Adenosine preconditioning attenuates hepatic reperfusion injury in the rat by preventing the down-regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Hepatic surgery may be complicated by liver failure. This is usually a result of poor hepatic reserve and reperfusion injury [1]. The latter is partly due to failure of the hepatic microcirculation. Sinusoidal and Kupffer cell swelling following depletion of adenosine 5'-triphosphate during the ischemic period, increased production of the potent vasoconstrictor endothelin and possibly decreased production of nitric oxide (NO), all contribute to narrowing of the sinusoidal lumen [2].

Nitric oxide (NO), a hydrophobic gaseous molecule, is synthesised from L-arginine by different isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Two principal forms of NOS have been described – a constitutive/endothelial form (eNOS) and an inducible form expressed by a number of cells, usually in response to inflammatory mediators. The properties of NO appear to depend on which isoform has contributed to its formation. eNOS, a 135-kDa protein, is dependent on intracellular calcium levels for its activity. It produces a basal level of NO that acts as a vasodilator [3].

Preconditioning refers to a phenomenon in which tissues are rendered resistant to the deleterious effects of ischemia-reperfusion (I-R), either by previous exposure to brief periods of vascular occlusion (ischemic preconditioning) or by the administration of certain chemical agents (pharmacological preconditioning). Of the latter, exogenous adenosine is the most studied and it has been shown to attenuate hepatic reperfusion injury [4–8]. Administration of non-specific inhibitors of NOS reverses this protective effect [4–6]. Adenosine may thus prevent the decrease in NO production believed to occur during early reperfusion. The present study was therefore designed to investigate the effect of exogenous adenosine on eNOS expression during hepatic reperfusion.

The study was performed using male Wistar rats (6 for each group) weighing 250–300 g. All animals (including controls) were anaesthetised by intraperitoneal administration of 2.7 ml/kg of a mixture of one part midazolam + one part Hypnorm ((1 ml of Hypnorm contains 10 mg fluanisone and 0.315 mg fentanyl citrate)) + two parts sterile water. The rats were placed supine on a heating pad to maintain body temperature between 36.5°C and 37.5°C throughout the procedure. The carotid artery was cannulated using an intravenous cannula (Portex, Hythe, UK, 20 G/32 mm) to allow for continuous blood pressure monitoring (Device Mx2, Lectromed UK, Letchworth, UK) and the infusion of normal saline at 0.5 ml/h. All animals underwent laparotomy. The left lateral and median lobes of the liver were mobilised and delivered through the incision after dividing their suspensory ligaments. An avascular plane was developed between the ventral surface of the liver and the portal vein and hepatic artery supplying these lobes. To induce hepatic ischemia, an atraumatic microvascular clip was applied to occlude the portal vein and hepatic artery just distal to the branches supplying the right lateral lobe for 45 min. After 6 h of reperfusion in the I-R groups, and in the control groups a time period equivalent to the duration of ischemia and reperfusion, blood (0.5 ml) was withdrawn from the arterial cannula for the measurement of liver enzymes. The left lateral and median lobes of the liver were harvested and divided for histological paraffin wax examination and immunohistochemical staining. All animal experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with UK Government legislation (Project Licence Number: 70/4393).

To study whether adenosine could modulate NOS expression in hepatic I-R, the following experimental groups were set up:

Group 1 animals subjected to anaesthesia and sham laparotomy only;

Group 2 animals subjected to 45 minutes of partial hepatic ischemia (as described above), followed by 6 h of reperfusion;

Group 3 animals subjected to hepatic ischemia (as described in Group 2), were pre-treated with adenosine (1 mg/kg) dissolved in bicarbonate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) administered via the carotid artery cannula over a 20 minute period. (Animals enrolled in a group not randomised to receive adenosine were given an equivalent volume of buffer solution at the corresponding time period). Hepatic ischemia was induced immediately following the termination of the adenosine infusion.

