- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Intra-esophageal whitish mass – a challenging diagnosis
© Ciobanu et al. 2015
Received: 15 March 2015
Accepted: 12 August 2015
Published: 19 August 2015
Whitish intraluminal esophageal masses might represent the endoscopic feature of a bezoar or a pedunculated tumor, most likely a fibrovascular polyp, without exclusion of other mesenchymal tumors (leiomyoma, lipoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyosarcoma, granular cell tumor). If a process of dystrophic calcification is also encountered the differential diagnosis can be a challenge even after histological analysis, as it is highlighted by our case.
A 65-year-old female whom took lactate calcium tablets for 5 years presented with progressive dysphagia. A whitish esophageal mass with an appearance of a pharmacobezoar was detected at esophagoscopy. A pedunculated tumor was considered in the differential diagnosis, but the imagistic studies ruled out a pedicle. This intraluminal esophageal mass highly suggestive for a pharmacobezoar was endoscopically removed. The challenge of correct diagnosis was raised by histological examination performed after immersion into trichloracetic acid for decalcification. The identification of hyaline fibrous tissue, with numerous crystalline basophils deposits of minerals, rare fibrocytes and very few vessels brought in discussion a mesenchymal originating mass, most likely a fibrovascular polyp, even the pedicle was not detected.
Based on our challenging and difficult to diagnose case we proposed an uncommon evolution: auto-amputation and calcification of an esophageal mesenchymal originating tumor (most likely a fibrovascular polyp).
Esophageal intra-luminal whitish mass might represent the endoscopic appearance of a bezoar or a fibrovascular polyp, without exclusion of other mesenchymal tumors with intraluminal polypoid aspect (leiomyosarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyoma).
Bezoars, retained concretions of indigestible foreign materials that accumulate and conglomerate are rarely seen in the esophagus. Esophageal pharmaco-bezoars are associated with structural or functional abnormalities of the esophagus in addition to specific medication: antihypertensive calcium blockers , clomipramine  or glucomannan (polysaccharide) . Esophageal bezoars were reported in patients with enteral feeding, most of them also receiving sucralphate or aluminum hydroxide antacids, medication known to cause bezoars .
The pedunculated esophageal masses are frequently represented by fibrovascular polyps, considered tumor-like lesions [5, 6]. This lesion, unique to esophagus, developed from the upper esophagus; may be due to redundant folds that get pulled down by force of swallowing [7, 8]. It is defined as a polyp composed of a core of fibrous or fibro-adipose connective tissue and blood vessels covered by thickened but otherwise normal squamous epithelium [5, 6]. It is also called fibroma, fibrolipoma, fibromyxoma and may actually be an acquired malformation or hamartoma [7, 8]; it is not included in the mesenchymal tumors of the esophagus by World Health Organisation . Autoamputation of polypoid lesions in the gastrointestinal tract is rare phenomenon, and it presumably occurs due to ischemic necrosis of the polyp by peristalsis-induced torsion or tension , being described for gastric polyps  and colonic lypoma [10, 12], not described for fibrovascular polyps of the esophagus.
The mesenchymal tumors (leiomyoma, lipoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomiosarcoma, granular cell tumor, haemangioma) are defined as a group of nonepithelial tumors with variable histogenesis, including smooth muscle, stromal (Cajal) cells, fibroblastic/myofibroblastic, endothelial origin . They develop as intramural nodules, frequently detected as submucosal lesions at endoscopy. They have different patterns of growth: leiomyoma frequently develop intramurally with mediastinal extension, but leiomyosarcoma might present as polypoid intraluminal masses [9, 13].
We present a challenging diagnosis regarding an intraluminal esophageal whitish mass, initially supposed to be a bezoar based on macroscopic appearance with the lack of a pedicle, but not sustained by histological analysis. The presence of hyaline fibrous tissue, with numerous crystalline basophils deposits of minerals, rare fibrocytes and very few vessels brought in discussion a mesenchymal originating mass, most likely a fibrovascular polyp, with an uncommon evolution: autoamputation and calcification.
One month later the patient was asymptomatic. The endoscopy did not revealed an enlarged esophagus, the appearance of the esophageal mucosa was normal (without ulcerations) and no diverticula was identified. No motility disturbances were found on esophageal manometry.
Based on the clinical course, the history of calcium lactate intake and histological appearance a diagnosis of an esophageal benign mesenchymal originating mass (most probably a fibrovascular polyp) auto-amputated and calcified was formulated.
After the first endoscopy a challenging differential diagnosis process was carried out.
The intra-luminal whitish mass might have represented a bezoar developed in an esophageal diverticula with secondary ulceration of the diverticular mucosa, a fibrovascular polyp or a mesenchymal tumor (leiomyosarcoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumor) presented as a polypoid intraluminal mass with decubitus lesions on the opposite mucosa. As a pedicle was not documented on endoscopy by hadling a polypectomy snare around the mass, on X series or on computer tomography scan, a bezoar was considered. Other arguments for this initial diagnosis were the history of calcium tablets intake and the calcified mass described by imagistic studies.
The calcium lactate tablets have not been associated to a pharmacobezoar development in the literature, but calcium polystyrene sulfonate, an exchange resin used to treat hyperkalemia was reported to cause an ileum bezoar . Although the paraclinical examinations did not describe a significant distal esophageal stricture, a previous diverticula could have been favored the bezoar development.
The radiological examination can frequently identify the bezoar and the associated conditions that predispose to bezoar development: epiphrenic diverticulum , strictures or motility disturbances like achalasia . Regarding the submucosal pedunculated masses, barium studies are commonly used, but they have a low sensitivity to identify the pedicle [17–20]. The radiological correct diagnosis of fibrovascular polyp can usually be suggested by the presence of a smooth, sausage-like defect with a discrete bulbous tip . The computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can identify in the most cases the exact site of origin of the pedicle of the fibrovascular polyps . On computer tomography, the mesenchymal pedunculated tumors may appear as soft-tissue-attenuated lesions, with a paucity of fat, that expand the lumen of the esophagus .
The diagnostic challenge in our case continued in histological analysis. The presence of capillary structures, rare fibroblasts and collagen fibers were in favor of a connective tissue mass, most probable a fibrovascular polyp that suffered long process of calcification, argued by the numerous crystalline basophils deposits of minerals. The histological analysis excluded other mesenchymal tumors with intraluminal growth pattern (leiomyosarcoma, leiomyoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor). The lack of adipocytes ruled out atypical lipomatous tumor that could mimick giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus .
For the differential diagnosis the most important raised question was if the vascular-connective tissue could have been found in a calcified alimentary bezoar? The connective tissue in this hypothesis must have been found at the periphery of the mass, but in our case it was homogeneous distributed into the calcified mass. For an ingested fibrous mass retained in a normal esophagus and than calcified there are no sufficient clinical and physiological arguments.
A serious contra-argument for a fibrovascular polyp is the lack of a pedicle (not identify at endoscopy, imagistic study or anatomo-pathological examination). But the presence of the vascular connective tissue described on histology is an important argument for its previous existence. In this case an auto-amputation process might be supposed.
The diverticula initially supposed to be the cause for the bezoar formation was actually secondary to mass compression. One month from the mass removal, the diverticula was not more identified at endoscopy, being another argument for an esophageal mesenchimal originating mass and a contraargument for a bezoar.
Based on our challenging and difficult to diagnose case we proposed a natural uncommon evolution for an esophageal mesenchymal originating mass (most likely a fibrovascular polyp): auto-amputation and calcification.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
This paper was published under the frame of European Social Found, Human Resources Development Operational Programme 2007–2013, project number POSTDRU 159/1.5/138776: TRANSCENT.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Prisant LM, Spaulding VC. Antihypertensive pharmacobezoar. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006;8:296–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Höjer J, Personne M. Endoscopic removal of slow release clomipramine bezoars in two cases of acute poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008;46:317–9. doi:10.1080/15563650701378738.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vanderbeek PB, Fasano C, O’Malley G, Hornstein J. Esophageal obstruction from a hygroscopic pharmacobezoar containing glucomannan. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45:80–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcus EL, Arnon R, Sheynkman A, Caine YG, Lysy J. Esophageal obstruction due to enteral feed bezoar: a case report and literature review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;2:352–6. doi:10.4253/wjge.v2.i10.352.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stout AP, Lattes R. Tumors of the esophagus. In: Atlas of tumor pathology, section V, fascicle 20. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1957. p. 25–32.Google Scholar
- Watanabe H, Jass JR, Sobin LH. World Health Organization: histological typing of oesophageal and gastric tumors. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1990. p. 16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choong CK, Meyers BF. Benign esophageal tumors: introduction, incidence, classification, and clinical features. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;151:3–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee SY, Chan WH, Sivanandan R, Lim DT, Wong WK. Recurrent giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3697–700.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen M, Fletcher CDM, Kingblom LG, Tsui WMS. Mesenchymal tumours of th esophagus. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC; 2010. p. 35–7.Google Scholar
- Jeong HK, Cho SB, Seo TJ, Lee KR, Lee WS, Kim HS, et al. Autoamputation of a giant colonic lipoma. Gut Liver. 2011;5(3):380–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nakajima T, Kamano T, Watanabe K, Meguro H, Shibasaki K. A gastric hyperplastic polyp observed endoscopically before and after autoamputation. Endoscopy. 2003;35(12):1069–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radhi JM. Lipoma of the colon: self amputation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1981–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hatch 3rd GF, Wertheimer-Hatch L, Hatch KF, Davis GB, Blanchard DK, Foster Jr RS, et al. Tumors of the esophagus. World J Surg. 2000;24(4):401–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai TP, Yang CW, Siaop FY, Yen HH. Calcium polystyrene sulfonate bezoar in the ileum: diagnosis and treatment with double-balloon endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E378–9. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1344835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen YC, Tsai MC, Chen TY, Lin CC. Esophageal bezoar in a patient with esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E193–4. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1344127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim KH, Choi SC, Seo GS, Kim YS, Choi CS, Im CJ. Esophageal bezoar in a patient with achalasia: case report and literature review. Gut Liver. 2010;4:106–9. doi:10.5009/gnl.2010.4.1.106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jang KM, Lee KS, Lee SJ, Kim EA, Kim TS, Han D, et al. The spectrum of benign esophageal lesions: imaging findings. Korean J Radiol. 2002;3:199–210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chourmouzi D, Drevelegas A. Giant fibrovascular polyp of the oesophagus: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2008;2:337. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-2-337.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yannopoulos P, Manes K. Giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus - imaging techniques can localize, preoperatively, the origin of the stalk and designate the way of surgical approach: a case report. Cases J. 2009;2:6854. doi:10.4076/1757-1626-2-6854.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Madeira FP, Justo JW, Wietzycoski CR, Burttet LM, Kruel CD, da Rosa AP. Giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus: a diagnostic challenge. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013;26:71–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boni A, Lisovsky M, Dal Cin P, Rosenberg AE, Srivastava A. Atypical lipomatous tumor mimicking giant fibrovascular polyp of the esophagus: report of a case and a critical review of literature. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:1165–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar