Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment using the CHEERS statement checklist

From: Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

 

Section/item

Full economic evaluations

Partial economic evaluations

USA

Italy

United Kingdom

Canada

USA

Italy

United Kingdom

Rostambeigi 2014 [20]

Rostambeigi 2014 [21]

Parikh 2018 [27]

Marqueen 2021 [30]

Rognoni 2018 [23]

Rognoni 2017 [26]

Chaplin 2015 [24]

Palmer 2017 [25]

Walton 2020 [28]

Manas 2021 [22]

Muszbek 2020 [29]

Hubert 2016 [32]

Ray 2012 [34]

Ljuboja 2021 [35]

Colombo 2015 [31]

Lucà 2018 [36]

Rognoni 2018 [37]

Muszbek 2019 [33]

Muszbek 2021 [38]

Pollock 2020 [39]

a

b

b

a

a

a

b

b

a

a

a

b

a

a

a

a

a

b

b

a

1

Title

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

Abstract

1

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

3

Background and objectives

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4

Study population, objectives, and subgroups

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

5

Setting and location

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

6

Perspective

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

Comparators

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

8

Time horizon

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

9

Discount rate

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

Selections of health outcomes

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

11

Measurement of effectiveness

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

12

Measurement and valuation of preference-based outcomes

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

13

Estimating resources and costs

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

14

Currency, price date, and conversion

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

15

Choice of model

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

16

Assumptions

1

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

17

Analytic methods

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

18

Study parameters

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

19

Incremental costs and outcomes

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

20

Characterizing uncertainty

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

21

Characterizing heterogeneity

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

22

Discussion

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

23

Source of funding

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

24

Conflicts of interest

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

 

Total

17

11

14

24

24

23

11

14

24

24

24

12

18

19

18

17

20

13

12

20

 

% (n)

71%

46%

58%

100%

100%

96%

46%

58%

100%

100%

100%

60%

90%

95%

90%

85%

100%

65%

60%

100%

  1. aArticle
  2. bOral communications and abstracts