Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Impact of comorbidities on hospital mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis: a population-based study of 110,021 patients

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 81 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The impact of pre-existing comorbidities on acute pancreatitis (AP) mortality is not clearly defined. Our study aims to determine the trend in AP hospital mortality and the role of comorbidities as a predictor of hospital mortality.

Methods

We analyzed patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with AP diagnosis between 2016 and 2019. The data have been extracted from the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database of the Spanish Ministry of Health. We performed a univariate and multivariable analysis of the association of age, sex, and comorbidities with hospital mortality in patients with AP. The role of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices as predictors of mortality was evaluated.

Results

A total of 110,021 patients diagnosed with AP were hospitalized during the analyzed period. Hospital mortality was 3.8%, with a progressive decrease observed in the years evaluated. In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 years (OR: 4.11, p < 0.001), heart disease (OR: 1.73, p < 0.001), renal disease (OR: 1.99, p < 0.001), moderate-severe liver disease (OR: 2.86, p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 1.43, p < 0.001), and cerebrovascular disease (OR: 1.63, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for mortality. The Charlson > 1.5 (OR: 2.03, p < 0.001) and Elixhauser > 1.5 (OR: 2.71, p < 0.001) comorbidity indices were also independently associated with mortality, and ROC curve analysis showed that they are useful for predicting hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Advanced age, heart disease, renal disease, moderate-severe liver disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease before admission were independently associated with hospital mortality. The Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices are useful for predicting hospital mortality in AP patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a prevalent acute inflammatory disease that affects the pancreas, with an increased incidence in recent years [1, 2]. Most cases are mild with a self-limited course [3]. However, patients with severe acute pancreatitis have a high mortality rate (20–50%) [4,5,6]. For this reason, many efforts have been made to find predictors of severity and mortality in patients with AP [7,8,9,10,11] to identify patients who need admission to an intensive care unit or specific treatment.

In clinical practice, systems such as the Ranson score, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, the Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI), the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), and various biochemical markers are used to predict severe AP and mortality [3, 12,13,14,15,16]. However, hospital mortality in AP could also be related to intrinsic patient characteristics, such as individual comorbidities. Most classic scores do not consider comorbidities before admission, except for APACHE II, but are restricted to severe chronic diseases.

According to some previous studies, patients with certain comorbidities, such as obesity [17], hypertriglyceridemia [18], chronic renal failure [19], diabetes [20, 21], and systemic lupus erythematosus [22], are associated with a higher risk of AP severity and mortality. However, few studies currently evaluate the impact of comorbidities on AP severity and mortality.

Our study aimed to determine the relevance of comorbidities and their indexes (Charlson and Elixhauser) as predictors of hospital mortality in patients with AP.

Methods

Study design

We carried out a retrospective observational study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge (Registro de Actividad de Atención Especializada-Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, “RAE-CMBD”). The RAE-CMBD collects all the administrative data from hospitals (public and private) in the country [23].

The information collected in this database comes from hospital discharge reports made by the physicians in charge of the patient. This information and record of coded diagnoses are automatically collected by the computer software of each center or by technical-administrative staff.

Study population

The study population includes patients diagnosed with AP and admitted to the Spanish National Health System hospitals from 2016 to 2019. Since 2016, the RAE-CMDB has collected 20 diagnoses and 20 procedures from each patient based on the International Classification of Diseases Version 10 (ICD-10).

The inclusion criteria were: Patients with a primary or first registered secondary diagnosis of AP.

The exclusion criteria were: 1) Patients under 18 years of age, 2) Patients with a diagnosis primary or first registered secondary of pancreatic neoplasm, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cyst, pancreatic pseudocyst, extrahepatic bile duct neoplasm, and complications of the transplanted pancreas. We excluded the population under 18 years of age because the incidence of AP is lower in the pediatric population [24], and the etiologies distribution differs from that of adults [25].

