg, ΔHBcrAg, and ΔHBV RNA levels to predict HBsAg loss, AUROC values for each parameter were calculated (Fig. 2). An EOT HBsAg level of 135 IU/mL had the highest Youden’s index with an AUROC value of 0.952 (95% CI 0.906–0.998, P < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.923, and specificity of 0.897. The AUROC values of ΔHBsAg at 6 and 12 months were 0.920 (95% CI 0.852–0.988, P < 0.001) and 0.972 (95% CI 0.942-1, P < 0.001), respectively. An EOT HBcrAg of 3.6 IU/mL had the maximum Youden’s index with an AUROC value of 0.765 (95% CI 0.635–0.895, P = 0.002), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.667. The AUROC value of ΔHBcrAg at 6 months and 12 months were 0.744 (95% CI 0.603–0.884, P = 0.004), 0.742 (95% CI 0.586–0.898, P = 0.004), respectively. EOT HBV RNA and ΔHBV RNA levels failed to predict HBsAg loss after NA cessation at 6, 12, and 24 months (P > 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

(A) Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of end of treatment (EOT) hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA for predicting HBsAg loss in Group A patients. (B) ΔHBsAg as a predictor of HBsAg loss at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment cessation. (C) ΔHBcrAg as a predictor of HBsAg loss at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment cessation. (D) ΔHBV RNA as a predictor of HBsAg loss at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment cessation

Full size image

Stratified analysis of cumulative HBsAg loss rate

As shown in Fig. 3, the cumulative probabilities of HBsAg loss were stratified based on EOT HBsAg, HBcrAg, or HBV RNA levels. Over a 24 months period after NA cessation, cumulative rates of HBsAg loss in patients with EOT HBsAg ≤ 135 IU/mL and > 135 IU/mL were 59.2% and 1.3%, respectively (P < 0.001, Fig. 3A). Stratifying the cumulative incidences of HBsAg loss by EOT HBcrAg ≤ 3.6 logU/mL and > 3.6 logU/mL revealed rates of 17% and 5.4%, respectively (P = 0.021, Fig. 3B). No significant difference was observed between patients with EOT HBV RNA-negative and EOT HBV RNA-positive patients (15.3% vs.3.6%, P = 0.081; Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cumulative incidences of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss stratified by end of treatment (EOT) HBsAg, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA in Group A patients

Full size image

Group B: patients with HBsAg negative when NA cessation

Characteristics of patients at the start of treatment and end of treatment

A total of 19 patients (68.4% male; median age, 60 years) with HBsAg negative when NA cessation were classified into Group B. All patients were treated for a duration of 6.8 (5.8–12.8) years with NA. Among them, Nine (47.4%) were treated with entecavir, and 36.8% were treated with non-first-line NA therapy. The duration of undetectable HBV DNA and HBeAg seroconversion before the end of treatment was 6 (4.8–12) years and 4 (3.8–6.1) years, respectively. Following HBsAg loss, NA treatment was continued for 1.8 (1–3) years in all the patients (Table 3).

Table 3 Characteristics of Group B patients at the start of treatment and end of treatment
Full size table

Virological relapse, clinical relapse, and HBsAg reversion after NA cessation

The median follow-up duration was 21 (12–24) months. None of the patients achieved VR or CR after NA cessation. Only one patient (5.3%) experienced HBsAg reverse-positive at 6 months. HBV DNA was detectable at 21 months but remained below 2000 IU/mL after NA cessation. Throughout the 24 months follow-up period after NA cessation, this patient exhibited detectable HBV DNA (< 2000 IU/mL) without any elevation in ALT levels.

