Skip to main content

Table 2 Hazard ratios for NAFLD events by quintiles of GGT/HDL-C ratio

From: Assessing the longitudinal association between the GGT/HDL-C ratio and NAFLD: a cohort study in a non-obese Chinese population

 

HR (95% CI)

P for trend

Multivariable analysis

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

GGT/HDL-C ratio (per SD)

Crude model

1.11 (1.10, 1.13)

Ref

1.68 (1.37, 2.05)

2.52 (2.09, 3.04)

3.52 (2.94, 4.21)

5.29 (4.45, 6.29)

 < 0.001

Model I

1.09 (1.07, 1.10)

Ref

1.49 (1.22, 1.82)

2.11 (1.75, 2.55)

2.57 (2.14, 3.09)

3.45 (2.90, 4.12)

 < 0.001

Model II

1.09 (1.06, 1.11)

Ref

1.47 (1.20, 1.79)

2.05 (1.70, 2.48)

2.51 (2.09, 3.01)

3.28 (2.74, 3.92)

 < 0.001

Model III

1.08 (1.05, 1.10)

Ref

1.55 (1.27, 1.89)

2.18 (1.81, 2.64)

2.71 (2.25, 3.26)

3.33 (2.76, 4.01)

 < 0.001

Model IV

1.07 (1.04, 1.10)

Ref

1.56 (1.28, 1.91)

2.20 (1.82, 2.67)

2.73 (2.26, 3.29)

3.38 (2.79, 4.08)

 < 0.001

  1. NAFLD nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratios; other abbreviations as in Table 1; Crude model adjusted for none; Model I adjusted for sex, age, height and BMI; Model II adjusted for model 1 plus ALT, AST, ALP and Cr; Model III adjusted for model 2 plus FPG, TG, LDL, SBP and DBP; Model IV adjusted for model III plus ALB, GLB, UA and BUN
Back to article page

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us