Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical predictors of incident gallstone disease in a Chinese population in Taipei, Taiwan

BMC Gastroenterology201414:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-14-83

Received: 9 March 2013

Accepted: 23 April 2014

Published: 28 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Gallstone disease (GSD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder throughout the world. The authors explored the incidence of GSD in Taiwan and its condition-associated predictive factors.

Methods

The initial study cohort comprised 2386 healthy adult participants, who were voluntarily admitted to a teaching hospital for a physical check-up in 2002 in Taipei, Taiwan. After excluding 126 patients who exhibited prevalent GSD, 2260 non-GSD participants received annual follow-up screenings for GSD until 31 December, 2007. Of those, 1296 (57.3%) patients were re-examined to collect blood samples and conduct ultrasound sonography.

Results

Among the 1296 participants who exhibited no GSD at the first screening, 23 patients developed GSD during 3640 person-years of follow-up. The incidence was 0.632% per year (95% CI: 0.292%–2.009%). After conducting a Cox regression, increased age (50–59 years versus < 40 years, RR = 2.16 [95% CI: 1.09–5.97], 60+ years versus < 40 years, RR = 3.81 [95% CI: 2.77–8.63]), high body mass index (≥27 kg/m2 versus < 24 kg/m2, RR = 1.64 [95% CI: 1.07–2.98]), high fasting plasma glucose levels (≥126 mg/dL versus < 110 mg/dL, RR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.10–3.87), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (yes versus no, RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.21–1.90) appeared to be significantly related to developing GSD.

Conclusion

Increased age is a well-established risk factor for developing GSD. The current findings indicated that high body mass index, elevated fasting plasma glucose levels, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease were also associated with GSD.

Keywords

Follow-up study Gallstone disease (GSD) Incidence density Predictive factors Screening

Background

Gallstone disease (GSD), a digestive disorder with multifactorial origins, is a common gastrointestinal disorder throughout the world. The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey estimated that 6.3 million men and 14.2 million women ages 20–74 in the United States had GSD [1]. Although GSD yields a low mortality rate, an increased risk of overall mortality in GSD patients is not entirely explained by the high rate of associated cancer deaths; thus, this high morbidity substantially affects the economy and public health [2]. Because of the Westernization of the Taiwanese diet and environment, GSD is no longer rare among its Chinese population and has become a major health problem [3]. In the absence of a suitable screening program for symptomatic GSD, treating GSD and related complications yields substantial healthcare costs.

The availability of ultrasonography as an accurate tool for GSD diagnosis has facilitated evaluating GSD morbidity by conducting epidemiological surveys of the general population [2, 4, 5]. Previous research has explored the prevalence of GSD and its associated factors [3]. Although cross-sectional studies provide useful information regarding disease prevalence, they fail to address the incidence or new cases of GSD among the study population. Thus, the population must be re-examined after a period of time to determine the incidence and causal relations between the risk factors and disease. From a preventive medicine perspective, GSD prevention should focus the relevant risk factors of the disease; thus, exploring the incidence and risk factors of GSD is essential for preventing its development and the cholecystectomy caused complications, which are often insidious. Therefore, a cohort study was indicated for estimating the incidence of GSD; we explored the incidence and risk factors of GSD in Taipei, Taiwan, using a 5-year follow-up period and real-time abdominal ultrasound data.

Methods

Data resource and data collection

Figure 1 shows the procedures for GSD screening between 2002 and 2007. We first established a study cohort to determine the incidence of GSD; the initial study cohort comprised 2386 healthy adults (1235 males and 1151 females) who were voluntarily admitted to a teaching hospital for a physical check-up between January 2002 and December 2002 in Northern Taiwan. Of the 2386 patients, 126 were diagnosed with GSD. The overall prevalence of GSD was 5.3%, comprising single stone 1.7% (n = 40), multiple stone 2.3% (n = 55), and cholecystectomy 1.3% (n = 31) [3]. The details of the study design and execution have been described in full elsewhere [3]. Subsequent annual follow-up screenings for GSD were conducted until 31 December, 2007 for the 2260 patients invited by telephone calls or invitation letters in receive general health examinations and abdominal examinations who lacked GSD in 2002. Participants who were diagnosed as GSD or known cholecystectomy for GSD at the first screening were separately studied [6].
Figure 1

The procedure of screening for gallstone disease among healthy adults during 2002–2007.

We analyzed all patients who participated in at least two GSD screenings, but 964 (42.7%) failed to complete the series of assessments. Those who lost to follow-up during the 5-year period were older (50.9 ± 10.2 years versus 45.1 ± 9.5 years, P < .0001), and exhibited higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels (126.2 ± 20.4 mmHg versus 119.0 ± 16.7 mmHg, P < .0001) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (103.8 ± 23.0 mg/dL versus 95.7 ± 24.6 mg/dL, P < .0001) compared with the participants. All procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the relevant institutional ethics committee, adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki. The participant information was anonymous and taken from the hospital database. This access to personal records was approved to use blood samples and ultrasound sonography results and that these were collected as part of standard care by the human subject review board of Cheng-Hsin General Hospital (CHGH-IRB: (137)97-26) in Taipei, Taiwan.

Blood samples were collected and ultrasound sonography was conducted. Clinical nurses drew fasting blood samples from the study participants by using venipuncture. Overnight-fasting serum and plasma samples (from whole blood preserved using EDTA and NaF) were maintained frozen at −20°C until analysis. We defined type-2 diabetes (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL) based on the 1997 ADA criteria [7], using the following conditions: obesity as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m [2], high SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, high diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, hypercholesterolemia (≥200 mg/dL), hypertriglyceridemia (≥200 mg/dL), low HDL (<35 mg/dL), high blood urea nitrogen (BUN; ≥ 20 mg/dL), high creatinine (≥1.4 mg/dL), and hyperuricemia (≥7 mg/dL for males or ≥ 6 mg/dL for females). Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) levels of ≥ 40 U/L were classified as elevated [8]. In addition, the related demographic information, dietary habits, and other personal and family chronic diseases history were collected at one-to-one well-trained interviews using a structured questionnaire.

Diagnosis of gallstone disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

After at least 8 hours of fasting, a panel of specialists examined the abdominal region of each patient, diagnosing GSD based on real-time ultrasound sonography (TOSHIBA nemio SSA-550A, Japan) and the presence of “movable hyper-echoic foci with acoustic shadows.” Cases of GSD were classified as follows: single gallbladder stone, multiple gallbladder stones, and cholecystectomy, excluding gallbladder polyps. The cases were identified as any type of GSD that developed among the study population [3].

The ultrasonographic criteria which were used to diagnose a fatty liver included liver and kidney echo discrepancy, presence of an increased liver echogenicity, echo penetration into the deep portion of the liver, and clarity of the liver blood vessel structures [9]. All study subjects who were diagnosed as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by ultrasound and without disease history of Wilson’s disease, intestinal bypass surgery, or gulten enteropathy, ingestion of of drugs known to produce hepaticsteatosis including methotrexate, tamoxifen, amiodarone, and nucleoside analogues, positive serology for hepatitis B or C virus, a history of another known liver disease, and alcohol consumption (alcohol intake of 30 g/day or more for males and 20 g/day or more for females) were enrolled the study [10].

Interobserver reliability in ultrasound sonography

To establish a consistent GSD diagnoses among the specialists, we used the Kappa statistic to assess the agreement of interobserver reliability. We conducted a pilot study, randomly selecting 100 non-study participants. Regarding interobserver reliability, the Kappa value for GSD diagnosis among specialists was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61–0.95) [3]. In addition, the Kappa value for diagnosis of NAFLD between specialists was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.88).

Statistical analysis

We performed statistical analyses using SAS for Windows, (SAS version 9.0; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), determining the GSD incidence per year based on the ratio of the observed number of cases to the total number of patient-years at risk. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for incidence by using a Poisson distribution. Concerning the univariate analysis, a t-test and chi-square test were used to evaluate the continuous and categorical variables; a multiple Cox regression was conducted to investigate the independence of factors associated with developing GSD. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results are presented as mean ± SD.

