Skip to main content

I-125 seeds brachytherapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

Background

I-125 seeds brachytherapy (ISB) has been used to improve the clinical effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to appraise the safety and clinical efficacy of combined ISB and TACE for the treatment of subcapsular HCC.

Materials and methods

A retrospective investigative study extending from January 2017 to December 2020, involved individuals suffering from subcapsular HCC, who were subjected to TACE treatment with or without ISB in our center. The clinical effectiveness was compared between 2 groups.

Results

Sixty-four patients, in total, with subcapsular HCC had to undergo TACE with (n = 32) or without (n = 32) ISB in our center. After CT-guided ISB, only 2 (6.3%) patients experienced a self-limited pneumothorax. Combined treatment resulted in a significantly higher complete response (56.3% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.002) and total response (90.7% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.004) rates than that of TACE alone. In comparison to the TACE alone group, the median progression-free survival was substantially longer in the combined treatment group (11 months vs. 5 months, P = 0.016). Further, 15 and 28 patients in combined and TACE alone groups respectively died within the follow-up. The median OS was comparable between combined and TACE alone groups (22 months vs. 18 months, P = 0.529).

Conclusions

Combined TACE and ISB therapy is a safe treatment method for individuals suffering from subcapsular HCC. When compared, combined treatment had significantly enhanced clinical efficacy as a subcapsular HCC therapy, in comparison to TACE alone.

Peer Review reports

Background

Approximately 90% of primary liver cancers comprise hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and are evidently a major health issue around the world [1,2,3]. Despite the fact that surgical resection is the optimal treating pathway for HCC, in the majority of cases (> 60%), diagnosis takes place at the developed stage of the tumor when surgery is no longer suggested [4,5,6].

For advanced-stage HCC patients, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an efficacious therapeutic strategy, with a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 52.6–57.5% [7,8,9,10]. Several treatments which include percutaneous ablation, radiotherapy, or systemic therapy (Sorafenib or immunotherapy) have the potential to improve the clinical effectiveness of TACE alone, and the 1-year OS rate of combined treatments can reach up to a maximum of 71.9–77.5% [7,8,9,10].

Percutaneous ablation is recommended currently for small HCCs and is considered as an adequate alternative treatment to surgery [11]. However, the utilization of percutaneous ablation in subcapsular HCC is usually rendered unsafe on account of its proximity to the diaphragm and bowel and adjacent viscera [12]. Therefore, some researchers used I-125 seeds brachytherapy (ISB) instead of percutaneous ablation for the subcapsular HCC [13]. At present, the number of investigations, concerning the utilization of TACE with ISB for subcapsular HCC is still limited.

The main objective of the current works is the evaluation of the clinical safety and effectiveness of combined TACE and ISB for subcapsular HCC.

Methods

Patients selection

This survey is a retrospective investigation from a single-center and it was confirmed through our Institutional Review Board. However, informed satisfaction from the patient was waived. From January 2017 to December 2020, patients suffering from subcapsular HCC were given TACE with or without ISB in the center (Fig. 1). The inclusion criteria comprised: (a) a diagnosis of subcapsular HCC; (b) inoperable cases or the patients who refused the surgical treatment; (c) number of tumors in individual patient ≤ 3; (d) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0–2; and (e) Child–Pugh liver function class A or B. The exclusion criteria comprised: (a) patients who had undergone liver surgery, chemoradiotherapy, TACE, or ablation previously; (b) diffused HCC; (c) for the individuals having multiple HCCs if the subcapsular HCC was not the dominant tumor, they were excluded; (d) complete obstruction of the portal vein; and (e) life expectancy < 3 months.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flowchart of this study

Diagnosis.

Confirmation of HCC diagnosis was on the basis of Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update [14]. The diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging based on the typical enhancement pattern (arterial hypervascularity and venous/delayed phase washout). Biopsy was performed if the imaging findings were equivocal. Accordingly, When the distance between tumor margin and the liver surface was < 10 mm, it was referred to as subcapsular HCC [12]. Subcapsular HCCs can be divided into exophytic and non-exophytic. The exophytic tumor was defined as the tumor protrusion beyond the liver surface [12].

