Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comorbid psychiatric disorders and long-term survival after liver transplantation in transplant facilities with a psychiatric consultation-liaison team: a multicenter retrospective study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 106 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Comorbid psychiatric disorders negatively affect the survival rate of patients with some physical disorders. In liver transplant recipients, various psychiatric disorders have been identified as worsening prognosis. However, little is known about how the presence of any comorbid (overall) disorders affect the survival rate of transplant recipients. In this study, we examined the effect of overall comorbid psychiatric disorders on survival rate in liver transplant recipients.

Methods

A total of 1006 recipients who underwent liver transplantation between September 1997 and July 2017 across eight transplant facilities with a psychiatric consultation-liaison team were identified consecutively. Recipients were categorized into those with comorbid psychiatric disorders and those without comorbid psychiatric disorders. In the comorbid psychiatric disorder group, psychiatric disorder diagnosis and time of diagnosis were investigated retrospectively.

Results

Of the 1006 recipients, 294 (29.2%) had comorbid psychiatric disorders. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in the 1006 recipients were insomnia (N = 107, 10.6%), delirium (N = 103, 10.2%), major depressive disorder (N = 41, 4.1%), adjustment disorder (N = 19, 1.9%), anxiety disorder (N = 17, 1.7%), intellectual disability (N = 11, 1.1%), autism spectrum disorder (N = 7, 0.7%), somatic symptom disorder (N = 4, 0.4%) schizophrenia (N = 4, 0.4%), substance use disorder (N = 24, 2.4%) and personality disorder (N = 2, 0.2%). The most common time of psychiatric disorder diagnosis was within the first 3 months after liver transplantation (51.6%). The final mortality in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnosis during the five periods (pretransplant, transplant to 3 months, months to 1 year, 1 to 3 years, and over 3 years posttransplant) was 16.2%, 18.8%, 39.1%, 28.6%, and 16.2% respectively, and there were no significant differences between the five periods (χ2 = 8.05, df = 4, p = 0.09). Overall comorbid psychiatric disorders were significantly associated with shorter survival time (log-rank test: p = 0.01, hazard ratio: 1.59 [95% confidence interval: 1.14–2.21], survival rate at the endpoint [%]: 62.0 vs. 83.3). However, after adjusting for confounding variables using Cox proportional hazards regression, there was no significant effect of overall comorbid psychiatric disorders on prognosis.

Conclusion

Comorbid psychiatric disorders did not affect the survival rate of liver transplant recipients in this study.

Peer Review reports

Background

Comorbid psychiatric disorders negatively affect the prognosis of several physical disorders, including coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes [1]. Many studies have examined the effect of comorbid psychiatric disorders on transplant recipients. These studies collectively demonstrate that approximately 40% of transplant recipients have psychiatric disorders pretransplantation [2], and that approximately 60% of organ recipients develop psychiatric disorders within several years posttransplantation [3]. A comprehensive meta-analysis of comorbid psychiatric disorders in organ transplant recipients [3] demonstrated that recipients who present with depression prior to and immediately after transplantation have 1.65 times the risk of postoperative mortality compared with those without comorbid psychiatric disorders. Because of such findings, comorbid psychiatric disorders are carefully taken into consideration as possible contraindications to organ transplantation. For example, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines [4] recommend that psychiatric disorders that are poorly controlled by appropriate pharmacotherapy should be considered relative contraindications to transplantation, and the clinical guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology [5] indicate that severe psychiatric disorders are relative contraindications to transplantation.

Liver transplant recipients often have comorbid psychiatric disorders that are insufficiently severe to meet the above criteria for contraindications. Depression is the most examined psychiatric disorder, and has been reported to be comorbid in 13%–60% of liver transplant recipients [6,7,8,9]. Furthermore, pretransplant depression reportedly reduces the quality of life and survival of transplant recipients [8]. Studies [10, 11] have also demonstrated that 10%–27% of liver transplant recipients have delirium, and that these recipients are at higher risk of prolonged hospital length of stay and mortality [12, 13]. Similarly, 5%–6% of liver transplant recipients, particularly adolescent recipients, have posttraumatic stress disorder [14, 15]. Recipients with various types of psychiatric disorders are treated by psychiatrists who provide multidisciplinary care in the field of transplant medicine. Studies [7, 16] have demonstrated that psychiatric intervention improves long-term survival in liver transplant recipients.

