Skip to main content

Gallbladder-preserving polypectomy for gallbladder polyp by embryonic-natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery with a gastric endoscopy

Abstract

Background and aims

Cholecystectomy is performed for most gallbladder polyps (GPs). However, cholecystectomy results concerning complications in some patients. For benign GPs, adoption of gallbladder-preserving surgery is worth to recommend. We describe our experiences performing gallbladder-preserving polypectomy for GPs by embryonic-natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) with a gastric endoscopy.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients with GPs who underwent gallbladder-preserving polypectomy by E-NOTES with a gastric endoscopy from April 2018 to September 2019 in our hospital. The operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, intraoperative and postoperative complications, gallbladder emptying function were obtained and analyzed.

Results

The procedure was performed successfully in all 12 patients with 5 cases of single polyp and 7 cases of multiple polyps. The range of GPs size was 2 mm to 15 mm. The mean operation time was (95.33 ± 23.08) minutes (55–135 min). There were no adverse events including heavy bleeding, mortality and conversion to open surgery during operation. All patients were discharged in 4–5 days after surgery without postoperative complications such as delayed bleeding, fever, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscess and abdominal wall incisional hernia. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperation who had almost no visible incision on the umbilical region, no recurrent GPs. The gallbladder emptying function decreased one month after surgery, and gradually improved 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Conclusion

E-NOTES gallbladder-preserving polypectomy is a safe and effective option for patients with GPs and is close to scar-free surgery which can be performed in routine clinical practice.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Gallbladder polyps (GPs) are one of the most universal biliary diseases which are described as the gallbladder mucosa lesion protrudes into the gallbladder cavity. The estimated prevalence of GPs in adults ranges from 0.3 to 12.3% in varying parts of the world [1] and were identified in 6.9% in the Chinese population [2]. GPs can be divided into non-neoplastic polyps (including cholesterol polyps, inflammatory polyps, gallbladder adenomyomatosis) and neoplastic polyps (benign ones including adenoma, leiomyoma, lipoma, etc. malignant ones including adenocarcinoma) according to the pathological findings [3]. At present, the recognized risk factors for malignant GPs are: single polyp diameter more than 10 mm, combined with gallstone, fast-growing polyps, broad basal polyp, porcelain gallbladder, and patients older than 50 years, etc. [4].

GPs are often asymptomatic and diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound. However, it is still difficult to judge the benign and malignant polyps by abdominal ultrasound [5, 6]. Therefore, it is difficult to decide whether cholecystectomy is necessary for GPs. In fact, less than 5% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for GPs have malignant lesions [7]. Pathological examination is still the gold standard for diagnosing the nature of GPs. At present, cholecystectomy is the main method for the treatment of GPs to obtain pathological diagnosis. However, surgical complications include bile duct injury, vascular injury, chronic diarrhea, etc., and the loss of postoperative gallbladder physiological function seriously affects the quality of life of patients [8, 9]. These shortcomings raise many specialists’ concerns about conservation of the gallbladder.

With the rise of minimally invasive endoscopic technology, the concept of embryonic-natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) has been put forward and continuously developed [10]. Its route is through the umbilicus, the natural orifice of the embryo. Hence the incisions are hidden in the umbilicus, there is a "nearly scar-free" post-surgical bellybutton. In this study, we reported our initial experiences of E-NOTES for the treatment of GPs with gallbladder-preserving polypectomy.

Materials and methods

Subjects

12 patients with GPs at the 900th Hospital of PLA between April 2018 and September 2019 were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included patients with (a) aged 18–70 years; (b) abdominal color ultrasound suggested GPs, and the maximum size of GPs > 5 mm; (c) gallbladder wall thickness less than 4 mm; (d) accepting E-NOTES gallbladder-preserving polypectomy. Exclusion criteria included patients with (a) complicated with gallstone, acute or chronic cholecystitis, (b) no functional or malfunctioning gallbladder, (c) porcelain gallbladder, (d) poor diabetes control, (e) suffering from malignant tumors, severe heart, liver, or renal dysfunction and history of gastrointestinal surgery, (f) pregnancy and lactation, (g) psychiatric disorders.

Surgical equipment

The instruments used in this study included gastric endoscopy (GIF-H260, Q260; Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), transparent cap (Olympus Medical Systems), insulation-tipped knife (KD-650L; Olympus Medical Systems), Hook knife (KD-620QR; Olympus Medical Systems), polypectomy snares (STIFFBx/10; Boston Scientific Corporation), hot biopsy forceps (KD-410LR; Olympus Medical Systems), hemostatic clamp (Boston Scientific Corporation), VIO 300D device (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Germany), homemade Trocar. The gastroscope was cleaned and disinfected by the disinfectant center and then sterilized with ethylene oxide.

Operative technique

Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed supine. After the operating area was disinfected and covered with towel, a 10-mm trocar was inserted through the umbilicus (Fig. 1), and then the gastric endoscopy with a transparent cap was introduced to observe the abdominal cavity adhesions and the appearance of the gallbladder (Fig. 2). The gallbladder fundus was cut by IT or Hook knife (Fig. 3), and bile spilled out and was withdrawn. After entering the gallbladder cavity, treatment instruments were selected according to the size and morphology of GPs (Fig. 4). For diameter polyps larger than 5 mm, a snares or argon plasma coagulation (APC) was selected to completely remove the GPs (Figs. 5, 6,); for small polyps less than or equal to 5 mm, biopsy forceps were used to bite them (Fig. 7). The gallbladder cavity was flushed with normal saline to explore the gallbladder and eliminate the residual polyps. The gallbladder wall incision was closed with hemostatic clamps (Fig. 8). The abdominal cavity was rinsed with normal saline (Fig. 9). Finally, the umbilical incision was cosmetically closed (Fig. 10).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The gastric endoscopy was introduced into the abdominal cavity through a 10-mm homemade trocar

Fig. 2
figure 2

The appearance of the gallbladder under direct vision of the gastric endoscopy

Fig. 3
figure 3

The gallbladder fundus was cut by IT or hook knife

Fig. 4
figure 4

An endoscopic image of the gallbladder cavity and the different size and morphology of GPs

Fig. 5
figure 5

A snares was selected to completely remove the GPs (diameter > 5 mm)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) for the treatment of GPs

Fig. 7
figure 7

Biopsy forceps were used to bite the GPs (diameter ≤ 5 mm)

Fig. 8
figure 8

The gallbladder wall incision was closed with hemostatic clamps

Fig. 9
figure 9

The abdominal cavity was rinsed with normal saline

Fig. 10
figure 10

The umbilical incision was cosmetically closed

Measurement of the gallbladder-emptying function

The gallbladder-emptying function was measured by abdominal ultrasound before surgery and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery which was performed on an empty stomach and 45 ~ 60 min after the fat meal (two fried eggs) to record the length, width and height of the gallbladder. The calculation formula of gallbladder volume is as follows: gallbladder volume (cm3) = π/6 × length × width × height (cm) [11, 12]. The gallbladder-emptying function was expressed by the gallbladder emptying index: (fasting volume—postprandial volume)/ fasting volume × 100%. The gallbladder-emptying function was good, acceptable, poor respectively when the gallbladder emptying index were more than 50%, 33.3% to 50%, less than 33.3% [13].

Postoperative management and follow-up

The postoperative complications and vital signs were closely observed. Fluidized diet was administered 24 h after operation. Follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation included evaluation of clinical symptoms, umbilicus incision, recurrent GPs, and gallbladder-emptying function.

Statistical analysis

Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Matched-pair analysis was used to compare the data of gallbladder volume and gallbladder-emptying function before and after surgery. SPSS 26.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to analyze all the study data and draw the linear graph.

Results

Operative procedures

In this study, there were 12 patients, including 8 males and 4 females, with a median age of (47.33 ± 8.12) years (36–62 years). All the operations were successful, and the mean procedure time was (95.33 ± 23.08) minutes (55–135 min). None of patients had heavy bleeding, mortality and conversion to open surgery during operation. There was no discomfort in fluidized diet on the first day after surgery and no postoperative complications such as delayed bleeding, fever, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscess and umbilical incisional hernia. The umbilical incision healed well (Fig. 11) and the patients were usually discharged 4–5 days later.