TACE treatment

Using local anesthesia, the TACE procedures were carried out under fluoroscopic guidance. The right femoral artery was punctured. The tumor blood supply arteries were confirmed via angiography using a 5F catheter (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). A roadmap was established based on the intraoperative angiography. Then, the 2.7F micro-catheter (Terumo) was inserted via the 5F catheter and placed into the segmental or subsegmental hepatic arteries supplying blood to the tumors under the guidance of the roadmap. TACE was performed with the mixture of 5-fluorouracil (150 mg), mitomycin C (10 mg), epirubicin (50 mg), and lipiodol (10–20 ml). A gelatin sponge was employed initially to embolize the arteriovenous fistula, in cases where it was present. After TACE, angiography was carried out again to confirm whether there was residual tumor staining.

Treatment planning of ISB

ISB was usually performed 2 weeks after TACE. Each I-125 seed (4.5-mm long, 0.8-mm diameter) emitted a 35.5-keV low-energy γ-rays, having a half-life equivalent to 59.6-day, an activity of 0.6–0.8 mCi (Chinese Atomic Energy Science Institution, Beijing, China), and an incipient rate of 7 cGy/h.

A 16-row CT scan (Philips, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) was used to assess HCC prior to ISB. The CT imaging information was sent to a treatment-planning system (TPS; BT-RSI; YuanBo, Beijing, China). Tumors were contoured manually on all axial CT slices and the gross tumor volume (GTV) was assessed by the TPS system. The prescribed dose was 100–140 Gy. The TPS automatically evaluated the estimated number of I-125 seeds and optimized the related spatial distribution. The planning goal was that 90% of the GTV could achieve the prescribed dose. The curves of isodose and histogram of dose-volume were shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The a isodose curves plotted by the TPS and b dose-volume histogram

CT-guided ISB

The ISB was carried out under CT guidance with local anesthesia. The tumor location determined the position of the patients. One or multiple 18G needles were used to insert the I-125 seeds. The needle pathways were designed by the TPS system. When the needles were embedded into the tumor, the I-125 seeds were placed into the tumor according to the treatment plan. The I-125 seeds were implanted one after another, with a 5–10 mm space between seeds. The needles were withdrawn so that the I-125 seeds were dropped along the needle pathways. The distribution of the seeds was confirmed by an additional CT scan. The flowchart of the CT-guided ISB procedures was shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The flowchart of the CT-guided ISB procedures

Follow-up

The follow-up was conducted at 1, 3, and every 3 months after treatment. The follow-up was concluded at death or till a point of time in December 2021. The investigations included in the follow-up were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or abdominal contrast-enhanced CT, routine blood examination, liver function test, and tumor marker test (AFP, CEA, CA125, and CA199). Repeat TACE was performed, if there was CT/MRI enhanced area in the treated tumor.

Treatment response

Treatment response was used to assess the short-term effectiveness [4], and it was appraised in compliance with the altered response assessment criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) [15].

Complete response (CR): the disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions.

Partial response (PR): Minimum of 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (improvement in the arterial phase) target lesions, considering the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions as reference.

Stable disease (SD): any cases that do not qualify for either progressive disease or partial response.

Progressive disease (PD): an improvement of the minimum of 20% in the sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions, considering the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (improving) target lesions recorded since the starting point of treating procedure, as reference.

The time from the first TACE process until death from any cause or the last follow-up was referred to as overall survival (OS). The absence of any new intrahepatic or extrahepatic lesions, local progression, or death was classified as progression-free survival (PFS) [16].

Statistical assessment

SPSS v16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The χ2 test or Fisher exact test were employed for the evaluation of the categorical variables and the t-test was employed for the evaluation of the continuous variables. To compare the rates of OS and PFS between groups, the curves of Kaplan–Meier and the test of log-rank were made use of. A multivariate Cox regression assessment was employed for identifying variables linked to OS and PFS, with all variables with a P < 0.1 in initial univariate analyses being included in the final multivariate model. P < 0.05 was set as the level of statistical significance.

Results

Patients

A total of 64 patients with subcapsular HCC underwent TACE with (n = 32) or without (n = 32) ISB in our center (Table 1). All HCCs were diagnosed based on the typical imaging findings. Therefore, biopsy was not required. Except for the rate of HBsAg (+), the other baseline parameters were comparable among the two groups. All patients with HBsAg (+) received antiviral therapy. Furthermore, 4 cases in the combined group had extra-hepatic metastasis, which included lung metastasis (n = 3) and adrenal metastasis (n = 1). Four and 3 cases in combined and TACE alone groups had PVTT, respectively, and all of the 7 cases had the branched PVTT. During the follow-up, the mean cycles of TACE were 2.8 and 5.0 in the combined and TACE alone groups, accordingly (P = 0.001).

