Skip to main content
Download PDF

Colorectal cancer screening using a stool DNA-based SDC2 methylation test: a multicenter, prospective trial

BMC Gastroenterology volume 21, Article number: 173 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global priority, with many countries conducting population-based CRC screening programs. Although colonoscopy is the most accurate diagnostic method for early CRC detection, adherence remains low because of its invasiveness and the need for extensive bowel preparation. Non-invasive fecal occult blood tests or fecal immunochemical tests are available; however, their sensitivity is relatively low. Syndecan-2 (SDC2) is a stool-based DNA methylation marker used for early detection of CRC. Using the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test, the sensitivity and specificity of SDC2 methylation in stool DNA for detecting CRC were previously demonstrated to be greater than 90%. Therefore, a larger trial to validate its use for CRC screening in asymptomatic populations is now required.

Methods

All participants will collect their stool (at least 20 g) before undergoing screening colonoscopy. The samples will be sent to a central laboratory for analysis. Stool DNA will be isolated using a GT Stool DNA Extraction kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Before performing the methylation test, stool DNA (2 µg per reaction) will be treated with bisulfite, according to manufacturer’s instructions. SDC2 and COL2A1 control reactions will be performed in a single tube. The SDC2 methylation test will be performed using an AB 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system. CT values will be calculated using the 7500 software accompanying the instrument. Results from the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test will be compared against those obtained from colonoscopy and any corresponding diagnostic histopathology from clinically significant biopsied or subsequently excised lesions. Based on these results, participants will be divided into three groups: CRC, polyp, and negative. The following clinical data will be recorded for the participants: sex, age, colonoscopy results, and clinical stage (for CRC cases).

Discussion

This trial investigates the clinical performance of a device that allows quantitative detection of a single DNA marker, SDC2 methylation, in human stool DNA in asymptomatic populations. The results of this trial are expected to be beneficial for CRC screening and may help make colonoscopy a selective procedure used only in populations with a high risk of CRC.

Trial registration: This trial (NCT04304131) was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on March 11, 2020 and is available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04304131?cond=NCT04304131&draw=2&rank=1.

Peer Review reports

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Studies estimate that more than 250,000 new cases of CRC and approximately 9000 CRC-related deaths will occur in 2020 in South Korea [2]. The mean 5-year survival rate for early-stage CRC can be as high as 90% but can be less than 10% if metastasis occurs [3]. Therefore, prevention and early detection of CRC has emerged as a significant global initiative, and many countries conduct population-based CRC screening programs [4]. Although colonoscopy is the most accurate diagnostic method for early CRC detection, adherence remains very low due to the invasiveness of the procedure and the need for extensive bowel preparation [5, 6]. Sigmoidoscopy without bowel preparation can be used instead of colonoscopy, but it fails to detect abnormalities between the cecum and sigmoid colon. Digital rectal examination is the easiest diagnostic method, but it is only useful for detecting rectal cancer. Although computed tomography (CT) colonography is a non-invasive method that can visualize the proximal colon above the obstructing lesion in extraluminal views, it is not as accurate as colonoscopy [7]. Noninvasive fecal occult blood tests and fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are also available; however, their sensitivity is relatively low [8]. As an alternative to overcome these limitations, noninvasive, simple, and accurate molecular diagnostic tests using bodily fluids or feces have been gaining attention. These tests may be used for screening in patients reluctant to undergo screening colonoscopies, thereby allowing colonoscopy to be selectively performed in specific cases to detect early-stage CRC.

CRC arises from an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in the genome [9], including DNA methylation, in which methyl (CH3) groups are added to the 5′ position of cytosine (C) in the CpG island of a DNA molecule. Aberrant DNA methylation is associated with tumorigenesis of all types of cancer and has been established as one of the most common molecular alterations in CRC [10,11,12]. Therefore, specific DNA sites that are aberrantly methylated in colorectal neoplasms are well recognized as potential non-invasive molecular biomarkers for early CRC detection.

Regulatory regions in most genes consist of a sequence dense with CpG islands. If methylation occurs at the gene regulatory region, structural changes in chromatin, including in the CpG island, are induced, resulting in gene silencing [13]. Aberrant DNA methylation often occurs prior to genetic alterations. Thus, abnormal DNA methylation of certain genes may occur in progressive cancer, as well as in precancerous lesions (e.g., adenomatous polyps). Therefore, the presence of methylation of specific genes could be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of early-stage cancer [14]. Targeting cancer-specific methylated DNA for early cancer detection has many advantages, when compared with other known biomarkers [15].

In cancer tissues, abnormally methylated DNA sites are often shed into the blood and circulate in the form of cell-free DNA. In addition, exfoliated cells from the colonic mucosa are frequently present in feces. Because stool specimens from CRC patients usually contain exfoliated tumor cells, stool-derived DNA testing has emerged as a new strategy for the non-invasive detection of CRC and its precursor lesions [16]. We previously identified syndecan-2 (SDC2) as a potential stool-based DNA methylation marker for early CRC detection [17, 18]. Moreover, we reported that detecting SDC2 methylation has greater than 90% sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that this strategy would be an excellent non-invasive screening test for early diagnosis of CRC [19]. Here, we report the protocol of a larger trial to validate the use of SDC2 methylation detection in stool DNA as a screening method for CRC in asymptomatic populations.

Methods/design

Study design

This study is a prospective, multicenter trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a device (EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer, Genomictree, Daejeon, Korea) that allows for the quantitative detection of a single DNA marker, SDC2 methylation, in human stool DNA from asymptomatic individuals.

Before the study is initiated, the staff will be trained in all aspects of the study, including the assay procedure and instrument use. All eligible participants scheduled for colonoscopy for any reason will be enrolled in this trial. Before initiating bowel preparation for colonoscopy, all participants will collect at least 20 g of their stool using a plastic collection tube (50 mL) that is included in the kit. The following samples will be considered inappropriate for analysis and excluded: diarrhea or loose stool, quantities less than 20 g, samples collected during bowel preparation, and samples submitted over 2 weeks after collection. Samples collected by the participant for the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test will be sent to a central laboratory.

Stool DNA will be isolated using a GT Stool DNA Extraction kit (Genomictree, Inc, Daejeon, Korea) according to the following instructions:

  1. 1.

    All stool samples will be weighed and thoroughly homogenized in the preservative buffer using a multiple vortexer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After homogenization, 2–4 g equivalent of each stool sample will be collected and centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 2 min (HA-1000-3; Hanil Science Medical, Daejeon, Korea).

  2. 2.

    The supernatants will be discarded, and the pellet will be resuspended in 5.0 mL lysis buffer 1 (Genomictree, Inc, Daejeon, Korea) before incubating for 4 min at room temperature.

  3. 3.

    The samples will be centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 2 min, and the supernatant will be discarded before adding 2.0 mL lysis buffer 2 (Genomictree, Inc, Daejeon, Korea) and 30 μL proteinase K (0.4 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The samples will then be incubated at 70 °C for 10 min.

  4. 4.

    The samples will be centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and 0.75 mL supernatant will be added to the MaXtract High-Density tube (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Tris-saturated phenol–chloroform-isoamylalcohol (25:24:1 [v/v]; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) will then be added to the samples.

  5. 5.

    The samples will be thoroughly mixed for 1 min and then centrifuged in a microcentrifuge at maximum speed for 10 min. The supernatant (0.5 mL) will be transferred to a new tube, and 1/10 volume of 3 mol/L sodium acetate (pH 5.2; Welgene, Gyeongsan, Korea) and an equal volume of isopropanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) will be added to the sample.

  6. 6.

    Total nucleic acid will then be precipitated by centrifugation at maximum speed for 10 min. The DNA pellet will be washed with 1.0 mL 70% ethanol and dried. DNA concentration will be measured using the Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A solid phase magnetic bead-based stool DNA extraction method will also be available.

All information regarding the stool sample will be anonymized at the time of examination, treated as blind (single-blind) to the operator, and randomly assigned a unique number. The sample will then be sent to a central laboratory to test for SDC2 methylation. After study enrollment is complete, the methylation analysis results will be disclosed. The results and case report form (CRF) will be compared and analyzed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test. Residual stool samples may be archived for further research. Clinical data and samples will be maintained in a manner that preserves the anonymity of all subjects. Specimens will be stored for 5 years in the on-site biorepository of the central laboratory for potential use in future research. A schematic diagram of the trial workflow is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of the workflow of the trial

Full size image

The SDC2 methylation test will be performed according to the GT-CRC-UM-701 protocol (provided by the Sponsor) using the AB 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, 2 µg stool-derived genomic DNA will be chemically modified with sodium bisulfite using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (ZYMO Research, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For PCR analysis, SDC2 and COL2A1 control reactions will be performed twice in a single tube, as previously described [18, 19]. CT values will be calculated using the software accompanying the AB 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System. SDC2 methylation will be considered detected if CT is less than 40 cycles and not detected if CT is not measurable [17]. To maximize clinical sensitivity, SDC2 methylation will be considered positive if at least one of two PCR reactions has detectable methylated SDC2. Thus, samples will be categorized as positive if at least one of two reactions (1/2 algorithm) has detectable SDC2 and considered negative if SDC2 methylation is not measurable in both reactions. Our previous clinical study showed that the 95% limit of detection of the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer assay was 34.5 pg, corresponding to approximately 20 diploid genome copies [19]. Reproducibility and repeatability of the assay were acceptable, within a coefficient of variation of 5%. A total of 23 potential interfering substances, selected because of their clinical and dietary uses in South Korea, were confirmed to have no effect on the test performance of EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer assay. The assay also exhibited no cross-reactivity, even when excess amounts (105–106 genome copies) of bacterial and viral DNA were tested.

Results from the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test will be compared against those obtained by colonoscopy and any corresponding diagnostic histopathology from clinically significant biopsied or subsequently excised lesions. Based on these results, participants will be divided into three groups: CRC (group 1), polyp (group 2), and negative (control). The following clinical data will be recorded for the participants: sex, age, colonoscopy results, and clinical stage (in the CRC case group).

Participant selection criteria are as follows:

Inclusion Criteria

  1. 1.

    No symptoms suggestive of CRC.

  2. 2.

    The individual provides written informed consent.

  3. 3.

    The individual is at least 60 years old when they receive a colonoscopy.

  4. 4.

    Criteria for high-risk CRC patients younger than 60 years old who will participate in the trial are as follows:

  • At least one parent and/or sibling was diagnosed with colorectal cancer before age 55 years.

  • One of his/her parents, brothers, and sisters was diagnosed with colorectal cancer after age 55 years.

  • More than two of his/her parents, brothers, and sisters were diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

  • Previous polypectomy for pathologically confirmed adenoma (at least 1 year ago).

  • Occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease (diagnosed at least 15 years ago).

  1. 5.

    The individual provides more than 20 g of his/her stool for analysis.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. 1.

    Younger than 60 years and does not meet the aforementioned high-risk criteria.

  2. 2.

    Receiving or has received any type of therapy for CRC.

  3. 3.

    Less than 20 g of stool is provided for analysis.

  4. 4.

    Stool is considered inadequate for analysis (e.g., diarrhea or loose stool).

Objective

This trial aims to validate the use of SDC2 methylation in stool DNA for early detection of CRC in asymptomatic populations. The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer for detecting CRC.

Sample size calculation

Because this is not a randomized controlled trial, a statistical calculation for comparative analysis was not considered. Instead, we have assumed that the prevalence of colon polyps in Korea is 25% based on our previous pilot study, in which we found an 80% sensitivity of EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer for detecting CRC and polyps in 585 patients [19]. Therefore, at least 476 participants are needed to identify polyps or cancers. In our previous study, we intentionally controlled the types of cases (i.e., 245 CRC, 44 adenomatous polyps, and 245 negative colonoscopy results). However, we will enroll more than two times the number of cases (n = 1000) in this trial and specifically include asymptomatic participants who will undergo colonoscopy. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10%, 1112 participants will be enrolled in this trial.

Data collection and management

The authors will use an electronic CRF (Excel, Microsoft, USA) to record clinical data and information. Principal investigators or clinical research coordinators at each site will enter clinical data into the CRF. Approved researchers from the central data managing institution will manage the data and information. Only the principal investigator will be able to access the final trial dataset and analyze it. Personal information regarding the enrolled participants will remain anonymous for 5 years and deleted to protect confidentiality.

Drop-out

A participant can be removed from the trial for the following reasons:

  1. 1.

    Submission of an unacceptable stool sample

  2. 2.

    Refusal to participate for any reason

Statistical analysis

To calculate sensitivity and specificity, the test results will be denoted with dichotomous variables, namely “1” for methylation-positive individuals and “0” for methylation-negative individuals. Sensitivity and specificity for CRC detection, area under the curve (AUC) value, and 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis (SAS v.9.4). The cut-off value for CT will be less than 40, and the following endpoints will be assessed:

  • True positive (TP): SDC2 methylation-positive in CRC patients

  • True negative (TN): SDC2 methylation-negative in the control (negative) subjects

  • False-positive (FP): SDC2 methylation-positive in the control subjects

  • False-negative (FN): SDC2 methylation-negative in CRC patients

  • Sensitivity = 100 × TP/(TP + FN)

  • Specificity = 100 × TN/(TN + FP)

  • Negative predictive value (NPV) = TN/(TN + FN)

  • Positive predictive value (PPV) = TP/(TP + FP)

Safety evaluation and reporting of adverse effects

We anticipate no adverse events related to using the device in this trial.

Data monitoring

A committee will be organized for trial supervision. All members of the committee will be certified according to Good Clinical Practices at each institution. The committee will monitor all processes, including data collection, records, and management, as well as advise and request the principal investigator to alter plans if needed.

Protocol modification

If necessary, the protocol can be modified following agreement between the principal investigator and trial participants.

Discussion

Using cancer-specific methylated DNA as a target for the early detection of cancer has several advantages, when compared with using known biomarkers [15]. (1) Unlike mRNA or protein, DNA is not easily degraded outside the body and maintains relatively high stability when isolated from body fluids for non-invasive diagnosis. (2) DNA can be amplified by PCR, which enables effective detection of minute quantities of methylated biomarker DNA in patient samples. (3) mRNA and protein markers require multiplexing to increase their accuracy in cancer diagnosis, whereas methylated biomarkers can diagnose cancer with a single gene and are not greatly affected by sample purity. (4) Biomarker levels can vary based on changes in emotional, physiological, or pathological factors that are unrelated to cancer; however, DNA methylation is highly robust in terms of detection because no such changes have been reported in vivo. (5) DNA methylation has a higher specificity for specific cancers than gene mutations, mRNA, or protein markers. (6) Unlike with other markers, early detection is possible with DNA methylation because methylation occurs in pre-cancerous lesions or early cancers.

Despite its accuracy, patients who undergo colonoscopy feel discomfort due to its invasiveness and the need for extensive bowel preparation. Therefore, a non-invasive and accurate novel screening technique can help make colonoscopy a selective procedure. As mentioned above, we previously demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test for detecting CRC in a case-controlled study [19]. EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test exhibited high analytical sensitivity and specificity for SDC2 methylation detection, as well as high reproducibility [19]. These results provided strong evidence that EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test is optimized for analyzing stool-derived DNA. To further improve clinical sensitivity for detecting precancerous lesions, digital PCR or next generation sequencing techniques will be helpful to detect SDC2 methylation in stool samples.

Our stool DNA-based test employs a single methylation marker SDC2 for detecting CRC, whereas the multitarget stool-based DNA test called Cologuard (which is USA Food and Drug Administration-approved) assesses the presence of 2 methylation markers (BMP3 and NDRG4) and KRAS mutations and includes FIT of stool samples. The SDC2 methylation test has the same high sensitivity for detecting CRC as Cologuard [20]. Furthermore, the NPV of our test is comparable to that of Cologuard (99.9%) and FIT (99.7%), indicating that a negative methylation test result can provide similar information regarding the absence of CRC [18].

It has been reported that aberrant SDC2 methylation occurs frequently in the early stages of neoplasia, is maintained in advanced CRC, and is unaffected by such factors as disease stage, age, sex, and race. These findings were observed in clinical studies comparing methylation of SDC2 in stool DNA from patients with different stages of CRC, as well as from healthy subjects [17,18,19, 21, 22]. Several other studies have also reported tests for detecting CRC based on SDC2 methylation in stool DNA [6, 21, 22]. Overall, these reports showed sensitivities of 77.4–81.1% and specificities of 88.2–98%, which are comparable to the values of our test.

Nevertheless, trials involving asymptomatic individuals are required to confirm whether the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer device is a useful cancer-screening tool. Enrollment for this trial began on June 7, 2020 after registration was opened on ClinicalTrials.gov on March 11, 2020 (NCT04304131). This is the first prospective, multicenter trial to evaluate the clinical performance of EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test in asymptomatic high-risk Korean populations. This test uses a real-time PCR assay to detect a single novel DNA methylation marker, methylated SDC2, in stool DNA. We were the first group to identify the usefulness of this biomarker, and we proprietarily developed the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test for early CRC detection. Some similar clinical trials have taken advantage of our discovery and used methylated SDC2 as a biomarker in stool DNA tests for CRC detection; these tests exhibited very good performance, as expected. These similar trials utilizing methylated SDC2 as a biomarker provide further evidence that SDC2 methylation analysis is a useful noninvasive diagnostic approach for early detection of CRC, which may improve current diagnostic practices when used in conjunction with existing screening tools, such as FIT and colonoscopy [6, 21, 22].

We expect that this trial will provide results that will be beneficial for healthy people who want to avoid colonoscopy. Although the EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test cannot match colonoscopy in terms of accuracy, it can still be used for early detection of CRC. This study protocol uses a prospective clinical study design to validate the effectiveness of SDC2 methylation, a new biomarker for non-invasive early detection of CRC, in a relatively small population of high-risk individuals. This work should provide practical information for the design of a larger-scale prospective clinical study of an average-risk population to clarify the use of EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer test as a screening tool for CRC.

Study status

A total of 231 patients were enrolled at the time of submission (November 2, 2020).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

SDC2 :

Syndecan-2

CRF:

Case report form

TP:

True positive

TN:

True negative

FP:

False positive

FN:

False negative

FIT:

Fecal immunochemical test

CT:

Computed tomography

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Hong S, Kong HJ, Lee ES. Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2020. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):351–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dashwood RH. Early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (review). Oncol Rep. 1999;6(2):277–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll MR, Seaman HE, Halloran SP. Tests and investigations for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(10–11):921–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang ZH, Li LH, Yang F, Wang JF. Detection of aberrant methylation in fecal DNA as a molecular screening tool for colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(6):950–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Niu F, Wen J, Fu X, Li C, Zhao R, Wu S, Yu H, Liu X, Zhao X, Liu S, et al. Stool DNA test of methylated syndecan-2 for the early detection of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark. 2017;26(9):1411–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdel Razek AA, Abu Zeid MM, Bilal M, Abdel Wahab NM. Virtual CT colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52(66):1698–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, Wada R, Mitsushima T, Shiratori Y. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):422–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger BM, Ahlquist DA. Stool DNA screening for colorectal neoplasia: biological and technical basis for high detection rates. Pathology. 2012;44(2):80–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baylin SB, Herman JG, Graff JR, Vertino PM, Issa JP. Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia. Adv Cancer Res. 1998;72:141–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Zhu YQ, Wu YQ, Zhang P, Qi J. Detection of promoter hypermethylation of Wnt antagonist genes in fecal samples for diagnosis of early colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(20):6329–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadiyska T, Nossikoff A. Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(35):10057–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baylin SB, Ohm JE. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer - a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction? Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(2):107–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ushijima T. Detection and interpretation of altered methylation patterns in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(3):223–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu J, Yao X. Use of DNA methylation for cancer detection and molecular classification. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;40(2):135–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vedeld HM, Goel A, Lind GE. Epigenetic biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancers: the current state and clinical perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;51:36–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh TJ, Kim N, Moon Y, Kim MS, Hoehn BD, Park CH, Kim TS, Kim NK, Chung HC, An S. Genome-wide identification and validation of a novel methylation biomarker, SDC2, for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagnos JMD. 2013;15(4):498–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh TJ, Oh HI, Seo YY, Jeong D, Kim C, Kang HW, Han YD, Chung HC, Kim NK, An S. Feasibility of quantifying SDC2 methylation in stool DNA for early detection of colorectal cancer. Clin Epigenet. 2017;9:126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Han YD, Oh TJ, Chung TH, Jang HW, Kim YN, An S, Kim NK. Early detection of colorectal cancer based on presence of methylated syndecan-2 (SDC2) in stool DNA. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11(1):51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Levin TR, Lavin P, Lidgard GP, Ahlquist DA, Berger BM. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1287–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Liu S, Wang H, Zheng L, Zhou C, Li G, Huang R, Wang H, Li C, Fan X, et al. Robust performance of a novel stool DNA test of methylated SDC2 for colorectal cancer detection: a multicenter clinical study. Clin Epigenet. 2020;12(1):162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Su WC, Kao WY, Chang TK, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Chen YC, Li CC, Hsieh YC, Yeh HJ, Chang CC, et al. Stool DNA test targeting methylated syndecan-2 (SDC2) as a noninvasive screening method for colorectal cancer. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(1):BSR20201930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff at Genomictree Inc. for their technical assistance.

Funding

The study is a sponsor-initiated trial funded by Genomictree, Daejeon, Korea. Genomictree has participated in the study design and will be involved in data collection, management, analysis, and interpretation. The company will also play a role in writing the report and submitting it for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Seoul, Gangdong-gu, 05278, Korea

    Chang Woo Kim & Suk-Hwan Lee

  2. Department of Surgery, Koo Hospital, 141 Gamsambuk-gil, Daegu, Korea

    Hyunjin Kim

  3. Department of Surgery, Busan Hangun Hospital, 348 Chungnyeol-daero, Dongnae-gu, Busan, Korea

    Hyoung Rae Kim

  4. Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 93 Jungbu-daero, Suwon, Korea

    Bong-Hyeon Kye

  5. Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Tongil-ro, Seoul, 1021, Korea

    Hyung Jin Kim

  6. Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seoul, Korea

    Byung Soh Min

  7. Genomictree, Inc, 44-6 Techno 10-ro Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea

    Tae Jeong Oh & Sungwhan An

Authors
  1. Chang Woo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyunjin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyoung Rae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bong-Hyeon Kye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hyung Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Byung Soh Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tae Jeong Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sungwhan An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Suk-Hwan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CWK, HK, HRK, TJO, SA, and SHL have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and have been involved in drafting this manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. CWK, BHK, HJK, BSM, TJO, and SHL have made contributions to the design of the study and organization of this trial. All authors have given their final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk-Hwan Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors will follow the guidelines set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki to protect the patients. The trial will be performed according to the ICH-GCP guidelines. The institutional review board of the principal investigator (SH Lee) approved the trial (KHNMC 2019-10-019) at Kyung Hee University Hospital, Gangdong. To participate, all study subjects will understand and agree to the aims and process of the trial, possible results, and risks. Written informed consent must be provided in a language that participants can understand and be explained by an investigator. If participants cannot read the informed consent form, an investigator must read it to them in the presence of a witness. Even if a participant has signed the informed consent form, an investigator must stop any procedure that the participant refuses to proceed with. A copy of the signed informed consent form will be provided to the participant, while the original copy will be retained by the investigator for safekeeping.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. However, EarlyTect™-Colon Cancer tests will be provided by Genomictree, Daejeon, Korea.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, C.W., Kim, H., Kim, H.R. et al. Colorectal cancer screening using a stool DNA-based SDC2 methylation test: a multicenter, prospective trial. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01759-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01759-9

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us