Skip to main content

Racial or ethnic differences on treatment adherence and persistence among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases initiated with biologic therapies



Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease with the potential for significant morbidity in case of suboptimal treatment (e.g. low treatment adherence). In spite of immense research in IBD, literature on association of IBD with race/ethnicity is fragmented. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence and persistence among patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) initiated with biologic therapies.


This observational, retrospective study utilized the Optum Clinformatics (Optum) Extended Data Mart Socioeconomic Status (SES) database. Adult patients with ≥ 2 medical claims for CD or UC diagnosis, ≥ 1 medical or pharmacy claim for corresponding FDA-approved biologic therapy, and a ≥ 12-month pre-index (index date: date of the first biologic medical/pharmacy claim) continuous health plan enrollment were included. Treatment adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered of ≥ 80% and treatment persistence by the number of days from the index date to the biologics discontinuation date. Switching among biologics was allowed for both treatment adherence and treatment persistence. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence/persistence.


Among patients with CD (N = 1430) and UC (N = 1059) included, majority were White (CD: 80.3%, UC: 78.3%), followed by African Americans (AA; CD: 10.5%, UC: 9.7%). Among patients with CD, AA were significantly less likely to adhere to biologics (adjusted OR [95%CI]: 0.61 [0.38; 0.99]) and more likely to discontinue biologics earlier (adjusted HR [95%CI]: 1.52 [1.16; 2.0]) during the follow-up period compared to Whites, after adjusting for other patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Among patients with UC, no significant differences in the treatment adherence/persistence were observed between different races/ethnicities.


Patients with CD were found to display racial differences in the treatment adherence and persistence of biologics, with significantly lower adherence and earlier discontinuation in AA compared to Whites. Such differences were not observed in patients with UC. Future studies are warranted to understand the possible reasons for racial differences, particularly in patients with CD.

Peer Review reports


Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two main subtypes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1], which are chronic, debilitating, and cannot be cured [2]. In CD, any portion of the gastrointestinal tract can be affected with a transmural inflammation in all the tissue layers of the gastrointestinal lining, whereas in UC, the disease is limited to the mucosa of the rectum and the colon [3]. It can be difficult to distinguish between CD and UC, and the evaluation of the clinical profile including disease symptoms and location, radiological and endoscopic findings, and the histopathology profile may facilitate in differentiating between CD and UC [2, 3].

There has been an increasing trend in the number of patients with IBD (either CD or UC) in the US, with nearly 70,000 new individuals diagnosed every year; by 2014, an estimated 1.6 million adults were affected [4]. Several factors are associated with rising incidence of IBD including smoking, and a diet high in sugar and animal fat and low in fiber and fruits [5]. Traditionally, the prevalence of IBD has been higher among Whites as compared with other races [6,7,8,9], however, many of these studies were conducted in areas with low populations of minorities [9,10,11]. An increase in the incidence and prevalence of IBD among minorities including African Americans (AA), Hispanics, and Asians has been reported [9, 12], and this rise has been rapid especially among AA over the past three decades [9, 13]. There have been differences in the disease extent among different races, for example, peri-anal and fistulizing disease phenotypes of CD are typically more aggressive in AA patients versus others [9, 14,15,16,17].

In general, literature describing IBD among AA and other races are limited [18]. Racial and ethnic minorities continue to be under-represented in IBD clinical trials. As reported in 2020, AA and Hispanics comprised 12.4% and 18.7% of the US population [19], respectively, however, only 1.9% and 2.3% of IBD trial participants were AA and Hispanics/Latino, respectively [20]. Given the lack of patient heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world studies that include race and ethnicity data can better assess the differences among minority populations.

Biologics are the recommended agents for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe CD [21] or UC [22] who are non-responsive to conventional therapies. In chronic diseases such as IBD, treatment required is to be taken lifelong or for a major portion of life, and hence, medication adherence and persistence are significant challenges [23]. Treatment non-adherence or discontinuation is associated with several complications including worsening of disease or relapse, and increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost [23,24,25]. In a systematic review, Khan et al. evaluated the real-world evidence on the adherence and persistence of biologic therapies in patients with IBD and reported non-adherence to biologics in 38%‐77% of patients, depending on the medication possession rate threshold of < 80% or < 86%. The discontinuation of biologics was reported in 0%-25% of the patients within 3 months in 6 studies and 7%-65% of patients within 12 months in 13 studies [25].

