Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes between cap-fitted forward and side viewing endoscopes in patients with Billroth II anastomosis

Original Submission
5 Oct 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Sung Bum Kim
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Sung Bum Kim
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Sung Bum Kim
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Sung Bum Kim
Resubmission - Version 7
31 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
2 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Sung Bum Kim
Resubmission - Version 8
2 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
7 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
27 Feb 2023 Editorially accepted
6 Apr 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12876-023-02701-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page