Clinicians often assume that psychiatric disorders may lead to low adherence and consequently poor long-term survival rate in transplant recipients. However, no studies have examined the presence of any psychiatric (overall) disorder in liver transplant recipients. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders is high, they are often comorbid, and they affect prognosis in varying degrees. Prevention of any psychiatric disorder would be important to improve prognosis. From this perspective, the categorization of any psychiatric (overall) disorder is of certain significance.

In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders in liver transplant recipients, and whether both overall and specific psychiatric comorbidities affected their long-term survival.

Methods

Patients and study design

The Organ Failure/Transplantation Committee of the Japanese Society of General Hospital Psychiatry, which consists of psychiatrists who specialize in transplant medicine, as well as psychologists, recipient coordinators, and nurses, selected eight institutions (Hokkaido University, Jichi University, Keio University, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Nagoya University, Kyoto University, Okayama University, and Kyushu University). These eight facilities were selected because of having a number of liver transplants and proven consultation-liaison psychiatry programs that include transplant surgeons and psychiatrists. Activities of the liaison team at each facility have been gradually standardized since 2009 due to the development of the Organ Failure/Transplantation Committee of the Japanese Society of General Hospital Psychiatry.

During the pretransplantation period, the transplant team consulted with the expert psychiatrists and psychologists belonging to the transplant psychiatry team regarding any recipient candidates with a history of psychiatric disorders or psychiatric signs and symptoms. As per the transplantation criteria in Japan, recipient candidates with liver cirrhosis owing to alcohol use disorders were disqualified from transplant listing if they had not been abstinent for the last 6 months (on February 20, 2014, this changed to 18 months), indicating that they were mentally stable before liver transplantation.

During the posttransplantation period, the transplant team consulted with the expert psychiatrists and psychologists belonging to the transplant psychiatry team if they noticed any signs or symptoms of psychiatric disorders in recipients. Following requests from the transplant team during each period, expert psychiatrists and psychologists at each institution evaluated all patients for comorbid psychiatric disorders using semi-structured interviews based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV [17], DSM-IV-TR [18], and DSM-5 [19].

A total of 1006 recipients, who underwent liver transplantation between September 1997 and July 2017 across the institutions, were included consecutively in this study. For this study, diagnoses identified by diagnostic criteria prior to DSM-5 were changed to those corresponding approximately to diagnoses by DSM-5. After the data collection period, data were extracted by experienced psychiatrists and psychologists who were part of the transplant psychiatry team of each institution. Electronic patient records were used to collect clinical data for all transplant recipients (age at transplant, sex, marital status, education, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)/pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD), etiology of liver disease, living donor liver transplantation/deceased donor liver transplantation, relationship of recipient to donor, hospitalization days from transplantation to leaving the hospital, death). Data on psychiatric comorbidity, including time of diagnosis, were also collected, and recipients were categorized into those with comorbid psychiatric disorders (comorbid psychiatric disorders group: CP group) and those without comorbid psychiatric disorders (non-comorbid psychiatric disorders group: N-CP group). All the data were aggregated at Nagoya University before undergoing statistical processing.

First, demographics, liver disease factors, and transplant factors were compared between the CP and N-CP groups. Second, based on a previous study of comorbid psychiatric disorders [20], recipients in the CP group were further categorized according to the time of psychiatric disorder diagnosis (pretransplant, transplant to 3 months, 3 months to 1 year, 1 to 3 years, and over 3 years posttransplant) to compare the mortality between these subgroups. Third, the survival rate was compared between the CP and N-CP groups. According to one definition of delirium [19], there is evidence that such disturbances are a “direct physiological consequence” of another medical condition, substance intoxication or withdrawal (i.e., caused by drug abuse or medication), toxins, or various combinations of causes. As the substantial physical effect of the transplant procedure may have led to delirium during the first week after liver transplantation [12, 21], the same analyses were also performed excluding patients with postoperative delirium from the CP group to control for the acute, direct physiological effect of liver transplantation. And the same analysis was then performed excluding all delirium patients.

