Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

The prevalence and phenotype in Brazilian patients with inflammatory bowel disease

  • 1, 4Email author,
  • 2 and
  • 3
BMC Gastroenterology201818:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0822-y

  • Received: 4 April 2017
  • Accepted: 11 June 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) varies in different countries. This study aimed to assess phenotype, medications, prevalence and incidence of IBD in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Methods

Patients with IBD who utilized the Public Medication-Dispensing System of the Department of Health of Espírito Santo, between August 2012 and July 2014. Of 1484 active patients, 1048 were analyzed, which included patients of all ages.

Results

The prevalence of IBD was 38.2 per 100,000 inhabitants, with ulcerative colitis (UC) being 24.1 per 100,000 and Crohn’s disease (CD), 14.1 per 100,000. The incidence of IBD was 7.7 per 100,000 inhabitants/year (UC – 5.3/100,000 inhabitants/year and CD – 2.4/100,000 inhabitants/year). Out of the 1048 patients analyzed, 669 had UC (63.84%), 357 had CD (34.06%), and 22 had unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (UIBD; 2.10%). There were 48/1048 (4.5%) pediatric patients (16 years of age or younger). On the UC phenotype (n = 654), we observed left-sided colitis in 247 (37.7%), pancolitis in 209 (31.9%), and proctitis in 198 patients (30.2%). Pancolitis was more frequent in pediatric patients (p = 0.007). CD showed a homogeneous distribution between ileitis (L1), colitis (L2), and ileocolitis (L3). Regarding the CD behavior (n = 352) observed the inflammatory type (B1) in 176 (50%); fistulizing (B3) in 75 (21.2%), isolated type (B3) in 29 (8.2%), and perianal fistulizing type (B3p) in 46 (13.1%). Biologic therapies were used in 154/357 (43.3%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of the IBD in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil was higher than in two other brazilian studies. There was high utilization of biologic therapies in patients with CD.

Keywords

  • Prevalence
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Phenotype
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Crohn’s disease
  • Brazil

Background

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex processes [1] and are associated with regional epidemiological [25] and phenotypical [68] variations. Latin America, particularly Brazil, is considered to be a region with low prevalence and incidence of IBD, though there has been an increase in incidence in Brazil [9, 10]. In 2015, Parent et al. found a prevalence of 12.8 cases/100,000 inhabitants in the northeast of Brazil [11].

According to the medication-dispensing protocol of the Ministry of Health, treatment for IBD in Brazil is provided by the federal government for all patients, including those from both the public and private systems [1214].

Espírito Santo is a state located in the Southeast region of Brazil (Fig. 1). It has a large immigrant population of Italians and Germans [15], and in 2014, the population was 3,885,049 [16].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Map of Espírito Santo, Brazil, South America

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, incidence, phenotype, and medications used in patients who received treatment for IBD through the dispensing pharmacies in the State of Espírito Santo.

Methods

Ethical considerations

This study had used secondary data from documentation required by the Ministry of Health in order to have access to highly expensive medication. As the data is secondary and was obtained through medical reports, there was no parent’s consent form used for the patients under 16 years old. There was no identification of the study’s subjects, preserving the confidentiality and privacy of the study’s candidates, and were approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Nossa Senhora da Gloria Children’s Hospital (CAAE 19602813.8.0000.5069) after obtaining authorization from the State Office for Pharmaceutical Assistance.

Study location

The study was conducted in the Citizen’s State Pharmacy sector of the Espírito Santo Office for Pharmaceutical Assistance, which is responsible for dispensing medications for patients with IBD in all State.

Sample analyzed

The sample included 1484 patients, with confirmed diagnosis, of all ages with IBD in the state of Espírito Santo (Fig. 1) who received medications through the Federal Government between August 1, 2012 and July 31, 2014 and for whom the incidence and prevalence of IBD was determined. Phenotype and treatment information was not available for 436 patients, and therefore data for 1048 patients were used (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Flowchart for the analysis of medication dispensing requests for IBD in Espírito Santo, Brazil

Study design

In medication-dispensing services the evaluation is conducted by only one gastroenterologist physician, in this case, the main author, who was responsible for dispensing the medication for IBD, and data analyzed were obtained through the analysis of administrative requests of these medications, and included medical report, endoscopy exams, histopathology and imaging tests, which followed the Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines of the Brazilian Government [13, 14]. The diagnosis of IBD and the phenotype were established according to the Montreal criteria [17] for Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC). The patients whose endoscopic examination, image and histopathological examination, laboratorial, associated to medical reports describing the difficulty to define CD and UC the terminology unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (UIBD) was applied.

Dependent variables included the diagnosis, IBD classification, new cases (patients who received the diagnosis within one year of starting the administrative request), chronic cases (patients who received the diagnosis more than one year from starting the administrative request), and medications. Independent variables included age and gender.

Study limitations

The study was conducted with secondary data and some information has been compromised, such as in some cases the endoscopic report was not included and only the histopathology report was analyzed. Not all CD patients included in the study had an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy/biopsy, and magnetic resonance and some older documents have been damaged due to time, making it impossible to define the localization of the disease in some cases.

In Brazil, medications for IBD are expensive and provided by the Public Health System for patients treated in the public and private systems. However, it is possible that some patients in the private system obtain their medications directly from drugstores without utilizing the public system.

Statistical analysis

An Excel spreadsheet was used to collect the data, and the data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 20.0 software. Data were tabulated and analyzed through descriptive analysis of frequencies, percentages, averages, and standard deviations (SD). To determine associations between categorical variables, achi-square test was used, and Fisher’s exact test was also used when appropriate. Student’s t-test or ANOVA were used for quantitative variables. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics was used to calculate prevalence and incidence based on the last census in 2014, in which the population of Espírito Santo was 3,885,049 [16]. To calculate prevalence, the total number of active requests at the Citizen’s State Pharmacy (1484) was used. To calculate incidence, new cases arising in the second year of the study were used (August 1, 2013 to July 31, 2014).

Results

There were 1484 registered patients who received medication in the state of Espírito Santo. Considering the population in the region in 2014, the prevalence of IBD in the state was 38.2/105 inhabitants. From these, 935 (63%) were diagnosed with UC and 549 (37%) were diagnosed with CD, yielding prevalence of 24.1 per 100,000 and 14.1 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively. The incidence was calculated based on new cases in 2014 (298 patients – 204 UC and 94 CD), with an incidence of IBD of 7.7/100,00 inhabitants/year (UC 5.3/100,000 inhabitants/year and CD 2.4/100,000 inhabitants/year).

1Demographic data are summarized in Table 1 and refer to the 1048 patients whose administrative requests were reviewed, of whom 669 (63.84%) had a diagnosis of UC, 357 (34.06%) had a diagnosis of CD, and 22 (2.10%) had a diagnosis of UIBD.
Table 1

Distribution of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease

Demographic variables

IBD

n = 1026

UC

CD

p

n

%

n

%

 

Year (Yr)

2013

339

62.8%

207

37.92%

0.043

2014

330

68.75%

150

31.25%

 

Age at diagnosis (A)a

A1: ≤ 16

23

3.40%

25

7.00%

 

A2: 17–40

318

47.50%

208

58.30%

0.001

A3: > 40

328

49.00%

124

34.70%

 

Gender

Female

407

60.80%

195

54.60%

0.156

Male

262

39.20%

162

45.40%

 

New cases

2013

215

51.3%

117

55.7%

0.346

2014

204

48.7%

94

44.3%

 

Old Cases

2013

124

49.6%

90

61.6%

0.058

2014

126

50.4%

56

38.4%

 

aAge at diagnosis is not a phenotypic element of the Montreal classification for ulcerative colitis; UC ulcerative colitis, CD, Crohn’s disease

The disease phenotype could not be determined for all patients due to a lack of information in the administrative requests. The phenotypes evaluated are available in Tables 2, 3 and 4. For pediatric patients (16 years of age or younger), 48/1048 (4.5%) patients had IBD, among whom 23/48 (48%) had UC and 25/48 (52%) had CD in Table 1. Pancolitis was more frequent in pediatric patients (p = 0.007), available in Table 2. In Crohn’s disease the inflammatory and perianal fistulizing behavior were more frequent, Table 4.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of ulcerative colitis (n = 654)

Phenotypic elements

Extension

E1

E2

E3

p

Proctitis

Left-sided colitis

Pancolitis

n

%

n

%

n

%

Age at diagnosis (A)a

A1: ≤ 16

3

13.0

6

26.1

14

60.9

0.007

A2: 17–40

89

28.4

116

37.1

108

34.5

 

A3: > 40

106

30.5

125

39.3

87

26.8

 

Gender

Female

126

31.5

153

38.2

121

30.2

0.469

Male

72

28.3

94

37.0

88

32.0

 

aAge at diagnosis is not a phenotypic element of the Montreal classification for ulcerative colitis

Table 3

Clinical characteristics of Crohn’s disease (n = 357)

Phenotypic elements

Total DC

n

%

Location (L)

(n = 353)

L1: terminal ileum

111

31.4

L2: colonic

102

28.9

L3: ileocolonic

109

30.9

L4: isolated upper disease

11

3.2

L1 + L4

8

2.3

L3 + L4

12

3.4

Behavior (B)

(n = 352)

B1: nonstricturing/non-fistulizing

176

50.0

B2: stricturing

56

15.9

B3: fistulizing

29

8.2

B1pa

27

7.7

B2pa

18

5.1

B3pa

46

13.1

Gender

Female

195

54.6

Male

162

45.4

ap perianal disease modifier

Table 4

Crohn disease ‘s behavior in relation to age and gender

Phenotypic elements

Behavior (B)

B1

B2

B3

B1p

B2p

B3p

p

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Age at diagnosis (A)

A1: ≤ 16

10

5.6

0

0.0

2

6.9

3

11.1

1

5.6

9

19.6

0.001

A2: 17–40

90

50.9

30

53.6

20

69.0

20

74.1

16

88.8

29

63.0

 

A3: > 40

77

43.5

26

46.4

7

24.1

4

14.8

1

5.6

8

17.4

 

Gender

Female

110

62.1

26

46.4

16

55.2

10

37.0

11

61.1

22

47.8

0.042

Male

67

37.9

30

53.6

13

44.8

17

63.0

7

38.9

24

52.2

 

B1 nonstricturing/non-fistulizing, B2 stricturing, B3 fistulizing, p-perianal disease modifier

Medication dispensing for patients with IBD is shown in Fig. 3. For UC patients, 591/654 (90,3%) treated with oral aminosalicylates, 438 (74%) have left-sided colitis or pancolitis and those treated with azathioprine, 110/127 (86,8%) had left-sided colitis and pancolitis. The biological treatment was prescribed for 30 (4,5%) patients with UC, with pancolitis 21 (70%) and left-sided colitis 9 (30%). For CD patients, treatment with the immunomodulator was prescribed in 253/357 (70,9%), and in 153/357 (43,4%) of the cases the biological therapy was used, due to perianal involvement 71/152 (46,7%).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Distribution of medications used for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease UC: ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease;5-ASA: mesalazine, SSZ: sulfasalazine, IMN: immunomodulators (azathioprine and methotrexate)

Discussion

In Brazil the prevalence of IBD in the state of Espírito Santo (38,2/100.000 inhabitants), was higher. Parente et al. in Piauí, Brazil, in 2015 [11] analyzing a University Hospital in the northeast region of Brazil found a prevalence of 12.8 cases/100,000 inhabitants and Victoria et al. in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2001 and 2005 [9], analyzing a University Hospital in the southeast region of Brazil found a prevalence of 22.6 cases/100,000 inhabitants, which only analyzed reference points (University Hospitals). The prevalence of IBD in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, was higher (38.2/105inhabitants) because we had data from patients from the whole State, which included the public and private healthcare system. The incidence of IBD in Espírito Santo was also higher than the incidence found by Parente et al. in 2015 [11], when the institution’s incidence peaked at 1.53 cases/100,000 in 2007, which is similar to the data from Porto Rico in 2005 [10, 18]. The incidence of UC was closer to the values found by Victoria et al. in São Paulo [9] and equivalent to those in Porto Rico (Central America) [10, 18] but higher than those in other countries in Central and South America [10].

The evaluation of frequency distributions of IBD showed a predominance of UC, similar to the study published by Burisch et al. in 2014 [19], which compared Eastern and Western Europe and observed a predominance of UC in both regions. The same is observed for Brazilian studies [9, 11, 20]. The frequency distribution between the two forms of IBD shows geographic variations, with a higher predominance of UC in Nordic countries [8]. There is a tendency for CD to predominate in developed countries such as Canada and the USA [8]. In some countries in Eastern Europe, there is an equal frequency of both forms of IBD [8].

For pediatric patients (16 years of age or younger), 48/1048 (4.5%) patients had IBD, among whom 23/48 (48%) had UC and 25/48 (52%) had CD. These frequencies are lower than the overall means of 10 to 25% of pediatric patients with UC and CD, respectively, reported in the literature [21, 22]. However, the frequency was similar to that observed in a study performed in Western and Eastern Europe [19], in which 45/1560 (3%) of patients with IBD were younger than 15 years of age.

Evaluation of UC phenotype showed that left-sided colitis was more frequent, followed by pancolitis and proctitis, which occurred with relatively similar frequency. These results were similar to those found in a comparative study between Western and Eastern Europe [19], which observed left-sided colitis (E2) in 41 and 46% of patients, followed by pancolitis (E3) in 38 and 32% of patients, and proctitis (E1) in 20 and 22% of individuals from Western and Eastern Europe, respectively. These were also similar to the results of a Brazilian study by Parente et al. from 2015 [11]. The distribution and location of CD is relatively homogeneous and stable during its progression [23, 24]. In the current study, there was equivalence between the ileal (L1), colonic (L2), and ileocolonic (L3) forms, which is in agreement with data from some studies [2, 17, 24] but differs from the results of Brazilian studies [11, 20]. Regarding the involvement of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) in isolation or in association with other locations, we observed a frequency of 8.8% (31/353), which is similar to the values of 10 to 15% previously reported in the literature [24].

In the current study, we observed that the inflammatory behavior was in agreement with data from the literature [11, 19, 25]. Perianal involvement was more frequent in younger patients, which characterizes a more severe presentation of the disease in this group of patients. Similar results were observed by Parente et al. [11] and in the European study by Burisch et al. in 2013 [2]. The fistulizing form occurred in 21.2% of patients, whereas it was isolated (B3) in 8.2% of patients and associated with perianal involvement (B3p) in 13.1% of patients. Our data are similar to data from Asia (19%) [3] and the study by Parente et al. [11], which found the B3 form in 13% of patients and the B3p form in 5% of patients.

Regarding the distribution of medications, we observed the use of biologic therapies in 43.3% of patients with CD, which suggests the occurrence of more severe CD; however, more studies are needed to assess the association between treatment and phenotype. Regarding the use of systemic aminosalicylates, we observed a higher frequency in patients with CD, which is not in accordance with current management guidelines, in which they are indicated for mild forms of the disease located in the ileum and for colonic forms of CD, for which there is evidence of efficacy [14, 2629].

Conclusion

The present study found a tendency for higher prevalence and incidence of IBD in Brazil, with values approaching those of regions with moderate incidence and prevalence [4, 8]. Our region is comprised of European immigrants, with one of the largest populations of Italians in Brazil [15, 30], which could justify the data found in our study. However, to date, there have been no studies to assess factors related to etiopathogenesis. Regarding the distribution of demographic and phenotypic data, there were no large differences compared to studies from other regions. Understanding of the epidemiology and phenotypic characteristics can contribute to a better organization and political-economic planning of public health.

Abbreviations

5-ASA: 

Mesalazine

CAAE: 

Certificate of Presentation for Ethical Consideration

CD: 

Crohn’s disease

IBD: 

Inflammatory bowel disease

IMN: 

Immunomodulators

SSZ: 

Sulfasalazine

UC: 

Ulcerative colitis

UIBD: 

Unclassified inflammatory bowel disease

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support provided by the team at Citizen’s State Pharmacy, especially Maria Jose Sartório (Manager of State Office for Pharmaceutical Assistance).

Author contributions

AM: concept and designed the research and collected the data. MPG: designed the research. AM, MPG and RV: contributed to data analyses and interpretation. AM and MPG: wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the fact that they are part of a research with additional data that will be published in the future but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Nossa Senhora da Gloria Children’s Hospital (CAAE 19602813.8.0000.5069) after obtaining authorization from the State Office for Pharmaceutical Assistance.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Management of Pharmaceutical Assistance and Ambulatory of Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Health Department of Espírito Santo, Núcleo Regional de Especialidades de Vitória, BR 262, Km 0, Ed. Eng. Cristiano Tavares, 2° andar, Jardim América, Cariacica, Espírito Santo, 29140-126, Brazil
(2)
Laboratory of Estatistic-Departament of de Federal University of Espírito Santo, Av. Fernando Ferrari s/n, Goiabeiras, Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29060-900, Brazil
(3)
Departament of Medicine, Federal University and University Hospital Cassiano Antonio Moraes of Espírito Santo, Av. Marechal Campos, 1468, Vitória, ES, 29042-755, Brazil
(4)
Desembargador Ferreira Coelho 330/315 Praia do Suá, Ed. Eldorado, Vitoria, 29052210, Brazil

References

  1. Burisch J. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Occurrence, course and prognosis during the first year of disease in a European population-based inception cohort. Dan Med J. 2014;61:B4778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Burisch J, Jess T, Martinato M, et al. ECCO-EpiCom. The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:322–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ng SC, Tang W, Ching JY, et al. Asia-Pacific Crohn's and Colitis Epidemiologic Study (ACCESS) Study Group. Incidence and phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease based on results from the Asia-pacific Crohn's and colitis epidemiology study. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:158–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:46–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Loftus EV Jr, Schoenfeld P, Sandborn WJ. The epidemiology and natural history of Crohn's disease in population-based patient cohorts from North America: a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:51–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgart DC, Bernstein CN, Abbas Z, et al. IBD around the world: comparing the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment: proceedings of the world digestive health day 2010-inflammatory bowel disease task force meeting. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:639–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burisch J, Munkholm P. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:942–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ng SC, Bernstein CN, Vatn MH, et al. Epidemiology and natural history task force of the International Organization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD). Geographical variability and environmental risk factors in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2013;62:630–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Victoria CR, Sassak LY, Nunes HR. Incidence and prevalence rates of inflammatory bowel diseases, in midwestern of São Paulo state, Brazil. Arq Gastroenterol. 2009;46:20–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrukh A, Mayberry JF. Inflammatory bowel disease in Hispanic communities: a concerted south American approach could identify the etiology of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014;51:271–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Parente JM, Coy CS, Campelo V, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in an underdeveloped region of northeastern Brazil. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1197–206.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Secretaria de Saúde do Estado do Espírito Santo. Assistência Farmacêutica-Farmácia Cidadã. https://farmaciacidada.es.gov.br/farmacia-cidada-estadual. Acessed 3 Jan 2015.
  13. Ministério da Saúde(BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Portaria SAS/MS n° 2.981, de 04 de novembro de 2002, Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas da Retocolite Ulcerativa. http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2014/abril/02/pcdt-retocolite-ulcerativa-livro-2002.pdf Accessed 3 Jan 2015.
  14. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Portaria SAS/MS nº 711, de 17 de dezembro de 2010. Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas da Doença de Crohn. http://portalarquivos.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2015/abril/17/Minuta-de-Portaria-SAS-PCDT-Doen--a-de-Crohn-30-09-2014---RETIFICADO.pdf. Acessed 3 Jan 2015.
  15. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). http://brasil500anos.ibge.gov.br/territorio-brasileiro-e-povoamento/italianos/regioes-de-destino.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2015.
  16. Instituo Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo 2014. ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Estimativas_de_Populacao/Estimativas_2014/estimativa_TCU_2014_20170614.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2015.
  17. Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a working party of the 2005 Montreal world congress of gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005;19(Suppl A):5A–36A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Appleyard CB, Hernández G, Rios-Bedoya CF. Basic epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Puerto Rico. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:106–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Burisch J, Pedersen N, Čuković-Čavka S, et al. East-west gradient in the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe: the ECCO-EpiCom inception cohort. Gut. 2014;63:588–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinubing-Júnior H, Ferreira LC, Pinho MSL, et al. Perfil dos pacientes ambulatoriais com doenças inflamatórias intestinais/Outpatients profile with inflammatory bowel disease. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2011;24:200–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Benchimol EI, Fortinsky KJ, Gozdyra P, et al. Epidemiology of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of international trends. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:423–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cuffari C. Inflammatory bowel disease in children: a pediatrician's perspective. Minerva Pediatr. 2006;58:139–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J, et al. European Crohn's and colitis organization (ECCO). The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis. 2010;4:7–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1785–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Park SJ, Kim WH, Cheon JH. Clinical characteristics and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a comparison of eastern and western perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:11525–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Mowat C, Cole A, Windsor A, et al. IBD section of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2011;60:571–607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dignass A, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, et al. European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO). The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Current management. J Crohns Colitis. 2010;4:28–62. Erratum in: J Crohns Colitis 2010; 4: 353. Dosage error in article Text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Terdiman JP, Gruss CB, Heidelbaugh JJ, et al. AGA Institute clinical practice and quality management committee. American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on the use of thiopurines, methotrexate, and anti-TNF-α biologic drugs for the induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:1459–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bernstein CN. Treatment of IBD: where we are and where we are going. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:114–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brasil Escola. "Aspectos da população do Espírito Santo". http://brasilescola.uol.com.br/brasil/aspectos-populacao-espirito-santo.htm Accessed 3 Aug 2015.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement