Skip to main content

Evaluation of yellow pea fibre supplementation on weight loss and the gut microbiota: a randomized controlled trial



Fibre intake among North Americans is currently less than half the recommended amount. Consumers are interested in food products that could promote weight loss and improve health. Consequently, evaluation of unique fibre sources with potential gut-mediated benefits for metabolic health warrants investigation. Our objective is to assess the effects of yellow pea fibre supplementation on weight loss and gut microbiota in an overweight and obese adult population.


In a double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study, overweight and obese (BMI = 25-38) adults will be randomized to either a 15 g/d yellow pea fibre supplemented group or isocaloric placebo group for 12 weeks (n = 30/group). The primary outcome measure is a change in body fat from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include glucose tolerance, appetite regulation, serum lipids and inflammatory markers. Anthropometric data (height, weight, BMI, and waist circumference) and food intake (by 3-day weighed food records) will be measured at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter. Subjective ratings of appetite will be recorded by participants at home on a weekly basis using validated visual analogue scales. At week 0 and at the end of the study (week 12), an ad libitum lunch buffet protocol for objective food intake measures and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan for body composition will be completed. Participants will be instructed not to change their exercise habits during the 12 week study. Glucose and insulin will be measured during an oral glucose tolerance test at weeks 0 and 12. Levels of lipids and CRP will be measured and inflammatory markers (adiponectin, leptin, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8) in the serum will be quantified using Milliplex kits. Mechanisms related to changes in gut microbiota, serum and fecal water metabolomics will be assessed.


Globally the development of functional foods and functional food ingredients are critically needed to curb the rise in metabolic disease. This project will assess the potential of yellow pea fibre to improve weight control via gut-mediated changes in metabolic health in overweight and obese adults.

Trial registration (NCT01719900) Registered October 23, 2012.

Peer Review reports


The impact of obesity is increasingly felt on a global scale and includes the precipitous rise in co-morbidities such as type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidemia. In 2008 the cost associated with obesity and relevant chronic diseases was estimated to be between $4.6 and $7.1 billion in Canada, depending on the number of chronic diseases included in the estimation [1]. Of these costs, a large proportion is due to prescription drugs for management of obesity-related risk factors. For example, in 2004, pharmaceutical costs in Canada for lipid-lowering drugs alone (i.e. one singular risk factor for cardiovascular disease) was $1.39 billion [2]. In the United States, cardiometabolic risk factor clusters (including BMI > 25 and two of diabetes, hyperlipidemia or hypertension) were responsible for national medical expenditures of $80 billion, of which $27 billion went to prescription drugs [3]. Therefore, there is a distinct need for solutions for the prevention and management of obesity and its related conditions. As opposed to pharmaceuticals, targeted lifestyle interventions, particularly diet, are the safest and most economic approaches for the prevention and treatment of obesity-related conditions on a population level, and have the capacity to achieve multi-faceted health benefits.

Obesity is intimately linked to increased food intake with both quantitative and qualitative implications. In particular, fibre is a critical aspect of the diet because of its beneficial effects on numerous risk factors, including reducing plasma lipid levels, improving glucose metabolism, and enhancing satiety which helps to reduce food intake [4]. Current Institute of Medicine recommendations for dietary fibre intake are 38 g/d for adult males and 25 g/d for adult females [5]. Unfortunately, data from national nutrition surveys indicate that dietary fibre intake is currently significantly below the recommended intake level [6]. Therefore, interventions directed at increasing fibre consumption from a variety of sources are needed. Dietary fibre may also produce unique changes in gut microbiota, which independently may improve glucose tolerance, satiety, and lipid metabolism [7]. Different types of fibre and/or fibre sources may affect metabolic health in distinct ways, and therefore the diversity of fibre sources in the food supply is important [8].

Effect of fibre on weight control and glucose tolerance

A great deal of focus has been directed towards elucidating and evaluating the beneficial metabolic effects of fibre intake on gut as well as whole-body health in humans [9, 10]. The primary proposed mechanisms for how dietary fibre (specifically soluble and fermentable fibre) contributes to improved weight control and insulin sensitivity include delayed nutrient absorption, stimulation of gut hormones that regulate food intake and modulation of gut bacteria.

A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that increased fibre intake, whether from diets containing foods rich in fibre or soluble fibre supplements, was associated with reduced HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes [11]. The improvement in glycemic responses following a high-fibre meal has also been shown to carry through after a subsequent meal, the so-called “second meal effect” [12]. Part of the beneficial effect of dietary fibre on postprandial glucose control may be related to the release of gut peptides that influence insulin responses and food intake, such as glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY) and ghrelin. For example, feeding the prebiotic fibre oligofructose for 12 weeks reduced levels of the orexigenic hormone ghrelin and increased levels of the anorexigenic hormone PYY in overweight adults which corresponded with lower self-reported energy intake [13]. In the long-term, these changes in postprandial peptide secretion may promote weight loss through reductions in ad libitum food intake.

Role of gut microbiota in obesity and insulin resistance

Members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla represent the majority of species in the human gut, while Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chlamydiae, Spirochetes, and Fusobacteria are present in markedly lower abundance [14]. The gut microbiota phenotype can be both genetically and environmentally determined. There is some degree of genetic influence, because relatives show greater similarities in phylotypes than unrelated individuals even when these family members live in different environments [15]. However, investigations have largely been targeted towards determining how microbiota can be environmentally influenced, specifically by disease state and lifestyle interventions. For example, obese individuals have been observed to have greater proportions of Firmicutes and lesser Bacteroidetes [15, 16]. A lower proportion of Bacteroidetes has also been observed as glucose tolerance worsens [17] and during progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [18].

