- Case report
- Open Access
Magnifying endoscopic findings of early-stage poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma: a case report
BMC Gastroenterology volume 22, Article number: 148 (2022)
Colorectal poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma is rarely founded, especially in early-stage. Endoscopic features of early poorly differentiated colorectal cancer in magnifying endoscopy and chromoendoscopy haven’t been clarified.
A 49-year-old man was referred to our hospital for endoscopic treatment of a lateral spread tumor located in the rectum. We performed pre-resection endoscopic examination for the patient. In magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining, the lesion showed irregular microvessels and turned out to be poorly stained with predominantly non-structural pit pattern and a few roundish pits scattered on the surface. The histology revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the rectum invading the deep submucosal layer with negative lymphovascular invasion.
In this case report, we presented a case of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma detected at an early stage, showing interesting endoscopic findings in magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining.
Colorectal poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma is rarely founded, especially in early-stage. Most cases are detected at an advanced stage. In contrast to differentiated adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma often correlates with more aggressive biological behavior and is defined to be out-of-indication for endoscopic resection even in early-stage. Thus, the endoscopic diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma is important. Several endoscopic diagnostic classifications, including Kudo’s pit pattern classification, have been proposed and proved to distinguish colorectal cancer from non-neoplastic lesion or adenomas, as well as predict the depth of invasion in colorectal cancer. These diagnostic methods mostly focus on adenomas or differentiated adenocarcinomas. Perhaps due to its rarity, endoscopic features of early poorly differentiated colorectal cancer in magnifying endoscopy and chromoendoscopy haven’t been clarified. We here present a case of poorly differentiated colorectal cancer in the early-stage, showing specific findings in magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining.
A 49-year-old man was referred to our hospital for endoscopic therapy of a lateral spread tumor (LST) in the rectum in December 2019. At the previous hospital, biopsy histology showed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN). He had a three-week history of intermittent hematochezia. Family history for colorectal malignancy was negative. Physical examinations and routine laboratory tests revealed no abnormalities. Before resection, the patient underwent a magnifying chromoendoscopy examination. White-light endoscopy showed a superficially elevated lesion with slight depression in the central part, together with a reddish scar due to previous biopsy (Fig. 1A). The proximal part of the lesion presented with dense irregular microvessels in NBI mode (Fig. 1B). In magnifying endoscopy combined with 0.05% crystal violet staining, the proximal part showed irregular microvessels and turned out to be poorly stained with predominantly non-structural pit pattern, while the background mucosa showed regular Type-I pit patterns according to the Kudo’s classification (Fig. 1C). The distal part showed poorly stained with predominantly non-structural pit pattern, as well as a few small roundish pits scattered over the surface (Fig. 1D). The demarcation line between the lesion and normal mucosa was clearly visible. The whole lesion was lifted after submucosal injection and then resected completely (Fig. 2A) through endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Histology of the resected sample showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma invading into deep submucosal layer, with negative lymphovascular invasion and negative resection margin (Fig. 2B–D). P53 Immunohistochemistry staining showed complete absence in the cancerous area, which was predictive of TP53 truncated mutation. The MMR and APC genes showed intact expression, and β-catenin was expressed in the cellular membrane and cytoplasm (Fig. 3). KRAS gene mutation was conducted through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and also showed negative results. The patient then underwent additional surgery with lymph node dissection and final histology showed no residual tumor and no lymph node involvement. Follow-up surveillance colonoscopy and contrast enhanced computed tomography were performed for the patient in both the first year and second year after surgery. Neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis was detected over a two-year follow-up period.
Discussion and conclusions
Endoscopic resection is indicated for Tis or T1 tumors and pathological findings of unfavorable features including poorly differentiation and deep submucosal infiltration are considered to be non-curative . Magnifying endoscopy with chemical dye staining is usually conducted for pre-resection assessment in these cases. Kudo’s pit pattern classification, which shows the relationship between pit patterns and histology, is accurate in differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions and predicting tumor invasion depth. However, there has been no endoscopic diagnosing criteria in determining histologic type and tumor degree of differentiation for colorectal cancers. Reviewing the literature, we found a few case reports clarifying the endoscopic features of early-stage signet ring cell carcinoma in the colorectum [2,3,4]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports on the magnifying nor the chromoendoscopic findings of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Ohnita et al.  reported a primary signet ring cell carcinoma detected at an early stage. As they reported, the margin of the lesion showed IIIL and VI pit patterns, while the central part of the lesion showed VI pit pattern and dense mucus. Similar findings have been reported by Fu et al. . As they explained, signet ring cells preferred to produce mucus so such lesions were difficult to stain and showed avascular areas. However, there was no obvious mucus in our case and the whole lesion was also difficult to stain using either indigo carmine or crystal violet. In our case, the histology revealed a large number of tumor cells overgrowing and loss of normal surface epithelium and crypt-like structure in the mucosal layer. These findings may explain why the lesion was poorly stained. In some histologic sections we observed a few normal glandular ducts surrounded by tumors cells (Fig. 2D), which was consistent with the scattered roundish pits, i.e., Type-I pit patterns in magnifying endoscopy. Minamide et al.  reported similar findings in colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma but the lesion was residual after cold snare polypectomy and the diagnosing information may be not adequate. In Kudo’s classification, Type VN pit-pattern refers to loss or decrease of pits with an amorphous structure and indicates invasive submucosal colorectal cancer. Usually, Type VN pit-pattern co-exists with Vi pit-pattern or scratch sign. The lesion in our case presented poorly stained feature with predominately non-structural pit pattern and a few roundish pits scattered on the surface. No obvious Vi pit-pattern or scratch sign was found. These features were different from those of typical Type VN pit-pattern in Kudo’s classification. We confused at the failing to stain the lesion in the beginning and we repeated several times and the outcomes turned out to be the same. Besides the poorly stained feature, the proximal part of the lesion showed irregular microvessels similar to corkscrew vessels which indicated poorly differentiated cancer in the stomach.
This was the first time we encountered with early poorly differentiated colorectal cancer and due to the lack of adequate knowledge, we initially performed endoscopic submucosal dissection for the patient. Non-curative endoscopic treatment resulted in increases in time and cost and decreased patient’s satisfaction. From our case, we suppose that poorly stained features with predominantly non-structural pit pattern in magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining may be related to poorly differentiation and thus be inappropriate for endoscopic resection. More researches are needed to make a definite conclusion.
At the same time, we also analyzed the molecular features of the lesion. Colorectal cancers are heterogenous at the genetic level and develop via accumulation of genetic molecular alterations, in which APC, KRAS, TP53 mutations are mostly founded. Several pathways have been proposed for the development and progression of colorectal cancer, including the widely accepted adenoma-carcinoma sequence, the serrated neoplasia pathway, and de-novo carcinogenesis . By definition, de-novo lesions are characterized by the lack of any adenomatous remnant. In our case, the lesion presented with nonpolypoid growth pattern and no adenomatous remnant was founded. Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of the lesion implied p53 mutation, without any of APC, β-catenin, or KRAS mutation. Thus, we suppose that the cancerous lesion in our case is associated with p53 mutation, in accordance with molecular changes of de-novo colorectal cancers.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Lateral spread tumor
High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
Narrow band imaging
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Tumor protein 53
Mismatch repair proteins
MutS homolog 2
MutS homolog 6
MutL homolog 1
Postmeiotic segregation increased 2
Adenomatous polyposis coli
Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog
Polymerase chain reaction
Shinagawa T, Tanaka T, Nozawa H, et al. Comparison of the guidelines for colorectal cancer in Japan, the USA and Europe. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;2(1):6–12.
Ohnita K, Isomoto H, Akashi T, et al. Early stage signet ring cell carcinoma of the colon examined by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:86.
Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, et al. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon at early stage: a case report and a review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3446–9.
Minamide T, Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, et al. Early-stage primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the colon with magnifying endoscopic findings. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:529–31.
Papagiorgis PC, Zizi AE, Tseleni S, et al. Clinicopathological differences of colorectal cancers according to tumor origin: identification of possibly de novo lesions. Biomed Rep. 2013;1:97–104.
This work was supported by the Doctoral Program Foundation of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Grant No. SDFEYJBS2102), the Scientific Research Foundation of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Grant No. SDFEYQN1811), and the discipline construction and support project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Grant No. XKTJ-JD202006). Funding enabled immunohistochemical and genetic analysis of the resected sample. The funder did not influence the collection and analysis of data, the decision to publish and the writing of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Liu, Y. & Zhu, J. Magnifying endoscopic findings of early-stage poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02209-w
- Colorectal poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
- Magnifying endoscopy
- De-novo colorectal cancer
- Case report