Changes in serum anti-HBs, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA levels after NA cessation

The patient who experienced HBsAg reversion at 6 months after NA cessation exhibited anti-HBs positivity at the end of treatment (10.83 mIU/mL) and at 3 months after NA cessation (12.88 mIU/mL). Among the remaining 18 patients in Group B, 9 patients had positive anti-HBs levels at the end of treatment, which remained positive during follow-up, with a majority showing an increasing trend. Three patients initially tested negative for anti-HBs at the end of treatment but later tested positive after NA cessation. The other six patients consistently tested negative for ani-HBs both at the end of treatment and during follow-up. After the 24-month follow-up, no significant difference in anti-HB levels was found between EOT and the end of the follow-up (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dynamic changes of anti-HBs, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA levels at end of treatment and end of follow-up in Group B patients (n = 18, excluding one patient with HBsAg reversion)

Full size image

Serum HBV RNA was positive in 2 patients after NA cessation, including the patient with HBsAg reversion. Serum HBV RNA levels fluctuated positively in 5 other patients after withdrawal, accompanied by an increasing trend in anti-HBs. In contrast, seven patients with positive serum HBcrAg levels at EOT remained positive after NA discontinuation. Compared to serum HBV RNA, serum HBcrAg levels demonstrated relatively stable fluctuations with minimal changes (Fig. 4BC).

Discussion

In this prospective multicenter study, we evaluated the HBsAg loss and changes in HBV serological markers after NA cessation. Our results showed that a subset of patients (9.4%) achieved HBsAg loss, and both EOT HBsAg and HBcrAg levels were useful in identifying patients with a higher likelihood of HBsAg loss after NA cessation. Specifically, EOT HBsAg level was the strongest predictor of HBsAg loss, aligning with previous studies [1, 5, 6]. Notably, EOT HBsAg ≤ 135 IU/mL had good predictability for HBsAg loss, offering high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, our data also showed that EOT HbcrAg ≤ 3.6logU/mL could effectively predict HBsAg loss after NA discontinuation. This study focused on the outcomes of HBsAg-negative patients following NA cessation, demonstrating that these patients maintained a functional cure and had good long-term prognosis during the 24 months follow-up.

Although the discontinuation of NA remains a matter of debate in clinical practice, NA cessation is recommended in all current treatment guidelines. In this study, we used the Chinese NA cessation criteria, which limit longer treatment and consolidation therapy, to provide more research data for discussing different NA withdrawal criteria. Growing evidence has shown that a significant, albeit small, proportion of patients with CHB achieve HBsAg loss after NA discontinuation. HBsAg loss rates after NA discontinuation vary widely among studies. Our patients demonstrated a relatively low rate of HBsAg loss after cessation of NA treatment. Similar results were reported in a study from Germany [15] and several studies from Asia [1, 16], whereas higher rates of HBsAg loss were found in other studies [5, 17, 18]. It is unclear whether these differences stem from ethnicity or other potential confounding factors. Our current study, comprising exclusively of Asians, suggests that Asian ethnicities may have lower rates of HBsAg loss than non-Asian ethnicities, consistent with Sonneveld’s study [19]. It is difficult to compare the rates of HBsAg loss among studies because of different patients and viral characteristics, and most importantly, different baseline and EOT HBsAg levels. These are remarkable findings compared with the very low HBsAg loss rate during NA treatment. The mechanism underlying HBsAg loss after the cessation of NA treatment remains unclear. Long-term NA treatment has been hypothesized to modulate and restore T-cell responses [20]. The reappearance of HBV replication after NA cessation is considered an essential trigger that may ultimately lead to complete immune control of HBV infection [21].

Berg et al. [22] proposed that NA discontinuation-associated relapse is an integral part of the stop-to-cure approach and ultimately triggers HBsAg loss. After NA cessation, HBV DNA and ALT flares are often transient in patients who relapse. Whether there are, favorable and unfavorable flares in terms of the induction of long-term remission and HBsAg loss and how to distinguish between them is controversial, as is the question of why only a minority of patients achieve a functional cure. However, our data did not support the concept that HBsAg loss occurs more frequently in patients with relapse. In our study, only one patient who lost HBsAg had clinical relapse, and the remaining 12 patients did not have VR or CR. Notably, the occurrence of HBsAg loss was significantly or numerically less frequent in patients with HBV DNA or ALT flares, which is consistent with the findings of other studies [1, 23]. Given the conflicting results in this area, it is important to identify additional markers related to HBsAg loss after the discontinuation of NAs.

