Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Technical advance
  • Open access
  • Published:

Assessment of a novel method to detect clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori using a stool antigen test reagent

BMC Gastroenterology volume 20, Article number: 397 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The resistance rate of Helicobacter pylori to clarithromycin (CAM) is high among infected children in Japan. Therefore, a new method for detecting CAM-resistant H. pylori using a minimally invasive technique is strongly desired. We aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of our newly developed nested polymerase chain reaction-quenching probe (Nested PCR-QP) method using stool specimens.

Methods

We first evaluated our method using a residual solution of the H. pylori stool antigen test for adolescents. Then, we evaluated our method using culture testing for adults.

Results

Among 57 middle school students with H. pylori, the Nested PCR-QP test results of 53 (90.3%) were able to be analyzed. A total of 28 students had CAM resistance mutations. We found a genetic mutation in 28 students and no mutation in 23 students, and these results were consistent with those of PCR-direct sequencing. In the 23 adults who were diagnosed with H. pylori infection using the rapid urease test and culture testing, we were able to use Nested PCR-QP for analyzing 21 adults who tested positive in the stool H. pylori antigen test. The results obtained for all 21 adults were consistent with those obtained via the drug susceptibility test.

Conclusions

Our novel method could be useful for non-invasively detecting CAM resistance mutations in H. pylori. This may help select a drug to reduce eradication failure rates against H. pylori.

Trial registration This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (no. UMIN000030632, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034977) on 29 December 2017.

Peer Review reports

Background

Helicobacter pylori infects the gastric mucosa, where it causes chronic inflammation, which in turn increases the risk of gastric cancer [1,2,3,4]. Eradication of H. pylori reduces the risk of gastric cancer [3, 5,6,7,8]. H. pylori eradication is also more effective at reducing the risk of gastric cancer in younger individuals than in older individuals who have suffered from chronic gastritis over a long duration [9,10,11,12,13,14].

In Japan, While the age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer are decreasing in men and women, gastric cancer has the highest incidence in men and the third highest incidence in women among all cancers. Furthermore, the gastric cancer mortality rate is second highest in men and third highest in women among all cancer mortalities [15]. Recently, the number of municipalities in Japan that perform H. pylori testing and eradication in middle school students for preventing gastric cancer has been increasing [16, 17]. In 2016, Saga Prefecture became one of the first prefectures in Japan to begin testing for H. pylori in all third year middle school students in the prefecture and performing eradication therapy for those who tested positive [18]. This effort is part of the “A H. pylori screening and treatment program to eliminate gastric cancer among junior high school students in Saga Prefecture.” While H. pylori tests being conducted throughout Japan differ across municipalities, many regions use the urine H. pylori antibody test as the primary test and then use either the urea breath test or the stool H. pylori antigen test as the secondary test [19,20,21].

Eradication therapy for H. pylori is performed for those who test positive in the secondary test. Because the targeted patients are children, selection of the eradication drug is extremely important from the perspectives of safety and efficacy. The conventional treatment for H. pylori infection is clarithromycin (CAM) administration [22, 23]. The H. pylori CAM resistance rate is high in young people in Japan [24, 25]. Therefore, CAM resistance must be assessed via drug sensitivity testing before selecting an effective and safe eradication drug. However, because the drug susceptibility test used on strains that are cultured from gastric biopsy tissue involves a highly invasive test sample collection procedure, it places a heavy burden on patients. This makes performing testing in children difficult, particularly in those who are asymptomatic. The major cause of CAM resistance in H. pylori is 23S rRNA genetic mutations (A2142C, A2142G, and A2143G) [26]. In recent years, there have been reports on a genetic test for detecting H. pylori CAM resistance using a non-invasive stool test. However, the sensitivity of such tests remains insufficient (60–80%), and the specificity has not been fully evaluated [27,28,29].

Therefore, we developed the Nested polymerase chain reaction-quenching probe (Nested PCR-QP) method. This method is used to detect 23S rRNA genetic mutations that are associated with CAM resistance with a high degree of sensitivity using the fluid remaining after the stool antigen test. This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of this novel Nested PCR-QP method that uses stool specimens.

Methods

We designed two clinical studies to examine the clinical usefulness of Nested PCR-QP using stool specimens. The first study involved a method using the residual solution of the H. pylori stool antigen test for adolescents because performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in adolescents is difficult. The second study used culture testing for adults.

Sensitivity of Nested PCR-QP detection and correlation with eradication therapy

The subjects were middle school students in Saga Prefecture who underwent H. pylori testing between August and December 2017, under our program to eliminate gastric cancer. Our program targeted 8519 students in 2016, of which 7230 actually participated. The urine H. pylori antibody test (RAPIRAN®; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which was used as the primary test, gave positive results for 356 students, of whom 120 were randomly selected and asked to participate in the present study. The consent to participate in the present study was obtained from 71 middle school students (median age was 14.7 years, male/female ratio = 40/31). These 71 students underwent stool H. pylori antigen testing (Testmate Rapid Pylori Antigen®; Wakamoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) as the secondary test. Among these students, the secondary test results were positive for 57 and negative for 14 individuals. Therefore, the 57 patients who tested positive in the secondary test were judged to be infected with H. pylori. We then performed Nested PCR-QP measurements using the leftover specimens from the stool antigen tests that the 57 students who tested positive had undergone. DNA sequencing analysis was performed for all 57 samples by carrying out Nested PCR-QP using PCR-direct sequencing. Students who tested positive in the stool antigen test underwent a 7-day treatment that comprised 20 mg vonoprazan (VPZ) (Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), 750 mg amoxicillin (AMPC), and 200 mg CAM twice a day, regardless of the results regarding CAM resistance mutations. Students who failed the primary eradication therapy were treated with a regimen that replaced CAM with metronidazole (MNZ) as a secondary eradication therapy. The regimen for H. pylori eradication therapy followed that specified for public medical insurance in Japan. Confirmation of eradication therapy was conducted using the urea breath test (UBIT® tablet, 100 mg, and POC One®; Otsuka Electronics Co., Ltd., Hirakata, Japan).

The culture test and drug susceptibility test

We performed another study on adults at Imamura Hospital (Tosu, Japan) because EGD is difficult to perform in asymptomatic children. The subjects were 23 adults who were diagnosed with H. pylori infection on the basis of the results of the rapid urease test (RUT) (Helicocheck®; Institute of Immunology, Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan) and culture testing performed at the hospital. These subjects had undergone EGD between February 2018 and September 2018. Culture testing and drug susceptibility testing (H. pylori drug sensitivity test: H. pylori minimal inhibitory concentration measurement) were performed by BML, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). We used the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints recommended by the Japan Society of Chemotherapy for CAM (susceptible ≤ 0.25 µg/mL) and AMPC (susceptible ≤ 0.03 µg/mL) [30]. We also used the breakpoints listed in the EUCAST Trial breakpoint table v.8.1 for MNZ (resistant > 8 µg/mL) [31]. Stool specimens were used in the stool H. pylori antigen test, and the remnant solution of those who tested positive was used to perform Nested PCR-QP measurements.

Nested PCR-QP

Nested PCR-QP is a novel genetic analysis method that analyzes 23S rRNA genetic mutations (A2142C, A2142G, and A2143G) that are associated with CAM resistance in H. pylori. The basic components are the Nested PCR and QProbe [32]. Stool H. pylori antigen test remnant solution was used in Nested PCR-QP. DNA was extracted from Nested PCR-QP samples of 100 μL using a QIAamp® DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) to obtain 150 μL of DNA solution. This DNA solution was the first PCR template for Nested PCR-QP. In addition, for quality control, positive and negative controls were measured simultaneously for each assay. For positive control, plasmid DNA containing a region amplified by this method in the H. pylori 23S rRNA gene was used. Two types of positive controls, wild type and mutant type (A2143G), were used. For negative control, Tris–EDTA buffer was used.

The first PCR primers were Hp23S 1835F and Hp23S 2327R based on the method described by Noguchi et al. [33]. The first PCR used a 1-μL template that was created using a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and it was performed using Ampdirect plus BIOTAQ HS DNA Polymerase (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The PCR protocol was as follows: after primer annealing for 10 min at 95 °C, 36 cycles were performed at 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 60 s.

The first PCR mixture, which was diluted 20-fold in sterilized water, was used as the second PCR template. The second PCR primers were the newly designed HP F1 (5′-CCAGAGATTCAGTGAAATTGTAGTGGAGGTG-3′) and HP R3 (5′-GGCTCCATAAGAGCCAAAGCCCTTAC-3′), and the probe used was the newly designed HP QP1 (5′-CCGCGGCAAGACGGAAAGAC-BODIPY-3′). The second PCR and melting curve analysis were performed using a 5-μL template from LightCycler Nano (Roche Diagnostics K.K., Tokyo, Japan) and KOD DNA Polymerase (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The PCR protocol was as follows: after primer annealing for 2 min at 98 °C, 65 cycles were performed at 95 °C for 5 s and 55 °C for 15 s. Melting curve analysis was performed as follows: after the second PCR, warming was performed from 40 to 80 °C at a rate of 0.09 °C/s, and measurements were obtained using fluorescent light with a wavelength of 510–528 nm. Melting curve analysis using fluorescence quenching allowed us to determine that there were no mutations when the fluorescence quenching inflection point was between 67 and 71 °C (wild-type). However, there were mutations between 59 and 63 °C (A2142G, A2143G) and between 63 and 67 °C (A2142C).

Statistical analysis

The proportion of CAM resistance among H. pylori and the effectiveness of eradication therapy were compared between the Nested PCR-QP mutation group and the non-mutation group using the chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at a P value of < 0.05. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using JMP Pro13 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Assessment of CAM resistance genetic mutations using Nested PCR-QP

The results of stool H. pylori antigen testing and Nested PCR-QP among the 71 students who tested positive in the urine H. pylori test are shown in Table 1. Of the 57 students who tested positive in the stool H. pylori antigen test, Nested PCR-QP analysis was possible for 53 (93.0%) students. Twenty-eight (52.8%) of these 53 students had CAM resistance mutations. One student possessed the A2142C mutation and 27 students possessed the A2143G mutation. None of the students possessed the A2142G mutation. Twenty-five students did not have any CAM resistance mutations. These results were consistent with those of PCR-direct sequencing.

Table 1 Determination of CAM resistance mutations using Nested PCR-QP
Full size table

Investigation of the eradication therapy results in 41 students for whom we were able to conduct follow-up examinations showed that CAM resistance mutations affected eradication therapy. The eradication therapy success rate was 94.4% (17/18) in the non-mutation group and 82.6% in the CAM resistance mutation group (19/23; P = 0.25; Table 2). Selection of eradication therapy drugs did not change according to CAM resistance mutations. All five of the subjects for secondary eradication showed successful outcomes following eradication therapy with a regimen using MNZ.

Table 2 Effect of CAM resistance mutations on eradication therapy
Full size table

Nested PCR-QP in relation to the culture test and drug sensitivity test

At Imamura Hospital, during the designated period, 30 patients received EGD in a general practice situation. Five of these patients gave a negative RUT result, and two of the remaining did not submit a stool sample. Therefore, 23 individuals in total were included in the present study. EGD results found no evidence of gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, or gastric cancer, but chronic gastritis was found in all cases. The results of culture and drug susceptibility testing, as well as the stool H. pylori antigen test and Nested PCR-QP, in 23 adults (median age of 53 years, male/female ratio = 12/11) with H. pylori infection are shown in Table 3. Drug susceptibility testing showed that the CAM resistance rate was 30.4% (7/23), the AMPC resistance rate was 4.3% (1/23), and the MNZ resistance rate was 39.1% (9/23). The sensitivity of the stool H. pylori antigen test was 91.3% (21/23). Nested PCR-QP was not performed for two adults with a negative stool H. pylori antigen test result.

Table 3 Coincidence rate of the Nested PCR-QP and the drug susceptibility test for CAM
Full size table

The coincidence rate for Nested PCR-QP and drug susceptibility testing is shown in Table 3. Of the 23 adults who underwent the tests, we were able to use Nested PCR-QP to analyze 23S rRNA genetic mutations in 21 who tested positive in the stool H. pylori antigen test. The CAM resistance mutation results for all of these 21 adults were consistent with the results of drug susceptibility testing in culture tests.

Discussion

Our novel Nested PCR-QP method uses the remnant solution of the stool H. pylori antigen test. This enables simultaneous identification of the presence of the H. pylori gene and CAM resistance mutations without the need to perform EGD. Therefore, this method may be a useful aid for drug selection to eradicate H. pylori.

Although an eradication therapy regimen is generally selected after determining whether the patient has CAM resistance using enrichment culture or sensitivity testing, these require tissue samples to be obtained endoscopically for use in culture and sensitivity testing. Many young individuals are asymptomatic, despite H. pylori infection [34], and highly invasive tests, such as EGD, place a major burden on the patient. Therefore, a non-invasive test that can be used in younger patients and that enables a definitive diagnosis of H. pylori infection using a stool antigen test reagent while simultaneously determining whether the patient is CAM resistant is highly recommended. A definitive diagnosis and determination of CAM resistance would increase the efficiency of eradication therapy. Therefore, our method is also useful in selecting a drug for eradication in that situation. Our novel method detected CAM sensitivity among H. pylori at a level of 93%, and the results of CAM resistance were completely consistent with drug susceptibility testing. These were good results compared with previous reports [27,28,29].

In our former study of third-year middle school students, the proportion of CAM resistant mutations among H. pylori was 52.8% (28/53), and in our latter study of adults, it was 30.4% (7/23), indicating that adolescents tended to have a higher rate of CAM resistance (P = 0.07). It has been reported that the CAM resistance rate of H. pylori is high among young people in Japan [24], which is believed to be a result of the frequent use of CAM prescriptions for childhood respiratory tract infections in this generation [35].

In subjects who underwent eradication therapy (VPZ, AMPC, and CAM) who could be followed up, we found that while the success rate for those with no CAM resistance mutation was 94.4% (17/18), the success rate for those with such a mutation was 82.6% (19/23). While there was no significant difference in the success rate between those with and without a CAM resistance mutation, there appeared to be a tendency for higher eradication therapy failure rates among those with a CAM resistance mutation, as detected by our novel method. It has been found that the success rate of H. pylori eradication therapy using CAM is low in CAM-resistant H. pylori [36], but the success rate of eradication in the CAM-resistant mutation group was 82.6% (19/23) in the present study. It is thought that this may be due to the use of VPZ, as similarly described by Murakami et al. [37]. If CAM resistance of H. pylori is tested by our new method before eradication treatment and the drug is changed according to the results, the eradication success rate could be higher among young Japanese patients with CAM resistance. However, there is a report recommending treatment with dual therapy using VPZ and AMPC, because a good eradication success rate can be obtained regardless of CAM resistance in H. pylori using VPZ [38]. In areas of high CAM resistance to H. pylori in Japanese adolescents, it is strongly recommended to examine CAM resistance before selecting eradication agents, and this new method seems to be very beneficial [35, 39]. In such areas, there are reports that it is recommended to use MNZ from the primary eradication therapy other than insurance medical treatment [40], but there is also a problem that MNZ resistant H. pylori. Although the MNZ resistance H. pylori rate is low in Japanese children, there are areas in the world where the MNZ resistance rate is high, so we think that it is important to accurately confirm the presence or absence of CAM resistance H. pylori by our novel method, and CAM should be used properly. In addition to this, the equipment required for PCR testing using our novel method is a conventional PCR equipment, and the reagents for testing cost about $25 per sample. Furthermore, the required time is 1 h for DNA extraction, 3 h for 1st PCR, 2 h for 2nd PCR, and half an hour for data analysis. Therefore, the time taken to complete a test is about 6.5 h.

This study has several limitations. The first limitation is that we were unable to investigate the effect of ingestion of gastric antacids, such as proton pump inhibitors. Second, although this new method could evaluate the CAM-resistant mutations of H. pylori without being affected by the susceptibility of AMPC and MNZ, we were unable to assess the effect of differences of H. pylori genotypes (e.g., the presence of the cag pathogenicity island).

Conclusions

The novel Nested PCR-QP method is able to simultaneously identify the presence of H. pylori genes and the presence of CAM resistance mutations using the remnant solution from stool H. pylori antigen tests. In this method, EGD does not need to be performed. This method could be useful for selecting a drug aimed at reducing H. pylori eradication failure rates and further improving the prevention of gastric cancer.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAM:

Clarithromycin

QProbe:

Quenching probe

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

H. pylori :

Helicobacter pylori

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

VPZ:

Vonoprazan

AMPC:

Amoxicillin

MNZ:

Metronidazole

RUT:

Rapid urease test

MIC:

Minimal inhibitory concentration

UMIN:

University Medical Information Network

References

  1. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Park JY, Forman D, Waskit LA, et al. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori and CagA-positive infections and global variations in gastric cancer. Toxins. 2018;10:e163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki H, Mori H. World trends for H. pylori eradication therapy and gastric cancer prevention strategy by H. pylori test-and-treat. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:354–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatakeyama H. Helicobacter pylori CagA and cancer: a paradigm for hit-and-run carcinogenesis. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:306–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsuda M, Asaka M, Kato M, et al. Effect on Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy against gastric cancer in Japan. Helicobacter. 2017;22:e12415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sugano K. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the incidence of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:435–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Asaka M, Mabe K, Matsushima R, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication to eliminate gastric cancer: the Japanese strategy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44:639–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsutsumi K, Kusano C, Suzuki S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of latex agglutination turbidimetric immunoassay in screening adolescents for Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan. Digestion. 2018;98:75–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Take S, Mizuno M, Ishiki K, et al. Baseline gastric mucosal atrophy is a risk factor associated with the development of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer diseases. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:21–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong BC, Lam SK, Wong WM, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region of China: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:187–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugano K, Tack J, Kuipers EJ, et al. Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Gut. 2015;64:1353–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato S, Kikuchi S, Nakajima S. When does gastric atrophy develop in Japanese children? Helicobacter. 2008;13:278–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nozaki K, Shimizu N, Ikehara Y, et al. Eradication diminishes enhancing effects of Helicobacter pylori infection on glandular stomach carcinogenesis in Mongolian gerbils. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:235–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Furuta T, El-Omar EM, Xiao F, et al. Interleukin 1beta polymorphisms increase risk of hypochlorhydria and atrophic gastritis and reduce risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence in Japan. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:92–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Taniyama Y, Katanoda K, Charvat H, et al. Estimation of lifetime cumulative incidence and mortality risk of gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47:1097–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Akamatsu T, Ichikawa S, Okada S, et al. Introduction of an examination and treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in high school health screening. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:1353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kusano C, Gotoda T, Ishikawa H, et al. The administrative project of Helicobacter pylori infection screening among junior high school students in an area of Japan with a high incidence of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:S16–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kakiuchi T, Matsuo M, Endo H, et al. A helicobacter pylori screening and treatment program to eliminate gastric cancer among junior high school students in Saga Prefecture: a preliminary report. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato S, Fujimura S, Udagawa H, et al. Antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains in Japanese children. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:649–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kato S, Fujimura S. Primary antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in children during the past 9 years. Pediatr Int. 2010;52:187–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akamatsu T, Okamura T, Iwaya Y, et al. Screening to identify and eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection in teenagers in Japan. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44:667–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Okuda M, Kikuchi S, Mabe K, et al. Natioriwide survey of Helicobacter pylori treatment for children and adolescents in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2017a;59:57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gatta L, Vakil N, Vaira D, Scarpignato C. Global eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential therapy. BMJ. 2013;347:f4587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Okamura T, Suga T, Nagaya T, Arakura N, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and characteristics of eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori in Japan: a multi-generational comparison. Helicobacter. 2014;19:214–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Okuda M, Kikuchi S, Mabe K, et al. Nationwide survey of Helicobacter pylori treatment for children and adolescents in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2017b;59:57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Raymond J, Burucoa C, Pietrini O, et al. Clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from French children: prevalence of the different mutations and coexistence of clones harboring two different mutations in the same biopsy. Helicobacter. 2007;12:157–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lottspeich C, Schwarzer A, Panthel K, et al. Evaluation of the novel Helicobacter pylori ClariRes real-time PCR assay for detection and clarithromycin susceptibility testing of H. pylori in stool specimens from symptomatic children. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1718–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brennan DE, Omorogbe J, Hussey M, et al. Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance in stool vs biopsy samples. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9214–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Beckman E, Saracino I, Fiorini G, et al. A novel stool PCR test for Helicobacter pylori may predict clarithromycin resistance and eradication of infection at a high rate. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2400–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kobayashi I, Hasegawa M, Saika T, et al. A new semi-solid agar dilution method for determining amoxycillin, clarithromycin and azithromycin MICs for Helicobacter pylori isolates. J Antimicrobe Chemother. 1997;40:713–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 8.1; 2018. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_8.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2020.

  32. Kurata S, Kanagawa T, Yamada K, et al. Fluorescent quenching-based quantitative detection of specific DNA/RNA using a BODIPY((R)) FL-labeled probe or primer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:E34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Noguchi N, Rimbara E, Kato A, et al. Detection of mixed clarithromycin-resistant and susceptible Helicobacter pylori using nested PCR and direct sequencing of DNA extracted from faeces. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:1174–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Macarthur C. Helicobacter pylori infection and childhood recurrent abdominal pain: lack of evidence for a cause and effect relationship. Can J Gastroenterol. 1999;13:607–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kato S, Shimizu T, Toyoda S, et al. Japanese Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition. The Updated JSPGHAN Guidelines for the Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Childhood. Pediatr Int. 2020. Epub ahead of print.

  36. Kato S, Konno M, Maisawa S, et al. Results of triple eradication therapy in Japanese children: a retrospective multicenter study. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:838–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murakami K, Sakurai Y, Shiino M, et al. Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, as a component of first-line and second-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a phase III, randomised, double-blind study. Gut. 2016;65(9):1439–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gotoda T, Kusano C, Suzuki S, et al. Clinical impact of vonoprazan-based dual therapy with amoxicillin for H. pylori infection in a treatment-Naïve cohort of junior high school students in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2020;55:969–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jones NL, Koletzko S, Goodman K, et al. ESPGHAN, NASPGHAN. Joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64:991–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mabe K, Okuda M, Kikuchi S, et al. Randomized controlled trial: PPI-based triple therapy containing metronidazole versus clarithromycin as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori in adolescents and young adults in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24:538–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Testing, culture testing, and drug susceptibility testing in this study were performed on a contracted basis by Mizuho Medi Co., Ltd. (Tosu, Japan). We thank Ellen Knapp, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding support. Testing, culture testing, and drug susceptibility testing in this study were performed on a contracted basis by Mizuho Medi Co., Ltd. (Tosu, Japan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga-shi, Saga, 849-8501, Japan

    Toshihiko Kakiuchi, Aiko Nakayama & Muneaki Matsuo

  2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Japan

    Kazutoshi Hashiguchi & Ichiro Imamura

  3. Division of Clinical Research Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan

    Ayako Takamori

  4. Department of Pediatrics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

    Masumi Okuda

Authors
  1. Toshihiko Kakiuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazutoshi Hashiguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ichiro Imamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aiko Nakayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ayako Takamori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Masumi Okuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muneaki Matsuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: TK and MM. Acquisition of data: TK, AN, KH, and II. Analysis and interpretation of data: TK, AN, KH, AT, and II. Drafting of the manuscript: TK. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: MO and MM. Statistical analysis: AT. Obtained funding: TK. Administrative, technical, or material support: MO. Study supervision: MM. Writing, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript: MM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiko Kakiuchi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The institutional review boards of Saga University Hospital (approval numbers: 2017-04-06, 2017-12-10) and Imamura Hospital (approval number: 2018-01) approved the present study. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (no. UMIN000030632, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000034977) on 29 December 2017. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their parents or guardians.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kakiuchi, T., Hashiguchi, K., Imamura, I. et al. Assessment of a novel method to detect clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori using a stool antigen test reagent. BMC Gastroenterol 20, 397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01549-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01549-9

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us