Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eamonn Quigley |
1 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Mendall |
14 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Roger McCorry |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
16 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Mendall |
13 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Roger McCorry |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Roger McCorry |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
2 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Roger McCorry |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
15 Apr 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Apr 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-8-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.