Skip to main content
Download PDF

Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and associated factors among university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 130 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom is a relapsing chronic medical condition resulting from the reflux of gastric acid contents into the esophagus and throat or mouth. It interferes with social functioning, sleep, productivity, and quality of life. Despite this, the magnitude of GERD symptoms is not known in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the prevalence and associated factors of GERD symptoms among university students in the Amhara national regional state.

Methods

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was employed in Amhara national regional state Universities, from April 1, 2021, to May 1, 2021. Eight hundred and forty-six students were included in the study. A stratified multistage sampling technique was employed. Data were collected by using a pretested self-administered questionnaire. Data were entered via Epi Data version 4.6.0.5 and analyzed by SPSS version-26 software. The bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to determine the associated factors of GERD symptoms. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Variables having a p-value of ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The prevalence of GERD symptoms in this study was 32.1% (95% CI = 28.7–35.5%). Being in the age of 20–25 years (AOR = 1.74, 95%CI = 1.03–2.94), female (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.15–2.41), use of antipain (AOR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.65–3.69) and soft drinks (AOR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.13–2.20) were significantly associated with higher odds of GERD symptoms. Urban dwellers had less chance of having GERD symptoms (AOR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48–0.94).

Conclusion

Nearly one-third of university students are affected by GERD symptoms. Age, sex, residence, use of antipain, and consumption of soft drinks were significantly associated with GERD. Reducing modifiable risk factors such as antipain use and soft drink consumption among students is advisable to decrease the disease burden.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic medical condition resulting from the reflux of gastric acid contents into the esophagus and throat or mouth to cause distressing symptoms /complications [1, 2]. It also develops due to sensorimotor disorder associated with impairment of the normal anti-reflux mechanisms and with changes in normal physiology [3].

The pooled global prevalence of GERD is 14% [4]. This magnitude varies by region, ranging from 2.5 to 33.1%, in North America, Europe, East Asia, the Middle East, Australia, and South America population [5]. The prevalence of GERD ranges from 11.8 to 52.6% among university students [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a potentially serious condition with risks of complications like stricture of the esophagus, Barrett’s esophagus (pre-cancerous lesion), and malignancy, [14] and could be turned into a life-threatening disease [15]. It had extra-esophageal complications such as chronic cough, chronic laryngitis, asthma, and dental erosions [2]. Due to its chronic pain, and persistent and disruptive symptoms, GERD can impair physical and mental health-related quality of life, workplace productivity (daily tasks), social function, sleep, and diet, as well as cause anxiety and depression [7, 10, 16, 17]. Gastroesophageal reflux disease can cause an economic burden due to the disease’s diagnostic and therapeutic management [11]. Heartburn, regurgitation of food, vomiting, and regurgitation during sleep [18] are the most common symptoms of GERD. Based on these symptoms, a clinical diagnosis of GERD could be made [19].

Sociodemographic, lifestyle, dietary, and behavioral, as well as psychological factors, are associated with GERD [4, 19,20,21,22,23]. These were sex, age, residence, [7, 11, 18, 19, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] sleeping within 1 h of dinner [8, 20, 24].

Consumption of caffeinated and soft drinks, [8, 9, 18, 24, 33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] and types of food consumption [8, 35, 37,38,39, 41,42,43,44]. Inadequate sleep, [7, 20] smoking, [8, 11, 19, 23,24,25, 28, 31, 36, 40, 41, 44,45,46,47] history of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or analgesics, [20, 21, 28, 32, 35, 45, 47,48,49,50], and alcohol consumption, [19, 20, 23, 39, 40, 46, 51] were associated with GERD symptoms.

Even though GERD symptoms can negatively impact one’s quality of life, daily tasks, and the country’s economy by requiring the purchase of medication to alleviate GERD symptoms in university students, the burden of GERD symptoms in Ethiopian university students has not been quantified. As a result, this research aimed to assess the prevalence of GERD symptoms and its associated factors among university students in Ethiopia’s Amhara area. Stakeholders will use the outcomes of this study to develop illness prevention, care, and early treatment methods.

Methods

Study settings, period, and design

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was employed in Amhara national regional state Universities, from April 1, 2021, to May 1, 2021. Amhara’s national regional state is in North Ethiopia and its capital city is Bahir Dar. There are 10 government-owned Universities in Amhara national regional state and, from these Universities; three of them were selected by using the lottery method for the study; namely, the University of Gondar, Wollo, and Woldia University.

Source and study population

All government university students in the Amhara region were the source population, and all regular undergraduate students registered in the University of Gondar, Wollo, and Woldia University in the 2020/21 academic year were the study population.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size was calculated using single population proportion formula, with the assumption of 95% CI (Za/2 = 1.96), 5% (α = 0.05) level of significance, 5% (d = 0.05) margin of error, and proportion of 50% (no study done about GERD in Ethiopia), accordingly, the calculated sample size for the study became 384.

After adding a 10% non-response rate, the calculated sample size was 423. Since we have used multistage random sampling, this sample was multiplied by the design effect of two. Therefore, the final total sample size for this study was 846.

Three Universities were chosen using a simple random selection methodology (lottery method) out of the total Universities in the Amhara region. There were 25,272 undergraduate regular program students registered at the three selected Universities. The University of Gondar had 9,607 students, whereas Wollo University had 8,866 students and Woldia University had 6,799 students. Three hundred and twenty-two students from the University of Gondar, 297 from Wollo University, and 227 from Woldia University were chosen using proportionate allocation. After that, a proportional sample of these universities was assigned to the departments (health and non-health). A simple random sample procedure was used to pick research participants from each department (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of sampling procedure for the prevalence and associated factors of GERD among university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021

Full size image

Study variables

The dependent variable was gastroesophageal reflux disease. Students were said to have GERD symptoms when the Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score was ≥ 8 [52].

The independent variables were age, sex, marital status, year of study, department, residence, types of food consumed, eating habits, skipping breakfast, the timing of sleep soft drink consumption, sleep pattern (length of sleep per day), alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, khat chewing and history of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or analgesics.

Operational definitions

Fasting food-is food that is eaten during fasting and is free from dairy, egg, and meat products.

Spicy food -food that has been prepared with the use of spices or herbs that give it a pungent or hot flavor such as paper and chili.

Fatty food- any food that contains a high level of fat like dairy, egg, and meat products.

Fried or cooked food -is cooking of food in hot fats or oils, usually done with a shallow oil bath in a pan over a fire in which the food is completely immersed in a deeper vessel of hot oil.

Data collection tools and procedures

A semi-structured self-administered questionnaire and the Gastroesophageal reflux diseases questionnaire (GERDQ) were used to collect data. The GERDQ was a patient-centered, self-assessment tool that helped doctors diagnose, manage, and assess GERD symptoms without requiring an initial expert referral or endoscopy [52]. It also had diagnostic value in an unselected population presenting with typical and/or atypical GERD symptoms [53]. The participants were asked to recall their symptoms and the frequency with which they occurred throughout the previous seven days, according to GERDQ. Positive symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation (reflux), heartburn and reflux disrupting sleep at night, and the need for further drugs were rated as follows: 0, 1, 2, and 3 points for 0 days, 1 day, 2–3 days, and 4–7 days, respectively. Second, the frequency of negative symptoms (upper abdominal pain and nausea): 3, 2, 1, and 0 points for 0 days, 1 day, 2–3 days, and 4–7 days, respectively.

The sum of the points for these frequencies served as a subject’s GERDQ scores, and GERD symptoms were diagnosed if the sum was greater than or equal to 8 points [52]. Six BSc Nurses and three BSc Public Health professionals were involved in data collection and supervision, respectively. Before collecting data, select study participants from health and non-health department based on the proportional allocation method from these selected universities. Then, select the study participants by lottery method based on their identification number which is obtained from each university’s registrar. Then after, the data collectors inform the study participants about the study’s purpose and objectives. Provide instruction to the students so they can fill out the questionnaires correctly, comprehend the questions, and avoid writing their names or other unneeded information about themselves.

Data quality control

The questionnaire was translated from the English version into the local language (Amharic version) and then retranslated back to English to ensure consistency. A pretest was conducted on 5% of the sample at Mekdela Amba University students. Appropriate training was given to the data collectors and supervisors. The collected data were checked for completeness, consistency, and accuracy on daily basis by the principal investigator.

Data processing and analysis

Data were entered into Epi Data version 4.6.0.5 and then, exported into SPSS version-26 software for data analysis. Bivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the associated factors of GERD symptoms.

All variables with a p-value ≤ 0.25 at bivariable binary logistic regression analysis were entered into the multivariable binary logistic regression model. The strength of association was described by computing the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Variables having a p-value ≤ 0.05 in the final model were considered statistically significant.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents

Eight hundred and forty-six students were included in the study and the overall response rate was 93.5%. The age of the respondents ranges from 19 to 30 years with a median of 22 years and an interquartile range of two (2). Most of the respondents 464 (58.7%) were males and 486 (61.5%) were Orthodox Christianity followers. Most of the respondents, 705 (89.2%)) were unmarried and 648 (81.9%) were from the non-health department. Nearly half of the respondents (53.4%) were urban dwellers and 290 (36.7%) were a second year (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021, (n = 791)
Full size table

Lifestyle, dietary, and behavioral characteristics of the respondents

Of the total respondents, 542 (68.6%) took fasting food frequently and almost three-fourths (76.1%) of the respondents take food from university cafes. Nearly half of the respondents (52%) had the habit of eating quickly and 51.7% did not skip breakfast. Three-fourths of the respondents (74.5%) had a sleep after dinner for more than or equal to 2 h. Regarding tea and coffee consumption, 403 (51%) and 481(61%) of the respondents did not frequently drink tea and coffee, respectively. Most of the respondents (63.5%) did not take soft drinks frequently. Most of the respondents were not smokers (93.4%) and khat chewers (90.1%). Most of the respondents (62.4%) were not alcohol drinkers. Half of the respondents (50.9%) had a sleep duration of fewer than seven hours, and 646 (81.7%) students did not use antipain medication (Table 2).

Table 2 Lifestyle, dietary and behavioral factors of university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021, (n = 791)
Full size table

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux diseases symptoms

The prevalence of GERD symptoms among university students in the Amhara region was 32.1%(95%CI = 28.7–35.5%). Regarding positive symptoms of GERD, 45.5% of the respondents had heartburn, 40.4% had regurgitation, 39% had sleep disturbance due to heartburn and regurgitation, and 18.2% used medication for relief from heartburn and regurgitation in the previous week. Concerning negative symptoms of GERD symptoms, 54.8% and 61% of the respondents had not experienced epigastric pain and nausea in the previous week, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms among university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021, (n = 791)
Full size table

Factors associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease

On bivariable binary logistic regression analysis, age, sex, residence, year of study, types of food consumed, place of feeding, skip breakfast, cigarette smoking, chewing khat, use of anti-pain, frequent use of coffee and tea, and soft drink were associated with GERD symptoms (p ≤ 0.25).

In multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, age, place of residence, sex, use of antipain, and soft drink were significantly associated with GERD symptoms (p ≤ 0.05). The odds of having GERD symptoms were 1.74 times higher among the age group of 20–25 years compared to those respondents aged less than 20 years (AOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.03–2.94). Females had a 1.67 times higher chance of having GERD symptoms than males (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.15–2.41). Students who came from urban areas had a 33% reduced chance of having GERD symptoms than rural dwellers (AOR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48–0.94). Students who had a history of antipain use were 2.47 times more likely to have GERD symptoms than their counterparts (AOR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.65–3.69). Students who use soft drinks were 1.58 times more likely to have GERD symptoms than those who did not use a soft drink (AOR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.13–2.20) (Table 4).

Table 4 Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis for factors associated with Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms among university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021, (n = 791)
Full size table

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, and its associated factors among university students in the Amhara national regional state, Ethiopia. Accordingly, the prevalence of Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in this study was 32.1% (95% CI = 28.7–35.5%). This study finding is consistent with studies from Nigeria (32.8%) [12], Saudi Arabia (33.18%) [25], and India (30%) [9]. This study’s findings were lower than those of previous studies in Sri Lanka (52%) [7], and Saudi Arabia ( 52.6%) [8]. It is, however, higher than studies from Iran (19.3%), [34] and Saudi Arabia (25.9%) [42], Syria (16%) [36], India (14.4%) [10], Italy (26.2%) [11], Brazil (11.8%) [6], and Nigeria (26.34%) [13]. Lifestyle, socioeconomic, and demographic differences in the study population may have contributed to these disparities [4, 54,55,56].

Regarding associated factors, age, sex, residence, use of antipain, and consumption of soft drinks were significantly associated with GERD symptoms among university students. According to the finding of this study, the participants aged 20–25 years were more likely to have GERD symptoms than those under the age of 20 years old. This finding was consistent with prior findings in the literature [19, 26, 31]. Justification might be that students are under academic pressure, and lifestyle changes may have an impact on the student’s physical and mental health by causing psychological stress and it causes raising gastric acid secretion, decreasing gastric emptying, and enhancing the gastric mucosa’s sensitivity to acid, psychological stress can exacerbate the symptoms of GERD [17].

And also, students are more likely to participate in risky habits like chewing chat, cigarettes smoking, drinking alcohol, sleeping too little, and drinking soft drinks and coffee to relieve stress. Due to decreased lower esophageal sphincter tone, increased acid secretion, irritation of the esophageal mucosa, decreased gastroesophageal motility, and decreased production of bicarbonate-rich saliva, these activities may exacerbate the symptoms of GERD [57,58,59,60].

Another factor significantly associated with GERD symptoms is the sex of the respondents. Females had an increased chance of having GERD symptoms compared to males. This finding is consistent with other studies conducted elsewhere [7, 11, 24, 26,27,28,29,30]. The possible reason might be gender-related variation, which influences eating habits and lifestyle factors, as well as hormonal effects (such as progesterone) [54, 61]. Another possible explanation might be females are more prone to stressful conditions than males. Stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to produce cortisol and decreases the production of prostaglandins, increasing stomach acid production, and slowing gastric emptying [62].

Findings from this study revealed that respondents who came from urban were less likely to have GERD symptoms than rural dwellers. One possible reason is that urban dwellers are more aware of good living styles, dietary habits, and easier access to healthcare systems and health-related information than rural dwellers, all of which may reduce the risk of GERD symptoms.

The respondents who used analgesics were more likely to have GERD symptoms compared to those who did not. The finding of this study was consistent with many studies conducted elsewhere [20, 21, 28, 32, 35, 45, 47,48,49,50]. The possible reason might be analgesics, directly and indirectly, disrupts physiologic mucosal protection mechanisms in the digestive tract by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzymes. Besides, analgesics might reduce lower esophageal sphincter pressure, delay emptying of the stomach, and increase acid secretion [4, 50, 63, 64].

Respondents who use soft drinks were more likely to have GERD symptoms than their counterparts. The finding of this study was in line with other findings [8, 9, 18, 24, 25, 38, 39, 41,42,43]. The possible reason might be soft drinks contain caffeine, gaseous, carbohydrates (sweeteners), and acid [57], which can affect the upper digestive system by causing gastric distention due to the carbonation process, which increases acid reflux by decreasing lower esophageal sphincter pressure, increasing the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation then push stomach acid contents back to the esophagus, increases postprandial acid exposure of the esophagus. Moreover, it might be stimulated by extra gastric acid secretion and acid pocket formation increases gastric acid contents because soft drinks have taken during a meal and after the meal, which results in GERD symptoms [57, 65,66,67].

This study has limitations. Because the study was cross-sectional, it is difficult to demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships between independent and dependent variables. Because of the significant overlap between dyspepsia and GERD symptoms, dyspepsia cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, because only GERDQ was used for diagnosis, there are a significant number of false positives and false negatives.

Conclusion

Approximately one-third of university students suffer from gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Age, gender, residence, antipain use, and soft drink consumption were all significantly associated factors. To reduce disease burden, it is recommended to reduce modifiable risk factors such as antipain medication use and soft drink consumption.

Availability of materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GERD:

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

GERDQ:

Gastroesophageal reflux Disease Questionnaire

References

  1. Murphy T et al. Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease: An Update. WIMJ Open, 2015.2.

  2. Vakil N, et al. [The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global, evidence-based consensus paper]. Z Gastroenterol. 2007;45(11):1125–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunt R et al. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines: GERD Global Perspective on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2017. 51(6).

  4. Nirwan JS, et al. Global prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux Disease (GORD): systematic review with Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Serag HB, et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63(6):871–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexandre L, Cardoso AGAF, Lara GD, Sales, Adozina M, Souza Neta, Íkaro DC, Barreto, Leda MDF, Trindade. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and quality of life of health science undergraduate students. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2018;48:197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunasinghe D, et al. Prevalence, associated factors and medication for symptoms related to gastroesophageal reflux disease among 1114 private-tuition students of Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Elnemr GMHA, Abdullah Hassan Alghamdi SA, Alharthi FR, Masoodi. Ibrahim, the predictors of gastroesophageal reflux disease among University students: a cross-sectional study in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;73(1):5828–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arivan R, Deepanjali S. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease among undergraduate medical students from a southern indian medical school: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Karthik RC, Arumugam BSB, Sriram RM, Ezhilvanan M. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease among medical students in Chennai, South India. Indian J Forensic Community Med. 2017;4(3):199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martinucci I, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms among italian university students: epidemiology and dietary correlates using automatically recorded transactions. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Akinola MA, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and extraesophageal manifestations among undergraduate students in South West Nigeria. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nwokediuko S. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a Population-Based study. Gastroenterol Res. 2009;2(3):152–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Savarino E, et al. The natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comprehensive review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(2):1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Basharat S, et al. Association of Dietary Practices and Lifestyle modifications in gastroesophageal reflux disease in pakistani women. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci. 2020;64:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Damar Nagheer RI, Younger-Coleman N. Overview of the prevalence and Associated Risk, factors of Lifestyle Diseases in University students. Int J Clin Med. 2017;8:344–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghasem Bordbar N-sB. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): prevalence and association with Psychological Disorders among medical sciences students. Int J PharmTech Res. 2015;8:120–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wesam A, Nasif, A.S.E.-M.A. Mohamed Mahmoud Nour Eldein, Ahmed Saad Badri, Yahya Abdullah Alayyafi, Hassan Hussain Alfaqih, and Talal Mohamed Kerma, Socio-demographic and lifestyle differences between males and females as risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in Mecca City, Saudi Arabia. Asian J Epidemiol. 2020;13:4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gong Y, Yan QZY. Chaojing Han, and Yansong Zheng Association between Lifestyle and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire Scores: A Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Adults. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2019. Volume 2019.

  20. Sharma A, Sharma PK, Puri P. Prevalence and the risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in medical students. Med J Armed Forces India. 2018;74(3):250–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kariri AM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2020;12(1):e6626–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrew Young D, Mythri Anil Kumar MD, Prashanthi N, Thota. A practical approach. MD, FACG, GERD: CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE; 2020. p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Islami F, et al. Determinants of gastroesophageal reflux disease, including hookah smoking and opium use- a cross-sectional analysis of 50,000 individuals. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Alrashed A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease among Shaqra University students, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Awadalla NJ. Personal, academic and stress correlates of gastroesophageal reflux disease among college students in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2019;47:61–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar S, et al. Population-based study to assess prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a high altitude area. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011;30(3):135–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaha M, Alamgir PI, Masud MJ, Rahman MH. Prevalence and risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the North-Eastern part of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2012;38(GERD):108–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei FJ, Atshani SM, Chagharvand S, Souti F. The epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: the prevalence and the associated factors in a random sample of the general population in the Northern part of Iran. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2013;4(3):175–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li-Ju Hung P-IH, Chun-Yuh Yang E-Ming, Wang K-H, Lai. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a general population in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chowdhury SD, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease in southern India: a community-based study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38(1):77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang H, et al. A population-based study on prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma X-Q, et al. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, gastroesophageal reflux disease: a population-based study in Shanghai, China. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(4):317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sameer A, Al-Towairqi WJA, Aisha S, Almalki MM, Dabi RA, Althobaiti. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease among female medical students at Taif University, Saudi Arabia. World Family Medicine. 2020;18:77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mohammad H, Somi M, Farhang S, Kazem Mirinezhad MD, Emtis Jazayeri MD, Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam MS. MD, Solmaz Moayeri, Medical Student, Sanaz Yasrebinia, Prevalence and precipitating factors of Gastroesophageal reflux disease in a young population of Tabriz, Northwest of Iran.Saudi Med J2006.27.

  35. Alkhathami AM, et al. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease in Saudi Arabia. Gastroenterol Res. 2017;10(5):294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saadi TA, Turk AIT. Mahmoud Alkhatib, epidemiology and risk factors of uninvestigated dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and gastroesophageal reflux disease among students of Damascus University, Syria. J Epidemiol Global Health. 2017;6(4):285–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alsulobi AM, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease among the population of Arar City, Northern Saudi Arabia. Electron Physician. 2017;9(10):5499–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shahnai Basharata FBA. Syed Amir Gillanic, Mehak Zubaird, Azka Ahmad Chaughattae, Ashna Mahmoodf, Urva Mahmoodg, Ahsan SattarSheikh, Association of Dietary Practices and Lifestyle Modifications in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Pakistani Women. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS) 2020. 64: p. 43–53.

  39. Song JH, et al. Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and dietary factors in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17(1):54–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bor S, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Moscow. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(2):159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Eman Hassan Nadwa FSA, Rawan Rafi Alruwaili. Raghad Mwafiq Aldaghmi, Majed Hamed Alfallaj, gastroesophageal reflux disease among students of Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Developing Ctries. 2020;4(8):1144–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Atta MS, Zayed M, Alsulami M, Al-Maghrabi S, Kelantan A. Abdulhfeez, Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and associated risk factors among medical students, Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med. 2019;12:293–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jarosz M, Taraszewska A. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease: the role of diet. Przeglad gastroenterologiczny. 2014;9(5):297–301.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Joel E, Richter JHR. Presentation and Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology 2018. 154: p. 267–276.

  45. Mostaghni A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Qashqai migrating nomads, southern Iran. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(8):961–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Spantideas N, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in the greek general population: prevalence and risk factors. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2016;9:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Butt AK, Hashemy I. Risk factors and prescription patterns of gastroesophageal reflux disease: HEAL study in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(7):751–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nwokediuko SC, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in a typical african population: a symptom-based multicenter study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mahdi BM, Hazim HR. Effect of risk factors on grades of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Apollo Med. 2017;14:154–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Halawani H, Banoon S. Prevalence and determinants of gastroesophageal reflux Disease and the risk factors among adult patients attending Al-Iskan Primary Health Care Center in Makkah, 2020. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10535.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kenana Owaidah MA, Alquliti A, Naguib SArabiAAloufiE. The Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Its Impact on Quality of Life among Taibah University Students.International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2017. 8(9).

  52. JONES R, DENT OJJ, VAKIL N, HALLING– K, B. WERNERSSON, LIND T. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1030–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Norder Grusell E, et al. The diagnostic value of GerdQ in subjects with atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(10–11):1165–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kim SY, et al. Gender-specific differences in prevalence and risk factors for Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(21):e158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Eusebi LH, et al. Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2018;67(3):430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Karimian M, et al. Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Johnson T, et al. Systematic review: the effects of carbonated beverages on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31(6):607–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen S-h, Wang J-w, Li Y-m. Is alcohol consumption associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010;11(6):423–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ness-Jensen E, Lagergren J. Tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;31(5):501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kubo A, et al. Dietary guideline adherence for gastroesophageal reflux disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14(1):144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kahrilas PJ. Clinical practice. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(16):1700–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Fass TYaR. Reflux Hypersensitivity: A New Functional Esophageal Disorder. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017. 23(4).

  63. Clarrett DM, Hachem C. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Missouri medicine, 2018. 115(3): p. 214–218.

  64. Mungan ZPŞ. Which drugs are risk factors for the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease? Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28(Suppl 1):S38–s43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nilgün Seremet NK. Gülsah Kaner & Kübra Tel Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms and Nutritional Preferences. Studies on Ethno-Medicine, 2015. 9(3): p. 305–318.

  66. Fiorentino E. The consumption of snacks and soft drinks between meals may contribute to the development and the persistence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Hypotheses. 2019;125:84–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Eslami O, et al. Dietary habits and obesity indices in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17(1):132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants, data collectors, supervisors, and colleagues.

Funding

For this research paper, we did not receive any grant from any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

    Mekonnen Belete

  2. Department of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Winta Tesfaye, Yonas Akalu & Yigizie Yeshaw

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Yigizie Yeshaw

  4. Department of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

    Adugnaw Adane

Authors
  1. Mekonnen Belete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Winta Tesfaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yonas Akalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adugnaw Adane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yigizie Yeshaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mekonen Belete participated in conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, visualization, writing the original draft, editing, and reviewing the paper.Winta Tesfaye contributed to conceptualization, data curation, investigation, project administration, software, supervision, visualizing and writing the original draft, and editing and reviewing the draft. Adugnaw Adane participated in data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, review & editing of the paper.Yonas Akalu contributed to the following works investigation, software, supervision, visualization review, and editing of the paper.Yigizie Yeshaw partaken in conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, writing – original draft, and review & editing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mekonnen Belete.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted following Helsinki Declaration. The Ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional review board of the School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar with approval number 435/2021. Each study participant was informed about the objective and purpose of the study which contributes necessary information for policymakers and concerned bodies. Written informed consent was obtained from each selected study participant before we asked them. Participants were informed that they have the right to continue or withdraw from the study at any time. The confidentiality of information provided by study participants was protected by making the data collection procedure anonymous and all information of the study subject would be kept confidential.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belete, M., Tesfaye, W., Akalu, Y. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and associated factors among university students in Amhara region, Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02758-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02758-8

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us