Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

The addition of locust bean gum but not water delayed the gastric emptying rate of a nutrient semisolid meal in healthy subjects

BMC Gastroenterology20033:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-3-12

©  Darwiche et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

  • Received: 05 February 2003
  • Accepted: 06 June 2003
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Most of the previous studies regarding the effects of gel-forming fibres have considered the gastric emptying of liquid or solid meals after the addition of pectin or guar gum. The influence of locust bean gum, on gastric emptying of nutrient semisolid meals in humans has been less well studied, despite its common occurrence in foods. Using a standardised ultrasound method, this study was aimed at investigating if the gastric emptying in healthy subjects could be influenced by adding locust been gum, a widely used thickening agent, or water directly into a nutrient semisolid test meal.

Methods

The viscosity of a basic test meal (300 g rice pudding, 330 kcal) was increased by adding Nestargel (6 g, 2.4 kcal), containing viscous dietary fibres (96.5%) provided as seed flour of locust bean gum, and decreased by adding 100 ml of water. Gastric emptying of these three test meals were evaluated in fifteen healthy non-smoking volunteers, using ultrasound measurements of the gastric antral area to estimate the gastric emptying rate (GER).

Results

The median value of GER with the basic test meal (rice pudding) was estimated at 63 %, (range 47 to 84 %), (the first quartile = 61 %, the third quartile = 69 %). Increasing the viscosity of the rice pudding by adding Nestargel, resulted in significantly lower gastric emptying rates (p < 0.01), median GER 54 %, (range 7 to 71 %), (the first quartile = 48 %, the third quartile = 60 %). When the viscosity of the rice pudding was decreased (basic test meal added with water), the difference in median GER 65 %, (range 38 to 79 %), (the first quartile = 56 %, the third quartile = 71 %) was not significantly different (p = 0.28) compared to the GER of the basic test meal.

Conclusions

We conclude that the addition of locust bean gum to a nutrient semisolid meal has a major impact on gastric emptying by delaying the emptying rate, but that the addition of water to this test meal has no influence on gastric emptying in healthy subjects.

Keywords

  • Gastric Emptying
  • Real-time Ultrasound
  • Healthy humans
  • Dietary fiber
  • Viscous fiber
  • Semisolid meal

Background

Many factors are believed to affect gastric emptying, including the volume and energy density of the meal and its viscosity and particle size [1]. The blood glucose level, hyperinsulinemia, gender, certain drugs [2], body size [3], meal temperature [4], and smoking [5] could be other influencing factors. Dietary fibers has a number of metabolic effects, some of which are potentially useful in treating pathological conditions such as obesity, hypercholesterolaemia, and diabetes mellitus [6, 7]. They include a range of relatively poorly digested food substances mainly composed of non-starch polysaccharides. Generally dietary fibers sources can be grouped into two major types due to their quite different physiological effects: soluble (viscous and fermentable), and insoluble (non-viscous, slowly fermentable). Viscous gel-forming fiber's includes pectins and gums and these natural colloids are multi-branched hydrophilic substances having the capability of absorbing water readily and forming viscous solutions. Several studies indicate that the addition of viscous soluble fiber's to the meal [8–12] as well as fibre naturally present in food [13] reduce the gastric emptying rate and the glycemic response to a test meal. A delayed absorption due to increased viscosity of the intestinal content has been suggested to partly explain the reduced glycemic response in other studies [14, 15]. Despite the capability of the water soluble dietary fibres to form viscous solutions, it is not known if the reduction in gastric emptying is due to increased meal viscosity or effects on antroduodenal coordination by alteration in duodenal feedback from mucosal receptors. Most of the previous studies regarding the effects of gel-forming fibres have considered the gastric emptying of liquid or solid meals after the addition of pectin or guar gum. The influence of locust bean gum, on gastric emptying of nutrient semisolid meals in humans has been less well studied, despite its common occurrence in foods.

Torsdottir [16] have shown that an addition of 300 ml of water as a drink with the meal increased the glycemic response in healthy subjects and well-controlled non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients, thus suggesting that this effect might be mediated by an altered gastric emptying. Still, no measurements on gastric emptying were done to prove it. Contradictory results indicate that following ingestion of a solid-liquid meal, the stomach retains solid food predominantly in the proximal stomach, until the majority (about 80 %) of the liquid has emptied [17–19]. The gastric response to water added directly into a semisolid meal is less well studied and might involve different mechanisms for gastric emptying than emptying of mixed solids-liquid meals.

Using a standardised ultrasound method, this study was aimed at investigating if the gastric emptying in healthy subjects could be influenced by adding locust been gum to a nutrient semisolid test meal. The effect on gastric emptying by adding water directly into this semisolid test meal was also evaluated.

Methods

Test meals

Gastric emptying rates of three test meals with different viscosity were evaluated. The temperature of 15 randomly selected test meals was measured immediately prior to ingestion (mean temperature, 21.2 ± 1.9°C).

Basic test meal

The basic test meal consisted of 300 g rice pudding (330 kcal, provided as 10% protein, 58% carbohydrate and 32% fat), (Scan Risgrynsgröt, Scan Foods, Johanneshov, Sweden).

Basic test meal added with Nestargel

To increase the viscosity of this semisolid basic test meal 6 g Nestargel (2.4 kcal) was stirred into the basic test meal (rice pudding) homogeneously 2 hours before being served. The increase in viscosity was considerable and visible for the eye. Nestargel (Swedish Nestlé AB, Findus®, Bjuv, Sweden), usually used as a milk thickener for infants because of its water-binding capacity, is a low calorie product containing soluble, viscous dietary fibres (96.5%) provided as seed flour of locust bean gum (St. John's bread), and calciumlactate (3.5%). It does not contain gluten and is able to keep its capability to increase the viscosity of the test meal used in this study (rice pudding) despite changes in meal temperatures up to 50°C.

Basic test meal added with water

By adding 100 ml of water into the basic test meal, stirred homogeneously 2 hours before being served, a considerable decrease in the viscosity of the test meal was achieved.

Study design

Fifteen healthy non-smoking volunteers, all from the southern county of Sweden, 6 men and 9 women, aged 18 – 68 years (mean age 35 ± 17 years), with normal body mass indices (mean BMI 23.1 ± 3.0 kg/m2; range 18.1 – 26.8 kg/m2) and without symptoms of gastrointestinal disease, participated in the study. None of the subjects had a prior history of gastrointestinal surgery (except for appendectomy), were on any medication (including birth control medication) or did use snuff. On each study day any current symptoms attributable to the gastrointestinal tract were noted, and the fasting blood glucose checked for normal concentrations using finger-prick capillary blood samples. Subjects reporting temporary abnormal defecation such as constipation or diarrhea [20] were examined on another occasion when these conditions were normalized. At three separate mornings, the subjects were served the test meals in a random order as a breakfast, after an overnight fast (8 hours). The test meals were ingested within five minutes and the ultrasound examinations were done in the same room between 8:00 and 10:00 AM. All subjects obtained written information prior to the study and were aware of the possibility of withdrawing from the study at any time they desired.

Measurement of gastric emptying rate

Gastric emptying was assessed using a previously described standardized ultrasound method [21, 22]. The subjects were examined with a Hitachi EBU 400 (Hitachi, Tarrytown, NY) ultrasound instrument with an abdominal 3.5 MHz transducer. Two examiners assessed all 15 subjects and, for the examiners, the study was double blind with respect to the test products. When studied, all subjects were in a supine position with the ultrasound transducer applied with minimal abdominal compression, but between the examinations the subjects were resting seated in a chair. Gastric emptying was monitored indirectly by determining the longitudinal (D1) and anteroposterior (D2) diameters of a single section of the gastric antrum. The intragastric volume was assumed to be directly proportional to the cross-sectional area of the antrum [23], which was measured at the longitudinal scan at the level of the abdominal aorta and the left lobe of the liver. At each observation three measurements were taken using the mean values of the longitudinal (D1mean) and anteroposterior (D2mean) diameters to calculate the antral area. The antral cross-sectional area (AAntrum) was calculated in all subjects using the following formula:

AAntrum = Π × D1mean × D2mean / 4

The measurements of the gastric antrum (on average lasting between 1 – 3 minutes) were taken 15 and 90 minutes after the end of meal ingestion. Gastric emptying rate (GER) was estimated and expressed as the percent reduction in antral cross-sectional area from 15 to 90 minutes calculated as follows:

GER = [(A-area 90 min/ A-area 15 min)-1] × 100

Statistical Analysis

For each subject and type of test meal the gastric emptying rate (GER) was calculated, and the values presented as median values with range and quartiles (q1 – q3). These data were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and statistical analysis were carried out for the GER, using a two-sided test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. The median changes of the GER (Δmedian) for the rice pudding after increasing (Δmediani) / decreasing (Δmediand) the viscosity were calculated and expressed with ranges. All statistical calculations were performed in SigmaStat 2.0 for Windows®.

Results

The median value of GER with the basic test meal (rice pudding) was estimated at 63 %, (range 47 to 84 %), (q1 = 61 %, q3 = 69 %). Increasing the viscosity of the rice pudding by adding Nestargel, resulted in significantly lower gastric emptying rates (p < 0.01), median GER 54 %, (range 7 to 71 %), (q1 = 48 %, q3 = 60 %), (Figure 1). Individual GER values showed a decreased gastric emptying in all but two subjects and a median decrease in GER with 11 % (Δmediani = -11%), (range -40 to 16 %), after the addition of Nestargel to the rice pudding (Figure 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Gastric emptying of rice pudding, rice pudding with added Nestargel and rice pudding with added water, estimated as gastric emptying rate (GER), in healthy subjects. The median, minimum (Min), and maximum (Max) values and the values of the first (q1) and third (q3) quartiles are shown. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Individual values of gastric emptying of rice pudding and rice pudding with added Nestargel, estimated as gastric emptying rate (GER), in healthy subjects.

A wide spread in the GER were noted when the viscosity of the rice pudding was decreased (basic test meal added with water), showing higher gastric emptying rates in 6 subjects, still lower rates in 9 subjects (Figure 3). The median change in GER indicated a decrease in GER with 6 % (Δmediand = -6 %), (range -23 to 24 %), but the difference in GER 65 %, (range 38 to 79 %), (q1 = 56 %, q3 = 71 %) was nonsignificant (p = 0.28) compared to the GER of the basic test meal (Figure 1).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Individual values of gastric emptying of rice pudding and rice pudding with added water, estimated as gastric emptying rate (GER), in healthy subjects.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that the addition of locust bean gum but not water significantly influences the gastric emptying rate of a nutrient semisolid meal in healthy subjects. Despite the addition of only 6 g Nestargel to the rice pudding (basic test meal), which is less than 2 % of the total test meal weight, the individual GER values showed a decreased gastric emptying in all but two subjects and a median decrease in GER with 11 % (Figure 2). The effect of locust bean gum agrees with previous results of other viscous fibers, such as pectin and guar gum. Actually, almost all previous studies regarding the effects of gel-forming fibers have considered the gastric emptying of liquid or solid meals after the addition of pectin or guar gum. The influence of locust bean gum on gastric emptying of a nutrient semisolid meal in humans has been less well studied previously, despite its common occurrence in foods. Locust bean gum (St. John's bread, carob seed gum), the gum extract from carob seed (Ceratonia siliqua), is widely used as a thickening and stabilizing agent in food (e.g. ice cream, yogurt, mayonnaise, ketchup, marmalades, soups, desserts, sauces, bakery products, processed cheese and other) as well as a pharmaceutics agent (e.g. gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants and children). Since locust bean gum is not digested or absorbed in the stomach or the small bowel and the caloric content in the 6 g Nestargel (2.4 kcal) added to the basic test meal was minimal, a caloric influence of Nestargel on gastric emptying was interpreted as insignificant in this study. The preparing time and the meal temperature might influence the viscosity of the water soluble fibers in the meal. The preparing procedure was therefore identical each time (the fibers stirred into the rice pudding, without heating, 2 hours before ingestion). Furthermore, the gastric motility might be influenced by meal temperature [4], but as the mean temperature of the test meals used in this study, measured immediately prior to ingestion, showed only very slight variation (mean temperature, 21.2 ± 1.9°C) such a possible influence was interpreted as insignificant.

Locust bean gum has been shown to manage [24] or fail [25] in decreasing the postprandial glucose response in non-insulin-dependent diabetes patients. Previously, it has been shown that the effect of fiber-enriched wheat bran (Fiberform), added to a semisolid meal consisting of wheatmeal porridge and juice, caused an accumulation of the meal within the proximal stomach [26]. Assuming a similar effect of locust bean gum, this might delay the time for the postprandial antral area to reach its maximum value, giving a lower 15 min postprandial antral area and a wider 90 min postprandial antral area, depending on the time necessary for the proximal part of the stomach (the fundus) to deliver the food to the lower part of the stomach (the antrum), consequently reducing the value of the GER. A study on healthy volunteers, using magnetic resonance imaging, showed that the gastric response to increased viscosity of a non-nutrient locust bean gum water solution was rapid intragastric dilution, causing a reduction of the initial large difference in viscosity [27]. This rapid dilution minimized the differences in the gastric emptying rates resulting in a minimal delay of gastric emptying. Despite that viscosity varied 1000-fold between the solutions used in that study, emptying rates differed by a factor of only 1.3. This dilution response was suggested to be either due to salivation or acid secretion. However, the subjects were intubated with a nasogastric tube during the trial and intubation could influence gastric motility [28]. In the present study no intubation technique was used and the meal served, a nutrient semisolid test meal, was more representative of an ordinary breakfast meal, at least in Sweden. This is an important fact since the increased outflow resistance due to pylorospasm and altered antroduodenal motility probably is much more important in nutrient than non-nutrient meals [29, 30]. It has been suggested that acid secretion is lower in diabetic patient, probably due to vagal neuropathy [31, 32]. Such possible differences in gastric juice secretion between diabetic patients, with vagal neuropathy and gastroparesis, and healthy subjects might limit the capability of the stomach to reduce the viscosity of the gastric content resulting in a greater impact of meal viscosity on gastric emptying. Previously it has been claimed that when fiber arrives in the distal ileum or in the colon, it exerts a negative feedback on gastric emptying (the 'ileal brake') [33, 34]. Similarly, one could expect that the influence of locust bean gum on gastric emptying would be due to duodenal feedback controlling antroduodenal coordination and inhibiting gastric emptying [35], since rapid intragastric dilution decreases meal viscosity. This might be due to delayed absorption of nutrients (e.g. fats) in the duodenum induced by the presence of fibers in the meal [13].

In our study, the addition of 100 ml water to a nutrient semisolid meal did not influence gastric emptying in healthy subjects. The total caloric content of the basic test meal with added water was the same as the one without water (330 kcal), still the results are surprising. Actually, since the volume and nutrient density of a meal are considered to be important factors for the GER [1] we expected the gastric emptying to be increased after the addition of water to the rice pudding, due to increased volume, and decreased caloric density and viscosity. On the other hand, the water volume added to the test meal might have been to small to provoke a change in gastric emptying rate, despite the considerable decrease in viscosity visible for the eye. Also, in the present study the GER vary widely and more for the test meal with added water than the other test meals (Figure 3). We could not explain this difference. Solid foods empties separately, and more slowly, from the stomach than liquids [17–19], while semisolid foods probably empties in a way more like nutrient liquids. Compared to the study by Thorsdottir [16], our study considered the effect on gastric emptying by adding water into a semisolid meal instead of drinking the water together with a solid meal.