Results

Of the 2260 participants in the study cohort, 1296 attended at least 2 sonographic check-ups: 710 (54.8%) attended 2 consultations, 402 (31.0%) attended 3 consultations, and 184 (14.2%) attended 4 or more consultations during the 5-year period. The overall response rate was approximately 57.3, and the mean follow-up time was 3.51 ± 0.84 years. The patients were considered censored cases if their outcomes were unavailable. Twenty participants were found to have GSD (9 single stone and 11 multiple stones) and three had received cholecystectomy for GSD during the 5-year follow-up period. Table 1 shows that the females attained higher attendance rates than the males did (62.3% versus 52.8%) and young people (<40 and 40–49 years) exhibited a slightly lower attendance rate compared with other age groups.
Table 1

The attendance rate of gallstone disease screening from 2002 to 2007 (n = 1296)

Variable

Eligible population

Screened population

Attendance rate

 

n

n

(%)

Sex

   

Male

1176

621

52.8

Female

1084

675

62.3

Age

   

<40

734

373

50.8

40-49

704

409

58.1

50-59

464

285

61.4

60+

358

229

64.0

Total

2260

1296

57.3

Table 2 lists the gender- and age-specific incidences of GSD. The overall incidence of GSD was 0.632% per year (95% CI: 0.292%–2.009%), indicating a clear trend based on age (p = 0.03), where values monotonically increase. The values increased from 0.214% per year (95% CI: 0.062%–1.719%) at ages <40 to 0.470% per year (95% CI: 0.112%–2.103) at ages 40–49, 0.585% per year (95% CI: 0.236%–1.983%) at ages 50–59, and 1.394% per year (95% CI: 0.410–2.477%) at ages greater than 60. The age groups exhibited no consistent patterns. Females demonstrated a slightly higher incidence (0.741% versus 0.496% per year, P = 0.40) compared with males, but the gender difference was non-significant.
Table 2

Sex- and age-specific incidence of gallstone disease among screened patients (n = 1296)

Incidence of any gallstone disease

Variable

No. of no GSD at first screening

New cases

Person years at risk

Incidence Density (% per year) (95% CI)

Gender

    

Male

621

8

1614.5

0.496 (0.181-1.973)

Female

675

15

2025.5

0.741 (0.254-2.116)

p-value

   

0.40

Age

    

<40

373

2

932.5

0.214 (0.062-1.719)

40-49

409

5

1063.5

0.470 (0.112-2.103)

50-59

285

5

855

0.585 (0.236-1.983)

60+

229

11

789

1.394 (0.410-2.477)

p-value

   

0.03

Total

1296

23

3640

0.632 (0.292-2.009)

Table 3 shows the risk factors for developing GSD based on the univariate analysis. The significant risk factors of GSD were age (P < .0001), FPG (P < .0001), SBP (P < .0001), BMI (P < .0001), ALT (P = .001), and NAFLD (P = .04). In addition, to assess how these factors independently contributed to GSD, the significant variables from the univariate analysis were examined using a Cox regression, evaluating age, FPG, SBP, BMI, ALT, and NAFLD. As Table 4 shows, subsequent to adjustment for confounders, the following factors appeared to be significantly related to GSD incidence: age (50–59 years versus < 40 years, RR = 2.16 [95% CI: 1.09–5.97], 60+ years versus < 40 years, RR = 3.81 [95% CI: 2.77–8.63]), elevated BMI (≥27 kg/m2 versus < 24 kg/m2, RR = 1.64 [95% CI: 1.07–2.98]), elevated FPG (≥126 mg/ dL versus <110 mg/dL, RR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.10–3.87), and NAFLD(yes versus no, RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.21–1.90).
Table 3

Univariate analysis of risk factors for the development of gallstone disease among screened patients (n = 1296)

 

Development of gallstone disease

Variables

Yes (n = 23)

No (n = 1273)

P value for t test or chi-square test

Definitions of disease condition

 

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

  

Continuous variables

    

Age (years)

60.55 ± 14.28

51.32 ± 13.01

<0.0001

----

Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)

