Table 2 Results of sensitivity analysis
Excluded study | Original OR and 95%CI | After excluding study | Â | Â |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  | OR and 95%CI | I2 | PQ值 |
Ruiter 2012 | 0.73 (0.66–0.80) | 0.83 (0.68–1.01) | 87.8% | 0.000 |
Bodmer 2011 | 0.83 (0.57–1.21) | 0.82 (0.69–0.98) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Sung 2020 | 0.51 (0.36–0.72) | 0.84 (0.71–1.01) | 88.4% | 0.000 |
Zhao 2022 | 1.01 (0.51–1.98) | 0.82 (0.68–0.98) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Valente 2017 | 1.35 (0.68–2.66) | 0.83 (0.68–1.01) | 88.8% | 0.000 |
Oh 2020 | 0.88 (0.70–1.11) | 0.82 (0.68–0.98) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Murff 2018 | 0.85 (0.57–1.27) | 0.82 (0.68–0.98) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Tsilidis 2014 | 0.70 (0.45–1.07) | 0.83 (0.69–0.99) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Wang 2013 | 1.14 (0.68–1.91) | 0.81 (0.68–0.97) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Liao 2012 | 0.85 (0.39–1.89) | 0.82 (0.69–0.98) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Oliveria 2008 | 1.26 (0.80–1.99) | 0.81 (0.67–0.96) | 88.8% | 0.000 |
Tseng 2018 | 0.49 (0.25–0.96) | 0.84 (0.70–1.00) | 88.8% | 0.000 |
Currie 2009 | 0.16 (0.10–0.27) | 0.88 (0.75–1.04) | 85.7% | 0.000 |
De 2017 | 1.11 (0.72–1.71) | 0.81 (0.68–0.97) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Farmer 2019 | 3.11 (1.24–7.76) | 0.80 (0.67–0.95) | 88.5% | 0.000 |
Lee 2018 | 0.86 (0.77–0.96) | 0.82 (0.67–1.00) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Lee 2011 | 0.15 (0.03–0.79) | 0.84 (0.70–1.00) | 88.7% | 0.000 |
Lu 2015 | 1.50 (1.07–2.09) | 0.80 (0.67–0.95) | 88.3% | 0.000 |
Vicentini 2018 | 1.51 (0.59–3.89) | 0.81 (0.68–0.97) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Walker 2015 | 1.01 (0.61–1.68) | 0.81 (0.68–0.98) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
You 2020 | 1.34 (1.21–1.48) | 0.79 (0.68–0.93) | 79.8% | 0.000 |
Hsieh 2012 | 0.63 (0.28–1.41) | 0.83 (0.69–0.99) | 88.9% | 0.000 |
Van 2011 | 0.64 (0.56–0.74) | 0.83 (0.70–1.00) | 87.6% | 0.000 |
Li 2009 | 0.38 (0.22–0.69) | 0.85 (0.71–1.01) | 88.4% | 0.000 |
Sung 2020 Currie 2009 Hsieh 2012 Van 2011 | NA | 0.95(0.80–1.12) | 83.7% | 0.000 |