Furthermore, the survival rate in each comorbid psychiatric disorder group was compared with that of the N-CP group as a comparison with previous findings [8, 13]. Survival was analyzed separately for participants aged 12 years or older (using MELD) and in those aged less than 12 years (using PELD), because the nature and distribution of psychiatric comorbidity differs between these two groups. Finally, psychiatric disorders were classified into major groups (schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, mild intellectual disability, and autism spectrum disorder), minor groups (insomnia, adjustment disorder, and anxiety disorder), and other groups (substance use disorder and personality disorder), and mortality rates at 1 and 3 years after transplant were tested for comparison.

Hospitalization day data were not available for 18 of the 1006 recipients. Additionally, MELD data were not available for 161 of the 669 recipients aged 12 years or older. These participants were therefore excluded from analyses that required these data.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and EZR [22]. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-tests and categorical variables using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Residual analysis was performed when the cross-tabulation table was greater than 2 × 2. For comparisons of patient characteristics, the significance level was set at 0.05 and not adjusted for multiple testing because of the exploratory nature of the study.

Time to death was estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves. Comparisons of the two survival curves were performed using the log-rank test. Data for groups with/without overall psychiatric disorder or each psychiatric disorder, with a power of approximately 0.8 or higher under a type 1 error of 0.01 or 0.025 where appropriate, were subjected to Kaplan–Meier analysis using the log-rank test.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard rates (HR) for mortality, adjusting for background factors. The significance level was adjusted for multiple comparisons as appropriate.

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of liver transplant recipients. The CP group contained more participants who were older, married, had more years of education, higher MELD score, and longer hospitalization than the N-CP group. Table 2 shows diagnosis and time of diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in the CP group. Multiple comorbidities at the same time were recorded separately. Only the first episode was recorded in patients having relapses of a single disorder. Every diagnosis was recorded in patients having more than one disorder over time. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in the 1006 recipients were insomnia (N = 107, 10.6%), delirium (N = 103, 10.2%), major depressive disorder (N = 41, 4.1%), adjustment disorder (N = 19, 1.9%), anxiety disorder (N = 17, 1.7%), intellectual disability (N = 11, 1.1%), autism spectrum disorder (N = 7, 0.7%), somatic symptom disorder (N = 4, 0.4%) schizophrenia (N = 4, 0.4%), substance use disorder (N = 24, 2.4%) and personality disorder (N = 2, 0.2%).

Table 1 Patient characteristics for the cohort and by psychiatric disorder status
Full size table
Table 2 Time of diagnosis of psychiatric disorders
Full size table

The most common time of psychiatric disorder diagnosis was within the first 3 months after liver transplantation (51.6%). The final mortality in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnosis during the five periods (pretransplant: A, transplant to 3 months: B, months to 1 year: C, 1 to 3 years: D, and over 3 years posttransplant: E) was 16.2%, 18.8%, 39.1%, 28.6%, and 16.2% respectively, and there were no significant differences between the five periods (χ2 = 8.05, df = 4, p = 0.09). Additional cox proportional hazards regression revealed that the period of first onset psychiatric disorder did not affect survival outcome (A: p = 0.19, HR: 2.37[95% CI: 0.66–8.56], B: p = 0.06, 3.22[0.94–11.00], C: p = 0.11, 3.43[0.77–15.37], D: p = 0.72, 1.52[0.16–14.71], E: reference).

Among the groups of major (schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, mild intellectual disability, and autism spectrum disorder), minor (insomnia, adjustment disorder, and anxiety disorder), and other psychiatric disorders (substance use disorder and personality disorder), mortality rates at 1 and 3 years after transplant were not significantly different, P = 0.8.

Survival outcome

Over the length of the study follow-up, 149 (14.8%) recipients died and 857 (85.2%) were alive at the end of the study. Comorbid psychiatric disorders were significantly associated with shorter survival time (log-rank test: p = 0.01, HR: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14–2.21). This result seems to be in agreement with the results of previous studies and to support transplant guidelines for patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders.

The same analyses performed excluding patients with delirium during the first week after transplantation also showed significant association between comorbid psychiatric disorders and shorter survival time. However, the same analysis excluding all patients with delirium did not show a significant association between comorbid psychiatric disorders and shorter survival. Delirium and major depressive disorder were significantly associated with shorter survival time, but insomnia was not (Table 3).

Table 3 The survival rate for each comorbid psychiatric disorder
Full size table

There were differences in background characteristics between the CP group and the N-CP group (Table 1). Cox proportional hazards regression was performed with data for all transplant recipients to adjust for these differences (Table 4). Age, hospitalization days, and MELD score were the main factors that showed significant differences between the CP and N-CP groups. In addition, since this study analyzed psychiatric disorders of various onset times together, a factor of time of diagnosis (time from onset to transplantation) was added. In the case of multiple psychiatric disorders, the date of diagnosis of the first psychiatric disorder was selected. In the case of preoperative psychiatric disorder, since the date of onset of psychiatric disorder was unknown, the date of onset of psychiatric disorder was tentatively set to one month before transplantation, when the preoperative evaluation was performed. As MELD score only applied to recipients aged 12 years or older, age and hospitalization days were first entered as covariates for all transplant recipients. The results showed that age and hospitalization days had a significant effect on survival (age: p < 0.001, HR: 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02–1.04]; hospitalization days: p < 0.001, HR: 1.004 [95% CI: 1.003–1.006]), whereas comorbid psychiatric disorders had no significant effect (comorbid psychiatric disorders: p = 0.75, HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.66–1.35]). The same analyses performed for all transplant recipients excluding those with delirium during the first week after transplantation also showed no significant association between comorbid psychiatric disorders and shorter survival time. Furthermore, the same analysis was performed for each comorbid psychiatric disorder. The results showed that delirium(Overall), insomnia, and major depressive disorder did not significantly affect survival.

Table 4 Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting age and hospitalization days
Full size table

Similarly, survival was analyzed separately in participants aged 12 years or older (using MELD) and in those aged less than 12 years (using PELD).

In participants aged 12 years or older, there was sufficient power for an analysis of comorbid psychiatric disorders and comorbid psychiatric disorders excluding delirium during the first week after transplantation. In participants aged less than 12 years, there was insufficient power for an analysis of each diagnostic group; therefore, additional analyses after separating by age were not performed.

Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that comorbid psychiatric disorders (including/excluding delirium during the first week after transplantation) in participants aged 12 years or older were not significantly associated with survival time (Table 5). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that age and hospitalization days had a significant effect on survival, whereas comorbid psychiatric disorders (including/excluding delirium during the first week after transplantation) and MELD had no significant effect (Table 6). Delirium can affect the prognosis of liver transplantation recipients, resulting in longer hospitalization. Including both delirium and hospitalization day in covariates might be problematic in terms of multicollinearity. Therefore, Cox proportional hazards regression was performed excluding the covariate of hospitalization days. As a result, the survival rate was not affected by the comorbidity of psychiatric disorders(data not shown). Without adjusting for background factors, delirium, and major depressive disorder appeared to be significantly associated with shorter survival in this study. However, further Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with sufficient power showed no association, indicating no impact of delirium and major depressive disorder on survival.

Table 5 The survival rate for each comorbid psychiatric disorder (aged 12 years and older)
Full size table
Table 6 Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting age, hospitalization days and MELD
Full size table

In conclusion, comorbid psychiatric disorders had no significant effect on survival of liver transplant recipients.

Discussion

At first glance, the results of this study may provide a picture of the relationship between comorbid psychiatric disorders and transplant outcomes as envisioned by transplant physicians in light of previous studies and transplant guidelines for patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders. However, after adjusting for background factors, this study showed that the presence of overall as well as specific comorbid psychiatric disorders in liver transplant recipients did not affect their long-term survival. Similar results were obtained in the analyses for selected participants aged 12 years or older.

Previous studies have examined the effect of depression and delirium on the survival rate of liver transplant recipients. A prospective cohort study demonstrated that pretransplant depression was associated with poor long-term survival [7, 8], and there is also evidence that delirium is associated with mortality [13].