HBsAg as a serological indicator of transcriptionally active cccDNA, and has been identified as a reliable predictor of both relapse and HBsAg loss after NA cessation. In most studies, a greater HBsAg decline during treatment and lower EOT HBsAg levels have been associated with a higher likelihood of HBsAg loss after NA discontinuation [1, 16, 19, 24]. However, the use of EOT HBsAg cutoff level as a predictor of HBsAg loss remains controversial. In the DARING-B study, patients with EOT HBsAg levels < 100 IU/mL exhibited a remarkable f HBsAg loss rate of up to 77%, at 18 months after stopping NA treatment [6]. Similarly, in another study involving 411 patients, the 8-year HBsAg loss rate was 69.3% in HBeAg-negative patients with EOT HBsAg < 200 IU/mL, while the 5-year HBsAg loss rate was 47.3% in HBeAg-positive patients with EOT HBsAg < 300 IU/mL [25]. Our results showed that patients with EOT HBsAg ≤ 135 IU/mL had a high rate (59.2%) of HBsAg loss 24 months after NA cessation, whereas patients with EOT HBsAg > 135 IU/mL rarely achieved HBsAg loss (1.3%) (Fig. 3). However, It should be noted that EOT HBsAg levels ≤ 135 IU/mL were only observed in a very small proportion of patients (18%) undergoing long-term NA treatment. Therefore, this criterion alone cannot be relied upon to select patients who are likely to achieve HBsAg loss after stopping NA treatment. Emerging data suggest that lower EOT HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA levels are associated with a functional cure. In addition, the combination of two or more viral markers, including EOT HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA, have been shown to be more predictive for HBsAg loss after NA treatment cessation [26, 27].

Serum HBcrAg is another novel marker that strongly correlates with intrahepatic cccDNA. Even when serum HBV DNA is undetectable or HBsAg loss is achieved, HBcrAg may be detectable for a long time, enabling it to reflect the HBV status after NA cessation [28,29,30]. Emerging data explore whether EOT HBcrAg levels are associated with different outcomes. A study by Hsu et al. [31] in Taiwan showed that higher HBcrAg levels were associated with an increased risk of clinical relapse. Another study by Papatheodoridis et al. [4] did not support an association between HBcrAg levels and clinical relapse. It remains unclear whether HBcrAg is a good marker for identifying who can stop NA. However, few studies have investigated the predictive ability of EOT HBcrAg levels for HBsAg loss after NA cessation. Sonneveld’s study showed that undetectable HBcrAg levels at the end of treatment were associated with higher rates of HBsAg loss [21]. In our study, patients with HBsAg loss had lower HBcrAg (P = 0.001) compared to those without HBsAg loss. The results of the Cox regression analysis showed that EOT HBcrAg (HR, 0.257; 95% CI, 0.113–0.586; P = 0.001) was an independent predictor of HBsAg loss (Table 2). Among our patients, those with EOT HBcrAg ≤ 3.6 logU/mL had a high rate (17%) of HBsAg loss at 24 months after NA cessation (Fig. 3). Overall, it remains unclear whether EOT HBcrAg level could serve as a reliable marker for selecting patients who can achieve HBsAg loss after NA cessation. Therefore, further studies are needed to address this issue. As the lower limit of quantification was 3 logU/mL, the limitation of detection may explain why the influence of EOT HBcrAg on HBsAg loss was not obvious in all patients. In the future, EOT HBcrAg might be a useful marker to predict HBsAg loss after NA deletion if the HBcrAg assay can detect lower values. However, it should be noted that serum HBcrAg may become undetectable in HBeAg-negative patients undergoing long-term NA therapy, thus limiting its predictive power [6, 9].

Recently, serum HBV RNA has emerged as a potential biomarker for HBV replication, capable of detection even after NA discontinuation has been studied as an emerging biomarker HBV replication was researched as an emerging biomarker for HBV replication, which could be detectable even after NA discontinuation. In most studies, low or undetectable serum HBV RNA levels have been associated with a reduction in relapse [9, 32, 33]. In our previous study, patients with negative EOT HBV RNA had a significantly lower rate of virological relapse 24 months after NA cessation (39.4% vs. 77.5%, P < 0.001) [13]. In this study including the same populations, EOT HBV RNA (P = 0.012) was observed in patients with and without HBsAg loss (Table 1). However, EOT HBV RNA level (HR, 0.531; 95% CI, 0.235–1.199; P = 0.127) was not an independent predictor of HBsAg loss (Table 2). The detection of HBV RNA provides ancillary information and highlights the limitations of HBsAg and HBV DNA detection in predicting relapse after NA cessation. Until now, studies on the correlation between HBV RNA and HBsAg loss have been scarce and urgently needed.