Variables analyzed

The variables included are demographic variables such as age and sex, and AP etiology. We used the ICD-10 diagnostic code from each patient to identify the etiology of AP, which includes six categories: biliary, alcohol, idiopathic, drug-related, other, and unspecified. Our clinical-administrative database does not have data on diagnostic tests such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging that allow the identification of the etiology in patients with a diagnosis of "unspecified pancreatitis. In addition, we did not have data after hospital discharge that could expand the information on the etiology. Other variables assessed were clinical variables on diagnoses and procedures.

Comorbidity assessment

Comorbidities were identified from the ICD-10 diagnosis codes of each patient. We have used the POA indicator (Present on registration) to identify comorbidities and differentiate them from diagnoses produced during hospital admission that could be secondary complications of AP. The ICD-10 codes used to identify specific comorbidities are described in the supplementary material (Additional file 1).

Calculation of comorbidities indexes

We assessed comorbidity by calculating the Charlson [26] and Elixhauser [27] comorbidity indices. These two indices are used in medical practice to predict mortality. ICD-10 diagnosis codes described by Quan et al. [28] were applied to identify specific comorbidities from the Charlson and Elixhauser indices.

The Charlson index assigns weights for 17 specific diseases, and its value was calculated by adding the weights of each condition as described by Charlson et al. [26]. The Elixhauser index assigns weights for 30 specific diseases, and its value was calculated using the algorithm described by Walraven et al. [29].

Outcomes

Outcomes analyzed included pancreatic necrosis length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), length of ICU stay, and hospital mortality. Since 2018, the definition of pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic necrosis infection has been included in the ICD-10 diagnosis code for AP: AP without necrosis or infection (K85. × 0), AP with uninfected necrosis (K85. × 1) and AP with infected necrosis (K85. × 2). In addition, we did not have information on the percentage extension of pancreatic necrosis. Therefore, the data on pancreatic necrosis were only used for the descriptive analysis of the evolution of AP in the period analyzed.

Statistical analysis

We used the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and the Linear-by-Linear association test for categorical variables to analyze the characteristics and results of patients with AP during the years evaluated (2016–2019).

The analysis of risk factors for hospital mortality was performed by applying the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Student's t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables.

Univariate and multivariable analysis of the factors associated with hospital mortality was performed using logistic regression. We performed three multivariable analyses of significant variables in the univariate analysis. The first analysis included: age ≥ 65 years, sex, and specific comorbidities. In the second analysis, the Charlson comorbidity index replaced the specific comorbidities. The third analysis replaced specific comorbidities with the Elixhauser comorbidity index.

Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to analyze the in-hospital mortality prediction capacity of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, and the area under the curve (AUC) was described. A Delong test [30] was performed to compare the AUC. We used the Youden's index to identify the best cut-off point for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices.

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp. in Armonk, NY) and Stata version 16 (Stata, College Station, Texas, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Ethical aspects

Our study follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for research on human beings. The data was extracted from the Spanish Ministry of Health register, which is anonymous following Spanish legislation. Identifying patients at the individual or reporting unit level with the data obtained is impossible.

Results

General population characteristics

Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, a total of 125,622 cases with the diagnosis of AP were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 110,021 patients were included (Fig. 1). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the population and its variations during the period are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 64.32 ± 17.94 years, with a slight progressive decrease throughout the years. The 53.3% of patients were 65 years or older. Male sex prevalence was 53.1%, which significantly increased during the study period (p = 0.043). The most frequent etiologies of AP were biliary (41.2%) and alcohol (7.9%). The Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices values progressively increased in the last years of the study period (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Case Selection Flow Chart. AP: acute pancreatitis IDC-10: 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis
Full size table

General outcomes

The proportion of patients who required ICU admission was 4.7%, with no differences in its prevalence by year studied. The mean length of hospital stay was 9.38 ± 12.22 days, showing a significant decrease over the period. Pancreatic necrosis was reported in 8.5% in 2018 and 9.2% in 2019 (Table 1).

Mortality

Mortality was 3.8% in all the population and significantly decreased over time, from 4.1% in 2016 to 3.5% in 2019 (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

Impact of Age, sex, and etiology

Age and male sex were higher in the non-survivors compared to the group of survivors (78.02 ± 13.24 vs. 63.78 ± 17.89, p =  < 0.001 and 51.1% vs. 53.2%, p = 0.007, respectively). The prevalence of pancreatitis of biliary, alcoholic, and drug-related etiology was lower in the group of non-survivors (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Demographic characteristics of acute pancreatitis according to survivor and non-survivors
Full size table

Impact of comorbidities and indexes

Non-survivor patients presented a higher percentage in all comorbidities except for obesity (Table 2).

Median values of Charlson and Elixhauser indexes were significantly higher in the group of non-survivors compared with survivors (1.76 ± 2.1 vs. 0.92 ± 1.43, p < 0.001 and 7.15 ± 7.4 vs. 3.29 ± 5.8, p < 0.001 respectively) (Table 2). The analysis of the comorbidities included in the Charlson and Elixhauser indices according to hospital mortality is described in the supplementary material (Additional file 1).

Multivariable analysis

Logistic regression analysis was performed using the best cut-off point obtained by Youden's index (J = 1.5 points for both Charlson and Elixhauser indices). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found that factors independently associated with mortality were age 65 years or older (OR 4.11, 95% CI 3.75–4.5), heart disease (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.62–1.86), renal disease (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.74–2.07), moderate-severe liver disease (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.35–3.47), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25–1.64), and cerebrovascular disease (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.4–1.9). Arterial hypertension has been found to be a protective factor in the population. The Charlson Index > 1.5 points (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.9–2.16) and Elixhauser Index > 1.5 points (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.53–2.9) were independently associated with mortality (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariable analysis showing association of proposed risk factors with hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis
Full size table

AUC analysis

The Elixhauser comorbidity index exhibited a slightly higher AUC value in predicting hospital mortality (AUC: 0.666, 95% CI 0.657 – 0.674) than the Charlson comorbidity index (AUC: 0.633, 95% CI 0.623 – 0.641). When performing the Delong test to compare these AUC, it was observed that this difference is significant (p < 0.001). The ROC curves and AUC for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices to predict hospital mortality are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve and AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index in predicting the hospital mortality rate in patients with acute pancreatitis

Full size image

Discussion

Our study found that pre-admission comorbidities such as heart disease, kidney disease, moderate-severe liver disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and age ≥ 65 years were independently associated with mortality in AP. Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices were independently associated with mortality.

Advanced age has been extensively studied as a marker of severity and mortality in AP. Most studies report longer hospitalization [31, 32] and higher overall mortality from AP in elderly patients [33,34,35,36]. However, other studies have observed that older patients may have a more severe course of AP but do not present increased mortality [37]. Likely explanations explaining advanced age as a risk factor for mortality include a proinflammatory state in older people [38] and increased production of cytokines in elderly patients with sepsis [39]. Other reasons would be delayed diagnosis and treatment due to less clinical and analytical expression [40, 41].

The increase in life expectancy and the aging of the population have been associated with the increase in patients with comorbidities [42, 43], so determining its impact on AP becomes more necessary. The importance of comorbidities in predicting outcomes in other diseases that require acute hospital admission is well known [44,45,46]. However, few studies analyze the impact of comorbidities on severity and mortality in AP patients [47, 48]. Additionally, few studies have incorporated comorbidities in their clinical models when evaluating determinants of AP severity. Our study is one of the first studies in the literature that put in relevance the role of comorbidities in AP.

In the last period of our study, we observed an increase in comorbidities and the values of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices. These trends could be explained by the increase in life expectancy and the prevalence of chronic diseases in the European population in the last decades [49, 50]. However, despite the increase in comorbidities, hospital mortality has decreased in the period studied. The decrease in mortality is likely due to the advances in critical care medicine, step-up approach to treat infected necrosis, and surgical and endoscopic new approaches [3, 51].

Few studies had previously assessed comorbidity indexes' role in predicting mortality in patients with AP. Previous studies have observed that more comorbidities are associated with organ failure and mortality in patients with AP [47, 52]. In our study, we analyzed the Charlson and Elixhauser indices which are good predictors of mortality in other diseases [53, 54]. Our results showed that values > 1.5 points for both indices are independently associated with hospital mortality in AP after adjusting for age and sex. Future studies that expand knowledge of the effects of comorbidities on complications and mortality in patients with AP will improve the identification of patients at risk and their quality of care.

Regarding other comorbidities, our results align with previous studies stating that pre-existing heart and renal diseases predict mortality in patients with AP [19, 47, 55]. One hypothesis is that intravascular depletion and aggressive fluid resuscitation cause decompensation of previous heart and renal disease [55].

Similarly, to Frey et al. [47], we found an association between liver disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease with mortality. However, Murata et al. found no association between these diseases with mortality [55]. The worse results of AP in patients with liver diseases such as cirrhosis could be explained because they present an inflammatory syndrome with arterial vasodilation and release of proinflammatory cytokines that increase the severity of AP [56]. In addition, acute pancreatitis produces significant stress that could decompensate underlying chronic comorbidities and increase the risk of death.

Other major comorbidities before admission, such as chronic lung disease, were not independently associated with mortality, coinciding with the results of Murata et al. [55]. Similar controversial results were found regarding obesity, in which previous studies have observed that obesity is a risk factor for developing local and systemic complications and mortality in patients with AP [17, 57,58,59]. We did not find an association between hospital mortality and obesity, but this result has to be taken carefully due to the potential information bias because our results are based on the history of obesity recorded in the medical-administrative database and not on the BMI at hospital admission. In the same line, we did not find a relation between diabetes mellitus and mortality after the multivariable analysis. The literature remains controversial, with reports describing diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for mortality [20, 21]. However, Frey et al. found that diabetes increased the risk of multiple organ failure but was not associated with mortality [47].

Other risk factors classically related to mortality in AP patients failed to represent a risk factor in our population. This was relevant to the role of AP etiology, in which the literature reports controversial results, identifying a more severe course and higher mortality in alcoholic pancreatitis [58, 59]. In contrast, others observed greater severity in biliary pancreatitis [60, 61] or no relation with mortality between both aetiologies [37, 62,63,64]. Our study did not observe that acute pancreatitis's biliary or alcoholic etiology was associated with higher hospital mortality. However, in our study, 44.3% of the patients were classified as "unspecified acute pancreatitis,” limiting the precision of our results and constituting a bias regarding the real impact of etiology in AP mortality. In addition, our database does not include other etiologies of acute pancreatitis such as those caused by hypercalcemia, after trauma, viral infections, anatomical variants, iatrogenic after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions [65,66,67].

Our study is subject to some limitations. The data analysis from a clinical-administrative base has low level of granularity and does not include some clinical results of interest, such as severity or the evolution of the patient in the medium or long term after their hospital stay. Our study could not identify pancreatic necrosis in the first two years because it began to be considered in the ICD-10 in 2018. Another limitation is the potential underreporting of information because the hospital discharge report may be incomplete or poorly registered by the technical-administrative staff. In our study, we could not identify the etiology of AP in many patients due to a lack of precise coding.

No studies have been published to validate the use of ICD-10 codes for identifying patients with AP using the RAE-CMBD database. However, there are recent studies from Danish [68] and US [69] databases with PPV of 97.3% and 87%, respectively. A recent meta-analysis recommends using ICD codes only in incident cases of AP in adults, where it reaches a PPV of 78% [70]. However, this may be because the studies analyzed used ICD-8, ICD-9, and ICD-10 codes, and the PPV is higher when using the ICD-10 because it is more specific and includes the etiology of pancreatitis [70, 71]. In addition, the studies were carried out in different hospitals in several countries, contributing to the heterogeneity.

We used the primary and the first registered secondary diagnoses to reduce the bias of not including patients with an initial diagnosis of cholelithiasis/choledocholithiasis and AP. A recent study validating ICD codes using primary and secondary diagnoses observed a PPV of 97.3% for AP [68].

The main strength of our study is its large sample size which provides strong statistical power. The RAE-CMBD database is a mandatory registry for the Spanish National Health System, which covers almost 100% of admissions in Spain, reinforcing the external validity of our results. In addition, the database has several internal audit mechanisms and has proven its usefulness for health research [53, 72, 73].

Conclusions

Comorbidities such as heart disease, kidney disease, moderate-severe liver disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and advanced age were independently associated with mortality in AP. The Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices are useful for predicting hospital mortality in these patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AP:

Acute pancreatitis

APACHE II:

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II

CTSI:

Computed tomography severity index

BISAP:

Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis

RAE-CMBD:

Registro de Actividad de Atención Especializada-Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos

ICD-10:

International classification of diseases version 10

POA:

Present on registration

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ROC:

Receiver-operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the curve

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Lund JL, Dellon ES, Williams JL, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: Update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:254-272.e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1972–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2006;33:323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen H-N, Lu C-L, Li C-Y. Epidemiology of first-attack acute pancreatitis in Taiwan from 2000 through 2009: a nationwide population-based study. Pancreas. 2012;41:696–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Dijk SM, Hallensleben NDL, van Santvoort HC, Fockens P, van Goor H, Bruno MJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis: recent advances through randomised trials. Gut. 2017;66:2024–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrov MS, Shanbhag S, Chakraborty M, Phillips ARJ, Windsor JA. Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:813–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, O’Connell M, Sanders MK, Slivka A, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson’s, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:435–41 (quiz 442).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gravante G, Garcea G, Ong SL, Metcalfe MS, Berry DP, Lloyd DM, et al. Prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of the published evidence. Pancreatology. 2009;9:601–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pando E, Alberti P, Hidalgo J, Vidal L, Dopazo C, Caralt M, et al. The role of extra-pancreatic infections in the prediction of severity and local complications in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018;18:486–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alberti P, Pando E, Mata R, Vidal L, Roson N, Mast R, et al. Evaluation of the modified computed tomography severity index (MCTSI) and computed tomography severity index (CTSI) in predicting severity and clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis. J Dig Dis. 2021;22:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Larvin M, McMahon MJ. APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 1989;2:201–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, Fink SD, Eng K, Localio SA. Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974;61:443–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut. 2008;57:1698–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pando E, Alberti P, Mata R, Gomez MJ, Vidal L, Cirera A, et al. Early changes in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) can predict mortality in acute pancreatitis: comparative study between BISAP score, APACHE-II, and other laboratory markers-a prospective observational study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;2021:6643595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Martínez J, Johnson CD, Sánchez-Payá J, de Madaria E, Robles-Díaz G, Pérez-Mateo M. Obesity is a definitive risk factor of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2006;6:206–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lloret Linares C, Pelletier AL, Czernichow S, Vergnaud AC, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Levy P, et al. Acute pancreatitis in a cohort of 129 patients referred for severe hypertriglyceridemia. Pancreas. 2008;37:13–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lankisch PG, Weber-Dany B, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Frequency and severity of acute pancreatitis in chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:1401–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huh JH, Jeon H, Park SM, Choi E, Lee GS, Kim JW, et al. Diabetes mellitus is associated with mortality in acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52:178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mikó A, Farkas N, Garami A, Szabó I, Vincze Á, Veres G, et al. Preexisting diabetes elevates risk of local and systemic complications in acute pancreatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas. 2018;47:917–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pascual-Ramos V, Duarte-Rojo A, Villa AR, Hernández-Cruz B, Alarcón-Segovia D, Alcocer-Varela J, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus as a cause and prognostic factor of acute pancreatitis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:707–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ministerio de Sanidad C y BS. Registro de Actividad de Atención Especializada del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (RAE-CMBD). 2021. https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/estadisticas/estMinisterio/SolicitudCMBD.htm.

  24. Majbar AA, Cusick E, Johnson P, Lynn RM, Hunt LP, Shield JPH. Incidence and Clinical Associations of Childhood Acute Pancreatitis. Pediatrics. 2016;138:1198.

  25. Sakorafas GH, Tsiotou AG. Etiology and pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis: current concepts. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30:343–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi J-C, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care. 2009;47:626–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, et al. Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas. 2011;40:1018–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McNabb-Baltar J, Ravi P, Isabwe GA, Suleiman SL, Yaghoobi M, Trinh Q-D, et al. A population-based assessment of the burden of acute pancreatitis in the United States. Pancreas. 2014;43:687–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tonsi AF, Bacchion M, Crippa S, Malleo G, Bassi C. Acute pancreatitis at the beginning of the 21st century: the state of the art. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:2945–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gardner TB, Vege SS, Chari ST, Pearson RK, Clain JE, Topazian MD, et al. The effect of age on hospital outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2008;8:265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Xin M-J, Chen H, Luo B, Sun J-B. Severe acute pancreatitis in the elderly: etiology and clinical characteristics. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:2517–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Malik AM. Biliary pancreatitis. Deadly threat to the elderly. Is it a real threat? Int J Health Sci. 2015;9:35–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gullo L, Migliori M, Oláh A, Farkas G, Levy P, Arvanitakis C, et al. Acute pancreatitis in five European countries: etiology and mortality. Pancreas. 2002;24:223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Starr ME, Ueda J, Yamamoto S, Evers BM, Saito H. The effects of aging on pulmonary oxidative damage, protein nitration, and extracellular superoxide dismutase down-regulation during systemic inflammation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;50:371–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Turnbull IR, Clark AT, Stromberg PE, Dixon DJ, Woolsey CA, Davis CG, et al. Effects of aging on the immunopathologic response to sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1018–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lyon C, Clark DC. Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in older patients. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74:1537–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Potts FE, Vukov LF. Utility of fever and leukocytosis in acute surgical abdomens in octogenarians and beyond. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54:M55–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2269–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Starfield B, Lemke KW, Bernhardt T, Foldes SS, Forrest CB, Weiner JP. Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in “case” management. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:8–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mnatzaganian G, Ryan P, Norman PE, Hiller JE. Accuracy of hospital morbidity data and the performance of comorbidity scores as predictors of mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:107–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ho T-W, Tsai Y-J, Ruan S-Y, Huang C-T, Lai F, Yu C-J, et al. In-hospital and one-year mortality and their predictors in patients hospitalized for first-ever chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114866.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Pocock SJ, Wang D, Pfeffer MA, Yusuf S, McMurray JJV, Swedberg KB, et al. Predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:65–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Frey C, Zhou H, Harvey D, White RH. Co-morbidity is a strong predictor of early death and multi-organ system failure among patients with acute pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:733–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Akshintala VS, Hutfless SM, Yadav D, Khashab MA, Lennon AM, Makary MA, et al. A population-based study of severity in patients with acute on chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2013;42:1245–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roser M, Ortiz-Ospina E, Ritchie H. Life Expectancy. OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: “https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy.” 2013.

  50. Eurostat. Mortality and life expectancy statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Mortality_and_life_expectancy_statistics. 2022.

  51. Pitchumoni CS, Patel NM, Shah P. Factors influencing mortality in acute pancreatitis: can we alter them? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:798–814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Weitz G, Woitalla J, Wellhöner P, Schmidt KJ, Büning J, Fellermann K. Comorbidity in acute pancreatitis relates to organ failure but not to local complications. Z Gastroenterol. 2016;54:226–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pedraza-Serrano F, Jiménez-García R, López-de-Andrés A, Hernández-Barrera V, Esteban-Hernández J, Sánchez-Muñoz G, et al. Comorbidities and risk of mortality among hospitalized patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Spain from 2002 to 2014. Respir Med. 2018;138:137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Menendez ME, Neuhaus V, van Dijk CN, Ring D. The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2878–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Murata A, Ohtani M, Muramatsu K, Matsuda S. Influence of comorbidity on outcomes of older patients with acute pancreatitis based on a national administrative database. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2015;14:422–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, Schnabl B, Arroyo V. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: From peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:1272–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shin KY, Lee WS, Chung DW, Heo J, Jung MK, Tak WY, et al. Influence of obesity on the severity and clinical outcome of acute pancreatitis. Gut Liver. 2011;5:335–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Moran RA, García-Rayado G, de la Iglesia-García D, Martínez-Moneo E, Fort-Martorell E, Lauret-Braña E, et al. Influence of age, body mass index and comorbidity on major outcomes in acute pancreatitis, a prospective nation-wide multicentre study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018;6:1508–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hong S, Qiwen B, Ying J, Wei A, Chaoyang T. Body mass index and the risk and prognosis of acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:1136–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, Fink SD, Eng K, Spencer FC. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139:69–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Frey CF. Gallstone pancreatitis. Surg Clin North Am. 1981;61:923–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Samanta J, Dhaka N, Gupta P, Singh AK, Yadav TD, Gupta V, et al. Comparative study of the outcome between alcohol and gallstone pancreatitis in a high-volume tertiary care center. JGH Open. 2019;3:338–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Andersen AM, Novovic S, Ersbøll AK, Hansen MB. Mortality in alcohol and biliary acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2008;36:432–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bálint ER, Fűr G, Kiss L, Németh DI, Soós A, Hegyi P, et al. Assessment of the course of acute pancreatitis in the light of aetiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:17936.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Gardner TB. Acute Pancreatitis. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:ITC17-32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:143-149.e9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Facciorusso A, di Maso M, Serviddio G, Larghi A, Costamagna G, Muscatiello N. Echoendoscopic ethanol ablation of tumor combined with celiac plexus neurolysis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:439–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kirkegård J, Mortensen MR, Johannsen IR, Mortensen FV, Cronin-Fenton D. Positive predictive value of acute and chronic pancreatitis diagnoses in the danish national patient registry: A validation study. Scand J Public Health. 2020;48:14–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Floyd JS, Bann MA, Felcher AH, Sapp D, Nguyen MD, Ajao A, et al. Validation of acute pancreatitis among adults in an integrated healthcare system. Epidemiology. 2023;34:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Xiao AY, Tan ML, Plana MN, Yadav D, Zamora J, Petrov MS. The use of international classification of diseases codes to identify patients with pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018;9:191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Razavi D, Ljung R, Lu Y, Andrén-Sandberg A, Lindblad M. Reliability of acute pancreatitis diagnosis coding in a National Patient Register: a validation study in Sweden. Pancreatology. 2011;11:525–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ribera A, Marsal JR, Ferreira-González I, Cascant P, Pons JM, Mitjavila F, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality with coronary bypass surgery using hospital discharge data: comparison with a prospective observational study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008;61:843–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Guillaumes S, Hoyuela C, Hidalgo NJ, Juvany M, Bachero I, Ardid J, et al. Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach. Hernia. 2021;25:1345–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication has been made as part of the Doctoral Program in Surgery and Morphologic Sciences of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain. Departments of Surgery and Morphological Science at the Universitat Autònoma.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Nils Jimmy Hidalgo & Elizabeth Pando

  2. Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Passeig de La Vall d’Hebron, 119-129. 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    Nils Jimmy Hidalgo, Elizabeth Pando, Rodrigo Mata, Nair Fernandes, Sara Villasante, Marta Barros, Daniel Herms, Laia Blanco, Joaquim Balsells & Ramon Charco

Authors
  1. Nils Jimmy Hidalgo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Pando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rodrigo Mata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nair Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sara Villasante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marta Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Herms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Laia Blanco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Joaquim Balsells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ramon Charco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NJH: project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and editing. EP: project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and editing. RM: data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and editing. NF: data collection, manuscript editing. SV: data collection, manuscript editing. MB: data collection, manuscript editing. DH: data collection, manuscript editing. LB: data collection, manuscript editing. JB: project development, manuscript editing. RC: project development, manuscript writing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Pando.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for research on human beings. The data was extracted from the Spanish Ministry of Health record, which is anonymous. Identifying the patients at the individual or reporting unit level is impossible as this database is subject to the Civil Service Statistics Law 12/1989. Obtaining informed consent or approval from an ethics committee was not necessary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable; this manuscript does not contain individual personal data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This publication has been made as part of the Doctoral Program in Surgery and Morphologic Sciences of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. The ICD-10 codes used to identify specific comorbidities. Table S2. Association of comorbidities of Charlson Comorbidity Index and hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis. Table S3. Association of comorbidities of Elixhauser Comorbidity Index and hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hidalgo, N.J., Pando, E., Mata, R. et al. Impact of comorbidities on hospital mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis: a population-based study of 110,021 patients. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 81 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02730-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02730-6

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us