Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportion of cirrhosis complications in the studied groups

From: Effect of alcohol on clinical complications of hepatitis virus-induced liver cirrhosis: a consecutive ten-year study

Complications

ALD

n (%)

HBV

n (%)

HCV

n (%)

ALD + HBV

n (%)

ALD + HCV

n (%)

P value

HCC

170 (10.3)

7622 (42.2)a

142 (20.8)a,b,d

832 (52.2)a,b

96 (34.3)a,c,d

< 0.001

Infection

553 (33.5)

4184 (23.1)a

129 (18.9)a,d

486 (30.5)b

79 (28.2)c

< 0.001

Ascites

892 (54.0)

7835 (43.3)a

252 (37.0)a,b,d

879 (55.1)b

144 (51.4)c

< 0.001

HE

127 (7.7)

947 (5.2)a

20 (2.9)a,d

104 (6.5)

14 (5.0)

< 0.001

Thrombus

102 (6.2)

1040 (5.8)

35 (5.1)

80 (5.0)

12 (4.3)

0.461

EGV

813 (49.6)

6612 (38.3)a

266 (41.1)b

707 (45.5)a,b

129 (46.1)b

0.001

EGVB

318 (39.1)

1990 (30.1)a

87 (32.7)

306 (43.3)b

66 (51.2)c

< 0.001

HRS

49 (3.0)

276 (1.5)a

8 (1.2)

35 (2.2)

3 (1.1)

< 0.001

  1. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HE, hepatic encephalopathy; EGV, esophageal gastric varices; EGVB, esophageal gastric variceal bleeding, HRS, hepatorenal syndrome
  2. aMeans value statistically significant compared to that in ALD; bmeans value statistically significant compared to that in HBV; cmeans value statistically significant compared to that in HCV; dmeans value statistically significant compared to that in HBV + ALD. Bonferroni correction was used for “P” during pairwise comparisons
  3. The proportion of EGV was calculated by dividing the number of patients reported with EGV by the number of patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy or other imaging examination such as CT or MR, capable of detecting EGV; The proportion of EGVB was calculated by dividing number of patients reported with EGVB by the number of confirmed EGV patients