We conclude that the addition of locust bean gum to a nutrient semisolid meal has a major impact on gastric emptying by delaying the emptying rate, but that the addition of water to this test meal has no influence on gastric emptying in healthy subjects. Whether similar results occur in patients with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia remains to be seen since the effects might be different when the gastric motor function is disordered.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Jan-Åke Nilsson for valuable advice on the statistical analysis of our data.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Lund, Malmo University Hospital, Sweden
(2)
Department of Radiology, University of Lund, Malmo University Hospital, Sweden

References

  1. Horowitz M, Dent J, Fraser R, Sun W, Hebbard G: Role and integration of mechanisms controlling gastric emptying. Dig Dis Sci. 1994, 39: 7S-13S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Attvall S, Abrahamsson H, Schvarcz E, Berne C: [Gastric emptying is important for the patients with diabetes]. Läkartidningen. 92 (45): 4166, 4169-4171-2. 1995 Nov 8Google Scholar
  3. Lavigne ME, Wiley ZD, Meyer JH, Martin P, MacGregor IL: Gastric emptying rates of solid food in relation to body size. Gastroenterology. 1978, 74 (6): 1258-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sun WM, Penagini R, Hebbard G, et al: Effect of drink temperature on antropyloroduodenal motility and gastric electrical activity in humans. Gut. 1995, 37 (3): 329-34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Scott AM, Kellow JE, Shuter B, Nolan JM, Hoschl R, Jones MP: Effects of cigarette smoking on solid and liquid intragastric distribution and gastric emptying. Gastroenterology. 1993, 104 (2): 410-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smith U: Dietary fibre, diabetes and obesity. Int J Obes. 1987, 11 (Suppl 1): 27-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins DJ, Jenkins AL: Dietary fiber and the glycemic response. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1985, 180 (3): 422-31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ray TK, Mansell KM, Knight LC, Malmud LS, Owen OE, Boden G: Long-term effects of dietary fiber on glucose tolerance and gastric emptying in noninsulin-dependent diabetic patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983, 37 (3): 376-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackburn NA, Holgate AM, Read NW: Does guar gum improve post-prandial hyperglycaemia in humans by reducing small intestinal contact area?. Br J Nutr. 1984, 52 (2): 197-204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schwartz SE, Levine RA, Weinstock RS, Petokas S, Mills CA, Thomas FD: Sustained pectin ingestion: effect on gastric emptying and glucose tolerance in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988, 48 (6): 1413-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Torsdottir I, Alpsten M, Andersson H, Einarsson S: Dietary guar gum effects on postprandial blood glucose, insulin and hydroxyproline in humans. J Nutr. 1989, 119 (12): 1925-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Leclere CJ, Champ M, Boillot J, et al: Role of viscous guar gums in lowering the glycemic response after a solid meal. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994, 59 (4): 914-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Benini L, Castellani G, Brighenti F, et al: Gastric emptying of a solid meal is accelerated by the removal of dietary fibre naturally present in food. Gut. 1995, 36 (6): 825-30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Blackburn NA, Redfern JS, Jarjis H, et al: The mechanism of action of guar gum in improving glucose tolerance in man. Clin Sci (Lond). 1984, 66 (3): 329-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Flourie B, Vidon N, Florent CH, Bernier JJ: Effect of pectin on jejunal glucose absorption and unstirred layer thickness in normal man. Gut. 1984, 25 (9): 936-41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Torsdottir I, Andersson H: Effect on the postprandial glycaemic level of the addition of water to a meal ingested by healthy subjects and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 1989, 32 (4): 231-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins PJ, Horowitz M, Cook DJ, Harding PE, Shearman DJ: Gastric emptying in normal subjects – a reproducible technique using a single scintillation camera and computer system. Gut. 1983, 24 (12): 1117-25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Camilleri M, Malagelada JR, Brown ML, Becker G, Zinsmeister AR: Relation between antral motility and gastric emptying of solids and liquids in humans. Am J Physiol. 