113.78 ± 20.69

100.55 ± 30.06

<0.0001

≥126 mg/dL

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

132.90 ± 19.77

123.08 ± 18.69

<0.0001

≥140 mmHg

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

80.77 ± 11.90

79.23 ± 12.07

NS

≥90 mmHg

Body mass index (Kg/m2)

24.86 ± 3.48

23.39 ± 3.37

<0.0001

≥27Kg/m2

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

218.17 ± 35.68

209.80 ± 36.75

NS

≥200 mg/dL

Triglyceride (mg/dL)

150.68 ± 88.04

147.26 ± 79.53

NS

≥200 mg/dL

HDL (mg/dL)

55.70 ± 16.31

54.24 ± 15.92

NS

<35 mg/dL

BUN (mg/dL)

14.82 ± 6.19

14.57 ± 5.80

NS

≥20 mg/dL

Creatinine (mg/dL)

1.07 ± 0.33

1.05 ± 0.28

NS

≥1.4 mg/dL

AST (U/L)

30.78 ± 19.61

27.08 ± 18.55

NS

≥40U/L

ALT (U/L)

34.42 ± 22.06

28.19 ± 21.50

0.001

≥40U/L

Uric acid (mg/dL)

6.05 ± 1.01

5.99 ± 1.12

NS

≥7 mg/dL for males or ≥6 mg/dL for females

Categorical variables

    

NAFLD

yes

17 (73.9%)

672 (52.8%)

0.04

----

 

no

6 (26.1%)

601 (47.2%)

 

----

Heavy fatty or fried foods

yes

5 (21.7%)

251 (19.7%)

NS

----

 

no

18 (78.3%)

1022 (80.3%)

 

----

Table 4

Cox regression model of risk factors associated with the development of gallstone disease among screened patients (n = 1296)

 

Development of gallstone disease (yes versus no)

Variables

Relative risk

(95% CI)

Gender (female versus male)

2.12

0.45-4.16

Age (40–49 versus <40 years)

1.65

0.41-3.79

(50–59 versus <40 years)

2.16

1.09-5.97

(60+ versus <40 years)

3.81

2.77-8.63

BMI (24–27 versus <24 Kg/m2)

1.13

0.56-3.28

(≥27 versus <24 Kg/m2)

1.64

1.07-2.98

FPG (110–125 versus <110 mg/dL)

1.22

0.49-2.31

(≥126 versus <110 mg/dL)

1.68

1.10-3.87

Higher SBP (yes versus no)

1.11

0.53-2.18

Higher ALT (yes versus no)

1.03

0.68-2.87

NAFLD (yes versus no)

1.44

1.21-1.90

Discussion

Incidence and risk factors for the development of gallstone disease

Knowledge of GSD epidemiology is crucial to managing this disorder when planning preventive programs and identifying the optimal therapeutic strategies [2]. Previous clinical studies have yielded reliable positive (0.99–1.00) and negative (0.90–0.96) predictive values regarding the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography [11], suggesting that abdominal ultrasound is a robust method for GSD screening. The availability of ultrasonography as an accurate tool for GSD diagnosis has facilitated evaluating GSD morbidity by conducting epidemiological surveys of study populations in Eastern and Western countries [2, 3, 12, 13]. Few studies have explored the incidence and possible etiology of GSD among the general population of Taiwan.

The incidence of GSD appears to vary among test populations and differs among studies conducted in disparate countries [2, 12, 13]. It is of interest that the prevalence and the incidence differ very little from two Italian studies, 10 years apart - GREPCO (1998) and MICOL (2008) [2, 13]. This may suggest that the diet of the Chinese in Taiwan is already Westernised. In addition to varying methods of assessing GSD, this disparity might be caused by differences among genetic populations. In this study, the annual incidence of overall GSD was slightly lower compared with that of other evidence-based studies [2, 13]; this difference may be a result of the Kappa value for the agreement of interobserver reliability. Although the value appeared appropriate [14], non-differential misclassification-bias identification could have occurred, generating an underestimated GSD incidence.