Both bacterial abundance and composition can be altered with lifestyle changes. Indeed, part of the role of intestinal bacteria in weight control has been elucidated through study of patients receiving bariatric surgery. Kong et al. [19] profiled the gut microbiota of 30 morbidly obese women before and after receiving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery [19]. After the surgery, Bacteroidetes was increased and Firmicutes and bifidobacteria populations were reduced. Further, the “richness” (referring to the number of species present) was greater after surgery, and the gut microbiota composition correlated more strongly with white-adipose tissue gene expression compared to pre-surgery [19]. Weight loss produced via dietary restriction results in an increase in the relative proportion of Bacteroidetes and a reduction in Firmicutes, such that the microbiota profile becomes more similar to lean healthy control subjects [16]. Feeding specific dietary fibres can also beneficially modulate gut bacteria populations. For example, in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in obese women, feeding 16 g/d inulin and oligofructose (50/50) vs. placebo (maltodextrin) for 3 months decreased Bacteroides, which was associated with a slight reduction in fat mass [20]. In this study, 1H-NMR was also performed, but there was no clear clustering effect of treatment that could be detected for gut microbial analysis or plasma/urine metabolomic profiles. Indeed, the specific metabolic function of different bacterial species is still being elucidated. However, metagenomic mapping of gut bacteria indicates a highly enriched and functionally diverse genome related to numerous pathways including metabolism of carbohydrates, energy, amino acids, and vitamins [21].

Part of the beneficial metabolic impact of gut bacteria has been attributed to the byproducts produced during fermentation of nondigestible carbohydrates (i.e. dietary fibre) by these organisms. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are the primary end-products of carbohydrate fermentation by gut bacteria, and include acetate, propionate, and butyrate [22, 23]. SCFA are a major energy source for colonocytes [22]. Recently, it has been discovered that SCFA are natural ligands for the G-protein coupled receptor GPR43, which is expressed in numerous tissues including immune cells, adipocytes, and endocrine cells [23, 24]. While the metabolic implications of SCFA are still being elucidated, emerging data suggests that the binding of SCFA to GPR43 may improve glucose tolerance and fat metabolism. For example, in primary culture the binding of SCFA to intestinal GPR43 stimulates GLP-1 secretion by colonic L cells [25]. In animals, mice overexpressing GPR43 in adipose tissue remain lean on a high-fat diet and exhibit lower body weight, white adipose weight, and smaller adipocyte size [26]. In contrast to wild-type mice, these animals did not develop hepatic steatosis in response to a high-fat diet and had normal glucose tolerance. Finally, the GPR43 mice also displayed greater energy expenditure and increased fat oxidation [26]. While these findings are preliminary, the implication is that SCFA may have important effects on the host organism beyond energy production in the gut.

Pea fibre as a novel and sustainable fibre source

Recently, the interest in pulse crops (e.g. dried beans and peas) as sources of dietary fibre has increased [27]. Yellow peas are a native Albertan pulse crop [28] with the potential to have beneficial effects on plasma lipids, glucose metabolism, and weight control. Pea hulls are comprised of ~82% fibre making them an excellent source of dietary fibre that could be incorporated into food products [29].

To date, few studies have examined the metabolic effects of pea fibre in animal models. Briefly, in rats with diet-induced glucose intolerance, feeding dry pea seed coats improved glucose tolerance as well as fasting and glucose-stimulated insulin levels [30]. Investigation of skeletal muscle expression of proteins involved in insulin signaling suggested that pea seed coat consumption increased glucose transport. Finally, pea seed coat consumption also appeared to reduce markers of oxidative stress [30]. In hypercholesterolemic Golden Syrian hamsters, feeding whole pea flour or fractionated pea flour (hulls only) did not reduce plasma lipid levels, but decreased fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, and showed a statistical trend towards reducing body fat [31]. More recently, we have demonstrated that yellow pea fibre reduces glycemia in diet-induced obese rats while yellow pea flour (rich in pea protein) reduces adiposity (Eslinger et al., Submitted). Both pea fibre and pea flour reduced the percent of fecal Firmicutes.

The state of the literature regarding metabolic effects of pea hull fibre specifically in humans is limited to few studies. In an acute meal setting, adding pea fibre (10 g) to a low-fibre (2.8 g) test meal resulted in lower postprandial plasma cholesterol levels compared to soybean fibre in normolipidemic men, but postprandial glucose, insulin, and plasma triglyceride were not affected by fibre type [32]. Similarly, isoenergetic high-fibre (26 g) and low-fibre (9 g) meals produced similar postprandial glucose and insulin in healthy normal men, however plasma free fatty acids were better suppressed after the high-fibre meal which contained pea fibre baked into wheat bread [33]. Conversely, in one study of healthy adults, pea fibre (15 g) incorporated into a mixed test meal significantly reduced the postprandial glucose incremental area under the curve as compared to sugar beet fibre and wheat bran, while addition of all fibres reduced the postprandial insulin response [34].

