Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in enteroendocrine cells and macrophages of the small bowel in patients with severe irritable bowel syndrome

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 3, 5 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Gastroenterology201010:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-19

©  Dlugosz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

  • Received: 10 August 2009
  • Accepted: 16 February 2010
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Inflammation and immune activation have repeatedly been suggested as pathogentic factors in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The driving force for immune activation in IBS remains unknown. The aim of our study was to find out if the obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia could be involved in the pathogenesis of IBS.

Methods

We studied 65 patients (61 females) with IBS and 42 (29 females) healthy controls in which IBS had been excluded. Full thickness biopsies from the jejunum and mucosa biopsies from the duodenum and the jejunum were stained with a monoclonal antibody to Chlamydia lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and species-specific monoclonal antibodies to C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae. We used polyclonal antibodies to chromogranin A, CD68, CD11c, and CD117 to identify enteroendocrine cells, macrophages, dendritic, and mast cells, respectively.

Results

Chlamydia LPS was present in 89% of patients with IBS, but in only 14% of healthy controls (p < 0.001) and 79% of LPS-positive biopsies were also positive for C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Staining for C. pneumoniae was negative in both patients and controls. Chlamydia LPS was detected in enteroendocrine cells of the mucosa in 90% of positive biopsies and in subepithelial macrophages in 69% of biopsies. Biopsies taken at different time points in 19 patients revealed persistence of Chlamydia LPS up to 11 years. The odds ratio for the association of Chlamydia LPS with presence of IBS (43.1; 95% CI: 13.2-140.7) is much higher than any previously described pathogenetic marker in IBS.

Conclusions

We found C. trachomatis antigens in enteroendocrine cells and macrophages in the small bowel mucosa of patients with IBS. Further studies are required to clarify if the presence of such antigens has a role in the pathogenesis of IBS.

Keywords

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Chlamydia Trachomatis
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patient
  • Enteroendocrine Cell
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Background

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder that may affect as many as 9%-15% of the population in Western countries [1–3]. IBS is characterized by abdominal pain and disturbed bowel function in the absence of a detectable organic disease, which may explain the symptoms [4]. The presence of disturbed gut function in IBS may indicate an underlying pathology in control systems or effectors of the gut. We have previously reported lymphocytic infiltration and neuron damage in myenteric ganglia when full-thickness biopsies from the jejunum in 10 patients with severe IBS were investigated [5], and there are many reports that have highlighted signs of an activated immune system as a putative pathogenetic mechanism in IBS (for review see de Giorgio [6]). However, the aetiology of observed immune activation remains unsolved.

Studies have repeatedly indicated that IBS can arise after an acute gastroenteritis. The underlying mechanism of post-infectious IBS has not been established but ongoing inflammation appears to play a role, with an increase in enteroendocrine cells, lymphocytes, mast cells, and proinflammatory cytokines (for review, see Spiller[7]). However, in a recent study of ours the actual agent causing gastroenteritis was not a predictor of risk for IBS [8]. Consequently, a host factor, such as a pre-existing chronic infection with a different microbe than the agent causing gastroenteritis, might explain the development of IBS. We presumed that a candidate agent should be compatible with an asymptomatic carrier-ship, have a preference for female gender, and have the ability to become persistent and to live in bowel epithelium. There are some observations to support the idea that a persistent infection with Chlamydia trachomatis might constitute such a host factor. Trachoma-related blindness is 2-4 times more likely to affect females compared to males [9]. It is known that IBS occurs in 35%-50% of females with chronic pelvic pain syndrome, which is believed to often be caused by chronic infection with C. trachomatis [10–12]. A previous attempt to link C. trachomatis to IBS using serum IgG antibodies failed [13], but IgG antibody patterns may be insufficient to rule out persistence of Chlamydia due a dominating cellular immune response to infection [14, 15]. Since we had previously found inflammation in mucosa and enteric ganglia of the jejunum in patients with IBS we decided to reanalyze archived biopsy material to find out if Chlamydia antigens are present in the small bowel in this group of patients.

Methods

Patients

All patients fulfilled Rome-II criteria for IBS [4]. A total of 65 patients (61 females and 4 males) with a median age of 48 (range 22-67) years and a median duration of IBS symptoms of 6.5 years (range 0.6-33.2 years) were investigated. Diarrhoea predominant IBS was present in 21 patients (32%), 22 patients (34%) had constipation predominant IBS and 22 patients (34%) had IBS with alternating bowel habits. All patients had severe symptoms of IBS [5] and 26 patients also exhibited abnormalities on small bowel manometry, thus qualifying for a pathophysiological diagnosis of enteric dysmotility [16]. Full thickness jejunum biopsies had been taken in 60 of our patients. Previous histopathological analysis had revealed neuropathic changes in 58 patients [5, 17, 18]. Neuropathy was associated with low-grade inflammation (LG = lymphocytic ganglionitis) in 46 patients and 20 of these also exhibited increased numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes (LEG = lymphocytic epithelio-ganglionitis), whereas 12 patients had degenerative neuropathy (DN) without inflammation. Deficient staining for alpha-actin without neuronal damage was observed in 2 patients.

Controls

The control group comprised 42 persons (29 females) in whom IBS and all other functional bowel disorders had been excluded by medical interview and a validated questionnaire for the Rome-II symptom criteria. Ten controls (7 females) were obese but otherwise healthy (BMI mean = 42.8, SD = 4.3). The rest of the control group (32 persons, 22 females) consisted of healthy volunteers. The median age of the controls was 36 (range 19-60) years.

Full thickness jejunum biopsy

Previously obtained full-thickness biopsy specimens were available in 60/65 patients. The biopsies had been taken from the proximal jejunum using a laparoscopy-assisted procedure described by Tornblom et al[5] Ten obese controls underwent full thickness biopsy of the jejunum at the time of gastric by-pass surgery.

Mucosa biopsy

Mucosa specimens from the proximal jejunum were taken with a Watson capsule in 32 controls and 6 patients. The capsule was swallowed by the subject and brought by peristalsis to a position distal to the ligament of Treitz as determined by fluoroscopy. We analyzed archived endoscopic mucosa biopsies from the duodenum of 20 patients and in 15 of these full thickness biopsies were also available. In 2 patients we analyzed mucosa biopsies from both the jejunum and the duodenum.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence was performed using a genus-specific mouse monoclonal antibody to Chlamydia lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-FITC conjugated with Evans blue (RDI-PROAC1FT, Fitzgerald Industries International, Concord, MA, USA) and C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP) as primary antibody (GeneTex, San Antonio, TX, USA) with a polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse antibody-FITC conjugated (Dako, Glostrup, Danmark) as the secondary antibody. We used cultured HeLa-cells infected with C. trachomatis as positive control and uninfected cells as negative control. We used a species-specific mouse monoclonal antibody for C. pneumoniae as primary antibody (GeneTex, San Antonio, TX, USA) with a polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse antibody-FITC conjugated (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) as the secondary antibody. The presence of Chlamydia LPS was also evaluated using immunohistochemistry with a polyclonal rabbit antibody to C. trachomatis LPS (Fitzgerald Industries International, Concord, MA) and an immunoenzymatic assay with Streptavidin-biotin complex (Dako, Glostrup, Danmark).

Enteroendocrine cells were identified using rabbit polyclonal antibodies to Chromogranin A (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and we used rabbit polyclonal antibodies to CD117 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for mast cells, rabbit polyclonal antibodies to CD68 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for macrophages and rabbit monoclonal antibodies to CD11c (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for dendritic cells. Goat anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 568 or Alexia Fluor 350 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used as secondary antibody for all of the rabbit antibodies.

Stained sections were examined using a Universal Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope System Leica TCS and a Fluorescent Microscope System Leica DMRXA (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Two independent investigators (AD and GM), who were unaware of clinical data, made the final assessment of slides. The slides were reviewed by a third investigator (BV). The immunofluorescence stainings were considered positive if more than one cell showed fluorescence. If only one positive cell was found, the staining-procedure was repeated. The case was regarded positive if the colour signal was again present, otherwise the case was recorded as negative. Double immunofluorescence stainings were also performed for the identification of LPS-positive cells (LPS with chromogranin, CD68, CD117, or CD11c, respectively).

