Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis in Taiwan

  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4, 5 and
  • 4, 5Email author
BMC Gastroenterology201515:40

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0267-5

©  Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

  • Received: 19 December 2014
  • Accepted: 11 March 2015
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis in Taiwanese general population.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2011, consecutive asymptomatic subjects undergoing a health check-up were evaluated by colonoscopy. The colorectal diverticulosis was assessed, and a medical history and demographic data were obtained from each subject. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to search the risk factors of colorectal diverticulosis.

Results

Of the 1899 asymptomatic subjects, the prevalence of colorectal diverticulosis was 13.5%. On univariate logistic regression analysis, age over 60 years old, male, adenomatous polyp, current smoking and heavy alcohol consumption were significantly associated with diverticulosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age over 60 years old (relative risk [RR], 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-6.47), adenomatous polyps (RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.18-4.61) and heavy alcohol consumption (RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.08) were independent predictors for colorectal diverticulosis.

Conclusions

The prevalence of asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis was 13.5% in Taiwan. Age over 60 years old, adenomatous polyp and heavy alcohol consumption may affect the risk of development of the disease.

Keywords

  • Colorectal diverticulosis
  • Asymptomatic
  • Colonoscopy
  • Health check-up

Background

A diverticulum is a herniation through a weak site of the bowel wall that produces a small outpouching [1]. Although largely asymptomatic, this condition constitutes a considerable public health burden. It is estimated that 10% to 30% of patients with diverticulosis will suffer from complications such as diverticulitis and gastrointestinal bleeding and the associated mortality is estimated at 23,600 death per year in Europe [2,3]. Recently, diverticular disease is also found to be associated with an increased risk of subsequent arterial and venous thromboembolic events [4]. Identification of the risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis could provide both risk stratification and development of risk reduction strategies.

Colorectal diverticulosis shows both geographic and ethnic variability. It is rare in Africa and Asia but common in the United States, Europe and Australia [5,6]. In Western countries, colonic diverticula occur mainly in the sigmoid [7,8], whereas in Asian patients, the right side of the colon is more commonly involved [9,10]. Several risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis in the Western countries have been indentified previously such as old age, moderate to heavy alcohol use, constipation and lower fiber diet [11-13]. However, only a few studies have been conducted to investigate the risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis in Asian countries. Recently, a cross-sectional study from Japan showed an association between colorectal diverticulosis and old age, heavy alcohol consumption and smoking, and atherosclerosis disease [14] but a prospective study in Korea showed no association between colorectal diverticulosis and body mass index (BMI), lower fiber diet and a history of cigarette smoking [15].

Currently, the risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis remain unclear and the results of risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis in Asian population are quite conflicting. Some people in Taiwan underwent health check-up including colonoscopy at their own expense because of various reasons. We therefore conducted this cross-sectional study to investigate the risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis in Taiwan.

Methods

Subjects

From January 2009 to December 2011, consecutive asymptomatic subjects aged ≥ 20 years old undergoing a colonoscopy during a health check-up were included into this study. The subjects were excluded if they reported symptoms of lower gastrointestinal tract disease including rectal bleeding, a marked change in bowel habits, or lower abdominal pain that would normally require medical evaluation. Other exclusion criteria were a history of colitis, colorectal polyps or colorectal cancer, prior colonic surgery, undergoing a sigmoidscopy, a colonoscopy, or a barium enema within the previous 10 years. The study protocol was approved by Institutional Review Board at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and all participants provided written informed consent.

Study design

A complete history and physical examination were performed for each subject undergoing the health check-up. All subjects were carefully queried regarding the presence of abdominal symptoms in the previous 1 month. Subjects who responded negatively were classified as asymptomatic subjects and were enrolled into this study. All the participants received anthropometric and blood biochemical tests including fasting plasma glucose, serum triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)–cholesterol level, and underwent total colonoscopy. Colonoscopies were performed by three experienced endoscopists (King TM, Wang JH, and Hsu CW) using the Olympus PCF-Q240AL and PCF-Q260AL endoscopy (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) after the subjects had fasted overnight. Bowel preparation was performed with oral saline lexative following the protocol of diagnostic colonoscopy. The patients were carefully examined for colorectal mucosal lesion. If colorectal diverticula were observed, their location and type was recorded carefully. Distribution type was defined as the following: right-side colon, involving the cecum, ascending colon, or transverse colon; left- side colon, involving the splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, or rectum; or bilateral, involving the entire colon. Colorectal polyp was defined as a protuberance into the lumen from the normally flat colonic mucosa. All visible polyps were removed and examined histologically by the pathologist. The pathology types of colorectal polyps were subsequently categorized into hyperplastic polyps and adenomatous polyps.

To assess the relationship between clinical characteristics and asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis, the following data were recorded for each subject: age; gender; educational status; consumption of tobacco, alcohol, coffee, tea, spicy foods or betel nut, exercise habit, whether vegetarian or not and long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). All variables were categorized for data analyses.

Statistical analysis

The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was employed to investigate the relationship between the rate of colorectal diverticulosis and clinical characteristics. These variables included the following: gender; age (<39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 or >70 years); education status (<10, 10–12, or >12 years); BMI (<25, 25–30, or >30); regular NSAID use at least 1 year (yes or no); colorectal polyps (hyperplastic polyps or adenomatous polyps); smoking status (no, former smoking, current smoking); consumption of alcohol ,coffee, tea or spicy foods and exercise habit (no, ≤ 3 times per week, or >3 times per week); betel nut habit and vegetarian (yes or no). Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition for South Asians and Chinese. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Significant variables revealed by univariate analysis were subsequently assessed by a stepwise logistic regression method to identify independent clinical factors predicting the presence of colorectal diverticulosis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, II, USA ).

Results

Patient demographics and colonoscopic characteristics

From January 2009 to December 2011, 1899 asymptomatic subjects (mean age, 52.8 ± 10.6 years; age range, 20–86 years; male/female, 1203/696) was recruited into this study. Among them, 256 subjects (13.5%) had colorectal diverticulosis. Diverticula were located predominately in the right-side of the colon in 52.3% (n = 134), left-side in 25% (n = 64), and bilaterally in 22.7% (n = 58) of the subjects (Table 1). The prevalence of colorectal diverticulosis increased with age (Figure 1). The prevalence of hyperplastic polyps and adenomatous polyps were 11.1%, 16.1%, respectively.
Table 1

Demographics and endoscopic findings of asymptomatic health check-up subjects (N = 1,899)

Clinical characteristics

Age, n (%)

 Mean (SD) (years)

52.8 (10.6)

   < 39

193 (10.2)

  40-49

557 (29.3)

  50-59

681 (35.9)

  60-69

337 (17.8)

   > 70

131 (6.8)

Height, cm

165.8 (8.2)

Weight, kg

66.2 (12.3)

Gender, n (%)

 Men

1203 (63.2)

 Women

696 (36.8)

Body mass index, n (%)

 Mean (SD)

23.9 (3.4)

  < 25

1233 (64.9)

 25-30

573 (30.2)

  > 30

93 (4.9)

Education level, n (%)

 Middle school

144 (7.6)

 High school

799 (42.1)

 University

641 (33.7)

 Graduate school

315 (16.6)

Yearly income (US dollars), n (%)

  < 10,000

182 (9.6)

 10,000 - 30,000

984 (51.8)

  > 30,000

733 (38.6)

Colonscopic findings, n (%)

 Hyperplastic polyp

210 (11.1)

 Adenomatous polyp

305 (16.1)

 Diverticulosis

256 (13.5)

 Location

 

  Right side only

134 (52.3)

  Left side only

64 (25.0)

  Both sides

58 (22.7)

Figure 1
Figure 1

Prevalence of asymptomatic diverticulosis stratified by age group.

Risk factors for the development of colorectal diverticulosis

Table 2 showed the results of univariate analysis for the risk factors of colorectal diverticulosis. Current smoking, old age, male gender, adenomatous polyps and heavy alcohol consumption were significantly associated with the presence of colorectal diverticulosis (p = 0.045, 0.005, 0.001, 0.002, <0.001 respectively). The subjects with and without colorectal diverticulosis had comparable education level, BMI, coffee, tea, spicy food consumption, betel nut chewing, exercise habit, vegetarian, metabolic syndrome status, and NSAID use. Multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression showed that age greater than 60 years (RR, 2.57, 95% CI, 1.64-6.47), heavy alcohol consumption (RR, 1.82, 95% CI, 1.04-3.08) and presence of adenomatous polyps (RR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.18-4.61) were independent predictors for asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis (Table 3).
Table 2