Access to disease-modifying agents for the treatment of immunologic conditions has been shown to vary by demographics, potentially contributing to poorer outcomes and more severe disease in racial/ethnic minorities [26, 27]. A systematic review has also demonstrated the role of race- and socioeconomic status (SES)-related factors in the healthcare delivery and effectiveness of treatment in patients with IBD [18].

For these reasons, understanding the roles of race, ethnicity, and other social determinants of health on treatment adherence is critical. Limited real-world evidence is available in the literature regarding the impact of race, ethnicity, and other SES determinants on treatment adherence among patients with IBD. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence and treatment persistence with the adjustment of other SES and clinical characteristics.


Data source

In this observational, retrospective database analysis, Optum Clinformatics (Optum) Extended Data Mart SES, a de-identified database of administrative claims by members of a commercial insurance plan and Medicare Advantage was utilized. The Optum claims database includes details on patient demographics, enrollment start and end dates, de-identified adjudicated pharmacy claims (e.g., outpatient prescriptions) and medical claims (e.g., inpatient and outpatient services), healthcare facilities, and pharmacies featuring information on physician visit, medical procedure, hospitalization, drug dispensed, date of service/prescription, and the number of days of medication supplied. In addition, the Optum SES database includes SES measures for each member, along with race/ethnicity, education, and household income. In this study, patient confidentiality was preserved, and the anonymity of the patient data was safeguarded. No waiver of informed consent was required from an institutional review board.

Study design and patient population

Study patients were required to have at least one medical or pharmacy claim for FDA-approved biologic therapy, including adalimumab, certolizumab pegol (CD only), golimumab (UC only), infliximab, natalizumab (CD only), vedolizumab, and ustekinumab. The date of the first medical or pharmacy claim for the biologic therapy was designated as the index date. Patients were also required to be aged ≥ 18 years at the index date, having at least 2 medical claims for CD or UC diagnosis on different days from 1/1/2016 to 06/30/2020, with the first diagnosis occurring during the 12-month pre-index period, and having at least a ≥ 12-month pre-index continuous health plan enrollment. To evaluate treatment adherence within the timeframe of interest, patients were required to have at least a 3-, 6-, 9- or 12-month post-index continuous health plan enrollment, respectively. To evaluate treatment persistence over time, a variable follow-up period was adopted. Patients who received any biologic therapy of interest during the 12-month pre-index period or had ≥ 2 different biologic therapies of interest on the index date, were excluded. For patients included in the CD cohort, those with ≥ 1 UC diagnosis at the baseline were excluded; similarly, patients with ≥ 1 CD diagnosis at the baseline were excluded from the UC cohort. Patients with a missing value for race/ethnicity were also excluded (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design. CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis

Study variables

The SES characteristics included race/ethnicity, age, gender, region, education level, household income, housing (homeowner/not), and health insurance type (health maintenance organization [HMO], preferred provider organization [PPO], other). HMO is an entity that provides, offers, or arranges for coverage of designated health services needed by members for a fixed, prepaid premium. Members of an HMO generally are required to use participating or approved providers for all health services. PPO is a managed care delivery model consisting of preferred networks of providers with some out-of- network coverage. PPOs offer patients more choice and flexibility than HMOs with correspondingly higher premiums. Whereas Point-of-Service (POS) Plan is a managed care delivery model that combines aspects of an HMO and a PPO. Patients can receive care either from physicians contracted or not contracted through the plan; financial incentives exist for patients to use contracted providers. The clinical characteristics included the Quan-Charlson comorbidity index (QCI), list of comorbidities, immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, surgery, and medication use such as opioids, antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators, measured during the 12-month pre-index period.

Both pharmacy and medical claims were used to evaluate treatment adherence and persistence for biologics. Values in the days’ supply field for biologics from pharmacy claims were used directly, whereas values of days’ supply for biologics from medical claims were imputed based on the indicated days’ supply of the maintenance dosing schedule for each biologic therapy according to the prescribing information in the US [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The treatment adherence to biologics was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the 3-, 6-, 9- or 12-month post-index follow -up period for patients with at least a 3-, 6-, 9- or 12-month continuous enrollment in follow-up, respectively. The PDC was calculated as the sum of the non-overlapped days’ supplies of study treatments (i.e., the number of days the patient is covered by the treatment) divided by days of the follow-up period. Switching to other approved biologics for the treatment of the condition of interest during the follow-up period was considered as a continuation of these biologic therapies. Patients were considered adherent to biologic therapies if PDC ≥ 80%; PDC < 80% was considered non-adherence.

The treatment persistence of biologics was measured by the number of days from the index date to the discontinuation date of the biologic of interest. Similarly, switching to another biologic that was approved for the treatment of the condition during the follow-up period was considered a continuation of these biologic therapies. Discontinuation of the biologic was defined as a gap of larger than 90 days between the end of days’ supply of one prescription and the date of the next prescription; the discontinuation date of the biologic was designated as the fill date plus days’ supply of the last prescription filled prior to the gap in therapy. If discontinuation was not observed, patients were censored at the end of their continuous enrollment or the end of the study period, whichever comes first. The percentage of patients who discontinued their biologic treatment during the follow-up period was described.

Statistical analyses

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns were examined descriptively. Means and standard deviations were reported for continuous variables whereas numbers and percentages were reported for categorical variables. The time-to-discontinuation among comparison groups were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank tests.

For multivariate analyses, stepwise and penalized regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) methods were used to perform the initial selection of covariates included in regression models. The final decision regarding the inclusion of covariates were made after the review of the results from descriptive analyses, stepwise and penalized regressions. All multivariate analyses were performed among patients with non-missing household income. To evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and 12-month treatment adherence (i.e., PDC ≥ 0.8 vs PDC < 0.8) after adjusting for baseline covariates, multivariable logistic regression was performed among patients with at least a 12-month post-index continuous enrollment. Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and the time to treatment discontinuation after adjusting for baseline covariates including SES and clinical characteristics of interest. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical analysis software (SAS) Enterprise Guide, version 7.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


Overall, 1430 patients with CD and 1059 patients with UC met patient identification criteria and were analyzed.

Patients with CD

Socioeconomic status and clinical characteristics

Of the 1430 CD patients, almost half (50.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 41.8 (16.4) years. The majority of patients were White (80.3%), followed by AA (10.5%), Hispanic (6.1%), and Asian (3.1%). Nearly two-thirds (68.0%) of the AA patients resided in the South region (Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi), with low education (only 13.3% had a Bachelor’s degree and above) and low household income (32% had < $40 k income). The mean (SD) QCI was 0.6 (1.2), and the most frequently observed comorbid condition was abdominal pain (63.7%), followed by diarrhea (46.2%) and anemia (32.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Socioeconomic Status and clinical characteristics of patients with CD or UC

Treatment adherence and persistence for patients with CD

During the 12-month post-index period, 66.4% of White patients were adherent to their biologics, followed by Asians (62.9%), Hispanics (60.0%), and AA (53.8%). Overall, White patients had numerically better treatment adherence as compared with the other racial/ethnic groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Treatment adherence for patients with CD. CD, Crohn’s disease; PDC, proportion of days covered

A total of 40.8% of patients discontinued biologics at a median follow-up of 278 days. The percentage of AA discontinuing biologics were 54.7%, followed by Asians (45.5%), Hispanics (39.1%), and Whites (38.9%). The Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that AA had a significantly (p < 0.001) shorter time to treatment discontinuation as compared with other racial/ethnic groups (median days, AA: 533; White: 919; Hispanic: 948; Asian: 796) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-treatment discontinuation (persistence) across racial groups for CD (N = 1,430) patients

Note: Survival indicates probability of patients continuing treatment. CD, Crohn’s disease

Among patients with 12-month post-index continuous enrollment (n = 916), the adjusted multivariate regression analysis showed that AA patients were less likely to adhere to biologics during the 12-month period compared with White patients (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.38; 0.99]). No significant difference in the treatment adherence was observed between White patients and other racial/ethnic groups after adjusting for other SES and clinical characteristics (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate analysis for treatment adherence and discontinuation in patients with CD or UC

The adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that AA patients were more likely to discontinue biologics earlier during the follow-up period (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.52 [1.16; 2.0]) compared with White patients. Other racial/ethnic groups did not show significant differences compared with White patients (Table 2).

Patients with UC

Socioeconomic status and clinical characteristics

Of the 1059 UC patients, more than half (53.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 44.7 (17.2) years. The majority of patients were White (78.3%), followed by AA (9.7%), Hispanic (9.0%), and Asian (3.0%). Approximately three-fourths of the AA patients (75.7%) resided in the South region (Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi), with low education (only 9.7% had a Bachelor’s degree and above) and low household income (23.3% had < $40 k income). The mean (SD) QCI was 0.7 (1.5), and the most frequently observed comorbid condition was diarrhea (65.4%), followed by abdominal pain (53.9%) and anemia (34.4%).

Treatment adherence and persistence for patients with UC

During the 12-month post-index period, 63.8% of AA patients were adherent to their biologics, followed by Whites (63%), Hispanics (58.2%), and Asians (56.5%). Figure 4 describes statistics on the treatment adherence for each racial/ethnic group of patients with different duration of continuous enrollment.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Treatment adherence for patients with UC. PDC, proportion of days covered; UC, ulcerative colitis

A total of 46.5% patients discontinued biologics at a median follow-up of 252 days. Numerically, Hispanic patients were the most likely to discontinue biologics whereas Asian patients were the least likely (White: 46.1%; AA: 46.6%; Hispanic: 51.6%; Asian: 40.6%). The Kaplan–Meier curves indicated no significant (p = 0.9351) differences in treatment persistence among the racial/ethnic groups (median days, AA: 701; White: 730; Hispanic: 626; Asian: 671) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Kaplan Meier analysis of time-to-treatment discontinuation (persistence) across racial groups for UC (N = 1,059) patients

Note: Survival indicates probability of patients continuing treatment. UC, ulcerative colitis

Among patients with the 12-month post-index continuous enrollment (n = 682), the adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that no statistically significant difference in the adherence to biologics for AA (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.45 [0.78; 2.71]), Asian (0.56 [0.20; 1.56]), and Hispanic (0.85 [0.47; 1.55]) patients as compared to White patients during the 12-month period (Table 2). Similarly, the adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis revealed no significant difference in the time to discontinuation of biologics for these racial/ethnic groups compared to White patients during the follow-up period (adjusted HR [95% CI]: AA: 1.00 [0.71; 1.42], Asian: 0.83 [0.42; 1.63], and Hispanic: 1.14 [0.81; 1.60]) (Table 2).


The use of biologic agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC has been well-established [21, 22]. It has been known that non‐adherence to biologics may affect disease remission, which in turn may lead to overall deteriorated health outcomes [25, 35, 36]. Furthermore, published literature have indicated that improving treatment adherence may be associated with overall improved disease status and decreased morbidity, mortality, and overall healthcare expenses [23,24,25]. However, limited evidence is available regarding the impact of race and ethnicity on treatment compliance and continuation among patients with IBD. This observational, retrospective study provides an important contribution to the existing literature, by assessing the association between race/ethnicity, treatment adherence, and persistence among patients with CD or UC who initiated biologics in a commercially insured population in the US.

