Table 3 Treatment method and the result of esophageal injury
From: Risk factors for the poor prognosis of Benign esophageal perforation: 8-year experience
Treatment regiment | N | Death | Prognosis and complication |
|---|---|---|---|
Gastroscopy | 87 | 0 | 2 patients developed esophageal fistula |
Gastroscopy + titanium clip closed | 3 | 0 | none |
Gastroscopy + closed thoracic drainage | 1 | 0 | none |
Gastroscopy + endovascular graft exclusion | 1 | 0 | none |
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vats | 4 | 1 | 1 patient died of postoperative respiratory and cardiac arrest |
Gastroscopy + open surgery | 6 | 1 | 1 patient died of AEF, and 2 patients developed esophageal fistula |
Open surgery | 19 | 6 | 1 patient died of AEF, 1 patient died of respiratory failure, 3 patients died of MODS, 1 patient died of septic shock, 2 patients developed esophageal fistula, 1 patient developed pyothorax |
Closed thoracic drainage | 2 | 1 | 1 patient died of MODS |
Gastroscopy | 6 | 3 | 1 patient died of septic shock, 1 patient died of AEF, 1 patient died of respiratory failure, 1 patient developed tracheoesophageal fistula, 1 patient developed esophageal fistula |
Without invasive treatment | 6 | 3 | 1 patient died of aortoclasia, 1 patient died of septic shock with respiratory failure, 1 patient died of septic shock |