In this study, decreased levels of HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA from the EOT to 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after NA cessation were defined as ΔHBsAg, ΔHBcrAg, and ΔHBV RNA, respectively, to predict HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive patients. The results showed that rapid decrease of HBsAg and HBcrAg from baseline to 6-month (Δ6m), 12-month (Δ12m), and 24-month (Δ24m) after NA cessation were associated with HBsAg loss, but ΔHBV RNA failed to predict the HBsAg loss after NA cessation. We explored operable predictive factors that could guide NA discontinuation, therefore, changes in these HBV markers after NA cessation cannot be used to select patients who can benefit from discontinuing NA treatment. However, monitoring the decline in HBsAg at 6 and 12 months would be an effective method for selecting patients who can achieve HBsAg loss by adhering to NA cessation.

Our study included 19 patients who achieved HBsAg loss when NA treatment was discontinued. It remians unclear whether consolidation treatment after HBsAg loss is required before NA discontinuation. In our study, NA treatment was continued for 1.8 (1–3) years after HBsAg loss in all patients (Table 3). Other studies have reported median consolidation duration ranging from 7 to 32.5 months [26, 34]. A study from Spain showed that consolidation duration did not affect the persistence of HBsAg loss or the development of anti-HBs after NA cessation [34]. Because of the difficulty associated with conducting a prospective randomized study, a consolidation duration of up to 12 months has been proposed. The development of anti-HBs after HBsAg loss may reflect more profound host immune pressure, leading to more effective control of HBV replication [35]. In this study, anti-HBs were detected at the time of treatment discontinuation in 52.6% of the patients, and no significant difference in anti-HB levels was observed between EOT and 24-month after NA cessation (Fig. 4A). Only one patient with HBsAg reversion 6 months after NA cessation was anti-HBs-positive at the end of treatment. The impact of anti-HBs development is uncertain, however, it appears that the absence of anti-HBs does not confer a poorer prognosis [26, 36]. Only two studies included patients with HBsAg loss at the time of NA cessation, and the number of patients included was relatively small [9, 37]. Therefore, although the number of patients with HBsAg loss in this study was too small to draw conclusions, the results are representative and valuable for future studies. This study showed that patients with HBsAg loss during NA treatment had a good long-term prognosis after NA cessation during a follow-up period of 24 months.

Our study has some limitations. First, only initially HBeAg-positive patients were included in this study. Therefore, further investigation is needed to determine whether our findings can be applied to initially HBeAg-negative patients. Second, to avoid significant liver injury, patients were retreated once a clinical relapse occurred. Therefore, comparing the rates of off-treatment HBsAg loss between patients with and without retreatment was not possible. Third, only Asian patients were included in this study, and their application to Western patients requires further investigation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, decisions regarding NA cessation should be made with a thorough understanding of both medical and patient-related factors. Close follow-ups and strict patient adherence are required to reduce the risk of significant disease relapse and liver failure after NA discontinuation. The wider use of biomarkers that reflect the transcriptional activity of cccDNA in HBV DNA-undetectable settings, such as HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA, would help physicians in identifying patients with a lower risk of relapse and a higher likelihood of HBsAg loss, thus enabling them to discontinue NA treatment. According to our findings, patients with HBsAg ≤ 135 IU/mL or HBcrAg ≤ 3.6 logU/mL who discontinue NA treatment may have a higher chance of achieving off-treatment HBsAg loss. Furthermore, patients with HBsAg negativity at NA cessation exhibited favorable clinical outcomes, and HBsAg loss was durable in most cases during 24 months follow-up.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AUROC:

Area under thereceiver operating characteristic

cccDNA:

Covalently closed circular DNA

CHB:

Chronic hepatitis B

CI:

Confidence interval

CR:

Clinical relapse

EOT:

End of treatment

HBcrAg:

Hepatitis B core-related antigen

HBeAg:

Hepatitis B e antigen

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HBsAg:

Hepatitis B surface antigen

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HR:

Hazard ratio

NA:

Nucleos(t)ide analogue

VR:

Virological relapse

References

  1. Jeng WJ, Chen YC, Chien RN, et al. Incidence and predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2018;68:425–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marcellin P, Wong DK, Sievert W, et al. Ten-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Liver Int. 2019;39:1868–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Hees S, Chi H, Hansen B, et al. Sustained off-treatment viral control is associated with high hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance rates in caucasian patients with nucleos(t)ide analogue-induced HBeAg seroconversion. J Viral Hepatitis. 2019;26:766–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papatheodoridis GV, Rigopoulou EI, Papatheodoridi M, et al. DARING-B: discontinuation of effective entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate long-term therapy before HBsAg loss in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Antivir Ther. 2018;23:677–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadziyannis SJ, Sevastianos V, Rapti I, et al. Sustained responses and loss of HBsAg in HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B who stop long-term treatment with adefovir. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:629–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Papatheodoridi M, Hadziyannis E, Berby F, et al. Predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen loss, relapse and retreatment after discontinuation of effective oral antiviral therapy in noncirrhotic HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2020;27:118–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ha M, Zhang G, Diao S, et al. A prospective clinical study in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with stringent cessation criteria for adefovir. Arch Virol. 2012;157:285–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen CH, Hung CH, Hu TH, et al. Association between level of hepatitis B surface antigen and relapse after entecavir therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1984–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey I, Gersch J, Wang B, et al. Pregenomic HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen predict outcomes in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients suppressed on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. Hepatology. 2020;72:42–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim GA, Lim YS, An J, et al. HBsAg seroclearance after nucleoside analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: clinical outcomes and durability. Gut. 2014;63:1325–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yip TC, Wong GL, Wong VW, et al. Durability of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in untreated and nucleos(t)ide analogue-treated patients. J Hepatol. 2018;68:63–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chi H, Wong D, Peng J, et al. Durability of response after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in a multiethnic cohort of chronic hepatitis B patients: results after treatment cessation. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:680–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie YD, Li MH, Ou XJ, et al. HBeAg-positive patients with HBsAg < 100 IU/mL and negative HBV RNA have lower risk of virological relapse after nucleos(t)ide analogues cessation. J Gastroenterol. 2021;56:856–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou JL, Lai W. [The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B: a 2015 update]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2015;23:888–905.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Bömmel F, Stein K, Heyne R, et al. A multicenter randomized-controlled trial of nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2023;78:926–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CH, Lu SN, Hung CH, et al. The role of hepatitis B surface antigen quantification in predicting HBsAg loss and HBV relapse after discontinuation of lamivudine treatment. J Hepatol. 2014;61:515–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan HL, Wong GL, Chim AM, et al. Prediction of off-treatment response to lamivudine by serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantification in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients. Antivir Ther. 2011;16:1249–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen H, Ding X, Liao G, et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics after discontinuation of and retreatment with oral antivirals in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2021;28:1121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sonneveld MJ, Chiu SM, Park JY, et al. Probability of HBsAg loss after nucleo(s)tide analogue withdrawal depends on HBV genotype and viral antigen levels. J Hepatol. 2022;76:1042–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boni C, Laccabue D, Lampertico P, et al. Restored function of HBV-specific T cells after long-term effective therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(4):963–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rinker F, Zimmer CL, Höner Zu Siederdissen C, Manns MP, Kraft ARM, Wedemeyer H, et al. Hepatitis B virus-specific T cell responses after stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2018;69:584–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berg T, Lampertico P. The times they are a-changing - A refined proposal for finite HBV nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. J Hepatol. 2021;75:474–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Manolakopoulos S, Kranidioti H, Kourikou A, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued nucleos(t)ide analogues. Liver Int. 2021;41:48–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, Li T, Zhang L, et al. The role of hepatitis B surface antigen in nucleos(t)ide analogues cessation among asian patients with chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review. Hepatology. 2019;70:1045–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen CH, Hung CH, Wang JH, et al. Long-term incidence and predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen loss after discontinuing nucleoside analogues in noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seto WK, Cheung KS, Wong DK, et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during nucleoside analogue therapy: surface antigen kinetics, outcomes, and durability. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:487–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan R, Peng J, Xie Q, Tan D, Xu M, Niu J, et al. Combining hepatitis B virus RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen: guidance for safely stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:611–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seto WK, Wong DK, Fung J, et al. Linearized hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core-related antigen in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:1173–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng TN, Hu TH, Wang JH, et al. Incidence and factors associated with HBV relapse after cessation of entecavir or tenofovir in patients with HBsAg below 100 IU/mL. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:2803–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Testoni B, Lebossé F, Scholtes C, et al. Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) correlates with covalently closed circular DNA transcriptional activity in chronic hepatitis B patients. J Hepatol. 2019;70:615–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsu Y, Nguyen MH, Mo L, et al. Combining hepatitis B core-related and surface antigens at end of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment to predict off-therapy relapse risk. Aliment Pharm Ther. 2019;49:107–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Seto WK, Liu KS, Mak LY, et al. Role of serum HBV RNA and hepatitis B surface antigen levels in identifying asian patients with chronic hepatitis B suitable for entecavir cessation. Gut. 2021;70:775–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang J, Shen T, Huang X, et al. Serum hepatitis B virus RNA is encapsidated pregenome RNA that may be associated with persistence of viral infection and rebound. J Hepatol. 2016;65:700–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Suárez E, Buti M, Rodríguez M, et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen loss after discontinuing nucleos(t)ide analogue for treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients is persistent in White patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;31:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chu CM, Liaw YF. Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatitis B viremia after spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in hepatitis B carriers. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:88–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wong RJ, Nguyen MT, Trinh HN, et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen loss and sustained viral suppression in asian chronic hepatitis B patients: a community-based real-world study. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24:1089–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pfefferkorn M, Schott T, Böhmet S, et al. Composition of HBsAg is predictive of HBsAg loss during treatment in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2021;74:283–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Xiajie Wen for her help in statistical analysis methods.