Our study demonstrated a significant association between race/ethnicity, treatment adherence, and persistence for patients with CD even after controlling for socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. In our study, nearly two-thirds of the AA patients resided in the South region which was confirmed by the US 2020 Census (Census). More specifically, the Census showed that AA population are mostly concentrated in the South [37]. Compared to White patients, AA patients with CD in our study were less likely to adhere to biologics during the 12-month study period and more likely to discontinue biologics earlier. However, in patients with UC, no significant association between race/ethnicity, treatment adherence, or persistence was observed. The Asian population had the best adherence at month 3, 6, and 9, but not at month 12. In addition to the small sample size at month 12, the Asian population are culturally very different. It is possible that disease perceptions and acceptance of treatment are different in this culturally unique population. Previous studies of South Asian patients also reported lower rates of biologic use, suggesting that financial burden is unlikely to be the leading explanation for the lower use of biologic agents in South Asian patients. Asian patients were more likely to attribute their disease to “causes other than known causes,” which influenced their acceptance of treatment [38, 39]. Several studies have also reported racial differences in the adherence to biologics in patients with IBD. In a cross-sectional study by Nguyen et al., race was amongst the predictors of adherence with significantly higher adherence reported in Whites as compared with AA (80% vs. 50%; P < 0.0001) [40]. A systematic review published in 2013 evaluated 13 studies and reported a pooled adherence rate with biologics in patients with IBD at 82.6% (range: 36.8%-96%). Hispanic and AA were reported as predictors of non-adherence to biologics [41]. However, most of these studies evaluated the IBD population as a whole, and not patients with CD or UC separately [9, 40, 41]. Our study adds real-world evidence to the existing literature with a focus on the evaluation of biologic adherence and persistence for patients with CD or UC.

There is a lack of diversity in racial/ethnic populations in clinical trials among patients with IBD, with most of the patients being White and minorities underrepresented [19, 20]. Therefore, the implications on response to treatment and differences in the drug metabolism among different races may not be well understood. The current management approaches among patients with IBD are based on studies conducted primarily on White patients. Hence, clinical studies in diverse populations are warranted that may elicit a better understating of the IBD manifestations, possible treatment options, and their outcomes [42].

Our study has demonstrated racial differences in treatment adherence and persistence among patients with CD but not patients with UC. One of the possible reasons for such differential findings could be attributed to potential differences in disease manifestation/ treatment responses between CD and UC in patients’ ethnicities, particularly the most severe forms for e.g., the perianal and fistulizing disease in AA patients with CD compared with other races. However, consistent differences in the disease extent between different races/ethnicities in UC have not been demonstrated [42]. More severe disease would lead to better adherence to maximize the treatment effect, but if less effective, to greater discontinuation. It has also been suggested that penetration of biologics in UC is much less than CD. Findings from a large retrospective study with 9,145 biologic-naïve patients newly diagnosed with IBD from 2008 to 2015, included 5,612 patients (61.37%) with CD and 3,533 patients (38.63%) with UC suggested that patients with UC had slightly increased risk of stopping initial biologic treatment than patients with CD [43]. The clinical factors that may increase the risk of non-persistence, included having infection diagnosis in the past 30 days, changing diagnosis between CD and UC, treatment with steroids. In another similar retrospective study in 415,405 patients of which 188,842 patients with CD and 195,183 were patients with UC, during the 9-year study duration, the proportion of all patients using biologics increased in CD, 21.8% to 43.8%, whereas in UC, the proportion of patients using biologics increased from 5.1% to 16.2% [44]. Hospitalization, steroids use, and infection diagnosis are among the strongest predictors, suggesting treatment side effects and worsening disease are likely to be the major reason for discontinuation of treatment. A similar trend is observed in our study between adherence in patients with CD or UC. Additionally, different treatment practices in CD and UC can be a reason for discontinuation. Use of biologic is usually a late-line therapy in UC compared to CD, which is often viewed as “curable” after surgery, but CD is a chronic disease and warrants long-term therapy. There is underrepresentation of diverse groups in clinical trials and future studies are warranted for a better understanding of the attributes potentially associated with lack of adherence amongst minorities. Although genetics of CD in AA patients are well documented, under-representation in RCT persists in fully understanding therapeutic responses to treatment. Possible factors that lead to poor compliance in minority races require further investigation, particularly in patients with CD. Some of the factors that need to be looked into are racial differences in response to biologics treatment (genetic factors), the standard of care received by minorities compared to other races, delays in switching biologics treatments in the absence of clinical response in minorities, and providers’ perception regarding treatment management among different races [42]. Nearly all of the above factors are possible but with the possible exception of genetics, there shouldn’t be any difference in the other factors between CD or UC. Further studies are needed to better understand the possible reasons for observed racial differences in CD patients.