As opposed to the effects of acute ingestion of pea fibre, the metabolic effects of consuming diets containing foods fortified with pea fibre are also limited to a few studies. In one study, addition of pea hull fibre to existing foods (resulting in an average of 3 g/d pea fibre) increased stool frequency in elderly residents of a long-term care facility, representing a safe, economical, and non-invasive alternative to relieve constipation in the elderly [35]. Feeding young healthy adults a low-fibre diet or a low-fibre diet supplemented with 33 g/d pea fibre product (corresponding to 20 g dietary fibre) in a randomized cross-over study showed no differences in fasting cholesterol levels however triglyceride levels in the plasma and those arising from the liver were reduced in the pea fibre supplemented group [36]. In addition, incorporation of the fibre into breakfast and lunch meals resulted in significantly lower plasma and chylomicron triglyceride responses, as well as plasma insulin concentrations. Incorporation of whole yellow pea flour into baked products reduced postprandial glycemia in healthy men and women compared to products containing whole wheat flour [37]. Finally, in a population who could potentially benefit the most from dietary fibre provision, providing baked products containing pea fibre (12 g/d of fibre) to overweight hypercholesterolemic adults for 28d reduced fasting insulin concentrations and improved postprandial glucose responses after a standardized breakfast meal [38]. Given the limited state of evidence for the potential benefits of pea fibre in individuals at-risk for obesity and metabolic syndrome, clinical trials specifically examining the clinical outcomes and mechanisms related to pea fibre consumption are warranted.

Specific objectives

This project proposes to perform a comprehensive investigation of the effects of pea fibre supplementation on 1) weight loss, 2) glucose control and features of the metabolic syndrome, 3) food intake and satiety, and 4) gut microbiota and serum and fecal water metabolites in free-living overweight and obese adults. The combination of anthropometric measurements with plasma metabolomics and analysis of fecal microbiota will provide unique information on the whole-body and in vivo effects of pea fibre consumption in overweight adults.

Given the research aims, the primary outcome is change in body fat mass from baseline to 12 weeks. Our secondary outcomes include glucose tolerance, serum lipids and inflammatory markers, and objective and subjective measures of food intake and appetite. To better understand the mechanisms by which yellow pea fibre may impact metabolism, we will also undertake exploratory mechanistic studies on changes in intestinal microbiota and in vivo metabolism assessed using metabolomics analysis.

It is first hypothesized that the group consuming the pea fibre will have a greater reduction in body fat compared to the control group. Second, it is predicted that at follow-up the pea fibre group will have lower fasting insulin concentrations and reduced glucose and insulin excursions during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Third, it is expected that the pea fibre group will have greater ratings of fullness and a reduction in ad libitum energy intake compared to control. Finally, it is anticipated that supplementation of pea fibre will beneficially alter gut microbiota and induce a unique serum and fecal water metabolite signature reflective of the changes in body fat mass.


Design, participants, and setting

This study will utilize a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design in which 60 overweight and obese adults (age 18-70 y; BMI 25-38 kg/m2) will be randomized to either a placebo (n = 30) or pea fibre supplemented (n = 30; 15 g/d yellow pea fibre) group for 12 weeks. Randomization will be carried out using computer generated numbers and stratified according to age, sex, and BMI.

Adults with a stable body weight for at least 3 months prior to the study, defined as weight loss or gain of <3 kg within preceding 3 months to enrollment, will be eligible to participate. Exclusion criteria include: concomitant use of any weight loss medication (e.g. Orlistat) or diet/exercise regime designed for weight loss; use of corticosteroids, anti-depressants, or anti-epileptic, lipid-lowering, and diabetes medications; previous bariatric or other intestinal surgery; pregnancy or lactation; use of bulk laxatives or probiotic/prebiotic supplements; chronic use of antacids; use of antibiotics within the preceding 3 months of enrollment; clinically significant cardiovascular or respiratory disease; liver disease; alcohol or drug dependence; body weight >350 lb; active malignancy; and chronic infections. Eligibility will be assessed by the researchers using a screening questionnaire and phone interview.

The overall study design is described in Figure 1, and the outcome measures are described individually below. Anthropometric data (weight, BMI, waist circumference) and food intake (3-day weighed food record) will be collected at baseline and at 4 week intervals. Subjective ratings of appetite will be measured using validated visual analogue scales (VAS) by the subjects at home on a weekly basis. At baseline and follow-up (12 weeks), body composition will be measured by DXA, and an oral glucose tolerance test will be performed to assess glucose tolerance. Plasma inflammatory markers (including TNF-α and CRP), lipids (total, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride), and satiety hormones (including GLP-1, PYY, ghrelin and leptin) will be measured using methods already established in the laboratory and described below. Subjects will be provided with an ad libitum lunch buffet to measure objective food intake. Serum samples will undergo metabolomics analysis using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) [39]. 1H-NMR will allow us to measure global metabolic responses which will complement the plasma biomarkers concurrently measured. Stool samples will be collected for analysis of gut microbiota and for fecal water metabolomics using 1H-NMR.

Figure 1

Overall study design of the fibre supplementation intervention.