Fig. 11
figure 11

The umbilical incision healed well after operation

Characteristics of GPs

The range of GPs size was 2 mm to 15 mm, 5 cases were single polyps and 7 cases were multiple polyps. Postoperative polyp pathology confirmed that 10 cases were cholesterol polyps (Fig. 12), one of them with gallbladder adenomyosis; 2 cases were chronic mucositis (Fig. 13); no case was tubular adenomas.

Fig. 12
figure 12

cholesterol polyps.

Fig. 13
figure 13

gallbladder adenomyosis

Follow-up

All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperation. Follow-up showed no postoperative discomfort and no visible incision on the umbilical region in all patients, all patients were satisfied with the cosmetic results of the incision and did not experience incision pain. The GPs did not recur through abdominal ultrasonography. Hemostatic clamps did not come off through abdominal CT examination (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14
figure 14

CT indicated the retention of titanium clip hemostatic clamps 12 months after surgery

Gallbladder-emptying function

All patients had good preoperative gallbladder emptying function (gallbladder emptying index 57.37 ± 3.93%). There was no significant difference in the fasting gallbladder volume at pre-operation and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperation (P > 0.05). The postprandial gallbladder volume increased significantly 1 month postoperation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that pre-operation (P = 0.00); the gallbladder emptying index decreased 1 month postoperation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that pre-operation (P = 0.00); the gallbladder emptying index increased 3 months postoperation and thereafter. The gallbladder emptying index reached 56.83 ± 2.83% 12 months postoperation, and there was no significant difference compared with that pre-operation (P = 0.53) (Table 1) (Fig. 15).

Table 1 Comparison of gallbladder-emptying function before and after operation
Fig. 15
figure 15

Gallbladder-emptying function before and after operation linear graph

Discussion

Some studies have found that gallbladder adenoma can develop into gallbladder adenocarcinoma, which is a recognized precancerous lesion [14, 15]. Gallbladder cancer is associated with a poor prognosis that the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, the prognosis of early gallbladder cancer is significantly better than that of late gallbladder cancer [16]. So early diagnosis and early treatment is particularly important. The European guidelines recommend cholecystectomy if the diameter of GPs is greater than or equal to 10 mm [17]. However, the histology of GPs are mainly cholesterol polyps, and a few are inflammatory polyps, adenomyomas, adenomas, etc. [4]. In our study, cholesterol polyps confirmed by postoperative pathology accounted for 83.3% (10/12) of the polyp detection rates. With the reported malignant change rate of GPs at just 0.57% [18], the main surgical treatment for the diameter of GPs ≥ 10 mm consists of wide surgical and is contentious. Gallbladder is an important digestive organ of human body, which has the functions of concentrating bile, regulating bile duct pressure and regulating immunity. Blind cholecystectomy may lead to postoperative complications such as dyspepsia, alkaline reflux gastritis, colon cancer and affects patients' quality of life [19,20,21]. Therefore, it is necessary to find a more suitable way for the treatment of GPs.

In our study, we performed new-style E-NOTES gallbladder-preserving surgery for polyps which has its own unique advantages. Firstly, it maximizes the retention of the functional gallbladder and reduces the risk of potential cholecystectomy and postoperative biliary dysfunction. Secondly, the lesion can be completely removed to reduce gallbladder cancer risk, and the pathological diagnosis of polyps can be obtained to develop further treatment or follow-up strategies. Thirdly, compared with traditional laparoscopic-assisted gallbladder-preserving polypectomy [13, 22, 23], the main advantage of E-NOTES is that the umbilical cord is the weakest part of the abdominal wall, and transumbilical puncture can not only reduce the injury of the abdominal wall, but also relieve the pain of the surgical wound. Furthermore, the 2–4 incisions in the abdomen of the traditional laparoscopic surgery can be transformed into a small incision of 10 mm in the umbilical cord. With few scars on the body surface after the operation, E-NOTES achieve a more minimally invasive and more cosmetic effect.