In this study, the proportion of the population lost to follow up was in the higher risk categories for GSD. This deficiency is likely to have under recorded the overall incidence. In addition, the response rate was lower than that reported in other follow-up studies for GSD [2, 12, 13] and the older population had a higher attendance rate could be related a potential self-selection bias. The characteristics of the elderly subjects which may cause them to select themselves in the screening program create abnormal or undesirable conditions in the group.

The estimated incidence of GSD in this study was higher in females compared with males, and increased as age increased. This finding is consistent with the reports of other studies conducted elsewhere [2, 13]. GSD is rare in neonates and young children [5]; thus, long-term exposure to risk factors may explain the increased probability of developing GSD in old age. The morbidity of GSD increases as age increases, noticeably elevating after age 40 and becoming 4- to 10-fold more likely [15]. Although GSD patients are often clinically silent, the symptoms of GSD and number of severe complications increase as age increases, leading to cholecystectomy in more than 40% of patients older than 40 [5, 16]. In addition, gender is a substantial factor in GSD and females are almost twice as likely as males to develop stones [15]. Female sex hormones adversely influence hepatic bile secretion and gallbladder function and estrogens increase cholesterol secretion and diminish bile salt secretion [5]. Thus, females do not have a significantly higher incidence of all types of GSD compared with males. Another possible reason was that a Type II error due to small incident numbers, since the relative risk is 2.12 in this study. Previous research has shown that cholesterol GSD is common among Western populations, whereas pigment GSD is common in Taiwan [17]. The differing findings among Eastern and Western populations suggests that cholesterol GSD is not yet a major problem among Chinese populations.

The findings indicated that FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL was highly associated with GSD incidence; that is, type 2 diabetes might be a positive risk factor for GSD. The association between diabetes mellitus and GSD is confounded by age, obesity, and family history of GSD [15]. The possible pathogenic reasons for this are that type 2 diabetes combined with GSD might induce acute cholecystitis more often and yield a higher probability of progression to septicemia compared with non-diabetic patients, who exhibit normally functioning gallbladders. Late-onset diabetes patients may demonstrate a higher lithogenic bile index compared with non-diabetics after adjusting for sex and age [18]. The association between diabetes and GSD is stronger among patients who have a history of treated diabetes mellitus than it is among those with a simple history of diabetes; this could indicate that hyperglycemia affects gallbladder motility [3]. In addition, the links among diabetes, obesity, and GSD most likely originate from metabolic syndrome [15, 19].

After using univariate and multiple Cox regression analyses, the findings indicate that obesity is a significant risk factor for GSD. This agreed with the results of other studies that employed extended screening intervals [2, 12, 13]. The validity of BMI as a measure of adiposity has been assessed by comparison with densitometry [12]. From a biological viewpoint, BMI is primarily a surrogate of lean body mass when BMI and height-adjusted waist circumference are included in the same model, because the variation in BMI attributable to adiposity is essentially controlled by the height-adjusted waist circumference variable [12, 18]. However, additional epidemiological and etiologic investigations must explore the pathophysiological mechanisms among BMI, waist circumference, and GSD among Chinese populations.

Cirrhosis is a predictive risk factor for GSD, particularly in the advanced stages of the disease [20, 21]. The annual incidence of GSD among cirrhosis patients is approximately 8 times higher than is that among the general population [20]. ALT has, for some time, been viewed as a sensitive indicator of liver-cell injury [22]. Determining serum ALT levels is the most frequent test used to identify liver disease. This parameter also acts as a surrogate marker for disease severity and an index of hepatic activity [18]. In addition to type 2 diabetes, the findings show that elevated ALT levels may indicate an increased risk of GSD, implying that appropriately integrated diagnosis and therapy in the early stages of liver dysfunction might facilitate preventing GSD. Additional studies should be conducted to explore whether elevated ALT levels are an indicator of GSD, rather than a sign of serious liver diseases, such as cirrhosis, because they can indicate a fatty liver (and thus a high BMI) and the early stages of chronic liver disease [18].

