Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of lifestyle factors on fatty liver index in binary logistic regression analysis

From: Fatty liver index relationship with biomarkers and lifestyle: result from RaNCD cohort study

FLI ≥ 60

Male

Female

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

Odds ratio

P value

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

P value

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

P value

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

P value

Socio-economic status

        

 Weak

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Moderate

1.21(0.99–1.49)

0.057

1.18(0.96–1.45)

0.110

1.38(1.17–1.62)

< 0.001

1.28(1.08–1.53)

0.004

 Good

1.72(1.42–2.08)

< 0.001

1.63(1.33-2.00)

< 0.001

1.25(1.04–1.51)

0.015

1.17(0.95–1.45)

0.133

Physical activity (Met h/day)

     

 Low

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Moderate

0.74(0.63–0.88)

0.001

0.76(0.64–0.89)

0.001

0.81(0.69–0.96)

0.016

0.77(0.65–0.91)

0.003

 High

0.43(0.37–0.51)

< 0.001

0.44(0.37–0.53)

< 0.001

0.53(0.41–0.70)

< 0.001

0.54(0.41–0.71)

< 0.001

Visceral Fat Area

1.05(1.05–1.18)

< 0.001

1.05(1.01–1.45)

< 0.001

1.05 (1.04–1.05)

< 0.001

1.05(1.04–1.05)

< 0.001

Energy intake (kcal/d)

1.00(1.00-1.23)

0.001

1.00(1.00-1.19)

0.019

1.00 (1.00-1.51)

0.045

1.00(1.00-1.09)

0.009

Depression

0.89(0.49–1.62)

0.711

0.93(0.51–1.70)

0.822

1.68(1.06–2.64)

0.025

1.71(1.07–2.71)

0.022

Dyslipidemia

4.13(3.57–4.80)

< 0.001

4.09(3.52–4.75)

< 0.001

2.81(2.41–3.27)

0.002

2.69(2.31–3.14)

0.003

  1. Model 1: Unadjusted model
  2. Model 2: adjusted for age, marital status, residency and alcohol use
  3. *Obtained by binary logistic regression, P value < 0.05
Back to article page

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us