Whether or not the change of gallbladder function and the recurrence of gallbladder polyps after surgery are worth exploring. We observed that the gallbladder emptying function decreased one month after surgery, and gradually improved 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Considering intraoperative incision of the gallbladder wall will cause postoperative gallbladder edema and scar formation one month after surgery, which may lead to postoperative adhesion and thus affect the gallbladder-emptying function. When gallbladder inflammation and edema gradually subsided 3 months after surgery, the gallbladder-emptying function gradually returned to normal. Moreover, no effect of hemostatic clamps on gallbladder-emptying function has been observed, and no discomfort caused by the presence of hemostatic clamps in the body has been found. There was no recurrence of GPs during one year follow-up.

As an emerging technique, there are no guidelines for E-NOTES gallbladder-preserving surgery for polyps, we have some tips from our practice's experience on how to operate it: Compared with laparoscopic technology, gastric endoscope lacks sufficient support and cannot be accurately oriented after entering the abdominal cavity. We used homemade super long Trocar to solve this problem. Trocar can guide and assist the endoscope to the operating position, and fix the endoscope to facilitate surgical operation. It should be noted that overshooting Trocar puncture has been widely recognized as a major cause of surgical injury in laparoscopic surgery [24]. Hence, Trocar should be punctured gently, so as to avoid intestinal damage or even severe bleeding caused by overexertion; Transparent cap-assisted endoscope should be used during the surgery, which can increase the visual field during the operation, have a fixed field of vision and leave operating space for the instruments [25], so that the gallbladder exploration and operation became smoothly; There are abundant blood vessels in the gallbladder wall, so blood vessels need to be identified carefully during the cutting the gallbladder wall with HOOK knife to avoid accidental injury of blood vessels and massive bleeding. When it comes to bleeding, hot biopsy forceps should be performed timely to hemostasis; 6 to 8 titanium clips were used to clamp the incision of the gallbladder wall, and the closure of the incision should be repeatedly checked to avoid bile leakage; Before gastroscope withdrawal from the abdominal cavity, the gallbladder and abdominal cavity should be flushed with normal saline to check whether there is incision bleeding or bile leakage; The operation is not easy, the operator should be familiar with the anatomy of gallbladder and methods of using endoscopic instruments, so the operator who have rich experience in endoscopic operation and solid surgical foundation could be competent for this operation.

The surgical indications need to be strictly grasped to reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. For example, recurrent cholecystitis may be due to abdominal adhesion, which could limit the surgical field of vision and lead to increased operational risk or even failure of operation. Therefore, preoperative evaluation of the patient's condition and the specific characteristics of the gallbladder is very important. In our study, the absence of serious complications intraoperatively and postoperatively was due partly to some strict control of indications.

The shortcomings of this study lie in the small sample size and short follow-up time, which makes it difficultly to predict the recurrence rate of GPs in the next few years.

In summary, E-NOTES gallbladder-preserving surgery provides an effective new option for GPs. The operation is minimally invasive, safe and has significant short-term efficacy, but its long-term efficacy still needs to be studied in a large sample.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Valibouze C, El Amrani M, Truant S, Leroy C, Millet G, Pruvot FR, et al. The management of gallbladder polyps. J Visc Surg. 2020;157(5):410–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin WR, Lin DY, Tai DI, Hsieh SY, Lin CY, Sheen IS, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for gallbladder polyps detected by ultrasonography among healthy Chinese: analysis of 34 669 cases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(6):965–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Myers RP, Shaffer EA, Beck PL. Gallbladder polyps: epidemiology, natural history and management. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16(3):187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matos AS, Baptista HN, Pinheiro C, Martinho F. Gallbladder polyps: how should they be treated and when? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010;56(3):318–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdullah AAN, Rangaraj A, Rashid M, Puw-Jones R, Rasheed A. Gallbladder polypoid lesions are inaccurately reported and undermanaged: a retrospective study of the management of gallbladder polypoid lesions detected at ultrasound in symptomatic patients during a 36-month period. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(6):e17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cocco G, Basilico R, Delli Pizzi A, Cocco N, Boccatonda A, D'Ardes D, et al. Gallbladder polyps ultrasound: what the sonographer needs to know. J Ultrasound. 2021.