Dietary intervention and novel food product development

Participants in the active arm of the intervention will consume biscuits containing 5 g of pea fibre per serving three times per day, within 30 min of their 3 largest daily meals. The control group will consume an isocaloric amount of a control biscuit that is similar in taste and texture but contains no pea fibre. To minimize gastrointestinal discomforts associated with a rapid increase in fibre intake, the dose will be slowly increased during the first 3 weeks of the study (week 1 = 5 g/d; week 2 = 10 g/d; week 3 = 15 g/d). The biscuits will be formulated with a low energy content and will be designed and produced at the Food Processing Development Center of Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development (Leduc, AB). Biscuits will be produced in Leduc and shipped to Calgary. Each subject will record the time the product was consumed on a calendar provided by the investigators. Subjects will be instructed to return all biscuit packages and any unconsumed biscuits for counting to assess compliance and actual intake. Subjects will maintain their ad libitum habitual food intake during the intervention, which will be monitored via completion of monthly 3-day weighed food records. The study is designed to examine the effects of pea hull fibre supplementation in a real-life setting, independent of any other diet or exercise intervention; therefore, subjects will be encouraged to maintain their regular lifestyle, to eat until comfortably full and not to consciously try to gain or lose weight throughout the study. At the end of the study an informal interview will be conducted to assess whether or not the subjects remained unaware of the treatment they received.

Laboratory analyses and outcome measurements

Anthropometrics and dual X-ray absorptiometry

Height, weight, BMI, and waist circumference will be measured at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter during clinical visits with research staff. Body weight will be measured using a standard balance beam scale. Waist circumference will be measured at the level of the umbilicus using a tape measure by the same research staff member at all visits. Percent fat mass and lean mass will be measured using a whole body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan (Hologic QDR 4500, Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA). These results will be used in conjunction with Hologic QDR software to determine lean mass, bone mineral content and fat mass. Bone mineral density (BMD) and percent fat will also be determined.

Food record

Food and beverage intake will be assessed using 3-day weighed food records at baseline and every four weeks thereafter using food scales and standardized forms provided to the subjects. As described above, subjects will not be prescribed specific diets and will instead be encouraged to maintain their habitual intake. Prior to the start of the study all subjects will attend a training session delivered by a Registered Dietitian in which they will be instructed on the use of the food scale and how to record their food intake. Subjects will then be instructed to weigh and record all food consumed for 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day. This information will be analyzed with FoodWorks software (The Nutrition Company, Long Valley, NJ). Participants will be instructed to maintain their current level of physical activity throughout the study. Physical activity will be monitored using the Godin’s Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire which will be completed at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks.

Subjective and objective assessments of appetite

Subjective ratings of appetite will be recorded by participants at home on a weekly basis using a validated 100 mm VAS [40, 41]. The questions are:

  1. 1)

    “How hungry do you feel?” anchored by “I am not hungry at all” and “I have never been more hungry”.

  2. 2)

    “How satisfied do you feel?” anchored by “I am completely empty” and “I cannot eat another bite”.

  3. 3)

    “How strong is your desire to eat” anchored by “I have no desire to eat” and “I have a great desire to eat”.

  4. 4)

    “How full do you feel?” anchored by “Not at all full” and “Totally full”.

  5. 5)

    “How much do you think you could eat?” anchored by “Nothing at all” and “A lot”.

At baseline and end of the study (week 12), an ad libitum lunch buffet protocol will be performed to objectively assess food intake. This buffet-style provision of foods has been shown to be highly reproducible for the measurement of energy intake and macronutrient preferences [4244]. The ad libitum lunch will be served following the OGTT (3 hours after taking the oral glucose drink). The subjects will be instructed to eat until "comfortable satisfaction," and each subject's energy intake will be measured. Conversation between subjects will be monitored such that normal conversation will be allowed as long as the topics do not involve food, appetite, or related issues [43]. The lunch will consist of two food choices. The first will be a savory food (i.e. cheese pizza) and the second a sweet food (i.e. cookies) [45, 46]. The energy content of the food choices will be pre-determined, and subjects will be given a pre-weighed amount of the two choices and allowed to eat until satisfied. Though the food quantity will be pre-determined, each item will be provided in an amount corresponding to a reasonable surplus, so no researcher-imposed limit is placed on the subject’s consumption. Upon meal completion, the remaining food not consumed by the subjects will be weighed by research staff. Subjective ratings of appetite using the VAS will be collected immediately before and after the ad libitum meal. The acceptability of the meal will be assessed with the following question, “How acceptable or pleasing did you find the meal?” anchored by “Not at all acceptable” and “Highly acceptable”.

Oral glucose tolerance test

At baseline (day 0) and follow-up (wk 12) after an overnight fast, glucose tolerance will be assessed with an OGTT. A cannula will be inserted into the antecubital vein to allow for repeated blood draws. Following an overnight fast, a baseline blood sample will be drawn. Subjects will be given a 75 g oral glucose drink and additional blood samples taken at time = 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes by registered nurses. Blood will be centrifuged and plasma frozen at -80°C for subsequent analyses. Glucose will be quantified using a glucose trinder assay (Stan Bio, Boerne, TX, USA).

Plasma lipids and inflammatory markers

At baseline and follow-up a fasting blood sample will be taken for measurement of plasma HbA1c, lipids and CRP. Samples will be sent to Calgary Laboratory Services for analysis. Serum inflammatory markers (adiponectin, leptin, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8) will be quantified using Milliplex kits (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

Satiety hormones

At each of the five time points during the OGTT, additional blood samples will be collected for measurement of satiety hormones. Blood will be drawn into a cooled EDTA vacutainer tube containing diprotinin-A (0.034 mg/ml blood; MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA); Sigma protease inhibitor (1 mg/ml blood; Sigma Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada) and Roche Pefabloc (1 mg/ml of blood; Roche, Mississauga, ON, Canada) [13]. Blood will be centrifuged within 30 min and plasma analyzed for ghrelin (active), insulin, leptin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (total), GLP-1 (active), and PYY (total) concentrations using a Human Gut Hormone Panel Milliplex Kit (Millipore, St Charles, MO).

Gut microbiota

Stool will be collected at baseline and follow-up for analysis of gut microbiota. Subjects will be instructed on proper methods for stool sample collection and all materials will be provided in a convenient specimen collection kit. Each subject will collect 2 tablespoons of stool into a pre-labeled sterile container. The container will be sealed, placed in a biohazard bag, and immediately stored in a standard home freezer (-20C). The specimen will be transported to our research lab within 4 days of collection in a styrofoam container on an ice pack.

For analysis of gut bacteria species, total bacterial DNA will be extracted from the frozen fecal samples using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON). Bacterial DNA concentrations will be measured using the Pico-Green DNA Quantification Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Microbiota will be quantified using quantitative PCR according to our previous work [47] using the BioRad iCycler (BioRad Inc., Mississauga, ON) and group-specific primers. Briefly, amplification and detection will be conducted in 96-well plates with SYBR Green 2 × qPCR Master Mix (BioRad). Group specific primers have been previously published [47]. The 16S rRNA gene copies value will be calculated according the following webpage: using average genome sizes. Standard curves will be normalized to the copy number of the 16S rRNA gene obtained from the following webpage:

Serum metabolomics

Metabolomics analysis provides a snapshot of an organism’s current metabolic profile. Beyond measurement of single metabolites, applying principal component analysis (PCA) to metabolomics data allows for the relationships between variables to be determined, thereby identifying a metabolic signature [48]. Sample preparation and metabolomics analysis will be performed according to our previous work [39]. Briefly, following sample preparation, including filtering and pH standardization, all NMR experiments will be performed on a Bruker Advance 600 spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Milton, Canada). Processed spectra will be imported into Chenomx NMR Suite software (Edmonton, AB) for metabolite identification and quantification. In order to describe the metabolite changes in the context of other physiological variables, metabolomic data will be integrated with the other biological variables assessed (blood biochemistry, satiety hormones, body composition) using O2PLS-DA (orthogonal partial least squares discriminatory analysis) modeling [39, 49].

Fecal water metabolomics

The fecal samples collected at baseline and 12 weeks will be used for fecal water 1H-NMR metabolomic analysis. The NMR sample preparation protocol will be based on previously published work that has been shown to maximize retrieval of SCFAs from the fecal samples [50]. 1H-NMR spectra will be acquired on a Bruker Advance 600 spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Milton, Canada) operating at 600.22 MHz, and multivariate analysis of metabolic profiles will be performed using SIMCA-P + 12.0.1 software (Umetrics). The PCA and O-PLS-DA models of the fecal water extracts are expected to show separation between the control and pea fibre groups based on metabolite concentrations involved in gut microbiota activity resulting from fibre fermentation.

Sample size calculation

Sample size was calculated based on anticipated changes in body fat using data from our previous study of prebiotic fibre supplementation in overweight and obese adults [13]. The expected change in body fat in the pulse fibre group is -1.11 kg whereas the expected weight change in the control group is +0.20 kg, with a standard deviation of ±1.6 kg. Assuming an alpha = 0.05 and power = 0.80 (80%) we would need to recruit 24 subjects in each study arm. An additional 6 patients per group will be added to account for the expected 20% loss to follow up for a total of 30 patients per group.

Statistical analysis

Data will be analyzed using SPSS statistical program (IBM Software, Armonk, NY) with results considered statistically significant (2-sided) at P ≤ 0.05. Values with skewed distribution will be logarithmically transformed prior to analysis. Baseline characteristics will be compared between groups using chi-square for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Primary analysis will be performed on an intent-to-treat basis, regardless of subject compliance. The primary outcome measure is change from baseline to 12 weeks in body fat. ANCOVA, with testing for confounding factors (sex) and potential covariates (BMI, age) will be used to assess the difference between groups at weeks 0 and 12. Should the main effect of diet be significant, Tukey’s multiple comparison test will be used. Secondary outcomes measured at 0 to 12 weeks (e.g. satiety hormones, glycemia, insulinemia, food intake) will be analyzed with ANCOVA as above. For variables measured over time (e.g. body weight, satiety hormones and glucose at 0, 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes), a mixed model of repeated measures ANCOVA will be applied to examine the effect of treatment, time and their interaction. Our planned secondary analysis will be per protocol with all subjects who complete the 12 week intervention and are compliant based on consumption of ≥80% the product doses. Cases with missing outcome data will be excluded from analysis.

For metabolomics analysis, in addition to univariate tests, multivariate analysis will conducted using SIMCA-P + 12.0.1 software (Umetrics, Sweden). Data will be reprocessed by mean-centering and unit variance scaling. A supervised partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) approach will be used to compare the variance of metabolite concentrations between the two sample classes (diet: control and pea fibre). A supervised orthogonal partial least squares analysis will be used (control versus pea fibre) for a direct comparison of the variance between diet type (Y variable) and metabolite concentrations (X variable). The results from the metabolomics analysis will also be combined with the plasma satiety hormones and other biological measurements and regressed to the diet type using O2-PLS-DA (orthogonal PLS-DA).


This proposal has been approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary. Voluntary, written informed consent will be obtained from each participant.


The proposed study will determine whether increased consumption of fibre derived from yellow peas enhances weight loss and specifically body fat loss compared to control. In addition, the effect of pea fibre on glucose tolerance, appetite, serum lipids and inflammatory markers will also be determined. Mechanisms related to changes in gut microbiota and serum and fecal water metabolites will be examined. The goal of this research is to provide evidence for the potential role of pulse-derived fibre in weight management. This work is important in light of the growing interest by consumers, food manufacturers and health care professionals in functional foods that impact long-term health.

The global functional food market has expanded substantially in recent years, and is expected to continue growing in the coming years [51, 52]. For example, from 2000 to 2006 the global functional food market increased by 68% [51]. This growing market for functional foods has spurred development of research-oriented businesses that in 2004 generated annual revenues of $2.9 billion and exported $545 million worth of products in Canada alone [53]. As compared to drug development, functional food development has the advantages of shorter development periods and lower development costs [54]. Development of the functional food product sector is beneficial for consumers, the agri-food sector, and public health [51, 54]. Indeed, a significant proportion of research and development in major food companies is directed towards developing “healthful” foods [55]. In particular, food products aimed at gut health dominate the functional food markets in Japan and Europe, including both probiotic- and prebiotic-fortified foods [54].

In the current study, pulse fibre will be incorporated into a cookie-type biscuit that will be consumed 30 minutes prior to a meal, thereby acting as a meal pre-load. Consuming the biscuit between meals has implications for snacking behaviors and potential new snack foods. Modifying snack options presents a key area to expand research in dietary supplements as snacking is prevalent [56]. Not only does snacking displace healthy nutrient-dense foods but the energy density of snacks has also increased over time such that the contribution of snacking to overall energy intake is substantial (24% by one estimation) [56, 57]. However, snacking is not necessarily a negative eating behavior, because it depends on food choices. For example, one study found that high-frequency snack consumption occurred in individuals with both healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns [58]. Given the increased prevalence of snacking in combination with the increase in food consumption away from home and desire for convenient food products [59, 60], snack foods represent an ideal behavior to modify by replacing currently consumed food options with more nutrient-dense options that are attractive and palatable, and that also have the potential to positively affect health outcomes. Ideal snacks would be those which are healthy and balanced in macronutrient proportions; provide functional nutrients that individuals may not otherwise consume; and are portable without requirement for preparatory methods, so they can be incorporated easily into daily consumption at home or work.

Ultimately, this project will determine whether yellow pea fibre has the potential to be incorporated as a functional food ingredient in products aimed at weight management and metabolic health.

Authors’ information

HJV holds the Armstrong Chair for Molecular Cancer Research.



Body mass index


C-reactive protein


Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry


Glycemic load


Glucagon-like peptide-1


Proton nuclear magnetic resonance


Hemoglobin A1C


Oral glucose tolerance test


Orthogonal partial least squares discriminatory analysis


Peptide YY


Tumor necrosis factor alpha


Visual analogue scale.


  1. 1.

    Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institute for Health Information: Obesity in Canada: a Joint Report from the Public Health Agency of Canada and Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2011,,

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grover SA, Coupal L, Kaouache M, Lowensteyn I: Preventing cardiovascular disease among Canadians: what are the potential benefits of treating hypertension or dyslipidemia?. Can J Cardiol. 2007, 23: 467-473. 10.1016/S0828-282X(07)70786-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V, Wyatt HR, Hill JO: The medical cost of cardiometabolic risk factor clusters in the United States. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15: 3150-3158. 10.1038/oby.2007.375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Clemens R, Kranz S, Mobley AR, Nicklas TA, Raimondi MP, Rodriguez JC, Slavin JL, Warshaw H: Filling America’s fiber intake gap: summary of a roundtable to probe realistic solutions with a focus on grain-based foods. J Nutr. 2012, 142: 1390S-1401S. 10.3945/jn.112.160176.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Institute of Medicine: Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. 2005, Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Health Canada: Do Canadian Adults Meet Their Nutrient Requirements through Food Intake Alone?. 2012,,

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Parnell JA, Reimer RA: Prebiotic fiber modulation of the gut microbiota improves risk factors for obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Gut Microbes. 2012, 3: 29-34. 10.4161/gmic.19246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kaczmarczyk MM, Miller MJ, Freund GG: The health benefits of dietary fiber: beyond the usual suspects of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and colon cancer. Metabolism. 2012, 61: 1058-1066. 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.01.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    McCrory MA, Hamaker BR, Lovejoy JC, Eichelsdoerfer PE: Pulse consumption, satiety, and weight management. Adv Nutr. 2010, 1: 17-30. 10.3945/an.110.1006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Elia M, Cummings JH: Physiological aspects of energy metabolism and gastrointestinal effects of carbohydrates. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007, 61 (Suppl 1): S40-S74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Silva FM, Kramer CK, de Almeida JC, Steemburgo T, Gross JL, Azevedo MJ: Fiber intake and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev. 2013, 71: 790-801. 10.1111/nure.12076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Griffiths C, Krzeminska K, Lawrie JA, Bennett CM, Goff DV, Sarson DL, Bloom SR: Slow release dietary carbohydrate improves second meal tolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982, 35: 1339-1346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Parnell JA, Reimer RA: Weight loss during oligofructose supplementation is associated with decreased ghrelin and increased peptide YY in overweight and obese adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 1751-1759. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27465.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA: Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005, 308: 1635-1638. 10.1126/science.1110591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI: A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009, 457: 480-484. 10.1038/nature07540.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI: Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006, 444: 1022-1023. 10.1038/4441022a.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang X, Shen D, Fang Z, Jie Z, Qiu X, Zhang C, Chen Y, Ji L: Human gut microbiota changes reveal the progression of glucose intolerance. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e71108-10.1371/journal.pone.0071108.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mouzaki M, Comelli EM, Arendt BM, Bonengel J, Fung SK, Fischer SE, McGilvray ID, Allard JP: Intestinal microbiota in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2013, 58: 120-127. 10.1002/hep.26319.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kong L-C, Tap J, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Pelloux V, Basdevant A, Bouillot J-L, Zucker J-D, Doré J, Clément K: Gut microbiota after gastric bypass in human obesity: increased richness and associations of bacterial genera with adipose tissue genes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013, 98: 16-24. 10.3945/ajcn.113.058743.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dewulf EM, Cani PD, Claus SP, Fuentes S, Puylaert PGB, Neyrinck AM, Bindels LB, de Vos WM, Gibson GR, Thissen J-P, Delzenne NM: Insight into the prebiotic concept: lessons from an exploratory, double blind intervention study with inulin-type fructans in obese women. Gut. 2013, 62: 1112-1121. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303304.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, Gordon JI, Relman DA, Fraser-Liggett CM, Nelson KE: Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006, 312: 1355-1359. 10.1126/science.1124234.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Topping DL, Clifton PM: Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev. 2001, 81: 1031-1064.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Delzenne NM, Cani PD: Interaction between obesity and the gut microbiota: relevance in nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 2011, 31: 15-31. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-072610-145146.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Le Poul E, Loison C, Struyf S, Springael J-Y, Lannoy V, Decobecq M-E, Brezillon S, Dupriez V, Vassart G, Van Damme J, Parmentier M, Detheux M: Functional characterization of human receptors for short chain fatty acids and their role in polymorphonuclear cell activation. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 25481-25489. 10.1074/jbc.M301403200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tolhurst G, Heffron H, Lam YS, Parker HE, Habib AM, Diakogiannaki E, Cameron J, Grosse J, Reimann F, Gribble FM: Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes. 2012, 61: 364-371. 10.2337/db11-1019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kimura I, Ozawa K, Inoue D, Imamura T, Kimura K, Maeda T, Terasawa K, Kashihara D, Hirano K, Tani T, Takahashi T, Miyauchi S, Shioi G, Inoue H, Tsujimoto G: The gut microbiota suppresses insulin-mediated fat accumulation via the short-chain fatty acid receptor GPR43. Nat Commun. 1829, 2013: 4-

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Curran J: The nutritional value and health benefits of pulses in relation to obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Br J Nutr. 2012, 108 (Suppl): S1-S2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Alberta Pulse Growers: Pulse varieties and management.,

  29. 29.

    Sosulski FW, Wu KK: High-fiber breads containing field pea hulls, wheat, corn, and wild oat brans. Cereal Chem. 1983, 65: 186-191.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Whitlock KA, Kozicky L, Jin A, Yee H, Ha C, Morris J, Field CJ, Bell RC, Ozga JA, Chan CB: Assessment of the mechanisms exerting glucose-lowering effects of dried peas in glucose-intolerant rats. Br J Nutr. 2012, 108 (Suppl): S91-S102.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Marinangeli CPF, Krause D, Harding SV, Rideout TC, Zhu F, Jones PJH: Whole and fractionated yellow pea flours modulate insulin, glucose, oxygen consumption, and the caecal microbiome in Golden Syrian hamsters. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011, 36: 811-820. 10.1139/h11-101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dubois C, Cara L, Armand M, Borel P, Senft M, Portugal H, Pauli AM, Bernard PM, Lafont H, Lairon D: Effects of pea and soybean fibre on postprandial lipaemia and lipoproteins in healthy adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993, 47: 508-520.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Raben A, Christensen NJ, Madsen J, Holst JJ, Astrup A: Decreased postprandial thermogenesis and fat oxidation but increased fullness after a high-fiber meal compared with a low-fiber meal. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994, 59: 1386-1394.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hamberg O, Rumessen JJ, Gudmand-Høyer E: Blood glucose response to pea fiber: comparisons with sugar beet fiber and wheat bran. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989, 50: 324-328.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Dahl WJ, Whiting SJ, Healey A, Zello GA, Hildebrandt SL: Increased stool frequency occurs when finely processed pea hull fiber is added to usual foods consumed by elderly residents in long-term care. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003, 103: 1199-1202. 10.1016/S0002-8223(03)00977-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sandström B, Hansen LT, Sørensen A: Pea fiber lowers fasting and postprandial blood triglyceride concentrations in humans. J Nutr. 1994, 124: 2386-2396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Marinangeli CPF, Kassis AN, Jones PJH: Glycemic responses and sensory characteristics of whole yellow pea flour added to novel functional foods. J Food Sci. 2009, 74: S385-S389. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01347.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Marinangeli CPF, Jones PJH: Whole and fractionated yellow pea flours reduce fasting insulin and insulin resistance in hypercholesterolaemic and overweight human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2011, 105: 110-117. 10.1017/S0007114510003156.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Reimer RA, Maurer AD, Eller LK, Hallam MC, Shaykhutdinov R, Vogel HJ, Weljie AM: Satiety hormone and metabolomic response to an intermittent high energy diet differs in rats consuming long-term diets high in protein or prebiotic fiber. J Proteome Res. 2012, 11: 4065-4074. 10.1021/pr300487s.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Stubbs RJ, Hughes DA, Johnstone AM, Rowley E, Reid C, Elia M, Stratton R, Delargy H, King N, Blundell JE: The use of visual analogue scales to assess motivation to eat in human subjects: a review of their reliability and validity with an evaluation of new hand-held computerized systems for temporal tracking of appetite ratings. Br J Nutr. 2000, 84: 405-415. 10.1017/S0007114500001719.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Blundell J, de Graaf C, Hulshof T, Jebb S, Livingstone B, Lluch A, Mela D, Salah S, Schuring E, van der Knaap H, Westerterp M: Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. Obes Rev. 2010, 11: 251-270. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00714.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Arvaniti K, Richard D, Tremblay A: Reproducibility of energy and macronutrient intake and related substrate oxidation rates in a buffet-type meal. Br J Nutr. 2000, 83: 489-495.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gregersen NT, Flint A, Bitz C, Blundell JE, Raben A, Astrup A: Reproducibility and power of ad libitum energy intake assessed by repeated single meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 1277-1281.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Venti CA, Votruba SB, Franks PW, Krakoff J, Salbe AD: Reproducibility of ad libitum energy intake with the use of a computerized vending machine system. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 343-348. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28315.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wong CL, Mollard RC, Zafar TA, Luhovyy BL, Anderson GH: Food intake and satiety following a serving of pulses in young men: effect of processing, recipe, and pulse variety. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009, 28: 543-552. 10.1080/07315724.2009.10719786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Freeland KR, Anderson GH, Wolever TMS: Acute effects of dietary fibre and glycaemic carbohydrate on appetite and food intake in healthy males. Appetite. 2009, 52: 58-64. 10.1016/j.appet.2008.08.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bomhof MR, Saha DC, Reid DT, Paul HA, Reimer RA: Combined effects of oligofructose and Bifidobacterium animalis on gut microbiota and glycemia in obese rats. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014, 22: 763-771. 10.1002/oby.20632.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jansen JJ, Szymańska E, Hoefsloot HCJ, Jacobs DM, Strassburg K, Smilde AK: Between Metabolite Relationships: an essential aspect of metabolic change. Metabolomics. 2012, 8: 422-432. 10.1007/s11306-011-0316-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjöström L, Mellerowicz EJ, Edlund U, Shockcor JP, Gottfries J, Moritz T, Trygg J: Visualization of GC/TOF-MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Anal Chem. 2008, 80: 115-122. 10.1021/ac0713510.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bezabeh T, Somorjai RL, Smith ICP: MR metabolomics of fecal extracts: applications in the study of bowel diseases. Magn Reson Chem. 2009, 47 (Suppl 1): S54-S61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Blandon J, Cranfield J, Henson S: Functional Food and Natural Health Product Issues: The Canadian and International Context. 2007,,

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Verbeke W: Consumer acceptance of functional foods: socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Qual Prefer. 2005, 16: 45-57. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Palinic R: Results from the Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals Survey - 2005. 2005,]

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Siró I, Kápolna E, Kápolna B, Lugasi A: Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance--a review. Appetite. 2008, 51: 456-467. 10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hasler CM: Functional foods: benefits, concerns and challenges-a position paper from the american council on science and health. J Nutr. 2002, 132: 3772-3781.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bertéus Forslund H, Torgerson JS, Sjöström L, Lindroos AK: Snacking frequency in relation to energy intake and food choices in obese men and women compared to a reference population. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29: 711-719. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Piernas C, Popkin BM: Snacking increased among U.S. adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr. 2010, 140: 325-332. 10.3945/jn.109.112763.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hartmann C, Siegrist M, van der Horst K: Snack frequency: associations with healthy and unhealthy food choices. Public Health Nutr. 2013, 16: 1487-1496. 10.1017/S1368980012003771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Smith LP, Ng SW, Popkin BM: Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965-1966 to 2007-2008. Nutr J. 2013, 12: 45-10.1186/1475-2891-12-45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nielsen SJ, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM: Trends in energy intake in U.S. between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obes Res. 2002, 10: 370-378. 10.1038/oby.2002.51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


This work is funded by Alberta Innovates – Health Solutions, Alberta Innovates – Bio Solutions and Alberta Pulse Growers Commission. The funding agencies had no role in the design of the study or preparation of this manuscript, and will have no influence on the data collection, analysis, and interpretation or manuscript publication.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raylene A Reimer.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This work is partially funded by the Alberta Pulse Growers Commission.

Authors’ contributions

JEL drafted the manuscript. JAP participated in design of the study related to gut microbiota analysis and dietary fibre dosing, and provided manuscript revisions. JH and TS participated in design of the study related to food product development and packaging, and provided manuscript revisions. HAP participated in design of the study related to gut microbiota and metabolomics analysis and provided manuscript revisions. HJV participated in design of the study related to metabolomics analysis and provided manuscript revisions. RAR conceived of the study and was involved in the overall design, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, J.E., Parnell, J.A., Han, J. et al. Evaluation of yellow pea fibre supplementation on weight loss and the gut microbiota: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 14, 69 (2014).

Download citation


  • Yellow pea fibre
  • Gut microbiota
  • Metabolomics
  • Obesity