NAFLD includes a wide spectrum of liver diseases, ranging from simple fatty liver, simple steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and liver cirrhosis, which may eventually progress to liver damage, liver fibrosis, portal hypertension, and hepatocellular carcinoma [23]. In mainland China and Taiwan, NAFLD is now viewed as one of major causes of asymptomatic elevation of liver enzymes [24, 25]. Our results indicated that NAFLD was associated with incident GSD after adjustment for confounding factors.The association between NAFLD and GSD is based upon associated risk factors and metabolic derangements that are common to both conditions. From the preventive medicine viewpoint, modifiable risk factors for GSD and NAFLD include obesity and metabolic syndrome, both of which can be addressed with weight loss, exercise and dietary modifications such as a low-fat, low-sugar diet [26].

Methodological considerations

Although we used a follow-up study design to clarify the temporal characteristics of the potential risk factors of GSD, certain limitations apply to this study. First, a major limitation was the potential self-selection bias caused by the hospital-based study design and those aged 60 or over were only 18% of the sample and yet developed 48% of the GSD; that is, the sample may not be representative of the general population. Second, the risk characteristics pertinent to the study participants significantly differed from those of non-respondents, indicating that the patients who did not complete the follow-up might have severe GSD. We assumed that all new GSD cases occurred during screening year; however, because additional GSD cases could occur at any time during the screening period, the incidence of GSD could be underestimated. Third, we did estimate the incidence of GSD formation, but rather investigated the incidence of newly screened GSD, focusing only on clinically relevant GSD. Fourth, we did not distinguish between cholesterol and pigment stones, potentially yielding measurement errors and distinct pathogenicity. Fifth, the incidence of GSD was higher (although non-significant) in female, however, there are no data regarding the number of pregnancies and the frequency of pill in this study. Finally, we further explored the 964 out of 2260 subjects who were lost to follow-up using telephone interview: 29 cases deceased, 106 cases moved out of the study township, 281 cases were refusals, 12 cases had presence of GSD or history of cholecystectomy. This might imply that the sample size was insufficient to estimate how potential risk factors affect the incidence of GSD. Further long-term research should be conducted to explore the morbidity of GSD and plausible biological mechanisms underlying its development.

Conclusion

Increased age is a well-established risk factor for the development of GSD. The current findings indicate that high BMI, elevated FPG and NAFLD levels are also associated with GSD.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grants from the National Science Council (NSC-98-2314-B-002-MY3) and Cheng-Hsin General Hospital (97–26).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine, Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang-Gung University
(2)
Cheng Hsin General Hospital
(3)
Cheng Hsin General Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University
(4)
Cheng Hsin General Hospital; Faculty of Public Health, School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University

References

  1. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR: Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterol. 1999, 117: 632-10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70456-7. PMID: 10464139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Festi D, Dormi A, Capodicasa S, Staniscia T, Attili AF, Loria P, Pazzi P, Mazzella G, Sama C, Roda E, Colecchia A: Incidence of gallstone disease in Italy: results from a multicenter, population-based Italian study (the MICOL project). World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14: 5282-5289. 10.3748/wjg.14.5282. PMID: 18785280View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu CM, Tung TH, Chou P, Chen VT, Hsu CT, Chien WS, Lin YT, Lu HF, Shih HC, Liu JH: Clinical correlation of gallstone disease in a Chinese population in Taiwan: experience at Cheng Hsin General Hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12: 1281-1286. PMID: 16534886View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaffer EA: Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005, 7: 132-140. 10.1007/s11894-005-0051-8. PMID: 15802102View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA: Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010, 39: 157-169. 10.1016/j.gtc.2010.02.003. vii [PMID: 20478480]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hsu CT, Lien SY, Jiang YD, Liu JH, Shih HC, Tung TH: Screening gallstone disease by ultrasound decreases the necessity of cholecystectomy. Asia Life Sci. 2013, 22: 51-60.Google Scholar
  7. American Diabetes Association: American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 1999. Diabetes Care. 1999, 22: S1-S114. 10.2337/diacare.22.1.1. PMID: 10333970View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang CS, Wang ST, Chang TT, Yao WJ, Chou P: Smoking and alanine aminotransferase levels in hepatitis C virus infection: Implications for prevention of hepatitis C virus progression. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162: 811-815. 10.1001/archinte.162.7.811. PMID: 11926856View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai HF, Shen Z, Yu CH, Zhang XC, Li YM: Epidemiology of fatty liver in an islander population of China: a population-based case–control study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2008, 7: 373-378. PMID: 18693172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin YC, Chou SC, Huang PT, Chiou HY: Risk factors and predictors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Taiwan. Ann Hepatol. 2011, 10: 125-132. PMID: 21502673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mogensen NB, Madsen M, Stage P, Mazten P, Malchow-Moller A, Lejerstofte J, Uhrenholdt A: Ultrasonography versus roentenography in suspected instances of cholelithiasis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984, 159: 353-356. PMID: 6385312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsai CJ, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL: Prospective study of abdominal adiposity and gallstone disease in US men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 80: 38-44. [PMID: 15213025]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Angelico F, Del Ben M, Barbato A, Conti R, Urbinati G: Ten-year incidence and natural history of gallstone disease in a rural population of women in central Italy. The Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997, 29: 249-254. PMID: 9646217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrt T: How good is that agreement?. Epidemiology. 1996, 7: 561-PMID: 8862998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shaffer EA: Gallstone disease: epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006, 20: 981-996. 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004. PMID: 17127183View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Völzke H, Baumeister SE, Alte D, Hoffmann W, Schwahn C, Simon P, John U, Lerch MM: Independent risk factors for gallstone formation in a region with high cholelithiasis prevalence. Digestion. 2005, 71: 97-105. 10.1159/000084525. [PMID: 15775677]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen CY, Lu CL, Huang YS, Tam TN, Chan Y, Chang FY, Lee SD: Age is one of the risk factors in developing gallstone disease in Taiwan. Age Ageing. 1998, 27: 437-441. 10.1093/ageing/27.4.437. PMID: 9883999View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tung TH, Ho HM, Shih HC, Chou P, Liu JH, Chen VT, Chan DC, Liu CM: A population-based follow-up study on gallstone disease among type 2 diabetics in Kinmen, Taiwan. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12: 4536-4540. PMID: 16874867View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu CM, Tung TH, Liu JH, Tsai YK, Chen VTK, Tam TN, Lu HF, Wang KK, Hsu CT, Chou P: Serum insulin, insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, and gallstone disease among type 2 diabetics in Chinese population: A community-based study in Kinmen, Taiwan. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11: 7159-7164. PMID: 16437664View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Forari F, Imberti D, Squillante MM, Squassante L, Civardi G, Buscarini E, Cavanna L, Caturelli E, Buscarini L: Incidence of gallstones in a population of patients with cirrhosis. J Hepat. 1994, 20: 797-801. 10.1016/S0168-8278(05)80152-7. PMID: 7930481View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Olmo JAD, Garcia F, Serra MA, Maldonado L, Rodrigo JM: Prevalence and incidence of gallstones in liver cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997, 32: 1061-1065. 10.3109/00365529709011225. PMID: 9361181View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan MM: Alanine aminotransferase levels: what's normal?. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 137: 49-51. 10.7326/0003-4819-137-1-200207020-00012. PMID: 12093245View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn W, Xu R, Wingard DL, Rogers C, Angulo P, Younossi ZM, Schwimmer JB: Suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality risk in a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008, 103: 2263-2271. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02034.x. [PMID: 18684196]View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan JG, Li F, Cai XB, Peng YD, Ao QH, Gao Y: The important of metabolic factors for the increasing prevalence of fatty liver in Shanghai factory workers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 22: 663-668. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04892.x. [PMID: 17444853]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen CH, Huang MH, Yang JC, Nien CK, Yang CC, Yeh YH, Yueh SK: Prevalence and etiology of elevated serum alanine aminotransferase level in an adult population in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 22: 1482-1489. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04615.x. PMID: 17716352View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yener O, Aksoy F, Demır M, Özçelık A, Erengül C: Gallstones associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and metabolic syndrome. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2010, 21: 411-415. [PMID: 21331995]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/14/83/prepub

Copyright

© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.