  7. Bhatt NR, Gillis A, Smoothey CO, Awan FN, Ridgway PF. Evidence based management of polyps of the gall bladder: A systematic review of the risk factors of malignancy. Surgeon. 2016;14(5):278–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165(1):9–14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Prizment AE, Dhakal IB, Anderson KE. Cholecystectomy, gallstones, tonsillectomy, and pancreatic cancer risk: a population-based case-control study in Minnesota. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(9):2348–53.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai MM, Stein R, Rao P, Canes D, Aron M, Rao PP, et al. Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for advanced reconstruction: initial experience. Urology. 2009;73(1):182–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dodds WJ, Groh WJ, Darweesh RM, Lawson TL, Kishk SM, Kern MK. Sonographic measurement of gallbladder volume. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(5):1009–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Kang C, Feng T, Xue J, Shi K, Li T, et al. Effects of instrument settings on radiofrequency ultrasound local estimator images: a preliminary study in a gallbladder model. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(4):995–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Tan Y, Zhao G, Wang D, Ji Z. A new exploration for gallbladder polyps: gallbladder polypectomy by endolap technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(12):852–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Albores-Saavedra J, Chable-Montero F, Gonzalez-Romo MA, Ramirez Jaramillo M, Henson DE. Adenomas of the gallbladder. Morphologic features, expression of gastric and intestinal mucins, and incidence of high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2012;43(9):1506–13.

  15. Hundal R, Shaffer EA. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:99–109.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Blumgart LH. Gallbladder cancer: comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):557–69.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Dewhurst C, et al. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery - European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Eur Radiol. 2017;27(9):3856–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Elmasry M, Lindop D, Dunne DF, Malik H, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW. The risk of malignancy in ultrasound detected gallbladder polyps: A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2016;33(Pt A):28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schernhammer ES, Leitzmann MF, Michaud DS, Speizer FE, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, et al. Cholecystectomy and the risk for developing colorectal cancer and distal colorectal adenomas. Br J Cancer. 2003;88(1):79–83.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nusrat S, Mahmood S, Kastens D, Bielefeldt K. Cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia in gastroparesis: mimic or misfortune? South Med J. 2014;107(12):757–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher M, Spilias DC, Tong LK. Diarrhoea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and main determinants. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(6):482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang BF, Dang T, Wang QH, Chang ZH, Han WJ. Confocal laser endomicroscopy distinguishing benign and malignant gallbladder polyps during choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving polypectomy: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(24):6358–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li M, Wu H, Wei S. New-style laparoscope and endoscope cooperative gallbladder-preserving surgery for polyps. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016;26(2):91–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun J, Kotaro T. Design of a handheld trocar insertion device for laparoscopic surgery to avoid overshooting. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018;2018:1841–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang S, Wang J, Wang J, Zhong B, Chen M, Cui Y. Transparent cap-assisted endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper esophagus: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28(8):1339–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 82100687], Foreign Cooperation Project of Fujian Province [Grant No. 2019I0026], Science and Technology Project of Fujian Province [Grant Nos. 2018Y9116, 2020J05283] and Sailing Project of Fujian Medical University [Grant Nos. 2019QH1286, 2019QH1283], Outstanding Youth Training Program of 900TH Hospital [Grant No. 2019Q03].

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XJH, ZPC, XPZ, DZL, CSJ and GL participated in the acquisition of data; XJH, ZPC, DZL contributed to the manuscript drafting; XJH, XPZ, WW and DLL contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, as well as revise of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dong-Liang Li, Da-Zhou Li or Wen Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of 900TH Hospital of PLA. All methods of this study were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, XJ., Chen, ZP., Zeng, XP. et al. Gallbladder-preserving polypectomy for gallbladder polyp by embryonic-natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery with a gastric endoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02269-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02269-y

Keywords

  • Gallbladder polyp
  • Gallbladder-preserving polypectomy
  • Embryonic-natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery