Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of the 11 studies included in the systematic review

From: Systematic review of cholangiocarcinoma in Africa: epidemiology, management, and clinical outcomes

Quality variable

Quality variable categories

Number of studies (%)

External validity

Non-probability

11/11 (100%)

Probability

0

Response rate or proportion of patients managed for CCA

Above 80%

11/11 (100%)

Between 60 and 80%

0

Not reported

0

Validity of measurement methods and bias in the measurement of cholangiocarcinoma

Histology

7/11 (63.6%))

Enhanced CT and/or MRCP

1

Not reported

3

Control for important confounders

Yes

5/11 (45.6%)

Not reported

6

Final mean % score (mean across the items)

 

77.3%