Skip to main content

Table 2 Technical success, clinical outcome, dysphagia evolution and reinterventions after temporary placement of 3 different self-expanding stents for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures

From: A comparison of the temporary placement of 3 different self-expanding stents for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures: a prospective multicentre study

 

SEPS (n = 10)

BD Stent (N = 10)

FCSEMS (n = 10)

 P 

Technical success, n (%)

10 (100%)

10 (100%)

10 (100%)

-

Clinical success

1 (10%)

3 (30%)

4 (40%)

0.27

Dysphagia score, mean (±SD)

At 4 weeks

0.7 (0.48)

0.4 (0.52)

0.5 (0.53)

0.4

Post-stenting

2.4 (1.26)

2.0 (0.82)

1.6 (1.26)

0.23

Time to dysphagia recurrence (weeks), mean (range)

4.3 (2–9)

3.8 (2–9)

3.8 (2–8)

0.75

Reinterventions, n

24

13

13

0.24

Final outcome, n (%)

   

-

Successful treatment

1 (10%)

3 (30%)

4 (40%)

 

Repeat stenting

2 (20%)

1 (10%)

3 (30%)

 

Dilatations

1 (10%)

3 (30%)

2 (20%)

 

Surgery

6 (60%)

3 (30%)

1 (10%)

 

Follow-up (months), median (range)

43 (16–66)

18.5 (11–21)

10 (8–12)

-

  1. SEPS Self-expandable plastic stent, BD Biodegradable, FCSEMS Fully cover self-expandable metal stent, Time to dysphagia recurrence in patients without clinical success, Post-stenting score in all patients after dysphagia recurrence/long-term free of dysphagia.