Table 1 Patient characteristics in 2 groups

In the combination group, the 32 individuals were inserted with 1560 I-125 seeds (mean 48.8 seeds/patient). Figure 4 showed the procedure of the combined treatments. After CT-guided ISB, only 2 (6.3%) patients experienced a self-limited pneumothorax.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A 78-year-old female with subcapsular HCC underwent combined TACE and ISB treatment. Preoperative a axial and b coronal contrast-enhanced MRI showed the subcapsular HCC (arrows). c The procedure of TACE (arrow). d The ISB was performed by the CT guidance. e Postoperative contrast-enhanced MRI showed the shrinkage of the tumor with no intratumoral arterial enhancement (arrow). It could be considered as CR

Treatment response

Table 2 demonstrates the treatment response results between the two groups. Combined treatment resulted in a considerably higher CR rate than the TACE alone did (56.3% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.002). Besides, the total response rate was notably greater in the combination treatment group compared with that in TACE alone group (90.7% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.004).

Table 2 Comparison of treatment response between 2 groups

Survival

The median PFS was substantially longer in the combined treatment group in comparison to that in TACE alone group (11 months vs. 5 months, P = 0.016, Fig. 5a). The respective 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 44.8%, 18.7%, and 18.7% in combined group and 21.9%, 12.5%, and 0.0% in TACE alone group, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The comparison of PFS a and OS b period based on all patients

Fifteen and 28 patients belonging respectively to the combined and TACE alone groups expired during follow-up. In all patients, the precise cause of death was tumor progression. The median OS was comparable between combined and TACE alone groups (22 months vs. 18 months, P = 0.529, Fig. 5b). The respective 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 80.6%, 38.4%, and 27.4% in combined group and 78.1%, 37.5%, and 15.6% in TACE alone group.

Based on the BCLC stage A patients, the median PFS (15 months vs. 11 months, P = 0.478, Fig. 6a) and OS (25 months vs. 25 months, P = 0.910, Fig. 6b) were both comparable between the two groups. Based on the BCLC stage B/C patients, the median PFS (8 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.001, Fig. 7a) was significantly longer in the combined group, while the OS (18 months vs. 16 months, P = 0.538, Fig. 7b) was comparable between the two groups.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The comparison of PFS a and OS b period based on BCLC stage A patients

Fig. 7
figure 7

The comparison of PFS a and OS b period based on BCLC stage B/C patients

Predictors of survival.

Based on univariate Cox-regression analysis, combined portal vein tumor thrombi (PVTT, P = 0.002), Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B (P = 0.009), BCLC stage C (P < 0.001), and use of ISB (P = 0.022) were correlated with the PFS period. Based on multivariate Cox-regression analysis, BCLC stage B was the predictor of a shorter PFS period (P = 0.002, Table 3). The utilization of ISB was the predictor of a longer PFS period (P = 0.003, Table 3). Target treatment was not the predictor of longer PFS period (P = 0.223) on the basis of the univariate Cox-regression assessment.

Table 3 Predictors of progression-free survival

Regarding the univariate Cox-regression evaluation, tumor diameter (P = 0.008), combined PVTT (P = 0.002), BCLC stage B (P = 0.016), BCLC stage C (P < 0.001), and extra-hepatic metastasis (P = 0.005) were correlated with the OS period. Based on multivariate Cox-regression assessment, combined PVTT (P = 0.024) was the only predictor of a shorter OS period (Table 4). Target treatment was not the predictor of longer OS period (P = 0.378) according the univariate Cox-regression assessment.

Table 4 Predictors of overall survival

Toxicity effects

The National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria grading version 2.0 was used as a reference for toxic effects [17]. Fever, vomit, and myelosuppression were the most common side effects. There existed no substantial discrepancies in rates of fever (43.8% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.802), vomit (37.5% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.599), and myelosuppression (28.1% vs. 28.1%, P = 1.000) between 2 groups.

Discussion

Treatment of subcapsular HCC is rather challenging due to its location [18,19,20]. Various segments including the caudate lobe and the posterosuperior segments are complicated to be resected laparoscopically [21]. Although TACE can treat HCC at any location via the hepatic artery approach, many supplementary treatments, which include percutaneous ablation and ISB, have been employed to prolong the OS and PFS following TACE [22, 23]. Percutaneous ablation has been documented to be effective and safe for treatment for subcapsular HCC [18,19,20]. Nevertheless, complications including right pleural effusion, transient lung change, right shoulder pain, diaphragmatic thickening, and subsegmental intrahepatic bile duct stricture have been frequently described [13].

