Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included cohort studies

From: Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus entecavir in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure with hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies

Year

Study design

Country

Intervention(TDF/ETV)

Age, Mean (SD)(TDF/ETV)

Sample

size

(TDF/ETV)

Follow-up time (weeks)

Outcome

Hossain et al. [17]

2021

Prospective cohort

Bangladesh

300 mg/d 0.5 mg/d

43.8 ± 13.1

44.2 ± 12.3

16/16

12

Survival rate HBV-DNA clearance rate CTP score MELD score

Zhang et al. [13]

2020

Prospective cohort

China

NR

44.33 ± 15.87

45.97 ± 14.10

39/39

24

Survival rate HBV-DNA levels Serum surface antigen conversion

Zhang et al. [16]

2021

Prospective cohort

China

300 mg/d 0.5 mg/d

38.87 ± 7.95

43.90 ± 9.91

23/42

24

Survival rate HBV-DNA clearance rate Serum surface antigen conversion MELD score Safety

Li et al. [14]

2021

Prospective cohort

China

300 mg/d 0.5 mg/d

41 ± 12.64

39.72 ± 9.13

10/20

48

Survival rate HBV-DNA levels MELD score Safety

Wan et al. [15]

2019

Retrospective cohort study

China

300 mg/d 0.5 mg/d

43.54 ± 11.13

50.71 ± 10.7

32/35

12

Survival rate HBV-DNA levels HBV DNA clearance rate Serum surface antigen conversion CTP score MELD score Safety

  1. TDF Tenofovir, ETV Entecavir, NR Not reported