1985, 249 (5 Pt 1): G580-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Houghton LA, Read NW, Heddle R, et al: Relationship of the motor activity of the antrum, pylorus, and duodenum to gastric emptying of a solid-liquid mixed meal. Gastroenterology. 1988, 94 (6): 1285-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Powell DW: Approach to the Patient With Diarrhea. In Textbook of Gastroenterology. Edited by: Yamada T. 1995, JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 813-secondGoogle Scholar
  21. Darwiche G, Almer LO, Bjorgell O, Cederholm C, Nilsson P: Measurement of gastric emptying by standardized real-time ultrasonography in healthy subjects and diabetic patients. J Ultrasound Med. 1999, 18 (10): 673-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Darwiche G, Björgell O, Thorsson O, Almer LO: Correlation between simultaneous scintigraphic and ultrasonographic measurement of gastric emptying in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Ultrasound Med. 2003, 22: 459-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ricci R, Bontempo I, Corazziari E, La Bella A, Torsoli A: Real time ultrasonography of the gastric antrum. Gut. 1993, 34 (2): 173-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldman N, Norenberg C, Voet H, Manor E, Berner Y, Madar Z: Enrichment of an Israeli ethnic food with fibres and their effects on the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Br J Nutr. 1995, 74 (5): 681-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams DR, James WP, Evans IE: Dietary fibre supplementation of a 'normal' breakfast administered to diabetics. Diabetologia. 1980, 18 (5): 379-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rydning A, Berstad A, Berstad T, Hertzenberg L: The effect of guar gum and fiber-enriched wheat bran on gastric emptying of a semisolid meal in healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985, 20 (3): 330-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marciani L, Gowland PA, Spiller RC, et al: Gastric response to increased meal viscosity assessed by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging in humans. J Nutr. 2000, 130 (1): 122-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Quigley EM, Donovan JP, Lane MJ, Gallagher TF: Antroduodenal manometry. Usefulness and limitations as an outpatient study. Dig Dis Sci. 1992, 37 (1): 20-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Heddle R, Dent J, Read NW, et al: Antropyloroduodenal motor responses to intraduodenal lipid infusion in healthy volunteers. Am J Physiol. 1988, 254 (5 Pt 1): G671-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brener W, Hendrix TR, McHugh PR: Regulation of the gastric emptying of glucose. Gastroenterology. 1983, 85 (1): 76-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Buysschaert M, Donckier J, Dive A, Ketelslegers JM, Lambert AE: Gastric acid and pancreatic polypeptide responses to sham feeding are impaired in diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes. 1985, 34 (11): 1181-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hosking DJ, Moody F, Stewart IM, Atkinson M: Vagal impairment of gastric secretion in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Br Med J. 1975, 2 (5971): 588-90. 1975 Jun 14View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin HC, Moller NA, Wolinsky MM, Kim BH, Doty JE, Meyer JH: Sustained slowing effect of lentils on gastric emptying of solids in humans and dogs. Gastroenterology. 1992, 102 (3): 787-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stephen AM, Cummings JH: Mechanism of action of dietary fibre in the human colon. Nature. 284 (5753): 283-4. 1980 Mar 20Google Scholar
  35. Horowitz M, Fraser R: Disordered gastric motor function in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1994, 37 (6): 543-51. 10.1007/s001250050145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    36. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/3/12/prepub

Copyright

© Darwiche et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us