In considering why psychiatric disorders affect survival, we can assume that recipients with comorbid psychiatric disorder have low adherence and subsequent low long-term survival rate. Previous studies [22, 23] have demonstrated low adherence to medical treatments in recipients with psychiatric disorders. It is likely that, during a long-term follow-up, the involvement of psychiatrists in addressing comorbid psychiatric disorders becomes less frequent, leading to poor adherence and poor long-term survival. However, the comorbidity of overall psychiatric disorder, and that of each of the psychiatric disorders, had no effect on the long-term survival of transplant recipients in the present study. In previous studies, the survival rate of recipients with depression in the first posttransplant year improved when they were treated appropriately [9, 16]. It is possible that adequate long-term treatment of comorbid psychiatric disorders (perhaps by Japan’s universal health insurance program) suppressed their negative effect on the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients in this study.

In terms of methodology, almost all previous studies have compared survival rates in groups with or without one specific comorbid psychiatric disorder. In such studies, other psychiatric disorders are more likely to be present in the non-CP group. In the present study, comprehensive psychiatric disorders were diagnosed by expert psychiatrists and psychologists using standard diagnostic criteria. One previously reported large-scale study with more participants than this study lacked sufficient diagnostic accuracy [8].

Although some previous studies on depression have used the Cox proportional hazards survival approach with log-rank testing of Kaplan–Meier curves, the sample sizes were small [6, 7, 16, 24] and power analysis was not performed [6, 16, 24]. In addition, one study [9] did not include any physical indices; only age and sex were adjusted for. Moreover, for the previous studies on delirium, the sample size was small and power analysis was not performed [10, 12, 13, 21]. In the present study, appropriate power analysis was performed and background factors were investigated in detail. The use of this methodology means that the present findings may be more reliable than those of previous studies.

The most common time of diagnosis of psychiatric disorders was within the first 3 months of liver transplantation; 51.6% of psychiatric comorbidities were diagnosed in this period. This rate is higher than that reported in a previous study (20.7%) [20] in which the most common time of psychiatric disorder diagnosis was also within the first 3 months of liver transplantation. Postoperative delirium and sleep disorders likely contributed to the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders during this time period.

It is possible that the present study identified more psychiatric disorders because of the consultation-liaison psychiatry programs of the hospitals in this study; collaboration with psychiatric teams could have improved ability of transplant teams to notice psychiatric disorders. It is important to carefully monitor the development of psychiatric disorders within the first 3 months of transplantation.

In this study, we identified various comorbid psychiatric disorders in liver transplant recipients. The prevalence of major depressive disorder (4.1%) was lower than that reported in previous studies [6, 7, 24]. Anxiety disorder was previously reported in 19% of liver transplant recipients prior to surgery and 33% of transplant recipients during pretransplant and posttransplant periods [25]. In contrast, we found that only 1.7% of recipients had anxiety. The prevalence of insomnia in this study was 10.6%, whereas a previous study [26] demonstrated a higher prevalence of insomnia (40.3%). These disorders may have been overdiagnosed in some of the above-mentioned previous studies because they used questionnaires instead of standardized psychiatric diagnostic criteria. As delirium can be objectively diagnosed from recipients’ behavior, the prevalence of delirium in this study (10.2%) is consistent with that reported in previous studies (10%–27%) [10, 11].

The present study has some limitations. First, psychiatric evaluation by expert psychiatrists and psychologists was not schedule-based; it was performed in response to requests from the transplant team when they became aware of signs or symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Minor such signs may not have been detected by transplant teams consisting of non-psychiatrists and non-psychologists, though they detected more psychiatric disorders within the first 3 months of liver transplantation than in a previous study. There is a possibility that subjects with comorbid psychiatric disorders might have been included in the N-CP group.

Second, we did not investigate how many recipients with comorbid psychiatric disorders received psychiatric treatment, what type of psychiatric treatment they received, and their adherence to psychotropic medication. The major death causes underlying psychiatric disorders, such as suicide, non-medical adherence to immunosuppressants, poor personal care, accident-prone behavior were also not investigated. This lack of clinical data may have confounded the results.

Third, participants with transient psychiatric disorders and those with chronic or recurrent psychiatric disorders were not differentiated; data for both were included in the same analysis. In addition, data for participants with posttransplant early onset and those with late onset psychiatric disorders were included in the same analysis. It is likely that there was substantial variation among participants in the duration of clinically evident psychiatric disorders. Though this study revealed that the period of first onset psychiatric disorder did not affect survival outcome, it is difficult to get rid of the above issues completely. Most previous studies seem to have the same limitation.

Fourth, medical technology for liver transplantation has been improving daily over the 20 years between 1997 and 2017. The effects of such progress on the present data may have affected the findings.

Fifth, possible selection bias would be considered that transplant candidates with comorbid severe psychiatric disorders were more likely to be excluded and those with comorbid mild psychiatric disorders were selected.

Conclusion

Comorbid psychiatric disorders did not affect survival of liver transplant recipients in the limited facilities having a number of liver transplants and proven liver transplant liaison by psychiatric teams in Japan. Further studies with a larger number of participants and well-designed protocols are needed to confirm the findings obtained in this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available only upon request to the Corresponding Author, as the data contain potentially identifying or sensitive psychosocial information(History of psychiatric disorders, comorbid psychiatric disorders and psychiatric state and so on). All the data supporting our findings are contained within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CP:

Comorbid psychiatric disorders

DSM:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

HR:

Hazard rate

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver disease

N-CP:

Non-comorbid psychiatric disorders

PELD:

Pediatric end-stage liver disease

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S, Maj M, Maselko J, Phillips MR, et al. No health without mental health. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):859–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Faeder S, Moschenross D, Rosenberger E, Dew MA, DiMartini A. Psychiatric aspects of organ transplantation and donation. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(5):357–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dew MA, Rosenberger EM, Myaskovsky L, DiMartini AF, DeVito Dabbs AJ, Posluszny DM, et al. Depression and anxiety as risk factors for morbidity and mortality after organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2015;100(5):988–1003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Murray KF, Carithers RL,  Aasld Jr. AASLD practice guidelines: Evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1407–32.

  5. J D, J. OG. Indications for referral and assessment in adult liver transplantation: a clinical guideline. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 1999;45(Suppl 6):VI1–22.

  6. Corruble E, Barry C, Varescon I, Falissard B, Castaing D, Samuel D. Depressive symptoms predict long-term mortality after liver transplantation. J Psychosom Res. 2011;71(1):32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogal SS, Landsittel D, Surman O, Chung RT, Rutherford A. Pretransplant depression, antidepressant use, and outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011;17(3):251–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogal SS, Mankaney G, Udawatta V, Chinman M, Good CB, Zickmund S, et al. Pre-transplant depression is associated with length of hospitalization, discharge disposition, and survival after liver transplantation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0165517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Meller W, Welle N, Sutley K, Thurber S. Depression and liver transplant survival. Psychosomatics. 2017;58(1):64–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lescot T, Karvellas CJ, Chaudhury P, Tchervenkov J, Paraskevas S, Barkun J, et al. Postoperative delirium in the intensive care unit predicts worse outcomes in liver transplant recipients. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(4):207–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiu NM, Chen CL, Cheng AT. Psychiatric consultation for post-liver-transplantation patients. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;63(4):471–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhattacharya B, Maung A, Barre K, Maerz L, Rodriguez-Davalos MI, Schilsky M, et al. Postoperative delirium is associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stays after liver transplantation. J Surg Res. 2017;207:223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee H, Oh SY, Yu JH, Kim J, Yoon S, Ryu HG. Risk factors of postoperative delirium in the intensive care unit after liver transplantation. World J Surg. 2018;42(9):2992–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Telles-Correia D, Barbosa A, Mega I, Mateus E, Monteiro E. When does quality of life improve after liver transplantation? A longitudinal prospective study. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(3):904–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paslakis G, Beckmann M, Beckebaum S, Klein C, Graf J, Erim Y. Posttraumatic stress disorder, quality of life, and the subjective experience in liver transplant recipients. Prog Transplant. 2018;28(1):70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rogal SS, Dew MA, Fontes P, DiMartini AF. Early treatment of depressive symptoms and long-term survival after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(4):928–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Association. AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM -IV). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 1994.