Western blotting

Snap-frozen biopsies from 4 patients that were positive for Chlamydia LPS staining, were examined by Western blotting. HeLa cells infected with C. trachomatis served as positive control and we used non-infected HeLa cells as negative control. Equivalent amounts of protein from each specimen were loaded onto a sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, samples were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. We used a mouse monoclonal antibody to C. trachomatis LPS (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) as primary antibody and goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (BioRad, Herculaes, CA, USA) as secondary antibody. For MOMP we used the same primary antibody as for immunofluorescence.

MicroLaser system

We used Laser Microdissection Pressure Catapulting (LMPC) for laser based non-contact extraction of tissue areas in paraffin embedded biopsies from 6 patients. Regions of interest were manually delineated using fluorescence microscopy and the LMPC software. Tissue collection was achieved by laser cutting along the delineation lines to separate tissue of interest from surrounding regions, and secondly the laser catapulted the tissue of interest up into the lid of an Eppendorf cap containing sterile water. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA mini kit, according to the instructions of the manufacturer, and analyzed by PCR.

Real-time PCR

In the present study, we used the real-time PCR assay developed by Everett et al. [19], which amplifies 23S ribosomal DNA, and detects all members of the family Chlamydiaceae. An internal amplification control was included to monitor possible inhibition of the PCR. DNA from frozen biopsies, taken from 4 patients previously positive for Chlamydia LPS staining, was extracted using a Qiagen minikit according to the tissue protocol (Qiagen, Solna, Sweden). Extracted DNA was quantified and quality controlled using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) before being subjected to PCR.

Transmission electron microscopy

Biopsies from the distal duodenum of 4 patients that were positive for Chlamydia LPS staining were fixed according to a procedure described before [20]. Semi-thin sections were cut and stained with toluidin blue and used for light microscopic analysis. Ultra-thin sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate and examined in a Tecnai 10 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV. Digital images were taken by using a MegaView III digital camera (Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany).

Statistical analysis

We used logistic regression with age and gender as covariates for calculation of odds ratios and p-values for comparisons of proportions. The size of the study group was determined from the assumption that LPS positivity would be no greater than 20% among controls. In order to detect a risk factor with an odds ratio of at least 6 at p < 0.01 with power >90% we needed to include at least 37 patients and 37 controls (two-sided test).

Ethical considerations

All parts of the study were approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and controls at the time of biopsy taking.

Results

Immunofluorescence (IF) staining showed that 53/60 patients were positive for Chlamydia LPS in full thickness jejunum biopsies. Positive staining occurred in a few cells both within the epithelium and in lamina propria (Figure 1). No Chlamydia LPS-positive cells were found in the submucosa and muscularis propria or the enteric nervous system. Since we had full thickness biopsies from only 10 controls, we investigated if the finding of LPS-positive cells could be reproduced in biopsies from small bowel mucosa. We investigated mucosal biopsies from 24 of our patients with IBS and 32 controls. Staining of slides from these biopsies yielded similar rates of positive stainings: 21/24 (88%) patients were positive for Chlamydia LPS again in a few cells within the epithelium and in l. propria. In 19 patients biopsies had been taken with a time interval of more than 1 year. Chlamydia LPS was present in biopsies with a median time difference of 5.2 (range 1-11) years. Overall, 58/65 (89%) patients were classified as Chlamydia LPS positive. Six women and one man with IBS were negative in all biopsies.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Fluorescent microscope images of small bowel preparations from patients with IBS A. Chlamydia LPS in EEC-like cells with apical nuclei and strong basal immunofluorescence (arrows). (Monoclonal FITC-conjugated antibody with Evans blue; original magnification × 63). B. Chlamydia LPS in a few cells within the epithelium (thick arrows) and l. propria (thin arrows). (Monoclonal FITC-conjugated antibody with Evans blue; original magnification × 63). C. Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP-positive immunofluorescence within 2 EEC-like cells (arrows) and 4 cells within l. propria (arrowheads). (Mouse MOMP-antibody and FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse antibody; original magnification × 63). Hoechst (DAPI conjugated) for nuclear staining. D-F. Immunostainings for (D) Chlamydia LPS (FITC, green), (E) chromogranin A (Alexia 568, red), and (F) merged showing co-localisation of chromogranin A and Chlamydia LPS in enteroendocrine cells and Chlamydia LPS in l. propria. G-I. Immunostainings for (G) Chlamydia LPS (FITC, green,) (H) CD68 (Alexia 350. blue), and (I) merged showing co-localisation of CD68 and Chlamydia LPS in macrophages (arrows). Three enteroendocrine cells are also positive for Chlamydia LPS (arrowheads).

In 90% of positive biopsies from patients Chlamydia LPS was localised to mucosal cells at the level of the crypts. Double staining with antibodies to chromogranin-A showed that Chlamydia LPS was present in enteroendocrine cells within the epithelium (Figure 1). Chlamydia LPS was found in l. propria cells in 69% of the biopsies from patients. Double staining with antibodies to CD117, CD11c and CD68 revealed that in this location Chlamydia LPS was present in macrophages. Seventy-nine percent of Chlamydia LPS positive biopsies were also positive to C. trachomatis MOMP (Figure 1). Staining for C. pneumoniae was negative in all patients.

Only 6/42 (14%) controls (5 women) were positive for Chlamydia LPS (6 in l. propria macrophages and 2 in enteroendocrine cells) and 2/6 LPS-positive controls were positive to C. trachomatis MOMP. No biopsies from controls were positive for C. pneumoniae. Slides from 10 patients who were positive for Chlamydia LPS in immunofluorescence and 10 negative controls were studied using immunohistochemistry with polyclonal antibodies to Chlamydia LPS and streptavidin-biotin complex. Chlamydia LPS was found in enteroendocrine cells and/or macrophages in all cases whereas all controls remained negative.

The prevalence of Chlamydia LPS was much higher in patients with IBS (58/65) than it was among controls (6/42). The odds ratio, corrected for differences in age and gender distributions, for mucosal Chlamydia LPS being indicative for presence of IBS was 43.1 (95% CI: 13.2-140.7). Biopsies were analysed by two independent investigators unaware of clinical data. The agreement between the two investigators regarding individual biopsies was 94%, whereas their agreement regarding patient classification was 100%.

We found no correlation between presence of Chlamydia antigens and the type of neuropathy in patients with full thickness biopsies. Although the majority of patients had neuropathy with inflammation, Chlamydia antigens were common also among those who had neuropathic changes without inflammation (LEG: 19/20 = 95%; LG 23/26 = 88%; DN 9/12 = 75%). We found no difference between IBS subgroups with regard to positivity for Chlamydia antigens and 19/21 with D-IBS, 22/22 with C-IBS, and 17/22 with A-IBS were LPS positive.

New biopsies were taken from the duodenum mucosa in 4 LPS-positive patients (Table 1). We confirmed the presence of Chlamydia LPS antigen in patients with Western blotting but the new biopsies were negative for C. trachomatis MOMP both in immunofluorescense and Western blot (Figure 2). Electron microscopy revealed small oval structures resembling intermediate bodies of Chlamydia with characteristic condensed nucleoids of nucleic acid (Figure 3). Mitochondria were observed surrounding the inclusions but did not appear to be in close association with the inclusions. We were unable to confirm the presence of Chlamydia DNA in the same biopsies using 23S ribosomal DNA as target. Results were negative for Chlamydia DNA also when we analyzed micro-dissected Chlamydia LPS positive cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Western blot. Western blot analysis of small bowel biopsies from 4 IBS patients against mouse immune sera to LPS and MOMP, respectively. 1-4 = IBS patients, ++ = HeLa cells infected with C. trachomatis (10 μl), + = HeLa cells infected with C. trachomatis (5 μl), - = non-infected HeLa cells.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Transmission electron microscopy. Electron micrograph of the cytoplasm of an enteroendocrine cell from a patient with IBS showing a structure resembling an intermediate body of Chlamydia (arrow) with characteristic condensed nucleoids. Dark homogenous structures are granules. M = Mitochondria, N = Nucleus, Bar = 0.5 μm.

Table 1

Onset of disease and results from immunofluorescence staining for Chlamydia LPS and C. trachomatis MOMP, Western blot, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and electron microscopy (EM) in 4 patients selected for new biopsies

Patient

Onset of IBS symptoms

Archive biopsies

New biopsies

2007

Western blot

2007

PCR

EM

  

Year

LPS

MOMP

LPS

MOMP

LPS

MOMP

2007

2007

1

1994

1996

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

2

1985

2000

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

3

1968

2001

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

4

1977

1997

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

Discussion

We report the novel finding of chlamydial antigens in enteroendocrine cells and macrophages of the small bowel mucosa in patients with severe IBS. LPS and MOMP antigens were detected in mucosa and l. propria of the small bowel in a large majority of patients with IBS, but rarely so in healthy controls. The odds ratio for mucosal Chlamydia LPS being indicative for presence of IBS is much higher than any previously described pathogenetic marker in IBS [21]. These findings raise several questions. The first is whether or not observed immunofluorescence findings represent presence of bacterial antigens. The specificity of the LPS antibody is important in this respect. There is a risk that antibodies may give rise to unspecific binding but such binding should not differ between patients and controls. We therefore think that unspecific binding is an unlikely explanation for our findings. It has previously been shown that this monoclonal anti-LPS antibody does not bind to environmental Chlamydiae [22, 23]. The genus-specific LPS epitope is not shared by other known gram-negative bacteria and monoclonal antibodies do not bind LPS of those organisms [24]. Thus, positive staining of LPS can be considered as a marker of past or present Chlamydia infection. We used different techniques to visualize Chlamydia LPS. In addition to immunofluorescence with a FITC-conjugated monoclonal antibody, we used a polyclonal antibody to Chlamydia LPS and the standard streptavidin-biotin technique for light microscopy. The latter technique also showed presence of antigen in the same cell types. We used Western blot on new biopsies from a limited number of patients and confirmed that Chlamydia LPS was present in the tissue samples from these patients. These findings further support the hypothesis that observed antigens have a bacterial origin.

The second question concerns the identity of the species involved. We used a genus-specific antibody to Chlamydia LPS and species-specific antibodies to C. pneumoniae and C. trachomatis MOMP. Since we found positive staining for C. trachomatis MOMP in 79% of Chlamydia LPS biopsies and none of them was positive for C. pneumoniae we hypothesized that the origin of these antigens is a past or present infection with C. trachomatis.

The third question is if observed antigens represent an ongoing infection or not. We investigated archived biopsy material from the small bowel and this puts certain limits on our ability to ascertain the underlying cause for observed findings as well as their specificity. To confirm and strengthen our immunohistochemical findings we used antibodies to different antigens and also different methods of visualisation. In a limited number of cases we had the opportunity to take new biopsies for more advanced analyses using molecular biology techniques, proteomics and electron microscopy. Whereas electron microscopy showed presence of Chlamydia-like organisms in the cytoplasm of enteroendocrine cells, similar to those described in persistent C. trachomatis infection [25], we were unable to detect chlamydial DNA in a small number of patients using standard extraction and amplification protocols. It is possible that the standard methods we used for nucleic acid retrieval were inadequate for the detection of a persistent infection [26]. Another explanation for the contradictory results could be that chlamydial antigens were remainders of a past, but no longer present infection [27]. The latter seems unlikely in light of the long-term presence of C. trachomatis antigens observed in several of our patients. Long-term presence of antigens is more likely to be attributable to replicating Chlamydiae residing in the diseased tissue [28]. At present, however, we cannot determine if patients with severe IBS have an ongoing intestinal infection with C. trachomatis or not. Neither can we explain the presence of inflammation in myenteric ganglia or neuropathy by the finding of Chlamydia antigens in enteroendocrine cells. A possible link between the presence of Chlamydia antigens in enteroendocrine cells and myenteric inflammation could be autoimmune mechanisms related to heat shock protein 60 [29], but at this time such a mechanism remains purely speculative.