The current work is based on an assessment of the safety and clinical efficacy of combined TACE and ISB for subcapsular HCC. First of all, only 2 patients (6.3%) experienced self-limited pneumothorax and this result suggests the safety of CT-guided ISB for subcapsular HCC. The complication rate in our study is comparable to other studies using percutaneous ablation for subcapsular HCC [18,19,20], where the mean complication rate was approximately 10.8%. However, to preserve the surrounding organ during percutaneous ablation for subcapsular HCC, the hydrodissection approach was commonly adopted [18]. ISB, unlike percutaneous ablation, does not necessitate this approach [13].

In this study, the CR rate was significantly greater in the combination group (P = 0.002), while the PR rates were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.606). Based on the result of PR rates, we found that TACE alone could effectively inhibit the tumor progression, while the CR rates indicated that ISB based on TACE can further kill the tumor cells. Furthermore, the total response rate of the combination group in this study (90.7%) was comparable to that (80.95%) in a previous study based on TACE and ISB used in combination for HCC [24].

PFS is a metric that measures the ability of long-term control. Our findings suggest that ISB could help TACE maintain long-term control. This could be because I-125 seeds emit gamma radiation, which can destroy cycle-sensitive cells, and low-dose radiation has an effect on tumor cell distribution, making HCC cells more sensitive to chemotherapy and boosting long-term efficacy. ISB, on the other hand, had no effect on PFS in individuals with BCLC stage A HCC. The possible reasons for this result are (a) the sample size is small; (b) TACE alone may also effectively control the smaller or early-stage HCC [25].

The 1-year and 3-year OS rates (80.6% and 27.4%) after combined treatment in our study are roughly comparable to those (87.9% and 46.7%) in a previous study regarding the use of TACE and ISB in combination for HCC [22]. Furthermore, these rates are also comparable to the study regarding TACE with microwave ablation (89.5% and 32.6%) for HCC [26]. Our comparative results, on the other hand, showed that ISB did not improve the OS period following TACE. This result could be ascribed to the limited sample size. Moreover, this result could mainly be explained by the fact that the TACE cycles were substantially greater in the TACE alone group (P = 0.001). Because the TACE alone group had a lower CR rate and higher tumor progression rate, additional TACE cycles were conducted timely to control the tumor progression. In other words, we can expect ISB to aid in the reduction of TACE use. Furthermore, when paired with PVTT, it was observed to be associated with a shorter OS time. PVTT is frequently associated with a bad prognosis as a result of tumor growth, as well as decreased portal circulation and elevated portal pressure [16].

Fever, vomit, and myelosuppression are all prominent adverse consequences of TACE. ISB did not increase the toxicity of TACE, as suggested by our findings. These results could be ascribed to the usage of TPS prior to ISB. The number and distribution of the I-125 seeds were designed by TPS and the radiation dose to the adjacent non-tumor tissues was controlled to a minimum [22].

At present, transarterial radio-embolization (TARE) using the Yttrium-90 (Y90) has been broadly employed for treating inoperable HCC and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) [27,28,29]. Based on the results of a recent meta-analysis, compared to TACE, TARE could provide the similar good outcomes with the significant lower adverse event rates for patients with ICC [29]. A randomized controlled trial showed that TARE could provide significant longer time-to-progression than TACE did (26 months vs. 6.8 months, P = 0.012) for patients with HCC [30]. However, the clinical effectiveness between ISB and TARE should be further confirmed.

The study has a few limitations. To begin, this is entirely a retrospective analysis which usually results in a high risk of selection, comparability, and exposure bias. Second, the rates of HBsAg (+) were not comparable between the two groups. Therefore, we performed the Cox-regression analyses and found that HBsAg (+) was not associated to the survival period. Despite the fact that this item was not linked to PFS or OS, this finding enhanced the likelihood of bias. Third, because the sample size of BCLC stage C patients was rather limited, we did not estimate the PFS and OS for these patients. Hence there is a definite need for more well-designed prospective investigations with relatively large sample sizes.