  18. Association. AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM -IV-TR). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2000.

  19. Association. AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM -5). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2013.

  20. Fukunishi I, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kawarasaki H, Surman OS. Psychiatric disorders before and after living-related transplantation. Psychosomatics. 2001;42(4):337–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beckmann S, Schubert M, Burkhalter H, Dutkowski P, De Geest S. Postoperative delirium after liver transplantation is associated with increased length of stay and lower survival in a prospective cohort. Prog Transplant. 2017;27(1):23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keith SJ, Kane JM. Partial compliance and patient consequences in schizophrenia: our patients can do better. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(11):1308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cantrell CR, Eaddy MT, Shah MB, Regan TS, Sokol MC. Methods for evaluating patient adherence to antidepressant therapy: a real-world comparison of adherence and economic outcomes. Med Care. 2006;44(4):300–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DiMartini A, Dew MA, Chaiffetz D, Fitzgerald MG, Devera ME, Fontes P. Early trajectories of depressive symptoms after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease predicts long-term survival. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(6):1287–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pelgur H, Atak N, Kose K. Anxiety and depression levels of patients undergoing liver transplantation and their need for training. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(5):1743–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu X, Ming Y, Liu J, Liu L, Cheng K, Mao P. Sleep Quality and psychosocial factors in liver transplant recipients at an outpatient follow-up clinic in China. Ann Transplant. 2020;25:e920984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Diane Williams, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan

    Hiroyuki Kimura, Shinichi Kishi & Norio Ozaki

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita14, Nishi5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan

    Hisashi Narita & Teruaki Tanaka

  3. Department of Psychiatry, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, 1-6-3-40, Hiragishi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo, 062-0931, Japan

    Teruaki Tanaka

  4. Department of Psychiatry, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

    Tsuyoshi Okada

  5. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University Graduate School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

    Daisuke Fujisawa

  6. Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Naoko Sugita & Shun’ichi Noma

  7. Okayama University Hospital Gender Center, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan

    Yosuke Matsumoto

  8. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Ayako Ohashi & Hiroshi Mitsuyasu

  9. Department of Psychiatry, Tanushimaru Central Hospital, 892 Masuoda, Tanushimaru, Kurume, Fukuoka, 839-1213, Japan

    Hiroshi Mitsuyasu

  10. Kariya Yoshida Mental Clinic, 2F, FBterrace Bldg, 2-40 Aioi-Cho, Kariya-Shi, Aichi, 448-0027, Japan

    Keizo Yoshida

  11. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan

    Hiroaki Kawasaki

  12. Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Women’s Medical University School of Medicine, 8-1 Kawada-Cho, Shinjyuku-Ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan

    Katsuji Nishimura

  13. Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan

    Yasuhiro Ogura

  14. Institute for Glyco-Core Research (iGCORE), Nagoya University, Furo-Cho, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan

    Norio Ozaki

Authors
  1. Hiroyuki Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shinichi Kishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hisashi Narita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teruaki Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tsuyoshi Okada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daisuke Fujisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Naoko Sugita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shun’ichi Noma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yosuke Matsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ayako Ohashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hiroshi Mitsuyasu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Keizo Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hiroaki Kawasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Katsuji Nishimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yasuhiro Ogura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Norio Ozaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.Y.K. participated in designing the research, performed data collection, performed data analysis, and wrote the article. S.K. participated in data collection and assisted with data analysis. H.N., T.T., T.O., D.F., N.S., S.N., Y.M., A.O., and H.M. participated in data collection. K.Y. assisted with data analysis and contributed to writing the article. H.A.K., K.N., Y.O., and N.O. participated in designing the research. All authors reviewed manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Kimura.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine in which requirement for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study (approval number: 2015–0029).

Consent for publication

We obtained the consent from for publication from all participants. We can present these consent form if editors request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kimura, H., Kishi, S., Narita, H. et al. Comorbid psychiatric disorders and long-term survival after liver transplantation in transplant facilities with a psychiatric consultation-liaison team: a multicenter retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02735-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02735-1

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us