We found Chlamydia antigen also in macrophages. It is known that Chlamydiae become spontaneously persistent following the infection of monocytes and the monocyte is the common host cell for Chlamydiae during persistent infection [30–32]. Chlamydiae may participate in the maintenance of local immunological response and inflammation via infected monocytes/macrophages and also use them to spread infection to other organs [33].

Some of our Chlamydia LPS positive patients did not show the presence of MOMP antigen. Chlamydiae down-regulate the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) expression in the persistent state [34]. Attenuated synthesis of MOMP, usually considered the immuno-dominant surface epitope of the organism, in combination with its almost exclusively intracellular location during persistence may help to provide some relative invisibility from immune surveillance [34].

The presence of C. trachomatis antigens in small bowel mucosa has not been demonstrated in IBS patients before. However, it is known that Chlamydiae can persist in the intestinal mucosa of certain animals for a long time without infection-induced inflammation [35]. The specificity of C. trachomatis antigens for IBS compared to other gastrointestinal diseases is unknown. We did not have access to biopsies from the upper small intestine of patients with for example Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. At the same time, it is difficult to rule out the co-existence of IBS with such diseases and this might blur the results of such a comparison. We therefore decided to compare our patients with severe IBS to healthy controls in which IBS and other motility disorders could be excluded.

The finding of C. trachomatis antigens in enteroendocrine cells makes it tempting to suggest a novel pathogenetic mechanism in IBS. Enteroendocrine cells play a pivotal role in the control of gut motility and secretion and increased numbers of enteroendocrine cells have been detected in patients that developed IBS after an acute gastroenteritis [36]. It is unknown if infection alters the function of enteroendocrine cells in man but animal experiments using different models of enteric infection have shown pronounced changes in both numbers of enteroendocrine cells and their function [37, 38]. Serotonin-producing enteroendocrine cells may present an ideal location for Chlamydia due to their abundance of tryptophan. Tryptophan is required for normal development in Chlamydia species and tryptophan metabolism has been implicated in Chlamydia persistence and tissue tropism [39]. We hypothesize that Chlamydia actively may enter EEC searching for tryptofan. Infection may impair EEC serotonin and hormone secretion and cause motility disturbances but further studies on enteroendocrine cell lines or cultured EEC are required for elucidating such a mechanism.

Conclusions

We found chlamydial antigens in enteroendocrine cells and macrophages of the small bowel mucosa in 89% of patients with IBS but in only 14% of controls. Even though we were unable to prove the presence of viable Chlamydia, lack of positive PCR being the major obstacle, the evidence for an intracellular organism or at least a protein structure with an antigen in common with Chlamydia in patients with IBS is strong. Our results suggest that the presence of C. trachomatis antigens in enteroendocrine cells may be involved in the pathogenesis in IBS.

Abbreviations

CI: 

confidence interval

DN: 

degenerative neuropathy

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

EEC: 

enteroendocrine cells

FITC: 

fluorescein (-isothiocyanate)

IBS: 

irritable bowel syndrome

LEG: 

lymphocytic epithelio-ganglionitis

LG: 

lymphocytic ganglionitis

LPS: 

lipopolysaccharide

LMPC: 

laser microdissection pressure catapulting

MOMP: 

major outer membrane protein: PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet Regional Project Funding (ALF grants 2005-0339 and 2006-0357), The Swedish Society of Medicine (The Bengt Ihre foundation), and Foundation Olle Engkvist Byggmästare. AD is the recipient of a Rome Foundation Fellowship in Functional GI and Motility Disorders. None of the funding sources had any involvement with the study. We are grateful to Kjell Hultenby for excellent electron microscopy work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
(2)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
(3)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
(4)
Department of Pathology and Cytology, Lund University, University Hospital MAS, Malmö, Sweden
(5)
Centre for Microbiological Preparedness, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Solna, Sweden

References

  1. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, Temple RD, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Whitehead WE, Janssens J, Funch-Jensen P, Corazziari E, Richter JE, Koch GG: U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993, 38: 1569-1580. 10.1007/BF01303162.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agreus L, Svardsudd K, Nyren O, Tibblin G: The epidemiology of abdominal symptoms: prevalence and demographic characteristics in a Swedish adult population. A report from the Abdominal Symptom Study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994, 29: 102-109. 10.3109/00365529409090447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mearin F, Badia X, Balboa A, Baro E, Caldwell E, Cucala M, Diaz-Rubio M, Fueyo A, Ponce J, Roset M, Talley NJ: Irritable bowel syndrome prevalence varies enormously depending on the employed diagnostic criteria: comparison of Rome II versus previous criteria in a general population. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001, 36: 1155-1161. 10.1080/00365520152584770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Muller-Lissner SA: Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut. 1999, 45 (Suppl 2): II43-47.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Tornblom H, Lindberg G, Nyberg B, Veress B: Full-thickness biopsy of the jejunum reveals inflammation and enteric neuropathy in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2002, 123: 1972-1979. 10.1053/gast.2002.37059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Giorgio R, Barbara G: Is irritable bowel syndrome an inflammatory disorder?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008, 10: 385-390. 10.1007/s11894-008-0073-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Spiller RC: Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2003, 124: 1662-1671. 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00324-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tornblom H, Holmvall P, Svenungsson B, Lindberg G: Gastrointestinal symptoms after infectious diarrhea: a five-year follow-up in a Swedish cohort of adults. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 5: 461-464. 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Courtright P, West SK: Contribution of sex-linked biology and gender roles to disparities with trachoma. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004, 10: 2012-2016.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Prior A, Wilson K, Whorwell PJ, Faragher EB: Irritable bowel syndrome in the gynecological clinic. Survey of 798 new referrals. Dig Dis Sci. 1989, 34: 1820-1824. 10.1007/BF01536698.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, Jenkinson CP, Dawes MG, Barlow DH, Kennedy SH: Chronic pelvic pain in the community--symptoms, investigations, and diagnoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 184: 1149-1155. 10.1067/mob.2001.112904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Williams RE, Hartmann KE, Sandler RS, Miller WC, Savitz LA, Steege JF: Recognition and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome among women with chronic pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 192: 761-767. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.634.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis C, Prior A, Whorwell PJ, Morris J: Chlamydia trachomatis infection: is it relevant in irritable bowel syndrome?. Digestion. 1998, 59: 157-159. 10.1159/000007481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilkinson NZ, Kingsley GH, Sieper J, Braun J, Ward ME: Lack of correlation between the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in synovial fluid from patients with a range of rheumatic diseases and the presence of an antichlamydial immune response. Arthritis Rheum. 1998, 41: 845-854. 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<845::AID-ART11>3.0.CO;2-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Witkin SS: Immunological aspects of genital chlamydia infections. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002, 16: 865-874. 10.1053/beog.2002.0326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wingate D, Hongo M, Kellow J, Lindberg G, Smout A: Disorders of gastrointestinal motility: towards a new classification. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002, 17 (Suppl): S1-14. 10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.7.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindberg G, Tornblom H, Iwarzon M, Nyberg B, Martin JE, Veress B: Full thickness biopsy findings in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and enteric dysmotility. Gut. 2009, 58: 1084-1090. 10.1136/gut.2008.148296.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Veress B, Nyberg B, Tornblom H, Lindberg G: Intestinal lymphocytic epithelioganglionitis: a unique combination of inflammation in bowel dysmotility: a histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 28 cases. Histopathology. 2009, 54: 539-549. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03265.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Everett KD, Hornung LJ, Andersen AA: Rapid detection of the Chlamydiaceae and other families in the order Chlamydiales: three PCR tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 575-580.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Muschiol S, Bailey L, Gylfe A, Sundin C, Hultenby K, Bergstrom S, Elofsson M, Wolf-Watz H, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B: A small-molecule inhibitor of type III secretion inhibits different stages of the infectious cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 14566-14571. 10.1073/pnas.0606412103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohman L, Simren M: New insights into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Liver Dis. 2007, 39: 201-215. 10.1016/j.dld.2006.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman MG, Dvoskin B, Kahane S: Infections with the chlamydia-like microorganism Simkania negevensis, a possible emerging pathogen. Microbes Infect. 2003, 5: 1013-1021. 10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00188-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Collingro A, Toenshoff ER, Taylor MW, Fritsche TR, Wagner M, Horn M: 'Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila', an endosymbiont of Acanthamoeba spp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005, 55: 1863-1866. 10.1099/ijs.0.63572-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Caldwell HD, Hitchcock PJ: Monoclonal antibody against a genus-specific antigen of Chlamydia species: location of the epitope on chlamydial lipopolysaccharide. Infect Immun. 1984, 44: 306-314.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Nettelnbreker E, Zeidler H, Bartels H, Dreses-Werringloer U, Daubener W, Holtmann H, Kohler L: Studies of persistent infection by Chlamydia trachomatis serovar K in TPA-differentiated U937 cells and the role of IFN-gamma. J Med Microbiol. 1998, 47: 141-149. 10.1099/00222615-47-2-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Freise J, Gerard HC, Bunke T, Whittum-Hudson JA, Zeidler H, Kohler L, Hudson AP, Kuipers JG: Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001, 60: 140-145. 10.1136/ard.60.2.140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Wyrick PB, Knight ST, Paul TR, Rank RG, Barbier CS: Persistent chlamydial envelope antigens in antibiotic-exposed infected cells trigger neutrophil chemotaxis. J Infect Dis. 1999, 179: 954-966. 10.1086/314676.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Beatty WL, Morrison RP, Byrne GI: Persistent chlamydiae: from cell culture to a paradigm for chlamydial pathogenesis. Microbiol Rev. 1994, 58: 686-699.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Yi Y, Yang X, Brunham RC: Autoimmunity to heat shock protein 60 and antigen-specific production of interleukin-10. Infect Immun. 1997, 65: 1669-1674.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hogan RJ, Mathews SA, Mukhopadhyay S, Summersgill JT, Timms P: Chlamydial persistence: beyond the biphasic paradigm. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 1843-1855. 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1843-1855.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Peters J, Hess S, Endlich K, Thalmann J, Holzberg D, Kracht M, Schaefer M, Bartling G, Klos A: Silencing or permanent activation: host-cell responses in models of persistent Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Cell Microbiol. 2005, 7: 1099-1108. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00534.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rihl M, Kohler L, Klos A, Zeidler H: Persistent infection of Chlamydia in reactive arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 281-284. 10.1136/ard.2005.044966.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Airenne S, Surcel HM, Alakarppa H, Laitinen K, Paavonen J, Saikku P, Laurila A: Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in human monocytes. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 1445-1449.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Inman RD, Whittum-Hudson JA, Schumacher HR, Hudson AP: Chlamydia and associated arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2000, 12: 254-262. 10.1097/00002281-200007000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Doughri AM, Storz J, Altera KP: Mode of entry and release of chlamydiae in infections of intestinal epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 1972, 126: 652-657.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dunlop SP, Jenkins D, Neal KR, Spiller RC: Relative importance of enterochromaffin cell hyperplasia, anxiety, and depression in postinfectious IBS. Gastroenterology. 2003, 125: 1651-1659. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.09.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wheatcroft J, Wakelin D, Smith A, Mahoney CR, Mawe G, Spiller R: Enterochromaffin cell hyperplasia and decreased serotonin transporter in a mouse model of postinfectious bowel dysfunction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005, 17: 863-870. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00719.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. O'Hara JR, Skinn AC, MacNaughton WK, Sherman PM, Sharkey KA: Consequences of Citrobacter rodentium infection on enteroendocrine cells and the enteric nervous system in the mouse colon. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8: 646-660. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00657.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Akers JC, Tan M: Molecular mechanism of tryptophan-dependent transcriptional regulation in Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 4236-4243. 10.1128/JB.01660-05.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

    40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/10/19/prepub

Copyright

© Dlugosz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us