Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of imaging features of HCCs and non-malignant nodules, LR-3 and LR-4

From: Optimizing LI-RADS: ancillary features screened from LR-3/4 categories can improve the diagnosis of HCC on MRI

LI-RADS features

HCCs(n = 311)

Non-HCC nodules(n = 162)

P value

LR-3 lesions(n = 153)

LR-4 lesions(n = 129)

LR-5 lesions(n = 191)

P value**

Major HCC features

  

Diameter: <10 mm

4.2(13/311)

25.3(41/162)

0.000

31.4(48/153)

3.9(5/129)

0.5(1/191)

0.000

Diameter: 10–19 mm

25.1(78/311)

42.0(68/162)

0.000

60.8(93/153)

17.8(23/129)

15.7(30/191)

0.000

Diameter:≥20 mm

70.7(220/311)

32.7(53/162)

0.000

7.8(12/153)

78.3(101/129)

83.8(160/191)

0.000

Non-rim APHE

79.7(248/311)

55.6(90/162)

0.000

52.3(80/153

53.5(69/129)

99.0(189/191)

0.000

Non-peripheral washout

59.8(186/311)

10.5(17/162)

0.000

7.2(11/153)

41.1(53/129)

72.8(139/191)

0.000

Enhancing capsule

56.9(177/311)

11.1(18/162)

0.000

1.3(2/153)

41.1(53/129)

73.3(140/191)

0.000

Ancillary features Favoring malignancy in general

  

Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity

81.0(252/311)

50.0(81/162)

0.000

52.9(81/153)

72.9(94/129)

82.7(158/191)

0.000

Fat sparing in solid mass

9.0(28/311)

9.9(16/162)

0.742

7.8(12/153)

12.4(16/129)

8.4(16/191)

0.359;0.377;0.931

Iron sparing in solid mass

4.8(15/311)

0.6(1/162)

0.015

1.3(2/153)

4.7(6/129)

4.2(8/191)

0.220;0.170;0.158

Corona enhancement

10.3(32/311)

9.9(16/162)

1.000

5.2(8/153)

15.5(20/129)

10.5(20/191)

0.017;0.015;0.145

TP hypointensity

25.4(79/311)

13.0(21/162)

0.002

16.3(25/153)

25.6(33/129)

22.0(42/191)

0.155;0.151;0.235

HBP hypointensity

25.7(80/311)

14.8(24/162)

0.007

19.6(30/153)

25.6(33/129)

21.5(41/191)

0.471;0.476;0.730

Restricted diffusion

87.1(271/311)

58.6(95/162)

0.000

60.1(92/153)

82.9(107/129)

88.0(168/191)

0.000

Ancillary features Favoring HCC in particular

  

Nodule-in-nodule appearance

1.0(3/311)

0(0/162)

0.554

0(0/153)

0.8(1/129)

1.0(2/191)

0.464;0.299;0.231

Mosaic appearance

11.6(36/311)

0(0/162)

0.000

0(0/153)

10.1(13/129)

12.0(23/191)

0.000

Blood product in mass

17.7(55/311)

0(0/162)

0.000

1.3(2/153)

16.3(21/129)

16.8(32/191)

0.000

Fat in mass

30.5(95/311)

11.1(18/162)

0.000

15.0(23/153)

20.2(26/129)

33.5(64/191)

0.000

Non-enhancing capsule

13.5(42/311)

3.7(6/162)

0.001

3.9(6/153)

10.1(13/129)

15.2(29/191)

0.003;0.002;0.001

Ancillary features Favoring benignity

  

Parallel blood pool

1.0(3/311)

9.3(15/162)

0.000

7.2(11/153)

5.4(7/129)

0(0/191)

0.001

Undistorted vessels

3.5(11/311)

0.6(1/162)

0.066

0.7(1/153)

3.9(5/129)

3.1(6/191)

0.182;0.124;0.165

Iron in mass more than liver

0(0/311)

0(0/162)

NA

0(0/153)

0(0/129)

0(0/191)

NA

Marked T2 hyperintensity

1.0(3/311)

21.6(35/162)

0.000

16.3(25/153)

8.5(11/129)

1.0(2/191)

0.000

HBP isointensity

1.6(5/311)

16.7(27/162)

0.000

15.0(23/153)

5.4(7/129)

1.0(2/191)

0.000

  1. **: 1.P value was 0.000: there was statistical difference among the three groups of LR-3/LR-4/LR-5, and the p values were all 0.000
  2. 2. P value was specific number: there was no statistical difference among the three groups of LR-3/LR-4/LR-5. The three values were LR3 vs. LR-4; LR-3 vs. LR-5; LR-4 vs. LR-5, respectively