Group 4 animals treated with adenosine and subjected to hepatic ischemia (as described in Group 3) were also treated with the relative eNOS inhibitor N^G-Nitro-L-arginine (L-NA). This was administered via the carotid cannula at a dose of 10 mg/kg, 3 minutes prior to the administration of adenosine. (Animals in all the other groups received an equivalent volume of buffer solution at the corresponding time period).

The current study has shown that 45 minutes of hepatic ischemia followed by 6 h of reperfusion result in considerable hepatic injury as evidenced by microscopic changes in the liver architecture and release of transaminases. This was associated with a decrease in the normal expression of eNOS within the sinusoidal endothelial cells. This is consistent with previous work suggesting that NO production during the immediate reperfusion period is decreased. Ohmori et al have shown that the administration of NO donors attenuates early hepatic reperfusion injury [9].

In keeping with previous reports from Peralta et al [4, 5], these changes were largely prevented by the administration of systemic adenosine prior to the ischemic period. The experimental model in this study, however, differed slightly from that used by the Barcelona group in two main aspects. The left lateral and median lobes, which account for 70% of the rat's liver mass, were rendered ischemic as opposed to the right hepatic lobe (30% of liver mass). The current model is therefore more similar to the clinical situation where the whole liver is rendered ischemic during total vascular exclusion (which is not tolerated in the rat) for liver resections. Outcome measures (hepatic transaminases and histology) were determined at 6 h from the onset of reperfusion as opposed to 90 minutes, since a number of mechanisms, such as neutrophil activation, which contribute to hepatic injury are operative by 6 h but not by 90 minutes [2].

The findings in this study support previous reports that in models of hepatic I-R the protective effect of adenosine seems to be mediated by NO [4, 5]. NO is not solely a smooth muscle relaxant. In the last decade NO has been shown to act as a potent anti-inflammatory agent, inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory genes [10, 11]. This may partly account for its important role in hepatic I-R. We believe that basal production of NO from endogenously expressed eNOS in the sinusoidal cells of the liver may exert an inhibitory effect on the activation of pro-inflammatory transcription factors. During the no-reflow period, downregulation of eNOS results in subnormal NO concentrations. This may lead to activation of pro-inflammatory genes with the subsequent expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and cellular adhesion molecules, all of which are involved in the pathogenesis of hepatic reperfusion injury.

Using immunohistochemical techniques, the current study has revealed that adenosine prevents the downregulation of eNOS. To evaluate whether this finding is part of the mechanism by which adenosine attenuates hepatic I-R injury, a relative eNOS inhibitor was administered prior to adenosine to verify whether the prevention of eNOS downregulation was implicated in this protective mechanism. Despite normal expression of eNOS, the rise in liver enzymes in those animals administered an eNOS inhibitor prior to adenosine was similar to that of those animals not receiving adenosine preconditioning, supporting the hypothesis that the protective effect of adenosine in hepatic I-R is a result of the prevention of eNOS downregulation. We think that adenosine, by preventing the downregulation of eNOS, may prevent the cascade of events resulting from activation of pro-inflammatory nuclear transcription factors, thereby exerting its protective effect. In keeping with this hypothesis, recent experimental work has shown that adenosine prevents the activation of a potent pro-inflammatory nuclear transcription factor when administered prior to cardiac ischemia-reperfusion [12].

Further work is required to study the mechanisms by which adenosine prevents the downregulation of eNOS. Adenosine is a major component of vascular homeostasis, playing an important role in regulating smooth muscle tone acting via cAMP-mediated cascades to induce vascular smooth muscle relaxation [13]. Evidence is accumulating that eNOS expression is regulated in response to shear stress via poorly understood mechanisms [14]. We therefore infer that by altering blood flow through the sinusoids, adenosine may thus, indirectly alter eNOS expression.

This study has shed more light on a mechanism by which hepatic reperfusion injury may be attenuated. By preventing the downregulation of eNOS within the hepatic sinusoidal cells, adenosine has been shown to act as a potent preconditioning agent.