Funding

The work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission of Major Projects (No. D161100002716002), National Major Science and Technology Project of China (No. 2017ZX10302201-004-001, No. 2017ZX10203202-003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82000557) and the Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Funds (RDY2020-12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Hepatitis C and Immunotherapy for Liver Diseases, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Hepatology Institute, Beijing International Cooperation Base for Science and Technology on NAFLD Diagnosis, Beijing, 100044, China

    Yandi Xie & Bo Feng

  2. Department of Hepatology Division, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China

    Minghui Li

  3. Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China

    Xiaojuan Ou

  4. Complicated Liver Diseases and Artificial Liver Treatment and Training Center, Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Treatment and Research, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China

    Sujun Zheng

  5. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100039, China

    Yinjie Gao

  6. Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China

    Xiaoyuan Xu

  7. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Xingtai, Xingtai, Hebei, 054001, China

    Ying Yang

  8. Department of Infectious Disease, Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China

    Anlin Ma

  9. Department of Liver Disease, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China

    Jia Li

  10. Department of Traditional and Western Medical Hepatology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China

    Yuemin Nan

  11. Department of Liver Disease, Shijiazhuang Fifth Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050021, China

    Huanwei Zheng

  12. Research Center for Technologies in Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnostics, Changsha, Hunan, 410205, China

    Juan Liu

  13. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Disease, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China

    Lai Wei

Authors
  1. Yandi Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minghui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaojuan Ou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sujun Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yinjie Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoyuan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ying Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anlin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yuemin Nan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Huanwei Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Juan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lai Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Bo Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BF and LW designed the study. YDX, MHL, XJO, SJZ, YJG, XYX, YY, ALM, JL, YMN, HWZ and JL peformed the study and collected data. YDX and JL performed the statistical analysis. YDX, MHL and SJZ wrote the manuscript draft. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University People’s Hospital (2017PHB001-01), and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Y., Li, M., Ou, X. et al. Lower end of treatment HBsAg and HBcrAg were associated with HBsAg loss after nucleos(t)ide analog cessation. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 224 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02852-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02852-x

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us