Conclusion

Briefly, combination of TACE and ISB is a safe treatment method for subcapsular HCC. The clinical efficacy of combination treatment was significantly superior to TACE alone in the treatment of subcapsular HCC.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BCLC:

Barcelona clinic liver cancer

CT:

Computed tomography

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

ISB:

I-125 seeds brachytherapy

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OS:

Overall survival

PFS:

Progression-free survival

PVTT:

Portal vein tumor thrombi

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

TARE:

Transarterial radio-embolization

References

  1. Hartke J, Johnson M, Ghabril M. The diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2017;34:153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark T, Maximin S, Meier J, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: review of epidemiology, screening, imaging diagnosis, response assessment, and treatment. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015;44:479–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:329–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang H, Yang A, Zhang J. Efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with 125I seed implantation and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J BUON. 2020;25:952–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruix J, Sherman M. Practice guidelines committee, american association for the study of liver diseases. Manag Hepatocell Carcinoma Hepatol. 2005;42:1208–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu FX, Chen J, Bai T, et al. The safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib and sorafenib mono-therapy in patients with BCLC stage B/C hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang Z, Zou R, Zheng Y, et al. Lipiodol deposition in portal vein tumour thrombus predicts treatment outcome in HCC patients after transarterial chemoembolisation. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:5752–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon SM, Lim YS, Won HJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma invading the portal vein: long-term patient outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:2004–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Niu ZJ, Ma YL, Kang P, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization compared with conservative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: using a new classification. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2992–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiang X, Lau WY, Wu ZY, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization versus best supportive care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1460–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiina S, Sato K, Tateishi R, et al. Percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of various ablation techniques and surgery. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:4756147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Worakitsitisatorn A, Lu DS, Lee MW, et al. Percutaneous thermal ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas: influence of tumor-surface contact and protrusion on therapeutic efficacy and safety. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:1813–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Zhang L, Xie Q, et al. 125I seeds implantation for treating residual hepatocellular carcinoma located beneath the diaphragm after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Brachytherapy. 2019;18:420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruix J, Sherman M. American association for the study of liver diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:52–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Li H, Hu H, et al. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with either 125I seed implantation or apatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A retrospective comparative study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16:1691–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaba H, Fukuda H, Yamamoto S, et al. Reliability at the national cancer institute-common toxicity criteria version 2.0. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004;31:1187–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu F, Yu X, Cheng Z, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for subcapsular and nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2017;91:93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, He J, Li T, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and postoperative outcomes of hydrodissection-assisted microwave ablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:2161–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang F, Ma J, Wu L, et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 57 cases. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020;26:34–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Araki K, Kubo N, Watanabe A, et al. Systematic review of the feasibility and future of laparoscopic liver resection for difficult lesions. Surg Today. 2018;48:659–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li M, He J, Pan M, et al. Iodine-125 implantation plus transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma of 3–5cm: A propensity score matching study. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:1082–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song MJ, Bae SH, Lee JS, et al. Combination transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Intern Med. 2016;31:242–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng Y, Mao Y, Shi Z, et al. Observation of therapeutic effect of 125I seed implantation combined with chemotherapy and antiviral therapy on HBV-related liver cancer. J BUON. 2019;24:1414–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003;37:429–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng L, Li HL, Guo CY, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and prognostic factors of transarterial chemoembolization plus microwave ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization alone in patients with a large solitary or multinodular hepatocellular carcinomas. Korean J Radiol. 2018;19:237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bargellini I, Mosconi C, Pizzi G, et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results of a multicenter retrospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43:1305–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saini A, Wallace A, Alzubaidi S, et al. History and evolution of yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Med. 2019;8:55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mosconi C, Solaini L, Vara G, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-a systemic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44:728–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Salem R, Gordon AC, Mouli S, et al. Y90 radioembolization significantly prolongs time to progression compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:1155-1163.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971716).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JHG designed this work. FLG, YW, and XZH collected the clinical data. TFP and FLG performed the statistical analyses. FLG wrote this article. Final manuscript was approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-He Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This single-center study was approved by Ethics Committee of Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital, Medical College of Southeast University. Written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature. All methods were carried out in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

The relevant patients provided informed consent for publication of the images in Fig. 4.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, FL., Wang, Y., Huang, XZ. et al. I-125 seeds brachytherapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02356-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02356-0

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Subcapsular
  • I-125 seed
  • Transarterial chemoembolization