Univariate analysis of the risk factors for the development of colorectal diverticulosis

Principal parameter

Diverticulosis (+)

Diverticulosis (−)

Pvalue

Sex, n (%)

  

0.001

 Men

193 (75.4)

1010 (61.5)

 

 Women

63 (24.6)

633 (38.5)

 

Age (yr), n (%)

  

0.005

  < 39

9 (3.5)

184 (11.2)

 

 40-49

65 (25.4)

492 (29.9)

 

 50-59

89 (34.8)

592 (36.0)

 

 60-69

61 (23.8)

276 (16.8)

 

  > 70

32 (12.5)

99 (6.1)

 

Education (yr), n (%)

 

0.136

  < 10

56 (21.8)

338 (20.6)

 

 10-12

103 (40.1)

723 (44.0)

 

  > 12

97 (38.1)

582 (35.4)

 

BMI,* n (%)

  

0.248

  < 25

161 (62.9)

1072 (65.2)

 

 25-30

80 (31.2)

493 (30.1)

 

  > 30

15 (5.9)

78 (4.7)

 

NSAID† use, n (%)

 

0.636

 No

247 (96.5)

1572 (95.7)

 

 Yes

9 (3.5)

71 (4.3)

 

Colon polyps

 

0.002

 None

146 (57.1)

1233 (75.3)

 

 Hyperplastic polyp

38 (14.8)

172 (10.5)

 

 Adenomatous polyp

72 (28.1)

233 (14.2)

 

Smoking status, n (%)

 

0.045

 Never smoking

144 (56.3)

1068 (65.0)

 

 Former smoking

33 (12.9)

238 (14.5)

 

 Current smoking

79 (30.8)

337 (20.5)

 

Alcohol drinking, n (%)

 

<0.001

 No

155 (60.6)

1231 (74.9)

 

 ≦ 3 times per week

55 (21.6)

320 (19.5)

 

  > 3 times per week

46 (17.8)

92 (5.6)

 

Coffee drinking, n (%)

 

0.724

 No

144 (56.3)

907 (55.2)

 

 ≦ 3 times per week

46 (18.0)

311 (18.9)

 

  > 3 times per week

66 (25.7)

425 (25.9)

 

Tea drinking, n (%)

 

0.486

 No

98 (38.2)

677 (41.2)

 

 ≦ 3 times per week

53 (20.6)

311 (18.9)

 

  > 3 times per week

105 (41.2)

655 (39.9)

 

Spicy foods consumption, n (%)

0.269

 No

137 (53.4)

876 (53.3)

 

 ≦ 3 times per week

74 (28.9)

434 (26.4)

 

  > 3 times per week

45 (17.7)

333 (20.3)

 

Betel nut use, n (%)

 

0.428

 No

238 (92.8)

1556 (94.7)

 

 Yes

18 (7.2)

87 (5.3)

 

Exercise habit, n (%)

 

0.667

 No

95 (37.0)

550 (33.5)

 

 ≦ 3 times per week

72 (28.2)

490 (29.8)

 

  > 3 times per week

89 (34.8)

603 (36.7)

 

Vegetarian, n (%)

 

0.375

 No

248 (96.9)

1579 (96.1)

 

 Yes

8 (3.1)

64 (3.9)

 

Metabolic syndrome, n (%)

 

0.369

 No

164 (63.9)

1099 (66.9)

 

 Yes

92 (36.1)

544 (33.1)

 

*BMI = body mass index, indicating weight in kg divided by body surface area. †NSAID, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug.

Table 3

Multi-variate analysis of risk factors for colorectal diverticulosis

Variable

Relative risk

95% CI†

Pvalue

Age >60 y/o

2.57

1.64-6.47

0.001

Alcohol drinking >3 times per week

1.82

1.04-3.08

0.023

Colorectal Adenomatous polyps

2.18

1.18-4.61

0.005

†CI := confidence interval.

Discussion

The current study demonstrated that the prevalence of colorectal diverticulosis were 13.5% in asymptomatic Taiwanese. Old age, heavy alcohol consumption and adenomatous polyps are risk factors of colorectal diverticulosis. To our knowledge, this is the first work investigating the prevalence and risk factors of colorectal diverticulosis in an asymptomatic Taiwanese population based on colonoscopic findings.

The location of colorectal diverticulosis in subjects from this study was also different from that of Western countries [16]. In Western countries, diverticula occur mainly at left side of the colon and only 15% occur in the right side [10]. In this study, diverticula were primarily located in the right side of the colon (52.3%) and only 25% were in the left side. In other Asian countries, diverticula are also predominantly located in the right side of the colon [17]. Why diverticulosis is predominantly right-sided in Asian people compared with other populations is unclear. It is possible that the sensitivity of the colon to environmental factors varies with the characteristics such as the length and muscle thickness of the colon, body weight, and the structure of the neural and humoral systems [6]. The incidence of colorectal diverticulosis appears to increase with increasing age [11]. In Western countries, the prevalence of colorectal diverticulosis was less than 10% in individuals younger than 40 years old and greater than 50% in individuals older than 70 years old [16]. In our study, the prevalence of colorectal diverticulosis also increased with age (4.7% in individuals younger than 40 years old vs. 24.4% in individuals older than 70 years old). It could be explained by the fact that the tensile strength of the colon wall declines with the increase of age [1]. In addition, abnormal thickness of muscles of colonic wall, including collagen cross-linking, is promoted by abnormal colonic movement due to a lack of dietary fiber and results in increase of intraluminal colonic pressure of the thickened muscles which changes with the increase of age [17].

This study revealed a strong positive association between colorectal adenomatous polyps and diverticulosis by univariate and multivariate analysis. The association of colorectal diverticulosis and the risk of colorectal adenomas is controversial. Morini et al. found significantly more adenoma/advanced adenoma in the sigmoid colon of patients with diverticula than in controls in a study of Italian patients undergoing colonoscopy [18]. In a retrospective study of Japanese patients undergoing total colonoscopy, Hierta et al. found that on multivariate analysis adjusted for age and sex there was a significant association between colorectal diverticulosis and colon polyps in all locations [19]. In contrast, Meurs-Szojda et al. found in 4,241 patients that there was no relation between patients with diverticulosis and a higher incidence of colorectal polyps when using an age-stratified analysis [20]. Colorectal adenomatous polyps are apparently not a causative factor of colorectal diverticulosis but may be associated with diverticulosis by sharing one or more common risk factors such as age, high-fiber diet, and alcohol.

Our study also showed that consumption of alcoholic drinks three times or more per week was an independent predictor for colorectal diverticulosis in asymptomatic subjects. A Danish study found a relative risk of 2 for alcoholics to have admissions due to colonic diverticular disease [21]. Song et al. revealed that alcohol drinkers were two times (RR:2.2) more likely to develop diverticulosis than nondrinkers when assessed by multivariate analysis in a colonoscopy-based study [15]. The exact mechanism whereby alcohol consumption could increase the risk of colorectal diverticulosis is unknown. However, an effect on colorectal motility by alcohol [22], a direct damaging effect via oxidative stress on colonic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) [23] or one mediated via the colonic flora’s alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) may play a role [24]. Berenson et al. reported that intravenous administration of alcohol consistently decreases rectosigmoid motor activity, which correlates inversely with serum alcohol levels in humans [25]. Furthermore, alcohol withdrawal in chronic alcohol users leads to significant improvement in colorectal transit time as a result of an exclusive increase in rectosigmoidal transit time [22].

Despite of the findings, this study had certain limitations. First, self-selection bias of the population in this trial was possible because all enrolled subjects underwent self-paid health examination, which usually indicated better economic status than the general population in Taiwan (Table 1). Second, the studied subjects may differ from the subjects in primary care hospital because our hospital is a tertiary care center. Third, the limited information on type and duration of alcohol use and the lack of a detailed dietary history with regard to fiber and fat intake might decrease the power of these factors.

Conclusion

The prevalence of colorectal diverticulosis is 13.5% in this cross-section study of asymptomatic Taiwanese subjects, with 52.3% of the cases on the right side of the colon. Advanced age and alcohol consumption are identifiable risk factors for the development of colorectal diverticulosis. These findings suggested that lifestyle modification including abstaining from alcohol might potentially decrease the risk of developing colorectal diverticulosis. Colorectal adenomatous polyps was also associated with the presence of colorectal diverticular disease but the causative relationship is vague. Further studies are warranted to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the association of alcohol consumption with the risk of colorectal diverticulosis.

Abbreviations

RR: 

Relative risk

CI: 

Confidence interval

BMI: 

Body mass index

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

NSAID: 

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ADH: 

Alcohol dehydrogenase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the colleagues in the Kaohsiung Medical University and Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. We also appreciate the cooperation of health checkup subjects.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, 81362, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Public Health, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, 803, Taiwan
(3)
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, 81362, Taiwan
(4)
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung 1 st Road, Kaohsiung City, 80424, Taiwan
(5)
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

References

  1. Simpson J, Scholefield JH, Spiller RC. Pathogenesis of colonic diverticula. Br J Surg. 2002;89(5):546–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Delvaux M. Diverticular disease of the colon in Europe:epidemiology, impact on citizen health and prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18 suppl 3:71–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lisa LS, Rusha M, Erica C, Brennan MR. Diverticular Disease as a Chronic Illness:Evolving Epidemiologic and Clinical Insights. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1486–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lisa LS, Rune E, Erzsébet HP, Pedersen L, Baron JA, Sørensen HT. Diverticular Disease Is Associated With Increased Risk of Subsequent Arterial and Venous Thromboembolic Events. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(10):1695–701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Martel J, Raskin JB, NDSG. History, incidence, and epidemiology of diverticulosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(10):1125–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nakaji S, Danjo K, Munakata A, Sugawara K, MacAuley D, Kernohan G, et al. Comparison of etiology of right-sided diverticula in Japan with that of left-sided diverticula in the west. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17(6):365–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Heise CP. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of diverticular disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(8):1309–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sheth AA, Longo W, Floch MH. Diverticular disease and diverticulitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(6):1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Coode PE, Chan KW, Chan YT. Polyps and diverticula of the large intestine: a necropsy survey in Hong Kong. Gut. 1985;26(10):1045–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Stollman NH, Raskin JB. Diverticular disease of the colon. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;29(3):241–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Parra-Blanco A. Colonic diverticular disease: pathophysiology and clinical picture. Digestion. 2006;73 Suppl 1:47–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Strate LL. Lifestyle factors and the course of diverticular disease. Dig Dis. 2012;30(1):35–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sharara AI, El-Halabi MM, Mansour NM, Malli A, Ghaith OA, Hashash JG, et al. Alcohol consumption is a risk factor for colonic diverticulosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(5):420–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Naoyoshi N, Ryota N, Takuro S, Yoshihiro K, Katsunori S, Shohei T, et al. Alcohol and Smoking Affect Risk of Uncomplicated Colonic Diverticulosis in Japan. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Song JH, Kim YS, Lee JH, Ok KS, Ryu SH, Lee JH, et al. Clinical characteristics of colonic diverticulosis in Korea: A prospective study. Korean J Intern Med. 2010;25(2):140–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Bogardus Jr ST. What do we know about diverticular disease? A brief overview. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40 Suppl 3:S108–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakada I, Ubukata H, Goto Y, Watanabe Y, Sato S, Tabuchi T, et al. Diverticular disease of the colon at a regional general hospital in Japan. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(7):755–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A, De Francesco V, Festa V, Barberani F, et al. Diverticular disease as a risk factor for sigmoid colon adenomas. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34(9):635–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirata T, Kawakami Y, Kinjo N, Arakaki S, Arakaki T, Hokama A, et al. Association between colonic polyps and diverticular disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(15):2411–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Meurs-Szojda MM, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Kuik DJ, Mulder CJ, Felt-Bersma RJ. Diverticulosis and diverticulitis form no risk for polyps and colorectal neoplasia in 4,241 colonoscopies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(10):979–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tonnesen H, Engholm G, Moller H. Association between alcoholism and diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 1999;86(8):1067–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bouchoucha M, Nalpas B, Berger M, Cugnenc PH, Barbier JP. Recovery from disturbed colonic transit time after alcohol withdrawal. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(2):111–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang C, Wang S, Qin J, Lv Y, Ma X, Liu C. Ethanol upregulates iNOS expression in colon through activation of nuclear factor-kappa B in rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(1):57–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seitz HK, Simanowski UA, Garzon FT, Rideout JM, Peters TJ, Koch A, et al. Possible role of acetaldehyde in ethanol-related rectal cocarcinogenesis in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(2):406–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Berenson MM, Avner DL. Alcohol inhibition of rectosigmoid motility in humans. Digestion. 1981;22(4):210–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us