The present analysis has several limitations. First, the administrative claims data were collected to facilitate payment for healthcare services, and definitive diagnoses were not available. Second, the reasons for switching, discontinuation, dose escalation, or adding adjunctive therapy were not available, hence, the effect of these factors on treatment decisions/patterns was unknown. In patients with IBD, the loss of response to biologics is commonly encountered [45], and it has been demonstrated that patients’ response to the treatment affected the adherence or persistence [4]. In claims data, possible reasons for treatment discontinuation are not captured. Hence, an association of treatment response with adherence or persistence could not be assessed in our analysis. In addition, the use of adherence and persistence measures does not guarantee whether patients used their treatments as prescribed. Third, potential exists for a misclassification of race. Although SES variables are available in the database, some were collected directly from public records while the remaining data were imputed from algorithms using enhanced geocoding, predictive modeling, and the US Census data [46]. Last but not least, this study is limited to patients covered by commercial and Medicare Advantage; therefore, the results may not be generalizable to patients with other insurance types (such as Medicaid population with lower SES), or those without health insurance coverage.


Findings from this study provide insights into the SES, clinical characteristics, treatment adherence, and persistence by race/ethnicity among patients with CD or UC initiated with biologics in the US. Compared to White patients, AA patients with CD were less likely to adhere to biologics, whereas in UC patients, no significant racial differences were observed. AA patients with CD were more likely to discontinue biologics earlier compared to White patients, whereas no significant racial differences were observed in patients with UC. Future large-scale studies in patients with CD or UC are warranted to validate the findings reported in this study, particularly to further understand possible factors leading to poor treatment compliance in patients with CD among diverse populations.

Availability of data and materials

The data sharing policy of Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson is available at Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at



African Americans


Crohn's disease


Confidence interval


Food and Drug Administration


Health maintenance organization


Hazard ratio


Inflammatory bowel disease


Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator


Optum Clinformatics


Odds ratio


Proportion of days covered


Preferred provider organization


Quan-Charlson comorbidity index


Randomized controlled trials


Statistical analysis software


Socioeconomic status


Standard deviation


Ulcerative colitis


United States


  1. Zhou N, Chen WX, Chen SH, Xu CF, Li YM. Inflammatory bowel disease unclassified. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011;12(4):280–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Odze RD. A contemporary and critical appraisal of ‘indeterminate colitis.’ Mod Pathol. 2015;28(1):S30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Panaccione R. Mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013;9(8):529–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan W, Chen A, Tiao D, Selinger C, Leong R. Medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease. Intest Res. 2017;15(4):434–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Owczarek D, Rodacki T, Domagała-Rodacka R, Cibor D, Mach T. Diet and nutritional factors in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(3):895–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakatos PL. Recent trends in the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel diseases: up or down? World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(38):6102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, Benchimol EI, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Barkema HW, et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(1):46–54-e42 quiz e30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Odes HS, Fraser D, Hollander L. Epidemiological data of Crohn’s disease in Israel: etiological implications. Public Health Rev. 1989;17(4):321–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Afzali A, Cross RK. Racial and ethnic minorities with inflammatory bowel disease in the United States: a systematic review of disease characteristics and differences. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(8):2023–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright JP, Marks IN, Jameson C, Garisch JA, Burns DG, Kottler RE. Inflammatory bowel disease in Cape Town, 1975–1980. Part II. Crohn’s disease. S Afr Med J. 1983;63(7):226–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Loftus EV Jr, Silverstein MD, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR. Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940–1993: incidence, prevalence, and survival. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(6):1161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschfield GM, Heathcote EJ, Gershwin ME. Pathogenesis of cholestatic liver disease and therapeutic approaches. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(5):1481–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu JJ. Disparity in the care of black inflammatory bowel disease patients. Inflammatory Bowel Dis. 2021;27(9):1548–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brant SR, Okou DT, Simpson CL, Cutler DJ, Haritunians T, Bradfield JP, Chopra P, Prince J, Begum F, Kumar A, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies african-specific susceptibility loci in African Americans with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):206-217.e202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dassopoulos T, Nguyen GC, Talor MV, Datta LW, Isaacs KL, Lewis JD, Gold MS, Valentine JF, Smoot DT, Harris ML, et al. NOD2 mutations and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies are risk factors for Crohn’s disease in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(2):378–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson JF 3rd, Dhere T, Repaka A, Shaukat A, Sitaraman S. Crohn’s disease in an African-American population. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336(5):389–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alli-Akintade L, Pruthvi P, Hadi N, Sachar D. Race and fistulizing perianal Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(3):e21-23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sewell JL, Velayos FS. Systematic review: The role of race and socioeconomic factors on IBD healthcare delivery and effectiveness. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(3):627–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones N MR, Ramirez R, Rios-Vargas M. 2020 Census Illuminates Racial and Ethnic Composition of the Country. [cited 07 Sep 2021]. Available from

