Skip to main content

Table 3 Complete resolution rate of symptoms after treatment (per protocol set)

From: Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study

 

HIP1601

(n = 93)

HGP1705

(n = 94)

P-value

Baseline

Week 4

Week 8*

Baseline

Week 4

Week 8*

 

Overall symptoms

92

46

(49.5%)

48

(51.6%)

94

46

(48.9%)

47

(50.0%)

0.941***

0.943****

P-value**

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

Heartburn and acid regurgitation

60

28

(46.7%)

30

(50.0%)

64

37

(57.8%)

37

(57.8%)

0.214***

0.383****

P-value**

 

0.004

0.002

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

Heartburn

77

49

(63.6%)

50

(64.9%)

76

55

(72.4%)

55

(72.4%)

0.247***

0.322****

P-value**

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

Acid regurgitation

75

51

(68.0%)

52

(69.3%)

77

51

(66.2%)

52

(67.5%)

0.817***

0.811****

P-value**

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

Dysphagia

11

4

(36.4%)

4

(36.4%)

18

10

(55.6%)

10

(55.6%)

0.316***

0.316****

P-value**

 

0.705

0.705

 

0.467

0.317

 

Epigastric pain

36

25

(69.4%)

26

(72.2%)

42

29

(69.0%)

30

(71.4%)

0.970***

0.938****

P-value**

 

0.011

0.004

 

0.004

0.002

 
  1. The complete resolution rate was defined proportion of patients with ‘score 0’ of severity during the last 7 days prior to the visit
  2. *Cumulative complete resolution rate of symptoms by week 8
  3. **P-value for comparison of before/after administration using McNemar’s test
  4. *** P-value for week 4 Using Chi-squre test or Fisher’s exact test
  5. **** P-value for week 8 Using Chi-squre test or Fisher’s exact test