  20. Johnson C, Barnes EL, Zhang X, Long MD. Trends and characteristics of clinical trials participation for inflammatory bowel disease in the United States: a report from IBD partners. Crohn’s & Colitis 360. 2020;2(2):23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feuerstein JD, Ho EY, Shmidt E, Singh H, Falck-Ytter Y, Sultan S, Terdiman JP, Sultan S, Cohen BL, Chachu K, et al. AGA clinical practice guidelines on the medical management of moderate to severe luminal and perianal fistulizing crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(7):2496–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Feuerstein JD, Isaacs KL, Schneider Y, Siddique SM, Falck-Ytter Y, Singh S. AGA clinical practice guidelines on the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1450–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lachaine J, Yen L, Beauchemin C, Hodgkins P. Medication adherence and persistence in the treatment of Canadian ulcerative colitis patients: analyses with the RAMQ database. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13(1):23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown MT, Bussell JK. Medication adherence: WHO cares? Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(4):304–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan S, Rupniewska E, Neighbors M, Singer D, Chiarappa J, Obando C. Real-world evidence on adherence, persistence, switching and dose escalation with biologics in adult inflammatory bowel disease in the United States: A systematic review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44(4):495–507.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dotson JL, Kappelman MD, Chisolm DJ, Crandall WV. Racial disparities in readmission, complications, and procedures in children with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(4):801–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kerr GS, Swearingen C, Mikuls TR, Yazici Y. Use of biologic therapy in racial minorities with rheumatoid arthritis from 2 US health care systems. J Clin Rheumatol. 2017;23(1):12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aguilera-Castro L, Ferre-Aracil C, Garcia-Garcia-de-Paredes A, Rodriguez-de-Santiago E, Lopez-Sanroman A. Management of complex perianal Crohn’s disease. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(1):33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matsuoka K, Fujii T, Okamoto R, Yamada A, Kunisaki R, Matsuura M, Watanabe K, Shiga H, Takatsu N, Bamba S, Mikami Y, Yamamoto T, Shimoyama T, Motoya S, Torisu T, Kobayashi T, Ohmiya N, Saruta M, Matsuda K, Matsumoto T, Nakase H, Maemoto A, Shinzaki S, Murata Y, Yoshigoe S, Sasaki A, Yajima T, Hisamatsu T. Characteristics of adult patients newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease: interim analysis of the nation-wide inception cohort registry study of patients with Crohn's disease in Japan (iCREST-CD). J Gastroenterol. 2022;57(11):867-78. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

  30. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfware, Japan, Diagnostic criteria and severity classification of intractable diseases: Crohn's disease; Overview, diagnostic criteria, etc, cited 2018 January 29, Available from

  31. Yao T, Matsui T, Hiwatashi N. Crohn’s disease in Japan: diagnostic criteria and epidemiology. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(10 Suppl):S85-93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsuoka K, Kobayashi T, Ueno F, Matsui T, Hirai F, Inoue N, Kato J, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi K, Koganei K, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(3):305–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55(6):749–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Im JP. Adalimumab or infliximab: which is better for perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease? Intest Res. 2017;15(2):147–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carter CT, Waters HC, Smith DB. Effect of a continuous measure of adherence with infliximab maintenance treatment on inpatient outcomes in Crohn’s disease. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wan GJ, Kozma CM, Slaton TL, Olson WH, Feagan BG. Inflammatory bowel disease: healthcare costs for patients who are adherent or non-adherent with infliximab therapy. J Med Econ. 2014;17(6):384–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. The Chance That Two People Chosen at Random Are of Different Race or Ethnicity Groups Has Increased Since 2010 [,-Figures%202%20and%203%20show]

  38. Jangi S, Ruan A, Korzenik J, de Silva P. South Asian patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the United States demonstrate more fistulizing and perianal crohn phenotype. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26(12):1933–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kochar B, Barnes EL, Herfarth HH, Martin CF, Ananthakrishnan AN, McGovern D, Long M, Sandler RS. Asians have more perianal Crohn disease and ocular manifestations compared with white Americans. Inflamm Intest Dis. 2018;2(3):147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nguyen GC, LaVeist TA, Harris ML, Datta LW, Bayless TM, Brant SR. Patient trust-in-physician and race are predictors of adherence to medical management in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(8):1233–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lopez A, Billioud V, Peyrin-Biroulet C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Adherence to Anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(7):1528–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Barnes EL, Loftus EV Jr, Kappelman MD. Effects of race and ethnicity on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(3):677–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen C, Hartzema AG, Xiao H, Wei YJ, Chaudhry N, Ewelukwa O, Glover SC, Zimmermann EM. Real-world pattern of biologic use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: treatment persistence, switching, and importance of concurrent immunosuppressive therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(8):1417–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu H, MacIsaac D, Wong JJ, Sellers ZM, Wren AA, Bensen R, Kin C, Park KT. Market share and costs of biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel disease in the USA. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47(3):364–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dalal SR, Cohen RD. What to do when biologic agents are not working in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015;11(10):657–65.

    Google Scholar 

  46. OptumTM. Unparalleled data and analytic expertise for a large-scale national study. [cited 18 Aug 2021]. Available from

Download references


The authors thank Priyanka Sharma and Salgo M.R. Elenjikamalil (Ph.D.), SIRO Clinpharm, Maharashtra, India for providing writing and editorial assistance.


This work was supported by Janssen Scientific Affairs (Titusville, NJ, USA). Medical writing support was provided by Priyanka Sharma and Salgo M.R. Elenjikamalil (Ph.D.), SIRO Clinpharm, Maharashtra, India, and was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZD, QC, ZF, and AP were involved in study design. ZD, QC, ZF, and AP were involved in the interpretation of the results. QC and ZF were responsible for the statistical analyses. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors meet International Committee of Medical Journal Editor (ICMJE) criteria, and all those who fulfilled those criteria are listed as authors. All authors provided direction and comments on the manuscript, made the final decision about where to publish these data, and approved submission to this journal.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aarti A. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of OPTUM data was reviewed by the New England Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was determined to be exempt from broad IRB approval, as this research project did not involve human subject research. Administrative permissions were not required to access the raw data. This is because our claims database is de-identified under the Expert Determination method consistent with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) standards. The Ethical Guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki were strictly followed. All study data were accessed with protocols compliant with US patient confidentiality requirements, including the HIPAA. As this study consisted of secondary data analyses of de-identified patient records, it does not constitute human subjects research and was exempt from Institutional Review Board registration and review requirements per US Federal Policy 45 CFR 46.102(f)(2). Furthermore, since this study used existing fully de-identified data and the investigators cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to subjects, it is exempt from all 45 CFR part 46 requirements. In this manuscript, we also report only aggregate-level statistics to ensure patient confidentiality.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

ZD, QC, ZF, and AP are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs (a Johnson & Johnson company) and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, Q., Ding, Z., Fu, A.Z. et al. Racial or ethnic differences on treatment adherence and persistence among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases initiated with biologic therapies. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 545 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Crohn’s disease
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Biologics
  • Adherence
  • Persistence